<rss
      xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
      xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
      xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
      xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
      xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
      version="2.0"
    >
      <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Scrib]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[scrib enables you to accept bitcoin on the web with any bitcoin payment processor you prefer.  available to @Ghost users now. more to come.  a @TFTC21 company.]]></description>
        <link>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/tag/tftc-podcast/</link>
        <atom:link href="https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/tag/tftc-podcast/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
        <itunes:new-feed-url>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/tag/tftc-podcast/rss/</itunes:new-feed-url>
        <itunes:author><![CDATA[brugeman]]></itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[scrib enables you to accept bitcoin on the web with any bitcoin payment processor you prefer.  available to @Ghost users now. more to come.  a @TFTC21 company.]]></itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
        <itunes:owner>
          <itunes:name><![CDATA[brugeman]]></itunes:name>
          <itunes:email><![CDATA[brugeman]]></itunes:email>
        </itunes:owner>
            
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:42:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:42:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      
      <itunes:image href="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1622637093104291840/Cnxe6q2g_400x400.jpg" />
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Freedom Fighters Need Bitcoin | Lyudmyla Kozlovska & Bota Jardemalie]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[Lyudmyla Kozlovska and Bota Jardemalie are freedom fighters on a mission to defend the rights of individuals to use bitcoin. ]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Lyudmyla Kozlovska and Bota Jardemalie are freedom fighters on a mission to defend the rights of individuals to use bitcoin. ]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:42:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iofreedom-fighters-need-bitcoin/</link>
      <comments>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iofreedom-fighters-need-bitcoin/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qqhxsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7enjv4jkgmmd94nxjemgw3jhyueddejk2epdvf5hgcm0d9hz7q3q9qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksxpqqqp65wkuu5e4</guid>
      <category>TFTC Podcast</category>
      
        <media:content url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/482-Lyuda-Bota.png" medium="image"/>
        <enclosure 
          url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/482-Lyuda-Bota.png" length="0" 
          type="image/png" 
        />
      <noteId>naddr1qqhxsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7enjv4jkgmmd94nxjemgw3jhyueddejk2epdvf5hgcm0d9hz7q3q9qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksxpqqqp65wkuu5e4</noteId>
      <npub>npub19qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksn4zc3g</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrib]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/freedom-fighters-need-bitcoin/">Read original post</a></p>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<p>The latest episode of the podcast brought to light the pressing issue of bitcoin mining regulation, focusing on the scrutiny it faces from regulators in both the European Union (EU) and the United States (US). The guests, human rights defenders Lyudmyla Kozlovska and Bota Jardemalie, shared their personal experiences and the critical role bitcoin plays as a life-saving tool for activists living under authoritarian regimes.</p>
<p>The conversation delved into the potential proof of work ban in the EU and its implications. Luda, the founder of Open Dialogue Foundation, a nonpartisan human rights organization, highlighted the vital importance of bitcoin as a financial tool when traditional banking services are weaponized by authoritarian states. This has led to severe consequences, including the torture and imprisonment of activists.</p>
<p>Bota, also a human rights defender and lawyer, emphasized the negative perceptions of bitcoin mining, painting it as both an environmental threat and a security risk. They discussed the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) efforts to develop sustainability indicators for crypto assets, which could lead to a de facto ban on proof of work by discouraging investment in assets deemed unsustainable.</p>
<p>The guests also touched on similar concerns in the US, where the Energy Information Administration is collecting data on crypto miners' energy usage, potentially leading to biased reports and unjust regulatory action. Marty, the host, expressed concern over the misguided narrative that bitcoin is primarily used for nefarious purposes, countering that it is a tool for freedom and economic empowerment.</p>
<p>Lyuda and Bota called for collective action to change the narrative and educate regulators about the positive impact of bitcoin, especially for those defending human rights. They stressed the importance of presenting personal testimonials to EU and US officials and the need for community support to continue their advocacy work.</p>
<h3>Sponsors</h3>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://app.zaprite.com/?utm_source=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/zaprite-tftc-40off-600x150@2x.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/Find-Talent-2400x1350.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h3>Best Quotes</h3>
<ol>
<li>"For us, bitcoin is something death and life tool saving life too, while, for example, we don't have privileges like most of people living in democratic countries." - Lyuda</li>
<li>"We, as the end users of bitcoin, we realize that it's absolutely necessary to defend bitcoin and specifically proof of work in the European Union." - Bota</li>
<li>"It's particularly interesting that right now, Europe particularly, and even the US, to a certain extent, have began using bias and discriminating against bitcoin mining at a time when both our energy systems are relatively weak." - Marty</li>
<li>"If you enjoy financial freedom, if you enjoy any kind of freedom, that means that someone did this job centuries or maybe years ago, and we right now doing the same in our countries and European Union and the US." - Lyuda</li>
<li>"Rights aren't granted. They're taken and defended." - Marty</li>
<li>"We believe in bitcoin, we believe in its power and we believe that the civil society around the world should adopt it." - Bota</li>
</ol>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>The discussion underscored the urgency with which the bitcoin community must come together to protect the core principles that make bitcoin a powerful tool for human rights. The potential regulations targeting proof of work and peer-to-peer transactions pose a significant threat not just to the cryptocurrency industry but to the very essence of financial freedom that bitcoin represents.</p>
<p>The personal stories shared by Lyuda and Bota serve as a stark reminder that for many around the world, bitcoin is more than a financial asset; it's a lifeline. The overarching message of the episode is a call to action for bitcoin users, miners, and advocates to unite in educating and influencing policymakers. The episode concludes with a sense of cautious optimism, a belief that through collective effort and strategic activism, the freedoms that bitcoin facilitates can be preserved and expanded for the benefit of all.</p>
<h3>Timestamps</h3>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>8:00 - EU attacks on Bitcoin<br>18:58 - Abuse of KYC/AML<br>25:10 - Confronting regulators about their consequences<br>37:45 - Timeline on preventing EU action<br>41:15 - What can be done<br>47:52 - What does the success of Bitcoin look like<br>50:11 - What it’s like when they come for you<br>52:50 - The laws are more draconian and less effective<br>58:04 - Narrative war<br>1:02:31 - Complacency<br>1:07:39 - Dealing with the stress<br>1:12:55 - Wrapping up</p>
<h3>Transcript</h3>
<p>00:00:02:05 - 00:00:05:05<br>Marty<br>Botha and Luda. Welcome to the show.  </p>
<p>00:00:05:07 - 00:00:07:18<br>Lyuda<br>Hello. Hello, everyone. Thank you.  </p>
<p>00:00:07:24 - 00:00:38:05<br>Marty<br>Witness Thank you for coming on. It's been nice getting to know you too over the last month or so, I guess a little. We met in Nashville at the Energy and Mining Summit, which was really cool event and it was really cool to have you there, considering what you guys are working on in the EU. And I guess the topic of today is regulators both in the EU and now the U.S. really focusing on Bitcoin mining as something that needs to be taken care of.  </p>
<p>00:00:38:05 - 00:01:00:21<br>Marty<br>And you two are on the front lines in the EU to make sure that there isn't a proof of work ban throughout the European Union, which is on the table right now. So I guess I can just start with what is going on in the European Union. Why have they honed in on proof of work and what could happen if nothing is done in the next few months?  </p>
<p>00:01:00:24 - 00:01:32:05<br>Lyuda<br>Yeah, allow me maybe to start a bit. Also introducing myself why we together with water and other activists, are doing this work. So first of all, I'm human defender. I am the president and founder of Open Dialog Foundation. This is a human rights organization, international nonpartisan and nonprofit organization. And we became a victim, a target of attack, coordinated attack of a three ton regime back in 2008 in the course of our human rights work on international level.  </p>
<p>00:01:32:08 - 00:02:11:23<br>Lyuda<br>So we had all protection like political protection, even President Macron of Germany, parliaments of France, Belgium, Germany and many others supported us. And with all of this protection, we were not able to be protected financially. So regimes were able to weaponize our banking data, basically depriving them the right to have financial services in the heart of Europe. And this is the reason why we discovered and use Bitcoin as a tool to resist against transnational repression when authoritarian regimes abuse, financial action, task force recommendations and the group you all financial data to prosecute your donors and recipients of the funds.  </p>
<p>00:02:11:26 - 00:02:35:26<br>Lyuda<br>As a consequence, our volunteers and our human rights defenders in the authoritarian states were tortured, disappeared or were in prison for many years. So for us, Bitcoin is something death and life tool saving life tool. Well, for example, we don't have privileges like most of people living in democratic countries. And this is a reason why we educate regulators.  </p>
<p>00:02:35:29 - 00:03:08:04<br>Lyuda<br>This is the reason why we defend proof of work which actually can guarantee us as a human right defenders financially excluded people the use of financial tool as a payment and this fundraising instrument and this is the reason why also my colleague both time when you are the activist of a building to change coalition, we bring this topic hearing all the time questions why you use Bitcoin, why you use this instrument if it's associated with the energy and actually security threats, it can harm environment.  </p>
<p>00:03:08:04 - 00:03:19:26<br>Lyuda<br>It's actually dangerous for our energy security. And I think what I will mention actually what exactly we address right now.  </p>
<p>00:03:19:28 - 00:03:55:16<br>Bota<br>Yeah. Thank you, Linda. Yeah, I'm a human rights defender and a lawyer, and we've been working together with Luke Muir for many, many years, for almost 15 years. And right now is one of the issues that we are working is this is what we call Bitcoin advocacy. So we is the end users of Bitcoin. We realize that that's absolutely necessary to defend Bitcoin and specifically proof of work in the European Union started with the European Union.  </p>
<p>00:03:55:16 - 00:04:25:17<br>Bota<br>But I would go to the US after. So what you'd already mentioned when we were bombarded with this questions how you use technologies that is bad for the environment, that is energy wasting. And so we started looking where this information is coming from, what's happening at the EU level. And we realize that there are two kind of major attack on Bitcoin consensus mechanism of on proof of work right?  </p>
<p>00:04:25:19 - 00:04:56:08<br>Bota<br>First of all, this is perceived by the regulator, by the European Commission, by the European Securities and Markets Authority, by the European Central Bank as energy based in mechanisms that is dangerous for the European Energy security and as well as there is an attack, that it's extremely dangerous technology for the environment, that it has a very high carbon footprint.  </p>
<p>00:04:56:13 - 00:05:23:13<br>Bota<br>So it's bad for the environment. And when we say that this is something that is ban of bit of proof of work is on the table in the European Union, everyone seeing that there will be some kind of views that they would specifically specific language that proof of work is banned since January one. Right. But no, it's not how it works.  </p>
<p>00:05:23:18 - 00:06:04:06<br>Bota<br>The way how it works is that right now, the so-called ESMA Esma is the European Securities and Markets Authority is developing sustainability indicators. So this sustainability indicators for all cryptocurrencies activities and specifically for Bitcoin consensus mechanism. And so as they will be deciding, they will develop a standard. It's what crypto assets, so-called sustainable. So good for the environment or not, at least not bad for the environment.  </p>
<p>00:06:04:08 - 00:06:37:29<br>Bota<br>And what kind of crypto assets are not good, not sustainable. And the problem is that if we look at the narrative that exist, it's everywhere level, all the European Union, we see that there's very, very negative perception of the Bitcoin mining. And I would say there's a student this a really discriminatory treatment in the bias that exist. Is it the institutions?  </p>
<p>00:06:38:02 - 00:07:22:24<br>Bota<br>Because this is something that they are not doing the research asking why, you know, voters, that this is how it's used, etc.. No, they are already specifically created this bias in the information, the sources that they're using. They are something that would have concerns. This is something that is not, you know, peer reviewed literature right now. It's usually something that is some newspaper articles or research reports that were specifically focused on negative externalities of Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:07:22:26 - 00:08:10:06<br>Bota<br>And of course, we worry about this very much. We know that the deadline is coming. It's the 1st of January 2021 or 25, sorry, that European Parliament is expecting a proposal from the European Commission. And so they want to know what kind of group activities consider it to be sustainable and what is not. And if it's something is not sustainable, you have to remember that means that this basically that it's something that they all the institutions, specifically European Central Bank, will create a disincentive to invest into that particular asset.  </p>
<p>00:08:10:08 - 00:08:44:29<br>Bota<br>And that's why it's very dangerous. And we see that the similar trend is happening in the US right now. And this really in parallel because you, you, you probably know that is the EU Energy Information Administration already started collecting information from crypto miners about their energy use and they have specific deadlines by which the information be collected. That's in by the end of July 2024.  </p>
<p>00:08:45:02 - 00:09:12:05<br>Bota<br>And after that, the Energy Information Administration will start publishing its reports. Right. But we already see that there is a certain bias even in the way how they are started to question in the industry about the energy use. So we can see that the developments is happening on both sides of the pot.  </p>
<p>00:09:12:07 - 00:09:38:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it feels like the wall, not the walls, are caving in, but it feels like the pressure is certainly on. And as you too mentioned, there's a ton of bias, a ton of discrimination. It's really disheartening as somebody I've been involved in the mining industry for six years now here in the United States, and it's abundantly clear to me, utilities providers, energy producers, that Bitcoin is additive to their operations.  </p>
<p>00:09:38:29 - 00:10:19:10<br>Marty<br>Bitcoin is just driven by pure economics. Is there Bitcoin mining to take advantage of wasted, stranded energy sources to make these energy systems more efficient to the point where it's enabling producers and utilities companies to reinvest, to build out more reliable infrastructure? And it's particularly interesting that right now Europe particularly, and even the U.S. to a certain extent, have began using bias and discriminating against Bitcoin mining at a time when both our energy systems are relatively weak to where they were only a decade or two ago.  </p>
<p>00:10:19:10 - 00:10:47:11<br>Marty<br>I mean, specifically in Europe, Germany being the prime example of a country that completely destroyed its energy system over the last 20 years and can use all the help it could get. And if action isn't taken in the next few months, they will completely block out a source of energy efficiency in Bitcoin mining that could really help them make their grid systems more stable.  </p>
<p>00:10:47:11 - 00:11:21:23<br>Marty<br>It's really insane. And then on top of that, again, bringing bias and discrimination to it like we see outside of mining this bitcoin in general. The line here in the United States as I'm sure it is in Europe as well, is that bitcoin's only used by criminals, drug users, money launderers. And as you to explain earlier and have shown through your work with human rights activists, like no, it's actually enabling human rights activists to evade despotic governments.  </p>
<p>00:11:21:26 - 00:11:40:20<br>Marty<br>And in fact the KYC, AML regulations that you want to thrust on everybody using a non-custodial wallet put them in danger because the despotic governments use these this information from KYC, AML policies to target dissidents.  </p>
<p>00:11:40:23 - 00:12:31:10<br>Lyuda<br>Yeah, exactly. And I would like to say that with the perspective of what's happening, Wolf, in the US, in you, if you compare this two countries in the US, you at least have voices and very active miners, Bitcoin miners and Bitcoin community who educates regulators. But again, even with this work, when we been last two weeks in the Senate and Congress and also we met with State Department with Financial action task forces, we conducted over 27 meetings in person during this all our advocacy mission in DC the first time heard how anti-money laundering regulation, how Financial Action Task Force's recommendation abused by dictators, how banking data weaponized not only in authoritarian states domestically, but how  </p>
<p>00:12:31:10 - 00:13:10:10<br>Lyuda<br>they actually can be all exposed in democracies. And we conducted the first round table for our CRYPTOASSETS, where we testified about this unfortunate experience and the consequences of this regulation from one side, but from other sites. We provided recommendations and tools we used to resist, again, this transnational repressions, authoritarian regimes, when basically email, emails and safety regulation is used as a transnational tool against the opposition and everyone around us and civil society and human rights activists, even abroad, not only domestically.  </p>
<p>00:13:10:13 - 00:13:38:25<br>Lyuda<br>So we see actually positive attitude. And so, for example, we were asked, okay, guys, what you want? And we said, we want to have neutral language to listen to Bitcoin and proof of work and actually beautiful transactions, privacy instruments like mixers, because we have no other tools. And we got response, okay, we need to then to have this dialog.  </p>
<p>00:13:38:26 - 00:14:01:18<br>Lyuda<br>So if you go to to bring to the miners, for example, who will testify along with you how it operates, will you will you help us to understand it? And I think this is a kind of key, key moment when we can bring voices from one side as end users, those who use this technology. We are not perceived as lobbyists and we are not lobbyists.  </p>
<p>00:14:01:18 - 00:14:23:03<br>Lyuda<br>We just defend our human rights and Bitcoin Bitcoin for us human rights because we don't have other instruments. And for many of us it's a question of life and death. We don't have this privilege to choose. And I'm actually paying today with these credit cards or these credit cards. We just don't have credit cards. These are our reality and this is how we live.  </p>
<p>00:14:23:05 - 00:14:50:15<br>Lyuda<br>So these perspective change narratives and we need to remember that right now narratives are shaping our lives and shaping decision making process of politicians, and we need to have voices. So Bitcoiners from all over the world, because EU is going to approach regulation to mining in a global way as a G7 countries. So once it's adopted in you, they want to use and waterless methodology.  </p>
<p>00:14:50:15 - 00:15:20:14<br>Lyuda<br>Talk to other G7 countries and we don't want to allow any democracy to use in a regulatory language negative association labeling towards to Bitcoin or proof of work of peer to peer transactions or any privacy instruments because it affects our life entirely. Imagine for us the only instrument we have to protect political prisoners, victims of tortures. It's actually to have support of democracies, democratic governments.  </p>
<p>00:15:20:16 - 00:15:45:01<br>Lyuda<br>And this these democratic governments labeled the only instrument we have how to deliver humanitarian aid, how to support families of political prisoners as illicit activity, as a threat to national security, energy security, Environmental Council. That means that all three China is you immediately going to use this against everyone who is using this instrument to receive our help. We don't want it.  </p>
<p>00:15:45:01 - 00:16:11:29<br>Lyuda<br>We don't want it to allow even to happen. And this is the reason why we educate and this is the reason why we try to bring as much as possible awareness, how and why we use Bitcoin as a tool for human rights and humanitarian needs. And when we asked by regulators, okay, so for example, they said, you know, we can shun because criminals are using Bitcoin as the instrument.  </p>
<p>00:16:11:29 - 00:16:38:02<br>Lyuda<br>And of course every technology can be used by better actors and good doctors. But we as the good doctors, we should have a legal way how to use it. You should not punish us because some criminals using these instruments or provide us the instruments to operate in authoritarian states where most of people financially excluded for political reasons and they have no answer what to provide us.  </p>
<p>00:16:38:05 - 00:17:08:26<br>Lyuda<br>And this is a reason why we think it's really important to educate right now when there is huge speed to weather this kind of, you know, this wish to show results quickly, especially before elections in Europe, when the main demand from the society to deal with energy crisis and environmental crisis. And we don't want proof of work and Bitcoin mining be in general just a scapegoat where it's easy to punish this technology because there is no waste in defense.  </p>
<p>00:17:08:29 - 00:17:12:24<br>Lyuda<br>We should not allow this.  </p>
<p>00:17:12:27 - 00:17:15:22<br>Marty<br>No further join Japan.  </p>
<p>00:17:15:27 - 00:18:10:23<br>Bota<br>No, I just, you know, basically covered all ground. But I just want to say that how we present it to the regulator, right, when we see that this this instrument is used by terrorist and money. Money wondrous. Right. But we as activists will been accused in money laundering in the in being members of extremist terrorists are organizations in being a threat to national security by the regimes where we defend human rights and just kind of an example, once we walked into a meeting with people from the commission that were drafting the anti-money laundering regulations and we wanted to discuss this problem of abuses, of this of this language, that that is an instrument of money  </p>
<p>00:18:10:25 - 00:18:36:09<br>Bota<br>and financing of terrorism. First thing we ask, we ask them, Have you ever met a real terrorist or a man? You wonder in their kind of. No, of course not. You know, in our line of business, we don't really meet them. And we said, I'm a man. You wonder and accuse of being mining wanderer and member of an extremist organization.  </p>
<p>00:18:36:17 - 00:19:24:20<br>Bota<br>You there is a threat to national security and money laundering as well. We had with us a person from the Valley Foundation and we said that at that time they were was they were our foreign agents, terrorists and money launderers. And so we had active news from all over the world in one room, and we all were labeled by dictators, by authoritarian regimes, that we are those criminals, but we are normal people and we actually defend human rights and we work with the institutions and we explain what kind of the new whistle blowers about the crimes committed by many regimes.  </p>
<p>00:19:24:23 - 00:19:57:15<br>Bota<br>So when you Liebowitz acknowledges that there's an instrument for money launderers, you you really create this bias. It's exactly how this authoritarian regimes create bias against us. And this is something that we want to fight against. And we have our examples We can explain to the regulator what what is happening. But at the same time, we need people from the industry explaining this side of the story, saying that, you know, this is a regulation, this is how they work.  </p>
<p>00:19:57:17 - 00:20:36:01<br>Bota<br>And if there is an article about this person that is person is committed some crimes, even if it's not proven, it just a pure, a pure, a piece of, you know, fake news. Right. They still going to take your bank account away because of the existing regulations. So what we need to do, we need to have people from the regulated industry and people like us to show the consequences or to the regulators the consequences of their actions, how people like us get financially excluded.  </p>
<p>00:20:36:04 - 00:21:05:09<br>Marty<br>And the really disheartening thing about all of this is the two tiered system that exists. I mean, the amount of money laundering that happens and is facilitated via the U.S. dollar far exceeds anything that Bitcoin does on a day to day, year to year basis or is done historically. And then these same regulators that are really close with the banking and financial industry specifically let these banks get away with murder.  </p>
<p>00:21:05:11 - 00:21:42:04<br>Marty<br>I think sometimes quite literally, but figuratively mainly. I mean, we had Jp morgan settle out of court with the U.S. Virgin Islands. They made a $75 million fine so that they wouldn't have to go to court and have discovery around the fact that Jp morgan was banking Jeffrey Epstein as he was laundering money for sex trafficking operation, obviously, famously, which HSBC in the Mexican drug cartels, they had teller windows that had slots where briefcases full of cash could be pushed through by by the drug cartels.  </p>
<p>00:21:42:04 - 00:22:13:01<br>Marty<br>They paid a small fine for that. And yet here comes Bitcoin, which isn't facilitating a lot of this. Yes, as you mentioned, both criminals can certainly use it, but it's a technology. They drink, water they use to fake security as well. We don't throw these things, make them illegal because terrorists are using them. And it's what I toil with personally and like, are these regulators, is that lazy that they're willing to bring a sledgehammer and smash anything that can be used by a criminal?  </p>
<p>00:22:13:03 - 00:22:41:20<br>Marty<br>Or are they more nefarious where they recognize the freedom that Bitcoin enables? And they don't like that freedom because it doesn't allow them to exert control that they would otherwise like to have. And that's where I see the sort of crossroads that we're at right now. It could be a Bitcoin here. It is one of the most freedom enabling technologies that humanity's ever come into contact with, and that really scares governments that that like control.  </p>
<p>00:22:41:24 - 00:22:54:11<br>Marty<br>And it's convincing them that, hey, you're going to have to be comfortable giving up control because freedom is more important than you controlling everybody's everyday life and what they do with their money.  </p>
<p>00:22:54:13 - 00:23:18:08<br>Lyuda<br>I think we still have hope anyways because I mean, we have concrete results, right? For the last two years of our advocacy for Bitcoin in order to protect it as a payment and fundraising instrument, we succeed to do so in EU and European Union. So we have an upcoming regulation actually recognition that CRYPTOASSETS can be used as a fundraising instrument and actually payment instruments.  </p>
<p>00:23:18:11 - 00:23:47:19<br>Lyuda<br>We hopefully would have also provisions to defend and protect financial data of both financial institutions and cryptoasset services providers. And we also have a provision about abuse of anti-money laundering regulation, a mechanism especially disinformation, to financially exclude people. So specific categories refugees, civil society, organization even mentioned in a regulation. But it's not enough. And unfortunately, G7 countries were not happy about our achievements.  </p>
<p>00:23:47:19 - 00:24:14:29<br>Lyuda<br>And this is the reason why we came to us two weeks ago to speak. We saw 27 representative self-regulatory bodies, both Senate's Financial Action Task Force, a State Department and Congress, because the US acting from one side that they create domestic legislation right now is the process of reform of anti-monopoly regulation and actually shaping crypto regulation in the US.  </p>
<p>00:24:15:05 - 00:24:45:06<br>Lyuda<br>But it's not true. Whenever U.S. decides to ship we in regulatory way domestically, it's affect affects entire world. And when G7 countries, U.S. demand, for example, where they say that's okay, we have to look into peer to peer transactions now self-hosted wallets as a something what is threat to financial integrity. It's affect, of course, other democracies. And we afraid that our achievements here in EU will be questioned.  </p>
<p>00:24:45:06 - 00:25:08:16<br>Lyuda<br>So we need to gain to defense of course, of wallet. We need to defend mixers as a privacy tools and do these above work. And we cannot ignore it because, for example, yesterday in Davos and we have discussion with some bitcoiners and they said you can just simply not comply. I cannot not comply because I get protection from you.  </p>
<p>00:25:08:16 - 00:25:37:07<br>Lyuda<br>And for example, my life would be literally under threat if I would not get protected from the attack since 2008 by three authoritarian regimes. And I'm really grateful for being protected. But from other side, I protect another people, political prisoners and all of us. We need to have both support of democracies and we need to be able to use Bitcoin as a peer to peer transactions, as a decentralized mechanism built on proof of work mechanism.  </p>
<p>00:25:37:09 - 00:26:24:18<br>Lyuda<br>So we need to provide security for developers of privacy instruments and also for miners if we don't succeed to do those things, this means that we lose our the only instrument. And luckily we have seen support from those regulators and legislators who approve human rights. Of course, you always have bad actors in every sphere, but how we succeed to have this changes how we succeed, to have a different national inter-parliamentary platforms, provisions that reflect See yourself Bitcoin and Stablecoins for human rights and humanitarian purposes in the regulations for 57 Member States more nor for America, Europe and Asia, actually, thanks to these people.  </p>
<p>00:26:24:20 - 00:26:50:08<br>Lyuda<br>So there are people and legislators who listen in us. But the problem is we need to remove voices. We need them to educate, make face to face meetings where they cannot direct questions. They will never risk it to us, even online or publicly. But they need to be able to to get this information. It's an effort, but it's a safe effort because you cannot do this activity in authoritarian states.  </p>
<p>00:26:50:10 - 00:27:19:18<br>Lyuda<br>Remind yourself what's happened in Kazakhstan back in January 2022, when most of miners were just cut off of Internet. You know why it happened? It's actually was the days when authorities of Kazakhstan employed Russian troops and domestically troops to shoot peaceful protesters. They not only should freedoms, they should real people. They killed Bitcoin mining in Kazakhstan and they killed their citizens who were protesting for freedoms.  </p>
<p>00:27:19:20 - 00:27:46:03<br>Lyuda<br>So the same we do right now. We have two transactions in Kazakhstan on the fault of fighting against to be transactions and everything around Salesforce. It was everything actually around any kind of financial freedoms in the most sophisticated action regime, able to lift sanctions from Russian banks in this country of in the US. And this is all happening and we ask questions to us regulators.  </p>
<p>00:27:46:03 - 00:27:52:09<br>Lyuda<br>Okay you want to have effective mechanism still was to Russia to circumvent sanctions, then change.  </p>
<p>00:27:52:09 - 00:27:52:23<br>Bota<br>Travel.  </p>
<p>00:27:52:24 - 00:28:34:06<br>Lyuda<br>Rule change assumption that you treat equally financial situations of third countries, authoritarian state and actually democracies. Did you transfer intelligence, financial intelligence, knowledge from democracy to authoritarian states, which is not used against actually criminals and organized groups or terrorists? Kazakhstan recognized Taliban as a legitimate government, but it's used against civil society in opposition. It takes 3 to 5 minutes to block bank account of opposition or civil society members whose fundraising for actually, you know, supportive of families of political prisoners.  </p>
<p>00:28:34:06 - 00:28:59:07<br>Lyuda<br>And because our reality and these arguments, the change perspective of those politicians who meet us and those who support human rights because normally they want to support us, but they don't know how and they don't know what is the role of Bitcoin because you would not read it in the media. Where you do will see that media would write about abuse of anti-money laundering, counter-terrorism regulation.  </p>
<p>00:28:59:09 - 00:29:26:01<br>Lyuda<br>Have you seen, for example, maybe publications, how, for example, activists were deprived or immigrants deprived the right to have financial services immediately In democracies? There is no this kind of information, and this is the reason why it's so important to work for the UN. Both achievements which we have and we have a lot of achievements right now. We just no capacity to go and continue this work and this is the reason why we came to Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:29:26:01 - 00:29:47:11<br>Lyuda<br>I say let us guys do it together because you are the same activist as us because Satoshi Nakamoto was the same freedom activist as us. He created and gave us this tool. But it's nothing for granted. You have to defend it. It's a basic human rights, and human rights are dying if they are not defended. And we saw it's many, many times.  </p>
<p>00:29:47:14 - 00:30:25:27<br>Marty<br>That's a very good point. Rights aren't granted. They're taken to defend it. And as it stands today with Bitcoin, we have to we have Bitcoin. We're using it in a peer to peer fashion. We're mining pretty efficiently and in many areas and we have to defend the right to do these things. And with that in mind, I know there is a pressing timeline here, so let's dive into the particulars of what is in front of the European Parliament as it pertains to proof of work, how long we have to convince lawmakers in the EU not to do this and what will happen if it does or does not pass.  </p>
<p>00:30:25:29 - 00:30:54:10<br>Bota<br>Yeah, we have to work on several fronts, right? This is not just the European Parliament and in the European Parliament we actually going to have elections in the summer of this year. So when the new European Parliament comes and starts working in September, we have to be already fully ready and we have to work by then with all European institutions.  </p>
<p>00:30:54:17 - 00:31:36:12<br>Bota<br>It means that ESMA it means the European Commission means with the European Central Bank. We have to work on those biases. We have to have the meetings. We really have to participate in the process of developing this sustainability indicators that ESMA is doing. We have to demand to meet with them, visit together with a Bitcoin mining community and with the experts on our side and address this issue, address this bias, and really explain to them our position and currently they all exist in research.  </p>
<p>00:31:36:17 - 00:32:09:06<br>Bota<br>You know, right now when, when you say something that that bitcoin mining is actually can be helpful for the adoption of the renewable it's actually facilitated adoption of these renewable this is something that nobody knows about it in the EU and we have to come with miners from all over the world. We really need to bring miners in from Africa and demonstrate how they work there very successfully.  </p>
<p>00:32:09:08 - 00:32:40:14<br>Bota<br>And they not only facility IT adoption of renewables, they actually provide people with work there. They create electricity for the communities that otherwise would have not had electricity. And this issue is extremely important for the European Union. And we also have to work at the level of the member states. Don't forget, the European Union's is a is it 27 countries, Red has 27 countries members, but we don't have to work with all of them.  </p>
<p>00:32:40:14 - 00:33:17:03<br>Bota<br>But there are five key countries that really affect the both the energy policy and the environmental policy. And we have to work with the regulators there and we have to work with the parliaments there. So this is the best time to start. We really should have started two years ago. But, you know, we just hope that everyone understands that the issue is quite pressing and we have to jump into it.  </p>
<p>00:33:17:06 - 00:33:41:23<br>Marty<br>And so what can anybody listening to this do to help you guys? And so as we talk about particularly this show, a lot of people that listen to the show are completely disenchanted from politics, whether it's here in the U.S. or the EU, myself included, to a certain extent, like I have this presupposition that the governments have too much control.  </p>
<p>00:33:41:24 - 00:34:08:09<br>Marty<br>They like that control and they're not going to give it up. But you to have been doing a good job over the last week, you see me that again, these rights need to be defended. And we have seen here in the United States when the government tries to overstepped its bounds and infringe on bitcoiners rights to to use Bitcoin in particular ways that we have submitted comments to FinCEN, the Treasury basically saying, hey, this is way out of line.  </p>
<p>00:34:08:09 - 00:34:31:01<br>Marty<br>They have reacted positively. And I know the answer to this because we discussed it last week. But I think for anybody who didn't hear that conversation, be valuable for them to hear it now, do you have confidence that if action is taken to educate the EU politicians that proof of work could be saved in the EU?  </p>
<p>00:34:31:03 - 00:34:56:27<br>Lyuda<br>Yeah, I think we have all actually chances that we can protect for proof of work and the way how we do it through submissions, through face to face meetings. So what kind of submission, for example, we've done to FinCEN, we collected testimonials of all human rights defenders and basically met with the Treasurer, met with State Department and explain them.  </p>
<p>00:34:56:27 - 00:35:26:09<br>Lyuda<br>Of course you can have some ground to say that this instrument can be used by criminals, but please take into consideration that enormous amount of people financially excluded in most of countries is a very tiny state. We have no other tools and we need to have mutual land which talks to technology and we provide it's all set of recommendations, including actually travel, rule reform and other things, which are what you mentioned during our discussion.  </p>
<p>00:35:26:09 - 00:35:52:02<br>Lyuda<br>What has to be changed. This is the first things. The second thing we want to do the same what we've done, for example, providing our testimonials of Bitcoin and miners and Bitcoin miners for humanity, for human rights defenders and Bitcoin miners to EU institutions. We need do the same in the US. So the also know who are and what is exactly social impact of bitcoin mining.  </p>
<p>00:35:52:02 - 00:36:17:20<br>Lyuda<br>Why it's important because we have no they don't see difference between proof of stake and proof of work. This is something with not enough to be said just in podcast, but it has to be written in the language and dependable for regulators, which we afterwards could refer as a personal testimonial. So witness the statements of those who actually and users of Bitcoin, those who benefit from proof of work.  </p>
<p>00:36:17:22 - 00:36:46:16<br>Lyuda<br>And these testimonials. Everyone who is listening to this podcast from where no matter where you are from, please reach us out and we will help you to shape these testimonials in a framework understandable for regulators. And it will one more step to defend human rights and the proof of work actually in institutions. And it's doable. It's absolutely doable because we heard many times business voices of miners.  </p>
<p>00:36:46:16 - 00:37:10:03<br>Lyuda<br>We ready to hear them. So we have this view. We are very positive on this. Of course, it doesn't matter that there are no better actors. There are better actress because this false narrative exist. Someone created them. Right? But if we don't try to combine them, we will not dismiss them. They will be the only one in this area.  </p>
<p>00:37:10:06 - 00:37:35:03<br>Lyuda<br>And the third thing, we need to have capacity. We need is a non-governmental organization, a nonprofit organization to have support, any kind of support, volunteers, financial support, whatever. We are happy to cooperate and be a platform for voices as we always been for 15 years to EU and U.S. regulators and defend the only tool we have for financial freedom right now.  </p>
<p>00:37:35:05 - 00:38:05:18<br>Bota<br>Yeah, and I just would like to add that we hear it a lot, that there's nothing can be done. We don't trust politicians. You know, politicians are cruel, Politics is dirty. And for us, it's very frustrating to to to hear is that in in the US and in the European Union because we believe this is you have all the instruments you really have to get engage into activism.  </p>
<p>00:38:05:20 - 00:38:43:16<br>Bota<br>And you know, there are certain forms of activism and for some reason, for a lot of people it creates kind of created some kind of negative connotation. But it's something that this is how you can directly affect the policies. If you are quiet, why you you should think that the government should act in your best interest. You have to show that you are a citizen, you are a voter, you have a position, you organize yourself and you bring all this issues to the table of the regulators.  </p>
<p>00:38:43:18 - 00:39:13:12<br>Bota<br>And we really we have activists dying to have that literally dying, right? We just had this horrible tragedy with Navalny in Russia, dying in prison, but being killed in prison. And we have activists, opposition politicians in prisons all over the world just to have and they are all fighting to have the right to kind of influence the policies of their countries.  </p>
<p>00:39:13:14 - 00:39:44:03<br>Bota<br>And you have that right. It's already right given to you by the Constitution and existing laws. And for some reason you prefer to ignore it and just not do much. Please, guys, wake up. We have a chance. We have a really serious fighting chance. And we have to defend this technology, this technology that it's not only technologies that bring in money to you, but this is technologies that saves lives.  </p>
<p>00:39:44:06 - 00:39:52:04<br>Bota<br>And that's why we're willing to fight. We have the skin in the game. So we want you to join our fight.  </p>
<p>00:39:52:06 - 00:40:12:11<br>Marty<br>And what is your hope in the long run that Bitcoin succeeds? Let's say we're successful at defending proof of work, at defending the right to hold your own keys and to transact as privately as possible. What does the world look like in your mind on the other side of successes against encroachments from the state?  </p>
<p>00:40:12:14 - 00:40:37:17<br>Lyuda<br>My success it no one's personal financial data would not be able to use to torture people to kidnap the one day I would not be wake up like I was wake up in 2018 by Botha saying that your brother was taken as a hostage because of weaponization of my. And you've been in data by three regimes. I hope it'll never, ever happen to anyone.  </p>
<p>00:40:37:19 - 00:41:07:23<br>Lyuda<br>And we would be able to manage our financial freedoms. We would have decentralized financial tool. I hope that people will understand that money, responsibility. It's also knowledge that you should eliminate around yourself and financial literacy. And this is something your responsibility, not someone has to do it. If you enjoy financial freedom, if you enjoy any kind of freedom, that means that someone did this job centuries or maybe years ago.  </p>
<p>00:41:07:23 - 00:41:19:19<br>Lyuda<br>And we right now doing the same in our countries and European Union and the US. It's a safe countries for us, and Bitcoin is the only instrument for us and that's why we defend it here.  </p>
<p>00:41:19:21 - 00:41:48:20<br>Bota<br>Well, yeah, and we will be able I for me with this instrument and this is something that Bitcoin will will mainstream, right. Which is very important for us because then it will become an instrument for the civil society. And so as a civil society, we will be able to raise financing to finance position in the countries where the banking system and basically create sort of is I should provide this as well.  </p>
<p>00:41:48:27 - 00:42:13:17<br>Bota<br>They're just instruments of law enforcement, all those countries. Right. And they spy on people rather than being neutral institutions. So we believe that we believe in in Bitcoin, we believe in its power and we believe the civil society around the world should adopt it.  </p>
<p>00:42:13:19 - 00:42:26:22<br>Marty<br>Let's dive into that example of the government using your banking information not to kidnap your brother. But what like just to give an example of how this happened, what happened.  </p>
<p>00:42:26:24 - 00:43:04:13<br>Bota<br>A concrete example is that I live in Belgium. I have political asylum in Kazakhstan because of the work I was doing defending political prisoners and politically persecuted people and victims of torture. They were constantly attacking. Musee tried to extradite me twice from Belgium. It didn't work, so they tried to kidnap me from Belgium and three people were actually sentenced in Belgium, two Germans and one Russian, thanks to the Belgium Federal police.  </p>
<p>00:43:04:15 - 00:43:26:01<br>Bota<br>But it didn't work. So what what the government of Kazakhstan did they send a request is that it's called the Mutual Legal assistance request request for the information. And they got my banking data in banking data. What is like think about what you have on your bank statement. You have all the information and you have all your contacts, basically.  </p>
<p>00:43:26:03 - 00:44:02:07<br>Bota<br>Right. And They really can figure out who is your doctor, where you go, where you stay. If you travel, this is in and they can figure out you, even your family contacts, because because of their transfers. Right. And they looked at my bank account and they realized that that the way how they they realize that I have a weak point and this is my family in Kazakhstan and my brothers and my older brother my parents lived there at that time and my older brother.  </p>
<p>00:44:02:10 - 00:44:42:28<br>Bota<br>And one day they just came, arrested my brother and accuse him and my new wandering, which is was absolutely baseless. And then they they said that we will we're going to release you if you make your sister to go back to Kazakhstan. And my brother refused and he was tortured for two months and all the now it's only because of interference of the Western politicians, the members of the European Parliament, members of the Senate and Congress are in the end of the day, my brother was released and he managed to leave the country.  </p>
<p>00:44:43:01 - 00:44:52:07<br>Bota<br>But basically that's that's how it works. That's how the abuse of anti-money laundering regulation is happening.  </p>
<p>00:44:52:10 - 00:45:13:21<br>Marty<br>And it's insane. I'm sorry, had to go through that, number one. But it's just insane to me. And this is probably why I don't like engaging in politics. It's because everything that the government does, I'm a big free markets, anti-government. I think the government makes everything worse. They print money and throw it at things that don't make sense.  </p>
<p>00:45:13:21 - 00:45:53:29<br>Marty<br>They write these draconian laws as it pertains to KYC, AML, like since 1971. I believe in the Bank Secrecy Act here in the United States, I think is the core of a lot of these problems that exist in the world of data collection for financial transactions stems from that law. Everything since then, it's just gotten worse. And despite the fact that all the KYC, AML Regulation, all the travel rule regulation, the in a hyper digitalized world has only gotten more and more stringent their ability to actually stop crime and money laundering has gotten worse and worse.  </p>
<p>00:45:53:29 - 00:46:26:02<br>Marty<br>I think something like 0.1 percent of global money laundering is prevented by KYC, AML regulations and compliance, actually catching people that are laundering money. It's completely ineffective. And as you just explained, like collecting this and holding it in securely and holding it in a way where despotic, authoritarian governments can request that information at a moment's notice. And you have to deliver it due to the information sharing that comes with complying with the travel rule.  </p>
<p>00:46:26:07 - 00:46:54:19<br>Marty<br>You can you just put a lot of people in harm's way. And there's this obsession with personal identifying information collection that the governments have that is completely counterproductive to the goals that they're claiming they want to achieve, which is reducing financial harm. And they're actually increasing physical harm by trying to reduce the financial crimes, which it's just like, All right, guys, this obviously isn't working.  </p>
<p>00:46:54:23 - 00:47:17:06<br>Marty<br>You have to figure out a better way, become better police and investigators to stop actual crime. You don't throw the baby out with the bathwater and just do a wide swath mass surveillance of everybody and put everybody at risk. Like, that's the point we're getting to. And despite the failure of these policies to actually stop, the crimes are claiming they want to stop.  </p>
<p>00:47:17:06 - 00:47:26:10<br>Marty<br>They keep doubling, tripling, quadrupling down to the point where they want a digital I.D., which is just gonna make things much worse.  </p>
<p>00:47:26:13 - 00:48:01:00<br>Bota<br>It's coming. It's coming as digital IDs, currency BTC is coming. It was actually you will be surprised how it's very much welcome and embraced by authoritarian countries, which gives you a little bit information how it's going to be misused. And again, unless we see something, unless we resist, unless we limit the ability of the government to implement those policies, nothing will change.  </p>
<p>00:48:01:02 - 00:48:26:17<br>Bota<br>Sorry, Martin. No, this is why if it's you can hate the government as much as you want, but this is the existing evil, right? It's necessary. Evil. Yeah. And it's easy to hate it when you you enjoy certain security, right? You enjoy protection of the of the your property rights. But in the world of countries, people don't enjoy that.  </p>
<p>00:48:26:19 - 00:48:37:01<br>Bota<br>They don't have this privilege. So you are lucky and you have all of the privileges. You should use them to defend your rights.  </p>
<p>00:48:37:03 - 00:49:02:03<br>Lyuda<br>Yeah, exactly. You cannot do safely even this kind of discussion in the threatening states. We just all will be killed or will be paid in prison or will be tortured or sentenced for many years. You know, our families will be taken as hostages. The difference between authoritarian states and democracies, no matter how we love them or not to hate them, that we have tools and we can operate safely like relative safety.  </p>
<p>00:49:02:03 - 00:49:29:04<br>Lyuda<br>Of course there is always certain anyways backfire, but anyways, it's a I can conduct advocacy and have this open dialog with regulators and legislators can criticize them saying that guys, your regulation is killing me. Please help me. Please actually introduce my recommendations. And they doing it while for example, in the three Italian states I would not even able to share a post on Facebook or like this kind of information.  </p>
<p>00:49:29:12 - 00:49:52:09<br>Lyuda<br>This is enough to basically eliminate me and this is the reality. So it's about our choice just to complain or just to take this power what you have because because you are citizens of you, because you are citizens of us, Canada and other democracies, and actually say, Hi guys, you represent my interests and I'm not angry with you.  </p>
<p>00:49:52:11 - 00:50:05:28<br>Lyuda<br>Actually, I want to use Bitcoin as a legitimate instrument. You don't understand what is proof of work, what is P2P transactions, what is social good for? Listen to me and they will listen to you. And this is your power.  </p>
<p>00:50:06:00 - 00:50:36:25<br>Marty<br>And going back to what you said earlier about narrative being very powerful, that's one thing I think Bitcoiners have gotten wise on, particularly in the last 5 to 6 years, is you got to tell better stories. It's very important in this information battle that we're in because at the end of the day, this is really what we're engaged in, is an information warfare for the hearts and minds of the individuals who will either step up to defend their rights or let the government and the regulators run over them.  </p>
<p>00:50:36:27 - 00:51:16:22<br>Marty<br>And that's why I think the act of the activism that you two are engaged is extremely powerful because it's somewhat of an ironclad narrative. Like Bitcoin literally saves lives and protects people from authoritarian governments. And I think that's something as an industry, we've gotten better at, but really need to perfect this narrative to the masses, which is an optimistic future, a future of abundance, a future of equality of opportunity, equality of access, equality of being able to attain a monetary good that is not debased will preserve your purchasing power over time.  </p>
<p>00:51:16:22 - 00:51:41:21<br>Marty<br>There's very good optimistic lines that we can run with that that paint a very optimistic future with Bitcoin at the center of it, whether it's the open source network, the scarce money supply or the integration of the mining industry with the energy sector making it more robust so more people can have access to more reliable, cheaper energy. I think they're.  </p>
<p>00:51:41:24 - 00:51:42:22<br>Lyuda<br>Exactly.  </p>
<p>00:51:42:24 - 00:52:12:16<br>Bota<br>Exactly. And just one little thing I would like to add. It's please, please don't paint all the politicians with one black paint. You know, it's not only people that really, truly believe in human rights, that truly believe in financial freedom, that truly believe in economic freedom, that try to limit the like in fighting against, you know, kind of growing interference of the state.  </p>
<p>00:52:12:18 - 00:52:34:18<br>Bota<br>You have to find them and you have to help those people because you kind of you are a power that feeds them. You have to have all the data that we need on our side. We just really have to bring that this data to the right people, and that will be their weapon and they will be fighting for us as well.  </p>
<p>00:52:34:20 - 00:52:46:21<br>Marty<br>Yeah, we can't have Alex of years. The Dutch central bank minion in his terribly written paper for the Dutch economist or whatever it's called.  </p>
<p>00:52:46:23 - 00:52:46:28<br>Bota<br>It's.  </p>
<p>00:52:46:29 - 00:53:21:00<br>Lyuda<br>You know we need to have changes in one of the most I would say like books organization Interpol. So we signification which unites all ministries of interiors of the world. Of course, most of the Ministry of Interior of the world does have to be Italian. But nevertheless, we fight for reform. And actually, again, I would say that abuses of this important police instrument instrument, worse things to actually open doors from the anti-money laundering counter-terrorism regulations.  </p>
<p>00:53:21:00 - 00:53:45:03<br>Lyuda<br>So this is the first stage how all politically motivated accusations happening on this basis. And then the police institution, US banking data is easily given to it or to handful of dictators. So we succeed to do reform of this institution. So we strongly believe that we can do changes altered the everyone was laughing at us saying, oh, you girls, you going to change this?  </p>
<p>00:53:45:03 - 00:54:11:18<br>Lyuda<br>You see in this room only like, you know, privileged to ministries from all of this dictatorship, do we think they will listen to you. But we luckily had voices and support of legislators, democratic countries who, as what I said, really believe in human rights. And we did it. We did it. It's fucked. So right now you have clear procedure how to defend your rights, not be in this black box.  </p>
<p>00:54:11:18 - 00:54:33:19<br>Lyuda<br>And even if you became a victim of abuse of Interpol, you have clear procedures how to remove yourself from there and even to demand compensation. We have to do the same with abuses of anti money immigration. We have to do the same with protecting labeling Bitcoin with any kind of war on these false accusations.  </p>
<p>00:54:33:21 - 00:55:09:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah, maybe these politicians that I'm talking about about that want to do not bad things necessarily, but want more control. Maybe they depend on the complacency of the average Joe of the common man to just sit there like, oh, it's fine to be like, hey, if they're not going to do anything, we're going to take these rights. I think that's a big problem we have here in the West, specifically the United States is the populace here has become a bit complacent, literally felt a bit dumber, complacent, resting on our laurels, that just a lot of people to sit by and get pushed around and they'll complain on social media but really don't do anything.  </p>
<p>00:55:10:03 - 00:55:16:28<br>Marty<br>At the end of the day, that's one of the biggest killers of freedom is apathy. Complacency.  </p>
<p>00:55:17:01 - 00:55:23:19<br>Bota<br>Yes. And as a person who was once on the Interpol most wanted list.  </p>
<p>00:55:23:22 - 00:55:27:29<br>Marty<br>That he take pride in that that's pretty bad ass.  </p>
<p>00:55:28:01 - 00:55:52:18<br>Bota<br>I confirm everything with you that just said and but it happens to many of us because this is you know, people don't realize how is it Interpol works? Is the bulletin board right. And any authoritarian regime with dictatorship can just put your name and voila, you're wanted by everyone. It was the kind of institutions that was easily, easily abused.  </p>
<p>00:55:52:21 - 00:55:58:06<br>Bota<br>But we changed the narrative. And so we can do the same with Bitcoin even more.  </p>
<p>00:55:58:10 - 00:56:26:07<br>Lyuda<br>You complain about democracies, right? So I've had this case, one or three countries which actually abuse my rights and again, abuse anti-money laundering, counter-terrorism regulation. It was Poland and, you know, Poland is a member of European Union. Right. It gets really strongly to the side of authoritarian regimes is seen the contrary right now. But in like six years they were classified to me as a threat to national security.  </p>
<p>00:56:26:10 - 00:57:01:06<br>Lyuda<br>I'm not joking. Like special services of Poland classified me as a threat to national security with no ground, and I was banned to enter EU for two weeks until the moment when parliaments of Germany, Belgium, France and many other institutions President Macron, president of Germany, stand on and my rights. Also former Prime minister of Belgium. And they granted me well, I'm a threat to national security in Poland, national interest in their countries, and we succeed to change not do we succeed to actually is false.  </p>
<p>00:57:01:06 - 00:57:29:07<br>Lyuda<br>How authoritarian regimes or democracies which started to abuse their power, able to manipulate, you know, the threat national security accusations towards two critical or critical critics, critical people like me. And we change it. So now everyone who is treated in the same way, like me, they have a number of protection tools, they have remedies, and they can easily defend their rights.  </p>
<p>00:57:29:10 - 00:57:56:00<br>Lyuda<br>And I not only defend defended rights of myself, I actually, together with my team, established a mechanism which was adopted and supported by many human rights legislators and regulators in the EU. So it's again, one more example, but everything is doable and we have a lot of tools in our heads, but we need not just to complain in social media, we need to come to meet with them and say, This is my proposals, this is my argumentation.  </p>
<p>00:57:56:03 - 00:58:06:27<br>Lyuda<br>And if you are, stick with argumentation, you go to defend your position. We prove it so many times and we happy to do it to actually defend Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:58:06:29 - 00:58:50:23<br>Bota<br>Unfortunately, we cannot do all of those things without help. We need we need the community behind us and we really need people to get engaged because to do this type of changes, you need a lot a lot of participations from basically not only from activists. That part, you know, we know how to speak with activist and activists, ready to fight, but we need help from Bitcoin miners, from industry experts that will come and meet with the regulators, meet with the politicians and be willing to provide their testimonies.  </p>
<p>00:58:50:23 - 00:58:53:18<br>Bota<br>And then we can do a lot of things.  </p>
<p>00:58:53:20 - 00:59:04:00<br>Marty<br>Yeah, you guys are pretty badass. Interpol's most wanted is fighting back against all these governments, and.  </p>
<p>00:59:04:01 - 00:59:11:02<br>Bota<br>That's why I was removed from the database when Interpol realized that was politically motivated.  </p>
<p>00:59:11:05 - 00:59:18:11<br>Lyuda<br>And I'm also not a threat to national security anymore. I'm not classified anymore. And they let us apologize.  </p>
<p>00:59:18:13 - 00:59:39:09<br>Marty<br>Because I have a lot of stories to tell. This is going to be it's going to be fun decades from now. When we look back, Bitcoin is succeeded. We've we've rolled out a lot of the evil in the world and it was hey, yeah, I was I was on the Interpol most wanted list. I can't say that here in America, they have not come anywhere close to that list.  </p>
<p>00:59:39:12 - 01:00:02:00<br>Marty<br>It's pretty badass, you guys. I mean, it's pretty heavy. Everything you're working on, putting yourself in the crosshairs of a lot of very powerful governments around the world. How what keeps you going? How does the stress how do you not succumb to the stress of all the things you do?  </p>
<p>01:00:02:02 - 01:00:31:25<br>Bota<br>Sometimes it can be extremely, extremely difficult. Especially, you know, it's it's not the difficult part is not dealing with the democratic regulators or members of the parliament. Difficult part for me, the most difficult part when we work on the cases of torture, that probably the most difficult, emotionally draining and we have a lot of unfortunately, we have a lot of experience of working in those cases.  </p>
<p>01:00:31:27 - 01:00:57:22<br>Bota<br>And, you know, sometimes we need even professional help like ceremonies because it it's it's very hard. You you know, it takes time for a person to start talking for a victim of torture. And you have to go with him through it step by step, step by step to kind of to get all this information on paper. It's it's extremely painful.  </p>
<p>01:00:57:22 - 01:01:37:04<br>Bota<br>And then that haunts you for a long time. But I think we we do it because we really you kind of you feel this internal gratification. You understand why it's important to you see how you change your life. You see how you change your life not only of that person, but that person's family members. We have a job as a support that that is very important from, you know, our community activities.  </p>
<p>01:01:37:07 - 01:01:57:15<br>Bota<br>You know, we never work on any issue, so we always have a group of people coalition. So we work on this Bitcoin advocacy issue as a coalition, but on other subjects we work as different coalitions as well. So that helps kind of a network.  </p>
<p>01:01:57:18 - 01:02:28:00<br>Lyuda<br>Yeah, exactly. In my case, I used to have experience as a teenager how it's so important that there are people defending ready to come in to defend your family member who is taken as a hostage because of not agreeing to, for example, corrupt deals or for criticizing the government. And we see this light in the tunnel. And someone said, yeah, no worries, you can actually meet your brother in the hospital he's back from being taken hostage.  </p>
<p>01:02:28:00 - 01:02:55:22<br>Lyuda<br>And I think the most difficult for all of this case is when our relative suffers. And I wanted to be seen that time, this kind of hope just to other people who needed help and actually to provide this help. So I think this is something no matter what's happened with me, I tried to actually to overcome it. It's easier when it's something happened with me, actually, because I also this myself from my case.  </p>
<p>01:02:55:24 - 01:03:22:12<br>Lyuda<br>It's not easy. It's just like easier when your relatives are taken as a hostage. I think what I will agree with me that you can actually, as a person responsible for your activity, overcome difficulties, you know, what kind of mechanism you have, but you feel completely powerless sometimes when your family members, your close people are taken as a hostage and you need to release you need to do all efforts because I think the most difficult.  </p>
<p>01:03:22:14 - 01:03:55:11<br>Marty<br>Yeah, yeah. Again I can't imagine that. I mean, being an American, not having to really put myself out there to that extent. I mean, yes, I have a podcast and a newsletter and website where we do talk bad about the government, their policies and all that. And I luckily, despite whether or not I believe America is as free as it maybe should be, I do have the ability to do this without having to worry about any of that.  </p>
