Read original post

In a time when immigration policy and labor shortages are at the forefront of political discourse, the idea that illegal immigrants are the solution to workforce deficits continues to be a divisive topic. Recent arguments from the left suggest that importing millions of unskilled migrants into the United States and Europe is necessary to avert an impending demographic crisis and address labor shortages, which they claim could also help curb inflation by preventing wage increases.

However, a closer examination reveals that this argument may not hold up under scrutiny. An analysis of the dynamics of immigration and labor markets suggests that illegal immigrants do not inherently resolve labor shortages, as they bring with them their own demand for services. For instance, they require dental care, automotive repairs, and consume various other services, effectively creating additional demand for labor in their new communities.

The argument posits that if a country like France, with a population of 65 million, were to be annexed by another nation, it would not result in a surplus of idle workers. Instead, French citizens, who are already engaged in various occupations within their economy, would carry their existing labor demands with them.

This concept extends to the composition and skill levels of immigrants. Admitting a large number of unskilled workers may lead to an oversupply in certain sectors, driving down wages for domestic unskilled labor while exacerbating shortages in skilled professions. Conversely, the targeted immigration of skilled professionals, such as dentists, doctors, and engineers, could alleviate specific skill shortages.

Corporations have been known to advocate for increased immigration to benefit from lower wages, but this does not necessarily address the broader issue of labor shortages across different sectors of the economy. The call for more skilled immigration has found support across the political spectrum, including from figures like Donald Trump, who have advocated for an emphasis on skilled over unskilled labor.

Public opinion, particularly in countries experiencing a surge in immigration like France, appears to be increasingly skeptical of the labor shortage argument. Polling data reveals that a majority of French citizens, especially women and blue-collar workers, do not buy into the claim that unskilled immigrants are the solution to their economic challenges.

While globalists and certain government factions may continue to promote large-scale unskilled immigration, it is important for the electorate to remain informed about the realities of labor market dynamics. Understanding these intricacies is crucial in shaping a balanced and effective immigration policy that serves the interests of the workforce and the economy at large.

Google Metadata Description: Explore the truth behind claims that illegal immigrants solve labor shortages. Uncover the impact on the economy and workforce dynamics in our in-depth analysis.

Read original post

In a recent examination of the U.S. jobs report, Peter St. Onge dissects the seemingly robust jobs report released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The report, which has been labeled "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history" by Zero Hedge, showcased a surprise surge in employment, with 353,000 jobs reportedly added. Contrary to expectations, average hourly earnings allegedly climbed by a substantial 4.5 percent. However, upon closer scrutiny, experts are questioning the validity of these numbers.

The report's illusion of job growth is attributed to a reduction in the average workweek to 34.1 hours, a low not witnessed since the 2008 financial crisis, unless one considers the COVID lockdown periods. This statistical maneuver presents an increase in hourly pay, not due to actual wage growth, but rather the assumption of a shorter workweek. Critics argue that this raises two possibilities: either the economy is in a state akin to the 2008 downturn, or there is an intentional skewing of data to secure additional budgetary concessions from the White House.

Further investigation reveals that the nature of the job growth is also under scrutiny. The U.S. Census Household survey, which inquires directly about employment status, indicates that nearly half of the jobs reported by the BLS may not exist. The survey suggests that instead of the celebrated job creation, there was a loss of 31,000 jobs. Additionally, data on part-time work implies that the economy did not generate any new full-time positions last year; the jobs that did materialize were mostly in the gig economy or as a second source of income for those struggling to make ends meet.

via Zero Hedge

The Wall Street Journal's findings further reinforce this narrative, revealing that the few full-time jobs created were predominantly in government and social assistance sectors, funded by taxpayer dollars. This suggests a contraction in the private sector—the actual wealth-creating segment of the economy.

via WSJ

In a striking revelation, new data indicates that since 2018, all job growth in the U.S. has been among foreign-born workers, with no net increase for native-born employees. This divergence is largely attributed to the BLS's "seasonal adjustment" practices. While seasonal adjustments are standard for accounting for employment fluctuations, the staggering 3 million job difference between raw data and adjusted figures raises concerns over the potential for manipulation to favor certain political narratives.

via Zero Hedge

As the Biden administration continues to navigate the delicate economic landscape, key statistics such as jobs and inflation are becoming increasingly contentious. With public opinion polls reflecting a harsher economic reality than official reports suggest, the apparent disconnect between government data and on-the-ground experiences remains a topic of heated debate.

We will continue to monitor and report on these developments as more information becomes available.