<p>01:03:55:11 - 01:04:15:23<br>Marty<br>So it is something that I and certainly many other Americans definitely take for granted. And it's really grounding to speak with you to learn more about your experiences, because it is insane that people have to go through this on a daily basis all throughout the world.  </p>
<p>01:04:15:25 - 01:04:39:28<br>Lyuda<br>Yes. And most of the countries are authoritarian. So what are you doing? Actually, I would not say that. It's absolutely you know, it's important work because you you criticize, you see, you have a right to criticize and you exercising your rights. Now, do one step more, actually try to extract from those who represent your interests, even if you don't like them, that they follow actually your recommendations and you can do it.  </p>
<p>01:04:40:02 - 01:04:57:25<br>Lyuda<br>You have all instruments in your hands and we are happy to actually assist and be this platform, say who is actually pro human rights because we work for them, for them for over 15 years and we happy to do it both in us and you. And I'm sure that we can do beautiful things together.  </p>
<p>01:04:57:27 - 01:04:59:13<br>Marty<br>I agree we're going to win.  </p>
<p>01:04:59:15 - 01:05:01:28<br>Lyuda<br>But we have to. We don't have other chance.  </p>
<p>01:05:02:00 - 01:05:17:11<br>Marty<br>We have to work. And with that mind, is there anything we didn't touch on that we should touch on Before we wrap up? Any information you think is pertinent, then anybody listening to this has access to any calls to action.  </p>
<p>01:05:17:14 - 01:05:38:03<br>Lyuda<br>I mean, call to action. Support us. And remember, guys, everyone who is developing more and more access to both freedom to financial freedom tools for such people, like we love you, really, we love you and we want you to actually support it as much as possible. Bring your technologies. We need to litigate as much as possible people. We want to define proof of work.  </p>
<p>01:05:38:06 - 01:05:44:01<br>Lyuda<br>We know how to do it. Let us do it together. Give us your testimonials, give us your support, and let's do it together.  </p>
<p>01:05:44:04 - 01:06:00:03<br>Bota<br>And when you see that Bitcoin is an instrument of freedom, remember us. It is an instrument of freedom. And really we need you your help to defend this instrument. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:06:00:05 - 01:06:34:04<br>Marty<br>Let's do it for we're going to link to both your profile is in the show notes, link to your website and get active freaks, whether it's in the EU, the global audience, and EU freaks listening to this, right? Yes. Let's get active. Yes. And here in the United States, send your submissions and pushback. Yeah. I think that FinCEN the FinCEN comments that went through last month are yet to be determined whether or not they convinced the government to to back off of what the Treasury would like to do.  </p>
<p>01:06:34:04 - 01:06:45:22<br>Marty<br>But we shall see. I think it was very powerful. Let's keep doing it, engage where it makes sense and just bring. That's the thing. We have the data on our side. We have the truth on our side.  </p>
<p>01:06:45:24 - 01:06:48:13<br>Bota<br>Yeah, Yeah. We need to bring that data.  </p>
<p>01:06:48:15 - 01:06:49:11<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>01:06:49:14 - 01:07:08:09<br>Lyuda<br>So and one last thing. If you are in my day and if you are BTC Prague conference, reach us out. We are happy to meet you guys in life and I think more people from us has to come to you because otherwise we have limited capacity to come to us. So we would love to meet you in person and get the testimonies.  </p>
<p>01:07:08:09 - 01:07:21:02<br>Lyuda<br>We will do meetings. Last time we did it in Prague. Also meetings in the Parliament. We will try to organize things also this time. So we would love to reach out.  </p>
<p>01:07:21:04 - 01:07:25:03<br>Marty<br>Let's go. All right, Berta, Ludo, thank you for your time.  </p>
<p>01:07:25:03 - 01:07:27:28<br>Lyuda<br>Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.  </p>
<p>01:07:27:28 - 01:07:31:01<br>Marty<br>Keep crushing at peace and love for speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[Scrib]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/freedom-fighters-need-bitcoin/">Read original post</a></p>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<p>The latest episode of the podcast brought to light the pressing issue of bitcoin mining regulation, focusing on the scrutiny it faces from regulators in both the European Union (EU) and the United States (US). The guests, human rights defenders Lyudmyla Kozlovska and Bota Jardemalie, shared their personal experiences and the critical role bitcoin plays as a life-saving tool for activists living under authoritarian regimes.</p>
<p>The conversation delved into the potential proof of work ban in the EU and its implications. Luda, the founder of Open Dialogue Foundation, a nonpartisan human rights organization, highlighted the vital importance of bitcoin as a financial tool when traditional banking services are weaponized by authoritarian states. This has led to severe consequences, including the torture and imprisonment of activists.</p>
<p>Bota, also a human rights defender and lawyer, emphasized the negative perceptions of bitcoin mining, painting it as both an environmental threat and a security risk. They discussed the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) efforts to develop sustainability indicators for crypto assets, which could lead to a de facto ban on proof of work by discouraging investment in assets deemed unsustainable.</p>
<p>The guests also touched on similar concerns in the US, where the Energy Information Administration is collecting data on crypto miners' energy usage, potentially leading to biased reports and unjust regulatory action. Marty, the host, expressed concern over the misguided narrative that bitcoin is primarily used for nefarious purposes, countering that it is a tool for freedom and economic empowerment.</p>
<p>Lyuda and Bota called for collective action to change the narrative and educate regulators about the positive impact of bitcoin, especially for those defending human rights. They stressed the importance of presenting personal testimonials to EU and US officials and the need for community support to continue their advocacy work.</p>
<h3>Sponsors</h3>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://app.zaprite.com/?utm_source=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/zaprite-tftc-40off-600x150@2x.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/Find-Talent-2400x1350.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h3>Best Quotes</h3>
<ol>
<li>"For us, bitcoin is something death and life tool saving life too, while, for example, we don't have privileges like most of people living in democratic countries." - Lyuda</li>
<li>"We, as the end users of bitcoin, we realize that it's absolutely necessary to defend bitcoin and specifically proof of work in the European Union." - Bota</li>
<li>"It's particularly interesting that right now, Europe particularly, and even the US, to a certain extent, have began using bias and discriminating against bitcoin mining at a time when both our energy systems are relatively weak." - Marty</li>
<li>"If you enjoy financial freedom, if you enjoy any kind of freedom, that means that someone did this job centuries or maybe years ago, and we right now doing the same in our countries and European Union and the US." - Lyuda</li>
<li>"Rights aren't granted. They're taken and defended." - Marty</li>
<li>"We believe in bitcoin, we believe in its power and we believe that the civil society around the world should adopt it." - Bota</li>
</ol>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>The discussion underscored the urgency with which the bitcoin community must come together to protect the core principles that make bitcoin a powerful tool for human rights. The potential regulations targeting proof of work and peer-to-peer transactions pose a significant threat not just to the cryptocurrency industry but to the very essence of financial freedom that bitcoin represents.</p>
<p>The personal stories shared by Lyuda and Bota serve as a stark reminder that for many around the world, bitcoin is more than a financial asset; it's a lifeline. The overarching message of the episode is a call to action for bitcoin users, miners, and advocates to unite in educating and influencing policymakers. The episode concludes with a sense of cautious optimism, a belief that through collective effort and strategic activism, the freedoms that bitcoin facilitates can be preserved and expanded for the benefit of all.</p>
<h3>Timestamps</h3>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>8:00 - EU attacks on Bitcoin<br>18:58 - Abuse of KYC/AML<br>25:10 - Confronting regulators about their consequences<br>37:45 - Timeline on preventing EU action<br>41:15 - What can be done<br>47:52 - What does the success of Bitcoin look like<br>50:11 - What it’s like when they come for you<br>52:50 - The laws are more draconian and less effective<br>58:04 - Narrative war<br>1:02:31 - Complacency<br>1:07:39 - Dealing with the stress<br>1:12:55 - Wrapping up</p>
<h3>Transcript</h3>
<p>00:00:02:05 - 00:00:05:05<br>Marty<br>Botha and Luda. Welcome to the show.  </p>
<p>00:00:05:07 - 00:00:07:18<br>Lyuda<br>Hello. Hello, everyone. Thank you.  </p>
<p>00:00:07:24 - 00:00:38:05<br>Marty<br>Witness Thank you for coming on. It's been nice getting to know you too over the last month or so, I guess a little. We met in Nashville at the Energy and Mining Summit, which was really cool event and it was really cool to have you there, considering what you guys are working on in the EU. And I guess the topic of today is regulators both in the EU and now the U.S. really focusing on Bitcoin mining as something that needs to be taken care of.  </p>
<p>00:00:38:05 - 00:01:00:21<br>Marty<br>And you two are on the front lines in the EU to make sure that there isn't a proof of work ban throughout the European Union, which is on the table right now. So I guess I can just start with what is going on in the European Union. Why have they honed in on proof of work and what could happen if nothing is done in the next few months?  </p>
<p>00:01:00:24 - 00:01:32:05<br>Lyuda<br>Yeah, allow me maybe to start a bit. Also introducing myself why we together with water and other activists, are doing this work. So first of all, I'm human defender. I am the president and founder of Open Dialog Foundation. This is a human rights organization, international nonpartisan and nonprofit organization. And we became a victim, a target of attack, coordinated attack of a three ton regime back in 2008 in the course of our human rights work on international level.  </p>
<p>00:01:32:08 - 00:02:11:23<br>Lyuda<br>So we had all protection like political protection, even President Macron of Germany, parliaments of France, Belgium, Germany and many others supported us. And with all of this protection, we were not able to be protected financially. So regimes were able to weaponize our banking data, basically depriving them the right to have financial services in the heart of Europe. And this is the reason why we discovered and use Bitcoin as a tool to resist against transnational repression when authoritarian regimes abuse, financial action, task force recommendations and the group you all financial data to prosecute your donors and recipients of the funds.  </p>
<p>00:02:11:26 - 00:02:35:26<br>Lyuda<br>As a consequence, our volunteers and our human rights defenders in the authoritarian states were tortured, disappeared or were in prison for many years. So for us, Bitcoin is something death and life tool saving life tool. Well, for example, we don't have privileges like most of people living in democratic countries. And this is a reason why we educate regulators.  </p>
<p>00:02:35:29 - 00:03:08:04<br>Lyuda<br>This is the reason why we defend proof of work which actually can guarantee us as a human right defenders financially excluded people the use of financial tool as a payment and this fundraising instrument and this is the reason why also my colleague both time when you are the activist of a building to change coalition, we bring this topic hearing all the time questions why you use Bitcoin, why you use this instrument if it's associated with the energy and actually security threats, it can harm environment.  </p>
<p>00:03:08:04 - 00:03:19:26<br>Lyuda<br>It's actually dangerous for our energy security. And I think what I will mention actually what exactly we address right now.  </p>
<p>00:03:19:28 - 00:03:55:16<br>Bota<br>Yeah. Thank you, Linda. Yeah, I'm a human rights defender and a lawyer, and we've been working together with Luke Muir for many, many years, for almost 15 years. And right now is one of the issues that we are working is this is what we call Bitcoin advocacy. So we is the end users of Bitcoin. We realize that that's absolutely necessary to defend Bitcoin and specifically proof of work in the European Union started with the European Union.  </p>
<p>00:03:55:16 - 00:04:25:17<br>Bota<br>But I would go to the US after. So what you'd already mentioned when we were bombarded with this questions how you use technologies that is bad for the environment, that is energy wasting. And so we started looking where this information is coming from, what's happening at the EU level. And we realize that there are two kind of major attack on Bitcoin consensus mechanism of on proof of work right?  </p>
<p>00:04:25:19 - 00:04:56:08<br>Bota<br>First of all, this is perceived by the regulator, by the European Commission, by the European Securities and Markets Authority, by the European Central Bank as energy based in mechanisms that is dangerous for the European Energy security and as well as there is an attack, that it's extremely dangerous technology for the environment, that it has a very high carbon footprint.  </p>
<p>00:04:56:13 - 00:05:23:13<br>Bota<br>So it's bad for the environment. And when we say that this is something that is ban of bit of proof of work is on the table in the European Union, everyone seeing that there will be some kind of views that they would specifically specific language that proof of work is banned since January one. Right. But no, it's not how it works.  </p>
<p>00:05:23:18 - 00:06:04:06<br>Bota<br>The way how it works is that right now, the so-called ESMA Esma is the European Securities and Markets Authority is developing sustainability indicators. So this sustainability indicators for all cryptocurrencies activities and specifically for Bitcoin consensus mechanism. And so as they will be deciding, they will develop a standard. It's what crypto assets, so-called sustainable. So good for the environment or not, at least not bad for the environment.  </p>
<p>00:06:04:08 - 00:06:37:29<br>Bota<br>And what kind of crypto assets are not good, not sustainable. And the problem is that if we look at the narrative that exist, it's everywhere level, all the European Union, we see that there's very, very negative perception of the Bitcoin mining. And I would say there's a student this a really discriminatory treatment in the bias that exist. Is it the institutions?  </p>
<p>00:06:38:02 - 00:07:22:24<br>Bota<br>Because this is something that they are not doing the research asking why, you know, voters, that this is how it's used, etc.. No, they are already specifically created this bias in the information, the sources that they're using. They are something that would have concerns. This is something that is not, you know, peer reviewed literature right now. It's usually something that is some newspaper articles or research reports that were specifically focused on negative externalities of Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:07:22:26 - 00:08:10:06<br>Bota<br>And of course, we worry about this very much. We know that the deadline is coming. It's the 1st of January 2021 or 25, sorry, that European Parliament is expecting a proposal from the European Commission. And so they want to know what kind of group activities consider it to be sustainable and what is not. And if it's something is not sustainable, you have to remember that means that this basically that it's something that they all the institutions, specifically European Central Bank, will create a disincentive to invest into that particular asset.  </p>
<p>00:08:10:08 - 00:08:44:29<br>Bota<br>And that's why it's very dangerous. And we see that the similar trend is happening in the US right now. And this really in parallel because you, you, you probably know that is the EU Energy Information Administration already started collecting information from crypto miners about their energy use and they have specific deadlines by which the information be collected. That's in by the end of July 2024.  </p>
<p>00:08:45:02 - 00:09:12:05<br>Bota<br>And after that, the Energy Information Administration will start publishing its reports. Right. But we already see that there is a certain bias even in the way how they are started to question in the industry about the energy use. So we can see that the developments is happening on both sides of the pot.  </p>
<p>00:09:12:07 - 00:09:38:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it feels like the wall, not the walls, are caving in, but it feels like the pressure is certainly on. And as you too mentioned, there's a ton of bias, a ton of discrimination. It's really disheartening as somebody I've been involved in the mining industry for six years now here in the United States, and it's abundantly clear to me, utilities providers, energy producers, that Bitcoin is additive to their operations.  </p>
<p>00:09:38:29 - 00:10:19:10<br>Marty<br>Bitcoin is just driven by pure economics. Is there Bitcoin mining to take advantage of wasted, stranded energy sources to make these energy systems more efficient to the point where it's enabling producers and utilities companies to reinvest, to build out more reliable infrastructure? And it's particularly interesting that right now Europe particularly, and even the U.S. to a certain extent, have began using bias and discriminating against Bitcoin mining at a time when both our energy systems are relatively weak to where they were only a decade or two ago.  </p>
<p>00:10:19:10 - 00:10:47:11<br>Marty<br>I mean, specifically in Europe, Germany being the prime example of a country that completely destroyed its energy system over the last 20 years and can use all the help it could get. And if action isn't taken in the next few months, they will completely block out a source of energy efficiency in Bitcoin mining that could really help them make their grid systems more stable.  </p>
<p>00:10:47:11 - 00:11:21:23<br>Marty<br>It's really insane. And then on top of that, again, bringing bias and discrimination to it like we see outside of mining this bitcoin in general. The line here in the United States as I'm sure it is in Europe as well, is that bitcoin's only used by criminals, drug users, money launderers. And as you to explain earlier and have shown through your work with human rights activists, like no, it's actually enabling human rights activists to evade despotic governments.  </p>
<p>00:11:21:26 - 00:11:40:20<br>Marty<br>And in fact the KYC, AML regulations that you want to thrust on everybody using a non-custodial wallet put them in danger because the despotic governments use these this information from KYC, AML policies to target dissidents.  </p>
<p>00:11:40:23 - 00:12:31:10<br>Lyuda<br>Yeah, exactly. And I would like to say that with the perspective of what's happening, Wolf, in the US, in you, if you compare this two countries in the US, you at least have voices and very active miners, Bitcoin miners and Bitcoin community who educates regulators. But again, even with this work, when we been last two weeks in the Senate and Congress and also we met with State Department with Financial action task forces, we conducted over 27 meetings in person during this all our advocacy mission in DC the first time heard how anti-money laundering regulation, how Financial Action Task Force's recommendation abused by dictators, how banking data weaponized not only in authoritarian states domestically, but how  </p>
<p>00:12:31:10 - 00:13:10:10<br>Lyuda<br>they actually can be all exposed in democracies. And we conducted the first round table for our CRYPTOASSETS, where we testified about this unfortunate experience and the consequences of this regulation from one side, but from other sites. We provided recommendations and tools we used to resist, again, this transnational repressions, authoritarian regimes, when basically email, emails and safety regulation is used as a transnational tool against the opposition and everyone around us and civil society and human rights activists, even abroad, not only domestically.  </p>
<p>00:13:10:13 - 00:13:38:25<br>Lyuda<br>So we see actually positive attitude. And so, for example, we were asked, okay, guys, what you want? And we said, we want to have neutral language to listen to Bitcoin and proof of work and actually beautiful transactions, privacy instruments like mixers, because we have no other tools. And we got response, okay, we need to then to have this dialog.  </p>
<p>00:13:38:26 - 00:14:01:18<br>Lyuda<br>So if you go to to bring to the miners, for example, who will testify along with you how it operates, will you will you help us to understand it? And I think this is a kind of key, key moment when we can bring voices from one side as end users, those who use this technology. We are not perceived as lobbyists and we are not lobbyists.  </p>
<p>00:14:01:18 - 00:14:23:03<br>Lyuda<br>We just defend our human rights and Bitcoin Bitcoin for us human rights because we don't have other instruments. And for many of us it's a question of life and death. We don't have this privilege to choose. And I'm actually paying today with these credit cards or these credit cards. We just don't have credit cards. These are our reality and this is how we live.  </p>
<p>00:14:23:05 - 00:14:50:15<br>Lyuda<br>So these perspective change narratives and we need to remember that right now narratives are shaping our lives and shaping decision making process of politicians, and we need to have voices. So Bitcoiners from all over the world, because EU is going to approach regulation to mining in a global way as a G7 countries. So once it's adopted in you, they want to use and waterless methodology.  </p>
<p>00:14:50:15 - 00:15:20:14<br>Lyuda<br>Talk to other G7 countries and we don't want to allow any democracy to use in a regulatory language negative association labeling towards to Bitcoin or proof of work of peer to peer transactions or any privacy instruments because it affects our life entirely. Imagine for us the only instrument we have to protect political prisoners, victims of tortures. It's actually to have support of democracies, democratic governments.  </p>
<p>00:15:20:16 - 00:15:45:01<br>Lyuda<br>And this these democratic governments labeled the only instrument we have how to deliver humanitarian aid, how to support families of political prisoners as illicit activity, as a threat to national security, energy security, Environmental Council. That means that all three China is you immediately going to use this against everyone who is using this instrument to receive our help. We don't want it.  </p>
<p>00:15:45:01 - 00:16:11:29<br>Lyuda<br>We don't want it to allow even to happen. And this is the reason why we educate and this is the reason why we try to bring as much as possible awareness, how and why we use Bitcoin as a tool for human rights and humanitarian needs. And when we asked by regulators, okay, so for example, they said, you know, we can shun because criminals are using Bitcoin as the instrument.  </p>
<p>00:16:11:29 - 00:16:38:02<br>Lyuda<br>And of course every technology can be used by better actors and good doctors. But we as the good doctors, we should have a legal way how to use it. You should not punish us because some criminals using these instruments or provide us the instruments to operate in authoritarian states where most of people financially excluded for political reasons and they have no answer what to provide us.  </p>
<p>00:16:38:05 - 00:17:08:26<br>Lyuda<br>And this is a reason why we think it's really important to educate right now when there is huge speed to weather this kind of, you know, this wish to show results quickly, especially before elections in Europe, when the main demand from the society to deal with energy crisis and environmental crisis. And we don't want proof of work and Bitcoin mining be in general just a scapegoat where it's easy to punish this technology because there is no waste in defense.  </p>
<p>00:17:08:29 - 00:17:12:24<br>Lyuda<br>We should not allow this.  </p>
<p>00:17:12:27 - 00:17:15:22<br>Marty<br>No further join Japan.  </p>
<p>00:17:15:27 - 00:18:10:23<br>Bota<br>No, I just, you know, basically covered all ground. But I just want to say that how we present it to the regulator, right, when we see that this this instrument is used by terrorist and money. Money wondrous. Right. But we as activists will been accused in money laundering in the in being members of extremist terrorists are organizations in being a threat to national security by the regimes where we defend human rights and just kind of an example, once we walked into a meeting with people from the commission that were drafting the anti-money laundering regulations and we wanted to discuss this problem of abuses, of this of this language, that that is an instrument of money  </p>
<p>00:18:10:25 - 00:18:36:09<br>Bota<br>and financing of terrorism. First thing we ask, we ask them, Have you ever met a real terrorist or a man? You wonder in their kind of. No, of course not. You know, in our line of business, we don't really meet them. And we said, I'm a man. You wonder and accuse of being mining wanderer and member of an extremist organization.  </p>
<p>00:18:36:17 - 00:19:24:20<br>Bota<br>You there is a threat to national security and money laundering as well. We had with us a person from the Valley Foundation and we said that at that time they were was they were our foreign agents, terrorists and money launderers. And so we had active news from all over the world in one room, and we all were labeled by dictators, by authoritarian regimes, that we are those criminals, but we are normal people and we actually defend human rights and we work with the institutions and we explain what kind of the new whistle blowers about the crimes committed by many regimes.  </p>
<p>00:19:24:23 - 00:19:57:15<br>Bota<br>So when you Liebowitz acknowledges that there's an instrument for money launderers, you you really create this bias. It's exactly how this authoritarian regimes create bias against us. And this is something that we want to fight against. And we have our examples We can explain to the regulator what what is happening. But at the same time, we need people from the industry explaining this side of the story, saying that, you know, this is a regulation, this is how they work.  </p>
<p>00:19:57:17 - 00:20:36:01<br>Bota<br>And if there is an article about this person that is person is committed some crimes, even if it's not proven, it just a pure, a pure, a piece of, you know, fake news. Right. They still going to take your bank account away because of the existing regulations. So what we need to do, we need to have people from the regulated industry and people like us to show the consequences or to the regulators the consequences of their actions, how people like us get financially excluded.  </p>
<p>00:20:36:04 - 00:21:05:09<br>Marty<br>And the really disheartening thing about all of this is the two tiered system that exists. I mean, the amount of money laundering that happens and is facilitated via the U.S. dollar far exceeds anything that Bitcoin does on a day to day, year to year basis or is done historically. And then these same regulators that are really close with the banking and financial industry specifically let these banks get away with murder.  </p>
<p>00:21:05:11 - 00:21:42:04<br>Marty<br>I think sometimes quite literally, but figuratively mainly. I mean, we had Jp morgan settle out of court with the U.S. Virgin Islands. They made a $75 million fine so that they wouldn't have to go to court and have discovery around the fact that Jp morgan was banking Jeffrey Epstein as he was laundering money for sex trafficking operation, obviously, famously, which HSBC in the Mexican drug cartels, they had teller windows that had slots where briefcases full of cash could be pushed through by by the drug cartels.  </p>
<p>00:21:42:04 - 00:22:13:01<br>Marty<br>They paid a small fine for that. And yet here comes Bitcoin, which isn't facilitating a lot of this. Yes, as you mentioned, both criminals can certainly use it, but it's a technology. They drink, water they use to fake security as well. We don't throw these things, make them illegal because terrorists are using them. And it's what I toil with personally and like, are these regulators, is that lazy that they're willing to bring a sledgehammer and smash anything that can be used by a criminal?  </p>
<p>00:22:13:03 - 00:22:41:20<br>Marty<br>Or are they more nefarious where they recognize the freedom that Bitcoin enables? And they don't like that freedom because it doesn't allow them to exert control that they would otherwise like to have. And that's where I see the sort of crossroads that we're at right now. It could be a Bitcoin here. It is one of the most freedom enabling technologies that humanity's ever come into contact with, and that really scares governments that that like control.  </p>
<p>00:22:41:24 - 00:22:54:11<br>Marty<br>And it's convincing them that, hey, you're going to have to be comfortable giving up control because freedom is more important than you controlling everybody's everyday life and what they do with their money.  </p>
<p>00:22:54:13 - 00:23:18:08<br>Lyuda<br>I think we still have hope anyways because I mean, we have concrete results, right? For the last two years of our advocacy for Bitcoin in order to protect it as a payment and fundraising instrument, we succeed to do so in EU and European Union. So we have an upcoming regulation actually recognition that CRYPTOASSETS can be used as a fundraising instrument and actually payment instruments.  </p>
<p>00:23:18:11 - 00:23:47:19<br>Lyuda<br>We hopefully would have also provisions to defend and protect financial data of both financial institutions and cryptoasset services providers. And we also have a provision about abuse of anti-money laundering regulation, a mechanism especially disinformation, to financially exclude people. So specific categories refugees, civil society, organization even mentioned in a regulation. But it's not enough. And unfortunately, G7 countries were not happy about our achievements.  </p>
<p>00:23:47:19 - 00:24:14:29<br>Lyuda<br>And this is the reason why we came to us two weeks ago to speak. We saw 27 representative self-regulatory bodies, both Senate's Financial Action Task Force, a State Department and Congress, because the US acting from one side that they create domestic legislation right now is the process of reform of anti-monopoly regulation and actually shaping crypto regulation in the US.  </p>
<p>00:24:15:05 - 00:24:45:06<br>Lyuda<br>But it's not true. Whenever U.S. decides to ship we in regulatory way domestically, it's affect affects entire world. And when G7 countries, U.S. demand, for example, where they say that's okay, we have to look into peer to peer transactions now self-hosted wallets as a something what is threat to financial integrity. It's affect, of course, other democracies. And we afraid that our achievements here in EU will be questioned.  </p>
<p>00:24:45:06 - 00:25:08:16<br>Lyuda<br>So we need to gain to defense of course, of wallet. We need to defend mixers as a privacy tools and do these above work. And we cannot ignore it because, for example, yesterday in Davos and we have discussion with some bitcoiners and they said you can just simply not comply. I cannot not comply because I get protection from you.  </p>
<p>00:25:08:16 - 00:25:37:07<br>Lyuda<br>And for example, my life would be literally under threat if I would not get protected from the attack since 2008 by three authoritarian regimes. And I'm really grateful for being protected. But from other side, I protect another people, political prisoners and all of us. We need to have both support of democracies and we need to be able to use Bitcoin as a peer to peer transactions, as a decentralized mechanism built on proof of work mechanism.  </p>
<p>00:25:37:09 - 00:26:24:18<br>Lyuda<br>So we need to provide security for developers of privacy instruments and also for miners if we don't succeed to do those things, this means that we lose our the only instrument. And luckily we have seen support from those regulators and legislators who approve human rights. Of course, you always have bad actors in every sphere, but how we succeed to have this changes how we succeed, to have a different national inter-parliamentary platforms, provisions that reflect See yourself Bitcoin and Stablecoins for human rights and humanitarian purposes in the regulations for 57 Member States more nor for America, Europe and Asia, actually, thanks to these people.  </p>
<p>00:26:24:20 - 00:26:50:08<br>Lyuda<br>So there are people and legislators who listen in us. But the problem is we need to remove voices. We need them to educate, make face to face meetings where they cannot direct questions. They will never risk it to us, even online or publicly. But they need to be able to to get this information. It's an effort, but it's a safe effort because you cannot do this activity in authoritarian states.  </p>
<p>00:26:50:10 - 00:27:19:18<br>Lyuda<br>Remind yourself what's happened in Kazakhstan back in January 2022, when most of miners were just cut off of Internet. You know why it happened? It's actually was the days when authorities of Kazakhstan employed Russian troops and domestically troops to shoot peaceful protesters. They not only should freedoms, they should real people. They killed Bitcoin mining in Kazakhstan and they killed their citizens who were protesting for freedoms.  </p>
<p>00:27:19:20 - 00:27:46:03<br>Lyuda<br>So the same we do right now. We have two transactions in Kazakhstan on the fault of fighting against to be transactions and everything around Salesforce. It was everything actually around any kind of financial freedoms in the most sophisticated action regime, able to lift sanctions from Russian banks in this country of in the US. And this is all happening and we ask questions to us regulators.  </p>
<p>00:27:46:03 - 00:27:52:09<br>Lyuda<br>Okay you want to have effective mechanism still was to Russia to circumvent sanctions, then change.  </p>
<p>00:27:52:09 - 00:27:52:23<br>Bota<br>Travel.  </p>
<p>00:27:52:24 - 00:28:34:06<br>Lyuda<br>Rule change assumption that you treat equally financial situations of third countries, authoritarian state and actually democracies. Did you transfer intelligence, financial intelligence, knowledge from democracy to authoritarian states, which is not used against actually criminals and organized groups or terrorists? Kazakhstan recognized Taliban as a legitimate government, but it's used against civil society in opposition. It takes 3 to 5 minutes to block bank account of opposition or civil society members whose fundraising for actually, you know, supportive of families of political prisoners.  </p>
<p>00:28:34:06 - 00:28:59:07<br>Lyuda<br>And because our reality and these arguments, the change perspective of those politicians who meet us and those who support human rights because normally they want to support us, but they don't know how and they don't know what is the role of Bitcoin because you would not read it in the media. Where you do will see that media would write about abuse of anti-money laundering, counter-terrorism regulation.  </p>
<p>00:28:59:09 - 00:29:26:01<br>Lyuda<br>Have you seen, for example, maybe publications, how, for example, activists were deprived or immigrants deprived the right to have financial services immediately In democracies? There is no this kind of information, and this is the reason why it's so important to work for the UN. Both achievements which we have and we have a lot of achievements right now. We just no capacity to go and continue this work and this is the reason why we came to Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:29:26:01 - 00:29:47:11<br>Lyuda<br>I say let us guys do it together because you are the same activist as us because Satoshi Nakamoto was the same freedom activist as us. He created and gave us this tool. But it's nothing for granted. You have to defend it. It's a basic human rights, and human rights are dying if they are not defended. And we saw it's many, many times.  </p>
<p>00:29:47:14 - 00:30:25:27<br>Marty<br>That's a very good point. Rights aren't granted. They're taken to defend it. And as it stands today with Bitcoin, we have to we have Bitcoin. We're using it in a peer to peer fashion. We're mining pretty efficiently and in many areas and we have to defend the right to do these things. And with that in mind, I know there is a pressing timeline here, so let's dive into the particulars of what is in front of the European Parliament as it pertains to proof of work, how long we have to convince lawmakers in the EU not to do this and what will happen if it does or does not pass.  </p>
<p>00:30:25:29 - 00:30:54:10<br>Bota<br>Yeah, we have to work on several fronts, right? This is not just the European Parliament and in the European Parliament we actually going to have elections in the summer of this year. So when the new European Parliament comes and starts working in September, we have to be already fully ready and we have to work by then with all European institutions.  </p>
<p>00:30:54:17 - 00:31:36:12<br>Bota<br>It means that ESMA it means the European Commission means with the European Central Bank. We have to work on those biases. We have to have the meetings. We really have to participate in the process of developing this sustainability indicators that ESMA is doing. We have to demand to meet with them, visit together with a Bitcoin mining community and with the experts on our side and address this issue, address this bias, and really explain to them our position and currently they all exist in research.  </p>
<p>00:31:36:17 - 00:32:09:06<br>Bota<br>You know, right now when, when you say something that that bitcoin mining is actually can be helpful for the adoption of the renewable it's actually facilitated adoption of these renewable this is something that nobody knows about it in the EU and we have to come with miners from all over the world. We really need to bring miners in from Africa and demonstrate how they work there very successfully.  </p>
<p>00:32:09:08 - 00:32:40:14<br>Bota<br>And they not only facility IT adoption of renewables, they actually provide people with work there. They create electricity for the communities that otherwise would have not had electricity. And this issue is extremely important for the European Union. And we also have to work at the level of the member states. Don't forget, the European Union's is a is it 27 countries, Red has 27 countries members, but we don't have to work with all of them.  </p>
<p>00:32:40:14 - 00:33:17:03<br>Bota<br>But there are five key countries that really affect the both the energy policy and the environmental policy. And we have to work with the regulators there and we have to work with the parliaments there. So this is the best time to start. We really should have started two years ago. But, you know, we just hope that everyone understands that the issue is quite pressing and we have to jump into it.  </p>
<p>00:33:17:06 - 00:33:41:23<br>Marty<br>And so what can anybody listening to this do to help you guys? And so as we talk about particularly this show, a lot of people that listen to the show are completely disenchanted from politics, whether it's here in the U.S. or the EU, myself included, to a certain extent, like I have this presupposition that the governments have too much control.  </p>
<p>00:33:41:24 - 00:34:08:09<br>Marty<br>They like that control and they're not going to give it up. But you to have been doing a good job over the last week, you see me that again, these rights need to be defended. And we have seen here in the United States when the government tries to overstepped its bounds and infringe on bitcoiners rights to to use Bitcoin in particular ways that we have submitted comments to FinCEN, the Treasury basically saying, hey, this is way out of line.  </p>
<p>00:34:08:09 - 00:34:31:01<br>Marty<br>They have reacted positively. And I know the answer to this because we discussed it last week. But I think for anybody who didn't hear that conversation, be valuable for them to hear it now, do you have confidence that if action is taken to educate the EU politicians that proof of work could be saved in the EU?  </p>
<p>00:34:31:03 - 00:34:56:27<br>Lyuda<br>Yeah, I think we have all actually chances that we can protect for proof of work and the way how we do it through submissions, through face to face meetings. So what kind of submission, for example, we've done to FinCEN, we collected testimonials of all human rights defenders and basically met with the Treasurer, met with State Department and explain them.  </p>
<p>00:34:56:27 - 00:35:26:09<br>Lyuda<br>Of course you can have some ground to say that this instrument can be used by criminals, but please take into consideration that enormous amount of people financially excluded in most of countries is a very tiny state. We have no other tools and we need to have mutual land which talks to technology and we provide it's all set of recommendations, including actually travel, rule reform and other things, which are what you mentioned during our discussion.  </p>
<p>00:35:26:09 - 00:35:52:02<br>Lyuda<br>What has to be changed. This is the first things. The second thing we want to do the same what we've done, for example, providing our testimonials of Bitcoin and miners and Bitcoin miners for humanity, for human rights defenders and Bitcoin miners to EU institutions. We need do the same in the US. So the also know who are and what is exactly social impact of bitcoin mining.  </p>
<p>00:35:52:02 - 00:36:17:20<br>Lyuda<br>Why it's important because we have no they don't see difference between proof of stake and proof of work. This is something with not enough to be said just in podcast, but it has to be written in the language and dependable for regulators, which we afterwards could refer as a personal testimonial. So witness the statements of those who actually and users of Bitcoin, those who benefit from proof of work.  </p>
<p>00:36:17:22 - 00:36:46:16<br>Lyuda<br>And these testimonials. Everyone who is listening to this podcast from where no matter where you are from, please reach us out and we will help you to shape these testimonials in a framework understandable for regulators. And it will one more step to defend human rights and the proof of work actually in institutions. And it's doable. It's absolutely doable because we heard many times business voices of miners.  </p>
<p>00:36:46:16 - 00:37:10:03<br>Lyuda<br>We ready to hear them. So we have this view. We are very positive on this. Of course, it doesn't matter that there are no better actors. There are better actress because this false narrative exist. Someone created them. Right? But if we don't try to combine them, we will not dismiss them. They will be the only one in this area.  </p>
<p>00:37:10:06 - 00:37:35:03<br>Lyuda<br>And the third thing, we need to have capacity. We need is a non-governmental organization, a nonprofit organization to have support, any kind of support, volunteers, financial support, whatever. We are happy to cooperate and be a platform for voices as we always been for 15 years to EU and U.S. regulators and defend the only tool we have for financial freedom right now.  </p>
<p>00:37:35:05 - 00:38:05:18<br>Bota<br>Yeah, and I just would like to add that we hear it a lot, that there's nothing can be done. We don't trust politicians. You know, politicians are cruel, Politics is dirty. And for us, it's very frustrating to to to hear is that in in the US and in the European Union because we believe this is you have all the instruments you really have to get engage into activism.  </p>
<p>00:38:05:20 - 00:38:43:16<br>Bota<br>And you know, there are certain forms of activism and for some reason, for a lot of people it creates kind of created some kind of negative connotation. But it's something that this is how you can directly affect the policies. If you are quiet, why you you should think that the government should act in your best interest. You have to show that you are a citizen, you are a voter, you have a position, you organize yourself and you bring all this issues to the table of the regulators.  </p>
<p>00:38:43:18 - 00:39:13:12<br>Bota<br>And we really we have activists dying to have that literally dying, right? We just had this horrible tragedy with Navalny in Russia, dying in prison, but being killed in prison. And we have activists, opposition politicians in prisons all over the world just to have and they are all fighting to have the right to kind of influence the policies of their countries.  </p>
<p>00:39:13:14 - 00:39:44:03<br>Bota<br>And you have that right. It's already right given to you by the Constitution and existing laws. And for some reason you prefer to ignore it and just not do much. Please, guys, wake up. We have a chance. We have a really serious fighting chance. And we have to defend this technology, this technology that it's not only technologies that bring in money to you, but this is technologies that saves lives.  </p>
<p>00:39:44:06 - 00:39:52:04<br>Bota<br>And that's why we're willing to fight. We have the skin in the game. So we want you to join our fight.  </p>
<p>00:39:52:06 - 00:40:12:11<br>Marty<br>And what is your hope in the long run that Bitcoin succeeds? Let's say we're successful at defending proof of work, at defending the right to hold your own keys and to transact as privately as possible. What does the world look like in your mind on the other side of successes against encroachments from the state?  </p>
<p>00:40:12:14 - 00:40:37:17<br>Lyuda<br>My success it no one's personal financial data would not be able to use to torture people to kidnap the one day I would not be wake up like I was wake up in 2018 by Botha saying that your brother was taken as a hostage because of weaponization of my. And you've been in data by three regimes. I hope it'll never, ever happen to anyone.  </p>
<p>00:40:37:19 - 00:41:07:23<br>Lyuda<br>And we would be able to manage our financial freedoms. We would have decentralized financial tool. I hope that people will understand that money, responsibility. It's also knowledge that you should eliminate around yourself and financial literacy. And this is something your responsibility, not someone has to do it. If you enjoy financial freedom, if you enjoy any kind of freedom, that means that someone did this job centuries or maybe years ago.  </p>
<p>00:41:07:23 - 00:41:19:19<br>Lyuda<br>And we right now doing the same in our countries and European Union and the US. It's a safe countries for us, and Bitcoin is the only instrument for us and that's why we defend it here.  </p>
<p>00:41:19:21 - 00:41:48:20<br>Bota<br>Well, yeah, and we will be able I for me with this instrument and this is something that Bitcoin will will mainstream, right. Which is very important for us because then it will become an instrument for the civil society. And so as a civil society, we will be able to raise financing to finance position in the countries where the banking system and basically create sort of is I should provide this as well.  </p>
<p>00:41:48:27 - 00:42:13:17<br>Bota<br>They're just instruments of law enforcement, all those countries. Right. And they spy on people rather than being neutral institutions. So we believe that we believe in in Bitcoin, we believe in its power and we believe the civil society around the world should adopt it.  </p>
<p>00:42:13:19 - 00:42:26:22<br>Marty<br>Let's dive into that example of the government using your banking information not to kidnap your brother. But what like just to give an example of how this happened, what happened.  </p>
<p>00:42:26:24 - 00:43:04:13<br>Bota<br>A concrete example is that I live in Belgium. I have political asylum in Kazakhstan because of the work I was doing defending political prisoners and politically persecuted people and victims of torture. They were constantly attacking. Musee tried to extradite me twice from Belgium. It didn't work, so they tried to kidnap me from Belgium and three people were actually sentenced in Belgium, two Germans and one Russian, thanks to the Belgium Federal police.  </p>
<p>00:43:04:15 - 00:43:26:01<br>Bota<br>But it didn't work. So what what the government of Kazakhstan did they send a request is that it's called the Mutual Legal assistance request request for the information. And they got my banking data in banking data. What is like think about what you have on your bank statement. You have all the information and you have all your contacts, basically.  </p>
<p>00:43:26:03 - 00:44:02:07<br>Bota<br>Right. And They really can figure out who is your doctor, where you go, where you stay. If you travel, this is in and they can figure out you, even your family contacts, because because of their transfers. Right. And they looked at my bank account and they realized that that the way how they they realize that I have a weak point and this is my family in Kazakhstan and my brothers and my older brother my parents lived there at that time and my older brother.  </p>
<p>00:44:02:10 - 00:44:42:28<br>Bota<br>And one day they just came, arrested my brother and accuse him and my new wandering, which is was absolutely baseless. And then they they said that we will we're going to release you if you make your sister to go back to Kazakhstan. And my brother refused and he was tortured for two months and all the now it's only because of interference of the Western politicians, the members of the European Parliament, members of the Senate and Congress are in the end of the day, my brother was released and he managed to leave the country.  </p>
<p>00:44:43:01 - 00:44:52:07<br>Bota<br>But basically that's that's how it works. That's how the abuse of anti-money laundering regulation is happening.  </p>
<p>00:44:52:10 - 00:45:13:21<br>Marty<br>And it's insane. I'm sorry, had to go through that, number one. But it's just insane to me. And this is probably why I don't like engaging in politics. It's because everything that the government does, I'm a big free markets, anti-government. I think the government makes everything worse. They print money and throw it at things that don't make sense.  </p>
<p>00:45:13:21 - 00:45:53:29<br>Marty<br>They write these draconian laws as it pertains to KYC, AML, like since 1971. I believe in the Bank Secrecy Act here in the United States, I think is the core of a lot of these problems that exist in the world of data collection for financial transactions stems from that law. Everything since then, it's just gotten worse. And despite the fact that all the KYC, AML Regulation, all the travel rule regulation, the in a hyper digitalized world has only gotten more and more stringent their ability to actually stop crime and money laundering has gotten worse and worse.  </p>
<p>00:45:53:29 - 00:46:26:02<br>Marty<br>I think something like 0.1 percent of global money laundering is prevented by KYC, AML regulations and compliance, actually catching people that are laundering money. It's completely ineffective. And as you just explained, like collecting this and holding it in securely and holding it in a way where despotic, authoritarian governments can request that information at a moment's notice. And you have to deliver it due to the information sharing that comes with complying with the travel rule.  </p>
<p>00:46:26:07 - 00:46:54:19<br>Marty<br>You can you just put a lot of people in harm's way. And there's this obsession with personal identifying information collection that the governments have that is completely counterproductive to the goals that they're claiming they want to achieve, which is reducing financial harm. And they're actually increasing physical harm by trying to reduce the financial crimes, which it's just like, All right, guys, this obviously isn't working.  </p>
<p>00:46:54:23 - 00:47:17:06<br>Marty<br>You have to figure out a better way, become better police and investigators to stop actual crime. You don't throw the baby out with the bathwater and just do a wide swath mass surveillance of everybody and put everybody at risk. Like, that's the point we're getting to. And despite the failure of these policies to actually stop, the crimes are claiming they want to stop.  </p>
<p>00:47:17:06 - 00:47:26:10<br>Marty<br>They keep doubling, tripling, quadrupling down to the point where they want a digital I.D., which is just gonna make things much worse.  </p>
<p>00:47:26:13 - 00:48:01:00<br>Bota<br>It's coming. It's coming as digital IDs, currency BTC is coming. It was actually you will be surprised how it's very much welcome and embraced by authoritarian countries, which gives you a little bit information how it's going to be misused. And again, unless we see something, unless we resist, unless we limit the ability of the government to implement those policies, nothing will change.  </p>
<p>00:48:01:02 - 00:48:26:17<br>Bota<br>Sorry, Martin. No, this is why if it's you can hate the government as much as you want, but this is the existing evil, right? It's necessary. Evil. Yeah. And it's easy to hate it when you you enjoy certain security, right? You enjoy protection of the of the your property rights. But in the world of countries, people don't enjoy that.  </p>
<p>00:48:26:19 - 00:48:37:01<br>Bota<br>They don't have this privilege. So you are lucky and you have all of the privileges. You should use them to defend your rights.  </p>
<p>00:48:37:03 - 00:49:02:03<br>Lyuda<br>Yeah, exactly. You cannot do safely even this kind of discussion in the threatening states. We just all will be killed or will be paid in prison or will be tortured or sentenced for many years. You know, our families will be taken as hostages. The difference between authoritarian states and democracies, no matter how we love them or not to hate them, that we have tools and we can operate safely like relative safety.  </p>
<p>00:49:02:03 - 00:49:29:04<br>Lyuda<br>Of course there is always certain anyways backfire, but anyways, it's a I can conduct advocacy and have this open dialog with regulators and legislators can criticize them saying that guys, your regulation is killing me. Please help me. Please actually introduce my recommendations. And they doing it while for example, in the three Italian states I would not even able to share a post on Facebook or like this kind of information.  </p>
<p>00:49:29:12 - 00:49:52:09<br>Lyuda<br>This is enough to basically eliminate me and this is the reality. So it's about our choice just to complain or just to take this power what you have because because you are citizens of you, because you are citizens of us, Canada and other democracies, and actually say, Hi guys, you represent my interests and I'm not angry with you.  </p>
<p>00:49:52:11 - 00:50:05:28<br>Lyuda<br>Actually, I want to use Bitcoin as a legitimate instrument. You don't understand what is proof of work, what is P2P transactions, what is social good for? Listen to me and they will listen to you. And this is your power.  </p>
<p>00:50:06:00 - 00:50:36:25<br>Marty<br>And going back to what you said earlier about narrative being very powerful, that's one thing I think Bitcoiners have gotten wise on, particularly in the last 5 to 6 years, is you got to tell better stories. It's very important in this information battle that we're in because at the end of the day, this is really what we're engaged in, is an information warfare for the hearts and minds of the individuals who will either step up to defend their rights or let the government and the regulators run over them.  </p>
<p>00:50:36:27 - 00:51:16:22<br>Marty<br>And that's why I think the act of the activism that you two are engaged is extremely powerful because it's somewhat of an ironclad narrative. Like Bitcoin literally saves lives and protects people from authoritarian governments. And I think that's something as an industry, we've gotten better at, but really need to perfect this narrative to the masses, which is an optimistic future, a future of abundance, a future of equality of opportunity, equality of access, equality of being able to attain a monetary good that is not debased will preserve your purchasing power over time.  </p>
<p>00:51:16:22 - 00:51:41:21<br>Marty<br>There's very good optimistic lines that we can run with that that paint a very optimistic future with Bitcoin at the center of it, whether it's the open source network, the scarce money supply or the integration of the mining industry with the energy sector making it more robust so more people can have access to more reliable, cheaper energy. I think they're.  </p>
<p>00:51:41:24 - 00:51:42:22<br>Lyuda<br>Exactly.  </p>
<p>00:51:42:24 - 00:52:12:16<br>Bota<br>Exactly. And just one little thing I would like to add. It's please, please don't paint all the politicians with one black paint. You know, it's not only people that really, truly believe in human rights, that truly believe in financial freedom, that truly believe in economic freedom, that try to limit the like in fighting against, you know, kind of growing interference of the state.  </p>
<p>00:52:12:18 - 00:52:34:18<br>Bota<br>You have to find them and you have to help those people because you kind of you are a power that feeds them. You have to have all the data that we need on our side. We just really have to bring that this data to the right people, and that will be their weapon and they will be fighting for us as well.  </p>
<p>00:52:34:20 - 00:52:46:21<br>Marty<br>Yeah, we can't have Alex of years. The Dutch central bank minion in his terribly written paper for the Dutch economist or whatever it's called.  </p>
<p>00:52:46:23 - 00:52:46:28<br>Bota<br>It's.  </p>
<p>00:52:46:29 - 00:53:21:00<br>Lyuda<br>You know we need to have changes in one of the most I would say like books organization Interpol. So we signification which unites all ministries of interiors of the world. Of course, most of the Ministry of Interior of the world does have to be Italian. But nevertheless, we fight for reform. And actually, again, I would say that abuses of this important police instrument instrument, worse things to actually open doors from the anti-money laundering counter-terrorism regulations.  </p>
<p>00:53:21:00 - 00:53:45:03<br>Lyuda<br>So this is the first stage how all politically motivated accusations happening on this basis. And then the police institution, US banking data is easily given to it or to handful of dictators. So we succeed to do reform of this institution. So we strongly believe that we can do changes altered the everyone was laughing at us saying, oh, you girls, you going to change this?  </p>
<p>00:53:45:03 - 00:54:11:18<br>Lyuda<br>You see in this room only like, you know, privileged to ministries from all of this dictatorship, do we think they will listen to you. But we luckily had voices and support of legislators, democratic countries who, as what I said, really believe in human rights. And we did it. We did it. It's fucked. So right now you have clear procedure how to defend your rights, not be in this black box.  </p>
<p>00:54:11:18 - 00:54:33:19<br>Lyuda<br>And even if you became a victim of abuse of Interpol, you have clear procedures how to remove yourself from there and even to demand compensation. We have to do the same with abuses of anti money immigration. We have to do the same with protecting labeling Bitcoin with any kind of war on these false accusations.  </p>
<p>00:54:33:21 - 00:55:09:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah, maybe these politicians that I'm talking about about that want to do not bad things necessarily, but want more control. Maybe they depend on the complacency of the average Joe of the common man to just sit there like, oh, it's fine to be like, hey, if they're not going to do anything, we're going to take these rights. I think that's a big problem we have here in the West, specifically the United States is the populace here has become a bit complacent, literally felt a bit dumber, complacent, resting on our laurels, that just a lot of people to sit by and get pushed around and they'll complain on social media but really don't do anything.  </p>
<p>00:55:10:03 - 00:55:16:28<br>Marty<br>At the end of the day, that's one of the biggest killers of freedom is apathy. Complacency.  </p>
<p>00:55:17:01 - 00:55:23:19<br>Bota<br>Yes. And as a person who was once on the Interpol most wanted list.  </p>
<p>00:55:23:22 - 00:55:27:29<br>Marty<br>That he take pride in that that's pretty bad ass.  </p>
<p>00:55:28:01 - 00:55:52:18<br>Bota<br>I confirm everything with you that just said and but it happens to many of us because this is you know, people don't realize how is it Interpol works? Is the bulletin board right. And any authoritarian regime with dictatorship can just put your name and voila, you're wanted by everyone. It was the kind of institutions that was easily, easily abused.  </p>
<p>00:55:52:21 - 00:55:58:06<br>Bota<br>But we changed the narrative. And so we can do the same with Bitcoin even more.  </p>
<p>00:55:58:10 - 00:56:26:07<br>Lyuda<br>You complain about democracies, right? So I've had this case, one or three countries which actually abuse my rights and again, abuse anti-money laundering, counter-terrorism regulation. It was Poland and, you know, Poland is a member of European Union. Right. It gets really strongly to the side of authoritarian regimes is seen the contrary right now. But in like six years they were classified to me as a threat to national security.  </p>
<p>00:56:26:10 - 00:57:01:06<br>Lyuda<br>I'm not joking. Like special services of Poland classified me as a threat to national security with no ground, and I was banned to enter EU for two weeks until the moment when parliaments of Germany, Belgium, France and many other institutions President Macron, president of Germany, stand on and my rights. Also former Prime minister of Belgium. And they granted me well, I'm a threat to national security in Poland, national interest in their countries, and we succeed to change not do we succeed to actually is false.  </p>
<p>00:57:01:06 - 00:57:29:07<br>Lyuda<br>How authoritarian regimes or democracies which started to abuse their power, able to manipulate, you know, the threat national security accusations towards two critical or critical critics, critical people like me. And we change it. So now everyone who is treated in the same way, like me, they have a number of protection tools, they have remedies, and they can easily defend their rights.  </p>
<p>00:57:29:10 - 00:57:56:00<br>Lyuda<br>And I not only defend defended rights of myself, I actually, together with my team, established a mechanism which was adopted and supported by many human rights legislators and regulators in the EU. So it's again, one more example, but everything is doable and we have a lot of tools in our heads, but we need not just to complain in social media, we need to come to meet with them and say, This is my proposals, this is my argumentation.  </p>
<p>00:57:56:03 - 00:58:06:27<br>Lyuda<br>And if you are, stick with argumentation, you go to defend your position. We prove it so many times and we happy to do it to actually defend Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:58:06:29 - 00:58:50:23<br>Bota<br>Unfortunately, we cannot do all of those things without help. We need we need the community behind us and we really need people to get engaged because to do this type of changes, you need a lot a lot of participations from basically not only from activists. That part, you know, we know how to speak with activist and activists, ready to fight, but we need help from Bitcoin miners, from industry experts that will come and meet with the regulators, meet with the politicians and be willing to provide their testimonies.  </p>
<p>00:58:50:23 - 00:58:53:18<br>Bota<br>And then we can do a lot of things.  </p>
<p>00:58:53:20 - 00:59:04:00<br>Marty<br>Yeah, you guys are pretty badass. Interpol's most wanted is fighting back against all these governments, and.  </p>
<p>00:59:04:01 - 00:59:11:02<br>Bota<br>That's why I was removed from the database when Interpol realized that was politically motivated.  </p>
<p>00:59:11:05 - 00:59:18:11<br>Lyuda<br>And I'm also not a threat to national security anymore. I'm not classified anymore. And they let us apologize.  </p>
<p>00:59:18:13 - 00:59:39:09<br>Marty<br>Because I have a lot of stories to tell. This is going to be it's going to be fun decades from now. When we look back, Bitcoin is succeeded. We've we've rolled out a lot of the evil in the world and it was hey, yeah, I was I was on the Interpol most wanted list. I can't say that here in America, they have not come anywhere close to that list.  </p>
<p>00:59:39:12 - 01:00:02:00<br>Marty<br>It's pretty badass, you guys. I mean, it's pretty heavy. Everything you're working on, putting yourself in the crosshairs of a lot of very powerful governments around the world. How what keeps you going? How does the stress how do you not succumb to the stress of all the things you do?  </p>
<p>01:00:02:02 - 01:00:31:25<br>Bota<br>Sometimes it can be extremely, extremely difficult. Especially, you know, it's it's not the difficult part is not dealing with the democratic regulators or members of the parliament. Difficult part for me, the most difficult part when we work on the cases of torture, that probably the most difficult, emotionally draining and we have a lot of unfortunately, we have a lot of experience of working in those cases.  </p>
<p>01:00:31:27 - 01:00:57:22<br>Bota<br>And, you know, sometimes we need even professional help like ceremonies because it it's it's very hard. You you know, it takes time for a person to start talking for a victim of torture. And you have to go with him through it step by step, step by step to kind of to get all this information on paper. It's it's extremely painful.  </p>
<p>01:00:57:22 - 01:01:37:04<br>Bota<br>And then that haunts you for a long time. But I think we we do it because we really you kind of you feel this internal gratification. You understand why it's important to you see how you change your life. You see how you change your life not only of that person, but that person's family members. We have a job as a support that that is very important from, you know, our community activities.  </p>
<p>01:01:37:07 - 01:01:57:15<br>Bota<br>You know, we never work on any issue, so we always have a group of people coalition. So we work on this Bitcoin advocacy issue as a coalition, but on other subjects we work as different coalitions as well. So that helps kind of a network.  </p>
<p>01:01:57:18 - 01:02:28:00<br>Lyuda<br>Yeah, exactly. In my case, I used to have experience as a teenager how it's so important that there are people defending ready to come in to defend your family member who is taken as a hostage because of not agreeing to, for example, corrupt deals or for criticizing the government. And we see this light in the tunnel. And someone said, yeah, no worries, you can actually meet your brother in the hospital he's back from being taken hostage.  </p>
<p>01:02:28:00 - 01:02:55:22<br>Lyuda<br>And I think the most difficult for all of this case is when our relative suffers. And I wanted to be seen that time, this kind of hope just to other people who needed help and actually to provide this help. So I think this is something no matter what's happened with me, I tried to actually to overcome it. It's easier when it's something happened with me, actually, because I also this myself from my case.  </p>
<p>01:02:55:24 - 01:03:22:12<br>Lyuda<br>It's not easy. It's just like easier when your relatives are taken as a hostage. I think what I will agree with me that you can actually, as a person responsible for your activity, overcome difficulties, you know, what kind of mechanism you have, but you feel completely powerless sometimes when your family members, your close people are taken as a hostage and you need to release you need to do all efforts because I think the most difficult.  </p>
<p>01:03:22:14 - 01:03:55:11<br>Marty<br>Yeah, yeah. Again I can't imagine that. I mean, being an American, not having to really put myself out there to that extent. I mean, yes, I have a podcast and a newsletter and website where we do talk bad about the government, their policies and all that. And I luckily, despite whether or not I believe America is as free as it maybe should be, I do have the ability to do this without having to worry about any of that.  </p>
<p>01:03:55:11 - 01:04:15:23<br>Marty<br>So it is something that I and certainly many other Americans definitely take for granted. And it's really grounding to speak with you to learn more about your experiences, because it is insane that people have to go through this on a daily basis all throughout the world.  </p>
<p>01:04:15:25 - 01:04:39:28<br>Lyuda<br>Yes. And most of the countries are authoritarian. So what are you doing? Actually, I would not say that. It's absolutely you know, it's important work because you you criticize, you see, you have a right to criticize and you exercising your rights. Now, do one step more, actually try to extract from those who represent your interests, even if you don't like them, that they follow actually your recommendations and you can do it.  </p>
<p>01:04:40:02 - 01:04:57:25<br>Lyuda<br>You have all instruments in your hands and we are happy to actually assist and be this platform, say who is actually pro human rights because we work for them, for them for over 15 years and we happy to do it both in us and you. And I'm sure that we can do beautiful things together.  </p>
<p>01:04:57:27 - 01:04:59:13<br>Marty<br>I agree we're going to win.  </p>
<p>01:04:59:15 - 01:05:01:28<br>Lyuda<br>But we have to. We don't have other chance.  </p>
<p>01:05:02:00 - 01:05:17:11<br>Marty<br>We have to work. And with that mind, is there anything we didn't touch on that we should touch on Before we wrap up? Any information you think is pertinent, then anybody listening to this has access to any calls to action.  </p>
<p>01:05:17:14 - 01:05:38:03<br>Lyuda<br>I mean, call to action. Support us. And remember, guys, everyone who is developing more and more access to both freedom to financial freedom tools for such people, like we love you, really, we love you and we want you to actually support it as much as possible. Bring your technologies. We need to litigate as much as possible people. We want to define proof of work.  </p>
<p>01:05:38:06 - 01:05:44:01<br>Lyuda<br>We know how to do it. Let us do it together. Give us your testimonials, give us your support, and let's do it together.  </p>
<p>01:05:44:04 - 01:06:00:03<br>Bota<br>And when you see that Bitcoin is an instrument of freedom, remember us. It is an instrument of freedom. And really we need you your help to defend this instrument. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:06:00:05 - 01:06:34:04<br>Marty<br>Let's do it for we're going to link to both your profile is in the show notes, link to your website and get active freaks, whether it's in the EU, the global audience, and EU freaks listening to this, right? Yes. Let's get active. Yes. And here in the United States, send your submissions and pushback. Yeah. I think that FinCEN the FinCEN comments that went through last month are yet to be determined whether or not they convinced the government to to back off of what the Treasury would like to do.  </p>
<p>01:06:34:04 - 01:06:45:22<br>Marty<br>But we shall see. I think it was very powerful. Let's keep doing it, engage where it makes sense and just bring. That's the thing. We have the data on our side. We have the truth on our side.  </p>
<p>01:06:45:24 - 01:06:48:13<br>Bota<br>Yeah, Yeah. We need to bring that data.  </p>
<p>01:06:48:15 - 01:06:49:11<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>01:06:49:14 - 01:07:08:09<br>Lyuda<br>So and one last thing. If you are in my day and if you are BTC Prague conference, reach us out. We are happy to meet you guys in life and I think more people from us has to come to you because otherwise we have limited capacity to come to us. So we would love to meet you in person and get the testimonies.  </p>
<p>01:07:08:09 - 01:07:21:02<br>Lyuda<br>We will do meetings. Last time we did it in Prague. Also meetings in the Parliament. We will try to organize things also this time. So we would love to reach out.  </p>
<p>01:07:21:04 - 01:07:25:03<br>Marty<br>Let's go. All right, Berta, Ludo, thank you for your time.  </p>
<p>01:07:25:03 - 01:07:27:28<br>Lyuda<br>Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.  </p>
<p>01:07:27:28 - 01:07:31:01<br>Marty<br>Keep crushing at peace and love for speaking.</p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:image href="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/482-Lyuda-Bota.png"/>
      </item>
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Bitcoin’s Positive Influence On Power Markets | James McAvity]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[Jamie's insights provide a compelling argument for the convergence of Bitcoin mining and energy production, suggesting a future where these two critical industries support and enhance each other, leading to more efficient markets and a move towards a more decentralized and resilient energy grid.]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Jamie's insights provide a compelling argument for the convergence of Bitcoin mining and energy production, suggesting a future where these two critical industries support and enhance each other, leading to more efficient markets and a move towards a more decentralized and resilient energy grid.]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:15:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iobitcoin-power-markets-james-mcavity/</link>
      <comments>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iobitcoin-power-markets-james-mcavity/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qq6xsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7cnfw33k76tw94cx7am9wgkk6ctjddjhgueddfsk6etn94kkxctkd968jtczyq5zg6hwmdnu57e9q89ktqxuqt939vpv4t8draefhdset5rzkyy26qcyqqq823c5g5a0a</guid>
      <category>TFTC Podcast</category>
      
        <media:content url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/481-James-McAvity.png" medium="image"/>
        <enclosure 
          url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/481-James-McAvity.png" length="0" 
          type="image/png" 
        />
      <noteId>naddr1qq6xsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7cnfw33k76tw94cx7am9wgkk6ctjddjhgueddfsk6etn94kkxctkd968jtczyq5zg6hwmdnu57e9q89ktqxuqt939vpv4t8draefhdset5rzkyy26qcyqqq823c5g5a0a</noteId>
      <npub>npub19qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksn4zc3g</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrib]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/bitcoin-power-markets-james-mcavity/">Read original post</a></p>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<p>This TFTC episode dives deep into the intersection of Bitcoin, energy markets, and the financial mechanisms that tie them together. Marty and his guest Jamie McAvity, Founder and CEO of Cornmint, explore the rapid growth and evolution of Bitcoin mining, the technical and economic hurdles for older individuals engaging with Bitcoin, and the importance of self-custody. They also touch upon the impact of Chinese miners on the American grid and mining industry, highlighting the technical, legal, and operational aspects involved.</p>
<p>The discussion shifts to the dynamics of the Texas electricity market, illustrating the complexities of power purchase agreements, demand response programs, and the role of Bitcoin miners as price-responsive, base-load consumers. Jamie provides an in-depth analysis of the energy market distortions caused by subsidies for renewable energy, drawing parallels with the situation in Germany and emphasizing the potential benefits of nuclear power. The conversation also speculates on the future interplay between Bitcoin's price, mining difficulty, and the block reward halving's effect on the industry.</p>
<p>Lastly, Jamie introduces the concept of Bitcoin-denominated finance for power generation, suggesting that aligning the economic incentives of energy producers and Bitcoin miners could lead to more efficient and resilient energy markets. This idea presents a vision for a future where Bitcoin not only acts as a bridge between the energy sector and finance but also drives a more sophisticated and responsive energy grid.</p>
<h3>Links</h3>
<p>Follow Jamie on <a href="https://twitter.com/jamesmcavity?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<h3>Sponsors</h3>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://app.zaprite.com/?utm_source=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/zaprite-tftc-40off-600x150@2x.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/Find-Talent-2400x1350.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h3>Best Quotes</h3>
<ol>
<li>"Bitcoiners underestimate is the technical hurdle of not so much learning bitcoin and setting up a bitcoin wallet. But the fear that an older person thinks with regard to anything about a computer." - Discussing the challenges older generations face when adopting Bitcoin.</li>
<li>"It's like that meme where the dude drags all his files to the trash can and his computer just evaporates in front of him." - Jamie humorously illustrates the fear older individuals have with technology.</li>
<li>"We might hit 50k during this episode... We are over a trillion-dollar market cap, officially, which is exciting." - The excitement over Bitcoin's surging price and market cap during the recording.</li>
<li>"I think that one thing that bitcoiners underestimate is the passive allocation machine of American public markets." - Jamie on how the financial industry is driving Bitcoin adoption.</li>
<li>"The single largest non-state buyer of electricity in the entire world is a software algorithm – the Bitcoin network." - Jamie explaining the significance of Bitcoin in the global energy market.</li>
<li>"Bitcoin denominated finance for power generation becomes a thing? I don't think it's that crazy." - Jamie's optimistic prediction for the future of energy financing through Bitcoin.</li>
</ol>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>This TFTC rip offers a rich and nuanced discussion on Bitcoin's growing role in the energy sector and the broader financial landscape. It paints a picture of an industry at the cusp of transformative change, driven by technological innovation, market dynamics, and the pioneering spirit of Bitcoiners. Jamie's insights provide a compelling argument for the convergence of Bitcoin mining and energy production, suggesting a future where these two critical industries support and enhance each other, leading to more efficient markets and a move towards a more decentralized and resilient energy grid. The episode leaves listeners with a sense of cautious optimism about Bitcoin's potential to reshape not just finance, but also our approach to energy consumption and production.</p>
<h3>Timestamps</h3>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>7:38 - 50k and Ready Player One<br>13:16 - Assertions of Chinese grid attack<br>23:06 - Working with the wind tax credit issue<br>36:44 - Renewable grid drawbacks and risks<br>44:17 - The right mix of energy sources<br>47:53 - Germany decommissioning and energy politics<br>1:00:23 - Bitcoiners running nuclear<br>1:06:11 - Halving<br>1:11:52 - ASIC innovation<br>1:31:04 - Mining fees<br>1:34:28 - BitMEX<br>1:38:07 - Gamestop<br>1:40:41 - Cormint<br>1:47:01 - Energy/finance integration<br>1:52:25 - Wrapping up</p>
<p>00:00:01:12 - 00:00:03:17<br>Marty<br>Like, check. One, two, one, two. Jamie we're live.  </p>
<p>00:00:03:17 - 00:00:04:16<br>Jamie<br>Microphone check.  </p>
<p>00:00:06:05 - 00:00:08:04<br>Marty<br>Jamie conversing with our Jamie Logan.  </p>
<p>00:00:09:09 - 00:00:13:19<br>Jamie<br>Great. Great to be here. Thank you for having me.  </p>
<p>00:00:13:21 - 00:00:14:24<br>Marty<br>It's a long time coming.  </p>
<p>00:00:15:18 - 00:00:23:19<br>Jamie<br>It is a long time. I've been wondering and I've been wondering when am I going to get on the show? But we had a good riff on the Peter McCormack Show.  </p>
<p>00:00:23:24 - 00:00:29:21<br>Marty<br>That was a great conversation. I was with Thomas over the weekend. Yeah, we were reminiscing on that conversation was great. Free flowing.  </p>
<p>00:00:30:11 - 00:00:31:22<br>Jamie<br>God bless Pupkin.  </p>
<p>00:00:32:13 - 00:00:39:12<br>Marty<br>God bless public. God bless America. God bless bitcoin. You might had 50 k during this episode, during this recording.  </p>
<p>00:00:39:25 - 00:00:47:09<br>Jamie<br>Yeah. Well, we've we are over $1,000,000,000,000 market cap officially which is exciting.  </p>
<p>00:00:47:22 - 00:00:48:11<br>Marty<br>One t.  </p>
<p>00:00:48:29 - 00:00:54:07<br>Jamie<br>One t deleting zero as they say or adding adding adding a zero adding zero.  </p>
<p>00:00:54:11 - 00:00:54:26<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:00:55:09 - 00:00:55:20<br>Jamie<br>Right.  </p>
<p>00:00:55:29 - 00:00:58:00<br>Marty<br>It's pretty crazy. It's happening rather quickly.  </p>
<p>00:00:58:15 - 00:01:09:18<br>Jamie<br>It is. Yeah. The I think maybe we we all may have underestimated the the passive allocation machine of American public markets.  </p>
<p>00:01:10:21 - 00:01:11:29<br>Marty<br>Did you underestimate it yourself?  </p>
<p>00:01:13:03 - 00:01:57:15<br>Jamie<br>I did not. I did not. I, I deal with I have a lot of older friends, and I think that one thing that Bitcoiners underestimate is the technical hurdle of not so much learning Bitcoin and and setting up a bitcoin wallet. But the fear of that an older person thinks with regard to anything about a computer. I mean, how many how many kids, you know, friends that have to help their parents with their email every time they come home, you know, or get asked to solve a remedial or computer issue.  </p>
<p>00:01:57:15 - 00:02:11:11<br>Jamie<br>And the one characteristic of it is the on the uncertainty that they have around what happens if I click this button? There's like this fear that if I click this button, my whole emails, I get this.  </p>
<p>00:02:11:15 - 00:02:17:05<br>Marty<br>It's like that meme where the dude drags off his files to the trashcan and his computer just evaporates in front of him.  </p>
<p>00:02:18:22 - 00:02:22:15<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, Yeah, exactly. That's a real technical hurdle.  </p>
<p>00:02:22:15 - 00:02:37:04<br>Marty<br>And how many how many of these elder of our elders do you know that when you go to help them with their email, they have their password on a Post-it note Right on there. Right. Right on their screen? Yes. Think of Bitcoin. It's like, Oh, yeah, here's my private key. It's right.  </p>
<p>00:02:37:04 - 00:02:42:16<br>Jamie<br>Here. Like the villain Nolan Sorento in Ready Player one.  </p>
<p>00:02:42:24 - 00:02:45:01<br>Marty<br>I watched that Thursday night.  </p>
<p>00:02:45:10 - 00:02:52:15<br>Jamie<br>And his password is Boss Man 69, and it's written on a Post-it note right next to the.  </p>
<p>00:02:53:00 - 00:02:56:27<br>Marty<br>I didn't get through the whole the whole movie, but I watched, like, the first half before falling asleep.  </p>
<p>00:02:57:10 - 00:03:02:24<br>Jamie<br>Oh, yeah. You probably missed the the part I'm referencing where they, they hack his.  </p>
<p>00:03:02:25 - 00:03:04:24<br>Marty<br>I seen it before I was rewatching it. Okay.  </p>
<p>00:03:05:08 - 00:03:06:24<br>Jamie<br>I've seen it like 25 times. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:03:07:10 - 00:03:11:05<br>Marty<br>It's very Bitcoin esque. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:03:11:21 - 00:03:40:25<br>Jamie<br>Prescient. There's a, a scene when they're doing an opening montage describing the success of this VR platform and there's a there's a currency, a digitally native currency within the world. And that I forget what the news clip says, but it's some kind of milestone that the the market capitalization of the in-game currency has exceeded a, you know, create crazy value.  </p>
<p>00:03:41:04 - 00:03:41:10<br>Jamie<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:03:41:20 - 00:03:50:16<br>Marty<br>Yeah yeah. The the winnings for that a tournament and ready player one if you get all the keys. Trillion dollars in stock.  </p>
<p>00:03:50:19 - 00:03:52:09<br>Jamie<br>Yeah half a half trillion.  </p>
<p>00:03:52:20 - 00:03:53:11<br>Marty<br>Half a trillion.  </p>
<p>00:03:53:12 - 00:04:06:18<br>Jamie<br>Yeah. Because he says I've seen it a lot. He says a half a million and a half a trillion dollars. Yeah. Which it's 20, 35. That's way low.  </p>
<p>00:04:07:28 - 00:04:09:14<br>Marty<br>Considering all the inflation that we're going to.  </p>
<p>00:04:10:00 - 00:04:26:22<br>Jamie<br>Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it's going to be like $50 trillion if it were realistic. Yeah, but the movie is based on a book that I think is 15 years old before MTG growth really, really started accelerating and compounding.  </p>
<p>00:04:26:25 - 00:04:34:18<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Do you think that's why the price is popping right now? Because people are looking out at the world and they go, they're going to the shit ton more money, or is it simply flows?  </p>
<p>00:04:35:22 - 00:04:58:11<br>Jamie<br>I think it's flows. I think that China I've been hearing a lot about the China situation. Uh, you know, the Chinese stock market is cratering. They're so indebted and their economy is stalling. Uh, and so the, the China print is coming. It's big. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:04:58:24 - 00:05:07:17<br>Marty<br>And people are successfully escaping yuan and Chinese stock markets in the Bitcoin despite the fact that China does not like Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:05:07:26 - 00:05:34:28<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, there's, uh, probably a lot of that is flowing through the Texas electricity market through hosting contracts. I think that is a loophole that works is if you buy an asset in China, send it anywhere else and run it and then pay a services contract in renminbi, you know, you're effectively circumventing the capital control.  </p>
<p>00:05:35:11 - 00:05:35:22<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:05:36:06 - 00:05:38:10<br>Jamie<br>And acquiring Bitcoin and acquiring Bitcoin. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:05:38:12 - 00:06:02:17<br>Marty<br>On the back end, let's talk about this because it's a big, big theme in the space right now. I think everybody in the mining industry knows there's a bunch of Chinese that are either hosting with American companies or mining themselves. The media is beginning to portray this as a systemic risk to the American economy potentially, but more specifically the American grid system.  </p>
<p>00:06:02:17 - 00:06:04:06<br>Marty<br>Ah, the Chinese attacking our grids.  </p>
<p>00:06:04:27 - 00:06:37:27<br>Jamie<br>That media, you know, they are just they have such a wonderful imagination, aren't they? Yeah, it's there's no there's no grid attack. I mean, we know some of these firms personally. We know their leadership, their leadership is American. They're extremely sensitive to political risk. They're just they're terrified. These are people who were were or are citizens of China under that quasi authoritarian regime.  </p>
<p>00:06:38:14 - 00:07:17:05<br>Jamie<br>They're very inherently scared and skeptical of government. And so they are doing everything they can to be compliant. The one thing I would say that is the most interesting and probably the least enduring component of this phenomenon with with Chinese owned A-6 being operated at American operated facilities, just for starters, the high voltage infrastructure that's connected to the power grid is owned and operated by an American firm.  </p>
<p>00:07:17:26 - 00:07:45:22<br>Jamie<br>And then you are prohibited under Texas law to own and operate high voltage infrastructure in a Chinese controlled entity. So that's it's called the Lonestar Infrastructure Act. So that on its face is illegal for anything like that. So there's no Chinese nationals who have the ability to destroy the power grid. They also would would not want to because that's their Bitcoin printing capital control circumventing machine.  </p>
<p>00:07:47:25 - 00:08:24:17<br>Jamie<br>The one thing that's strange about their behavior is they do not perform economic curtailment as a profit. Maximizing miner like like other equipment. Clients are bitcoin mining company. We are a profit maximizing entity. We are never attempting to consume electricity that exceeds the dollar per megawatt hour equivalent of our bitcoin mine for any period. And so last year, just by the numbers, we're running 30 ish joules per hour hash fleet.  </p>
<p>00:08:26:12 - 00:08:56:17<br>Jamie<br>That meant that in the west zone of ERCOT, we were online 90% of the year and we were offline 10% of the year. And it's not exactly perfect because we are avoided some of the coincident, the four coincident peaks to reduce transmission costs. So it wasn't always economically perfect, but it's a rough estimate of how many hours of the year, 90% of the hours of the year you could profitably convert electricity in the Texas wholesale market into Bitcoin 10% of the hours of the year.  </p>
<p>00:08:56:17 - 00:09:26:14<br>Jamie<br>You couldn't. The peer group of other miners within Texas is not economic actually perfect. They are willing to overpay for power just to convert that into Bitcoin, which is really kind of a unique market dynamic. It is. It is not an economically rational market because the desire to circumvent capital controls and save in Bitcoin creates a premium, a slight premium on power.  </p>
<p>00:09:27:18 - 00:09:34:29<br>Jamie<br>I do think it's going to go away because it doesn't make any sense. But yeah, that's one kind of interesting phenomenon.  </p>
<p>00:09:35:12 - 00:09:51:18<br>Marty<br>So why would does it have to do with the capital controls? The reason for them doing this? Because they're afraid that if they were to sell that electricity for dollars and then have to convert it to Bitcoin and run into some problems trying to convert that.  </p>
<p>00:09:51:18 - 00:10:27:23<br>Jamie<br>I think it comes from a bunch of potential factors. You know, the default hosting agreement template is a 95% uptime agreement. And so, um, there's some economic imperfection in that. That means that the the miner who is hosted is, is paying more for electricity than they should and and the host is leaving money on the table. You know what in our view looks like a perfect hosting agreement is one that is constantly optimizing between the two and sharing the revenue between the host and the miner.  </p>
<p>00:10:27:23 - 00:11:00:16<br>Jamie<br>You know, there's not much the Chinese guys who are sort of watching loads in the West, real time settlement in ERCOT, but their host is. And if the contract restructured in such a way that the host would optimize between the two and always just settle the difference in Bitcoin, then that would be the economically perfect outcome, but that the industry has not progressed to having a creative profit maximizing hosting agreement and it does add some complexity.  </p>
<p>00:11:00:16 - 00:11:19:05<br>Jamie<br>It adds some trust. There's some fidelity on doing settlement reconciliation for an ERCOT bill, which is is an additional incremental overhead for the accounting departments. So I, I'm confident it's going to change, but the current state of it is not optimized.  </p>
<p>00:11:20:01 - 00:11:56:29<br>Marty<br>But it's become more optimized. Over the last five years, it seems like there's been this progression of miners making mistakes around the power purchase agreements, learning from those mistakes, getting better. PPA is now with ERCOT and miners becoming more immersed within the man response programs we've had a bit of trial and error over the last three years specifically with that and people are getting smarter and it seems like slowly but surely over time the industry is going through this iterative process of figuring out what is the ideal situation from locking down the power to setting up the hosting agreement to then doing that profit share on top of that.  </p>
<p>00:11:57:07 - 00:12:09:29<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, definitely. And there's been attrition of less efficient operators and we had a major Texas operator compute North.  </p>
<p>00:12:11:29 - 00:12:12:27<br>Marty<br>Just talking about them.  </p>
<p>00:12:13:13 - 00:12:58:19<br>Jamie<br>Lose their business to their lender and it was being operated by U.S. BTC for a while, who bought it, who partnered with the lender I think to attempt to recover some of the assets. And now that portfolio has transitioned to marathon. So Marathon acquired the compute North built assets. Celsius is another one Celsius. Actually, I am good friends with the guy who was running the Celsius fleet and they were actually good from an energy management perspective, but they had a critical flaw in their capital market structure, obviously.  </p>
<p>00:12:58:29 - 00:13:01:20<br>Marty<br>And the business model, the other part of their business wasn't.  </p>
<p>00:13:02:14 - 00:13:42:09<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, I mean, that's what I mean. You know, they were running an ongoing fraud and had an asset and liability duration mismatch. So they, um, yeah, not necessarily an inefficient operator from the mining perspective, but a fraud. Yeah. So it's, it's getting better. It's getting better. And I just I tweeted yesterday, you know, that the addition of a base load consumer to that is never contributing to peak demand periods on the grid is literally the ideal consumer that you can add for the health of a power market.  </p>
<p>00:13:42:09 - 00:14:32:00<br>Jamie<br>In a power grid, there's no better consumer. It's the inverse of a retail consumer, which around the steady state most of the year, the ERCOT power grid demands between 40 and 50,000 megawatts of power. And last summer, record hot summer peak demand was 83,000 megawatts plus or minus a little bit. So you're talking about a2x response from the generation fleet on the grid to be able to serve those customers and the more bitcoin mining base load that is building coming online here, the stronger a signal it sends to the generation community to invest here and commit to power generation resources.  </p>
<p>00:14:32:16 - 00:14:54:27<br>Jamie<br>And then that Bitcoin mine load is completely gone during the peak. So you get this great signal to the generator community, Hey, come and build a power plant here. Uh, build your solar farms, build your wind farms, builds your natural gas plants, and then that demand is there 90% of the year. If it's economically perfect and it's gone, the 10% of the year when the residential community needs it.  </p>
<p>00:14:55:14 - 00:15:16:13<br>Marty<br>Do you see a scenario where we build generation capacity to, let's say, like 100 gigawatts, like far beyond whatever peak demand would be in the middle of summer or middle winter, If we get bad winter storms here and Bitcoin miners just soak up the excess capacity in perpetuity. That is maybe my naive brain. That's like what I think should happen.  </p>
<p>00:15:16:15 - 00:15:35:06<br>Jamie<br>No, I think you're thinking about it from like a very first principles. It may be a naive analysis, but it's first principles and it's correct. It is absolutely correct that especially with the market distorting price signal of the renewable energy production tax credit.  </p>
<p>00:15:35:06 - 00:15:36:22<br>Marty<br>I wrote about this over the weekend, you.  </p>
<p>00:15:36:22 - 00:16:09:00<br>Jamie<br>Know, it's just like you can underwrite. So a wind farm. Here's an example. A wind farm has a capacity factor of about 30 to 35% of its nameplate output per year. What that means is you build a one megawatt wind turbine, you will get 35% of the year of wind. That is sufficient to create generation for that. So there's 8760 hours in a year.  </p>
<p>00:16:09:10 - 00:16:36:19<br>Jamie<br>You get about a third of that. So call it a little less than 3000 megawatts per year. 3000 megawatt hours per year of generation will come from that wind farm. That one megawatt wind turbine costs $1 million to build a rough, rough estimate. The production tax credit will give you around $30 a megawatt hour for every megawatt hour that you generate.  </p>
<p>00:16:36:29 - 00:17:02:20<br>Jamie<br>So that's 3000 megawatt. And the production tax credit last ten years when you build. So it's 3000 megawatt hours per year times ten years, 30,000 megawatt hours times $30 a megawatt hour In production tax credit, it's $1,000,000. Exactly. So you could literally make $0 from selling energy and you will pay for.  </p>
<p>00:17:02:28 - 00:17:03:07<br>Marty<br>About.  </p>
<p>00:17:03:07 - 00:17:36:28<br>Jamie<br>Even the wind turbine. Yeah. And that is what is happening. This is why we have 10% of the year. There's negative negatively priced power in ERCOT and even though wind farms are not generating any revenue from selling energy, they're still building them because the federal government is effectively subsidizing this power. I mean, Corman's Bitcoin mine is a decommissioned wind farm that decommissioned in its 12th year of operation because once the production tax credits ended, they were never making money.  </p>
<p>00:17:36:28 - 00:17:40:24<br>Jamie<br>So they had no no use for they were losing money.  </p>
<p>00:17:41:10 - 00:17:56:10<br>Marty<br>And I want to dive deeper into this topic before we do that. Like why was Corman positioned to come take this asset and make a profitable? What do you do that makes us now profitable?  </p>
<p>00:17:56:18 - 00:18:26:04<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, well I mean it's we're effectively the inverse of the market distorted price signal from renewable energy. We are there to consume power when there is no demand from the grid and then we are shutting off. All right. Our behavior is as close to economic perfect, economically perfect as possible. And that's the business is attempting to be as economically perfect in consumption of power as we can be.  </p>
<p>00:18:26:11 - 00:18:59:28<br>Jamie<br>And the big barrier to entry for a mining startup, if at least if you want to play on grid and and wholesale, I mean, you know you know, off grid better than anybody. So you know, the constraints there are generator finance and all of that stuff for on grid it's a substation and interconnection and the interconnection queue in Texas is 2 to 4 years depending on where you're trying to go online and long lead time items on a high voltage grid.  </p>
<p>00:18:59:28 - 00:19:38:06<br>Jamie<br>Interconnected substation are one year at best, four years at worse. And you're talking about making somewhere between five and $20 million of CapEx before you even mine a Bitcoin. So you're waiting 1 to 4 years and making 5 to $20 million of CapEx to be able to mine Bitcoin. It's extremely if you're a startup company that's and most investors who invest in a Bitcoin mining startup, they would like to participate in the price appreciation of Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:19:38:06 - 00:20:11:25<br>Jamie<br>And if you do not deliver that, they get they're not pleased with you as a fiduciary of their capital. So you've got to convince someone to give you enough equity at a valuation that still makes sense for you or to give you an infrastructure loan to go and build a substation to make that happen. We were in in that phase of our business, we began our operations in upstate New York and we concluded not a great place to be and to do anything related to Bitcoin, much less be a Bitcoin miner.  </p>
<p>00:20:12:20 - 00:20:50:19<br>Jamie<br>And we did a nationwide search of the best place to do it. We identified West Texas, and then we found a wind farm owner who was very motivated to sell their assets because they were actively losing money on it. And we proved that we could develop the infrastructure to do this. And we had a team who who was going to figure out ways to innovate in this industry, and we convince them to sell us their substation and transmission line from their wind farm as an equity round in our business.  </p>
<p>00:20:50:29 - 00:21:02:07<br>Jamie<br>So we actually took a substation and a transmission line in-kind as an equity contribution to the company, and that was a game changer. I mean, that was that the reason why we exist today?  </p>
<p>00:21:02:19 - 00:21:05:11<br>Marty<br>And that's a very creative way of doing a deal.  </p>
<p>00:21:05:24 - 00:21:42:03<br>Jamie<br>Right? Creative. We had to convince people and and the deal had so much hair on it that it was there was virtually no other use for it. We had to renegotiate three ground leases. It joint ownership of the transmission line, a an electricity supply agreement with the utility and a cooperative transmission studies with ERCOT. We basically had to do six or seven transactions successfully in order to do this so that the previous owner realized how daunting it was for someone to buy this asset and how much hair there was on the deal.  </p>
<p>00:21:42:13 - 00:22:09:14<br>Jamie<br>And we were able to negotiate favorable terms that were effectively like, Look, this is going to be really hard to do and we'll pay you some money for just the option to let us try. So we paid them $1,000,000 at the close of the deal. And then upon the successful completion of these six or seven agreements, the transaction became structured as a little bit more in cash and mostly equity in the company.  </p>
<p>00:22:09:14 - 00:22:29:22<br>Jamie<br>So there the second largest investor in our company, and I believe that we will deliver them a great return over the long run on this wind farm that was effectively junk. And they turn they have a chance to turn trash into treasure through this company.  </p>
<p>00:22:29:28 - 00:22:56:25<br>Marty<br>Well, that's why it's creative in two ways. Number one, just the pure structuring of the deal. Basically acquire these assets in a smart way, in a capital efficient way that allows you to operate very profitably and get a payback on your initial investment quicker than you otherwise would have. And and to now that they're the second largest equity holder in your company, you have to imagine I imagine you probably know you definitely know better than I do.  </p>
<p>00:22:56:25 - 00:23:11:15<br>Marty<br>But if they're building wind farms, you understand the economic issues that these type of projects have now that they're investor and seeing what you guys are doing, I'm like, Oh shit, this is a solution to this massive problem that exists. Is that happening?  </p>
<p>00:23:12:23 - 00:24:03:13<br>Jamie<br>It's happening. It's happening gradually and across the spectrum of large institutional power market firms. You've got a huge range of Bitcoin acceptance and Bitcoin bullishness and orange Pilling. I'm surprised at how low it seems to be to me now, especially because bitcoin mining loads can really add a lot of value to generation fleets. One of the biggest problems in generation fleets is the forward power market in ERCOT right now is trading about $55 a megawatt hour for the next year.  </p>
<p>00:24:04:07 - 00:24:32:15<br>Jamie<br>It goes down a little bit. The further that you go out and gas is natural gas is very cheap. Natural gas, power plant power plants have a healthy operating margin. If they can secure a long term gas supply that's cheap and run it through a natural gas plant. Obviously wind and solar have no input fuel. So it's it's even a stronger value prop for them because they have no sensitivity to a fuel input cost.  </p>
<p>00:24:34:04 - 00:25:08:17<br>Jamie<br>The big boogeyman in the power market is that the volatility distribution of power prices in ERCOT is so large right now and it's growing because you have if you're a generator in this grid, you're absorbing power prices that go down to -24. The chance to get power prices that go up to positive 5000 per megawatt hour. And if you are a gas plant and you say, okay, I'm going to hedge a year of power because sure, it's going to be -20, it's going to be 5000.  </p>
<p>00:25:08:21 - 00:25:33:27<br>Jamie<br>I just want to lock that in and sell for $55. You it's very hard for you to structure what's called a unit contingent hedge, which means as long as my power plant is operating normally and it doesn't have a catastrophic maintenance issue, then you buyer of this offtake agreement from me, you will get your power. But if something happens to my plant, you're not going to get your power.  </p>
<p>00:25:36:05 - 00:25:58:29<br>Jamie<br>From what I understand, the buyers are more and more reluctant to do unit contingent deals. Deals that only deliver the power when the power plant is is operational and what that looks like basically is if something happens with the power plant during the summer when it's the hottest, you're more likely to have maintenance issues when you're running your plant really hard and it's very, very hot.  </p>
<p>00:26:01:04 - 00:26:42:08<br>Jamie<br>If you sell that hedge and your power plant goes offline, you're short power, your short power to the market and that opens you up to catastrophic risk as a company. If you put a Bitcoin mining load there, even with crappy equipment and you can put s19, there are signs there and then you have you don't need to hedge because you're you're selling electricity to the Bitcoin protocol at, you know, let's say the worst machines on the market is the M 30 S it makes about $85 megawatt hour.  </p>
<p>00:26:42:16 - 00:27:02:17<br>Jamie<br>The best machine is yes, 21 You're making close just under $200 a megawatt hour. You've got a PPA with the Bitcoin network. It's a variable price PPA and it's volatile, but you've got to PPA with the bitcoin network and you have a computing fleet that can power down 95% of its load in 3 seconds in response to prices.  </p>
<p>00:27:02:17 - 00:27:26:07<br>Jamie<br>So you would be able to keep your generation fleet running if your generator goes down, you just optimize the bitcoin load against the real time market. You already have that behavior there, but you then are gaining a call option where if your generation fleet is running and power prices go up, then you can deliver that power back to the grid and make make a lot of money there.  </p>
<p>00:27:26:21 - 00:28:12:20<br>Jamie<br>And so this is a it's a very appealing proposition from the perspective of a of a power market operator, power generation operation fleet. It's just that they're they're not there. I think that some of the bankruptcies, especially some of the early movers, the more open minded Bitcoin believers in the power industry, they invested in some of these firms that had very bad outcomes in 2022 and that scared and scared people off because there's just a ton of career risk for the junior guy at X, Y, Z, Energy Co who's I, We're going to go Bitcoin, we're going to do this or do A series B and we're going to sell a PPA to these guys  </p>
<p>00:28:12:20 - 00:28:21:29<br>Jamie<br>and this optimization deal. And next thing you know, you're in a bankruptcy court for two years and you're CEO and your legal team are like, This guy's a joker. And yeah, that's.  </p>
<p>00:28:22:23 - 00:28:23:22<br>Marty<br>We're not touching this.  </p>
<p>00:28:24:10 - 00:28:48:28<br>Jamie<br>We're not touching this. It's going to have to be built bottom up. It's going to have to be built by, in my opinion, by Bitcoin firms who already have Bitcoin risk, like we're wearing Bitcoin risk every single place in our business. There's no incremental risk to us to go into power generation other than the operating risks of the power generation, which are numerous and could easily destroy our company.  </p>
<p>00:28:48:28 - 00:28:50:24<br>Marty<br>At that point. And for a penny in for a pound.  </p>
<p>00:28:50:26 - 00:29:05:22<br>Jamie<br>That's right. There's well, we're not adding an incremental, uh, existential risk or career risk. It's already risk that we're wearing and we know we're going to consume power. And that's the most consistent part of our businesses. We will consume power.  </p>
<p>00:29:06:15 - 00:29:18:10<br>Marty<br>And then bringing this back to the renewable energy credits, particularly focusing on reliable hydrocarbon and nuclear to nuclear doesn't they're not able to take.  </p>
<p>00:29:18:19 - 00:29:19:05<br>Jamie<br>They are now.  </p>
<p>00:29:19:05 - 00:29:20:26<br>Marty<br>They are now. Okay, now they're. That's good.  </p>
<p>00:29:20:27 - 00:29:22:18<br>Jamie<br>Biden Biden threw him a bone.  </p>
<p>00:29:22:20 - 00:29:45:28<br>Marty<br>Okay, That's good. It's good to hear that. But honing in on natural gas in coal facilities that aren't able to reap the benefits of these credits, that's the threat I wrote over the weekend. I was at an event in Palm Beach on Saturday, and there was a panel talking about the quote unquote, climate crisis and energy markets. And this is the question I brought up.  </p>
<p>00:29:46:07 - 00:30:14:19<br>Marty<br>Knowing what we've seen in the Bitcoin mining industry is the renewable energy credits have created such a distortion in the pricing mechanism of the market that it is impossible to spin up new reliable generation. Not impossible, but very hard because you have these the material amount of times with negative pricing that really eats into the economic models of these reliable generation sources.  </p>
<p>00:30:15:05 - 00:30:50:00<br>Marty<br>And then it's just a if you're not going to decommission these reliable sources of your mandate, you just decommission them by distorting pricing mechanisms. And that's happening as well, where you have reliable sources that are up and running when they have to decommission themselves because they're not economically viable and I think it is imperative that the reliable generation sources that do not have the benefit of the recs that are out there really figure out a Bitcoin strategy because that is the only way that they're going to stay viable as long as these credits exist.  </p>
<p>00:30:51:01 - 00:31:22:07<br>Jamie<br>Absolutely. Yeah. And I wrote a in response to the the winter storm that we had here from Polar Vortex in January, I wrote a big tweet thread about this, which is that, I mean, if you look at what's happening here, so Texas is the second fastest or the fastest, I believe it is the fastest as of this year, the fastest growing renewable energy grid in America.  </p>
<p>00:31:22:16 - 00:31:47:17<br>Jamie<br>By volume. It's the number one wind state. It's going to be the number one solar state and west zone. A lot of this is going in in west Texas. West zone is 92% renewable installation by nameplate capacity. So this is like the grid of the future over there in West Texas, which is somewhat ironic given that it's, you know, a major hydrocarbon economy, but it is effectively the grid of the future over there.  </p>
<p>00:31:47:17 - 00:32:10:05<br>Jamie<br>So if you want to see what these utopian grid of the future ideas look like with all intermittent renewables, you just go look at West Texas and you can see what happens. There's some some system reliability issues because there's not as much inertia and rotating mass on the grid as when you have a bunch of coal plants and nuclear plants and combined cycle plants.  </p>
<p>00:32:10:16 - 00:32:44:03<br>Jamie<br>So you have a generation fleet that's more sensitive to a voltage issue somewhere else on the grid, meaning you could have cascading trips of multiple generators and then they trip off multiple loads and you could have blackouts with these largely renewable grids. You also have higher prices. On average, you have lower prices for 90% of the year. But the remaining 10% of the year is actually pushing prices up with the same gas prices that we had two or three years ago.  </p>
<p>00:32:44:16 - 00:33:12:20<br>Jamie<br>You know, if you exclude the Ukraine invasion when gas went to $10, the same natural gas, just to be clear, you have this of roughly the same gas price environment. The forward curve of power is twice as expensive and it's all coming from the shoulder. Our volatility when there's no solar and the wind hasn't picked up yet. And so people are paying more for power and they get a less reliable transmission grid.  </p>
<p>00:33:12:28 - 00:33:39:06<br>Jamie<br>So it is like this the the fastest growing renewable energy grids. I don't think the people who live in them understand that we are voluntarily degrading our standard of energy availability from a very first world standard to closer to a second world standard. And at the same time, we are paying more for a less reliable product. And that's just facts.  </p>
<p>00:33:39:06 - 00:34:03:09<br>Jamie<br>I mean, you know, it would be great if we could transition to a a future where we harness the power of the sun via wind speeds and and photovoltaic energy generation to power our species. But this transition right now, if you look at the early stages of it's like this is people are making a bad trade here. They're paying more for a worse product.  </p>
<p>00:34:03:22 - 00:34:19:27<br>Jamie<br>And at the same time, the federal government is going further and further into debt to to effectively subsidize this D reliability D reliability rising process of the power grid.  </p>
<p>00:34:20:06 - 00:34:41:10<br>Marty<br>Well, and going back to like the voltage synchronization and I learned Steve Koonin was at this event, he was explaining this over the weekend where basically with the natural gas plant a plant, a coal plant within the turbines, they can synchronize like the push and pull through the transmission lines where that does not exist for wind and solar, which is right, enters.  </p>
<p>00:34:42:01 - 00:34:46:28<br>Marty<br>It introduces this destabilizing effect that can lead to these rolling blackouts, correct?  </p>
<p>00:34:47:03 - 00:35:29:21<br>Jamie<br>Right. Yeah, it's called voltage, right through effectively, um, gas and anything that has a turbine that has this rotating mass that is being used to generate electricity, any turbine mechanism, the more rotating mass and inertia you have on, on a power grid, the right way to think about it is like it's like pressure in your tires. You're just it's you hit a little bump in the there and you don't feel it, uh, with inverter based renewables, wind and solar, you lose that inertia and you lose.  </p>
<p>00:35:29:21 - 00:35:54:19<br>Jamie<br>It's like your tire becomes slightly deflated, so you're going to feel a bit more shock. And that just to continue the busted AC analogy, if it works or not, it's like you hit a bump that's big enough and the bump actually hits your hubcap and hits it hits your ear, your wheel axle, or, you know, whatever the appropriate automotive part is and it dents it and it knocks your your car's alignment off.  </p>
<p>00:35:54:19 - 00:36:27:23<br>Jamie<br>In this case, it's you have a one system, one piece of the system trips and the sensitivity of the other pieces of the system will then trip in response to that and they can solve it. The solution is that the utilities need to upgrade different hubs, you know, different big substations are connection points within the system with shock absorbing equipment, and that then gets added into the transmission charges that consumers pay the next year.  </p>
<p>00:36:27:23 - 00:36:40:00<br>Jamie<br>And so you have to have beefier transmission infrastructure to be able to absorb of these shocks. And that's another way that costs go up. It's just not not energy costs, it's transmission costs in that case. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:36:40:22 - 00:36:49:19<br>Marty<br>So in your mind, what is the ideal mix of these unreliable generation sources and reliable generation sources?  </p>
<p>00:36:51:19 - 00:37:24:25<br>Jamie<br>I see both sides where if you can get the cost of solar and batteries and wind low enough and subsidies, push that demand to drive innovation in that and you upgrade the grid, you do end up having a lower cost of electricity because you're not relying on fuels. So you can see that it is utopian. It's far it's extremely difficult to understand if you have a constrained economic view.  </p>
<p>00:37:25:09 - 00:37:47:18<br>Jamie<br>So just as an example, right now, because of the amount of solar that's currently installed in West Texas and the amount that is coming in West Texas. And so if for, say, West Texas is the grid of the future, let's look what this market looks like. There's nobody will buy a power purchase agreement from a solar plant in West Texas.  </p>
<p>00:37:48:07 - 00:38:16:28<br>Jamie<br>And so you can't get that project financed anymore. So we're we're at we're hitting a wall in terms of the willingness of financial market counterparties and lenders to purchase this power for a term that is sufficient to underwrite the lender on it. So that means someone's got to put equity to to build a solar plant and no one's going to do that because you're just giving up a cash return for a fixed return.  </p>
<p>00:38:17:21 - 00:38:46:00<br>Jamie<br>It just doesn't make sense to do that. And through that and a number of other constraints, including grid volatility, battery economic viability, and we can spend 30 minutes just talking about this. It's really hard to see how we get there without having a centrally planned economy that's extremely inefficient for a while. It's already somewhat inefficient. We have this distorting signal production tax credits.  </p>
<p>00:38:46:07 - 00:39:13:06<br>Jamie<br>It's hard to see how we get there using our market economy. I think they should give nuclear a $50 production tax credit. They should give nuclear a $50 production tax credit. The government should subsidize the storage and and removal of nuclear waste. And we can decarbonize our grid since that's what a good percentage of the American people want and vote for by building nuclear plants.  </p>
<p>00:39:13:06 - 00:39:39:21<br>Jamie<br>And there's so much innovation with vision. You have small modular reactors, molten salt reactors, you have really good vision technologies that are much safer than, you know, the historical fission reactors that have melted down a few times in other places. And France, for all the things that they that they may not be the best at, like winning wars or whatnot.  </p>
<p>00:39:41:11 - 00:40:08:09<br>Jamie<br>They are great at nuclear, they have a great nuclear industry. They don't have a history of accidents. And the French government subsidizes the removal and storage of nuclear waste. And now they're one of the best performing European economies. In response to the the shortage of gas and having to import all this LNG and having those pipelines cut off from Russia.  </p>
<p>00:40:08:16 - 00:40:32:02<br>Jamie<br>The French economy from an electricity standpoint, is doing great because they rely on nuclear. And if you look at that, at the carbon footprint of the French power grid versus the German power grid, now that Germany has decommissioned its new plants, it's relying on tons of wind and tons of solar and then lost its access to natural gas.  </p>
<p>00:40:32:16 - 00:40:34:18<br>Jamie<br>They're burning wood pellets over there. They're burning wood.  </p>
<p>00:40:34:18 - 00:40:41:29<br>Marty<br>Pellets. They're cutting down forests in North Carolina, and we're shipping over wood pellets so that they can power their economy in Germany.  </p>
<p>00:40:42:00 - 00:41:06:03<br>Jamie<br>Exactly. And and they're paying more for power. And they're they're emitting more carbon than they were before. And it's extremely ironic that the German Green Party is so dumb and they did suffer a bunch of defeat in recent elections. So the German people are waking up, they're waking up, they're picking up on this being just really bad, illogical policy.  </p>
<p>00:41:06:03 - 00:41:16:14<br>Marty<br>But they're losing major incumbent industry that's been around for well over a century. BASF is moving out. Some manufacturers are moving out. They like it's too expensive. I can't do it here anymore.  </p>
<p>00:41:16:24 - 00:41:21:20<br>Jamie<br>And that should be scary for the world. Historically, a weak German economy has not led to good things.  </p>
<p>00:41:23:22 - 00:42:00:15<br>Marty<br>It is insane how we've gotten to this point because that's I wrote the piece in the Bitcoin Times Energy edition and I focused on Germany and it is insane what they did over the first two decades of the century. Like in 2002, their overall generation capacity was 115 gigawatts, 84% of it was nuclear or coal, nat gas. Since then, they've expanded their generation capacity by more than two X to 240 gigawatts, and the percentage of those re reliable sources of overall generation capacity is 34%.  </p>
<p>00:42:01:03 - 00:42:05:29<br>Marty<br>They decommissioned 20 more than 20 gigawatts of nuclear power. That was over that time.  </p>
<p>00:42:06:04 - 00:42:08:02<br>Jamie<br>I mean, it's a real head scratcher.  </p>
<p>00:42:08:19 - 00:42:29:17<br>Marty<br>And that's really the question there because like you think you more than double capacity. People look at that like, oh, that's awesome. Whatever that same time period, the amount of terawatt produced in 2002 versus 2021, which is when I ran the analysis too, fell by 2%.  </p>
<p>00:42:29:17 - 00:42:29:27<br>Jamie<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:42:30:13 - 00:42:35:23<br>Marty<br>And went from 53 terawatt hours a year to 51 point something.  </p>
<p>00:42:36:00 - 00:42:36:09<br>Jamie<br>Right.  </p>
<p>00:42:36:16 - 00:43:02:21<br>Marty<br>And then the price of electricity for your average three person German household went up 187%. Yeah. Over that time period. And I think that is the perfect case study that anybody in the world deploying an energy policy needs to look at and say get I get everybody wants to decarbonize. I personally don't think that is what we should be doing.  </p>
<p>00:43:02:21 - 00:43:23:16<br>Marty<br>I don't think I think the carbon the story is just that a hysteria, fear mongering campaign. I think we should be as efficient as possible, as clean as possible. But I don't think we should write these sources off just because they produce carbon emissions. But putting that aside, just looking at what Germany did, it's like we have the playbook here.  </p>
<p>00:43:23:16 - 00:43:24:14<br>Marty<br>It does not end well.  </p>
<p>00:43:26:18 - 00:44:10:20<br>Jamie<br>100%. Yeah, and I mean, we talked earlier about wind capacity factor is 30% of the year roughly. That's the number of megawatt hours you get for every one megawatt of installed wind. Solar is even worse. It's it's about 20%, 15 to 20%, depending on how strong the photovoltaics are. And so, yeah, you can double or triple the installed capacity of renewable generators, but because they're not generating when necessarily when there's peak demand, because they don't have the ability to ramp up production in response to peak demand and it.  </p>
<p>00:44:10:20 - 00:44:23:04<br>Marty<br>Should be common sense like when, when is peak demand come, when is really hot, why is it really part of the reason is the wind is blowing. And the other end of the spectrum is when it's really cold. And why is it really cold is because the clouds are blocking the sun.  </p>
<p>00:44:23:18 - 00:44:57:05<br>Jamie<br>It's right. Yeah. And and I mean wind in particular is really quite a I've gone as far as to say that wind power is poised for an electrical grid. Maybe a little extreme. If there's enough batteries, it would be okay. But if you look at a wind production, it is it peaks in the middle of the night when no one is using it and it declines to its lowest output level at the the hottest part of the day.  </p>
<p>00:44:57:18 - 00:45:28:24<br>Jamie<br>And every record power price day we had in ERCOT last summer was a low wind day. People don't even look at load as the the driving factor for peak pricing. They look at a metric called net load, which is load minus renewables. And so you could have a really hot day and and a ton of demand on the system.  </p>
<p>00:45:29:03 - 00:45:52:22<br>Jamie<br>But if the wind is blowing, you're going to be okay. You know, in the solar there's going to be generating and if the wind is blowing, you'll be okay. If there's no wind, it could not even be necessarily that hot of a day. And you'll have 5000 megawatt hour pricing. And it's the the the the electricity consumption peak every day of the summer happens.  </p>
<p>00:45:52:22 - 00:46:20:16<br>Jamie<br>At the same time it is between four and 5 p.m.. That is always when demand is peaking as the sun's been going ripping away for a long period the day it finally starts to decline and now it is like it's following a clock. 5 p.m. power demand starts to drop off as it starts to cool down because the sun is less intense and that used to be the highest price point of the day.  </p>
<p>00:46:20:16 - 00:46:47:21<br>Jamie<br>You know, it makes sense. That's the hottest. That's when power demand is the highest that should be the highest price. The demand for it, the good is highest. So that would be when the price is high. And power, of course, it's extremely temporally sensitive. It's a different price every 5 minutes in ERCOT Now because of the prevalence of solar, the actual price peak has shifted out by over 2 hours.  </p>
<p>00:46:47:28 - 00:47:26:00<br>Jamie<br>So it's no longer 4 to 5 p.m., it's now 7:08 p.m.. 7 to 10 p.m. is where you have peak pricing because the sun has gone down and almost every day like a clock, 7 to 10 this past August, a little bit of June summer, July and September, the prices were at administrative caps of $5,000. So through this price distorting and market distorting signal of production tax credit, we've actually shifted the the peak price of power out to a vector that is no longer consistent where there's peak demand and ideal.  </p>
<p>00:47:28:02 - 00:47:30:04<br>Jamie<br>Not not ideal, not ideal.  </p>
<p>00:47:30:06 - 00:47:50:09<br>Marty<br>So how do you square that? I think Korn meant you guys are using wind West Texas is the the future of energy grids everywhere. Is this just an anomalous awkward period where figure out how to use this or is this simply pure central planning corruption that needs to be fixed?  </p>
<p>00:47:51:26 - 00:48:30:00<br>Jamie<br>I see both sides and I love renewable energy. My business is economically viable and profitable because of this price distortion and we are following the price signals that are centrally planning overlords are are telling us to follow and we our load being where it is is contributing to the demand to build more these projects. And so you know in a way this cheap energy is creating a flourishing economic environment for the Bitcoin community in West Texas is it's what's happening there right now, which is kind of cool.  </p>
<p>00:48:30:16 - 00:49:25:11<br>Jamie<br>And I also think another really unique thing about it is that Bitcoin ers are the only people who are and not the only people, but they're consistently among the ranks, people who regularly tell the truth about power markets. Like everything else that Bitcoiners touch, they rabidly devour the available information. They learn entirely new disciplines and they become extremely educated on the all of the contributing factors to whatever situation is going on, whether it's, you know, distributed systems engineering, the history of money, you know, the history of various schools of economic thought cryptography, chip fabrication, chip manufacturing, silicon, all of this, all of these disciplines, bitcoiners, they learn about them.  </p>
<p>00:49:25:17 - 00:49:45:18<br>Jamie<br>They start sharing their reactions to these ideas and how they interplay with Bitcoin. And then you you listen to a Bitcoin or talk about one of those things that guys one of the probably the smartest people in the world on that particular thing. And now we see all these bitcoiners who are really smart about power. They're just going in and trying to tell the truth.  </p>
<p>00:49:47:03 - 00:50:07:27<br>Jamie<br>Cormac does not necessarily have a dog in the fight. We're taking advantage of the current distorted market. We're consuming lots of cheap power. We're profitably converting it into Bitcoin and I would say a second derivative of, yes, we don't have a dog in the fight. We're not going to tell you we want this generation type over that generation type.  </p>
<p>00:50:07:27 - 00:50:40:25<br>Jamie<br>All we want is cheap generation. We want the cheap as possible generation. As a second derivative of that, we become stakeholders in wherever we are situated. Jurisdiction. Ali and I like I have enormous exposure. Every employee in my company, every executive has enormous exposure to the reliability of the Texas grid, the cost of the Texas grid and the overall well-being of our electricity marketplace as an orderly and function place functioning place to do business.  </p>
<p>00:50:41:06 - 00:51:09:29<br>Jamie<br>And so you get this second derivative where educated, open minded and unbiased bitcoiners come in and tell the truth about this stuff. And I, I really don't think it's a coincidence that every Bitcoin here resoundingly says the same exact thing. We have to nuclearized the entire economy. And it's almost like the opposite of a politician where there is no NIMBY, there's there's none of that.  </p>
<p>00:51:09:29 - 00:51:38:10<br>Jamie<br>It's just unadulterated truth. And if you contrast that with a politician, you have this this rabid voter base who's hysterical about carbon and they're, you know, paving themselves to roads and throwing paint on throwing oil on paintings and being hysterical. They're single issue voters on climate. It is what it is, right or wrong. True or not, it is what it is.  </p>
<p>00:51:39:18 - 00:52:10:21<br>Jamie<br>Getting elected requires pandering to those voters. And you can see that in the Venn diagram of I'm doing something about decarbonizing the economy and ideal policy in terms of going to going to get me reelected. Nuclear is not in the middle of that Venn diagram because nuclear pisses people off. People don't want nuke plants in their backyard. They're not educated about nuclear safety and the improvements in the industry.  </p>
<p>00:52:10:29 - 00:52:35:19<br>Jamie<br>And so building a bunch of dumb wind turbines, building too many wind turbines and solar panels that create a massive distortion in power markets, raise prices and reduce reliability. That ends up being the Venn diagram place where you can appear to be doing something. It's going to be enough for four years to get reelected, and you're not actually a long term stakeholder in what you're doing.  </p>
<p>00:52:35:19 - 00:52:48:16<br>Jamie<br>It's really bad politics and I don't know how it's going to change. I don't know who's going to be the nuclear renaissance man. Nobody listens to Bitcoiners anyways, So it's.  </p>
<p>00:52:48:29 - 00:52:59:03<br>Marty<br>I should start. I think we just need to start buying these assets. That's happening too. I've seen it. It's one of my you U.S. people are buying coal plants. People are buying that gas generation.  </p>
<p>00:52:59:11 - 00:53:03:01<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, because they're building new plants. One of my long term goals.  </p>
<p>00:53:03:08 - 00:53:08:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah. It's a virtuous goal to strive for. Thank you for striving for it.  </p>
<p>00:53:08:16 - 00:53:17:02<br>Jamie<br>It's hard. I mean, they don't make it easy. Yeah. Every engineering decision in a nuke plant gets ten x the scrutiny of of a solar plant.  </p>
<p>00:53:17:12 - 00:53:40:28<br>Marty<br>Well, that's. I spoke with somebody who runs a nuclear power plant in Nebraska a couple of weeks ago, and they have this exact problem overbuilding wind specifically. And they want, I think, 20% of the year. The nuke plant has negative pricing. And they just said that because that's the other thing where the pricing corruption do, the subsidies comes in is nuke plants.  </p>
<p>00:53:40:28 - 00:53:57:08<br>Marty<br>You can't just spin them up and down. Yeah, you have to keep them on, you know, And so these plants have to eat that negative pricing when it comes. And it's becoming longer periods of time throughout the year as these subsidies incentivize all this unreliable generation.  </p>
<p>00:53:57:24 - 00:54:11:23<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, it's it's really it is a truly distorting price signal because it is actively disincentivizing the type of generation that the grid needs to at least maintain reliability or improve it.  </p>
<p>00:54:12:00 - 00:54:23:16<br>Marty<br>Bitcoin fixes this. Just fucking put 100 megawatts of a mining operation behind the meter, right? Give the finger to the wind farms. When the negative pricing comes, say, hey, we're producing revenue anyway.  </p>
<p>00:54:23:27 - 00:54:30:00<br>Jamie<br>Definitely. Yeah. It it fits so well with reliable generation and avoiding negative prices.  </p>
<p>00:54:30:08 - 00:54:30:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:54:30:29 - 00:54:33:27<br>Jamie<br>Especially like the crappier rigs.  </p>
<p>00:54:34:06 - 00:54:54:13<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And luckily it does seem like the bitcoin mining industry is becoming more smart about this, particularly behind the meter. To date it's been a lot of front of the meter, um, basically getting electricity from a substation that's connected to transmission line. I think a lot of people in the industry are like, how do we get closer to the source?  </p>
<p>00:54:54:13 - 00:55:00:14<br>Marty<br>Let's go to the Wright Power facility and get to the point before it even goes through the transmission light.  </p>
<p>00:55:01:07 - 00:55:34:18<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, you do avoid a bunch of transmission costs. If you do that in ERCOT, you can get a nodal price instead of a zonal price. And nodal prices tend to be lower than zonal prices because the every every power generation facility in ERCOT has a node. It has its own pricing point on the grid. And every load on ERCOT has they don't have a specific nodal location.  </p>
<p>00:55:34:26 - 00:56:02:06<br>Jamie<br>It gets blended into what's called the load zone. And inside of the load zone, all transmission charges to route power to different users throughout the grid are basically aggregated and then averaged and split across all consumers. So in the West Zone right now, because there's a lot of Bitcoin miners popping up, there's a lot of renewable generators popping up and things are growing and moving pretty fast out there.  </p>
<p>00:56:02:19 - 00:56:31:00<br>Jamie<br>The trends, the transmission cost to serve loads that are isolated specifically in the far west of Texas are really really high. And so those costs then get subsidized across the entire load zone because what they don't want, and it does make sense, is they don't want a particular load in a very remote corner corner of the grid. They have to pay ten times the cost of every other load in the in the grid for generators.  </p>
<p>00:56:31:06 - 00:56:49:12<br>Jamie<br>They're willing to to do that. And they want to incentivize generation to go in the right places on the grid. But for load, there's very little tolerance for a particular electrical load to pay a drastically higher price, higher price. And so the cost to serve that load is set by the market and by the generators, and that's averaged across everybody else.  </p>
<p>00:56:51:06 - 00:57:17:11<br>Jamie<br>And as a result, the the additional transmission charges to those loads that are in very remote places, they end up driving up the average price everywhere else. If you are behind the meter next to your own generator, you don't you avoid all those charges. And in the summertime, when the entire generation fleet is ripping, these transmission charges are relatively low.  </p>
<p>00:57:17:11 - 00:57:45:00<br>Jamie<br>It's called congestion or basis. But as soon as the weather cools down and the system has much less load on it, so starting in October and basically going through May, the basis has been averaging over $10 a megawatt hour. So you're paying a four penny higher during those outside months. So if you co-locate with a generator and just do a direct agreement with them, you get that generator pricing.  </p>
<p>00:57:45:00 - 00:58:12:28<br>Jamie<br>And it is a huge event. It's a it's another reason why the energy community should move close to the Bitcoin community because the same thing could happen to them. Like if you have a a power generation node that's in the middle of 25 wind farms, you're going to get the lowest prices on the grid for your power because you're producing in a place where there is no user, there aren't not very many users of the power feeds.  </p>
<p>00:58:12:29 - 00:58:19:24<br>Jamie<br>Bring in a bitcoin mining load. You're like, Oh cool, I'm out of that now. I got my own. Come on, little guy here. And he just takes all the power I give him.  </p>
<p>00:58:20:00 - 00:58:30:15<br>Marty<br>And it seems like bitcoin adoption is picking up, the price is going up. That's another thing heading into the having which is less than 10,000 blocks away after this weekend.  </p>
<p>00:58:30:24 - 00:58:31:15<br>Jamie<br>Don't remind me.  </p>
<p>00:58:33:13 - 00:58:46:16<br>Marty<br>But it is an interesting dynamic heading into the having if this price appreciation continues. Yeah, so it seems like a very unique dynamic that hasn't existed in a pre having market today.  </p>
<p>00:58:46:17 - 00:58:52:16<br>Jamie<br>We've got rapidly rising difficulty. We've got rapidly rising price. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:58:52:29 - 00:58:58:09<br>Marty<br>What 50 day 50 K congratulations. Let's go or a 50 K.  </p>
<p>00:58:58:16 - 00:59:01:24<br>Jamie<br>So we haven't been above 50,000 since I think.  </p>
<p>00:59:01:27 - 00:59:02:05<br>Marty<br>20.  </p>
<p>00:59:02:05 - 00:59:06:00<br>Jamie<br>One April of 2022. Or was it 22.  </p>
<p>00:59:06:00 - 00:59:11:04<br>Marty<br>I think it was like I think now because yeah, we peaked in November 21.  </p>
<p>00:59:11:07 - 00:59:24:04<br>Jamie<br>We peaked at and just below 70 in November and then we stayed around So it might have been between. Yeah, it's been a while. Yeah. Welcome back, boys. Let's go. Cool.  </p>
<p>00:59:24:10 - 00:59:30:07<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Exciting prices for everybody, as you said. Hash rates absolutely screaming right now. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:59:30:25 - 00:59:37:16<br>Jamie<br>And fees. We've had a couple of periods where fees have been surprisingly high, too. So it's spending. Yeah, it's been a wild time.  </p>
<p>00:59:37:28 - 00:59:41:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So what what are you worried about heading into the havoc?  </p>
<p>00:59:42:02 - 01:00:03:01<br>Jamie<br>I think the thing I'm most interested to see is what kind of difficulty adjustment happens. Um, after the having Seems like there's a huge range of predictions. And did you ever read the COIN metrics report called the Signal and the nonce?  </p>
<p>01:00:03:20 - 01:00:04:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah, the cream. Right.  </p>
<p>01:00:04:15 - 01:00:17:23<br>Jamie<br>That I, I think so, but I'm not 100% sure. But effectively what they did was they used nonce patterns in the, you know, the machines that make up the majority of.  </p>
<p>01:00:18:00 - 01:00:24:10<br>Marty<br>Yeah, you can essentially the reverse engineer which machine is producing which nonce.  </p>
<p>01:00:24:19 - 01:00:25:05<br>Jamie<br>Exactly.  </p>
<p>01:00:25:14 - 01:00:34:01<br>Marty<br>And so you can get a use the chain data to get a landscape of the inventory of machines that are being used exactly in point in time.  </p>
<p>01:00:34:05 - 01:01:10:29<br>Jamie<br>And so you look at that report, it was released at the end of 2022. I'm not sure when the dataset they used was, but as of the end of 2022, 60 of the network was um, s19 and thirties or, or lower efficiency machines. So right around 30 to 35 joules per T and just looking at the break evens of that equipment and where we are today, I think as the next difficulty adjustment is projected to be 9%.  </p>
<p>01:01:11:15 - 01:01:13:23<br>Jamie<br>Yes, yes. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:01:14:06 - 01:01:21:22<br>Marty<br>And I look at look up the estimate, the hash rate of all that space above 600, it'll.  </p>
<p>01:01:21:22 - 01:01:41:29<br>Jamie<br>Be above 600 with that adjustment and uh, the, the break even now Bitcoin rip and so this information may be stale, but let's say that after this 10% difficulty adjustment and given the fact that we just probably rallied 10% over the last six or seven days, the break evens there are in the high seventies, mid to high seventies.  </p>
<p>01:01:43:06 - 01:01:45:00<br>Marty<br>696, 91 six.  </p>
<p>01:01:45:00 - 01:01:45:13<br>Jamie<br>92.  </p>
<p>01:01:45:15 - 01:01:49:06<br>Marty<br>For our estimate. So yeah, take that with a small grain of salt.  </p>
<p>01:01:49:08 - 01:02:10:03<br>Jamie<br>Right. So you have break evens in the mid-to-high seventies right now and you know having are going to bring that to the having is going to bring that to $37 in megawatt hour 37 or $39 megawatt hour. Not a lot of people who have power costs set it below all in power costs that are below $37 a megawatt hour.  </p>
<p>01:02:10:16 - 01:02:13:08<br>Marty<br>3.7 cents a kilowatt hour right out there.  </p>
<p>01:02:13:21 - 01:02:48:24<br>Jamie<br>And so I'm a big believer that we're going to have adjustments, going to have material downside difficulty adjustments in April and May and in previous cycles, ones that I've been seeing a bunch thrown around is the number of days it takes it has taken historically post having for hashrate to recover to its previous value immediately prior to the having and it's been the the last two halvings were between 30 and 70 days that hashrate fully recovered.  </p>
<p>01:02:49:05 - 01:03:21:29<br>Jamie<br>But now we have so much of the hash rate is in ERCOT and so we have April 20th having projection date of May, and then we immediately start the Texas summer where last summer during a Bitcoin bull market and a little bit of an upward upward momentum market difficulty barely adjusted at all through the entirety of the June 15th through September 15th period.  </p>
<p>01:03:22:04 - 01:03:24:28<br>Marty<br>As miners were participating in demand response.  </p>
<p>01:03:25:09 - 01:03:51:07<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, because there was it was active curtailment and and there is demand response, which was curtailing miners. And it was a pretty hot summer everywhere. So that was every northern hemisphere grid. And the ERCOT obviously being the biggest one with a very, very hot high electricity price summer. So I think we could see that hashrate does not fully recover until fall October.  </p>
<p>01:03:51:14 - 01:04:07:15<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, October would be my prediction for when hash rate is going to recover to its previous level from before. The having with the caveat that if Bitcoin just goes on an absolute heater throughout the rest of the year all, all bets are off.  </p>
<p>01:04:07:15 - 01:04:14:03<br>Marty<br>Yeah we run the like if Sam samples we run to 100 K before the having happens. That helps a lot of things.  </p>
<p>01:04:14:08 - 01:04:15:03<br>Jamie<br>That would be wild.  </p>
<p>01:04:15:13 - 01:04:34:03<br>Marty<br>But then you have this dynamic to two dynamics at play where the sweaty ones are coming to market. It seems like Bitmain's going to be able to produce a lot of them. Yeah, I'm ten a month out between 50 and 100,000 per month. Most efficient, highest hashing machines that we've ever seen. They have a hydro unit which is even.  </p>
<p>01:04:34:03 - 01:04:34:16<br>Jamie<br>More.  </p>
<p>01:04:35:02 - 01:04:37:06<br>Marty<br>Efficient, higher hashing.  </p>
<p>01:04:37:18 - 01:04:39:24<br>Jamie<br>Which even are a lot of people buying those hydros.  </p>
<p>01:04:39:26 - 01:04:40:20<br>Marty<br>I'm not sure. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:04:40:22 - 01:04:42:24<br>Jamie<br>I mean, you know, I'm sorry to interrupt.  </p>
<p>01:04:42:24 - 01:04:55:01<br>Marty<br>You know, I'm not sure, but we have that dynamic coming and it seems like they're already being plugged in, which I would imagine a lot of the hashrate growth that we've seen over the last few weeks is anyone's getting plugged in and they have a log.  </p>
<p>01:04:55:01 - 01:04:55:23<br>Jamie<br>Of 20 ones.  </p>
<p>01:04:55:29 - 01:05:07:21<br>Marty<br>Then you have this confluence of events where the international markets seem to be seeing what's going on here in Texas and begin to get into the hash hash rates, if you will.  </p>
<p>01:05:08:09 - 01:05:35:22<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, for sure. The other thing, but the S21 is the research that's coming out on them is they're very thermally sensitive so that that hash rate will also be restricted in light of their during the summer. Yeah. Yeah. So it's it could all come online and then there could be a big adjustment from lower uptime. All of those S nineties and M thirties going offline a lot of curtailment for power optimization.  </p>
<p>01:05:36:16 - 01:05:37:09<br>Jamie<br>It's going to be interesting.  </p>
<p>01:05:37:16 - 01:05:43:02<br>Marty<br>A lot of them will be in low power mode throughout the summer. Oh yeah. Which they made easy with this, this model.  </p>
<p>01:05:43:22 - 01:05:44:07<br>Jamie<br>Oh they did.  </p>
<p>01:05:44:15 - 01:05:45:00<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>01:05:45:06 - 01:05:51:00<br>Jamie<br>Okay. So you it's you don't need as much the third party firmwares.  </p>
<p>01:05:51:21 - 01:06:03:06<br>Marty<br>Now you probably would benefit from it because you can probably get more modular with what you want to do But they do have stuck power mode, high power mode and low power mode.  </p>
<p>01:06:03:08 - 01:06:07:06<br>Jamie<br>Do they have a curtailment, uh, function? That's. That's good.  </p>
<p>01:06:07:13 - 01:06:08:03<br>Marty<br>I doubt it.  </p>
<p>01:06:08:24 - 01:06:15:06<br>Jamie<br>I'm not sure. It's wild, man. Yeah, And is there any other industry where the the manufacturer of a good.  </p>
<p>01:06:15:10 - 01:06:16:08<br>Marty<br>Case us such.  </p>
<p>01:06:16:08 - 01:06:21:08<br>Jamie<br>Distinct customer base that regularly mistreats them and there's very little consequence.  </p>
<p>01:06:21:12 - 01:06:28:00<br>Marty<br>So there's only two really. One, maybe we can call it a duopoly, but it's trending towards a monopoly.  </p>
<p>01:06:28:01 - 01:06:33:07<br>Jamie<br>Right. Um, I have heard good things about uh, or down.  </p>
<p>01:06:35:22 - 01:06:36:09<br>Marty<br>Were done.  </p>
<p>01:06:36:13 - 01:06:38:12<br>Jamie<br>Or a been is a.  </p>
<p>01:06:38:13 - 01:06:45:24<br>Marty<br>It's the ones that did the, the they basically have there is like a North American Bitcoin conference. Um, release it.  </p>
<p>01:06:46:16 - 01:07:29:24<br>Jamie<br>I would, I don't remember seeing them there but I'm sure that they did um marathon disclosed a a seed investment in them early on and um, they're now releasing their first ASICs uh, and they're good and they are, they have the functionality that a Texas based Bitcoin miner would care about. They can under clock, they can overclock, they curtail really quickly and the you don't need to use third party firmware it's all built right into the the miner firmware, the stock firmware and it's great tool kit.  </p>
<p>01:07:30:16 - 01:07:52:12<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So let's dive into this a little more for anybody who may be ignorant to this dynamic in the mining industry, which is you have these machines, you get them from the manufacturer or the manufacturer has a firmware that basically runs the machines. But miners, particularly in ERCOT, need to do more of their machines, particularly if they want to participate in demand response.  </p>
<p>01:07:52:21 - 01:08:14:04<br>Marty<br>Mainly they need to be able to turn down very quickly, which the stock firmware does not enable. So you have to go to third party firmware services that essentially jailbreak the firmware on your basic, inject their own firmware that can then communicate with the pricing API to to do all this in an efficient manner.  </p>
<p>01:08:16:03 - 01:08:45:05<br>Jamie<br>Yeah. And uh, the, the core features that you would want, well, take a step back, you sort of have two main categories of functionality. You have performance, meaning how many watts can I run through my chip and, and the more watts that I run through my chip, I may lose efficiency a little bit, but I'm going to get more Bitcoin out of it because I'm going to be submitting more valid shares to a pool.  </p>
<p>01:08:45:05 - 01:09:17:09<br>Jamie<br>I'm going to be attempting more solutions at a successfully mined block. Then you have a separate functionality, which is the ability to respond to either a signal which is called a base point or a frequency based point from the grid operator, which will say, Hey, I need you to set your machine to this, and you have to respond to that quickly, or you're responding to a free market power price input or the ERCOT pricing API prices every 5 minutes.  </p>
<p>01:09:17:18 - 01:09:50:00<br>Jamie<br>You respond to that data and then you power down the miner or continue mining based on that that price input. So neither of those functionalities comes out of the box with the existing manufacturers that you would know. And so like you said, this third party firmware is effectively jailbreak the that the miner and they allow a and non manufacturer firmware to run on top of it.  </p>
<p>01:09:50:00 - 01:10:20:10<br>Jamie<br>And these farmers are great and they're they're way better and on the overclocking and under clocking side it's not really surprising that the basic manufacturers aren't thinking like this because they're not really mining that much. Maybe because they don't focus as much on cooling, but cooling is so important. It is the name of the game. This is why immersion in hydro y immersion is sort of dominating now in terms of performance and hydro is the next level of it.  </p>
<p>01:10:21:02 - 01:10:49:14<br>Jamie<br>Immersion is your miners are submerged in an oil bath and it becomes a fluid dynamics equation instead of an aerodynamics equations. They're just constantly pumping oil that is colder than the chips through the miners because the oil is coating 100% of the surface area of the chips instead of air, which is not hitting anywhere near 100% of the chips, you're able to dissipate more heat off of the chip into the fluid.  </p>
<p>01:10:49:23 - 01:11:37:25<br>Jamie<br>And the fluid is exhausted outside of the tub that the miners are sitting in. And it's put through some kind of radiator dry, cooler heat exchanger type of thing. And it's a constant loop. You have a big plumbing equation, you have a big fluid dynamics equation, and that helps you draw more heat off the chips. The reason why that's important is because the ideal operating temperature of a chip is 60 degrees Celsius plus or minus, and then the you can run a ton of wattage through a chip way more than it's standard operating spec as long as the chip stays at 60 C, it's not going to cause any harm to it.  </p>
<p>01:11:37:25 - 01:12:01:29<br>Jamie<br>So these things are incredibly robust and there's no other reason why the manufacturers maybe aren't that clued into this or they don't care is because there's no other computing industry that treats a computer like a Corvette, you know, where they're just like, dump the fuel in, Let's go. We want to get as many horsepower out of this thing as possible and as many RPMs as possible, because it's a vanity engine.  </p>
<p>01:12:02:10 - 01:12:30:28<br>Jamie<br>Bitcoin mining is effectively like that because each incremental watt of electricity you push through gets you an incremental quantity of SATs or fractions of said in the case of Watt. And so you have this this big thermal optimization. What that ends up looking like in Texas, if you have a good cooling system, is you're able to overclock your machines sometimes as much as 20 or 30% in the winter when the ambient temperature is cold enough.  </p>
<p>01:12:31:08 - 01:12:58:17<br>Jamie<br>And in the summertime you're actually you actually have to do the opposite. Like we're out in the West Texas desert, it gets well above 100 degrees almost every day. And so that's the thermal, the cooling capacity. Thermally speaking of our cooling system, which is normally very good at dissipating heat, it actually is reduced because the containers are hotter.  </p>
<p>01:12:58:28 - 01:13:31:24<br>Jamie<br>The air outside that you're using to cool the fluid is hotter, everything is hotter. And so you have to reduce the amount of wattage that you're pushing through the machine in order to target that 60 degrees Celsius temperature. And so what this company or Dean has done really well, from what we understand, we haven't tested them out, but we've talked to enough smart guys who we trust that have tested them is they allow you to tune the minor voltage and frequency up, which gets you a different wattage draw from the stock setting.  </p>
<p>01:13:31:24 - 01:13:56:16<br>Jamie<br>You can go way down. And when you do that, drastically improve the efficiency of the machine. You can also go way up and you decrease the efficiency of the machine. And the reason why that's important is because if power is if the cost of electricity is zero, you want to push as many watts through your mining machine as humanly possible because you don't particularly care if your machine goes from 28 joules.  </p>
<p>01:13:56:16 - 01:14:23:02<br>Jamie<br>A tear has your efficiency to 36 joules. Tear ash, you don't really care because the input cost of that power is zero. And you know, in Texas we have 10% of the year that's negative pricing. We have zero in our pricing for electricity all the time. So these these 14 guys have made a minor that is very well fit for an electricity market like Texas that has a lot of zero pricing and has a lot of very high pricing, you can get paid a lot to curtail.  </p>
<p>01:14:24:02 - 01:14:35:13<br>Jamie<br>And so it has this is like the what the minor firmware of the future should look like. And by the way, firma is expensive. You pay 1 to 2% of your revenue for firmware. So it's a huge cost savings to buy from them.  </p>
<p>01:14:37:12 - 01:14:44:29<br>Marty<br>And how big of a splash they're going to make in the market Hack how many machines can they produce?  </p>
<p>01:14:44:29 - 01:14:48:15<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, I mean, it's starting an AC company is really tricky because.  </p>
<p>01:14:48:18 - 01:15:20:19<br>Marty<br>That's the thing I worry about most is extremely capital intensive, takes a long amount of time and that time, well, that's maybe we're hitting an inflection point with the time aspect is not as, uh, it's not as important as it was in the past where you have these large jumps from seven nanometer to five nanometer, three nanometer. We're literally reaching physical limits on these chips that you're likely not going to have the step function improvement in the leadership level that has existed in the past.  </p>
<p>01:15:20:19 - 01:15:34:07<br>Marty<br>So the concept of asset commodification has been talked a lot in the mining community over the last five years. If we're getting close to that point, maybe the barrier to entry for a new ac-dc manufacturers is a bit lower.  </p>
<p>01:15:35:04 - 01:16:05:29<br>Jamie<br>I do agree with that. I still think that there's really it's very hard. Yeah. Um, simply because from the perspective of an operator, we probably are picking the machine that we're going to run six months out from when we, when we run it or when we even buy it. Um, so you're thinking about what's the form factor of this machine?  </p>
<p>01:16:06:11 - 01:16:34:12<br>Jamie<br>Um, what's the availability of this machine from a pricing perspective, and is it, is it going to function the way that I believe, you know, there have been historically, even with Bitmain, the S17 had a failure rate bad epoxy, bad epoxy, the heatsinks were falling off. You had a massive failure rate on that. So there's even risk with with the existing manufacturers then what was that one that kind of looked like Mountain Dew.  </p>
<p>01:16:35:13 - 01:16:36:03<br>Marty<br>New miner.  </p>
<p>01:16:36:03 - 01:16:43:06<br>Jamie<br>Or something? Yeah, new miner that had a 50% failure rate and people who bought those.  </p>
<p>01:16:43:26 - 01:16:46:16<br>Marty<br>Were actually go back drag events. Yeah. Down the.  </p>
<p>01:16:46:16 - 01:17:17:28<br>Jamie<br>Line drag. So there's a huge risk in buying the first batch of ASICs from a brand new manufacturer and yeah, if you're designing for a particular basic it's you have to really commit to it. And so as a premise it should be traded at a discount to a bitmain or a micro team. You know, even MakerBot trades at a slight discount to bitmain still after and it's been around for five years.  </p>
<p>01:17:18:11 - 01:17:36:14<br>Jamie<br>And so if you're going to be a new A6 manufacturer, you probably need to price at a 25% discount to the market in order to compensate your customers for taking a risk on a new batch. And then that gets better and better and better as time goes on. But it's so it's one part asset commodification and reaching the state of the art in the chip industry.  </p>
<p>01:17:36:14 - 01:17:47:22<br>Jamie<br>And then that's the other part, consumer mindset and consumer psychology of taking that risk. So it's not a risk to be taken lightly. If you're a miner, you could literally lose your whole business.  </p>
<p>01:17:47:22 - 01:18:12:13<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Now that's the other thing, leaning into like Asia commodification and we've talked about this on Peter's podcast, but it's worth repeating, like even within Bitmain alone, like the PSA is like, right with the power supply units that literally you to plug your machine into a wall like they're not uniform across every model. Right? And that blows my mind.  </p>
<p>01:18:12:13 - 01:18:24:24<br>Marty<br>It's like, how have we not gotten to a point where it's like, you can get an order and expect a certain PSU, right? Even between like different model, different XP batches have different pieces.  </p>
<p>01:18:24:24 - 01:18:36:07<br>Jamie<br>Remember when they made one version of the J Pro like two inches longer than the previous one? Yeah. And it caught everyone off guard. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:18:36:09 - 01:18:38:22<br>Marty<br>Fucked up all their heat circulation, right?  </p>
<p>01:18:38:22 - 01:18:44:21<br>Jamie<br>I mean, if you're running immersion, two inches is a lot. Yeah, that's, you know, you design an immersion tank.  </p>
<p>01:18:45:27 - 01:18:47:20<br>Marty<br>Based off the form factor specs.  </p>
<p>01:18:47:20 - 01:18:57:09<br>Jamie<br>Exactly. Because you need to have uniform flow rate and flow distribution of the fluid through, all of the miners and so little changes to the form factor.  </p>
<p>01:18:57:12 - 01:18:58:16<br>Marty<br>Fuck up the physics.  </p>
<p>01:18:58:16 - 01:19:05:22<br>Jamie<br>It could totally screw up. It could screw up your entire cooling system. Yeah. If you're trying to be extremely efficient with fluid.  </p>
<p>01:19:05:22 - 01:19:12:11<br>Marty<br>We're so early like that, it's like because we were and you weren't where you were in Nashville. But no, we're.  </p>
<p>01:19:12:11 - 01:19:16:08<br>Jamie<br>You know, I didn't wear one we were talking to. I'll be there for a Bitcoin conference.  </p>
<p>01:19:16:08 - 01:19:35:25<br>Marty<br>So there was, um, at the Energy and Mining Summit Nashville last month. There was incumbent data center guys that are getting into Bitcoin mining that was like their one like piece of feedback was like, I can't believe that none of this is uniform yet. Like this is such slapstick.  </p>
<p>01:19:36:05 - 01:19:36:12<br>Jamie<br>Right.  </p>
<p>01:19:36:15 - 01:19:39:29<br>Marty<br>Activity. The fact that you guys put up with any of this is the same. Um.  </p>
<p>01:19:40:27 - 01:19:49:16<br>Jamie<br>I know it's, uh, bitcoin miners are just rabid risk on consumers. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:19:50:03 - 01:19:53:18<br>Marty<br>It is the wow. It's like digital wild getting. Yeah, to an extent.  </p>
<p>01:19:54:12 - 01:20:45:28<br>Jamie<br>Plus, you really don't have much recourse. You know, it's no, it's a Chinese vendor and they send you something. You got to plug it in no matter what. You've got it. You've got two a year and the first three months are critical in a rising difficulty environment. And it's yeah, I mean, an American manufacturer would be great. Yes, I could, I should talk to some folks about this and it, it almost got off the ground, but it didn't a cooperative an American based asec cooperative, where a couple of really good chip guys got together and started a nonprofit cooperative where you put a little bit in for the IP and and the tape out and  </p>
<p>01:20:45:28 - 01:21:14:07<br>Jamie<br>all of that just to get the process rolling. And then everybody got a machine at cost. So you just you bought the fab time, the foundry time, you got paid back in six and and you look what happened with the intel. I think it, it was a first iteration of that with a reputable chip manufacturer and that was that did not work out well for the firms who participate in that.  </p>
<p>01:21:14:19 - 01:21:40:28<br>Jamie<br>Now, history has been really unkind to people. Take incremental risk in Bitcoin mining, whether it's incremental financial risk, um, like us taking on USD debt, getting into anything upstream in manufacturing, the A6, trying a brand new ac-dc manufacturer, buying their equipment for the first time, control boards, even power supplies. You know.  </p>
<p>01:21:40:28 - 01:21:43:03<br>Marty<br>It's building your own data centers.  </p>
<p>01:21:43:29 - 01:22:06:02<br>Jamie<br>That risk I think you need to take I think you need to take the risk of building your own data centers. And I think you need to take the risk of getting as close to the wholesale market of electricity generation on power side as those risks are. You can control them really well. They do require investment, but you can control them much better.  </p>
<p>01:22:06:15 - 01:22:06:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:22:08:00 - 01:22:16:09<br>Jamie<br>Because think about it, if you rely on a third party equipment vendor for your data center infrastructure, that's also a risk.  </p>
<p>01:22:16:17 - 01:22:17:00<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>01:22:17:03 - 01:22:17:21<br>Jamie<br>As we know.  </p>
<p>01:22:18:02 - 01:22:41:19<br>Marty<br>They have to weigh the rest of the time because I go back to this name of the game, I think again, the whole industry has been going through this iterative process, and that's one thing that encourages me this cycle. It seems that the industry is getting smarter about when they purchased the basics and where they are in terms of infrastructure build out with those buys because you want to buy those 86, get them delivered and plug them in immediately.  </p>
<p>01:22:41:20 - 01:22:45:06<br>Marty<br>Immediately. Yeah. Which last cycle was not happening.  </p>
<p>01:22:46:09 - 01:22:48:28<br>Jamie<br>Right. And it's still happening today.  </p>
<p>01:22:49:01 - 01:22:57:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Rackspace is. Yeah. Scarcer Than bitcoin it seems right now. Is it. It was for a while. Right now I.  </p>
<p>01:22:58:03 - 01:22:59:11<br>Jamie<br>Am not in the market so I don't.  </p>
<p>01:22:59:11 - 01:23:01:07<br>Marty<br>Know. I think the market is responding but.  </p>
<p>01:23:01:16 - 01:23:02:20<br>Jamie<br>Yeah we don't have as.  </p>
<p>01:23:02:21 - 01:23:11:21<br>Marty<br>The time in 2122 where after the Chinese migration people like, yeah, we'll take your assets, we'll plug it in and how they got ship and know where to plug.  </p>
<p>01:23:11:21 - 01:23:26:04<br>Jamie<br>Them in. Yeah I know that. Yeah they the Ac-dc manufacturers were doing a lot of hosting deals, trying to get xrp's plugged in. We host one of the coolest things about our company, so we have no customers.  </p>
<p>01:23:27:08 - 01:23:29:00<br>Marty<br>It's a lot less stress.  </p>
<p>01:23:29:04 - 01:23:45:10<br>Jamie<br>My last business we had lot of customers and my two business partners in that company, they both love. They love that about this business. Technically, we do have a customer. It's an algorithm. It's our customers. They distributed.  </p>
<p>01:23:45:19 - 01:23:46:01<br>Marty<br>Hash car.  </p>
<p>01:23:46:02 - 01:23:51:19<br>Jamie<br>SHA256 Yeah, it's it's a distributed computer algorithm.  </p>
<p>01:23:52:00 - 01:23:56:16<br>Marty<br>That's technically that's customer of the Bitcoin network looking to transact or is it your customers?  </p>
<p>01:23:58:13 - 01:24:26:19<br>Jamie<br>They are, but also just the, the Bitcoin code. Yeah, that, that's where the vast majority of our revenue comes from is the distribution schedule of the original algorithm. Yeah. And then there are some incremental people doing God's work and paying me fees, uh, paying us fees. And yeah, I mean, I, you know, this is I'm the king of controversy on this topic because I like fees, but.  </p>
<p>01:24:26:25 - 01:24:27:10<br>Marty<br>I like fees.  </p>
<p>01:24:27:10 - 01:25:10:25<br>Jamie<br>So I, I'm very indiscriminate about fees. I want anybody who wants to pay me fees to be able to do so. One of the things I think is that's going to be the coolest development over the next ten years is if if we assume that fee markets are going to materialize and become, um, the majority of contribution to mining revenue versus the way they are now where the subsidy is, I mean, in this block era, I think averaged 1 to 20 subsidy versus fees, maybe maybe 1 to 17 when we have it's going to be 1 to 10.  </p>
<p>01:25:11:20 - 01:25:50:22<br>Jamie<br>Then we have in 2028, it's going to be 1 to 5. If fees continue to grow, you could see an entire block epic to be parity between fees and subsidy. In the end, you know, the 1.6 block reward error, 1.5 and change whatever it's going to be in 2028 to 2032. But what should happen or what I predict will happen that's going to be really interesting is the block times are going to be much slower during periods of peak demand that that phenomenon is going to accelerate like in the Texas summer block.  </p>
<p>01:25:50:22 - 01:26:13:14<br>Jamie<br>Times are much they they don't grow at as consistent over rate as they do during the non summer months in Texas. And you're actually going to see that more intraday where like let's say it'll be an afternoon period block times will start to slow as all the miners begin curtailing. That will have a reflexive effect where the fee market.  </p>
<p>01:26:14:03 - 01:26:14:20<br>Marty<br>Jumps up.  </p>
<p>01:26:14:23 - 01:26:34:22<br>Jamie<br>Starts to jump up, and then you'll see this inverse correlation between LNP's and fee markets, where the fees could rise up so much that it actually pushes the LNP of electricity to become attractive to mine. So all this hashrate will come online in response, the rising fee market. So you have this like crazy interplay between pay.  </p>
<p>01:26:34:22 - 01:26:37:16<br>Marty<br>You imagine over time sort of like this, but it'll eventually get to like this.  </p>
<p>01:26:38:11 - 01:26:51:18<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, it will eventually become very efficient. But it's I think you could start to see a long term trend where off peak electricity has materially faster times over a period of entire year than on peak electricity.  </p>
<p>01:26:51:18 - 01:27:02:22<br>Marty<br>What was once the, the BitMEX payout fee spike will turn into. Yeah. Energy price volatility and curtailment. Yeah. This sea spike.  </p>
<p>01:27:02:22 - 01:27:08:02<br>Jamie<br>Elegant intersection of fees and lamps.  </p>
<p>01:27:08:07 - 01:27:14:00<br>Marty<br>Yeah. For those who are unaware like BitMEX, they would do what every Monday morning at 9 a.m. they do payouts or something like that?  </p>
<p>01:27:14:00 - 01:27:15:13<br>Jamie<br>I believe that's correct.  </p>
<p>01:27:15:25 - 01:27:21:23<br>Marty<br>And you could visibly see it on the changes they got. Fees are up, right? Max is paying out all their users.  </p>
<p>01:27:22:21 - 01:27:34:25<br>Jamie<br>Yeah. Uh, I was thinking about that, uh, how far we've come since the that March 2020 BitMEX flash crash.  </p>
<p>01:27:35:07 - 01:27:35:25<br>Marty<br>What does happen?  </p>
<p>01:27:36:00 - 01:27:36:27<br>Jamie<br>Uh, yeah.  </p>
<p>01:27:37:12 - 01:27:38:13<br>Marty<br>Turn the engines off.  </p>
<p>01:27:39:19 - 01:28:10:01<br>Jamie<br>Crazy to think that that Arthur that Bitcoin almost a bitmex was the dominant exchange in terms of liquidity in March of 2020 and they only accepted Bitcoin as collateral and and blocks were full fees were through the roof. Bitcoin crashed over 50% in like a couple of hours overnight. It was trading eight, it was trading 8000 on whatever that period.  </p>
<p>01:28:10:25 - 01:28:24:21<br>Jamie<br>Yes, right around there it's trading 8000 and within a few hours it was trading 3300. And so nobody could get additional collateral into BitMEX because the blocks were so full and the fees were so high.  </p>
<p>01:28:24:22 - 01:28:25:24<br>Marty<br>Some of them were cheap out.  </p>
<p>01:28:26:00 - 01:28:48:09<br>Jamie<br>And all of the collateral that was on there, which was supporting Bitcoin long positions, like if you wanted to buy Bitcoin on BitMEX during that time, you could only post Bitcoin as margin collateral. So your margin collateral was was crashing in value. Nobody could get additional margin call margin collateral in there. So everyone was getting liquidated. Uh, and then Arthur just pulled the plug.  </p>
<p>01:28:49:25 - 01:28:51:27<br>Jamie<br>There was definitely a meeting after they were like, All right.  </p>
<p>01:28:51:27 - 01:28:52:24<br>Marty<br>Guys, as.  </p>
<p>01:28:53:04 - 01:28:54:12<br>Jamie<br>You were, you guys are done?  </p>
<p>01:28:55:04 - 01:28:55:25<br>Marty<br>Yeah Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:28:56:07 - 01:28:58:29<br>Jamie<br>You have to have a US dollar.  </p>
<p>01:28:59:13 - 01:29:12:04<br>Marty<br>I mean, I know people who are running funds that were said, yeah, trading X, right? And they didn't put a high enough fee on their transaction and cannot meet their, their collateral call.  </p>
<p>01:29:12:14 - 01:29:17:08<br>Jamie<br>That was probably the sickest the sickest buying opportunity in the hit in the history of Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:29:17:08 - 01:29:17:21<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>01:29:18:15 - 01:29:27:21<br>Jamie<br>In terms of what was going on in the backdrop from a macro economic perspective, money printing and all of that.  </p>
<p>01:29:28:02 - 01:29:29:12<br>Marty<br>Anything up to a having.  </p>
<p>01:29:29:22 - 01:29:37:04<br>Jamie<br>Into having you. Exactly into a having and you got an opportunity to buy bitcoin at 3500 bucks coin one.  </p>
<p>01:29:37:05 - 01:30:02:05<br>Marty<br>Was I was so Parker and I recorded a podcast with Kyle Bass from him capital literally 5 p.m. before all of this happened. And I think the last question, as Parker said, what's going to happen with Bitcoin? He was like, I don't know just make sure you have your coins in Self-custody Yeah, thank God for Santucci. Let's say about that.  </p>
<p>01:30:02:05 - 01:30:07:16<br>Marty<br>I was like smash buying trout that I was like, Oh shit, 5000, 3500. Like.  </p>
<p>01:30:08:08 - 01:30:13:14<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, I bought a bunch of too. Yeah, it was good. And then people got stimulus.  </p>
<p>01:30:13:23 - 01:30:14:02<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:30:14:09 - 01:30:17:10<br>Jamie<br>So everybody could roll their stimulus into Bitcoin. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:30:18:03 - 01:30:18:23<br>Marty<br>It's crazy time.  </p>
<p>01:30:19:14 - 01:30:32:15<br>Jamie<br>It was. And then a year later meme stock. Uh, with, uh, deep, deep fucking value value.  </p>
<p>01:30:33:05 - 01:30:36:14<br>Marty<br>AMC GameStop. Did you watch the money at.  </p>
<p>01:30:37:06 - 01:30:38:03<br>Jamie<br>No. Is that the.  </p>
<p>01:30:38:13 - 01:30:40:24<br>Marty<br>The movie on it? It's pretty good.  </p>
<p>01:30:41:12 - 01:30:52:26<br>Jamie<br>That was one of the funniest, most fun times of my life. I remember every day just getting up and just like seeing the moves in the markets and the memes flying around on Twitter.  </p>
<p>01:30:53:01 - 01:31:02:29<br>Marty<br>The the meme culture around that time, I think I don't want to say it peaked. Maybe we can get to that level again, but that is the last all time high. I mean, culture is around there.  </p>
<p>01:31:03:05 - 01:31:05:20<br>Jamie<br>I love I'm a big meme culture guy.  </p>
<p>01:31:05:23 - 01:31:08:13<br>Marty<br>Same. It's a it's good for the soul.  </p>
<p>01:31:08:28 - 01:31:09:14<br>Jamie<br>It is.  </p>
<p>01:31:09:21 - 01:31:22:25<br>Marty<br>And it's actually we laugh about it, but I do think it is one of the most potent tools we have to take away power from. These people probably do not deserve it. You need to ridicule these people. Memes are the most effective way ridiculing these people.  </p>
<p>01:31:23:06 - 01:31:39:17<br>Jamie<br>They definitely are. Yeah. And there's nothing that ridicules them more than cryptocurrencies. Based on memes of dogs speaking broken English that are worth tens of billions of dollars.  </p>
<p>01:31:40:18 - 01:31:42:12<br>Marty<br>This bank. Uh.  </p>
<p>01:31:43:01 - 01:31:54:19<br>Jamie<br>No, I don't think bank is worth ten. Doge is worth ten buck doge. Yeah. Yeah. I mean there's there's three dog coins that are worth more than $1,000,000,000.  </p>
<p>01:31:57:19 - 01:31:58:29<br>Marty<br>Bitcoin's worth more than a trillion.  </p>
<p>01:31:58:29 - 01:32:03:19<br>Jamie<br>Now Bitcoin is worth more than a trillion. And guess what? Even our little dog coins are.  </p>
<p>01:32:03:19 - 01:32:04:16<br>Marty<br>Worth more than a billion.  </p>
<p>01:32:04:16 - 01:32:05:25<br>Jamie<br>They're worth more than a billion.  </p>
<p>01:32:07:00 - 01:32:13:00<br>Marty<br>Where do you think this all goes? You optimistic? Cautiously optimistic. Everything. Bitcoin mining.  </p>
<p>01:32:13:18 - 01:32:15:23<br>Jamie<br>Yeah. I'm this. I'm so optimistic.  </p>
<p>01:32:16:06 - 01:32:16:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:32:17:01 - 01:32:17:22<br>Jamie<br>I'm blinded.  </p>
<p>01:32:18:06 - 01:32:44:07<br>Marty<br>I, I have this long running belief that's becoming more hardened by the day that are in order of operations to the success of Bitcoin in the front of the order operations lies in the hands of the mining industry, convincing the energy sector like I do this right, I become extremely more hardened in that belief and more optimistic as time goes on, even though there's still a disconnect and not everybody gets it.  </p>
<p>01:32:44:07 - 01:33:01:06<br>Marty<br>I think people like paving the way and others in the energy sector are beginning to have the lightbulb go off is creating the environment where it can really have this escape velocity. Terms of the acceptance of Bitcoin outside of this bubble that we've been in.  </p>
<p>01:33:02:05 - 01:33:11:22<br>Jamie<br>Definitely, yeah. I mean, so we launched our our flagship financial product last year, which is are our Bitcoin denominated bond.  </p>
<p>01:33:11:25 - 01:33:12:08<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>01:33:12:18 - 01:33:38:25<br>Jamie<br>And we raised just under a thousand Bitcoin. It was a rate D uh, five or six C offering, which is an an SEC registered offering for accredited investors only. The only way you can do lending products with retail is if they're callable and if you have a call. And that's how your, um, that's how you have an asset and liability duration mismatch like Celsius and blockfi had.  </p>
<p>01:33:39:06 - 01:33:57:23<br>Jamie<br>But so we launched this product the Bitcoin liked it a lot. We did it on pretty good terms. It was a venture debt. So you got a bunch of warrants in our company and you get a 10% yield on Bitcoin and you're at the top of our capital stack your first lien over all the assets of the company.  </p>
<p>01:33:58:09 - 01:34:27:07<br>Jamie<br>Um, and you know, the way to think about this is we're taking this Bitcoin, we're turning it into the machines that create Bitcoin and, and that, you know, it's a, it's a very secure form of commodity production finance. It's like borrowing barrels of oil to go and build an oil drilling site and to pay your, your leases and and get your drill rig all set up.  </p>
<p>01:34:27:17 - 01:34:55:10<br>Jamie<br>And so there's nothing like it in commodity production finance because obviously oil has is not transportable. There's tremendous storage costs. There's there's gravity differentials between different types of it's not a fungible commodity. Uh, and natural gas, same thing doesn't work. You could do it with gold. I'm surprised it never existed in gold, but you know, it is what it is.  </p>
<p>01:34:55:13 - 01:34:57:02<br>Marty<br>Because of pretty high storage costs.  </p>
<p>01:34:57:04 - 01:35:19:12<br>Jamie<br>See it? High storage costs, too. Absolutely. But Bitcoin is it's a monetary commodity. It's it's instantly transportable. It's fungible. Uh, you know, there's zero friction in it. And so it is this is a perfect method of commodity production, finance and where I'm going with this shell of my companies.  </p>
<p>01:35:19:25 - 01:35:23:05<br>Marty<br>Yes, I'm happy you brought it up, because that's what I want to end with. Is this.  </p>
<p>01:35:23:06 - 01:35:54:16<br>Jamie<br>Okay, good. But here's here's our kind of big thesis on it. And I tell these people and they so like, All right, cool, buddy is like we said before, Cormann has no customers. Our customer is distributed algorithm, distributed software platform, and occasionally it is individuals who want to pay fees. It's 5% individuals, one of individuals and firms paying fees, 95% a software algorithm.  </p>
<p>01:35:55:09 - 01:36:06:07<br>Jamie<br>That software algorithm is the single largest non-state buyer of electricity in the entire world and growing at at 15 gigawatts.  </p>
<p>01:36:06:16 - 01:36:08:07<br>Marty<br>Approaching 700 x slash.  </p>
<p>01:36:08:21 - 01:36:42:10<br>Jamie<br>999 95% uptime times 16 gigawatts. It's the single largest buyer and most consistent buyer of electricity in the entire world. Bitcoin denominated finance power plants together. If you're converting energy into Bitcoin's bitcoin should be the financing instrument for power plants. And you get those two things together. Now, admittedly, right now it's there's obvious reasons why this is not happening.  </p>
<p>01:36:43:07 - 01:37:08:00<br>Jamie<br>The having is one of them because a power plant amortization schedule, meaning you invest X in CapEx, expect to get your CapEx back in Y years. Y years is about ten years. And you're going to have, depending if you time the cycles perfectly, you're going to have to having during that ten year period, you might even have three if you screw it up, I think.  </p>
<p>01:37:08:12 - 01:37:34:09<br>Jamie<br>Uh, and so if you take a bunch of Bitcoin and use it to buy a power plant and then plug in miners and go through the whole cycle there, during that period, you're going to your Bitcoin denominated revenue is going to go down pretty, pretty materially per unit of hash rate during that time period. And so it becomes hard to align the amortization schedules of the power plant with the mining operation.  </p>
<p>01:37:35:04 - 01:38:06:11<br>Jamie<br>Dogecoin has no having. So it's actually you could probably find its power plant with Dogecoin Dogecoin's denominated debt for it stood show. But obviously the doge market cap is immaterial and it's a it's a significantly worse store value than bitcoin because it has perpetual issuance. There are no halvings. But what's really cool about bitcoin is that in that world where the fee pressure and the fees rise to be more than the subsidy, it mitigates the effect of the having successively.  </p>
<p>01:38:06:11 - 01:38:24:29<br>Jamie<br>And so I think my big prediction in the next decade is people will start to use a little bit of Bitcoin in their cap stack. You know, it would be crazy to not have a power plant, a Bitcoin mine, a little bit of Bitcoin denominated, a little bit of usdc equity, a little bit of USD debt, like that's what the right cap structure looks like.  </p>
<p>01:38:25:08 - 01:38:52:18<br>Jamie<br>Then you have an indiscriminate buyer of energy. You can sell that energy back to the grid anytime you want. If Bitcoin flies around and there's a bunch of volatility, your bitcoin denominated financing piece protects you from that and the revenues in a period where your bitcoin mining revenue goes down expressed in dollars per megawatt hour, your opportunity to optimize power and sell it back to the grid goes up.  </p>
<p>01:38:53:06 - 01:39:22:04<br>Jamie<br>The more that the Bitcoin breakeven goes lower and lower, the more that you would be curtailing your Bitcoin mining load and selling the power back to the grid. So the interaction of these markets where you have a flexible generation stack and a and a flexible Bitcoin mining stack that also has that fee pressure dynamic with block times getting slower, it is all of like it fits together so elegantly and I'm a big that's my big prediction.  </p>
<p>01:39:22:04 - 01:39:26:22<br>Jamie<br>That's my crazy prediction is Bitcoin denominated finance for power generation becomes the thing.  </p>
<p>01:39:26:22 - 01:39:27:27<br>Marty<br>I don't think it's that crazy.  </p>
<p>01:39:28:07 - 01:39:28:27<br>Jamie<br>Yeah I know.  </p>
<p>01:39:28:29 - 01:39:29:22<br>Marty<br>You're good idea.  </p>
<p>01:39:29:22 - 01:39:32:26<br>Jamie<br>You're on the the absolute fringe of.  </p>
<p>01:39:33:01 - 01:39:55:13<br>Marty<br>This is how we get to a type one civilization and you need these Yeah you need these types of and again going back to like the first order of operations in the energy sector being so important think that's the big question is like how do you go from like a dollar reserve system to a Bitcoin reserve system? And like this is part of that process where you basically team up, right?  </p>
<p>01:39:55:21 - 01:40:09:01<br>Marty<br>You have two of the most important tools that humanity, money and energy team up. And then from there you can disconnect from the dollar system and begin to have the Bitcoin standard materialize.  </p>
<p>01:40:09:08 - 01:40:57:13<br>Jamie<br>Here you have a little microgrid. Yeah. Where you have a little a community that's organized around a power plant, a bitcoin mine and and short range transmission infrastructure and you just how you have economically perfect consumption of energy, you have incentives for demand response there. I do think some of the cool things that are happening with residential demand response are are another interesting step in this direction because right now Texas has started to do this a little bit, but it's it's blown up a couple of times where residential consumers can could participate more directly in demand response and you know actively turn off their AC when power prices get high and it would reduce their  </p>
<p>01:40:57:13 - 01:41:29:14<br>Jamie<br>power bill dramatically. Um that but getting the largest consumer largest and most indiscriminate consumer of peak power the residential consumer to be more price sensitive also is a going to be an interesting restoration of free market like real price discriminate free market consumption because right now it's you know you just get your power pass through by your retail electric provider.  </p>
<p>01:41:29:26 - 01:41:53:01<br>Jamie<br>There's not a lot of sensitivity to when you've consumed. It's just a big blended rate that gets distributed out amongst everybody. And that's the reason why the average residential consumer in America pays 16.5%, 16.5 cents a kilowatt hour for power, and the wholesale market is 4 to $0.05, and they're overpaying by a factor of three for their power because there's no price sensitivity on that.  </p>
<p>01:41:53:19 - 01:41:57:22<br>Jamie<br>I think that's also a cool development that that plays really nicely with Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:41:59:20 - 01:42:00:19<br>Marty<br>In terms of.  </p>
<p>01:42:01:04 - 01:42:39:13<br>Jamie<br>In terms of the the way the let's say, the coincidence of supply, demand and price sensitivity all happening in electricity markets right now. Right now you have a lot of dumb electricity market participants, not dumb, but not sophisticated, not savvy. Now you have smart home technology and and that like a tech enabled digitally native power grid where the whole home can respond quickly.  </p>
<p>01:42:39:28 - 01:43:09:09<br>Jamie<br>You know, you're not like honey, you run out to the breaker in the garage and so, you know, open the breaker. It's like, no, the this all the systems are connected to a price feed. And the price feed is ingesting the real time wholesale market electricity cost. And if you are a person who doesn't want to pay a $400 power bill in the summer, you just say, you know, I'm willing to sweat a little bit from 4 to 6 p.m. and that's family sauna time now.  </p>
<p>01:43:09:12 - 01:43:25:06<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, we make we make a thing of it or we have a like a cold plunge or cold pool in the backyard and we have family pool time from 4 to 6 p.m.. Instead of ripping the APS, the AC at the absolute peak of transmission charges and electricity prices on the power grid.  </p>
<p>01:43:25:16 - 01:43:37:09<br>Marty<br>That makes sense. Yeah, that would help obviously service demand in other areas. I'm sure up bitcoin plays into this like the bitcoin miners less incentivized.  </p>
<p>01:43:37:10 - 01:44:13:06<br>Jamie<br>Because the bitcoin miners are already the the inverse of the residential consumer. Yeah. And so what it looks like is you have a power grid that's like it's a bit more reasonably sized. It actually works better with intermittent resource and battery. So in the world that the Inflation Reduction Act gets renewed again and then again and the government endlessly subsidizes the, the development of renewable resources and batteries and they insist that that's the direction that the species go, at least in North America, for our energy needs.  </p>
<p>01:44:13:19 - 01:44:40:26<br>Jamie<br>Then you start to have okay of Bitcoin mining, which is price sensitive, inverse of residential peak demand. You have residential demand response and participation there with a direct and sensitive, a direct incentive for price sensitive electricity. Consumers reduce during the peaks. And so the way it manifests is you don't have a 40,000 megawatt differential between steady state electricity demand on the grid and peak demand.  </p>
<p>01:44:40:26 - 01:44:45:09<br>Jamie<br>You have a much narrower thing and you have more perfect electricity markets. Is the way that that kind of.  </p>
<p>01:44:46:03 - 01:44:49:18<br>Marty<br>That's the goal. Yeah you're late to your call.  </p>
<p>01:44:50:06 - 01:44:51:01<br>Jamie<br>But I am I.  </p>
<p>01:44:51:07 - 01:44:54:17<br>Marty<br>Yeah but I think this is a good place to have No that's.  </p>
<p>01:44:54:17 - 01:44:54:24<br>Jamie<br>Okay.  </p>
<p>01:44:54:28 - 01:44:55:27<br>Marty<br>Very optimistic.  </p>
<p>01:44:56:03 - 01:44:56:24<br>Jamie<br>This is a great chat.  </p>
<p>01:44:57:06 - 01:45:09:01<br>Marty<br>It's always a great chat. I'm happy we're able to obviously record it with Peter, but on this show able to record it for those. Jimmy I go way back to New York. We were both we're both New York refugees living in Texas now.  </p>
<p>01:45:09:02 - 01:45:09:15<br>Jamie<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:45:10:14 - 01:45:12:01<br>Marty<br>Your hair was much shorter back then.  </p>
<p>01:45:12:08 - 01:45:12:18<br>Jamie<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:45:13:10 - 01:45:14:09<br>Marty<br>And you didn't have a beard.  </p>
<p>01:45:14:27 - 01:45:20:26<br>Jamie<br>I was envious of you. And when you moved to Texas all those years ago, I mean, save some for me.  </p>
<p>01:45:21:09 - 01:45:27:10<br>Marty<br>Oh, you came and got yours. You came and got yours. Janie, that is certainly clear. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:45:28:06 - 01:45:30:12<br>Jamie<br>Oh, yeah. Thank you very much for having me. Well.  </p>
<p>01:45:30:25 - 01:45:34:09<br>Marty<br>Thank you for coming around to do this much more. Also, you got to come to Austin more. I know you're West Texas.  </p>
<p>01:45:35:01 - 01:45:37:15<br>Jamie<br>I may actually be getting a place here.  </p>
<p>01:45:37:15 - 01:45:40:26<br>Marty<br>Yeah, get a place here. Yeah, I'm hang out here because I think.  </p>
<p>01:45:42:02 - 01:45:43:19<br>Jamie<br>The way West Texas is great.  </p>
<p>01:45:43:19 - 01:45:45:10<br>Marty<br>Though. That doesn't sound that great.  </p>
<p>01:45:45:13 - 01:46:00:15<br>Jamie<br>I mean, isolation has its benefits. That's true. It's a big, wide open landscape. There's a lot of liberty now here. It feels like there's a lot more rules here than in West Texas.  </p>
<p>01:46:01:17 - 01:46:04:18<br>Marty<br>Yes, a lot less rules compared to New York City, though.  </p>
<p>01:46:04:27 - 01:46:05:16<br>Jamie<br>That is true.  </p>
<p>01:46:05:17 - 01:46:06:19<br>Marty<br>Which is the tradeoff that I'm.  </p>
<p>01:46:06:19 - 01:46:17:13<br>Jamie<br>Willing to make. Fair enough. Good trade. Good trade. But West Texas is some real freedom out there. Yeah, let's agree to do this. Maybe you'll come west a little bit more often and I'll come east for more.  </p>
<p>01:46:17:13 - 01:46:19:23<br>Marty<br>We can make that agreement. I need to get up. Done.  </p>
<p>01:46:19:23 - 01:46:21:11<br>Jamie<br>Sox's done deal. That's a deal.  </p>
<p>01:46:21:22 - 01:46:24:13<br>Marty<br>That's a deal. We're going to have another deal. Peace and love for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[Scrib]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/bitcoin-power-markets-james-mcavity/">Read original post</a></p>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<p>This TFTC episode dives deep into the intersection of Bitcoin, energy markets, and the financial mechanisms that tie them together. Marty and his guest Jamie McAvity, Founder and CEO of Cornmint, explore the rapid growth and evolution of Bitcoin mining, the technical and economic hurdles for older individuals engaging with Bitcoin, and the importance of self-custody. They also touch upon the impact of Chinese miners on the American grid and mining industry, highlighting the technical, legal, and operational aspects involved.</p>
<p>The discussion shifts to the dynamics of the Texas electricity market, illustrating the complexities of power purchase agreements, demand response programs, and the role of Bitcoin miners as price-responsive, base-load consumers. Jamie provides an in-depth analysis of the energy market distortions caused by subsidies for renewable energy, drawing parallels with the situation in Germany and emphasizing the potential benefits of nuclear power. The conversation also speculates on the future interplay between Bitcoin's price, mining difficulty, and the block reward halving's effect on the industry.</p>
<p>Lastly, Jamie introduces the concept of Bitcoin-denominated finance for power generation, suggesting that aligning the economic incentives of energy producers and Bitcoin miners could lead to more efficient and resilient energy markets. This idea presents a vision for a future where Bitcoin not only acts as a bridge between the energy sector and finance but also drives a more sophisticated and responsive energy grid.</p>
<h3>Links</h3>
<p>Follow Jamie on <a href="https://twitter.com/jamesmcavity?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<h3>Sponsors</h3>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://app.zaprite.com/?utm_source=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/zaprite-tftc-40off-600x150@2x.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/Find-Talent-2400x1350.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h3>Best Quotes</h3>
<ol>
<li>"Bitcoiners underestimate is the technical hurdle of not so much learning bitcoin and setting up a bitcoin wallet. But the fear that an older person thinks with regard to anything about a computer." - Discussing the challenges older generations face when adopting Bitcoin.</li>
<li>"It's like that meme where the dude drags all his files to the trash can and his computer just evaporates in front of him." - Jamie humorously illustrates the fear older individuals have with technology.</li>
<li>"We might hit 50k during this episode... We are over a trillion-dollar market cap, officially, which is exciting." - The excitement over Bitcoin's surging price and market cap during the recording.</li>
<li>"I think that one thing that bitcoiners underestimate is the passive allocation machine of American public markets." - Jamie on how the financial industry is driving Bitcoin adoption.</li>
<li>"The single largest non-state buyer of electricity in the entire world is a software algorithm – the Bitcoin network." - Jamie explaining the significance of Bitcoin in the global energy market.</li>
<li>"Bitcoin denominated finance for power generation becomes a thing? I don't think it's that crazy." - Jamie's optimistic prediction for the future of energy financing through Bitcoin.</li>
</ol>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>This TFTC rip offers a rich and nuanced discussion on Bitcoin's growing role in the energy sector and the broader financial landscape. It paints a picture of an industry at the cusp of transformative change, driven by technological innovation, market dynamics, and the pioneering spirit of Bitcoiners. Jamie's insights provide a compelling argument for the convergence of Bitcoin mining and energy production, suggesting a future where these two critical industries support and enhance each other, leading to more efficient markets and a move towards a more decentralized and resilient energy grid. The episode leaves listeners with a sense of cautious optimism about Bitcoin's potential to reshape not just finance, but also our approach to energy consumption and production.</p>
<h3>Timestamps</h3>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>7:38 - 50k and Ready Player One<br>13:16 - Assertions of Chinese grid attack<br>23:06 - Working with the wind tax credit issue<br>36:44 - Renewable grid drawbacks and risks<br>44:17 - The right mix of energy sources<br>47:53 - Germany decommissioning and energy politics<br>1:00:23 - Bitcoiners running nuclear<br>1:06:11 - Halving<br>1:11:52 - ASIC innovation<br>1:31:04 - Mining fees<br>1:34:28 - BitMEX<br>1:38:07 - Gamestop<br>1:40:41 - Cormint<br>1:47:01 - Energy/finance integration<br>1:52:25 - Wrapping up</p>
<p>00:00:01:12 - 00:00:03:17<br>Marty<br>Like, check. One, two, one, two. Jamie we're live.  </p>
<p>00:00:03:17 - 00:00:04:16<br>Jamie<br>Microphone check.  </p>
<p>00:00:06:05 - 00:00:08:04<br>Marty<br>Jamie conversing with our Jamie Logan.  </p>
<p>00:00:09:09 - 00:00:13:19<br>Jamie<br>Great. Great to be here. Thank you for having me.  </p>
<p>00:00:13:21 - 00:00:14:24<br>Marty<br>It's a long time coming.  </p>
<p>00:00:15:18 - 00:00:23:19<br>Jamie<br>It is a long time. I've been wondering and I've been wondering when am I going to get on the show? But we had a good riff on the Peter McCormack Show.  </p>
<p>00:00:23:24 - 00:00:29:21<br>Marty<br>That was a great conversation. I was with Thomas over the weekend. Yeah, we were reminiscing on that conversation was great. Free flowing.  </p>
<p>00:00:30:11 - 00:00:31:22<br>Jamie<br>God bless Pupkin.  </p>
<p>00:00:32:13 - 00:00:39:12<br>Marty<br>God bless public. God bless America. God bless bitcoin. You might had 50 k during this episode, during this recording.  </p>
<p>00:00:39:25 - 00:00:47:09<br>Jamie<br>Yeah. Well, we've we are over $1,000,000,000,000 market cap officially which is exciting.  </p>
<p>00:00:47:22 - 00:00:48:11<br>Marty<br>One t.  </p>
<p>00:00:48:29 - 00:00:54:07<br>Jamie<br>One t deleting zero as they say or adding adding adding a zero adding zero.  </p>
<p>00:00:54:11 - 00:00:54:26<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:00:55:09 - 00:00:55:20<br>Jamie<br>Right.  </p>
<p>00:00:55:29 - 00:00:58:00<br>Marty<br>It's pretty crazy. It's happening rather quickly.  </p>
<p>00:00:58:15 - 00:01:09:18<br>Jamie<br>It is. Yeah. The I think maybe we we all may have underestimated the the passive allocation machine of American public markets.  </p>
<p>00:01:10:21 - 00:01:11:29<br>Marty<br>Did you underestimate it yourself?  </p>
<p>00:01:13:03 - 00:01:57:15<br>Jamie<br>I did not. I did not. I, I deal with I have a lot of older friends, and I think that one thing that Bitcoiners underestimate is the technical hurdle of not so much learning Bitcoin and and setting up a bitcoin wallet. But the fear of that an older person thinks with regard to anything about a computer. I mean, how many how many kids, you know, friends that have to help their parents with their email every time they come home, you know, or get asked to solve a remedial or computer issue.  </p>
<p>00:01:57:15 - 00:02:11:11<br>Jamie<br>And the one characteristic of it is the on the uncertainty that they have around what happens if I click this button? There's like this fear that if I click this button, my whole emails, I get this.  </p>
<p>00:02:11:15 - 00:02:17:05<br>Marty<br>It's like that meme where the dude drags off his files to the trashcan and his computer just evaporates in front of him.  </p>
<p>00:02:18:22 - 00:02:22:15<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, Yeah, exactly. That's a real technical hurdle.  </p>
<p>00:02:22:15 - 00:02:37:04<br>Marty<br>And how many how many of these elder of our elders do you know that when you go to help them with their email, they have their password on a Post-it note Right on there. Right. Right on their screen? Yes. Think of Bitcoin. It's like, Oh, yeah, here's my private key. It's right.  </p>
<p>00:02:37:04 - 00:02:42:16<br>Jamie<br>Here. Like the villain Nolan Sorento in Ready Player one.  </p>
<p>00:02:42:24 - 00:02:45:01<br>Marty<br>I watched that Thursday night.  </p>
<p>00:02:45:10 - 00:02:52:15<br>Jamie<br>And his password is Boss Man 69, and it's written on a Post-it note right next to the.  </p>
<p>00:02:53:00 - 00:02:56:27<br>Marty<br>I didn't get through the whole the whole movie, but I watched, like, the first half before falling asleep.  </p>
<p>00:02:57:10 - 00:03:02:24<br>Jamie<br>Oh, yeah. You probably missed the the part I'm referencing where they, they hack his.  </p>
<p>00:03:02:25 - 00:03:04:24<br>Marty<br>I seen it before I was rewatching it. Okay.  </p>
<p>00:03:05:08 - 00:03:06:24<br>Jamie<br>I've seen it like 25 times. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:03:07:10 - 00:03:11:05<br>Marty<br>It's very Bitcoin esque. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:03:11:21 - 00:03:40:25<br>Jamie<br>Prescient. There's a, a scene when they're doing an opening montage describing the success of this VR platform and there's a there's a currency, a digitally native currency within the world. And that I forget what the news clip says, but it's some kind of milestone that the the market capitalization of the in-game currency has exceeded a, you know, create crazy value.  </p>
<p>00:03:41:04 - 00:03:41:10<br>Jamie<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:03:41:20 - 00:03:50:16<br>Marty<br>Yeah yeah. The the winnings for that a tournament and ready player one if you get all the keys. Trillion dollars in stock.  </p>
<p>00:03:50:19 - 00:03:52:09<br>Jamie<br>Yeah half a half trillion.  </p>
<p>00:03:52:20 - 00:03:53:11<br>Marty<br>Half a trillion.  </p>
<p>00:03:53:12 - 00:04:06:18<br>Jamie<br>Yeah. Because he says I've seen it a lot. He says a half a million and a half a trillion dollars. Yeah. Which it's 20, 35. That's way low.  </p>
<p>00:04:07:28 - 00:04:09:14<br>Marty<br>Considering all the inflation that we're going to.  </p>
<p>00:04:10:00 - 00:04:26:22<br>Jamie<br>Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it's going to be like $50 trillion if it were realistic. Yeah, but the movie is based on a book that I think is 15 years old before MTG growth really, really started accelerating and compounding.  </p>
<p>00:04:26:25 - 00:04:34:18<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Do you think that's why the price is popping right now? Because people are looking out at the world and they go, they're going to the shit ton more money, or is it simply flows?  </p>
<p>00:04:35:22 - 00:04:58:11<br>Jamie<br>I think it's flows. I think that China I've been hearing a lot about the China situation. Uh, you know, the Chinese stock market is cratering. They're so indebted and their economy is stalling. Uh, and so the, the China print is coming. It's big. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:04:58:24 - 00:05:07:17<br>Marty<br>And people are successfully escaping yuan and Chinese stock markets in the Bitcoin despite the fact that China does not like Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:05:07:26 - 00:05:34:28<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, there's, uh, probably a lot of that is flowing through the Texas electricity market through hosting contracts. I think that is a loophole that works is if you buy an asset in China, send it anywhere else and run it and then pay a services contract in renminbi, you know, you're effectively circumventing the capital control.  </p>
<p>00:05:35:11 - 00:05:35:22<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:05:36:06 - 00:05:38:10<br>Jamie<br>And acquiring Bitcoin and acquiring Bitcoin. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:05:38:12 - 00:06:02:17<br>Marty<br>On the back end, let's talk about this because it's a big, big theme in the space right now. I think everybody in the mining industry knows there's a bunch of Chinese that are either hosting with American companies or mining themselves. The media is beginning to portray this as a systemic risk to the American economy potentially, but more specifically the American grid system.  </p>
<p>00:06:02:17 - 00:06:04:06<br>Marty<br>Ah, the Chinese attacking our grids.  </p>
<p>00:06:04:27 - 00:06:37:27<br>Jamie<br>That media, you know, they are just they have such a wonderful imagination, aren't they? Yeah, it's there's no there's no grid attack. I mean, we know some of these firms personally. We know their leadership, their leadership is American. They're extremely sensitive to political risk. They're just they're terrified. These are people who were were or are citizens of China under that quasi authoritarian regime.  </p>
<p>00:06:38:14 - 00:07:17:05<br>Jamie<br>They're very inherently scared and skeptical of government. And so they are doing everything they can to be compliant. The one thing I would say that is the most interesting and probably the least enduring component of this phenomenon with with Chinese owned A-6 being operated at American operated facilities, just for starters, the high voltage infrastructure that's connected to the power grid is owned and operated by an American firm.  </p>
<p>00:07:17:26 - 00:07:45:22<br>Jamie<br>And then you are prohibited under Texas law to own and operate high voltage infrastructure in a Chinese controlled entity. So that's it's called the Lonestar Infrastructure Act. So that on its face is illegal for anything like that. So there's no Chinese nationals who have the ability to destroy the power grid. They also would would not want to because that's their Bitcoin printing capital control circumventing machine.  </p>
<p>00:07:47:25 - 00:08:24:17<br>Jamie<br>The one thing that's strange about their behavior is they do not perform economic curtailment as a profit. Maximizing miner like like other equipment. Clients are bitcoin mining company. We are a profit maximizing entity. We are never attempting to consume electricity that exceeds the dollar per megawatt hour equivalent of our bitcoin mine for any period. And so last year, just by the numbers, we're running 30 ish joules per hour hash fleet.  </p>
<p>00:08:26:12 - 00:08:56:17<br>Jamie<br>That meant that in the west zone of ERCOT, we were online 90% of the year and we were offline 10% of the year. And it's not exactly perfect because we are avoided some of the coincident, the four coincident peaks to reduce transmission costs. So it wasn't always economically perfect, but it's a rough estimate of how many hours of the year, 90% of the hours of the year you could profitably convert electricity in the Texas wholesale market into Bitcoin 10% of the hours of the year.  </p>
<p>00:08:56:17 - 00:09:26:14<br>Jamie<br>You couldn't. The peer group of other miners within Texas is not economic actually perfect. They are willing to overpay for power just to convert that into Bitcoin, which is really kind of a unique market dynamic. It is. It is not an economically rational market because the desire to circumvent capital controls and save in Bitcoin creates a premium, a slight premium on power.  </p>
<p>00:09:27:18 - 00:09:34:29<br>Jamie<br>I do think it's going to go away because it doesn't make any sense. But yeah, that's one kind of interesting phenomenon.  </p>
<p>00:09:35:12 - 00:09:51:18<br>Marty<br>So why would does it have to do with the capital controls? The reason for them doing this? Because they're afraid that if they were to sell that electricity for dollars and then have to convert it to Bitcoin and run into some problems trying to convert that.  </p>
<p>00:09:51:18 - 00:10:27:23<br>Jamie<br>I think it comes from a bunch of potential factors. You know, the default hosting agreement template is a 95% uptime agreement. And so, um, there's some economic imperfection in that. That means that the the miner who is hosted is, is paying more for electricity than they should and and the host is leaving money on the table. You know what in our view looks like a perfect hosting agreement is one that is constantly optimizing between the two and sharing the revenue between the host and the miner.  </p>
<p>00:10:27:23 - 00:11:00:16<br>Jamie<br>You know, there's not much the Chinese guys who are sort of watching loads in the West, real time settlement in ERCOT, but their host is. And if the contract restructured in such a way that the host would optimize between the two and always just settle the difference in Bitcoin, then that would be the economically perfect outcome, but that the industry has not progressed to having a creative profit maximizing hosting agreement and it does add some complexity.  </p>
<p>00:11:00:16 - 00:11:19:05<br>Jamie<br>It adds some trust. There's some fidelity on doing settlement reconciliation for an ERCOT bill, which is is an additional incremental overhead for the accounting departments. So I, I'm confident it's going to change, but the current state of it is not optimized.  </p>
<p>00:11:20:01 - 00:11:56:29<br>Marty<br>But it's become more optimized. Over the last five years, it seems like there's been this progression of miners making mistakes around the power purchase agreements, learning from those mistakes, getting better. PPA is now with ERCOT and miners becoming more immersed within the man response programs we've had a bit of trial and error over the last three years specifically with that and people are getting smarter and it seems like slowly but surely over time the industry is going through this iterative process of figuring out what is the ideal situation from locking down the power to setting up the hosting agreement to then doing that profit share on top of that.  </p>
<p>00:11:57:07 - 00:12:09:29<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, definitely. And there's been attrition of less efficient operators and we had a major Texas operator compute North.  </p>
<p>00:12:11:29 - 00:12:12:27<br>Marty<br>Just talking about them.  </p>
<p>00:12:13:13 - 00:12:58:19<br>Jamie<br>Lose their business to their lender and it was being operated by U.S. BTC for a while, who bought it, who partnered with the lender I think to attempt to recover some of the assets. And now that portfolio has transitioned to marathon. So Marathon acquired the compute North built assets. Celsius is another one Celsius. Actually, I am good friends with the guy who was running the Celsius fleet and they were actually good from an energy management perspective, but they had a critical flaw in their capital market structure, obviously.  </p>
<p>00:12:58:29 - 00:13:01:20<br>Marty<br>And the business model, the other part of their business wasn't.  </p>
<p>00:13:02:14 - 00:13:42:09<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, I mean, that's what I mean. You know, they were running an ongoing fraud and had an asset and liability duration mismatch. So they, um, yeah, not necessarily an inefficient operator from the mining perspective, but a fraud. Yeah. So it's, it's getting better. It's getting better. And I just I tweeted yesterday, you know, that the addition of a base load consumer to that is never contributing to peak demand periods on the grid is literally the ideal consumer that you can add for the health of a power market.  </p>
<p>00:13:42:09 - 00:14:32:00<br>Jamie<br>In a power grid, there's no better consumer. It's the inverse of a retail consumer, which around the steady state most of the year, the ERCOT power grid demands between 40 and 50,000 megawatts of power. And last summer, record hot summer peak demand was 83,000 megawatts plus or minus a little bit. So you're talking about a2x response from the generation fleet on the grid to be able to serve those customers and the more bitcoin mining base load that is building coming online here, the stronger a signal it sends to the generation community to invest here and commit to power generation resources.  </p>
<p>00:14:32:16 - 00:14:54:27<br>Jamie<br>And then that Bitcoin mine load is completely gone during the peak. So you get this great signal to the generator community, Hey, come and build a power plant here. Uh, build your solar farms, build your wind farms, builds your natural gas plants, and then that demand is there 90% of the year. If it's economically perfect and it's gone, the 10% of the year when the residential community needs it.  </p>
<p>00:14:55:14 - 00:15:16:13<br>Marty<br>Do you see a scenario where we build generation capacity to, let's say, like 100 gigawatts, like far beyond whatever peak demand would be in the middle of summer or middle winter, If we get bad winter storms here and Bitcoin miners just soak up the excess capacity in perpetuity. That is maybe my naive brain. That's like what I think should happen.  </p>
<p>00:15:16:15 - 00:15:35:06<br>Jamie<br>No, I think you're thinking about it from like a very first principles. It may be a naive analysis, but it's first principles and it's correct. It is absolutely correct that especially with the market distorting price signal of the renewable energy production tax credit.  </p>
<p>00:15:35:06 - 00:15:36:22<br>Marty<br>I wrote about this over the weekend, you.  </p>
<p>00:15:36:22 - 00:16:09:00<br>Jamie<br>Know, it's just like you can underwrite. So a wind farm. Here's an example. A wind farm has a capacity factor of about 30 to 35% of its nameplate output per year. What that means is you build a one megawatt wind turbine, you will get 35% of the year of wind. That is sufficient to create generation for that. So there's 8760 hours in a year.  </p>
<p>00:16:09:10 - 00:16:36:19<br>Jamie<br>You get about a third of that. So call it a little less than 3000 megawatts per year. 3000 megawatt hours per year of generation will come from that wind farm. That one megawatt wind turbine costs $1 million to build a rough, rough estimate. The production tax credit will give you around $30 a megawatt hour for every megawatt hour that you generate.  </p>
<p>00:16:36:29 - 00:17:02:20<br>Jamie<br>So that's 3000 megawatt. And the production tax credit last ten years when you build. So it's 3000 megawatt hours per year times ten years, 30,000 megawatt hours times $30 a megawatt hour In production tax credit, it's $1,000,000. Exactly. So you could literally make $0 from selling energy and you will pay for.  </p>
<p>00:17:02:28 - 00:17:03:07<br>Marty<br>About.  </p>
<p>00:17:03:07 - 00:17:36:28<br>Jamie<br>Even the wind turbine. Yeah. And that is what is happening. This is why we have 10% of the year. There's negative negatively priced power in ERCOT and even though wind farms are not generating any revenue from selling energy, they're still building them because the federal government is effectively subsidizing this power. I mean, Corman's Bitcoin mine is a decommissioned wind farm that decommissioned in its 12th year of operation because once the production tax credits ended, they were never making money.  </p>
<p>00:17:36:28 - 00:17:40:24<br>Jamie<br>So they had no no use for they were losing money.  </p>
<p>00:17:41:10 - 00:17:56:10<br>Marty<br>And I want to dive deeper into this topic before we do that. Like why was Corman positioned to come take this asset and make a profitable? What do you do that makes us now profitable?  </p>
<p>00:17:56:18 - 00:18:26:04<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, well I mean it's we're effectively the inverse of the market distorted price signal from renewable energy. We are there to consume power when there is no demand from the grid and then we are shutting off. All right. Our behavior is as close to economic perfect, economically perfect as possible. And that's the business is attempting to be as economically perfect in consumption of power as we can be.  </p>
<p>00:18:26:11 - 00:18:59:28<br>Jamie<br>And the big barrier to entry for a mining startup, if at least if you want to play on grid and and wholesale, I mean, you know you know, off grid better than anybody. So you know, the constraints there are generator finance and all of that stuff for on grid it's a substation and interconnection and the interconnection queue in Texas is 2 to 4 years depending on where you're trying to go online and long lead time items on a high voltage grid.  </p>
<p>00:18:59:28 - 00:19:38:06<br>Jamie<br>Interconnected substation are one year at best, four years at worse. And you're talking about making somewhere between five and $20 million of CapEx before you even mine a Bitcoin. So you're waiting 1 to 4 years and making 5 to $20 million of CapEx to be able to mine Bitcoin. It's extremely if you're a startup company that's and most investors who invest in a Bitcoin mining startup, they would like to participate in the price appreciation of Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:19:38:06 - 00:20:11:25<br>Jamie<br>And if you do not deliver that, they get they're not pleased with you as a fiduciary of their capital. So you've got to convince someone to give you enough equity at a valuation that still makes sense for you or to give you an infrastructure loan to go and build a substation to make that happen. We were in in that phase of our business, we began our operations in upstate New York and we concluded not a great place to be and to do anything related to Bitcoin, much less be a Bitcoin miner.  </p>
<p>00:20:12:20 - 00:20:50:19<br>Jamie<br>And we did a nationwide search of the best place to do it. We identified West Texas, and then we found a wind farm owner who was very motivated to sell their assets because they were actively losing money on it. And we proved that we could develop the infrastructure to do this. And we had a team who who was going to figure out ways to innovate in this industry, and we convince them to sell us their substation and transmission line from their wind farm as an equity round in our business.  </p>
<p>00:20:50:29 - 00:21:02:07<br>Jamie<br>So we actually took a substation and a transmission line in-kind as an equity contribution to the company, and that was a game changer. I mean, that was that the reason why we exist today?  </p>
<p>00:21:02:19 - 00:21:05:11<br>Marty<br>And that's a very creative way of doing a deal.  </p>
<p>00:21:05:24 - 00:21:42:03<br>Jamie<br>Right? Creative. We had to convince people and and the deal had so much hair on it that it was there was virtually no other use for it. We had to renegotiate three ground leases. It joint ownership of the transmission line, a an electricity supply agreement with the utility and a cooperative transmission studies with ERCOT. We basically had to do six or seven transactions successfully in order to do this so that the previous owner realized how daunting it was for someone to buy this asset and how much hair there was on the deal.  </p>
<p>00:21:42:13 - 00:22:09:14<br>Jamie<br>And we were able to negotiate favorable terms that were effectively like, Look, this is going to be really hard to do and we'll pay you some money for just the option to let us try. So we paid them $1,000,000 at the close of the deal. And then upon the successful completion of these six or seven agreements, the transaction became structured as a little bit more in cash and mostly equity in the company.  </p>
<p>00:22:09:14 - 00:22:29:22<br>Jamie<br>So there the second largest investor in our company, and I believe that we will deliver them a great return over the long run on this wind farm that was effectively junk. And they turn they have a chance to turn trash into treasure through this company.  </p>
<p>00:22:29:28 - 00:22:56:25<br>Marty<br>Well, that's why it's creative in two ways. Number one, just the pure structuring of the deal. Basically acquire these assets in a smart way, in a capital efficient way that allows you to operate very profitably and get a payback on your initial investment quicker than you otherwise would have. And and to now that they're the second largest equity holder in your company, you have to imagine I imagine you probably know you definitely know better than I do.  </p>
<p>00:22:56:25 - 00:23:11:15<br>Marty<br>But if they're building wind farms, you understand the economic issues that these type of projects have now that they're investor and seeing what you guys are doing, I'm like, Oh shit, this is a solution to this massive problem that exists. Is that happening?  </p>
<p>00:23:12:23 - 00:24:03:13<br>Jamie<br>It's happening. It's happening gradually and across the spectrum of large institutional power market firms. You've got a huge range of Bitcoin acceptance and Bitcoin bullishness and orange Pilling. I'm surprised at how low it seems to be to me now, especially because bitcoin mining loads can really add a lot of value to generation fleets. One of the biggest problems in generation fleets is the forward power market in ERCOT right now is trading about $55 a megawatt hour for the next year.  </p>
<p>00:24:04:07 - 00:24:32:15<br>Jamie<br>It goes down a little bit. The further that you go out and gas is natural gas is very cheap. Natural gas, power plant power plants have a healthy operating margin. If they can secure a long term gas supply that's cheap and run it through a natural gas plant. Obviously wind and solar have no input fuel. So it's it's even a stronger value prop for them because they have no sensitivity to a fuel input cost.  </p>
<p>00:24:34:04 - 00:25:08:17<br>Jamie<br>The big boogeyman in the power market is that the volatility distribution of power prices in ERCOT is so large right now and it's growing because you have if you're a generator in this grid, you're absorbing power prices that go down to -24. The chance to get power prices that go up to positive 5000 per megawatt hour. And if you are a gas plant and you say, okay, I'm going to hedge a year of power because sure, it's going to be -20, it's going to be 5000.  </p>
<p>00:25:08:21 - 00:25:33:27<br>Jamie<br>I just want to lock that in and sell for $55. You it's very hard for you to structure what's called a unit contingent hedge, which means as long as my power plant is operating normally and it doesn't have a catastrophic maintenance issue, then you buyer of this offtake agreement from me, you will get your power. But if something happens to my plant, you're not going to get your power.  </p>
<p>00:25:36:05 - 00:25:58:29<br>Jamie<br>From what I understand, the buyers are more and more reluctant to do unit contingent deals. Deals that only deliver the power when the power plant is is operational and what that looks like basically is if something happens with the power plant during the summer when it's the hottest, you're more likely to have maintenance issues when you're running your plant really hard and it's very, very hot.  </p>
<p>00:26:01:04 - 00:26:42:08<br>Jamie<br>If you sell that hedge and your power plant goes offline, you're short power, your short power to the market and that opens you up to catastrophic risk as a company. If you put a Bitcoin mining load there, even with crappy equipment and you can put s19, there are signs there and then you have you don't need to hedge because you're you're selling electricity to the Bitcoin protocol at, you know, let's say the worst machines on the market is the M 30 S it makes about $85 megawatt hour.  </p>
<p>00:26:42:16 - 00:27:02:17<br>Jamie<br>The best machine is yes, 21 You're making close just under $200 a megawatt hour. You've got a PPA with the Bitcoin network. It's a variable price PPA and it's volatile, but you've got to PPA with the bitcoin network and you have a computing fleet that can power down 95% of its load in 3 seconds in response to prices.  </p>
<p>00:27:02:17 - 00:27:26:07<br>Jamie<br>So you would be able to keep your generation fleet running if your generator goes down, you just optimize the bitcoin load against the real time market. You already have that behavior there, but you then are gaining a call option where if your generation fleet is running and power prices go up, then you can deliver that power back to the grid and make make a lot of money there.  </p>
<p>00:27:26:21 - 00:28:12:20<br>Jamie<br>And so this is a it's a very appealing proposition from the perspective of a of a power market operator, power generation operation fleet. It's just that they're they're not there. I think that some of the bankruptcies, especially some of the early movers, the more open minded Bitcoin believers in the power industry, they invested in some of these firms that had very bad outcomes in 2022 and that scared and scared people off because there's just a ton of career risk for the junior guy at X, Y, Z, Energy Co who's I, We're going to go Bitcoin, we're going to do this or do A series B and we're going to sell a PPA to these guys  </p>
<p>00:28:12:20 - 00:28:21:29<br>Jamie<br>and this optimization deal. And next thing you know, you're in a bankruptcy court for two years and you're CEO and your legal team are like, This guy's a joker. And yeah, that's.  </p>
<p>00:28:22:23 - 00:28:23:22<br>Marty<br>We're not touching this.  </p>
<p>00:28:24:10 - 00:28:48:28<br>Jamie<br>We're not touching this. It's going to have to be built bottom up. It's going to have to be built by, in my opinion, by Bitcoin firms who already have Bitcoin risk, like we're wearing Bitcoin risk every single place in our business. There's no incremental risk to us to go into power generation other than the operating risks of the power generation, which are numerous and could easily destroy our company.  </p>
<p>00:28:48:28 - 00:28:50:24<br>Marty<br>At that point. And for a penny in for a pound.  </p>
<p>00:28:50:26 - 00:29:05:22<br>Jamie<br>That's right. There's well, we're not adding an incremental, uh, existential risk or career risk. It's already risk that we're wearing and we know we're going to consume power. And that's the most consistent part of our businesses. We will consume power.  </p>
<p>00:29:06:15 - 00:29:18:10<br>Marty<br>And then bringing this back to the renewable energy credits, particularly focusing on reliable hydrocarbon and nuclear to nuclear doesn't they're not able to take.  </p>
<p>00:29:18:19 - 00:29:19:05<br>Jamie<br>They are now.  </p>
<p>00:29:19:05 - 00:29:20:26<br>Marty<br>They are now. Okay, now they're. That's good.  </p>
<p>00:29:20:27 - 00:29:22:18<br>Jamie<br>Biden Biden threw him a bone.  </p>
<p>00:29:22:20 - 00:29:45:28<br>Marty<br>Okay, That's good. It's good to hear that. But honing in on natural gas in coal facilities that aren't able to reap the benefits of these credits, that's the threat I wrote over the weekend. I was at an event in Palm Beach on Saturday, and there was a panel talking about the quote unquote, climate crisis and energy markets. And this is the question I brought up.  </p>
<p>00:29:46:07 - 00:30:14:19<br>Marty<br>Knowing what we've seen in the Bitcoin mining industry is the renewable energy credits have created such a distortion in the pricing mechanism of the market that it is impossible to spin up new reliable generation. Not impossible, but very hard because you have these the material amount of times with negative pricing that really eats into the economic models of these reliable generation sources.  </p>
<p>00:30:15:05 - 00:30:50:00<br>Marty<br>And then it's just a if you're not going to decommission these reliable sources of your mandate, you just decommission them by distorting pricing mechanisms. And that's happening as well, where you have reliable sources that are up and running when they have to decommission themselves because they're not economically viable and I think it is imperative that the reliable generation sources that do not have the benefit of the recs that are out there really figure out a Bitcoin strategy because that is the only way that they're going to stay viable as long as these credits exist.  </p>
<p>00:30:51:01 - 00:31:22:07<br>Jamie<br>Absolutely. Yeah. And I wrote a in response to the the winter storm that we had here from Polar Vortex in January, I wrote a big tweet thread about this, which is that, I mean, if you look at what's happening here, so Texas is the second fastest or the fastest, I believe it is the fastest as of this year, the fastest growing renewable energy grid in America.  </p>
<p>00:31:22:16 - 00:31:47:17<br>Jamie<br>By volume. It's the number one wind state. It's going to be the number one solar state and west zone. A lot of this is going in in west Texas. West zone is 92% renewable installation by nameplate capacity. So this is like the grid of the future over there in West Texas, which is somewhat ironic given that it's, you know, a major hydrocarbon economy, but it is effectively the grid of the future over there.  </p>
<p>00:31:47:17 - 00:32:10:05<br>Jamie<br>So if you want to see what these utopian grid of the future ideas look like with all intermittent renewables, you just go look at West Texas and you can see what happens. There's some some system reliability issues because there's not as much inertia and rotating mass on the grid as when you have a bunch of coal plants and nuclear plants and combined cycle plants.  </p>
<p>00:32:10:16 - 00:32:44:03<br>Jamie<br>So you have a generation fleet that's more sensitive to a voltage issue somewhere else on the grid, meaning you could have cascading trips of multiple generators and then they trip off multiple loads and you could have blackouts with these largely renewable grids. You also have higher prices. On average, you have lower prices for 90% of the year. But the remaining 10% of the year is actually pushing prices up with the same gas prices that we had two or three years ago.  </p>
<p>00:32:44:16 - 00:33:12:20<br>Jamie<br>You know, if you exclude the Ukraine invasion when gas went to $10, the same natural gas, just to be clear, you have this of roughly the same gas price environment. The forward curve of power is twice as expensive and it's all coming from the shoulder. Our volatility when there's no solar and the wind hasn't picked up yet. And so people are paying more for power and they get a less reliable transmission grid.  </p>
<p>00:33:12:28 - 00:33:39:06<br>Jamie<br>So it is like this the the fastest growing renewable energy grids. I don't think the people who live in them understand that we are voluntarily degrading our standard of energy availability from a very first world standard to closer to a second world standard. And at the same time, we are paying more for a less reliable product. And that's just facts.  </p>
<p>00:33:39:06 - 00:34:03:09<br>Jamie<br>I mean, you know, it would be great if we could transition to a a future where we harness the power of the sun via wind speeds and and photovoltaic energy generation to power our species. But this transition right now, if you look at the early stages of it's like this is people are making a bad trade here. They're paying more for a worse product.  </p>
<p>00:34:03:22 - 00:34:19:27<br>Jamie<br>And at the same time, the federal government is going further and further into debt to to effectively subsidize this D reliability D reliability rising process of the power grid.  </p>
<p>00:34:20:06 - 00:34:41:10<br>Marty<br>Well, and going back to like the voltage synchronization and I learned Steve Koonin was at this event, he was explaining this over the weekend where basically with the natural gas plant a plant, a coal plant within the turbines, they can synchronize like the push and pull through the transmission lines where that does not exist for wind and solar, which is right, enters.  </p>
<p>00:34:42:01 - 00:34:46:28<br>Marty<br>It introduces this destabilizing effect that can lead to these rolling blackouts, correct?  </p>
<p>00:34:47:03 - 00:35:29:21<br>Jamie<br>Right. Yeah, it's called voltage, right through effectively, um, gas and anything that has a turbine that has this rotating mass that is being used to generate electricity, any turbine mechanism, the more rotating mass and inertia you have on, on a power grid, the right way to think about it is like it's like pressure in your tires. You're just it's you hit a little bump in the there and you don't feel it, uh, with inverter based renewables, wind and solar, you lose that inertia and you lose.  </p>
<p>00:35:29:21 - 00:35:54:19<br>Jamie<br>It's like your tire becomes slightly deflated, so you're going to feel a bit more shock. And that just to continue the busted AC analogy, if it works or not, it's like you hit a bump that's big enough and the bump actually hits your hubcap and hits it hits your ear, your wheel axle, or, you know, whatever the appropriate automotive part is and it dents it and it knocks your your car's alignment off.  </p>
<p>00:35:54:19 - 00:36:27:23<br>Jamie<br>In this case, it's you have a one system, one piece of the system trips and the sensitivity of the other pieces of the system will then trip in response to that and they can solve it. The solution is that the utilities need to upgrade different hubs, you know, different big substations are connection points within the system with shock absorbing equipment, and that then gets added into the transmission charges that consumers pay the next year.  </p>
<p>00:36:27:23 - 00:36:40:00<br>Jamie<br>And so you have to have beefier transmission infrastructure to be able to absorb of these shocks. And that's another way that costs go up. It's just not not energy costs, it's transmission costs in that case. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:36:40:22 - 00:36:49:19<br>Marty<br>So in your mind, what is the ideal mix of these unreliable generation sources and reliable generation sources?  </p>
<p>00:36:51:19 - 00:37:24:25<br>Jamie<br>I see both sides where if you can get the cost of solar and batteries and wind low enough and subsidies, push that demand to drive innovation in that and you upgrade the grid, you do end up having a lower cost of electricity because you're not relying on fuels. So you can see that it is utopian. It's far it's extremely difficult to understand if you have a constrained economic view.  </p>
<p>00:37:25:09 - 00:37:47:18<br>Jamie<br>So just as an example, right now, because of the amount of solar that's currently installed in West Texas and the amount that is coming in West Texas. And so if for, say, West Texas is the grid of the future, let's look what this market looks like. There's nobody will buy a power purchase agreement from a solar plant in West Texas.  </p>
<p>00:37:48:07 - 00:38:16:28<br>Jamie<br>And so you can't get that project financed anymore. So we're we're at we're hitting a wall in terms of the willingness of financial market counterparties and lenders to purchase this power for a term that is sufficient to underwrite the lender on it. So that means someone's got to put equity to to build a solar plant and no one's going to do that because you're just giving up a cash return for a fixed return.  </p>
<p>00:38:17:21 - 00:38:46:00<br>Jamie<br>It just doesn't make sense to do that. And through that and a number of other constraints, including grid volatility, battery economic viability, and we can spend 30 minutes just talking about this. It's really hard to see how we get there without having a centrally planned economy that's extremely inefficient for a while. It's already somewhat inefficient. We have this distorting signal production tax credits.  </p>
<p>00:38:46:07 - 00:39:13:06<br>Jamie<br>It's hard to see how we get there using our market economy. I think they should give nuclear a $50 production tax credit. They should give nuclear a $50 production tax credit. The government should subsidize the storage and and removal of nuclear waste. And we can decarbonize our grid since that's what a good percentage of the American people want and vote for by building nuclear plants.  </p>
<p>00:39:13:06 - 00:39:39:21<br>Jamie<br>And there's so much innovation with vision. You have small modular reactors, molten salt reactors, you have really good vision technologies that are much safer than, you know, the historical fission reactors that have melted down a few times in other places. And France, for all the things that they that they may not be the best at, like winning wars or whatnot.  </p>
<p>00:39:41:11 - 00:40:08:09<br>Jamie<br>They are great at nuclear, they have a great nuclear industry. They don't have a history of accidents. And the French government subsidizes the removal and storage of nuclear waste. And now they're one of the best performing European economies. In response to the the shortage of gas and having to import all this LNG and having those pipelines cut off from Russia.  </p>
<p>00:40:08:16 - 00:40:32:02<br>Jamie<br>The French economy from an electricity standpoint, is doing great because they rely on nuclear. And if you look at that, at the carbon footprint of the French power grid versus the German power grid, now that Germany has decommissioned its new plants, it's relying on tons of wind and tons of solar and then lost its access to natural gas.  </p>
<p>00:40:32:16 - 00:40:34:18<br>Jamie<br>They're burning wood pellets over there. They're burning wood.  </p>
<p>00:40:34:18 - 00:40:41:29<br>Marty<br>Pellets. They're cutting down forests in North Carolina, and we're shipping over wood pellets so that they can power their economy in Germany.  </p>
<p>00:40:42:00 - 00:41:06:03<br>Jamie<br>Exactly. And and they're paying more for power. And they're they're emitting more carbon than they were before. And it's extremely ironic that the German Green Party is so dumb and they did suffer a bunch of defeat in recent elections. So the German people are waking up, they're waking up, they're picking up on this being just really bad, illogical policy.  </p>
<p>00:41:06:03 - 00:41:16:14<br>Marty<br>But they're losing major incumbent industry that's been around for well over a century. BASF is moving out. Some manufacturers are moving out. They like it's too expensive. I can't do it here anymore.  </p>
<p>00:41:16:24 - 00:41:21:20<br>Jamie<br>And that should be scary for the world. Historically, a weak German economy has not led to good things.  </p>
<p>00:41:23:22 - 00:42:00:15<br>Marty<br>It is insane how we've gotten to this point because that's I wrote the piece in the Bitcoin Times Energy edition and I focused on Germany and it is insane what they did over the first two decades of the century. Like in 2002, their overall generation capacity was 115 gigawatts, 84% of it was nuclear or coal, nat gas. Since then, they've expanded their generation capacity by more than two X to 240 gigawatts, and the percentage of those re reliable sources of overall generation capacity is 34%.  </p>
<p>00:42:01:03 - 00:42:05:29<br>Marty<br>They decommissioned 20 more than 20 gigawatts of nuclear power. That was over that time.  </p>
<p>00:42:06:04 - 00:42:08:02<br>Jamie<br>I mean, it's a real head scratcher.  </p>
<p>00:42:08:19 - 00:42:29:17<br>Marty<br>And that's really the question there because like you think you more than double capacity. People look at that like, oh, that's awesome. Whatever that same time period, the amount of terawatt produced in 2002 versus 2021, which is when I ran the analysis too, fell by 2%.  </p>
<p>00:42:29:17 - 00:42:29:27<br>Jamie<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:42:30:13 - 00:42:35:23<br>Marty<br>And went from 53 terawatt hours a year to 51 point something.  </p>
<p>00:42:36:00 - 00:42:36:09<br>Jamie<br>Right.  </p>
<p>00:42:36:16 - 00:43:02:21<br>Marty<br>And then the price of electricity for your average three person German household went up 187%. Yeah. Over that time period. And I think that is the perfect case study that anybody in the world deploying an energy policy needs to look at and say get I get everybody wants to decarbonize. I personally don't think that is what we should be doing.  </p>
<p>00:43:02:21 - 00:43:23:16<br>Marty<br>I don't think I think the carbon the story is just that a hysteria, fear mongering campaign. I think we should be as efficient as possible, as clean as possible. But I don't think we should write these sources off just because they produce carbon emissions. But putting that aside, just looking at what Germany did, it's like we have the playbook here.  </p>
<p>00:43:23:16 - 00:43:24:14<br>Marty<br>It does not end well.  </p>
<p>00:43:26:18 - 00:44:10:20<br>Jamie<br>100%. Yeah, and I mean, we talked earlier about wind capacity factor is 30% of the year roughly. That's the number of megawatt hours you get for every one megawatt of installed wind. Solar is even worse. It's it's about 20%, 15 to 20%, depending on how strong the photovoltaics are. And so, yeah, you can double or triple the installed capacity of renewable generators, but because they're not generating when necessarily when there's peak demand, because they don't have the ability to ramp up production in response to peak demand and it.  </p>
<p>00:44:10:20 - 00:44:23:04<br>Marty<br>Should be common sense like when, when is peak demand come, when is really hot, why is it really part of the reason is the wind is blowing. And the other end of the spectrum is when it's really cold. And why is it really cold is because the clouds are blocking the sun.  </p>
<p>00:44:23:18 - 00:44:57:05<br>Jamie<br>It's right. Yeah. And and I mean wind in particular is really quite a I've gone as far as to say that wind power is poised for an electrical grid. Maybe a little extreme. If there's enough batteries, it would be okay. But if you look at a wind production, it is it peaks in the middle of the night when no one is using it and it declines to its lowest output level at the the hottest part of the day.  </p>
<p>00:44:57:18 - 00:45:28:24<br>Jamie<br>And every record power price day we had in ERCOT last summer was a low wind day. People don't even look at load as the the driving factor for peak pricing. They look at a metric called net load, which is load minus renewables. And so you could have a really hot day and and a ton of demand on the system.  </p>
<p>00:45:29:03 - 00:45:52:22<br>Jamie<br>But if the wind is blowing, you're going to be okay. You know, in the solar there's going to be generating and if the wind is blowing, you'll be okay. If there's no wind, it could not even be necessarily that hot of a day. And you'll have 5000 megawatt hour pricing. And it's the the the the electricity consumption peak every day of the summer happens.  </p>
<p>00:45:52:22 - 00:46:20:16<br>Jamie<br>At the same time it is between four and 5 p.m.. That is always when demand is peaking as the sun's been going ripping away for a long period the day it finally starts to decline and now it is like it's following a clock. 5 p.m. power demand starts to drop off as it starts to cool down because the sun is less intense and that used to be the highest price point of the day.  </p>
<p>00:46:20:16 - 00:46:47:21<br>Jamie<br>You know, it makes sense. That's the hottest. That's when power demand is the highest that should be the highest price. The demand for it, the good is highest. So that would be when the price is high. And power, of course, it's extremely temporally sensitive. It's a different price every 5 minutes in ERCOT Now because of the prevalence of solar, the actual price peak has shifted out by over 2 hours.  </p>
<p>00:46:47:28 - 00:47:26:00<br>Jamie<br>So it's no longer 4 to 5 p.m., it's now 7:08 p.m.. 7 to 10 p.m. is where you have peak pricing because the sun has gone down and almost every day like a clock, 7 to 10 this past August, a little bit of June summer, July and September, the prices were at administrative caps of $5,000. So through this price distorting and market distorting signal of production tax credit, we've actually shifted the the peak price of power out to a vector that is no longer consistent where there's peak demand and ideal.  </p>
<p>00:47:28:02 - 00:47:30:04<br>Jamie<br>Not not ideal, not ideal.  </p>
<p>00:47:30:06 - 00:47:50:09<br>Marty<br>So how do you square that? I think Korn meant you guys are using wind West Texas is the the future of energy grids everywhere. Is this just an anomalous awkward period where figure out how to use this or is this simply pure central planning corruption that needs to be fixed?  </p>
<p>00:47:51:26 - 00:48:30:00<br>Jamie<br>I see both sides and I love renewable energy. My business is economically viable and profitable because of this price distortion and we are following the price signals that are centrally planning overlords are are telling us to follow and we our load being where it is is contributing to the demand to build more these projects. And so you know in a way this cheap energy is creating a flourishing economic environment for the Bitcoin community in West Texas is it's what's happening there right now, which is kind of cool.  </p>
<p>00:48:30:16 - 00:49:25:11<br>Jamie<br>And I also think another really unique thing about it is that Bitcoin ers are the only people who are and not the only people, but they're consistently among the ranks, people who regularly tell the truth about power markets. Like everything else that Bitcoiners touch, they rabidly devour the available information. They learn entirely new disciplines and they become extremely educated on the all of the contributing factors to whatever situation is going on, whether it's, you know, distributed systems engineering, the history of money, you know, the history of various schools of economic thought cryptography, chip fabrication, chip manufacturing, silicon, all of this, all of these disciplines, bitcoiners, they learn about them.  </p>
<p>00:49:25:17 - 00:49:45:18<br>Jamie<br>They start sharing their reactions to these ideas and how they interplay with Bitcoin. And then you you listen to a Bitcoin or talk about one of those things that guys one of the probably the smartest people in the world on that particular thing. And now we see all these bitcoiners who are really smart about power. They're just going in and trying to tell the truth.  </p>
<p>00:49:47:03 - 00:50:07:27<br>Jamie<br>Cormac does not necessarily have a dog in the fight. We're taking advantage of the current distorted market. We're consuming lots of cheap power. We're profitably converting it into Bitcoin and I would say a second derivative of, yes, we don't have a dog in the fight. We're not going to tell you we want this generation type over that generation type.  </p>
<p>00:50:07:27 - 00:50:40:25<br>Jamie<br>All we want is cheap generation. We want the cheap as possible generation. As a second derivative of that, we become stakeholders in wherever we are situated. Jurisdiction. Ali and I like I have enormous exposure. Every employee in my company, every executive has enormous exposure to the reliability of the Texas grid, the cost of the Texas grid and the overall well-being of our electricity marketplace as an orderly and function place functioning place to do business.  </p>
<p>00:50:41:06 - 00:51:09:29<br>Jamie<br>And so you get this second derivative where educated, open minded and unbiased bitcoiners come in and tell the truth about this stuff. And I, I really don't think it's a coincidence that every Bitcoin here resoundingly says the same exact thing. We have to nuclearized the entire economy. And it's almost like the opposite of a politician where there is no NIMBY, there's there's none of that.  </p>
<p>00:51:09:29 - 00:51:38:10<br>Jamie<br>It's just unadulterated truth. And if you contrast that with a politician, you have this this rabid voter base who's hysterical about carbon and they're, you know, paving themselves to roads and throwing paint on throwing oil on paintings and being hysterical. They're single issue voters on climate. It is what it is, right or wrong. True or not, it is what it is.  </p>
<p>00:51:39:18 - 00:52:10:21<br>Jamie<br>Getting elected requires pandering to those voters. And you can see that in the Venn diagram of I'm doing something about decarbonizing the economy and ideal policy in terms of going to going to get me reelected. Nuclear is not in the middle of that Venn diagram because nuclear pisses people off. People don't want nuke plants in their backyard. They're not educated about nuclear safety and the improvements in the industry.  </p>
<p>00:52:10:29 - 00:52:35:19<br>Jamie<br>And so building a bunch of dumb wind turbines, building too many wind turbines and solar panels that create a massive distortion in power markets, raise prices and reduce reliability. That ends up being the Venn diagram place where you can appear to be doing something. It's going to be enough for four years to get reelected, and you're not actually a long term stakeholder in what you're doing.  </p>
<p>00:52:35:19 - 00:52:48:16<br>Jamie<br>It's really bad politics and I don't know how it's going to change. I don't know who's going to be the nuclear renaissance man. Nobody listens to Bitcoiners anyways, So it's.  </p>
<p>00:52:48:29 - 00:52:59:03<br>Marty<br>I should start. I think we just need to start buying these assets. That's happening too. I've seen it. It's one of my you U.S. people are buying coal plants. People are buying that gas generation.  </p>
<p>00:52:59:11 - 00:53:03:01<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, because they're building new plants. One of my long term goals.  </p>
<p>00:53:03:08 - 00:53:08:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah. It's a virtuous goal to strive for. Thank you for striving for it.  </p>
<p>00:53:08:16 - 00:53:17:02<br>Jamie<br>It's hard. I mean, they don't make it easy. Yeah. Every engineering decision in a nuke plant gets ten x the scrutiny of of a solar plant.  </p>
<p>00:53:17:12 - 00:53:40:28<br>Marty<br>Well, that's. I spoke with somebody who runs a nuclear power plant in Nebraska a couple of weeks ago, and they have this exact problem overbuilding wind specifically. And they want, I think, 20% of the year. The nuke plant has negative pricing. And they just said that because that's the other thing where the pricing corruption do, the subsidies comes in is nuke plants.  </p>
<p>00:53:40:28 - 00:53:57:08<br>Marty<br>You can't just spin them up and down. Yeah, you have to keep them on, you know, And so these plants have to eat that negative pricing when it comes. And it's becoming longer periods of time throughout the year as these subsidies incentivize all this unreliable generation.  </p>
<p>00:53:57:24 - 00:54:11:23<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, it's it's really it is a truly distorting price signal because it is actively disincentivizing the type of generation that the grid needs to at least maintain reliability or improve it.  </p>
<p>00:54:12:00 - 00:54:23:16<br>Marty<br>Bitcoin fixes this. Just fucking put 100 megawatts of a mining operation behind the meter, right? Give the finger to the wind farms. When the negative pricing comes, say, hey, we're producing revenue anyway.  </p>
<p>00:54:23:27 - 00:54:30:00<br>Jamie<br>Definitely. Yeah. It it fits so well with reliable generation and avoiding negative prices.  </p>
<p>00:54:30:08 - 00:54:30:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:54:30:29 - 00:54:33:27<br>Jamie<br>Especially like the crappier rigs.  </p>
<p>00:54:34:06 - 00:54:54:13<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And luckily it does seem like the bitcoin mining industry is becoming more smart about this, particularly behind the meter. To date it's been a lot of front of the meter, um, basically getting electricity from a substation that's connected to transmission line. I think a lot of people in the industry are like, how do we get closer to the source?  </p>
<p>00:54:54:13 - 00:55:00:14<br>Marty<br>Let's go to the Wright Power facility and get to the point before it even goes through the transmission light.  </p>
<p>00:55:01:07 - 00:55:34:18<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, you do avoid a bunch of transmission costs. If you do that in ERCOT, you can get a nodal price instead of a zonal price. And nodal prices tend to be lower than zonal prices because the every every power generation facility in ERCOT has a node. It has its own pricing point on the grid. And every load on ERCOT has they don't have a specific nodal location.  </p>
<p>00:55:34:26 - 00:56:02:06<br>Jamie<br>It gets blended into what's called the load zone. And inside of the load zone, all transmission charges to route power to different users throughout the grid are basically aggregated and then averaged and split across all consumers. So in the West Zone right now, because there's a lot of Bitcoin miners popping up, there's a lot of renewable generators popping up and things are growing and moving pretty fast out there.  </p>
<p>00:56:02:19 - 00:56:31:00<br>Jamie<br>The trends, the transmission cost to serve loads that are isolated specifically in the far west of Texas are really really high. And so those costs then get subsidized across the entire load zone because what they don't want, and it does make sense, is they don't want a particular load in a very remote corner corner of the grid. They have to pay ten times the cost of every other load in the in the grid for generators.  </p>
<p>00:56:31:06 - 00:56:49:12<br>Jamie<br>They're willing to to do that. And they want to incentivize generation to go in the right places on the grid. But for load, there's very little tolerance for a particular electrical load to pay a drastically higher price, higher price. And so the cost to serve that load is set by the market and by the generators, and that's averaged across everybody else.  </p>
<p>00:56:51:06 - 00:57:17:11<br>Jamie<br>And as a result, the the additional transmission charges to those loads that are in very remote places, they end up driving up the average price everywhere else. If you are behind the meter next to your own generator, you don't you avoid all those charges. And in the summertime, when the entire generation fleet is ripping, these transmission charges are relatively low.  </p>
<p>00:57:17:11 - 00:57:45:00<br>Jamie<br>It's called congestion or basis. But as soon as the weather cools down and the system has much less load on it, so starting in October and basically going through May, the basis has been averaging over $10 a megawatt hour. So you're paying a four penny higher during those outside months. So if you co-locate with a generator and just do a direct agreement with them, you get that generator pricing.  </p>
<p>00:57:45:00 - 00:58:12:28<br>Jamie<br>And it is a huge event. It's a it's another reason why the energy community should move close to the Bitcoin community because the same thing could happen to them. Like if you have a a power generation node that's in the middle of 25 wind farms, you're going to get the lowest prices on the grid for your power because you're producing in a place where there is no user, there aren't not very many users of the power feeds.  </p>
<p>00:58:12:29 - 00:58:19:24<br>Jamie<br>Bring in a bitcoin mining load. You're like, Oh cool, I'm out of that now. I got my own. Come on, little guy here. And he just takes all the power I give him.  </p>
<p>00:58:20:00 - 00:58:30:15<br>Marty<br>And it seems like bitcoin adoption is picking up, the price is going up. That's another thing heading into the having which is less than 10,000 blocks away after this weekend.  </p>
<p>00:58:30:24 - 00:58:31:15<br>Jamie<br>Don't remind me.  </p>
<p>00:58:33:13 - 00:58:46:16<br>Marty<br>But it is an interesting dynamic heading into the having if this price appreciation continues. Yeah, so it seems like a very unique dynamic that hasn't existed in a pre having market today.  </p>
<p>00:58:46:17 - 00:58:52:16<br>Jamie<br>We've got rapidly rising difficulty. We've got rapidly rising price. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:58:52:29 - 00:58:58:09<br>Marty<br>What 50 day 50 K congratulations. Let's go or a 50 K.  </p>
<p>00:58:58:16 - 00:59:01:24<br>Jamie<br>So we haven't been above 50,000 since I think.  </p>
<p>00:59:01:27 - 00:59:02:05<br>Marty<br>20.  </p>
<p>00:59:02:05 - 00:59:06:00<br>Jamie<br>One April of 2022. Or was it 22.  </p>
<p>00:59:06:00 - 00:59:11:04<br>Marty<br>I think it was like I think now because yeah, we peaked in November 21.  </p>
<p>00:59:11:07 - 00:59:24:04<br>Jamie<br>We peaked at and just below 70 in November and then we stayed around So it might have been between. Yeah, it's been a while. Yeah. Welcome back, boys. Let's go. Cool.  </p>
<p>00:59:24:10 - 00:59:30:07<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Exciting prices for everybody, as you said. Hash rates absolutely screaming right now. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:59:30:25 - 00:59:37:16<br>Jamie<br>And fees. We've had a couple of periods where fees have been surprisingly high, too. So it's spending. Yeah, it's been a wild time.  </p>
<p>00:59:37:28 - 00:59:41:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So what what are you worried about heading into the havoc?  </p>
<p>00:59:42:02 - 01:00:03:01<br>Jamie<br>I think the thing I'm most interested to see is what kind of difficulty adjustment happens. Um, after the having Seems like there's a huge range of predictions. And did you ever read the COIN metrics report called the Signal and the nonce?  </p>
<p>01:00:03:20 - 01:00:04:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah, the cream. Right.  </p>
<p>01:00:04:15 - 01:00:17:23<br>Jamie<br>That I, I think so, but I'm not 100% sure. But effectively what they did was they used nonce patterns in the, you know, the machines that make up the majority of.  </p>
<p>01:00:18:00 - 01:00:24:10<br>Marty<br>Yeah, you can essentially the reverse engineer which machine is producing which nonce.  </p>
<p>01:00:24:19 - 01:00:25:05<br>Jamie<br>Exactly.  </p>
<p>01:00:25:14 - 01:00:34:01<br>Marty<br>And so you can get a use the chain data to get a landscape of the inventory of machines that are being used exactly in point in time.  </p>
<p>01:00:34:05 - 01:01:10:29<br>Jamie<br>And so you look at that report, it was released at the end of 2022. I'm not sure when the dataset they used was, but as of the end of 2022, 60 of the network was um, s19 and thirties or, or lower efficiency machines. So right around 30 to 35 joules per T and just looking at the break evens of that equipment and where we are today, I think as the next difficulty adjustment is projected to be 9%.  </p>
<p>01:01:11:15 - 01:01:13:23<br>Jamie<br>Yes, yes. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:01:14:06 - 01:01:21:22<br>Marty<br>And I look at look up the estimate, the hash rate of all that space above 600, it'll.  </p>
<p>01:01:21:22 - 01:01:41:29<br>Jamie<br>Be above 600 with that adjustment and uh, the, the break even now Bitcoin rip and so this information may be stale, but let's say that after this 10% difficulty adjustment and given the fact that we just probably rallied 10% over the last six or seven days, the break evens there are in the high seventies, mid to high seventies.  </p>
<p>01:01:43:06 - 01:01:45:00<br>Marty<br>696, 91 six.  </p>
<p>01:01:45:00 - 01:01:45:13<br>Jamie<br>92.  </p>
<p>01:01:45:15 - 01:01:49:06<br>Marty<br>For our estimate. So yeah, take that with a small grain of salt.  </p>
<p>01:01:49:08 - 01:02:10:03<br>Jamie<br>Right. So you have break evens in the mid-to-high seventies right now and you know having are going to bring that to the having is going to bring that to $37 in megawatt hour 37 or $39 megawatt hour. Not a lot of people who have power costs set it below all in power costs that are below $37 a megawatt hour.  </p>
<p>01:02:10:16 - 01:02:13:08<br>Marty<br>3.7 cents a kilowatt hour right out there.  </p>
<p>01:02:13:21 - 01:02:48:24<br>Jamie<br>And so I'm a big believer that we're going to have adjustments, going to have material downside difficulty adjustments in April and May and in previous cycles, ones that I've been seeing a bunch thrown around is the number of days it takes it has taken historically post having for hashrate to recover to its previous value immediately prior to the having and it's been the the last two halvings were between 30 and 70 days that hashrate fully recovered.  </p>
<p>01:02:49:05 - 01:03:21:29<br>Jamie<br>But now we have so much of the hash rate is in ERCOT and so we have April 20th having projection date of May, and then we immediately start the Texas summer where last summer during a Bitcoin bull market and a little bit of an upward upward momentum market difficulty barely adjusted at all through the entirety of the June 15th through September 15th period.  </p>
<p>01:03:22:04 - 01:03:24:28<br>Marty<br>As miners were participating in demand response.  </p>
<p>01:03:25:09 - 01:03:51:07<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, because there was it was active curtailment and and there is demand response, which was curtailing miners. And it was a pretty hot summer everywhere. So that was every northern hemisphere grid. And the ERCOT obviously being the biggest one with a very, very hot high electricity price summer. So I think we could see that hashrate does not fully recover until fall October.  </p>
<p>01:03:51:14 - 01:04:07:15<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, October would be my prediction for when hash rate is going to recover to its previous level from before. The having with the caveat that if Bitcoin just goes on an absolute heater throughout the rest of the year all, all bets are off.  </p>
<p>01:04:07:15 - 01:04:14:03<br>Marty<br>Yeah we run the like if Sam samples we run to 100 K before the having happens. That helps a lot of things.  </p>
<p>01:04:14:08 - 01:04:15:03<br>Jamie<br>That would be wild.  </p>
<p>01:04:15:13 - 01:04:34:03<br>Marty<br>But then you have this dynamic to two dynamics at play where the sweaty ones are coming to market. It seems like Bitmain's going to be able to produce a lot of them. Yeah, I'm ten a month out between 50 and 100,000 per month. Most efficient, highest hashing machines that we've ever seen. They have a hydro unit which is even.  </p>
<p>01:04:34:03 - 01:04:34:16<br>Jamie<br>More.  </p>
<p>01:04:35:02 - 01:04:37:06<br>Marty<br>Efficient, higher hashing.  </p>
<p>01:04:37:18 - 01:04:39:24<br>Jamie<br>Which even are a lot of people buying those hydros.  </p>
<p>01:04:39:26 - 01:04:40:20<br>Marty<br>I'm not sure. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:04:40:22 - 01:04:42:24<br>Jamie<br>I mean, you know, I'm sorry to interrupt.  </p>
<p>01:04:42:24 - 01:04:55:01<br>Marty<br>You know, I'm not sure, but we have that dynamic coming and it seems like they're already being plugged in, which I would imagine a lot of the hashrate growth that we've seen over the last few weeks is anyone's getting plugged in and they have a log.  </p>
<p>01:04:55:01 - 01:04:55:23<br>Jamie<br>Of 20 ones.  </p>
<p>01:04:55:29 - 01:05:07:21<br>Marty<br>Then you have this confluence of events where the international markets seem to be seeing what's going on here in Texas and begin to get into the hash hash rates, if you will.  </p>
<p>01:05:08:09 - 01:05:35:22<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, for sure. The other thing, but the S21 is the research that's coming out on them is they're very thermally sensitive so that that hash rate will also be restricted in light of their during the summer. Yeah. Yeah. So it's it could all come online and then there could be a big adjustment from lower uptime. All of those S nineties and M thirties going offline a lot of curtailment for power optimization.  </p>
<p>01:05:36:16 - 01:05:37:09<br>Jamie<br>It's going to be interesting.  </p>
<p>01:05:37:16 - 01:05:43:02<br>Marty<br>A lot of them will be in low power mode throughout the summer. Oh yeah. Which they made easy with this, this model.  </p>
<p>01:05:43:22 - 01:05:44:07<br>Jamie<br>Oh they did.  </p>
<p>01:05:44:15 - 01:05:45:00<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>01:05:45:06 - 01:05:51:00<br>Jamie<br>Okay. So you it's you don't need as much the third party firmwares.  </p>
<p>01:05:51:21 - 01:06:03:06<br>Marty<br>Now you probably would benefit from it because you can probably get more modular with what you want to do But they do have stuck power mode, high power mode and low power mode.  </p>
<p>01:06:03:08 - 01:06:07:06<br>Jamie<br>Do they have a curtailment, uh, function? That's. That's good.  </p>
<p>01:06:07:13 - 01:06:08:03<br>Marty<br>I doubt it.  </p>
<p>01:06:08:24 - 01:06:15:06<br>Jamie<br>I'm not sure. It's wild, man. Yeah, And is there any other industry where the the manufacturer of a good.  </p>
<p>01:06:15:10 - 01:06:16:08<br>Marty<br>Case us such.  </p>
<p>01:06:16:08 - 01:06:21:08<br>Jamie<br>Distinct customer base that regularly mistreats them and there's very little consequence.  </p>
<p>01:06:21:12 - 01:06:28:00<br>Marty<br>So there's only two really. One, maybe we can call it a duopoly, but it's trending towards a monopoly.  </p>
<p>01:06:28:01 - 01:06:33:07<br>Jamie<br>Right. Um, I have heard good things about uh, or down.  </p>
<p>01:06:35:22 - 01:06:36:09<br>Marty<br>Were done.  </p>
<p>01:06:36:13 - 01:06:38:12<br>Jamie<br>Or a been is a.  </p>
<p>01:06:38:13 - 01:06:45:24<br>Marty<br>It's the ones that did the, the they basically have there is like a North American Bitcoin conference. Um, release it.  </p>
<p>01:06:46:16 - 01:07:29:24<br>Jamie<br>I would, I don't remember seeing them there but I'm sure that they did um marathon disclosed a a seed investment in them early on and um, they're now releasing their first ASICs uh, and they're good and they are, they have the functionality that a Texas based Bitcoin miner would care about. They can under clock, they can overclock, they curtail really quickly and the you don't need to use third party firmware it's all built right into the the miner firmware, the stock firmware and it's great tool kit.  </p>
<p>01:07:30:16 - 01:07:52:12<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So let's dive into this a little more for anybody who may be ignorant to this dynamic in the mining industry, which is you have these machines, you get them from the manufacturer or the manufacturer has a firmware that basically runs the machines. But miners, particularly in ERCOT, need to do more of their machines, particularly if they want to participate in demand response.  </p>
<p>01:07:52:21 - 01:08:14:04<br>Marty<br>Mainly they need to be able to turn down very quickly, which the stock firmware does not enable. So you have to go to third party firmware services that essentially jailbreak the firmware on your basic, inject their own firmware that can then communicate with the pricing API to to do all this in an efficient manner.  </p>
<p>01:08:16:03 - 01:08:45:05<br>Jamie<br>Yeah. And uh, the, the core features that you would want, well, take a step back, you sort of have two main categories of functionality. You have performance, meaning how many watts can I run through my chip and, and the more watts that I run through my chip, I may lose efficiency a little bit, but I'm going to get more Bitcoin out of it because I'm going to be submitting more valid shares to a pool.  </p>
<p>01:08:45:05 - 01:09:17:09<br>Jamie<br>I'm going to be attempting more solutions at a successfully mined block. Then you have a separate functionality, which is the ability to respond to either a signal which is called a base point or a frequency based point from the grid operator, which will say, Hey, I need you to set your machine to this, and you have to respond to that quickly, or you're responding to a free market power price input or the ERCOT pricing API prices every 5 minutes.  </p>
<p>01:09:17:18 - 01:09:50:00<br>Jamie<br>You respond to that data and then you power down the miner or continue mining based on that that price input. So neither of those functionalities comes out of the box with the existing manufacturers that you would know. And so like you said, this third party firmware is effectively jailbreak the that the miner and they allow a and non manufacturer firmware to run on top of it.  </p>
<p>01:09:50:00 - 01:10:20:10<br>Jamie<br>And these farmers are great and they're they're way better and on the overclocking and under clocking side it's not really surprising that the basic manufacturers aren't thinking like this because they're not really mining that much. Maybe because they don't focus as much on cooling, but cooling is so important. It is the name of the game. This is why immersion in hydro y immersion is sort of dominating now in terms of performance and hydro is the next level of it.  </p>
<p>01:10:21:02 - 01:10:49:14<br>Jamie<br>Immersion is your miners are submerged in an oil bath and it becomes a fluid dynamics equation instead of an aerodynamics equations. They're just constantly pumping oil that is colder than the chips through the miners because the oil is coating 100% of the surface area of the chips instead of air, which is not hitting anywhere near 100% of the chips, you're able to dissipate more heat off of the chip into the fluid.  </p>
<p>01:10:49:23 - 01:11:37:25<br>Jamie<br>And the fluid is exhausted outside of the tub that the miners are sitting in. And it's put through some kind of radiator dry, cooler heat exchanger type of thing. And it's a constant loop. You have a big plumbing equation, you have a big fluid dynamics equation, and that helps you draw more heat off the chips. The reason why that's important is because the ideal operating temperature of a chip is 60 degrees Celsius plus or minus, and then the you can run a ton of wattage through a chip way more than it's standard operating spec as long as the chip stays at 60 C, it's not going to cause any harm to it.  </p>
<p>01:11:37:25 - 01:12:01:29<br>Jamie<br>So these things are incredibly robust and there's no other reason why the manufacturers maybe aren't that clued into this or they don't care is because there's no other computing industry that treats a computer like a Corvette, you know, where they're just like, dump the fuel in, Let's go. We want to get as many horsepower out of this thing as possible and as many RPMs as possible, because it's a vanity engine.  </p>
<p>01:12:02:10 - 01:12:30:28<br>Jamie<br>Bitcoin mining is effectively like that because each incremental watt of electricity you push through gets you an incremental quantity of SATs or fractions of said in the case of Watt. And so you have this this big thermal optimization. What that ends up looking like in Texas, if you have a good cooling system, is you're able to overclock your machines sometimes as much as 20 or 30% in the winter when the ambient temperature is cold enough.  </p>
<p>01:12:31:08 - 01:12:58:17<br>Jamie<br>And in the summertime you're actually you actually have to do the opposite. Like we're out in the West Texas desert, it gets well above 100 degrees almost every day. And so that's the thermal, the cooling capacity. Thermally speaking of our cooling system, which is normally very good at dissipating heat, it actually is reduced because the containers are hotter.  </p>
<p>01:12:58:28 - 01:13:31:24<br>Jamie<br>The air outside that you're using to cool the fluid is hotter, everything is hotter. And so you have to reduce the amount of wattage that you're pushing through the machine in order to target that 60 degrees Celsius temperature. And so what this company or Dean has done really well, from what we understand, we haven't tested them out, but we've talked to enough smart guys who we trust that have tested them is they allow you to tune the minor voltage and frequency up, which gets you a different wattage draw from the stock setting.  </p>
<p>01:13:31:24 - 01:13:56:16<br>Jamie<br>You can go way down. And when you do that, drastically improve the efficiency of the machine. You can also go way up and you decrease the efficiency of the machine. And the reason why that's important is because if power is if the cost of electricity is zero, you want to push as many watts through your mining machine as humanly possible because you don't particularly care if your machine goes from 28 joules.  </p>
<p>01:13:56:16 - 01:14:23:02<br>Jamie<br>A tear has your efficiency to 36 joules. Tear ash, you don't really care because the input cost of that power is zero. And you know, in Texas we have 10% of the year that's negative pricing. We have zero in our pricing for electricity all the time. So these these 14 guys have made a minor that is very well fit for an electricity market like Texas that has a lot of zero pricing and has a lot of very high pricing, you can get paid a lot to curtail.  </p>
<p>01:14:24:02 - 01:14:35:13<br>Jamie<br>And so it has this is like the what the minor firmware of the future should look like. And by the way, firma is expensive. You pay 1 to 2% of your revenue for firmware. So it's a huge cost savings to buy from them.  </p>
<p>01:14:37:12 - 01:14:44:29<br>Marty<br>And how big of a splash they're going to make in the market Hack how many machines can they produce?  </p>
<p>01:14:44:29 - 01:14:48:15<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, I mean, it's starting an AC company is really tricky because.  </p>
<p>01:14:48:18 - 01:15:20:19<br>Marty<br>That's the thing I worry about most is extremely capital intensive, takes a long amount of time and that time, well, that's maybe we're hitting an inflection point with the time aspect is not as, uh, it's not as important as it was in the past where you have these large jumps from seven nanometer to five nanometer, three nanometer. We're literally reaching physical limits on these chips that you're likely not going to have the step function improvement in the leadership level that has existed in the past.  </p>
<p>01:15:20:19 - 01:15:34:07<br>Marty<br>So the concept of asset commodification has been talked a lot in the mining community over the last five years. If we're getting close to that point, maybe the barrier to entry for a new ac-dc manufacturers is a bit lower.  </p>
<p>01:15:35:04 - 01:16:05:29<br>Jamie<br>I do agree with that. I still think that there's really it's very hard. Yeah. Um, simply because from the perspective of an operator, we probably are picking the machine that we're going to run six months out from when we, when we run it or when we even buy it. Um, so you're thinking about what's the form factor of this machine?  </p>
<p>01:16:06:11 - 01:16:34:12<br>Jamie<br>Um, what's the availability of this machine from a pricing perspective, and is it, is it going to function the way that I believe, you know, there have been historically, even with Bitmain, the S17 had a failure rate bad epoxy, bad epoxy, the heatsinks were falling off. You had a massive failure rate on that. So there's even risk with with the existing manufacturers then what was that one that kind of looked like Mountain Dew.  </p>
<p>01:16:35:13 - 01:16:36:03<br>Marty<br>New miner.  </p>
<p>01:16:36:03 - 01:16:43:06<br>Jamie<br>Or something? Yeah, new miner that had a 50% failure rate and people who bought those.  </p>
<p>01:16:43:26 - 01:16:46:16<br>Marty<br>Were actually go back drag events. Yeah. Down the.  </p>
<p>01:16:46:16 - 01:17:17:28<br>Jamie<br>Line drag. So there's a huge risk in buying the first batch of ASICs from a brand new manufacturer and yeah, if you're designing for a particular basic it's you have to really commit to it. And so as a premise it should be traded at a discount to a bitmain or a micro team. You know, even MakerBot trades at a slight discount to bitmain still after and it's been around for five years.  </p>
<p>01:17:18:11 - 01:17:36:14<br>Jamie<br>And so if you're going to be a new A6 manufacturer, you probably need to price at a 25% discount to the market in order to compensate your customers for taking a risk on a new batch. And then that gets better and better and better as time goes on. But it's so it's one part asset commodification and reaching the state of the art in the chip industry.  </p>
<p>01:17:36:14 - 01:17:47:22<br>Jamie<br>And then that's the other part, consumer mindset and consumer psychology of taking that risk. So it's not a risk to be taken lightly. If you're a miner, you could literally lose your whole business.  </p>
<p>01:17:47:22 - 01:18:12:13<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Now that's the other thing, leaning into like Asia commodification and we've talked about this on Peter's podcast, but it's worth repeating, like even within Bitmain alone, like the PSA is like, right with the power supply units that literally you to plug your machine into a wall like they're not uniform across every model. Right? And that blows my mind.  </p>
<p>01:18:12:13 - 01:18:24:24<br>Marty<br>It's like, how have we not gotten to a point where it's like, you can get an order and expect a certain PSU, right? Even between like different model, different XP batches have different pieces.  </p>
<p>01:18:24:24 - 01:18:36:07<br>Jamie<br>Remember when they made one version of the J Pro like two inches longer than the previous one? Yeah. And it caught everyone off guard. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:18:36:09 - 01:18:38:22<br>Marty<br>Fucked up all their heat circulation, right?  </p>
<p>01:18:38:22 - 01:18:44:21<br>Jamie<br>I mean, if you're running immersion, two inches is a lot. Yeah, that's, you know, you design an immersion tank.  </p>
<p>01:18:45:27 - 01:18:47:20<br>Marty<br>Based off the form factor specs.  </p>
<p>01:18:47:20 - 01:18:57:09<br>Jamie<br>Exactly. Because you need to have uniform flow rate and flow distribution of the fluid through, all of the miners and so little changes to the form factor.  </p>
<p>01:18:57:12 - 01:18:58:16<br>Marty<br>Fuck up the physics.  </p>
<p>01:18:58:16 - 01:19:05:22<br>Jamie<br>It could totally screw up. It could screw up your entire cooling system. Yeah. If you're trying to be extremely efficient with fluid.  </p>
<p>01:19:05:22 - 01:19:12:11<br>Marty<br>We're so early like that, it's like because we were and you weren't where you were in Nashville. But no, we're.  </p>
<p>01:19:12:11 - 01:19:16:08<br>Jamie<br>You know, I didn't wear one we were talking to. I'll be there for a Bitcoin conference.  </p>
<p>01:19:16:08 - 01:19:35:25<br>Marty<br>So there was, um, at the Energy and Mining Summit Nashville last month. There was incumbent data center guys that are getting into Bitcoin mining that was like their one like piece of feedback was like, I can't believe that none of this is uniform yet. Like this is such slapstick.  </p>
<p>01:19:36:05 - 01:19:36:12<br>Jamie<br>Right.  </p>
<p>01:19:36:15 - 01:19:39:29<br>Marty<br>Activity. The fact that you guys put up with any of this is the same. Um.  </p>
<p>01:19:40:27 - 01:19:49:16<br>Jamie<br>I know it's, uh, bitcoin miners are just rabid risk on consumers. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:19:50:03 - 01:19:53:18<br>Marty<br>It is the wow. It's like digital wild getting. Yeah, to an extent.  </p>
<p>01:19:54:12 - 01:20:45:28<br>Jamie<br>Plus, you really don't have much recourse. You know, it's no, it's a Chinese vendor and they send you something. You got to plug it in no matter what. You've got it. You've got two a year and the first three months are critical in a rising difficulty environment. And it's yeah, I mean, an American manufacturer would be great. Yes, I could, I should talk to some folks about this and it, it almost got off the ground, but it didn't a cooperative an American based asec cooperative, where a couple of really good chip guys got together and started a nonprofit cooperative where you put a little bit in for the IP and and the tape out and  </p>
<p>01:20:45:28 - 01:21:14:07<br>Jamie<br>all of that just to get the process rolling. And then everybody got a machine at cost. So you just you bought the fab time, the foundry time, you got paid back in six and and you look what happened with the intel. I think it, it was a first iteration of that with a reputable chip manufacturer and that was that did not work out well for the firms who participate in that.  </p>
<p>01:21:14:19 - 01:21:40:28<br>Jamie<br>Now, history has been really unkind to people. Take incremental risk in Bitcoin mining, whether it's incremental financial risk, um, like us taking on USD debt, getting into anything upstream in manufacturing, the A6, trying a brand new ac-dc manufacturer, buying their equipment for the first time, control boards, even power supplies. You know.  </p>
<p>01:21:40:28 - 01:21:43:03<br>Marty<br>It's building your own data centers.  </p>
<p>01:21:43:29 - 01:22:06:02<br>Jamie<br>That risk I think you need to take I think you need to take the risk of building your own data centers. And I think you need to take the risk of getting as close to the wholesale market of electricity generation on power side as those risks are. You can control them really well. They do require investment, but you can control them much better.  </p>
<p>01:22:06:15 - 01:22:06:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:22:08:00 - 01:22:16:09<br>Jamie<br>Because think about it, if you rely on a third party equipment vendor for your data center infrastructure, that's also a risk.  </p>
<p>01:22:16:17 - 01:22:17:00<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>01:22:17:03 - 01:22:17:21<br>Jamie<br>As we know.  </p>
<p>01:22:18:02 - 01:22:41:19<br>Marty<br>They have to weigh the rest of the time because I go back to this name of the game, I think again, the whole industry has been going through this iterative process, and that's one thing that encourages me this cycle. It seems that the industry is getting smarter about when they purchased the basics and where they are in terms of infrastructure build out with those buys because you want to buy those 86, get them delivered and plug them in immediately.  </p>
<p>01:22:41:20 - 01:22:45:06<br>Marty<br>Immediately. Yeah. Which last cycle was not happening.  </p>
<p>01:22:46:09 - 01:22:48:28<br>Jamie<br>Right. And it's still happening today.  </p>
<p>01:22:49:01 - 01:22:57:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Rackspace is. Yeah. Scarcer Than bitcoin it seems right now. Is it. It was for a while. Right now I.  </p>
<p>01:22:58:03 - 01:22:59:11<br>Jamie<br>Am not in the market so I don't.  </p>
<p>01:22:59:11 - 01:23:01:07<br>Marty<br>Know. I think the market is responding but.  </p>
<p>01:23:01:16 - 01:23:02:20<br>Jamie<br>Yeah we don't have as.  </p>
<p>01:23:02:21 - 01:23:11:21<br>Marty<br>The time in 2122 where after the Chinese migration people like, yeah, we'll take your assets, we'll plug it in and how they got ship and know where to plug.  </p>
<p>01:23:11:21 - 01:23:26:04<br>Jamie<br>Them in. Yeah I know that. Yeah they the Ac-dc manufacturers were doing a lot of hosting deals, trying to get xrp's plugged in. We host one of the coolest things about our company, so we have no customers.  </p>
<p>01:23:27:08 - 01:23:29:00<br>Marty<br>It's a lot less stress.  </p>
<p>01:23:29:04 - 01:23:45:10<br>Jamie<br>My last business we had lot of customers and my two business partners in that company, they both love. They love that about this business. Technically, we do have a customer. It's an algorithm. It's our customers. They distributed.  </p>
<p>01:23:45:19 - 01:23:46:01<br>Marty<br>Hash car.  </p>
<p>01:23:46:02 - 01:23:51:19<br>Jamie<br>SHA256 Yeah, it's it's a distributed computer algorithm.  </p>
<p>01:23:52:00 - 01:23:56:16<br>Marty<br>That's technically that's customer of the Bitcoin network looking to transact or is it your customers?  </p>
<p>01:23:58:13 - 01:24:26:19<br>Jamie<br>They are, but also just the, the Bitcoin code. Yeah, that, that's where the vast majority of our revenue comes from is the distribution schedule of the original algorithm. Yeah. And then there are some incremental people doing God's work and paying me fees, uh, paying us fees. And yeah, I mean, I, you know, this is I'm the king of controversy on this topic because I like fees, but.  </p>
<p>01:24:26:25 - 01:24:27:10<br>Marty<br>I like fees.  </p>
<p>01:24:27:10 - 01:25:10:25<br>Jamie<br>So I, I'm very indiscriminate about fees. I want anybody who wants to pay me fees to be able to do so. One of the things I think is that's going to be the coolest development over the next ten years is if if we assume that fee markets are going to materialize and become, um, the majority of contribution to mining revenue versus the way they are now where the subsidy is, I mean, in this block era, I think averaged 1 to 20 subsidy versus fees, maybe maybe 1 to 17 when we have it's going to be 1 to 10.  </p>
<p>01:25:11:20 - 01:25:50:22<br>Jamie<br>Then we have in 2028, it's going to be 1 to 5. If fees continue to grow, you could see an entire block epic to be parity between fees and subsidy. In the end, you know, the 1.6 block reward error, 1.5 and change whatever it's going to be in 2028 to 2032. But what should happen or what I predict will happen that's going to be really interesting is the block times are going to be much slower during periods of peak demand that that phenomenon is going to accelerate like in the Texas summer block.  </p>
<p>01:25:50:22 - 01:26:13:14<br>Jamie<br>Times are much they they don't grow at as consistent over rate as they do during the non summer months in Texas. And you're actually going to see that more intraday where like let's say it'll be an afternoon period block times will start to slow as all the miners begin curtailing. That will have a reflexive effect where the fee market.  </p>
<p>01:26:14:03 - 01:26:14:20<br>Marty<br>Jumps up.  </p>
<p>01:26:14:23 - 01:26:34:22<br>Jamie<br>Starts to jump up, and then you'll see this inverse correlation between LNP's and fee markets, where the fees could rise up so much that it actually pushes the LNP of electricity to become attractive to mine. So all this hashrate will come online in response, the rising fee market. So you have this like crazy interplay between pay.  </p>
<p>01:26:34:22 - 01:26:37:16<br>Marty<br>You imagine over time sort of like this, but it'll eventually get to like this.  </p>
<p>01:26:38:11 - 01:26:51:18<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, it will eventually become very efficient. But it's I think you could start to see a long term trend where off peak electricity has materially faster times over a period of entire year than on peak electricity.  </p>
<p>01:26:51:18 - 01:27:02:22<br>Marty<br>What was once the, the BitMEX payout fee spike will turn into. Yeah. Energy price volatility and curtailment. Yeah. This sea spike.  </p>
<p>01:27:02:22 - 01:27:08:02<br>Jamie<br>Elegant intersection of fees and lamps.  </p>
<p>01:27:08:07 - 01:27:14:00<br>Marty<br>Yeah. For those who are unaware like BitMEX, they would do what every Monday morning at 9 a.m. they do payouts or something like that?  </p>
<p>01:27:14:00 - 01:27:15:13<br>Jamie<br>I believe that's correct.  </p>
<p>01:27:15:25 - 01:27:21:23<br>Marty<br>And you could visibly see it on the changes they got. Fees are up, right? Max is paying out all their users.  </p>
<p>01:27:22:21 - 01:27:34:25<br>Jamie<br>Yeah. Uh, I was thinking about that, uh, how far we've come since the that March 2020 BitMEX flash crash.  </p>
<p>01:27:35:07 - 01:27:35:25<br>Marty<br>What does happen?  </p>
<p>01:27:36:00 - 01:27:36:27<br>Jamie<br>Uh, yeah.  </p>
<p>01:27:37:12 - 01:27:38:13<br>Marty<br>Turn the engines off.  </p>
<p>01:27:39:19 - 01:28:10:01<br>Jamie<br>Crazy to think that that Arthur that Bitcoin almost a bitmex was the dominant exchange in terms of liquidity in March of 2020 and they only accepted Bitcoin as collateral and and blocks were full fees were through the roof. Bitcoin crashed over 50% in like a couple of hours overnight. It was trading eight, it was trading 8000 on whatever that period.  </p>
<p>01:28:10:25 - 01:28:24:21<br>Jamie<br>Yes, right around there it's trading 8000 and within a few hours it was trading 3300. And so nobody could get additional collateral into BitMEX because the blocks were so full and the fees were so high.  </p>
<p>01:28:24:22 - 01:28:25:24<br>Marty<br>Some of them were cheap out.  </p>
<p>01:28:26:00 - 01:28:48:09<br>Jamie<br>And all of the collateral that was on there, which was supporting Bitcoin long positions, like if you wanted to buy Bitcoin on BitMEX during that time, you could only post Bitcoin as margin collateral. So your margin collateral was was crashing in value. Nobody could get additional margin call margin collateral in there. So everyone was getting liquidated. Uh, and then Arthur just pulled the plug.  </p>
<p>01:28:49:25 - 01:28:51:27<br>Jamie<br>There was definitely a meeting after they were like, All right.  </p>
<p>01:28:51:27 - 01:28:52:24<br>Marty<br>Guys, as.  </p>
<p>01:28:53:04 - 01:28:54:12<br>Jamie<br>You were, you guys are done?  </p>
<p>01:28:55:04 - 01:28:55:25<br>Marty<br>Yeah Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:28:56:07 - 01:28:58:29<br>Jamie<br>You have to have a US dollar.  </p>
<p>01:28:59:13 - 01:29:12:04<br>Marty<br>I mean, I know people who are running funds that were said, yeah, trading X, right? And they didn't put a high enough fee on their transaction and cannot meet their, their collateral call.  </p>
<p>01:29:12:14 - 01:29:17:08<br>Jamie<br>That was probably the sickest the sickest buying opportunity in the hit in the history of Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:29:17:08 - 01:29:17:21<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>01:29:18:15 - 01:29:27:21<br>Jamie<br>In terms of what was going on in the backdrop from a macro economic perspective, money printing and all of that.  </p>
<p>01:29:28:02 - 01:29:29:12<br>Marty<br>Anything up to a having.  </p>
<p>01:29:29:22 - 01:29:37:04<br>Jamie<br>Into having you. Exactly into a having and you got an opportunity to buy bitcoin at 3500 bucks coin one.  </p>
<p>01:29:37:05 - 01:30:02:05<br>Marty<br>Was I was so Parker and I recorded a podcast with Kyle Bass from him capital literally 5 p.m. before all of this happened. And I think the last question, as Parker said, what's going to happen with Bitcoin? He was like, I don't know just make sure you have your coins in Self-custody Yeah, thank God for Santucci. Let's say about that.  </p>
<p>01:30:02:05 - 01:30:07:16<br>Marty<br>I was like smash buying trout that I was like, Oh shit, 5000, 3500. Like.  </p>
<p>01:30:08:08 - 01:30:13:14<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, I bought a bunch of too. Yeah, it was good. And then people got stimulus.  </p>
<p>01:30:13:23 - 01:30:14:02<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:30:14:09 - 01:30:17:10<br>Jamie<br>So everybody could roll their stimulus into Bitcoin. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:30:18:03 - 01:30:18:23<br>Marty<br>It's crazy time.  </p>
<p>01:30:19:14 - 01:30:32:15<br>Jamie<br>It was. And then a year later meme stock. Uh, with, uh, deep, deep fucking value value.  </p>
<p>01:30:33:05 - 01:30:36:14<br>Marty<br>AMC GameStop. Did you watch the money at.  </p>
<p>01:30:37:06 - 01:30:38:03<br>Jamie<br>No. Is that the.  </p>
<p>01:30:38:13 - 01:30:40:24<br>Marty<br>The movie on it? It's pretty good.  </p>
<p>01:30:41:12 - 01:30:52:26<br>Jamie<br>That was one of the funniest, most fun times of my life. I remember every day just getting up and just like seeing the moves in the markets and the memes flying around on Twitter.  </p>
<p>01:30:53:01 - 01:31:02:29<br>Marty<br>The the meme culture around that time, I think I don't want to say it peaked. Maybe we can get to that level again, but that is the last all time high. I mean, culture is around there.  </p>
<p>01:31:03:05 - 01:31:05:20<br>Jamie<br>I love I'm a big meme culture guy.  </p>
<p>01:31:05:23 - 01:31:08:13<br>Marty<br>Same. It's a it's good for the soul.  </p>
<p>01:31:08:28 - 01:31:09:14<br>Jamie<br>It is.  </p>
<p>01:31:09:21 - 01:31:22:25<br>Marty<br>And it's actually we laugh about it, but I do think it is one of the most potent tools we have to take away power from. These people probably do not deserve it. You need to ridicule these people. Memes are the most effective way ridiculing these people.  </p>
<p>01:31:23:06 - 01:31:39:17<br>Jamie<br>They definitely are. Yeah. And there's nothing that ridicules them more than cryptocurrencies. Based on memes of dogs speaking broken English that are worth tens of billions of dollars.  </p>
<p>01:31:40:18 - 01:31:42:12<br>Marty<br>This bank. Uh.  </p>
<p>01:31:43:01 - 01:31:54:19<br>Jamie<br>No, I don't think bank is worth ten. Doge is worth ten buck doge. Yeah. Yeah. I mean there's there's three dog coins that are worth more than $1,000,000,000.  </p>
<p>01:31:57:19 - 01:31:58:29<br>Marty<br>Bitcoin's worth more than a trillion.  </p>
<p>01:31:58:29 - 01:32:03:19<br>Jamie<br>Now Bitcoin is worth more than a trillion. And guess what? Even our little dog coins are.  </p>
<p>01:32:03:19 - 01:32:04:16<br>Marty<br>Worth more than a billion.  </p>
<p>01:32:04:16 - 01:32:05:25<br>Jamie<br>They're worth more than a billion.  </p>
<p>01:32:07:00 - 01:32:13:00<br>Marty<br>Where do you think this all goes? You optimistic? Cautiously optimistic. Everything. Bitcoin mining.  </p>
<p>01:32:13:18 - 01:32:15:23<br>Jamie<br>Yeah. I'm this. I'm so optimistic.  </p>
<p>01:32:16:06 - 01:32:16:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:32:17:01 - 01:32:17:22<br>Jamie<br>I'm blinded.  </p>
<p>01:32:18:06 - 01:32:44:07<br>Marty<br>I, I have this long running belief that's becoming more hardened by the day that are in order of operations to the success of Bitcoin in the front of the order operations lies in the hands of the mining industry, convincing the energy sector like I do this right, I become extremely more hardened in that belief and more optimistic as time goes on, even though there's still a disconnect and not everybody gets it.  </p>
<p>01:32:44:07 - 01:33:01:06<br>Marty<br>I think people like paving the way and others in the energy sector are beginning to have the lightbulb go off is creating the environment where it can really have this escape velocity. Terms of the acceptance of Bitcoin outside of this bubble that we've been in.  </p>
<p>01:33:02:05 - 01:33:11:22<br>Jamie<br>Definitely, yeah. I mean, so we launched our our flagship financial product last year, which is are our Bitcoin denominated bond.  </p>
<p>01:33:11:25 - 01:33:12:08<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>01:33:12:18 - 01:33:38:25<br>Jamie<br>And we raised just under a thousand Bitcoin. It was a rate D uh, five or six C offering, which is an an SEC registered offering for accredited investors only. The only way you can do lending products with retail is if they're callable and if you have a call. And that's how your, um, that's how you have an asset and liability duration mismatch like Celsius and blockfi had.  </p>
<p>01:33:39:06 - 01:33:57:23<br>Jamie<br>But so we launched this product the Bitcoin liked it a lot. We did it on pretty good terms. It was a venture debt. So you got a bunch of warrants in our company and you get a 10% yield on Bitcoin and you're at the top of our capital stack your first lien over all the assets of the company.  </p>
<p>01:33:58:09 - 01:34:27:07<br>Jamie<br>Um, and you know, the way to think about this is we're taking this Bitcoin, we're turning it into the machines that create Bitcoin and, and that, you know, it's a, it's a very secure form of commodity production finance. It's like borrowing barrels of oil to go and build an oil drilling site and to pay your, your leases and and get your drill rig all set up.  </p>
<p>01:34:27:17 - 01:34:55:10<br>Jamie<br>And so there's nothing like it in commodity production finance because obviously oil has is not transportable. There's tremendous storage costs. There's there's gravity differentials between different types of it's not a fungible commodity. Uh, and natural gas, same thing doesn't work. You could do it with gold. I'm surprised it never existed in gold, but you know, it is what it is.  </p>
<p>01:34:55:13 - 01:34:57:02<br>Marty<br>Because of pretty high storage costs.  </p>
<p>01:34:57:04 - 01:35:19:12<br>Jamie<br>See it? High storage costs, too. Absolutely. But Bitcoin is it's a monetary commodity. It's it's instantly transportable. It's fungible. Uh, you know, there's zero friction in it. And so it is this is a perfect method of commodity production, finance and where I'm going with this shell of my companies.  </p>
<p>01:35:19:25 - 01:35:23:05<br>Marty<br>Yes, I'm happy you brought it up, because that's what I want to end with. Is this.  </p>
<p>01:35:23:06 - 01:35:54:16<br>Jamie<br>Okay, good. But here's here's our kind of big thesis on it. And I tell these people and they so like, All right, cool, buddy is like we said before, Cormann has no customers. Our customer is distributed algorithm, distributed software platform, and occasionally it is individuals who want to pay fees. It's 5% individuals, one of individuals and firms paying fees, 95% a software algorithm.  </p>
<p>01:35:55:09 - 01:36:06:07<br>Jamie<br>That software algorithm is the single largest non-state buyer of electricity in the entire world and growing at at 15 gigawatts.  </p>
<p>01:36:06:16 - 01:36:08:07<br>Marty<br>Approaching 700 x slash.  </p>
<p>01:36:08:21 - 01:36:42:10<br>Jamie<br>999 95% uptime times 16 gigawatts. It's the single largest buyer and most consistent buyer of electricity in the entire world. Bitcoin denominated finance power plants together. If you're converting energy into Bitcoin's bitcoin should be the financing instrument for power plants. And you get those two things together. Now, admittedly, right now it's there's obvious reasons why this is not happening.  </p>
<p>01:36:43:07 - 01:37:08:00<br>Jamie<br>The having is one of them because a power plant amortization schedule, meaning you invest X in CapEx, expect to get your CapEx back in Y years. Y years is about ten years. And you're going to have, depending if you time the cycles perfectly, you're going to have to having during that ten year period, you might even have three if you screw it up, I think.  </p>
<p>01:37:08:12 - 01:37:34:09<br>Jamie<br>Uh, and so if you take a bunch of Bitcoin and use it to buy a power plant and then plug in miners and go through the whole cycle there, during that period, you're going to your Bitcoin denominated revenue is going to go down pretty, pretty materially per unit of hash rate during that time period. And so it becomes hard to align the amortization schedules of the power plant with the mining operation.  </p>
<p>01:37:35:04 - 01:38:06:11<br>Jamie<br>Dogecoin has no having. So it's actually you could probably find its power plant with Dogecoin Dogecoin's denominated debt for it stood show. But obviously the doge market cap is immaterial and it's a it's a significantly worse store value than bitcoin because it has perpetual issuance. There are no halvings. But what's really cool about bitcoin is that in that world where the fee pressure and the fees rise to be more than the subsidy, it mitigates the effect of the having successively.  </p>
<p>01:38:06:11 - 01:38:24:29<br>Jamie<br>And so I think my big prediction in the next decade is people will start to use a little bit of Bitcoin in their cap stack. You know, it would be crazy to not have a power plant, a Bitcoin mine, a little bit of Bitcoin denominated, a little bit of usdc equity, a little bit of USD debt, like that's what the right cap structure looks like.  </p>
<p>01:38:25:08 - 01:38:52:18<br>Jamie<br>Then you have an indiscriminate buyer of energy. You can sell that energy back to the grid anytime you want. If Bitcoin flies around and there's a bunch of volatility, your bitcoin denominated financing piece protects you from that and the revenues in a period where your bitcoin mining revenue goes down expressed in dollars per megawatt hour, your opportunity to optimize power and sell it back to the grid goes up.  </p>
<p>01:38:53:06 - 01:39:22:04<br>Jamie<br>The more that the Bitcoin breakeven goes lower and lower, the more that you would be curtailing your Bitcoin mining load and selling the power back to the grid. So the interaction of these markets where you have a flexible generation stack and a and a flexible Bitcoin mining stack that also has that fee pressure dynamic with block times getting slower, it is all of like it fits together so elegantly and I'm a big that's my big prediction.  </p>
<p>01:39:22:04 - 01:39:26:22<br>Jamie<br>That's my crazy prediction is Bitcoin denominated finance for power generation becomes the thing.  </p>
<p>01:39:26:22 - 01:39:27:27<br>Marty<br>I don't think it's that crazy.  </p>
<p>01:39:28:07 - 01:39:28:27<br>Jamie<br>Yeah I know.  </p>
<p>01:39:28:29 - 01:39:29:22<br>Marty<br>You're good idea.  </p>
<p>01:39:29:22 - 01:39:32:26<br>Jamie<br>You're on the the absolute fringe of.  </p>
<p>01:39:33:01 - 01:39:55:13<br>Marty<br>This is how we get to a type one civilization and you need these Yeah you need these types of and again going back to like the first order of operations in the energy sector being so important think that's the big question is like how do you go from like a dollar reserve system to a Bitcoin reserve system? And like this is part of that process where you basically team up, right?  </p>
<p>01:39:55:21 - 01:40:09:01<br>Marty<br>You have two of the most important tools that humanity, money and energy team up. And then from there you can disconnect from the dollar system and begin to have the Bitcoin standard materialize.  </p>
<p>01:40:09:08 - 01:40:57:13<br>Jamie<br>Here you have a little microgrid. Yeah. Where you have a little a community that's organized around a power plant, a bitcoin mine and and short range transmission infrastructure and you just how you have economically perfect consumption of energy, you have incentives for demand response there. I do think some of the cool things that are happening with residential demand response are are another interesting step in this direction because right now Texas has started to do this a little bit, but it's it's blown up a couple of times where residential consumers can could participate more directly in demand response and you know actively turn off their AC when power prices get high and it would reduce their  </p>
<p>01:40:57:13 - 01:41:29:14<br>Jamie<br>power bill dramatically. Um that but getting the largest consumer largest and most indiscriminate consumer of peak power the residential consumer to be more price sensitive also is a going to be an interesting restoration of free market like real price discriminate free market consumption because right now it's you know you just get your power pass through by your retail electric provider.  </p>
<p>01:41:29:26 - 01:41:53:01<br>Jamie<br>There's not a lot of sensitivity to when you've consumed. It's just a big blended rate that gets distributed out amongst everybody. And that's the reason why the average residential consumer in America pays 16.5%, 16.5 cents a kilowatt hour for power, and the wholesale market is 4 to $0.05, and they're overpaying by a factor of three for their power because there's no price sensitivity on that.  </p>
<p>01:41:53:19 - 01:41:57:22<br>Jamie<br>I think that's also a cool development that that plays really nicely with Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:41:59:20 - 01:42:00:19<br>Marty<br>In terms of.  </p>
<p>01:42:01:04 - 01:42:39:13<br>Jamie<br>In terms of the the way the let's say, the coincidence of supply, demand and price sensitivity all happening in electricity markets right now. Right now you have a lot of dumb electricity market participants, not dumb, but not sophisticated, not savvy. Now you have smart home technology and and that like a tech enabled digitally native power grid where the whole home can respond quickly.  </p>
<p>01:42:39:28 - 01:43:09:09<br>Jamie<br>You know, you're not like honey, you run out to the breaker in the garage and so, you know, open the breaker. It's like, no, the this all the systems are connected to a price feed. And the price feed is ingesting the real time wholesale market electricity cost. And if you are a person who doesn't want to pay a $400 power bill in the summer, you just say, you know, I'm willing to sweat a little bit from 4 to 6 p.m. and that's family sauna time now.  </p>
<p>01:43:09:12 - 01:43:25:06<br>Jamie<br>Yeah, we make we make a thing of it or we have a like a cold plunge or cold pool in the backyard and we have family pool time from 4 to 6 p.m.. Instead of ripping the APS, the AC at the absolute peak of transmission charges and electricity prices on the power grid.  </p>
<p>01:43:25:16 - 01:43:37:09<br>Marty<br>That makes sense. Yeah, that would help obviously service demand in other areas. I'm sure up bitcoin plays into this like the bitcoin miners less incentivized.  </p>
<p>01:43:37:10 - 01:44:13:06<br>Jamie<br>Because the bitcoin miners are already the the inverse of the residential consumer. Yeah. And so what it looks like is you have a power grid that's like it's a bit more reasonably sized. It actually works better with intermittent resource and battery. So in the world that the Inflation Reduction Act gets renewed again and then again and the government endlessly subsidizes the, the development of renewable resources and batteries and they insist that that's the direction that the species go, at least in North America, for our energy needs.  </p>
<p>01:44:13:19 - 01:44:40:26<br>Jamie<br>Then you start to have okay of Bitcoin mining, which is price sensitive, inverse of residential peak demand. You have residential demand response and participation there with a direct and sensitive, a direct incentive for price sensitive electricity. Consumers reduce during the peaks. And so the way it manifests is you don't have a 40,000 megawatt differential between steady state electricity demand on the grid and peak demand.  </p>
<p>01:44:40:26 - 01:44:45:09<br>Jamie<br>You have a much narrower thing and you have more perfect electricity markets. Is the way that that kind of.  </p>
<p>01:44:46:03 - 01:44:49:18<br>Marty<br>That's the goal. Yeah you're late to your call.  </p>
<p>01:44:50:06 - 01:44:51:01<br>Jamie<br>But I am I.  </p>
<p>01:44:51:07 - 01:44:54:17<br>Marty<br>Yeah but I think this is a good place to have No that's.  </p>
<p>01:44:54:17 - 01:44:54:24<br>Jamie<br>Okay.  </p>
<p>01:44:54:28 - 01:44:55:27<br>Marty<br>Very optimistic.  </p>
<p>01:44:56:03 - 01:44:56:24<br>Jamie<br>This is a great chat.  </p>
<p>01:44:57:06 - 01:45:09:01<br>Marty<br>It's always a great chat. I'm happy we're able to obviously record it with Peter, but on this show able to record it for those. Jimmy I go way back to New York. We were both we're both New York refugees living in Texas now.  </p>
<p>01:45:09:02 - 01:45:09:15<br>Jamie<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:45:10:14 - 01:45:12:01<br>Marty<br>Your hair was much shorter back then.  </p>
<p>01:45:12:08 - 01:45:12:18<br>Jamie<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:45:13:10 - 01:45:14:09<br>Marty<br>And you didn't have a beard.  </p>
<p>01:45:14:27 - 01:45:20:26<br>Jamie<br>I was envious of you. And when you moved to Texas all those years ago, I mean, save some for me.  </p>
<p>01:45:21:09 - 01:45:27:10<br>Marty<br>Oh, you came and got yours. You came and got yours. Janie, that is certainly clear. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:45:28:06 - 01:45:30:12<br>Jamie<br>Oh, yeah. Thank you very much for having me. Well.  </p>
<p>01:45:30:25 - 01:45:34:09<br>Marty<br>Thank you for coming around to do this much more. Also, you got to come to Austin more. I know you're West Texas.  </p>
<p>01:45:35:01 - 01:45:37:15<br>Jamie<br>I may actually be getting a place here.  </p>
<p>01:45:37:15 - 01:45:40:26<br>Marty<br>Yeah, get a place here. Yeah, I'm hang out here because I think.  </p>
<p>01:45:42:02 - 01:45:43:19<br>Jamie<br>The way West Texas is great.  </p>
<p>01:45:43:19 - 01:45:45:10<br>Marty<br>Though. That doesn't sound that great.  </p>
<p>01:45:45:13 - 01:46:00:15<br>Jamie<br>I mean, isolation has its benefits. That's true. It's a big, wide open landscape. There's a lot of liberty now here. It feels like there's a lot more rules here than in West Texas.  </p>
<p>01:46:01:17 - 01:46:04:18<br>Marty<br>Yes, a lot less rules compared to New York City, though.  </p>
<p>01:46:04:27 - 01:46:05:16<br>Jamie<br>That is true.  </p>
<p>01:46:05:17 - 01:46:06:19<br>Marty<br>Which is the tradeoff that I'm.  </p>
<p>01:46:06:19 - 01:46:17:13<br>Jamie<br>Willing to make. Fair enough. Good trade. Good trade. But West Texas is some real freedom out there. Yeah, let's agree to do this. Maybe you'll come west a little bit more often and I'll come east for more.  </p>
<p>01:46:17:13 - 01:46:19:23<br>Marty<br>We can make that agreement. I need to get up. Done.  </p>
<p>01:46:19:23 - 01:46:21:11<br>Jamie<br>Sox's done deal. That's a deal.  </p>
<p>01:46:21:22 - 01:46:24:13<br>Marty<br>That's a deal. We're going to have another deal. Peace and love for you.</p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:image href="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/481-James-McAvity.png"/>
      </item>
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Bitcoin Mining State Of The Union | Harry Sudock]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[In this episode of TFTC Marty was joined by Harry Sudock to discuss a variety of topics around Bitcoin, Bitcoin mining, and the broader energy sector, providing valuable insights into the current state and future of these industries.]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode of TFTC Marty was joined by Harry Sudock to discuss a variety of topics around Bitcoin, Bitcoin mining, and the broader energy sector, providing valuable insights into the current state and future of these industries.]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:15:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iobitcoin-mining-state-of-the-union-harry-sudock/</link>
      <comments>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iobitcoin-mining-state-of-the-union-harry-sudock/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qqlksar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7cnfw33k76tw94kkjmnfdenj6um5v96x2tt0vckhg6r9946ku6t0dckksctjwfuj6um4v3hkx6e0qgszsfr2amdk0jnmy5qukevqmspvky4s9j4va50h9xakr9wsv2cs3tgrqsqqqa28cty3dd</guid>
      <category>TFTC Podcast</category>
      
        <media:content url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/480-Harry-Sudock.png" medium="image"/>
        <enclosure 
          url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/480-Harry-Sudock.png" length="0" 
          type="image/png" 
        />
      <noteId>naddr1qqlksar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7cnfw33k76tw94kkjmnfdenj6um5v96x2tt0vckhg6r9946ku6t0dckksctjwfuj6um4v3hkx6e0qgszsfr2amdk0jnmy5qukevqmspvky4s9j4va50h9xakr9wsv2cs3tgrqsqqqa28cty3dd</noteId>
      <npub>npub19qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksn4zc3g</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrib]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/bitcoin-mining-state-of-the-union-harry-sudock/">Read original post</a></p>
<p>In this episode of TFTC Marty was joined by Harry Sudock to discuss a variety of topics around Bitcoin, Bitcoin mining, and the broader energy sector, providing valuable insights into the current state and future of these industries.</p>
<h3><strong>Public Markets and Bitcoin Ideology</strong></h3>
<p>The conversation started with the recent event of Griid (a Bitcoin mining company) going public and how that aligns with Bitcoin's ideology. The public market offers the ability to put shares into many people's hands, which helps decentralize Bitcoin ownership. It also provides access to capital, which is crucial in a capital-intensive business like mining.</p>
<h3><strong>Bitcoin Mining's Maturation</strong></h3>
<p>The mining industry has matured significantly, with home mining and "citadel mining" becoming more prevalent. There's a focus on integrating mining with other use cases like process heat and establishing it as a key player in the energy sector.</p>
<h3><strong>Energy Sector Engagement</strong></h3>
<p>Key figures in the energy sector are actively engaging with Bitcoin mining, recognizing its potential to act as a catalyst for change and maturation of the electric system. The flexibility that Bitcoin mining offers is becoming very clear to energy professionals.</p>
<h3><strong>Hash Rate and Network Security</strong></h3>
<p>Bitcoin's installed hash rate base has reached a level that signifies a strong security model and the increasing utility and value of Bitcoin as a network.</p>
<h3><strong>Mining Industry Trends:</strong></h3>
<p>There's a significant focus on technology that allows mining in harsh environments (like immersion cooling), increasing efficiency, and making more energy sources viable for mining operations.</p>
<h3><strong>ASIC Manufacturers and Competition</strong></h3>
<p>The duopoly of ASIC manufacturers (Bitmain and MicroBT) is strong, but there's room for innovation and new entrants in the market. The conversation touched on the potential for commodification and what that could mean for the industry.</p>
<h3><strong>Bitcoin Halving and Business Preparedness</strong></h3>
<p>As the next Bitcoin halving approaches, miners are focusing on efficiency and cost-consciousness to ensure resilience. The halving is a testament to Bitcoin's predictable monetary policy.</p>
<h3><strong>Impact of Bitcoin ETFs</strong></h3>
<p>The emergence of Bitcoin ETFs has shifted the market dynamics for companies like MicroStrategy and public mining companies, pushing them to differentiate themselves more as businesses rather than just Bitcoin holding entities.</p>
<h3><strong>Geopolitical and Environmental Considerations</strong></h3>
<p>The conversation touched on the geopolitical risks surrounding ASIC manufacturing and the need for energy policies that support stable and sustainable power sources, like nuclear energy.</p>
<h3><strong>The Role of Venture Capital in Bitcoin:</strong></h3>
<p>Marty's and Harry's work at Ten31 focuses on supporting the growth of Bitcoin and its ecosystem by investing in companies that build critical infrastructure and by providing guidance to entrepreneurs in the space.</p>
<h2>Sponsors</h2>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h3>Best Quotes</h3>
<p>"Bitcoin demonetizes the political class and remonetizes the productive class." - Harry</p>
<ul>
<li>This quote highlights the underlying ethos of Bitcoin as an empowering tool for the productive members of society and its potential impact on traditional power structures.</li>
</ul>
<p>"You can't virtue signal your way out of physics." - Harry</p>
<ul>
<li>Harry used this quote to emphasize the practical limitations of transitioning to renewable energy sources without considering the actual energy needs and the role that stable sources like nuclear energy play.</li>
</ul>
<p>"Bitcoin is the longest game we've ever gotten to play." - Harry</p>
<ul>
<li>This quote reflects the long-term vision and commitment required to be part of the Bitcoin ecosystem, acknowledging the ongoing journey toward broader adoption and integration into the financial system.</li>
</ul>
<p>"The future won't build itself." - Harry</p>
<ul>
<li>Harry emphasized the proactive effort required from the Bitcoin community to continue building and innovating within the space, ensuring the network's growth and resilience.</li>
</ul>
<p>"Being a founder or co-founder of an early-stage company can be extremely isolating. And so having some folks in the 'been there, done that' club who can sit alongside you and hold your hand when you're facing the toughest pieces, that's so exciting to me." - Harry</p>
<ul>
<li>Harry discusses the value of mentorship and support within the startup community, particularly in the challenging and fast-paced Bitcoin industry.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>This podcast episode provided a deep dive into the world of Bitcoin mining and its interaction with the energy sector, as well as the role of venture capital in supporting the growth of the Bitcoin ecosystem. The discussion covered a wide range of topics, from the specifics of mining technology to the broader implications of Bitcoin's monetary policy and the market dynamics influenced by new financial products like ETFs.</p>
<p>The overarching message was clear: the Bitcoin mining industry is at a pivotal stage of growth and professionalization, with a strong focus on energy efficiency, technological innovation, and integration with the energy sector. This growth comes with challenges, including regulatory and geopolitical concerns, but also presents tremendous opportunities for those willing to engage with the complexities of this nascent industry.</p>
<p>As we look to the future, the insights and reflections from this episode offer a roadmap for entrepreneurs, investors, and enthusiasts who are part of the Bitcoin journey. The potential for Bitcoin to reshape our understanding of money and energy is immense, and the continued dedication and innovation from the community will be critical in realizing this vision.</p>
<h3>Timestamps</h3>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>7:26 - Big week for Griid<br>11:21 - State of the mining industry<br>15:46 - Industrial adoption<br>19:43 - Demand response<br>23:46 - Energy FUD from the parasitic class<br>31:44 - Future of mining<br>36:06 - Technical innovation<br>37:27 - ASIC manufacturers<br>45:02 - Halvening<br>51:59 - Political influence and pencil making<br>58:27 - ETF and stocks<br>1:02:54 - Ten31 advisor<br>1:08:56 - Wrapping up</p>
<h3>Transcript</h3>
<p>00:00:01:26 - 00:00:03:14<br>Harry<br>I'm good for, like, 90.  </p>
<p>00:00:03:17 - 00:00:26:00<br>Marty<br>All right. You going for 90? Now, the freaks know that we have 90 minutes. We're recording. Harry. We were just trying to determine how long it's been since we last sat down here on TFT to have a discussion for for this audience. Obviously, we've had many conversations outside of TFT between now and the last number recorded here.  </p>
<p>00:00:26:00 - 00:00:30:05<br>Harry<br>But but until it really happen, if the freaks can't hear it.  </p>
<p>00:00:30:08 - 00:00:35:06<br>Marty<br>I don't know. I don't know. Well, luckily.  </p>
<p>00:00:35:09 - 00:00:41:20<br>Harry<br>I have a puppy. There's pepper. Pepper here. We can get a little. Oh.  </p>
<p>00:00:41:22 - 00:00:44:00<br>Marty<br>It's a pepper. You look warm.  </p>
<p>00:00:44:03 - 00:00:49:13<br>Harry<br>Yeah. Not a winter dog needs a winter outfit. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:00:49:15 - 00:01:11:07<br>Marty<br>So a lot has happened. Big week. I mean, maybe we should start there. It's been a big week. Big seven day week, Big, powerful, big last couple of months. Grid getting through the SPAC process. Finally, life in the public markets. We announced last week that you joined 1031 as an advisor and again, a lot has happened since last time we reported.  </p>
<p>00:01:11:07 - 00:01:19:01<br>Marty<br>And today I guess let's start there. What is the week been like and what was the the build up.  </p>
<p>00:01:19:04 - 00:01:58:05<br>Harry<br>To the last. Yeah, I mean the, the, you know, it's the, it's the old saying like, you know, there are weeks when a decade happens and decades when when a week happens and you know for us you know, we didn't we didn't start the business expecting to be a public company in 2018. But that's kind of the road that we ended up on for a lot of reasons and, you know, the reasons why we felt that the public market was the right place for us was was really just, you know, around sort of our Bitcoin ideology and goals, which is that being able to put shares into lots of people's hands and make them available  </p>
<p>00:01:58:07 - 00:02:22:15<br>Harry<br>serves as another vector around getting you know, Bitcoin and hashrate decentralized on an ownership basis. And also it's obviously a high capital intensive business and and where better to do that than in the American public markets? So we're thrilled to be on the other side of the deal. We're thrilled to be Nasdaq listed. And, you know, more than anything on my mind is let's get back to work.  </p>
<p>00:02:22:17 - 00:02:24:22<br>Harry<br>We've got a business to grow.  </p>
<p>00:02:24:25 - 00:02:39:20<br>Marty<br>Yeah, yeah, we all do. It's in the it feels like the timing's perfect a few months before that thing to the winds of a potential bull market seem to be blowing in the distance. Getting closer.  </p>
<p>00:02:39:22 - 00:02:59:06<br>Harry<br>I wake up every day and Bitcoin is more useful than it was the day before. You know, other people are catching on. You know, Pete McCormick and I talked about this a bunch, but like, we're sort of at the you know, the end of the beginning feels like ETF land took us to the end of the beginning or maybe the beginning of the middle.  </p>
<p>00:02:59:08 - 00:03:20:18<br>Harry<br>And that kind of makes sense, right? Like the Internet 15 years end was at the end of the beginning. The big killer apps hadn't sort of emerged. You know, we weren't on 3 billion smartphones yet, but you know, but all of that was sort of yet to come. And I think, you know, in our Bitcoin journey, we're at a similar point where, you know, it's not niche and early anymore.  </p>
<p>00:03:20:21 - 00:03:43:10<br>Harry<br>It might be early in terms of price, but it's not early in terms of of mindshare. You know, Bitcoin is a household name and it's a word that everybody recognizes at this point, you know, for good or for bad, they might have their own, you know, positive or negative association with it. But, you know, but we're not a shadowy corner of the Internet anymore, and that's exciting.  </p>
<p>00:03:43:13 - 00:04:10:06<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it really is. And we just had the Energy and Mining Summit in Nashville and which was hyperfocus on the mining industry, where it is in its maturation phase and where it may be going in the future. And since we have you on in your deep knowledge of the mining sector, particularly here in the United States, I think maybe not to talk about Bitcoin too broadly this, but hone in on Bitcoin mining as an industry.  </p>
<p>00:04:10:12 - 00:04:21:00<br>Marty<br>What has happened over the last two years since we last spoke, where are we now? Where may, may we be going in the next 2 to 3 years?  </p>
<p>00:04:21:02 - 00:04:42:01<br>Harry<br>Yeah, I mean the the, the really great part about what's happened in Bitcoin mining is that the business model, the size and the scale, all of those types of dynamics have gone through maybe an even more aggressive maturation process than Bitcoin has. You know, we're seeing, you know, home miners are doing all sorts of new kinds of things.  </p>
<p>00:04:42:01 - 00:05:05:03<br>Harry<br>We had a panel about, you know, what we call Citadel Mining, which is, you know, everything from one miner in the garage to, you know, one to Steve Barber's hash huts on your property. You know, anything anything that is sort of a homesteading version of mining. And that panel was was fascinating. A ton of discussion around process heat and other sort of integrated use cases.  </p>
<p>00:05:05:05 - 00:05:37:04<br>Harry<br>You know, we've seen, you know, the senator from Tennessee, both senator from Tennessee, actually have engaged really aggressively on Bitcoin and Bitcoin mining. We had the CEO of TVA at the event giving what I found to be, you know, truly a profound discussion of where he thinks energy is going and immediately understood that the role of a flexible consumer and the role of the miner is really a catalyst for change and towards the maturation of our electric system.  </p>
<p>00:05:37:06 - 00:06:01:21<br>Harry<br>You know, that's not a static thing, right? We didn't we didn't wake up with the grid that we had 90 years ago. We've been iterating and improving components of that system all along the way. And so seeing the translation layer between some of them, you know, most senior business experts on the energy side rocking Bitcoin, you know, basically at face value now getting him in a room with miners.  </p>
<p>00:06:01:21 - 00:06:34:01<br>Harry<br>There's a ton of his customers in that room. You know, Grid is one of them, but there are many others. And seeing the clarity that incredible energy professionals are viewing the mining sector with was hugely refreshing. So, you know, all of that is is super, super encouraging. You know, I think the the other macro topic that needs acknowledgment is just that, you know, bitcoin's, you know, installed hash rate base has gotten escape velocity, right?  </p>
<p>00:06:34:01 - 00:07:06:02<br>Harry<br>The whole Bitcoin network is running, you know, somewhere between 15 and 20 gigawatts. It's running 0 to 500 index a hash. You know, we're probably sniffing 600 at this point. The ability for the network to go up, you know, 10% on a difficulty or a hash rate basis from here. You know the the base that we're building off of is now so large that each of these incremental components of growth, you know, we're just talking really big numbers and that's exciting.  </p>
<p>00:07:06:02 - 00:07:32:10<br>Harry<br>It means that the security model for Bitcoin is incredibly strong. It means that the value proposition for sound money that can be transacted on a permissionless and censorship resistant basis is stronger than ever. And the level of professionalism that I get to see you know, both within our company but also across our peers is just really high. I'm really I'm really proud to call them, you know, members of the same you know, the same business community.  </p>
<p>00:07:32:10 - 00:07:40:05<br>Harry<br>So I think all of those things are significantly more mature than they were even the last time we had a conversation on the show.  </p>
<p>00:07:40:07 - 00:08:11:03<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And it was extremely refreshing. The Energy and Mining Summit, the president, CEO of the TVA coming really I was extremely impressed by him. Kids about specifics of what was said. But I will say that his presentation and his earnest curiosity was refreshing from somebody in a position of that type of power where you'd expect them just to be a politician like figurehead of his business and just read the script.  </p>
<p>00:08:11:05 - 00:08:32:28<br>Marty<br>Essentially. He was very engaging and again, genuinely curious, which I was extremely encouraged to find. And then another thing, this whole theme that we're talking about here, it's like one of the questions we get at 1031 quite a bit from prospective investors is we're like, Nobody's adopting Bitcoin. Like, when are people going to start spending it at the store?  </p>
<p>00:08:32:28 - 00:08:58:02<br>Marty<br>When What am I going to be able to go and buy groceries with Bitcoin? And you have to answer that. Yeah. Obviously it's not there that everybody has bitcoin, but I think it's important to realize different types of adoption and the order of operation through which we'll get to bitcoins and state of full success, which is yes, not everybody is able to spend and receive Bitcoin at the grocery store.  </p>
<p>00:08:58:02 - 00:09:23:01<br>Marty<br>However, on the earlier side of the order of operations is this this mining, the distribution of hash rate, this growth of hash rate and integration with the energy sector and the energy sector, I believe has reached a critical tipping point of adoption that is not recognized by the people who just view Bitcoin adoption as where can I spend it, who's accepting it?  </p>
<p>00:09:23:03 - 00:09:45:19<br>Harry<br>Yeah, I think, you know, Bitcoin the currency is it's like saying, where can I spend a barrel of oil or where can I spend a T-bill? Right. Like, that's not the metric that I think is meaningful today. I think all of those, you know, transaction based numbers, you know, numbers and graphs like all of that matters over a longer time scale for sure.  </p>
<p>00:09:45:21 - 00:10:14:15<br>Harry<br>But at the point where we are today, you know, it's about getting Bitcoin onto balance sheets, whether that's household balance sheets or corporate balance sheets or state and government balance sheets. You know, that's the first beachhead that Bitcoin really is is crossing. And I think, you know, we we we got a little bit sort of twisted up in the weeds of it all, you know, earlier on in, you know, in this great shared history of ours.  </p>
<p>00:10:14:15 - 00:10:54:27<br>Harry<br>But, you know, the ability to spend Bitcoin is not the same as the ability to send Bitcoin. And those are different ideas. And so I think we're climbing the store of value adoption curve incredibly constructively. And so it's it's great for us to be able to see that. And I think you're exactly right. The market penetration that Bitcoin mining, you know, is accomplishing today, you know along the lowest sort of strata of energy cost sources, you know, whether that's here in the U.S. or it's abroad, you know, the penetration at those low cost, high opportunity points is enormous.  </p>
<p>00:10:54:29 - 00:11:17:13<br>Harry<br>You know, if you're if you're not thinking about where does Bitcoin mining represent value accrual, if you're, you know, an intermittent generator or if you're a steady baseload generator that needs to manage uptime, anybody who cares about power and uptime should be having a conversation with a Bitcoin miner or be thinking about how do I design a rate class that gets Bitcoin miners?  </p>
<p>00:11:17:13 - 00:11:45:13<br>Harry<br>The prices that they need which are, you know, transparently the bottom of the barrel. But the tradeoff there is that, you know, my father, a lifelong CFO, would always tell me that in any any negotiation you have to pick between price and terms. And I can tell you that on the mining side, we're very firmly in the camp of picking price and taking terms, and that's reared its head in in the demand response adoption that we've represented already.  </p>
<p>00:11:45:13 - 00:12:18:10<br>Harry<br>You know, we do it in the TVA version of that reality. The folks in ERCOT are doing that, and the folks in every power market in the U.S. that has programs that offer, you know, a demand response, compensation kind of rate, class or tariff, you know, everybody wants that. So, you know, the the really interesting thing is to see the ability to deliver on the technical requirements of an actual demand response program and then the desire to expand those programs to increase reliability and lower costs for the average user.  </p>
<p>00:12:18:12 - 00:12:51:02<br>Marty<br>Yeah, just digging into this demand response use case in and of itself, you can already see Bitcoin miners beginning to effect change across different sort of power providers across the country. ERCOT obviously here in Texas, very advanced from the pricing signal perspective, there's API's that are connecting to mining firmware, that mining firmware is reading the pricing signals and adjusting hash rate with those pricing signals almost immediately.  </p>
<p>00:12:51:02 - 00:13:15:04<br>Marty<br>Whereas if you zoom up to the Tier two VA, it's a bit more manual. You get a call from the TVA a day or two before they expect you to turn down during peaks or peaks of demand where they need electricity sent back to the grid and you have somebody go and turn down the operation or do that from a back end software solution.  </p>
<p>00:13:15:07 - 00:13:30:16<br>Marty<br>You could see they're like, you imagine the TVA's looking at ERCOT. You're like, Oh man, look at all that's this demand response system is with all these pricing signals. Maybe if we could build an API pricing service like that for the miners up here, we could be much more efficient.  </p>
<p>00:13:30:18 - 00:13:52:18<br>Harry<br>Yeah, efficiency is the name of the game, right? Like these are these are assets that are already bought and paid for. All the transmission lines are bought and paid for, all the substations are bought and paid for. And so now that the CapEx is out the door for all of these electric systems, how do we get to a place where utilization is able to climb even just a few percentage points?  </p>
<p>00:13:52:21 - 00:14:15:00<br>Harry<br>You know, because at the end of the day, if you think about the you know, I think of sort of the world in terms of a nexus of contracts, there is a contract that your power provider signs with you. The rate payer. I'm sitting in my house like I use Nashville Electric. And, you know, their commitment to me is really around power availability.  </p>
<p>00:14:15:00 - 00:14:51:20<br>Harry<br>So let's say the system gets super stressed and they've got to import power from meso those megawatt hours are incredibly, incredibly expensive and the price of those megawatt hours would be better, you know, as a as a rebate to their flexible load customers rather than a forced import during the time when things are tightest. And so there's a really compelling economic case around why demand response is accretive, you know, both to the power provider as well as to the individual ratepayers at the household level, as well as to the demand response program participants at the industrial scale level.  </p>
<p>00:14:51:20 - 00:15:26:28<br>Harry<br>That's a that's found money for everybody involved, right? The power providers lowering their cost. The ratepayer at the household level is raising their uptime and potentially lowering their cost. And the flexible customer is able to lower their costs as well. So it's this incredible, you know, three party positive sum equation that the power providers are able to offer once they've had the introduction of a truly innovative business model, which all the the mining community believes and rightly so, that they represent with this flexible load type of profile.  </p>
<p>00:15:27:00 - 00:15:51:20<br>Harry<br>And in addition to that, it's better for the generating assets. You don't want to turn those things up and down. You know, as much as you might have to. And so, you know, there's there's this other net benefit over the longer term as you continue into the useful life for some of these plants, which is that operating in an environment with a flexible customer is actually better for all of the hard assets that are being used to generate the electricity in the first place.  </p>
<p>00:15:51:20 - 00:16:20:15<br>Harry<br>So we're in this in incredible virtuous cycle as as symbiotic partners being the power provider, the bitcoin miner, and then the households and businesses that that power provider serves outside of the flexible customer. So I'm incredibly motivated to keep working on what it means to reinvigorate some of these electric systems in a way that that really benefits the entire kind of, you know, nexus of parties.  </p>
<p>00:16:20:17 - 00:16:29:17<br>Marty<br>Harry Versus systemic risk to the system. Did you're not here what the Department of Energy in the EIA I have to say last week.  </p>
<p>00:16:29:20 - 00:16:56:12<br>Harry<br>I understand that that was an interpretation that was floated to the community. I happen to strongly disagree with that interpretation. You know, I think I think that, you know, there's there's sort of a I said this many years ago, but, you know, Bitcoin, you know, demonetized the political class and intact, as is the productive class. And you know, in in keeping with that theme, you know, the the engineers will inherit the earth.  </p>
<p>00:16:56:14 - 00:17:15:23<br>Harry<br>And so that means the power engineers that work on these systems, the people with their boots on the ground. You know, there's I just found this out. I looked at like, what are some of the highest compensated roles that you could have in America? Because I was just I was just curious. One of the weird ones I don't know about that, that maybe I should have kind of to school for.  </p>
<p>00:17:15:26 - 00:17:39:02<br>Harry<br>One of them is there's a guy whose job it is or woman whose job is to hang out of a helicopter on, you know, basically a tether with a chainsaw to manage trees on the high voltage lines, super high up in the air. They make like 400 grand a year. And so those are the people who I think we're building, you know, Bitcoin mining for because we make all of those roles easier.  </p>
<p>00:17:39:04 - 00:18:06:22<br>Harry<br>You know, if that takes an education process in Washington in order to make that value proposition clear, you know, so be it. But I think that, you know, once you once you put the hard data, you know, to these folks, I think the case for Bitcoin is really quite an obvious one. You know, the ideological challenge that we might face is the the sort of baseline assumption, which is that, you know, nobody likes our pet rock.  </p>
<p>00:18:06:25 - 00:18:13:16<br>Harry<br>And I think we're really facing more of that perspective than any sort of legitimate concern around electric reliability.  </p>
<p>00:18:13:18 - 00:18:19:27<br>Marty<br>Yeah, Bitcoin has no no value. It's just a Ponzi scheme, a pet rock. If you will. I don't know. Not helping.  </p>
<p>00:18:19:29 - 00:18:24:21<br>Harry<br>Seems like a lot of market participants who are willing to pay $43,000 a coin right now.  </p>
<p>00:18:24:23 - 00:18:49:17<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it think they think it's valuable. Their parting dollars to get parting with dollars to get bitcoin. But it is like a we discussed this too on our panel the first day of the summit. But it is like you said, we have this sort of pull between the productive class and the unproductive class. The parasitic class probably more descriptive what they actually are right now.  </p>
<p>00:18:49:17 - 00:19:21:12<br>Marty<br>And it's not just specific to Bitcoin. I mean, we zoom out and focus on energy more broadly. Like we talked about the example of this wasn't on our panels, the what Bitcoin Did episode, the live episode on day one in Germany, it's like over 20 years they decommissioned, I think 20 gigawatts worth of nuclear power generation more than doubled their overall capacity generation capacity over the first 20 years of the century, but they doubled their capacity with wind and solar predominantly.  </p>
<p>00:19:21:19 - 00:19:57:13<br>Marty<br>Turns out the sun doesn't shine that much in Germany and the wind doesn't blow as much as they like it to. And so you had a situation in 2002 where nuclear, coal, natural gas were a 86% of the overall generation capacity. Today it's something like 34%. And Germany's got a systemic energy crisis because they don't have reliable power, because they refuse to, for some reason or another, lean into reliable energy sources and say what you will about coal and natural gas and whether or not you think hydrocarbons are here to stay or on the way out.  </p>
<p>00:19:57:13 - 00:20:08:14<br>Marty<br>I mean, nuclear is a very obvious answer to a lot of these energy stability problems that the governments of the world seem to be neglecting for some reason or another.  </p>
<p>00:20:08:15 - 00:20:30:08<br>Harry<br>You can't you can't virtue signal your way out of physics, Right? It just you can't. And and, you know, that's that's just you know, for the climate folks out there, like that's the that's the bitter pill. Right. You're not going to you're not going to build enough wind and solar to solve this in any kind of meaningful way.  </p>
<p>00:20:30:14 - 00:20:53:20<br>Harry<br>And and, you know, the the cohort that drives me kind of the craziest are the ones who are who are staunch climate supporters who believe in the decommissioning of nuclear plants. Right. The these are assets that are fully bought and paid for. They're operating really, really well. They have an incredible safety track record. It's an American technology, nonetheless, that that we were able to innovate on.  </p>
<p>00:20:53:22 - 00:21:20:09<br>Harry<br>And and, you know, the willing the willing sort of voluntary shut off of of these plants, it's just it's despicable. You know, there's there's really there's really no argument for it. So, you know, the playbook that we expect to see and I'm thrilled to say that the Canadian the Canadian folks have are committing to extending useful life at some of their plants.  </p>
<p>00:21:20:12 - 00:21:40:10<br>Harry<br>There's folks at OPG who are committed to building a similar ours, and they're going to do that in TVA. That's public knowledge. So, you know, we are seeing, you know, in California, we were able to avoid, you know, the shutdown of their nuke that's in the in the Los Angeles area. You know, so we're we're starting to turn this tide a little bit.  </p>
<p>00:21:40:10 - 00:22:02:27<br>Harry<br>But, you know, any time you got to turn an aircraft carrier, which is, you know, really the nuclear Regulatory Commission, you know, it's it's a it's a challenge. But but, you know, by gosh, we're going to do it. So I think there is some daylight and some hope on this. But, you know, the the argument that we should shutter nuclear plants is like the single most asinine policy perspective I can think of.  </p>
<p>00:22:03:00 - 00:22:14:01<br>Marty<br>That's literally suicidal, especially if you're going to virtue signal about transitioning away from hydrocarbons and at the same time decommissioning.  </p>
<p>00:22:14:01 - 00:22:39:02<br>Harry<br>Which too, to be fair, like we're we're in favor of building a positive sun electric system. For us, that's meant a huge allocation to hydroelectric assets and raising the revenue profile that they're able to offer. It's it's a huge focus on nuclear, which we love. And and, you know, and there's there's really a you can do well and do good at the same time.  </p>
<p>00:22:39:09 - 00:22:56:28<br>Harry<br>You don't have to you don't have to not have it both ways. But unless you're invest ing in the baseload profile of the electric system, you know you're going to create instability and tail risk that that really will that really will be, you know, significantly detrimental at some point down the road.  </p>
<p>00:22:57:00 - 00:23:10:27<br>Marty<br>Yes. Oh, God, I'm getting triggered. Just thinking of the the LNG export ban or new contract construction of a new LNG export facility ban that came out a couple of weeks ago.  </p>
<p>00:23:10:28 - 00:23:34:11<br>Harry<br>It's well and and you know, and let's let's put our let's put our carbon accounting hats on. Right. If you're if you're replacing a coal asset with a natural gas asset, your carbon intensity of that transition and is incredibly positive, it just happens to run on another hydrocarbon, but a much better one from the carbon accounting perspective. So I think, you know, we we need to be very, very realistic about the physics.  </p>
<p>00:23:34:16 - 00:23:56:22<br>Harry<br>We need to create the demand for these types of flexible load consumers, which means innovating on the contract structure in many of the jurisdictions that are, you know, that are currently not set up to compensate flexible loads as fully as maybe they should be, you know, but these are these are the tough the tough questions and the hard steps that have to be taken.  </p>
<p>00:23:56:24 - 00:24:15:00<br>Harry<br>And, you know, environmental stewardship and strong business performance are not at odds with each other. We just need, you know, sane, cool engineering heads to come together and design solutions that are that are as future proof as possible and shuttering nuclear reactors is the lowest thing you could possibly do on that list. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:24:15:02 - 00:24:49:10<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Very Malthusian when you think about it. But on this trip, I mean, we had this discussion and it was really interesting to see people from different parts of the world come to Nashville to talk about the future of mining and where it may proliferate moving forward. What are your views like? Obviously, the United States, Texas, Tennessee, TVA in Kentucky, other parts, Georgia have really benefited from the Chinese mining exodus that happened a few years ago, two and a half years ago.  </p>
<p>00:24:49:10 - 00:25:14:19<br>Marty<br>Now, at this point, Rackspace is tight. It seems that Bitcoin in the minds of institutions is now go. You got the black rocks of the world saying it's a good thing. And what I've been able to glean is that there are people in other parts of the world that are looking at Bitcoin mining specifically and saying, All right, it's time for us to develop a strategy, deploy some capital and get some hashrate spending up within our borders.  </p>
<p>00:25:14:19 - 00:25:22:17<br>Marty<br>How do you see this international competition for hashrate playing out moving forward?  </p>
<p>00:25:22:19 - 00:25:42:12<br>Harry<br>Yeah, I think, you know, to to win in the mining business, you need to have a structural defensible advantage and that that can come in many forms. I think in America we've got two great structural advantages, one of which are our capital markets, which are the best in the world. The other is that our energy assets are also world class.  </p>
<p>00:25:42:15 - 00:26:02:04<br>Harry<br>And so what are the two key ingredients to a great mining business as well? Capitalized access to energy and so I think the U.S. has has taken a leadership role on the heels of the China the China ban, you know, several years ago. I don't expect us to slow down, you know, maybe on a percentage share basis we're going to lose ground.  </p>
<p>00:26:02:04 - 00:26:23:27<br>Harry<br>But I don't think we're going to you know, I don't think we're going to slow whatsoever. You know, I'm very curious to see what's going to happen in some of these, you know, really sort of oil state wealth environments where there's obviously huge amount of capital available to them because they they've made so much money over the past years and they're starting to look down this diversity path for their portfolios.  </p>
<p>00:26:24:00 - 00:26:51:07<br>Harry<br>And, you know, additionally, they've got access to a huge amount of of incredibly cost effective generation. You know, the US is turning on nuclear reactors and a multi gigawatt solar plant co-located with them. So that's a huge you know, that's a huge opportunity to monetize via the deployment of hashrate. We've seen what Marathon's doing over there. Obviously we've heard the news out of Oman, we've heard the news, you know, in, you know, Dubai and elsewhere.  </p>
<p>00:26:51:09 - 00:27:13:27<br>Harry<br>So, you know, I think then none of that's to say anything about South America which has been involved in this, both, you know, above board and below board. There's sort of a gray market environment. You know, historically in Venezuela, we're seeing large scaled operators operating out of Paraguay. Now we're seeing the Africa trend that grid loss is really spearheading take root.  </p>
<p>00:27:13:27 - 00:27:40:22<br>Harry<br>So I think, you know, the exciting part is that the decentralization of mining, you know, that narrative is very strong because there are structural opportunities to monetize energy in each of these regions. There's an opportunity to, you know, to deploy capital in each of these regions. And there's going to be companies and individuals with a very broad range of risk appetite and operating model appetite to deploy across all of this.  </p>
<p>00:27:40:22 - 00:27:46:09<br>Harry<br>And so, you know, all of it all of it means that, you know, we're probably going to see hash rate go up over time.  </p>
<p>00:27:46:11 - 00:28:11:14<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Then you combine this with the fact that you have hydro boxes and liquid cooling immersion systems becoming more advanced and you have the ability for the first time at scale to deploy hashrate in areas of the world like the Middle East where it was simply impossible due to the physical environment, the heat, specifically even down here in Texas to some extent, like obviously we have a.  </p>
<p>00:28:11:16 - 00:28:12:02<br>Harry<br>Does a.  </p>
<p>00:28:12:02 - 00:28:34:00<br>Marty<br>Lot of hash rate here and a lot of salt, a lot of dust. But the the industry, the picks and shovels, part of the industry building these facilities that allow you to mine in harsh environments has reached a point of maturation as well, where it's really going to open up markets that were previously inaccessible, inaccessible.  </p>
<p>00:28:34:02 - 00:28:49:01<br>Harry<br>Totally. Yeah. There's there's a technology trend that sits underneath all of this. And, you know, on the one hand, it's the efficiency  </p>
<p>00:30:30:28 - 00:30:53:00<br>Marty<br>So little audio troubles. They're back at it. What were we're talking about?  </p>
<p>00:30:53:00 - 00:31:16:08<br>Harry<br>Yes, there's. There's two layers of technical innovation that are happening that I think are going to facilitate broader availability of deployment environments. One of them is that the chips are getting more efficient. And so that just means the units of energy per unit of of hash rate produced over time, you're able to produce, produce more hashes per unit of energy.  </p>
<p>00:31:16:10 - 00:31:43:21<br>Harry<br>The second is all of the technology that's wrapped around that, which includes things like immersion and things like hydro and, and you know, filtration and all the different tools that are available to a mining operator in order to deploy in a harsher environment makes, you know, more sources of generation and more environments available. It means that there's more, you know, economic viability of places that weren't from an operational perspective, but maybe were from a power cost perspective.  </p>
<p>00:31:43:21 - 00:32:03:15<br>Harry<br>Historically. So all of this kind of rolls into the idea that I think is is the tailwind that we're all riding, you know, across Bitcoin, which is more decentralization is likely because, you know, more remote operations are viable. But then secondarily, just the gross hash rate securing the network is going to go up as well.  </p>
<p>00:32:03:18 - 00:32:37:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah, let's let's lean into the ac-dc manufacturers. What are your thoughts on the duopoly, the dominated duopoly by Bitmain? Obviously they've got the S21 series coming to market. They're pricing out of the gate with those machines was very aggressive, many so-called as an attempt to leverage their economies of scale to box potential competitors out of the market. Micro T is it just obviously the second largest player in the market and they have a lot of happy customers.  </p>
<p>00:32:37:16 - 00:32:57:04<br>Marty<br>How do you see this playing out moving into the future? Is Bitmain just using their economies of scale to box people out as micro bitty, beginning to make inroads with larger customers to be seen? Intel come back to the market. Avalon Do any of these companies have a chance of competing?  </p>
<p>00:32:57:07 - 00:33:16:26<br>Harry<br>Look, I think I think that we're still early days. I think that, you know, the manufacturing landscape could change dramatically over time. You know, I think right now Bitmain is sort of winning the day, as they have been for the last couple of years. I think MakerBot is doing a great job. The micro units, you know, are awesome.  </p>
<p>00:33:16:28 - 00:33:41:16<br>Harry<br>They continue to double down on reliability and performance at the cost of some nominal efficiency, which I think has been, you know, a great strategy from them. You know, you've obviously seen riot roll into market with a huge amount of future order. And so I think that, you know, my committee is certainly earning their scale volumes as well.  </p>
<p>00:33:41:19 - 00:34:03:16<br>Harry<br>You know, do I think the duopoly is going to break in the next year? Not particularly. Do I hope that more competitive players enter the market always right. I always want a more competitive market to be able to look at when I think about, you know, capital allocation and hash allocation. But I think that, you know, right now things are, you know, reasonably healthy and competitive.  </p>
<p>00:34:03:18 - 00:34:24:28<br>Harry<br>You know, what we're not seeing this cycle is kind of the price blowout that we saw in 2021 with units trading, you know, significantly ahead of kind of, you know, the future revenue profile. So I think, you know, we're certainly healthier than we were a few years ago, but I'd always love to see additional players enter. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:34:25:00 - 00:34:54:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I would agree there. Yeah, it is crazy how efficient these machines are getting talent and think through my mind like the whole concept of a commodification. Like is that simply a natural catalyst for more competition? When you get to a level where you can make an investment, a capital outlay in building an asset because you're confident that it's not going to make a step function efficiency improvement like the A6 have in the past?  </p>
<p>00:34:54:29 - 00:35:01:29<br>Marty<br>Or does that simply allow the incumbents to just really dominate the market? Um, yet to be seen.  </p>
<p>00:35:01:29 - 00:35:28:14<br>Harry<br>But yeah, yeah, I think, you know, the good news is they don't let me program any of the chips but at least at least not yet. And if they do we have real problems. So you know I think I think there's I think there's sort of the mad scientist and deep technical experts that are working on it. You know, I got to spend some time with Scott from from oh, good Lord, I've lost the name of his project.  </p>
<p>00:35:28:16 - 00:35:33:14<br>Harry<br>But he's doing the open source basic project now.  </p>
<p>00:35:33:14 - 00:35:37:06<br>Marty<br>Future but future. Not that they're not open source.  </p>
<p>00:35:37:08 - 00:36:01:23<br>Harry<br>Hold on. I can find this. He Yeah. So he's working on some open source pieces. You know, I don't think transparently that it's that it is any bit ax I apologize. Scott You know, it's just cool to see people working on stuff and tinkering and innovating along this. You know, we aren't at the mature phase for this industry.  </p>
<p>00:36:01:23 - 00:36:23:15<br>Harry<br>You know, we don't have the you know, we don't have the the, you know, the intel chip or that or the HP. You know, you know, Chip is an intel chip that's in all of those units. But we haven't reached the full commodification layer. We might be at what I view as a long local maximum, which is really sort of the duopoly continuing to innovate.  </p>
<p>00:36:23:17 - 00:36:44:27<br>Harry<br>But we may see, you know, another really interesting breakthrough from a market dynamics perspective that attracts additional folks who want to build down this development path. You know, but unlike software, you don't get to put a software release out every two weeks. You know, it's really, you know, six, 12, 18 month type of time scale to be able to innovate on hardware.  </p>
<p>00:36:45:00 - 00:36:51:16<br>Harry<br>And so, you know, I'm very curious to see what emerges, you know, really over the coming decade, if I'm being honest about timeline.  </p>
<p>00:36:51:18 - 00:36:55:07<br>Marty<br>Yeah, the hash wars are upon us. Who knows?  </p>
<p>00:36:55:09 - 00:36:57:14<br>Harry<br>This could be always has been.  </p>
<p>00:36:57:17 - 00:37:26:01<br>Marty<br>They have been since January 3rd, 2009. Then you have just external factors, geopolitical risk. Who knows what happens in Taiwan with TSMC? Can they spin up foundry here in the United States fast enough to deter any systemic political risks that would come if China were to do something there? Then even then, many people are like TSMC is one of the greatest revenue drivers within Taiwan's.  </p>
<p>00:37:26:01 - 00:37:50:22<br>Marty<br>So to think that China would just come or prevent that company from accruing tax revenues by selling their goods to market is a bit crazy as well. But these are unknowns that that can affect the market. It's crazy to think the range of effects. While we were in Nashville, the weather was affecting Bitcoin rate. Yeah, weather down south produced a -4%.  </p>
<p>00:37:50:22 - 00:38:14:24<br>Marty<br>Difficulty adjustment 3.9% due to everybody engaging demand response. And that's why I mean, I'm sure I know that you feel this way too. It's just I don't think there's a more exciting industry to be in than Bitcoin mining right now because of all these different variables you have to think about. It's certainly very masochistic as well, but it's never boring.  </p>
<p>00:38:14:26 - 00:38:38:17<br>Harry<br>And it's honest, right? Like what I love most about mining is that, you know, I can't make my terror hash our, you know, you know, I'm not going to do I'm not going to outsell my, you know, competitor for the next software sales deal and, you know, sell $9 a seat for, you know, you know, for 12 months, you know, because I've got a better, you know, CRM product in market, right?  </p>
<p>00:38:38:17 - 00:39:05:03<br>Harry<br>Like, no, it's a it's a pure, honest capitalist endeavor to be able to generate hashes more efficiently than the next person. And that's that's a really refreshing environment to build a company into because you can see on a daily basis, if you're doing it the right way, you get a report card, you know, on a very, very frequent basis, which is fun and is very, very motivating.  </p>
<p>00:39:05:05 - 00:39:22:05<br>Harry<br>So I love that part of it. I agree with you there. You know, there's no sector that, you know, I'd be more excited to be working in. It'll be my five year anniversary at Grid next week. Official start date anniversary. I was wrapping a consulting agreement before I joined, so I really started, you know, three or four months before that.  </p>
<p>00:39:22:05 - 00:39:35:13<br>Harry<br>But, you know, but, you know, this is what I've chosen to dedicate my life to, to building, you know, within within a proof of work system and really couldn't be couldn't be happier to get to work on this every day.  </p>
<p>00:39:35:15 - 00:39:59:11<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Got as many wraps. I want to take this on, I guess, since this is a mining focused podcast obviously the having it's about 75 days away which is not that much time. What should miners be doing? What are miners doing to prepare for the having how may it affect mining businesses?  </p>
<p>00:39:59:13 - 00:40:30:23<br>Harry<br>Well, you know, the the the known effect is that the block subsidy is going to get cut in half. I you know, it's bittersweet, right? Like on the one hand, you know we're going to earn less bitcoin as miners unless fees do something quite dramatic than we did the day before. The having happens or the or the block before the having happens is the case really is, you know, but that's the better that the suite is that bitcoins monetary policy gets proven every four years.  </p>
<p>00:40:30:26 - 00:41:10:02<br>Harry<br>So every 210,000 blocks. You know the the the Bitcoin Fed meets and agrees on a new issuance decision and that issuance decision happens programmatically. And so being able to watch the monetary policy happen in real time and with and with, you know, near absolute certainty is one of the most high impact pieces of how Bitcoin works. And getting to see it work in real time is is, you know, is a powerful and meaningful thing that, you know, that's my that's my ideological answer.  </p>
<p>00:41:10:02 - 00:41:33:19<br>Harry<br>But, you know, tactically, I think we've seen a lot of miners across the industry start to roll into higher efficiency machines. I think that's one way to sort of having proof your, you know, your operation is to continue to to invest into the fleets efficiency. Beyond that, you know, we we at least think all the time about, you know, the best way to be prepared for the having is to be cost conscious.  </p>
<p>00:41:33:21 - 00:42:07:10<br>Harry<br>And that starts with the power cost. It really rolls across everything that business spends money on. And so being, you know, laser focused on downside risk and cost is the best tool, you know, available in conjunction with with, you know, managing the fleets efficiency in order to be resilient across a reduction in potential revenue. Now, the purchasing power under the last epoch was greater from a mining revenue perspective than, you know, the purchasing power in the 12.5 Bitcoin block epoch.  </p>
<p>00:42:07:13 - 00:42:46:27<br>Harry<br>And so, you know, we may see a similar dynamic play out across the four years after 75 days from now. So, you know, I think there's there's still a lot of, you know, dynamic components of the market. We haven't even gotten into the expected fee revenues that we might see with additional adoption or additional JPEG degeneracy. However, however you however you might however you might think of it, but at the end of the day, block space is scarce and Bitcoin is an incredible asset to move from point A to point B, And so the fees that folks are willing to pay to move their UTX so I think is a place where, you know, a  </p>
<p>00:42:46:27 - 00:43:12:11<br>Harry<br>huge amount of value is provided by miners securing the movement and the availability of that scarce block space. So, you know, it's a it's a it's a simple topic because the monetary policy is dead simple thanks to Satoshi Knott-craig and and it's also a very complex business operating environment because there's a bunch of moving variables. So it really is a three body problem between fees.  </p>
<p>00:43:12:13 - 00:43:28:20<br>Harry<br>Bitcoin price and network hash rate. So you're you're you're managing a lot of uncertainty around that period of time. But, you know, we pride ourselves to sort of always be having and so, you know we'll start preparing for the having after this one the moment this one happens.  </p>
<p>00:43:28:23 - 00:43:59:08<br>Marty<br>Always be having sage advice That is the environment leading up to this having is different than the two that I've been a part of since I've been following Bitcoin because you have this fee pressure from the JPEGs and all that and it's nothing too crazy right now, but it they get crazier. Oh, that a little under a year ago and at times throughout the last year did provide significant revenues to mining operations.  </p>
<p>00:43:59:08 - 00:44:40:13<br>Marty<br>The price is up 150% since January of last year and it seems like we're hovering in the low forties. The g BTC bleeding seems to be coming to a slow and the ETFs seem to be net buyers of Bitcoin right now potentially into the future. Like is there a situation where fees are pumping, the price is doing really well, they have incomes and you know the situation where it's not as I think cataclysmic is the right word, but it's not a it's not an event that's detrimental to as many operations as it has been in the past.  </p>
<p>00:44:40:20 - 00:44:43:27<br>Marty<br>Something people should be thinking about.  </p>
<p>00:44:43:29 - 00:45:16:04<br>Harry<br>Yeah, I mean, look, like we had we basically had to having last time because we saw price go from whatever, 6500 to 3500 a month and a half before that. And then we bounced back up and then we have so, you know, you can, you can kind of get to having economics multiple different ways. And so if you're not built to be resilient across those different cycles, it's going to be challenging regardless of if it means price getting cut in half or block subsidy getting it cut in half, you know, it's kind of all the same, you know, the same net net from the miners perspective.  </p>
<p>00:45:16:04 - 00:45:48:06<br>Harry<br>So, you know, it's it's going to be dynamic. It's going to be interesting. There's going to be a lot of conversation around it. It's critical to remember that it is beautiful to watch Bitcoin's monetary policy happen algorithmically without you know, without a central, you know, central planner involved. And, you know, and and it's about it's about, you know, survival and putting yourself in a position to be able to thrive, you know, during periods of really constructive mining economics.  </p>
<p>00:45:48:09 - 00:45:54:10<br>Marty<br>First, having where Bitcoin stock to flow would be higher than gold. I wonder if that's some emetic for red.  </p>
<p>00:45:54:10 - 00:45:57:09<br>Harry<br>Dot blue dot green dot.  </p>
<p>00:45:57:11 - 00:46:00:24<br>Marty<br>Is that the is that the ones that they're like oh.  </p>
<p>00:46:00:24 - 00:46:03:22<br>Harry<br>People plan B it's the plan B dots.  </p>
<p>00:46:03:25 - 00:46:06:11<br>Marty<br>Yes we're going all the way up to orange.  </p>
<p>00:46:06:13 - 00:46:08:11<br>Harry<br>And red dot.  </p>
<p>00:46:08:13 - 00:46:28:29<br>Marty<br>Now it is this something as simple as oh people are like wait a second, Bitcoin is now officially more scarce. Some gold from a supply inflation rate that people are like, Oh man, maybe I should get this is 2024 is an interesting year. Another beautiful thing of the halvings they line up perfectly with U.S. presidential election cycles and this one for now.  </p>
<p>00:46:29:05 - 00:46:36:07<br>Harry<br>Unless we have a lot of accelerating or decelerating difficulty adjustments, we could fall of whack. But I don't think we are likely to.  </p>
<p>00:46:36:09 - 00:47:06:03<br>Marty<br>Know that this will be. I mean, we don't like to get political too much on this show, but this seems like it could be a pivotal election for the Bitcoin industry broadly, but specifically the mining industry. It seems like, again, the actions from the EIA last week were dictated down from Elizabeth Warren in a certain capacity, and it seems like this current administration really does not like Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:47:06:05 - 00:47:27:19<br>Marty<br>And I think that's what a lot of people are asking themselves behind closed doors is Dan like, do we need a new administration to just let this industry run then? Do you think back to Trump's first term, if it does turn out to be Trump first byte in which it seems like that is the case? I mean, he wasn't really supportive of Bitcoin either.  </p>
<p>00:47:27:19 - 00:47:56:20<br>Marty<br>Yet Steve mentioned, as is Treasury secretary, you hated Bitcoin. Trump explicitly said that Bitcoin was a threat to the US dollar reserve system. And so even though we don't like having to deal with the political part of life here in the United States as an industry, I think it is becoming abundantly clear that we do have to play the game to some extent just so that they will leave us alone as much as possible.  </p>
<p>00:47:56:22 - 00:48:19:00<br>Harry<br>My Yeah, I'm with you. You know, politics is definitely not my bag, but, you know, the the the goal that I have, I'm always happy to engage with anyone and everyone on this stuff, you know? And and all I want to do is, is, you know, tell them, don't ask me the questions. Ask the people we buy the power from.  </p>
<p>00:48:19:02 - 00:48:44:02<br>Harry<br>What do we do for the community? Are we good? Are we net benefit or you know, are we an asset. I'll never forget the you know, we had a quote from one of the CEOs of the local utility that we, you know, have an operation at. And it was right when inflation was was peaking at 10%. And he called us and he said, you know, when this kind of stuff happens, I'm really left with a couple of choices.  </p>
<p>00:48:44:04 - 00:49:12:17<br>Harry<br>I can sell bonds raised that I can raise rates, I can lower quality of service, or I can go find a Bitcoin miner to bring to my area. Those are the only ways that he had in his mind to fight inflation. And he said of those four options, he would vastly, vastly prefer option four, where there's a differentiated customer that he can recruit to sell power to.  </p>
<p>00:49:12:19 - 00:49:37:25<br>Harry<br>And so it's telling stories like that as many times as we need to to make people understand that, you know, we're not parasites that are that are, you know, suckling on the lifeblood of the American electric system in the economy. We're an asset that pays revenue and that generates, you know, flexible, sustainable load that is an asset to every electric system that we enter so long as the contracts are structured the right way.  </p>
<p>00:49:38:03 - 00:50:10:05<br>Harry<br>And so what that means for us is we just want more flexibility and more credit, both financial and social and political, for the flexibility that we offer. And I don't think that's an unreasonable perspective to take. And we're definitely seeing, you know, a lot of of serious consideration around that value proposition taken up by the technocrats who the actual, you know, generation transmission and delivery services that keep all of our lights on.  </p>
<p>00:50:10:07 - 00:50:12:24<br>Harry<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:50:12:27 - 00:50:18:10<br>Marty<br>Sometimes they have to take a step back because it's so obvious to us. It's like, how do you know? Do you want to see this?  </p>
<p>00:50:18:10 - 00:50:23:19<br>Harry<br>Well, Marty, how do you manufacture a pencil?  </p>
<p>00:50:23:21 - 00:50:25:18<br>Marty<br>It takes many moving parts.  </p>
<p>00:50:25:21 - 00:50:45:28<br>Harry<br>No idea. I've no idea. When I go pick up a pencil, I have no idea how that was made. I assume that the vast majority of people I will ever talk to have the same level of understanding of how the manufacturing process for a pencil works that I that that they do with what happens when you turn the light switch on.  </p>
<p>00:50:46:00 - 00:51:15:09<br>Harry<br>Yeah, right. It's a it's an unknown thing, you know. No, you know I, you know, my, my dad believes that he's reducing, you know, the carbon intensity of our household by turning the thermostat down a degree or two in the summer or in the winter. Right. So like the level of understanding and the level of, of, you know, transparency, you know, he doesn't think that way anymore because I've, you know, locked him in a room and yelled about it long enough.  </p>
<p>00:51:15:11 - 00:51:37:29<br>Harry<br>But, you know, but these are these are topics that are not taught to us as young people. They're they're topics that are wildly esoteric for the vast majority of people, you know, certainly in America, not on planet Earth, nobody knows what happens or why their light switch works. And so that's the that's the fight that I that I'm excited to take on, which is I don't believe that.  </p>
<p>00:51:38:02 - 00:52:04:27<br>Harry<br>Look, I didn't go to school for electrical engineering. I went to school for Keynesian economics. And I somehow shook loose of that of that horrible fate. And and so if I can learn how the electric system works, I have no technical background whatsoever. But I read a bunch of books and asked a lot of dumb questions and and arrived at something approximating a level one understanding of how electricity works in America.  </p>
<p>00:52:05:00 - 00:52:07:06<br>Harry<br>It isn't that hard.  </p>
<p>00:52:07:08 - 00:52:29:01<br>Marty<br>Now that I seriously been thinking about this reason, like we need in terms of curriculum, like people should know money works and people should know how energy works. Like that should be high school classes mandatory, know how your money works, know how your energy systems work because they are the best base layer of the economy. They're going to go out in the world and try to be productive in.  </p>
<p>00:52:29:03 - 00:52:30:07<br>Marty<br>And the fact that I.  </p>
<p>00:52:30:11 - 00:52:38:13<br>Harry<br>I swear I didn't set you up for this, but but Grid's mission statement is to to build a generational company at the intersection of energy and money.  </p>
<p>00:52:38:15 - 00:52:39:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:52:39:18 - 00:52:49:12<br>Harry<br>It's that's our goal. Our goal is to build a company that sits right on that street corner. Energy going this way, money going that way. Right on the corner is grid and Bitcoin mining.  </p>
<p>00:52:49:15 - 00:52:53:17<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it's happening. It's going to be a long journey. Not for grid.  </p>
<p>00:52:53:18 - 00:52:54:03<br>Harry<br>For young man.  </p>
<p>00:52:54:03 - 00:52:54:20<br>Marty<br>All of us.  </p>
<p>00:52:54:20 - 00:52:56:12<br>Harry<br>For young men.  </p>
<p>00:52:56:14 - 00:53:00:09<br>Marty<br>And you see this airline, it's it's not getting any it's not.  </p>
<p>00:53:00:09 - 00:53:01:09<br>Harry<br>Coming back LeBron to.  </p>
<p>00:53:01:09 - 00:53:25:21<br>Marty<br>My eyebrows that's true. It's true. Um, one other topic I want to talk about with the emergence of the ETFs, how do you think that affects stocks like MicroStrategy and public mining stocks that have historically been used as a way to get exposure to Bitcoin without direct exposure via public markets?  </p>
<p>00:53:25:24 - 00:53:58:15<br>Harry<br>I mean, look, I think that I think that we saw we have evidence now, right? We saw the ETF come out and we saw a bunch of those stocks, especially MicroStrategy, go down. I think MicroStrategy was viewed basically as a holding company for Bitcoin. Now they deserve some premium because they're able to lever into some bitcoin. You know, I love I forget who did this analysis on on XCOM, but they basically looked at the you know, the SATs per share that you own if you own, you know, stock in MicroStrategy.  </p>
<p>00:53:58:15 - 00:54:22:01<br>Harry<br>And that number actually goes up based on the way that that they've issued new stock and bought Bitcoin with it. So I think there's there's some interesting sort of deeper fundamental analysis that's going to go into the decision to own, you know, a stock like MicroStrategy versus a share of of what we'll talk about the bitwise folks we like that be and we like, you know, the ark folks and have relationships across there.  </p>
<p>00:54:22:01 - 00:54:43:21<br>Harry<br>But I love that they're funding developers out of those management fees. And, you know, I think we've seen you know, we've seen the premium come out of microstrategy's to a large degree and enter, you know, ETF land. I Think the miners are a more interesting case and I just look at them broadly but I think it's an opposite it's an opportunity for differentiation.  </p>
<p>00:54:43:28 - 00:55:03:11<br>Harry<br>Right. You're taking sort of some of the market data into a different vehicle, but maybe that means there's more room for the market alpha for a differentiated operator to, you know, to really show their chops or many of them to show different chops. You know, there's a lot of different kind of operating models across the different pub codes that are out there.  </p>
<p>00:55:03:13 - 00:55:26:23<br>Harry<br>But yeah, I mean, it's it's an opportunity to demonstrate differentiation and, you know, attract people to those names or explain to people why, you know, being able to generate revenue in Bitcoin terms and, and do so on a profitable or highly profitable basis is a compelling equity investment. And so maybe they can get looked at more like companies and less like Bitcoin, you know, holding companies.  </p>
<p>00:55:26:25 - 00:56:04:20<br>Marty<br>Yes, I completely agree. Which is good for the market too. That particularly the differentiation that's going to be necessary to set your self apart in the world of public markets, you under clocking strategies that getting more ingrained with demand response systems, becoming energy providers, maybe getting acquired by an energy provider, becoming part of that stack, people are going to get creative, which should be a forcing function for a more efficient mining industry and a more healthy Bitcoin overall at the end of the day.  </p>
<p>00:56:04:22 - 00:56:28:01<br>Harry<br>And and a more and a more fulfilled investment community. Right. Like, you know, I think there's a lot of sort of well, as the ETF like bad for bitcoin I'm like I don't know I like when people have access to more choices right at the end of the day, like I don't know somebody's personal situation and maybe the ETF is the most, you know, obvious and greatest thing in the world for them.  </p>
<p>00:56:28:04 - 00:56:46:07<br>Harry<br>It's not how I would choose to get exposure to Bitcoin, you know, for me, because I can't, you know, engage in and, you know, the self-sovereign component of it. But, you know, but I'm sure there's lots of people out there who that's a much more constructive product and they want the price exposure to Bitcoin and that's really meaningful for them and that's great.  </p>
<p>00:56:46:09 - 00:57:06:15<br>Harry<br>So I think any time that that, you know, the market's able to make better, more informed and broader choices across, you know, a broader range of vehicles, like I think that's net positive and is in keeping with sort of the the, you know, the libertarian on my shoulder which says that, you know, people deserve more choices and more freedom to choose and that's positive.  </p>
<p>00:57:06:15 - 00:57:28:10<br>Harry<br>And then ultimately the market over time will will, you know, move away from being a voting machine and moving back towards a weighing machine. And and you know that. And that's where sort of the truth gets to be, you know, litigated which is which is in the market for ideas first in the market for, you know, for financial outcomes second.  </p>
<p>00:57:28:13 - 00:57:43:05<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Which is a perfect segue way into how well we can end it on, which is the fact that you joined 1031 as an advisor as well. We've been talking behind the scenes for, gosh feels like years now, but it's official.  </p>
<p>00:57:43:05 - 00:57:46:12<br>Harry<br>It has been years and confirm.  </p>
<p>00:57:46:15 - 00:58:09:23<br>Marty<br>It's official now. And that is our our goal, our aim, our mission is to go out and find the entrepreneurs that are building out the critical Bitcoin infrastructure that will lead us to a Bitcoin standard, make it easier for people to access Bitcoin, to use Bitcoin to leverage Bitcoin to mine Bitcoin, whatever it may be, and to give the market more options.  </p>
<p>00:58:09:23 - 00:58:37:07<br>Marty<br>At the end of the day. And we're extremely excited to officially have you on board. And I think the opportunity that lays before us at 1031 specifically is extremely exciting as well. I said mining is the most exciting industry and I truly believe that. But having the luxury of getting a view into every other sector of the Bitcoin economy is extremely rewarding as well.  </p>
<p>00:58:37:07 - 00:58:41:22<br>Marty<br>And I couldn't be happier to have you on board to advise.  </p>
<p>00:58:41:22 - 00:59:08:17<br>Harry<br>I couldn't be happier. I couldn't be happier. No, I think, you know, any any time you get to work with a market leader, you take it right. You guys have done have done so much hard work, you know, John. Jonathan Grant You know. O'Dell And you obviously as well as as well as all the LP's, you know, have just done a phenomenal job putting together a really thoughtful and mature, you know, investment platform.  </p>
<p>00:59:08:17 - 00:59:34:18<br>Harry<br>Obviously, that's skewed significantly towards venture thus far because I think, you know, Bitcoin is still in in venture land where, you know, the biggest companies are being built are yet to be built. They haven't you know, they haven't reached maturation by any stretch, you know, thrilled to obviously be a portfolio company at GRID. But but for me, like what's most exciting is getting to work with it's used to work with founders, right?  </p>
<p>00:59:34:18 - 01:00:00:19<br>Harry<br>The startup journey is not like any you know, nobody nobody could have told me what it was going to be like on the way in. And we're not done yet by any stretch, obviously. So getting to share, you know, the hard lessons, the good lessons, you know, what did we do right? What did we do wrong from along the way with other founders and being able to kind of take the the you know, the the the long the long, dark night of the soul type of call.  </p>
<p>01:00:00:21 - 01:00:21:03<br>Harry<br>You know, that's what was really exciting to me because it's really hard. And, you know, being a founder or a co-founder of an early stage company can be extremely isolating. And so having some, you know, folks in the been there done that club who can sit alongside you and hold your hand when when you're facing kind of the toughest pieces.  </p>
<p>01:00:21:05 - 01:00:43:28<br>Harry<br>That's so, so exciting to me getting to work with you guys on, you know, on fundraising and on and on allocations like all of that kind of stuff is something that, you know, that I'm tremendously passionate about, along with, you know, working directly with founders. So, you know, couldn't couldn't be happier, couldn't be a more symbiotic relationship between Grid and 1031 and between me and 1031.  </p>
<p>01:00:43:28 - 01:00:46:03<br>Harry<br>So thrilled to be here.  </p>
<p>01:00:46:06 - 01:01:13:20<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I that's another thing that is really unique about the position that we're in. This is Bitcoiners more broadly, but 1031 specifically, yes, we're a venture fund, the portfolio, the portfolio of companies that we've allocated to. But in your incumbent venture space, it's usually spray and pray across many different verticals, many different subsectors of companies doing wildly different things.  </p>
<p>01:01:13:20 - 01:01:52:18<br>Marty<br>But with the focus that we have a 1031 on Bitcoin specifically, it enables us to sort of enable the portfolio companies to help each other out where they can and to give that advice obviously very small industry right now. But you have a very large goal and very similar problems. I mean last year to Bear Claw portfolio retreat, I mean the topic of the year was banking relationships and that's something that Bitcoin companies have been targeted, Whether it's explicit or implicit is for for others to determine.  </p>
<p>01:01:52:18 - 01:02:13:10<br>Marty<br>But wasn't isn't easy. Still, for many companies to get banking or banking relationships in the space and just having a focus and being able to have this cross-pollination of ideas and experiences among portfolio companies is something that I think is unique to what we're doing here.  </p>
<p>01:02:13:13 - 01:02:42:11<br>Harry<br>And this is catchy, but I'll say it anyway, which is like Bitcoin is a social hack where when I meet other Bitcoiners, I'm like 90% of the way towards friends. When I meet other Bitcoin entrepreneurs, I'm like 97% of the way towards friends. So, you know, being, you know, being able to kind of self-select into a group of people who are convicted enough to be, you know, to be bitcoiners in the first place, but then convicted and asked to build companies around Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:02:42:13 - 01:03:00:02<br>Harry<br>It's just rarefied air, whether you're a portfolio company of 1031 or not. I just think, you know, the founders and employees at Bitcoin companies are a pretty special breed and and it's just it's just the most the most gratifying thing to get to be around those kinds of people all the time.  </p>
<p>01:03:00:04 - 01:03:05:11<br>Marty<br>You got to be a little crazy. Just get I like crazy. It's a.  </p>
<p>01:03:05:13 - 01:03:06:28<br>Harry<br>You know. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:03:07:03 - 01:03:12:07<br>Marty<br>Oh yeah, yeah. You can tell that is this was this.  </p>
<p>01:03:12:07 - 01:03:14:16<br>Harry<br>Was a Marty Jones free episode.  </p>
<p>01:03:14:19 - 01:03:16:27<br>Marty<br>I I've got the white collared shirt on.  </p>
<p>01:03:16:28 - 01:03:18:10<br>Harry<br>You got the button down on.  </p>
<p>01:03:18:12 - 01:03:29:15<br>Marty<br>I've got the button down on. I've got two buttons unbuttoned here and a little loose. But that's it. It's Monday morning. It's Monday afternoon now. The morning flew by yesterday.  </p>
<p>01:03:29:15 - 01:03:30:07<br>Harry<br>Ran away.  </p>
<p>01:03:30:10 - 01:03:44:12<br>Marty<br>Keeping Marty Jones in the cage for this one. Uh, what haven't we talked about? That's on top of your mind. I think maybe we should cover it. Doesn't have to be mining related. Could be Bitcoin related.  </p>
<p>01:03:44:14 - 01:04:14:20<br>Harry<br>I mean, I think, you know, I think this is this is a good kind of time to remember that, you know, lower your time preference. Bitcoin comes at you super fast and so cherish these days of like quiet in the markets, you know, you know, it's great to be bouncing between 38 K and 45 K or you know, 42 and 43 like these are these are calm waters that we're in right now and they won't stay calm forever.  </p>
<p>01:04:14:22 - 01:04:26:05<br>Harry<br>So, you know, cherish the cherish the peace of mind that you got, you know, on these kinds of days. And and, you know, remember that Bitcoin is the longest game we've ever gotten to play.  </p>
<p>01:04:26:07 - 01:04:31:00<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it gets crazy when the price starts having.  </p>
<p>01:04:31:02 - 01:04:33:12<br>Harry<br>Focused productivity down, price up.  </p>
<p>01:04:33:14 - 01:05:03:26<br>Marty<br>Well, anybody out there building a company, humbly stacking sets, just prepare for the distractions. Mentally prepare, especially if you're running a company. Let your employees know that your team. Now things are going to get crazy. You're going to get the pull of distraction, pulling you day in and day out. So we're getting large green candles, large red candles up into the right, buckle down and try to focus.  </p>
<p>01:05:03:28 - 01:05:08:15<br>Harry<br>Anticipating exactly when.  </p>
<p>01:05:08:15 - 01:05:11:27<br>Marty<br>It comes, because we got we've got a lot to build.  </p>
<p>01:05:12:00 - 01:05:16:13<br>Harry<br>We've got a lot to build. Harry future on build itself.  </p>
<p>01:05:16:16 - 01:05:19:29<br>Marty<br>It's not takes individuals like you.  </p>
<p>01:05:20:02 - 01:05:20:25<br>Harry<br>And you.  </p>
<p>01:05:20:27 - 01:05:36:08<br>Marty<br>Many other people out there. We're doing it though. We're winning. Yeah. People working out here in the Commons working hard. You're in Nashville. The park is full partner, not there. But I was on a call with somebody earlier at the park and I saw it was full. We're doing it.  </p>
<p>01:05:36:14 - 01:05:54:05<br>Harry<br>I went in there. I went in there. I had I had to do a little bit of stuff last night. I got I got to the park at like 8:00 and there were like six cars there and there were like two conference rooms lit up. People were working. Like the state of our network is strong. This is what winning looks like.  </p>
<p>01:05:54:08 - 01:06:09:05<br>Harry<br>It's Bitcoiners who can't sleep on a Sunday and have to grind on their next, whether it's their next release or their next slide deck prep or whatever. Like they're grinding and our enemies aren't. And so we're going out working.  </p>
<p>01:06:09:08 - 01:06:13:05<br>Marty<br>The momentum is building. It's going to be a good year.  </p>
<p>01:06:13:07 - 01:06:14:17<br>Harry<br>Harry. Good year.  </p>
<p>01:06:14:20 - 01:06:20:23<br>Marty<br>Thank you for joining me. We can't wait two years for the next episode. That is to answer.  </p>
<p>01:06:20:25 - 01:06:24:09<br>Harry<br>Well, we'll put it on the calendar. Less than two years.  </p>
<p>01:06:24:11 - 01:06:28:19<br>Marty<br>Yes, less than two years. You heard it here first. That's all we got today for X peace, love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[Scrib]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/bitcoin-mining-state-of-the-union-harry-sudock/">Read original post</a></p>
<p>In this episode of TFTC Marty was joined by Harry Sudock to discuss a variety of topics around Bitcoin, Bitcoin mining, and the broader energy sector, providing valuable insights into the current state and future of these industries.</p>
<h3><strong>Public Markets and Bitcoin Ideology</strong></h3>
<p>The conversation started with the recent event of Griid (a Bitcoin mining company) going public and how that aligns with Bitcoin's ideology. The public market offers the ability to put shares into many people's hands, which helps decentralize Bitcoin ownership. It also provides access to capital, which is crucial in a capital-intensive business like mining.</p>
<h3><strong>Bitcoin Mining's Maturation</strong></h3>
<p>The mining industry has matured significantly, with home mining and "citadel mining" becoming more prevalent. There's a focus on integrating mining with other use cases like process heat and establishing it as a key player in the energy sector.</p>
<h3><strong>Energy Sector Engagement</strong></h3>
<p>Key figures in the energy sector are actively engaging with Bitcoin mining, recognizing its potential to act as a catalyst for change and maturation of the electric system. The flexibility that Bitcoin mining offers is becoming very clear to energy professionals.</p>
<h3><strong>Hash Rate and Network Security</strong></h3>
<p>Bitcoin's installed hash rate base has reached a level that signifies a strong security model and the increasing utility and value of Bitcoin as a network.</p>
<h3><strong>Mining Industry Trends:</strong></h3>
<p>There's a significant focus on technology that allows mining in harsh environments (like immersion cooling), increasing efficiency, and making more energy sources viable for mining operations.</p>
<h3><strong>ASIC Manufacturers and Competition</strong></h3>
<p>The duopoly of ASIC manufacturers (Bitmain and MicroBT) is strong, but there's room for innovation and new entrants in the market. The conversation touched on the potential for commodification and what that could mean for the industry.</p>
<h3><strong>Bitcoin Halving and Business Preparedness</strong></h3>
<p>As the next Bitcoin halving approaches, miners are focusing on efficiency and cost-consciousness to ensure resilience. The halving is a testament to Bitcoin's predictable monetary policy.</p>
<h3><strong>Impact of Bitcoin ETFs</strong></h3>
<p>The emergence of Bitcoin ETFs has shifted the market dynamics for companies like MicroStrategy and public mining companies, pushing them to differentiate themselves more as businesses rather than just Bitcoin holding entities.</p>
<h3><strong>Geopolitical and Environmental Considerations</strong></h3>
<p>The conversation touched on the geopolitical risks surrounding ASIC manufacturing and the need for energy policies that support stable and sustainable power sources, like nuclear energy.</p>
<h3><strong>The Role of Venture Capital in Bitcoin:</strong></h3>
<p>Marty's and Harry's work at Ten31 focuses on supporting the growth of Bitcoin and its ecosystem by investing in companies that build critical infrastructure and by providing guidance to entrepreneurs in the space.</p>
<h2>Sponsors</h2>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h3>Best Quotes</h3>
<p>"Bitcoin demonetizes the political class and remonetizes the productive class." - Harry</p>
<ul>
<li>This quote highlights the underlying ethos of Bitcoin as an empowering tool for the productive members of society and its potential impact on traditional power structures.</li>
</ul>
<p>"You can't virtue signal your way out of physics." - Harry</p>
<ul>
<li>Harry used this quote to emphasize the practical limitations of transitioning to renewable energy sources without considering the actual energy needs and the role that stable sources like nuclear energy play.</li>
</ul>
<p>"Bitcoin is the longest game we've ever gotten to play." - Harry</p>
<ul>
<li>This quote reflects the long-term vision and commitment required to be part of the Bitcoin ecosystem, acknowledging the ongoing journey toward broader adoption and integration into the financial system.</li>
</ul>
<p>"The future won't build itself." - Harry</p>
<ul>
<li>Harry emphasized the proactive effort required from the Bitcoin community to continue building and innovating within the space, ensuring the network's growth and resilience.</li>
</ul>
<p>"Being a founder or co-founder of an early-stage company can be extremely isolating. And so having some folks in the 'been there, done that' club who can sit alongside you and hold your hand when you're facing the toughest pieces, that's so exciting to me." - Harry</p>
<ul>
<li>Harry discusses the value of mentorship and support within the startup community, particularly in the challenging and fast-paced Bitcoin industry.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>This podcast episode provided a deep dive into the world of Bitcoin mining and its interaction with the energy sector, as well as the role of venture capital in supporting the growth of the Bitcoin ecosystem. The discussion covered a wide range of topics, from the specifics of mining technology to the broader implications of Bitcoin's monetary policy and the market dynamics influenced by new financial products like ETFs.</p>
<p>The overarching message was clear: the Bitcoin mining industry is at a pivotal stage of growth and professionalization, with a strong focus on energy efficiency, technological innovation, and integration with the energy sector. This growth comes with challenges, including regulatory and geopolitical concerns, but also presents tremendous opportunities for those willing to engage with the complexities of this nascent industry.</p>
<p>As we look to the future, the insights and reflections from this episode offer a roadmap for entrepreneurs, investors, and enthusiasts who are part of the Bitcoin journey. The potential for Bitcoin to reshape our understanding of money and energy is immense, and the continued dedication and innovation from the community will be critical in realizing this vision.</p>
<h3>Timestamps</h3>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>7:26 - Big week for Griid<br>11:21 - State of the mining industry<br>15:46 - Industrial adoption<br>19:43 - Demand response<br>23:46 - Energy FUD from the parasitic class<br>31:44 - Future of mining<br>36:06 - Technical innovation<br>37:27 - ASIC manufacturers<br>45:02 - Halvening<br>51:59 - Political influence and pencil making<br>58:27 - ETF and stocks<br>1:02:54 - Ten31 advisor<br>1:08:56 - Wrapping up</p>
<h3>Transcript</h3>
<p>00:00:01:26 - 00:00:03:14<br>Harry<br>I'm good for, like, 90.  </p>
<p>00:00:03:17 - 00:00:26:00<br>Marty<br>All right. You going for 90? Now, the freaks know that we have 90 minutes. We're recording. Harry. We were just trying to determine how long it's been since we last sat down here on TFT to have a discussion for for this audience. Obviously, we've had many conversations outside of TFT between now and the last number recorded here.  </p>
<p>00:00:26:00 - 00:00:30:05<br>Harry<br>But but until it really happen, if the freaks can't hear it.  </p>
<p>00:00:30:08 - 00:00:35:06<br>Marty<br>I don't know. I don't know. Well, luckily.  </p>
<p>00:00:35:09 - 00:00:41:20<br>Harry<br>I have a puppy. There's pepper. Pepper here. We can get a little. Oh.  </p>
<p>00:00:41:22 - 00:00:44:00<br>Marty<br>It's a pepper. You look warm.  </p>
<p>00:00:44:03 - 00:00:49:13<br>Harry<br>Yeah. Not a winter dog needs a winter outfit. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:00:49:15 - 00:01:11:07<br>Marty<br>So a lot has happened. Big week. I mean, maybe we should start there. It's been a big week. Big seven day week, Big, powerful, big last couple of months. Grid getting through the SPAC process. Finally, life in the public markets. We announced last week that you joined 1031 as an advisor and again, a lot has happened since last time we reported.  </p>
<p>00:01:11:07 - 00:01:19:01<br>Marty<br>And today I guess let's start there. What is the week been like and what was the the build up.  </p>
<p>00:01:19:04 - 00:01:58:05<br>Harry<br>To the last. Yeah, I mean the, the, you know, it's the, it's the old saying like, you know, there are weeks when a decade happens and decades when when a week happens and you know for us you know, we didn't we didn't start the business expecting to be a public company in 2018. But that's kind of the road that we ended up on for a lot of reasons and, you know, the reasons why we felt that the public market was the right place for us was was really just, you know, around sort of our Bitcoin ideology and goals, which is that being able to put shares into lots of people's hands and make them available  </p>
<p>00:01:58:07 - 00:02:22:15<br>Harry<br>serves as another vector around getting you know, Bitcoin and hashrate decentralized on an ownership basis. And also it's obviously a high capital intensive business and and where better to do that than in the American public markets? So we're thrilled to be on the other side of the deal. We're thrilled to be Nasdaq listed. And, you know, more than anything on my mind is let's get back to work.  </p>
<p>00:02:22:17 - 00:02:24:22<br>Harry<br>We've got a business to grow.  </p>
<p>00:02:24:25 - 00:02:39:20<br>Marty<br>Yeah, yeah, we all do. It's in the it feels like the timing's perfect a few months before that thing to the winds of a potential bull market seem to be blowing in the distance. Getting closer.  </p>
<p>00:02:39:22 - 00:02:59:06<br>Harry<br>I wake up every day and Bitcoin is more useful than it was the day before. You know, other people are catching on. You know, Pete McCormick and I talked about this a bunch, but like, we're sort of at the you know, the end of the beginning feels like ETF land took us to the end of the beginning or maybe the beginning of the middle.  </p>
<p>00:02:59:08 - 00:03:20:18<br>Harry<br>And that kind of makes sense, right? Like the Internet 15 years end was at the end of the beginning. The big killer apps hadn't sort of emerged. You know, we weren't on 3 billion smartphones yet, but you know, but all of that was sort of yet to come. And I think, you know, in our Bitcoin journey, we're at a similar point where, you know, it's not niche and early anymore.  </p>
<p>00:03:20:21 - 00:03:43:10<br>Harry<br>It might be early in terms of price, but it's not early in terms of of mindshare. You know, Bitcoin is a household name and it's a word that everybody recognizes at this point, you know, for good or for bad, they might have their own, you know, positive or negative association with it. But, you know, but we're not a shadowy corner of the Internet anymore, and that's exciting.  </p>
<p>00:03:43:13 - 00:04:10:06<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it really is. And we just had the Energy and Mining Summit in Nashville and which was hyperfocus on the mining industry, where it is in its maturation phase and where it may be going in the future. And since we have you on in your deep knowledge of the mining sector, particularly here in the United States, I think maybe not to talk about Bitcoin too broadly this, but hone in on Bitcoin mining as an industry.  </p>
<p>00:04:10:12 - 00:04:21:00<br>Marty<br>What has happened over the last two years since we last spoke, where are we now? Where may, may we be going in the next 2 to 3 years?  </p>
<p>00:04:21:02 - 00:04:42:01<br>Harry<br>Yeah, I mean the the, the really great part about what's happened in Bitcoin mining is that the business model, the size and the scale, all of those types of dynamics have gone through maybe an even more aggressive maturation process than Bitcoin has. You know, we're seeing, you know, home miners are doing all sorts of new kinds of things.  </p>
<p>00:04:42:01 - 00:05:05:03<br>Harry<br>We had a panel about, you know, what we call Citadel Mining, which is, you know, everything from one miner in the garage to, you know, one to Steve Barber's hash huts on your property. You know, anything anything that is sort of a homesteading version of mining. And that panel was was fascinating. A ton of discussion around process heat and other sort of integrated use cases.  </p>
<p>00:05:05:05 - 00:05:37:04<br>Harry<br>You know, we've seen, you know, the senator from Tennessee, both senator from Tennessee, actually have engaged really aggressively on Bitcoin and Bitcoin mining. We had the CEO of TVA at the event giving what I found to be, you know, truly a profound discussion of where he thinks energy is going and immediately understood that the role of a flexible consumer and the role of the miner is really a catalyst for change and towards the maturation of our electric system.  </p>
<p>00:05:37:06 - 00:06:01:21<br>Harry<br>You know, that's not a static thing, right? We didn't we didn't wake up with the grid that we had 90 years ago. We've been iterating and improving components of that system all along the way. And so seeing the translation layer between some of them, you know, most senior business experts on the energy side rocking Bitcoin, you know, basically at face value now getting him in a room with miners.  </p>
<p>00:06:01:21 - 00:06:34:01<br>Harry<br>There's a ton of his customers in that room. You know, Grid is one of them, but there are many others. And seeing the clarity that incredible energy professionals are viewing the mining sector with was hugely refreshing. So, you know, all of that is is super, super encouraging. You know, I think the the other macro topic that needs acknowledgment is just that, you know, bitcoin's, you know, installed hash rate base has gotten escape velocity, right?  </p>
<p>00:06:34:01 - 00:07:06:02<br>Harry<br>The whole Bitcoin network is running, you know, somewhere between 15 and 20 gigawatts. It's running 0 to 500 index a hash. You know, we're probably sniffing 600 at this point. The ability for the network to go up, you know, 10% on a difficulty or a hash rate basis from here. You know the the base that we're building off of is now so large that each of these incremental components of growth, you know, we're just talking really big numbers and that's exciting.  </p>
<p>00:07:06:02 - 00:07:32:10<br>Harry<br>It means that the security model for Bitcoin is incredibly strong. It means that the value proposition for sound money that can be transacted on a permissionless and censorship resistant basis is stronger than ever. And the level of professionalism that I get to see you know, both within our company but also across our peers is just really high. I'm really I'm really proud to call them, you know, members of the same you know, the same business community.  </p>
<p>00:07:32:10 - 00:07:40:05<br>Harry<br>So I think all of those things are significantly more mature than they were even the last time we had a conversation on the show.  </p>
<p>00:07:40:07 - 00:08:11:03<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And it was extremely refreshing. The Energy and Mining Summit, the president, CEO of the TVA coming really I was extremely impressed by him. Kids about specifics of what was said. But I will say that his presentation and his earnest curiosity was refreshing from somebody in a position of that type of power where you'd expect them just to be a politician like figurehead of his business and just read the script.  </p>
<p>00:08:11:05 - 00:08:32:28<br>Marty<br>Essentially. He was very engaging and again, genuinely curious, which I was extremely encouraged to find. And then another thing, this whole theme that we're talking about here, it's like one of the questions we get at 1031 quite a bit from prospective investors is we're like, Nobody's adopting Bitcoin. Like, when are people going to start spending it at the store?  </p>
<p>00:08:32:28 - 00:08:58:02<br>Marty<br>When What am I going to be able to go and buy groceries with Bitcoin? And you have to answer that. Yeah. Obviously it's not there that everybody has bitcoin, but I think it's important to realize different types of adoption and the order of operation through which we'll get to bitcoins and state of full success, which is yes, not everybody is able to spend and receive Bitcoin at the grocery store.  </p>
<p>00:08:58:02 - 00:09:23:01<br>Marty<br>However, on the earlier side of the order of operations is this this mining, the distribution of hash rate, this growth of hash rate and integration with the energy sector and the energy sector, I believe has reached a critical tipping point of adoption that is not recognized by the people who just view Bitcoin adoption as where can I spend it, who's accepting it?  </p>
<p>00:09:23:03 - 00:09:45:19<br>Harry<br>Yeah, I think, you know, Bitcoin the currency is it's like saying, where can I spend a barrel of oil or where can I spend a T-bill? Right. Like, that's not the metric that I think is meaningful today. I think all of those, you know, transaction based numbers, you know, numbers and graphs like all of that matters over a longer time scale for sure.  </p>
<p>00:09:45:21 - 00:10:14:15<br>Harry<br>But at the point where we are today, you know, it's about getting Bitcoin onto balance sheets, whether that's household balance sheets or corporate balance sheets or state and government balance sheets. You know, that's the first beachhead that Bitcoin really is is crossing. And I think, you know, we we we got a little bit sort of twisted up in the weeds of it all, you know, earlier on in, you know, in this great shared history of ours.  </p>
<p>00:10:14:15 - 00:10:54:27<br>Harry<br>But, you know, the ability to spend Bitcoin is not the same as the ability to send Bitcoin. And those are different ideas. And so I think we're climbing the store of value adoption curve incredibly constructively. And so it's it's great for us to be able to see that. And I think you're exactly right. The market penetration that Bitcoin mining, you know, is accomplishing today, you know along the lowest sort of strata of energy cost sources, you know, whether that's here in the U.S. or it's abroad, you know, the penetration at those low cost, high opportunity points is enormous.  </p>
<p>00:10:54:29 - 00:11:17:13<br>Harry<br>You know, if you're if you're not thinking about where does Bitcoin mining represent value accrual, if you're, you know, an intermittent generator or if you're a steady baseload generator that needs to manage uptime, anybody who cares about power and uptime should be having a conversation with a Bitcoin miner or be thinking about how do I design a rate class that gets Bitcoin miners?  </p>
<p>00:11:17:13 - 00:11:45:13<br>Harry<br>The prices that they need which are, you know, transparently the bottom of the barrel. But the tradeoff there is that, you know, my father, a lifelong CFO, would always tell me that in any any negotiation you have to pick between price and terms. And I can tell you that on the mining side, we're very firmly in the camp of picking price and taking terms, and that's reared its head in in the demand response adoption that we've represented already.  </p>
<p>00:11:45:13 - 00:12:18:10<br>Harry<br>You know, we do it in the TVA version of that reality. The folks in ERCOT are doing that, and the folks in every power market in the U.S. that has programs that offer, you know, a demand response, compensation kind of rate, class or tariff, you know, everybody wants that. So, you know, the the really interesting thing is to see the ability to deliver on the technical requirements of an actual demand response program and then the desire to expand those programs to increase reliability and lower costs for the average user.  </p>
<p>00:12:18:12 - 00:12:51:02<br>Marty<br>Yeah, just digging into this demand response use case in and of itself, you can already see Bitcoin miners beginning to effect change across different sort of power providers across the country. ERCOT obviously here in Texas, very advanced from the pricing signal perspective, there's API's that are connecting to mining firmware, that mining firmware is reading the pricing signals and adjusting hash rate with those pricing signals almost immediately.  </p>
<p>00:12:51:02 - 00:13:15:04<br>Marty<br>Whereas if you zoom up to the Tier two VA, it's a bit more manual. You get a call from the TVA a day or two before they expect you to turn down during peaks or peaks of demand where they need electricity sent back to the grid and you have somebody go and turn down the operation or do that from a back end software solution.  </p>
<p>00:13:15:07 - 00:13:30:16<br>Marty<br>You could see they're like, you imagine the TVA's looking at ERCOT. You're like, Oh man, look at all that's this demand response system is with all these pricing signals. Maybe if we could build an API pricing service like that for the miners up here, we could be much more efficient.  </p>
<p>00:13:30:18 - 00:13:52:18<br>Harry<br>Yeah, efficiency is the name of the game, right? Like these are these are assets that are already bought and paid for. All the transmission lines are bought and paid for, all the substations are bought and paid for. And so now that the CapEx is out the door for all of these electric systems, how do we get to a place where utilization is able to climb even just a few percentage points?  </p>
<p>00:13:52:21 - 00:14:15:00<br>Harry<br>You know, because at the end of the day, if you think about the you know, I think of sort of the world in terms of a nexus of contracts, there is a contract that your power provider signs with you. The rate payer. I'm sitting in my house like I use Nashville Electric. And, you know, their commitment to me is really around power availability.  </p>
<p>00:14:15:00 - 00:14:51:20<br>Harry<br>So let's say the system gets super stressed and they've got to import power from meso those megawatt hours are incredibly, incredibly expensive and the price of those megawatt hours would be better, you know, as a as a rebate to their flexible load customers rather than a forced import during the time when things are tightest. And so there's a really compelling economic case around why demand response is accretive, you know, both to the power provider as well as to the individual ratepayers at the household level, as well as to the demand response program participants at the industrial scale level.  </p>
<p>00:14:51:20 - 00:15:26:28<br>Harry<br>That's a that's found money for everybody involved, right? The power providers lowering their cost. The ratepayer at the household level is raising their uptime and potentially lowering their cost. And the flexible customer is able to lower their costs as well. So it's this incredible, you know, three party positive sum equation that the power providers are able to offer once they've had the introduction of a truly innovative business model, which all the the mining community believes and rightly so, that they represent with this flexible load type of profile.  </p>
<p>00:15:27:00 - 00:15:51:20<br>Harry<br>And in addition to that, it's better for the generating assets. You don't want to turn those things up and down. You know, as much as you might have to. And so, you know, there's there's this other net benefit over the longer term as you continue into the useful life for some of these plants, which is that operating in an environment with a flexible customer is actually better for all of the hard assets that are being used to generate the electricity in the first place.  </p>
<p>00:15:51:20 - 00:16:20:15<br>Harry<br>So we're in this in incredible virtuous cycle as as symbiotic partners being the power provider, the bitcoin miner, and then the households and businesses that that power provider serves outside of the flexible customer. So I'm incredibly motivated to keep working on what it means to reinvigorate some of these electric systems in a way that that really benefits the entire kind of, you know, nexus of parties.  </p>
<p>00:16:20:17 - 00:16:29:17<br>Marty<br>Harry Versus systemic risk to the system. Did you're not here what the Department of Energy in the EIA I have to say last week.  </p>
<p>00:16:29:20 - 00:16:56:12<br>Harry<br>I understand that that was an interpretation that was floated to the community. I happen to strongly disagree with that interpretation. You know, I think I think that, you know, there's there's sort of a I said this many years ago, but, you know, Bitcoin, you know, demonetized the political class and intact, as is the productive class. And you know, in in keeping with that theme, you know, the the engineers will inherit the earth.  </p>
<p>00:16:56:14 - 00:17:15:23<br>Harry<br>And so that means the power engineers that work on these systems, the people with their boots on the ground. You know, there's I just found this out. I looked at like, what are some of the highest compensated roles that you could have in America? Because I was just I was just curious. One of the weird ones I don't know about that, that maybe I should have kind of to school for.  </p>
<p>00:17:15:26 - 00:17:39:02<br>Harry<br>One of them is there's a guy whose job it is or woman whose job is to hang out of a helicopter on, you know, basically a tether with a chainsaw to manage trees on the high voltage lines, super high up in the air. They make like 400 grand a year. And so those are the people who I think we're building, you know, Bitcoin mining for because we make all of those roles easier.  </p>
<p>00:17:39:04 - 00:18:06:22<br>Harry<br>You know, if that takes an education process in Washington in order to make that value proposition clear, you know, so be it. But I think that, you know, once you once you put the hard data, you know, to these folks, I think the case for Bitcoin is really quite an obvious one. You know, the ideological challenge that we might face is the the sort of baseline assumption, which is that, you know, nobody likes our pet rock.  </p>
<p>00:18:06:25 - 00:18:13:16<br>Harry<br>And I think we're really facing more of that perspective than any sort of legitimate concern around electric reliability.  </p>
<p>00:18:13:18 - 00:18:19:27<br>Marty<br>Yeah, Bitcoin has no no value. It's just a Ponzi scheme, a pet rock. If you will. I don't know. Not helping.  </p>
<p>00:18:19:29 - 00:18:24:21<br>Harry<br>Seems like a lot of market participants who are willing to pay $43,000 a coin right now.  </p>
<p>00:18:24:23 - 00:18:49:17<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it think they think it's valuable. Their parting dollars to get parting with dollars to get bitcoin. But it is like a we discussed this too on our panel the first day of the summit. But it is like you said, we have this sort of pull between the productive class and the unproductive class. The parasitic class probably more descriptive what they actually are right now.  </p>
<p>00:18:49:17 - 00:19:21:12<br>Marty<br>And it's not just specific to Bitcoin. I mean, we zoom out and focus on energy more broadly. Like we talked about the example of this wasn't on our panels, the what Bitcoin Did episode, the live episode on day one in Germany, it's like over 20 years they decommissioned, I think 20 gigawatts worth of nuclear power generation more than doubled their overall capacity generation capacity over the first 20 years of the century, but they doubled their capacity with wind and solar predominantly.  </p>
<p>00:19:21:19 - 00:19:57:13<br>Marty<br>Turns out the sun doesn't shine that much in Germany and the wind doesn't blow as much as they like it to. And so you had a situation in 2002 where nuclear, coal, natural gas were a 86% of the overall generation capacity. Today it's something like 34%. And Germany's got a systemic energy crisis because they don't have reliable power, because they refuse to, for some reason or another, lean into reliable energy sources and say what you will about coal and natural gas and whether or not you think hydrocarbons are here to stay or on the way out.  </p>
<p>00:19:57:13 - 00:20:08:14<br>Marty<br>I mean, nuclear is a very obvious answer to a lot of these energy stability problems that the governments of the world seem to be neglecting for some reason or another.  </p>
<p>00:20:08:15 - 00:20:30:08<br>Harry<br>You can't you can't virtue signal your way out of physics, Right? It just you can't. And and, you know, that's that's just you know, for the climate folks out there, like that's the that's the bitter pill. Right. You're not going to you're not going to build enough wind and solar to solve this in any kind of meaningful way.  </p>
<p>00:20:30:14 - 00:20:53:20<br>Harry<br>And and, you know, the the cohort that drives me kind of the craziest are the ones who are who are staunch climate supporters who believe in the decommissioning of nuclear plants. Right. The these are assets that are fully bought and paid for. They're operating really, really well. They have an incredible safety track record. It's an American technology, nonetheless, that that we were able to innovate on.  </p>
<p>00:20:53:22 - 00:21:20:09<br>Harry<br>And and, you know, the willing the willing sort of voluntary shut off of of these plants, it's just it's despicable. You know, there's there's really there's really no argument for it. So, you know, the playbook that we expect to see and I'm thrilled to say that the Canadian the Canadian folks have are committing to extending useful life at some of their plants.  </p>
<p>00:21:20:12 - 00:21:40:10<br>Harry<br>There's folks at OPG who are committed to building a similar ours, and they're going to do that in TVA. That's public knowledge. So, you know, we are seeing, you know, in California, we were able to avoid, you know, the shutdown of their nuke that's in the in the Los Angeles area. You know, so we're we're starting to turn this tide a little bit.  </p>
<p>00:21:40:10 - 00:22:02:27<br>Harry<br>But, you know, any time you got to turn an aircraft carrier, which is, you know, really the nuclear Regulatory Commission, you know, it's it's a it's a challenge. But but, you know, by gosh, we're going to do it. So I think there is some daylight and some hope on this. But, you know, the the argument that we should shutter nuclear plants is like the single most asinine policy perspective I can think of.  </p>
<p>00:22:03:00 - 00:22:14:01<br>Marty<br>That's literally suicidal, especially if you're going to virtue signal about transitioning away from hydrocarbons and at the same time decommissioning.  </p>
<p>00:22:14:01 - 00:22:39:02<br>Harry<br>Which too, to be fair, like we're we're in favor of building a positive sun electric system. For us, that's meant a huge allocation to hydroelectric assets and raising the revenue profile that they're able to offer. It's it's a huge focus on nuclear, which we love. And and, you know, and there's there's really a you can do well and do good at the same time.  </p>
<p>00:22:39:09 - 00:22:56:28<br>Harry<br>You don't have to you don't have to not have it both ways. But unless you're invest ing in the baseload profile of the electric system, you know you're going to create instability and tail risk that that really will that really will be, you know, significantly detrimental at some point down the road.  </p>
<p>00:22:57:00 - 00:23:10:27<br>Marty<br>Yes. Oh, God, I'm getting triggered. Just thinking of the the LNG export ban or new contract construction of a new LNG export facility ban that came out a couple of weeks ago.  </p>
<p>00:23:10:28 - 00:23:34:11<br>Harry<br>It's well and and you know, and let's let's put our let's put our carbon accounting hats on. Right. If you're if you're replacing a coal asset with a natural gas asset, your carbon intensity of that transition and is incredibly positive, it just happens to run on another hydrocarbon, but a much better one from the carbon accounting perspective. So I think, you know, we we need to be very, very realistic about the physics.  </p>
<p>00:23:34:16 - 00:23:56:22<br>Harry<br>We need to create the demand for these types of flexible load consumers, which means innovating on the contract structure in many of the jurisdictions that are, you know, that are currently not set up to compensate flexible loads as fully as maybe they should be, you know, but these are these are the tough the tough questions and the hard steps that have to be taken.  </p>
<p>00:23:56:24 - 00:24:15:00<br>Harry<br>And, you know, environmental stewardship and strong business performance are not at odds with each other. We just need, you know, sane, cool engineering heads to come together and design solutions that are that are as future proof as possible and shuttering nuclear reactors is the lowest thing you could possibly do on that list. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:24:15:02 - 00:24:49:10<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Very Malthusian when you think about it. But on this trip, I mean, we had this discussion and it was really interesting to see people from different parts of the world come to Nashville to talk about the future of mining and where it may proliferate moving forward. What are your views like? Obviously, the United States, Texas, Tennessee, TVA in Kentucky, other parts, Georgia have really benefited from the Chinese mining exodus that happened a few years ago, two and a half years ago.  </p>
<p>00:24:49:10 - 00:25:14:19<br>Marty<br>Now, at this point, Rackspace is tight. It seems that Bitcoin in the minds of institutions is now go. You got the black rocks of the world saying it's a good thing. And what I've been able to glean is that there are people in other parts of the world that are looking at Bitcoin mining specifically and saying, All right, it's time for us to develop a strategy, deploy some capital and get some hashrate spending up within our borders.  </p>
<p>00:25:14:19 - 00:25:22:17<br>Marty<br>How do you see this international competition for hashrate playing out moving forward?  </p>
<p>00:25:22:19 - 00:25:42:12<br>Harry<br>Yeah, I think, you know, to to win in the mining business, you need to have a structural defensible advantage and that that can come in many forms. I think in America we've got two great structural advantages, one of which are our capital markets, which are the best in the world. The other is that our energy assets are also world class.  </p>
<p>00:25:42:15 - 00:26:02:04<br>Harry<br>And so what are the two key ingredients to a great mining business as well? Capitalized access to energy and so I think the U.S. has has taken a leadership role on the heels of the China the China ban, you know, several years ago. I don't expect us to slow down, you know, maybe on a percentage share basis we're going to lose ground.  </p>
<p>00:26:02:04 - 00:26:23:27<br>Harry<br>But I don't think we're going to you know, I don't think we're going to slow whatsoever. You know, I'm very curious to see what's going to happen in some of these, you know, really sort of oil state wealth environments where there's obviously huge amount of capital available to them because they they've made so much money over the past years and they're starting to look down this diversity path for their portfolios.  </p>
<p>00:26:24:00 - 00:26:51:07<br>Harry<br>And, you know, additionally, they've got access to a huge amount of of incredibly cost effective generation. You know, the US is turning on nuclear reactors and a multi gigawatt solar plant co-located with them. So that's a huge you know, that's a huge opportunity to monetize via the deployment of hashrate. We've seen what Marathon's doing over there. Obviously we've heard the news out of Oman, we've heard the news, you know, in, you know, Dubai and elsewhere.  </p>
<p>00:26:51:09 - 00:27:13:27<br>Harry<br>So, you know, I think then none of that's to say anything about South America which has been involved in this, both, you know, above board and below board. There's sort of a gray market environment. You know, historically in Venezuela, we're seeing large scaled operators operating out of Paraguay. Now we're seeing the Africa trend that grid loss is really spearheading take root.  </p>
<p>00:27:13:27 - 00:27:40:22<br>Harry<br>So I think, you know, the exciting part is that the decentralization of mining, you know, that narrative is very strong because there are structural opportunities to monetize energy in each of these regions. There's an opportunity to, you know, to deploy capital in each of these regions. And there's going to be companies and individuals with a very broad range of risk appetite and operating model appetite to deploy across all of this.  </p>
<p>00:27:40:22 - 00:27:46:09<br>Harry<br>And so, you know, all of it all of it means that, you know, we're probably going to see hash rate go up over time.  </p>
<p>00:27:46:11 - 00:28:11:14<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Then you combine this with the fact that you have hydro boxes and liquid cooling immersion systems becoming more advanced and you have the ability for the first time at scale to deploy hashrate in areas of the world like the Middle East where it was simply impossible due to the physical environment, the heat, specifically even down here in Texas to some extent, like obviously we have a.  </p>
<p>00:28:11:16 - 00:28:12:02<br>Harry<br>Does a.  </p>
<p>00:28:12:02 - 00:28:34:00<br>Marty<br>Lot of hash rate here and a lot of salt, a lot of dust. But the the industry, the picks and shovels, part of the industry building these facilities that allow you to mine in harsh environments has reached a point of maturation as well, where it's really going to open up markets that were previously inaccessible, inaccessible.  </p>
<p>00:28:34:02 - 00:28:49:01<br>Harry<br>Totally. Yeah. There's there's a technology trend that sits underneath all of this. And, you know, on the one hand, it's the efficiency  </p>
<p>00:30:30:28 - 00:30:53:00<br>Marty<br>So little audio troubles. They're back at it. What were we're talking about?  </p>
<p>00:30:53:00 - 00:31:16:08<br>Harry<br>Yes, there's. There's two layers of technical innovation that are happening that I think are going to facilitate broader availability of deployment environments. One of them is that the chips are getting more efficient. And so that just means the units of energy per unit of of hash rate produced over time, you're able to produce, produce more hashes per unit of energy.  </p>
<p>00:31:16:10 - 00:31:43:21<br>Harry<br>The second is all of the technology that's wrapped around that, which includes things like immersion and things like hydro and, and you know, filtration and all the different tools that are available to a mining operator in order to deploy in a harsher environment makes, you know, more sources of generation and more environments available. It means that there's more, you know, economic viability of places that weren't from an operational perspective, but maybe were from a power cost perspective.  </p>
<p>00:31:43:21 - 00:32:03:15<br>Harry<br>Historically. So all of this kind of rolls into the idea that I think is is the tailwind that we're all riding, you know, across Bitcoin, which is more decentralization is likely because, you know, more remote operations are viable. But then secondarily, just the gross hash rate securing the network is going to go up as well.  </p>
<p>00:32:03:18 - 00:32:37:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah, let's let's lean into the ac-dc manufacturers. What are your thoughts on the duopoly, the dominated duopoly by Bitmain? Obviously they've got the S21 series coming to market. They're pricing out of the gate with those machines was very aggressive, many so-called as an attempt to leverage their economies of scale to box potential competitors out of the market. Micro T is it just obviously the second largest player in the market and they have a lot of happy customers.  </p>
<p>00:32:37:16 - 00:32:57:04<br>Marty<br>How do you see this playing out moving into the future? Is Bitmain just using their economies of scale to box people out as micro bitty, beginning to make inroads with larger customers to be seen? Intel come back to the market. Avalon Do any of these companies have a chance of competing?  </p>
<p>00:32:57:07 - 00:33:16:26<br>Harry<br>Look, I think I think that we're still early days. I think that, you know, the manufacturing landscape could change dramatically over time. You know, I think right now Bitmain is sort of winning the day, as they have been for the last couple of years. I think MakerBot is doing a great job. The micro units, you know, are awesome.  </p>
<p>00:33:16:28 - 00:33:41:16<br>Harry<br>They continue to double down on reliability and performance at the cost of some nominal efficiency, which I think has been, you know, a great strategy from them. You know, you've obviously seen riot roll into market with a huge amount of future order. And so I think that, you know, my committee is certainly earning their scale volumes as well.  </p>
<p>00:33:41:19 - 00:34:03:16<br>Harry<br>You know, do I think the duopoly is going to break in the next year? Not particularly. Do I hope that more competitive players enter the market always right. I always want a more competitive market to be able to look at when I think about, you know, capital allocation and hash allocation. But I think that, you know, right now things are, you know, reasonably healthy and competitive.  </p>
<p>00:34:03:18 - 00:34:24:28<br>Harry<br>You know, what we're not seeing this cycle is kind of the price blowout that we saw in 2021 with units trading, you know, significantly ahead of kind of, you know, the future revenue profile. So I think, you know, we're certainly healthier than we were a few years ago, but I'd always love to see additional players enter. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:34:25:00 - 00:34:54:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I would agree there. Yeah, it is crazy how efficient these machines are getting talent and think through my mind like the whole concept of a commodification. Like is that simply a natural catalyst for more competition? When you get to a level where you can make an investment, a capital outlay in building an asset because you're confident that it's not going to make a step function efficiency improvement like the A6 have in the past?  </p>
<p>00:34:54:29 - 00:35:01:29<br>Marty<br>Or does that simply allow the incumbents to just really dominate the market? Um, yet to be seen.  </p>
<p>00:35:01:29 - 00:35:28:14<br>Harry<br>But yeah, yeah, I think, you know, the good news is they don't let me program any of the chips but at least at least not yet. And if they do we have real problems. So you know I think I think there's I think there's sort of the mad scientist and deep technical experts that are working on it. You know, I got to spend some time with Scott from from oh, good Lord, I've lost the name of his project.  </p>
<p>00:35:28:16 - 00:35:33:14<br>Harry<br>But he's doing the open source basic project now.  </p>
<p>00:35:33:14 - 00:35:37:06<br>Marty<br>Future but future. Not that they're not open source.  </p>
<p>00:35:37:08 - 00:36:01:23<br>Harry<br>Hold on. I can find this. He Yeah. So he's working on some open source pieces. You know, I don't think transparently that it's that it is any bit ax I apologize. Scott You know, it's just cool to see people working on stuff and tinkering and innovating along this. You know, we aren't at the mature phase for this industry.  </p>
<p>00:36:01:23 - 00:36:23:15<br>Harry<br>You know, we don't have the you know, we don't have the the, you know, the intel chip or that or the HP. You know, you know, Chip is an intel chip that's in all of those units. But we haven't reached the full commodification layer. We might be at what I view as a long local maximum, which is really sort of the duopoly continuing to innovate.  </p>
<p>00:36:23:17 - 00:36:44:27<br>Harry<br>But we may see, you know, another really interesting breakthrough from a market dynamics perspective that attracts additional folks who want to build down this development path. You know, but unlike software, you don't get to put a software release out every two weeks. You know, it's really, you know, six, 12, 18 month type of time scale to be able to innovate on hardware.  </p>
<p>00:36:45:00 - 00:36:51:16<br>Harry<br>And so, you know, I'm very curious to see what emerges, you know, really over the coming decade, if I'm being honest about timeline.  </p>
<p>00:36:51:18 - 00:36:55:07<br>Marty<br>Yeah, the hash wars are upon us. Who knows?  </p>
<p>00:36:55:09 - 00:36:57:14<br>Harry<br>This could be always has been.  </p>
<p>00:36:57:17 - 00:37:26:01<br>Marty<br>They have been since January 3rd, 2009. Then you have just external factors, geopolitical risk. Who knows what happens in Taiwan with TSMC? Can they spin up foundry here in the United States fast enough to deter any systemic political risks that would come if China were to do something there? Then even then, many people are like TSMC is one of the greatest revenue drivers within Taiwan's.  </p>
<p>00:37:26:01 - 00:37:50:22<br>Marty<br>So to think that China would just come or prevent that company from accruing tax revenues by selling their goods to market is a bit crazy as well. But these are unknowns that that can affect the market. It's crazy to think the range of effects. While we were in Nashville, the weather was affecting Bitcoin rate. Yeah, weather down south produced a -4%.  </p>
<p>00:37:50:22 - 00:38:14:24<br>Marty<br>Difficulty adjustment 3.9% due to everybody engaging demand response. And that's why I mean, I'm sure I know that you feel this way too. It's just I don't think there's a more exciting industry to be in than Bitcoin mining right now because of all these different variables you have to think about. It's certainly very masochistic as well, but it's never boring.  </p>
<p>00:38:14:26 - 00:38:38:17<br>Harry<br>And it's honest, right? Like what I love most about mining is that, you know, I can't make my terror hash our, you know, you know, I'm not going to do I'm not going to outsell my, you know, competitor for the next software sales deal and, you know, sell $9 a seat for, you know, you know, for 12 months, you know, because I've got a better, you know, CRM product in market, right?  </p>
<p>00:38:38:17 - 00:39:05:03<br>Harry<br>Like, no, it's a it's a pure, honest capitalist endeavor to be able to generate hashes more efficiently than the next person. And that's that's a really refreshing environment to build a company into because you can see on a daily basis, if you're doing it the right way, you get a report card, you know, on a very, very frequent basis, which is fun and is very, very motivating.  </p>
<p>00:39:05:05 - 00:39:22:05<br>Harry<br>So I love that part of it. I agree with you there. You know, there's no sector that, you know, I'd be more excited to be working in. It'll be my five year anniversary at Grid next week. Official start date anniversary. I was wrapping a consulting agreement before I joined, so I really started, you know, three or four months before that.  </p>
<p>00:39:22:05 - 00:39:35:13<br>Harry<br>But, you know, but, you know, this is what I've chosen to dedicate my life to, to building, you know, within within a proof of work system and really couldn't be couldn't be happier to get to work on this every day.  </p>
<p>00:39:35:15 - 00:39:59:11<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Got as many wraps. I want to take this on, I guess, since this is a mining focused podcast obviously the having it's about 75 days away which is not that much time. What should miners be doing? What are miners doing to prepare for the having how may it affect mining businesses?  </p>
<p>00:39:59:13 - 00:40:30:23<br>Harry<br>Well, you know, the the the known effect is that the block subsidy is going to get cut in half. I you know, it's bittersweet, right? Like on the one hand, you know we're going to earn less bitcoin as miners unless fees do something quite dramatic than we did the day before. The having happens or the or the block before the having happens is the case really is, you know, but that's the better that the suite is that bitcoins monetary policy gets proven every four years.  </p>
<p>00:40:30:26 - 00:41:10:02<br>Harry<br>So every 210,000 blocks. You know the the the Bitcoin Fed meets and agrees on a new issuance decision and that issuance decision happens programmatically. And so being able to watch the monetary policy happen in real time and with and with, you know, near absolute certainty is one of the most high impact pieces of how Bitcoin works. And getting to see it work in real time is is, you know, is a powerful and meaningful thing that, you know, that's my that's my ideological answer.  </p>
<p>00:41:10:02 - 00:41:33:19<br>Harry<br>But, you know, tactically, I think we've seen a lot of miners across the industry start to roll into higher efficiency machines. I think that's one way to sort of having proof your, you know, your operation is to continue to to invest into the fleets efficiency. Beyond that, you know, we we at least think all the time about, you know, the best way to be prepared for the having is to be cost conscious.  </p>
<p>00:41:33:21 - 00:42:07:10<br>Harry<br>And that starts with the power cost. It really rolls across everything that business spends money on. And so being, you know, laser focused on downside risk and cost is the best tool, you know, available in conjunction with with, you know, managing the fleets efficiency in order to be resilient across a reduction in potential revenue. Now, the purchasing power under the last epoch was greater from a mining revenue perspective than, you know, the purchasing power in the 12.5 Bitcoin block epoch.  </p>
<p>00:42:07:13 - 00:42:46:27<br>Harry<br>And so, you know, we may see a similar dynamic play out across the four years after 75 days from now. So, you know, I think there's there's still a lot of, you know, dynamic components of the market. We haven't even gotten into the expected fee revenues that we might see with additional adoption or additional JPEG degeneracy. However, however you however you might however you might think of it, but at the end of the day, block space is scarce and Bitcoin is an incredible asset to move from point A to point B, And so the fees that folks are willing to pay to move their UTX so I think is a place where, you know, a  </p>
<p>00:42:46:27 - 00:43:12:11<br>Harry<br>huge amount of value is provided by miners securing the movement and the availability of that scarce block space. So, you know, it's a it's a it's a simple topic because the monetary policy is dead simple thanks to Satoshi Knott-craig and and it's also a very complex business operating environment because there's a bunch of moving variables. So it really is a three body problem between fees.  </p>
<p>00:43:12:13 - 00:43:28:20<br>Harry<br>Bitcoin price and network hash rate. So you're you're you're managing a lot of uncertainty around that period of time. But, you know, we pride ourselves to sort of always be having and so, you know we'll start preparing for the having after this one the moment this one happens.  </p>
<p>00:43:28:23 - 00:43:59:08<br>Marty<br>Always be having sage advice That is the environment leading up to this having is different than the two that I've been a part of since I've been following Bitcoin because you have this fee pressure from the JPEGs and all that and it's nothing too crazy right now, but it they get crazier. Oh, that a little under a year ago and at times throughout the last year did provide significant revenues to mining operations.  </p>
<p>00:43:59:08 - 00:44:40:13<br>Marty<br>The price is up 150% since January of last year and it seems like we're hovering in the low forties. The g BTC bleeding seems to be coming to a slow and the ETFs seem to be net buyers of Bitcoin right now potentially into the future. Like is there a situation where fees are pumping, the price is doing really well, they have incomes and you know the situation where it's not as I think cataclysmic is the right word, but it's not a it's not an event that's detrimental to as many operations as it has been in the past.  </p>
<p>00:44:40:20 - 00:44:43:27<br>Marty<br>Something people should be thinking about.  </p>
<p>00:44:43:29 - 00:45:16:04<br>Harry<br>Yeah, I mean, look, like we had we basically had to having last time because we saw price go from whatever, 6500 to 3500 a month and a half before that. And then we bounced back up and then we have so, you know, you can, you can kind of get to having economics multiple different ways. And so if you're not built to be resilient across those different cycles, it's going to be challenging regardless of if it means price getting cut in half or block subsidy getting it cut in half, you know, it's kind of all the same, you know, the same net net from the miners perspective.  </p>
<p>00:45:16:04 - 00:45:48:06<br>Harry<br>So, you know, it's it's going to be dynamic. It's going to be interesting. There's going to be a lot of conversation around it. It's critical to remember that it is beautiful to watch Bitcoin's monetary policy happen algorithmically without you know, without a central, you know, central planner involved. And, you know, and and it's about it's about, you know, survival and putting yourself in a position to be able to thrive, you know, during periods of really constructive mining economics.  </p>
<p>00:45:48:09 - 00:45:54:10<br>Marty<br>First, having where Bitcoin stock to flow would be higher than gold. I wonder if that's some emetic for red.  </p>
<p>00:45:54:10 - 00:45:57:09<br>Harry<br>Dot blue dot green dot.  </p>
<p>00:45:57:11 - 00:46:00:24<br>Marty<br>Is that the is that the ones that they're like oh.  </p>
<p>00:46:00:24 - 00:46:03:22<br>Harry<br>People plan B it's the plan B dots.  </p>
<p>00:46:03:25 - 00:46:06:11<br>Marty<br>Yes we're going all the way up to orange.  </p>
<p>00:46:06:13 - 00:46:08:11<br>Harry<br>And red dot.  </p>
<p>00:46:08:13 - 00:46:28:29<br>Marty<br>Now it is this something as simple as oh people are like wait a second, Bitcoin is now officially more scarce. Some gold from a supply inflation rate that people are like, Oh man, maybe I should get this is 2024 is an interesting year. Another beautiful thing of the halvings they line up perfectly with U.S. presidential election cycles and this one for now.  </p>
<p>00:46:29:05 - 00:46:36:07<br>Harry<br>Unless we have a lot of accelerating or decelerating difficulty adjustments, we could fall of whack. But I don't think we are likely to.  </p>
<p>00:46:36:09 - 00:47:06:03<br>Marty<br>Know that this will be. I mean, we don't like to get political too much on this show, but this seems like it could be a pivotal election for the Bitcoin industry broadly, but specifically the mining industry. It seems like, again, the actions from the EIA last week were dictated down from Elizabeth Warren in a certain capacity, and it seems like this current administration really does not like Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:47:06:05 - 00:47:27:19<br>Marty<br>And I think that's what a lot of people are asking themselves behind closed doors is Dan like, do we need a new administration to just let this industry run then? Do you think back to Trump's first term, if it does turn out to be Trump first byte in which it seems like that is the case? I mean, he wasn't really supportive of Bitcoin either.  </p>
<p>00:47:27:19 - 00:47:56:20<br>Marty<br>Yet Steve mentioned, as is Treasury secretary, you hated Bitcoin. Trump explicitly said that Bitcoin was a threat to the US dollar reserve system. And so even though we don't like having to deal with the political part of life here in the United States as an industry, I think it is becoming abundantly clear that we do have to play the game to some extent just so that they will leave us alone as much as possible.  </p>
<p>00:47:56:22 - 00:48:19:00<br>Harry<br>My Yeah, I'm with you. You know, politics is definitely not my bag, but, you know, the the the goal that I have, I'm always happy to engage with anyone and everyone on this stuff, you know? And and all I want to do is, is, you know, tell them, don't ask me the questions. Ask the people we buy the power from.  </p>
<p>00:48:19:02 - 00:48:44:02<br>Harry<br>What do we do for the community? Are we good? Are we net benefit or you know, are we an asset. I'll never forget the you know, we had a quote from one of the CEOs of the local utility that we, you know, have an operation at. And it was right when inflation was was peaking at 10%. And he called us and he said, you know, when this kind of stuff happens, I'm really left with a couple of choices.  </p>
<p>00:48:44:04 - 00:49:12:17<br>Harry<br>I can sell bonds raised that I can raise rates, I can lower quality of service, or I can go find a Bitcoin miner to bring to my area. Those are the only ways that he had in his mind to fight inflation. And he said of those four options, he would vastly, vastly prefer option four, where there's a differentiated customer that he can recruit to sell power to.  </p>
<p>00:49:12:19 - 00:49:37:25<br>Harry<br>And so it's telling stories like that as many times as we need to to make people understand that, you know, we're not parasites that are that are, you know, suckling on the lifeblood of the American electric system in the economy. We're an asset that pays revenue and that generates, you know, flexible, sustainable load that is an asset to every electric system that we enter so long as the contracts are structured the right way.  </p>
<p>00:49:38:03 - 00:50:10:05<br>Harry<br>And so what that means for us is we just want more flexibility and more credit, both financial and social and political, for the flexibility that we offer. And I don't think that's an unreasonable perspective to take. And we're definitely seeing, you know, a lot of of serious consideration around that value proposition taken up by the technocrats who the actual, you know, generation transmission and delivery services that keep all of our lights on.  </p>
<p>00:50:10:07 - 00:50:12:24<br>Harry<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:50:12:27 - 00:50:18:10<br>Marty<br>Sometimes they have to take a step back because it's so obvious to us. It's like, how do you know? Do you want to see this?  </p>
<p>00:50:18:10 - 00:50:23:19<br>Harry<br>Well, Marty, how do you manufacture a pencil?  </p>
<p>00:50:23:21 - 00:50:25:18<br>Marty<br>It takes many moving parts.  </p>
<p>00:50:25:21 - 00:50:45:28<br>Harry<br>No idea. I've no idea. When I go pick up a pencil, I have no idea how that was made. I assume that the vast majority of people I will ever talk to have the same level of understanding of how the manufacturing process for a pencil works that I that that they do with what happens when you turn the light switch on.  </p>
<p>00:50:46:00 - 00:51:15:09<br>Harry<br>Yeah, right. It's a it's an unknown thing, you know. No, you know I, you know, my, my dad believes that he's reducing, you know, the carbon intensity of our household by turning the thermostat down a degree or two in the summer or in the winter. Right. So like the level of understanding and the level of, of, you know, transparency, you know, he doesn't think that way anymore because I've, you know, locked him in a room and yelled about it long enough.  </p>
<p>00:51:15:11 - 00:51:37:29<br>Harry<br>But, you know, but these are these are topics that are not taught to us as young people. They're they're topics that are wildly esoteric for the vast majority of people, you know, certainly in America, not on planet Earth, nobody knows what happens or why their light switch works. And so that's the that's the fight that I that I'm excited to take on, which is I don't believe that.  </p>
<p>00:51:38:02 - 00:52:04:27<br>Harry<br>Look, I didn't go to school for electrical engineering. I went to school for Keynesian economics. And I somehow shook loose of that of that horrible fate. And and so if I can learn how the electric system works, I have no technical background whatsoever. But I read a bunch of books and asked a lot of dumb questions and and arrived at something approximating a level one understanding of how electricity works in America.  </p>
<p>00:52:05:00 - 00:52:07:06<br>Harry<br>It isn't that hard.  </p>
<p>00:52:07:08 - 00:52:29:01<br>Marty<br>Now that I seriously been thinking about this reason, like we need in terms of curriculum, like people should know money works and people should know how energy works. Like that should be high school classes mandatory, know how your money works, know how your energy systems work because they are the best base layer of the economy. They're going to go out in the world and try to be productive in.  </p>
<p>00:52:29:03 - 00:52:30:07<br>Marty<br>And the fact that I.  </p>
<p>00:52:30:11 - 00:52:38:13<br>Harry<br>I swear I didn't set you up for this, but but Grid's mission statement is to to build a generational company at the intersection of energy and money.  </p>
<p>00:52:38:15 - 00:52:39:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:52:39:18 - 00:52:49:12<br>Harry<br>It's that's our goal. Our goal is to build a company that sits right on that street corner. Energy going this way, money going that way. Right on the corner is grid and Bitcoin mining.  </p>
<p>00:52:49:15 - 00:52:53:17<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it's happening. It's going to be a long journey. Not for grid.  </p>
<p>00:52:53:18 - 00:52:54:03<br>Harry<br>For young man.  </p>
<p>00:52:54:03 - 00:52:54:20<br>Marty<br>All of us.  </p>
<p>00:52:54:20 - 00:52:56:12<br>Harry<br>For young men.  </p>
<p>00:52:56:14 - 00:53:00:09<br>Marty<br>And you see this airline, it's it's not getting any it's not.  </p>
<p>00:53:00:09 - 00:53:01:09<br>Harry<br>Coming back LeBron to.  </p>
<p>00:53:01:09 - 00:53:25:21<br>Marty<br>My eyebrows that's true. It's true. Um, one other topic I want to talk about with the emergence of the ETFs, how do you think that affects stocks like MicroStrategy and public mining stocks that have historically been used as a way to get exposure to Bitcoin without direct exposure via public markets?  </p>
<p>00:53:25:24 - 00:53:58:15<br>Harry<br>I mean, look, I think that I think that we saw we have evidence now, right? We saw the ETF come out and we saw a bunch of those stocks, especially MicroStrategy, go down. I think MicroStrategy was viewed basically as a holding company for Bitcoin. Now they deserve some premium because they're able to lever into some bitcoin. You know, I love I forget who did this analysis on on XCOM, but they basically looked at the you know, the SATs per share that you own if you own, you know, stock in MicroStrategy.  </p>
<p>00:53:58:15 - 00:54:22:01<br>Harry<br>And that number actually goes up based on the way that that they've issued new stock and bought Bitcoin with it. So I think there's there's some interesting sort of deeper fundamental analysis that's going to go into the decision to own, you know, a stock like MicroStrategy versus a share of of what we'll talk about the bitwise folks we like that be and we like, you know, the ark folks and have relationships across there.  </p>
<p>00:54:22:01 - 00:54:43:21<br>Harry<br>But I love that they're funding developers out of those management fees. And, you know, I think we've seen you know, we've seen the premium come out of microstrategy's to a large degree and enter, you know, ETF land. I Think the miners are a more interesting case and I just look at them broadly but I think it's an opposite it's an opportunity for differentiation.  </p>
<p>00:54:43:28 - 00:55:03:11<br>Harry<br>Right. You're taking sort of some of the market data into a different vehicle, but maybe that means there's more room for the market alpha for a differentiated operator to, you know, to really show their chops or many of them to show different chops. You know, there's a lot of different kind of operating models across the different pub codes that are out there.  </p>
<p>00:55:03:13 - 00:55:26:23<br>Harry<br>But yeah, I mean, it's it's an opportunity to demonstrate differentiation and, you know, attract people to those names or explain to people why, you know, being able to generate revenue in Bitcoin terms and, and do so on a profitable or highly profitable basis is a compelling equity investment. And so maybe they can get looked at more like companies and less like Bitcoin, you know, holding companies.  </p>
<p>00:55:26:25 - 00:56:04:20<br>Marty<br>Yes, I completely agree. Which is good for the market too. That particularly the differentiation that's going to be necessary to set your self apart in the world of public markets, you under clocking strategies that getting more ingrained with demand response systems, becoming energy providers, maybe getting acquired by an energy provider, becoming part of that stack, people are going to get creative, which should be a forcing function for a more efficient mining industry and a more healthy Bitcoin overall at the end of the day.  </p>
<p>00:56:04:22 - 00:56:28:01<br>Harry<br>And and a more and a more fulfilled investment community. Right. Like, you know, I think there's a lot of sort of well, as the ETF like bad for bitcoin I'm like I don't know I like when people have access to more choices right at the end of the day, like I don't know somebody's personal situation and maybe the ETF is the most, you know, obvious and greatest thing in the world for them.  </p>
<p>00:56:28:04 - 00:56:46:07<br>Harry<br>It's not how I would choose to get exposure to Bitcoin, you know, for me, because I can't, you know, engage in and, you know, the self-sovereign component of it. But, you know, but I'm sure there's lots of people out there who that's a much more constructive product and they want the price exposure to Bitcoin and that's really meaningful for them and that's great.  </p>
<p>00:56:46:09 - 00:57:06:15<br>Harry<br>So I think any time that that, you know, the market's able to make better, more informed and broader choices across, you know, a broader range of vehicles, like I think that's net positive and is in keeping with sort of the the, you know, the libertarian on my shoulder which says that, you know, people deserve more choices and more freedom to choose and that's positive.  </p>
<p>00:57:06:15 - 00:57:28:10<br>Harry<br>And then ultimately the market over time will will, you know, move away from being a voting machine and moving back towards a weighing machine. And and you know that. And that's where sort of the truth gets to be, you know, litigated which is which is in the market for ideas first in the market for, you know, for financial outcomes second.  </p>
<p>00:57:28:13 - 00:57:43:05<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Which is a perfect segue way into how well we can end it on, which is the fact that you joined 1031 as an advisor as well. We've been talking behind the scenes for, gosh feels like years now, but it's official.  </p>
<p>00:57:43:05 - 00:57:46:12<br>Harry<br>It has been years and confirm.  </p>
<p>00:57:46:15 - 00:58:09:23<br>Marty<br>It's official now. And that is our our goal, our aim, our mission is to go out and find the entrepreneurs that are building out the critical Bitcoin infrastructure that will lead us to a Bitcoin standard, make it easier for people to access Bitcoin, to use Bitcoin to leverage Bitcoin to mine Bitcoin, whatever it may be, and to give the market more options.  </p>
<p>00:58:09:23 - 00:58:37:07<br>Marty<br>At the end of the day. And we're extremely excited to officially have you on board. And I think the opportunity that lays before us at 1031 specifically is extremely exciting as well. I said mining is the most exciting industry and I truly believe that. But having the luxury of getting a view into every other sector of the Bitcoin economy is extremely rewarding as well.  </p>
<p>00:58:37:07 - 00:58:41:22<br>Marty<br>And I couldn't be happier to have you on board to advise.  </p>
<p>00:58:41:22 - 00:59:08:17<br>Harry<br>I couldn't be happier. I couldn't be happier. No, I think, you know, any any time you get to work with a market leader, you take it right. You guys have done have done so much hard work, you know, John. Jonathan Grant You know. O'Dell And you obviously as well as as well as all the LP's, you know, have just done a phenomenal job putting together a really thoughtful and mature, you know, investment platform.  </p>
<p>00:59:08:17 - 00:59:34:18<br>Harry<br>Obviously, that's skewed significantly towards venture thus far because I think, you know, Bitcoin is still in in venture land where, you know, the biggest companies are being built are yet to be built. They haven't you know, they haven't reached maturation by any stretch, you know, thrilled to obviously be a portfolio company at GRID. But but for me, like what's most exciting is getting to work with it's used to work with founders, right?  </p>
<p>00:59:34:18 - 01:00:00:19<br>Harry<br>The startup journey is not like any you know, nobody nobody could have told me what it was going to be like on the way in. And we're not done yet by any stretch, obviously. So getting to share, you know, the hard lessons, the good lessons, you know, what did we do right? What did we do wrong from along the way with other founders and being able to kind of take the the you know, the the the long the long, dark night of the soul type of call.  </p>
<p>01:00:00:21 - 01:00:21:03<br>Harry<br>You know, that's what was really exciting to me because it's really hard. And, you know, being a founder or a co-founder of an early stage company can be extremely isolating. And so having some, you know, folks in the been there done that club who can sit alongside you and hold your hand when when you're facing kind of the toughest pieces.  </p>
<p>01:00:21:05 - 01:00:43:28<br>Harry<br>That's so, so exciting to me getting to work with you guys on, you know, on fundraising and on and on allocations like all of that kind of stuff is something that, you know, that I'm tremendously passionate about, along with, you know, working directly with founders. So, you know, couldn't couldn't be happier, couldn't be a more symbiotic relationship between Grid and 1031 and between me and 1031.  </p>
<p>01:00:43:28 - 01:00:46:03<br>Harry<br>So thrilled to be here.  </p>
<p>01:00:46:06 - 01:01:13:20<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I that's another thing that is really unique about the position that we're in. This is Bitcoiners more broadly, but 1031 specifically, yes, we're a venture fund, the portfolio, the portfolio of companies that we've allocated to. But in your incumbent venture space, it's usually spray and pray across many different verticals, many different subsectors of companies doing wildly different things.  </p>
<p>01:01:13:20 - 01:01:52:18<br>Marty<br>But with the focus that we have a 1031 on Bitcoin specifically, it enables us to sort of enable the portfolio companies to help each other out where they can and to give that advice obviously very small industry right now. But you have a very large goal and very similar problems. I mean last year to Bear Claw portfolio retreat, I mean the topic of the year was banking relationships and that's something that Bitcoin companies have been targeted, Whether it's explicit or implicit is for for others to determine.  </p>
<p>01:01:52:18 - 01:02:13:10<br>Marty<br>But wasn't isn't easy. Still, for many companies to get banking or banking relationships in the space and just having a focus and being able to have this cross-pollination of ideas and experiences among portfolio companies is something that I think is unique to what we're doing here.  </p>
<p>01:02:13:13 - 01:02:42:11<br>Harry<br>And this is catchy, but I'll say it anyway, which is like Bitcoin is a social hack where when I meet other Bitcoiners, I'm like 90% of the way towards friends. When I meet other Bitcoin entrepreneurs, I'm like 97% of the way towards friends. So, you know, being, you know, being able to kind of self-select into a group of people who are convicted enough to be, you know, to be bitcoiners in the first place, but then convicted and asked to build companies around Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:02:42:13 - 01:03:00:02<br>Harry<br>It's just rarefied air, whether you're a portfolio company of 1031 or not. I just think, you know, the founders and employees at Bitcoin companies are a pretty special breed and and it's just it's just the most the most gratifying thing to get to be around those kinds of people all the time.  </p>
<p>01:03:00:04 - 01:03:05:11<br>Marty<br>You got to be a little crazy. Just get I like crazy. It's a.  </p>
<p>01:03:05:13 - 01:03:06:28<br>Harry<br>You know. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:03:07:03 - 01:03:12:07<br>Marty<br>Oh yeah, yeah. You can tell that is this was this.  </p>
<p>01:03:12:07 - 01:03:14:16<br>Harry<br>Was a Marty Jones free episode.  </p>
<p>01:03:14:19 - 01:03:16:27<br>Marty<br>I I've got the white collared shirt on.  </p>
<p>01:03:16:28 - 01:03:18:10<br>Harry<br>You got the button down on.  </p>
<p>01:03:18:12 - 01:03:29:15<br>Marty<br>I've got the button down on. I've got two buttons unbuttoned here and a little loose. But that's it. It's Monday morning. It's Monday afternoon now. The morning flew by yesterday.  </p>
<p>01:03:29:15 - 01:03:30:07<br>Harry<br>Ran away.  </p>
<p>01:03:30:10 - 01:03:44:12<br>Marty<br>Keeping Marty Jones in the cage for this one. Uh, what haven't we talked about? That's on top of your mind. I think maybe we should cover it. Doesn't have to be mining related. Could be Bitcoin related.  </p>
<p>01:03:44:14 - 01:04:14:20<br>Harry<br>I mean, I think, you know, I think this is this is a good kind of time to remember that, you know, lower your time preference. Bitcoin comes at you super fast and so cherish these days of like quiet in the markets, you know, you know, it's great to be bouncing between 38 K and 45 K or you know, 42 and 43 like these are these are calm waters that we're in right now and they won't stay calm forever.  </p>
<p>01:04:14:22 - 01:04:26:05<br>Harry<br>So, you know, cherish the cherish the peace of mind that you got, you know, on these kinds of days. And and, you know, remember that Bitcoin is the longest game we've ever gotten to play.  </p>
<p>01:04:26:07 - 01:04:31:00<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it gets crazy when the price starts having.  </p>
<p>01:04:31:02 - 01:04:33:12<br>Harry<br>Focused productivity down, price up.  </p>
<p>01:04:33:14 - 01:05:03:26<br>Marty<br>Well, anybody out there building a company, humbly stacking sets, just prepare for the distractions. Mentally prepare, especially if you're running a company. Let your employees know that your team. Now things are going to get crazy. You're going to get the pull of distraction, pulling you day in and day out. So we're getting large green candles, large red candles up into the right, buckle down and try to focus.  </p>
<p>01:05:03:28 - 01:05:08:15<br>Harry<br>Anticipating exactly when.  </p>
<p>01:05:08:15 - 01:05:11:27<br>Marty<br>It comes, because we got we've got a lot to build.  </p>
<p>01:05:12:00 - 01:05:16:13<br>Harry<br>We've got a lot to build. Harry future on build itself.  </p>
<p>01:05:16:16 - 01:05:19:29<br>Marty<br>It's not takes individuals like you.  </p>
<p>01:05:20:02 - 01:05:20:25<br>Harry<br>And you.  </p>
<p>01:05:20:27 - 01:05:36:08<br>Marty<br>Many other people out there. We're doing it though. We're winning. Yeah. People working out here in the Commons working hard. You're in Nashville. The park is full partner, not there. But I was on a call with somebody earlier at the park and I saw it was full. We're doing it.  </p>
<p>01:05:36:14 - 01:05:54:05<br>Harry<br>I went in there. I went in there. I had I had to do a little bit of stuff last night. I got I got to the park at like 8:00 and there were like six cars there and there were like two conference rooms lit up. People were working. Like the state of our network is strong. This is what winning looks like.  </p>
<p>01:05:54:08 - 01:06:09:05<br>Harry<br>It's Bitcoiners who can't sleep on a Sunday and have to grind on their next, whether it's their next release or their next slide deck prep or whatever. Like they're grinding and our enemies aren't. And so we're going out working.  </p>
<p>01:06:09:08 - 01:06:13:05<br>Marty<br>The momentum is building. It's going to be a good year.  </p>
<p>01:06:13:07 - 01:06:14:17<br>Harry<br>Harry. Good year.  </p>
<p>01:06:14:20 - 01:06:20:23<br>Marty<br>Thank you for joining me. We can't wait two years for the next episode. That is to answer.  </p>
<p>01:06:20:25 - 01:06:24:09<br>Harry<br>Well, we'll put it on the calendar. Less than two years.  </p>
<p>01:06:24:11 - 01:06:28:19<br>Marty<br>Yes, less than two years. You heard it here first. That's all we got today for X peace, love.</p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:image href="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/480-Harry-Sudock.png"/>
      </item>
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Socialist Attack On Bitcoin Mining | Jason Brett]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[In this emergency podcast episode of TFTC, Marty Bent and Jason Brett discuss a sudden and concerning move by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) under the Department of Energy, which has issued a survey requesting detailed information from the bitcoin mining industry. ]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this emergency podcast episode of TFTC, Marty Bent and Jason Brett discuss a sudden and concerning move by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) under the Department of Energy, which has issued a survey requesting detailed information from the bitcoin mining industry. ]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 21:48:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iofederal-government-attack-on-bitcoin-mining-jason-brett/</link>
      <comments>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iofederal-government-attack-on-bitcoin-mining-jason-brett/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qpyxsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7en9v3jhyctv94nk7an9wfhx6etwwskkzar5v93kktt0dckky6t5vdhkjm3dd45ku6twvukk5ctndahz6cnjv468gtczyq5zg6hwmdnu57e9q89ktqxuqt939vpv4t8draefhdset5rzkyy26qcyqqq823cp5mqm3</guid>
      <category>TFTC Podcast</category>
      
        <media:content url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/479-Jason-Brett.png" medium="image"/>
        <enclosure 
          url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/479-Jason-Brett.png" length="0" 
          type="image/png" 
        />
      <noteId>naddr1qpyxsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7en9v3jhyctv94nk7an9wfhx6etwwskkzar5v93kktt0dckky6t5vdhkjm3dd45ku6twvukk5ctndahz6cnjv468gtczyq5zg6hwmdnu57e9q89ktqxuqt939vpv4t8draefhdset5rzkyy26qcyqqq823cp5mqm3</noteId>
      <npub>npub19qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksn4zc3g</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrib]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/federal-government-attack-on-bitcoin-mining-jason-brett/">Read original post</a></p>
<h2>Key Takeaways</h2>
<p>In this emergency podcast episode of TFTC, Marty Bent and Jason Brett discuss a sudden and concerning move by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) under the Department of Energy, which has issued a survey requesting detailed information from the bitcoin mining industry. The survey, which was pushed through quickly and without much notice, has raised alarm due to its extensive data demands, including the longitude and latitude coordinates of mining operations.</p>
<p>Jason Brett, serving as an advisor to the Bitcoin Policy Institute and a seasoned figure in the space, sheds light on the federal landscape surrounding bitcoin policy. He explains the potential legal issues associated with the survey, such as Fourth Amendment violations, and the broader implications for industry regulation.</p>
<p>The conversation touches upon the history of federal interest in bitcoin, starting from President Biden’s executive order on digital assets, which raised environmental concerns about proof of work systems, to Senator Elizabeth Warren’s push for more scrutiny of bitcoin mining’s energy consumption. Brett also discusses the Supreme Court case of West Virginia vs. EPA, which could challenge the EIA's survey as it targets a specific industry based on ESG considerations.</p>
<p>Marty and Jason consider the necessity of solidarity within the bitcoin mining industry to respond to this "attack vector" and suggest that legal representation is essential for those dealing with the survey. They also explore the potential for states to protect their interests against federal overreach and the importance of building grassroots support and lobbying efforts to safeguard bitcoin’s future in the U.S.</p>
<h2>Links</h2>
<p>Follow Jason on <a href="https://twitter.com/RegulatoryJason?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>Check out the <a href="https://www.btcpolicy.org/?ref=tftc.io">Bitcoin Policy Institute</a></p>
<h2>Sponsors</h2>
<h2>Sponsors</h2>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h2>Best Quotes</h2>
<ol>
<li>"We don't just have to comply. And I think there needs to be some congressional light shed on why was this emergency announced." – Jason Brett_Context: Discussing the need for Congressional intervention to question the EIA's emergency authorization._</li>
<li>"This is about a form. And if this is your state and local... this is just a classic case of federal overreach." – Jason Brett_Context: Considering the potential for state governments to challenge the federal government’s intrusive demands on bitcoin miners._</li>
<li>"It's not like a friendly visit from your postal service person. This is like coming from a place of investigation." – Jason Brett_Context: Describing the intimidating nature of the EIA's survey and its implications for bitcoin miners._</li>
<li>"We're not going to get to your goals in 2050. It's going to destroy the planet, which Elizabeth Warren has said as much in some hearings. We have to stop bitcoin. It's destroying the planet." – Jason Brett_Context: Highlighting the extreme views of some policymakers on bitcoin's environmental impact._</li>
<li>"It's literally a physical attack vector that can be pinpointed and attacked." – Marty Bent_Context: Marty Bent explaining why mining has become the focus of regulatory scrutiny._</li>
<li>"As bitcoin gets bigger, I think we're going to need that at some point to make it so we don't have these overbearing type actions." – Jason Brett_Context: Discussing the need for a strong, organized bitcoin community to influence policy._</li>
<li>"The rent is too damn high. The government is too damn big too. Get out of our life." – Marty Bent <em>Context: Expressing frustration at government overreach and the desire for autonomy.</em></li>
</ol>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The podcast episode serves as an urgent call to action for the bitcoin mining community and highlights a critical moment where both legal and grassroots efforts are necessary to counteract potential regulatory overreach. The EIA's emergency survey, which demands extensive and intrusive data from miners, represents a significant threat to the industry's privacy rights and operational freedom. Marty Bent and Jason Brett discuss the need for industry solidarity, legal defense, and political lobbying to ensure that this does not set a precedent for future regulation.</p>
<p>The episode also emphasizes the potential role of state governments in defending their economic interests against federal intrusion, as well as the importance of conveying the human and innovative aspects of bitcoin mining to policymakers. Ultimately, the overarching message is one of resilience and the belief that, despite the challenges, the bitcoin community has the power and resources to overcome these adversarial actions and continue to thrive in the United States.</p>
<h2>Timestamps</h2>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>6:17 - Overview on “emergency” survey<br>15:03 - Clearly an overt state attack<br>21:45 - Fighting back<br>30:21 - Upcoming months<br>32:30 - Energy industry and policy<br>39:29 - Failure of ESG<br>46:31 - Making political progress<br>52:20 - Federal vs State<br>58:12 - Wrapping up</p>
<h2>Transcript</h2>
<p>00:00:02:13 - 00:00:05:23<br>Marty<br>And we are live. Jason, Brett, welcome to the show.  </p>
<p>00:00:05:25 - 00:00:08:03<br>Jason<br>Marty, how you doing? Good to be here.  </p>
<p>00:00:08:05 - 00:00:37:04<br>Marty<br>Doing well. This is a bit of an emergency podcast we've thrown together in response to the IEA's survey requests for the Bitcoin mining industry. It seems to be driven by the Department of Energy, rushed through rather quickly over the last couple of weeks. Who? Someone is calling me here. Ignore that. Yeah. And it came out of nowhere, it seems.  </p>
<p>00:00:37:06 - 00:00:57:10<br>Marty<br>And it is forcing the industry, the Bitcoin mining industry, to formulate a response rather quickly. I think before we make any assumptions and just maybe describe what you've been working on on the policy front, your experience and how you're viewing this, the survey, this registry, if you will.  </p>
<p>00:00:57:12 - 00:01:27:10<br>Jason<br>Yeah, So I'm an advisor to the Bitcoin Policy Institute and I've been in the space for about seven years now. I think in terms of the policy in considering Bitcoin mining, there really has not yet been anything on the federal level regarding agencies doing anything. And the start of the federal policy on Bitcoin in general kicked off with an executive order two years ago.  </p>
<p>00:01:27:12 - 00:02:07:28<br>Jason<br>Executive order from Biden on digital assets. Part of that was concerns about sustainability. ESG It's important for people to remember President Biden is a it's his top priority right now about concerns about the environment. So part of this looked into the energy use of proof of work systems and they talked in that if you read through the executive order, one of the findings was that maybe the, you know, these agencies, federal agencies, could guide state and local partners on potential alternatives to proof of work, as well as looking at the energy consumption and better understanding it.  </p>
<p>00:02:08:01 - 00:02:27:17<br>Jason<br>So what you have is you have an executive order two years ago that's saying we need to learn more about Bitcoin mining. We need to understand more. And at that time the Bitcoin Policy Institute responded. We had talked to people in the White House about the program and there was good, good feedback. Trey Cross had been the lead really on that.  </p>
<p>00:02:27:17 - 00:03:02:03<br>Jason<br>As you know, Troy is really the master of this area. But what you had was and forgive the DC speak for your listeners, but kind of you had what's called a soliloquy, which is where Elizabeth Warren writes a letter saying, I think these agencies should start to look into what Bitcoin miners are doing at the federal level. And, you know, the mining contingent, if you remember Michael Saylor and I think a few other major players went and talked to the, you know, Department of Energy saying, look, this is a little overblown.  </p>
<p>00:03:02:03 - 00:03:22:15<br>Jason<br>We don't know if this is the right angle. But as we know now, this EIA has now decided on this emergency basis. And I say emergency lightly because you've explored and I've explored, too, these are very well thought out survey questions like, I mean, for an emergency, it's like they put together these these well-thought out questions and thoughts.  </p>
<p>00:03:22:17 - 00:03:50:08<br>Jason<br>So I think it would have taken at least a few weeks to put together. But now what they call an emergency to look into the amount of energy that Bitcoin mining is used. And they say things like the Bitcoin mining price. So what? And we now know because we saw the EIA put out on its website yesterday, not only information about why they were doing it, which is when I call it a soliloquy, that's the response to saying We hear you, Senator Warren.  </p>
<p>00:03:50:08 - 00:04:16:29<br>Jason<br>We're doing what you're asking. We're trying to find out all this information about how much energy Bitcoin miners are using. But the other thing that besides that response is they already started giving data of their own analysis of how much energy Bitcoin mining is using. So in a matter of 24 hours, Marty, we've gone from we need to explore in an emergency basis how much energy Bitcoin mining is using to within 24 hours.  </p>
<p>00:04:16:29 - 00:04:38:11<br>Jason<br>The agency putting up the website, all these numbers and data they've explored saying bitcoin energy is really bad. So at a minimum I think there's well, there's lots of concerns, but the baseline concern is that there's a bit of confirmation bias because they're assuming that it's bad for the environment. So this survey to them might just result in saying, yes, we agree it's bad for the environment.  </p>
<p>00:04:38:13 - 00:05:03:20<br>Jason<br>The real concern and it's a legal matter has to do something called West Virginia versus EPA. And I say that because that's a really important Supreme Court decision. We've heard president candidate when he was running Vivek Ramaswamy say is probably one of most important court decisions in our time as it relates to Bitcoin, because it specifically prohibits the agency from doing exactly what it's doing.  </p>
<p>00:05:03:20 - 00:05:33:29<br>Jason<br>So what it means is it can't focus on a particular industry based on like ESG. So it can't just go after an industry saying, we think there's too many problems with the environment of what your industry is doing. And the Supreme Court, highest court in the land in West Virginia versus EPA, you know, West Virginia, one. And basically what that means is the letters that Senator Warren sent encouraging this agency to do this is probably in violation of that finding by the Supreme Court.  </p>
<p>00:05:34:01 - 00:06:03:21<br>Jason<br>And so people are now being told, as you pointed out, like if you're a Bitcoin miner and you see these letters, it's like under criminal law, if you don't report or whatever. But it's very possible this whole exercise is what the EIA is doing, could could be challenged in court and we could potentially get a stay on what they're doing or it'd be overturned because it was made very clear, again and by the Supreme Court, you know, you can't do this to an industry just on the energy side alone.  </p>
<p>00:06:03:24 - 00:06:17:28<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And we were talking before we hit record, this is somewhat of an unprecedented attack on a particular industry via emergency authorization authorization that was pushed through is that correct in your mind? Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:06:18:00 - 00:06:22:12<br>Jason<br>Yeah. I've never seen this at this level happen.  </p>
<p>00:06:22:15 - 00:06:55:29<br>Marty<br>That and I was talking to Reed Browning from Cathedra. He's a CTO at Cathedral, a mining company, and he was actually ex Department of Energy and he's pretty convinced that this was definitely pushed from above the EIA, from above the Department of Energy, because when you look at when the survey was proposed on January 24th and when it was approved, which is January 26, like something happening that quickly within the U.S. federal government really never happens.  </p>
<p>00:06:56:02 - 00:07:05:06<br>Marty<br>And so it seems like they've been planning this behind the scenes, just getting their ducks in a row before actually pushing this forward.  </p>
<p>00:07:05:08 - 00:07:25:25<br>Jason<br>Yeah. I mean, they invoke the emergency basis for them to execute it in the way they're doing it. But again, you look at those surveys and those questions, it's pretty evident that there was some time, considerable time put together. You know, one thing I've been thinking about with this, too, is this would almost be never tolerated in any other industry.  </p>
<p>00:07:25:27 - 00:07:46:25<br>Jason<br>And sorry for any Detroit Lions fans, but it's kind of like being a Lions fan where you've never won the Super Bowl. We're all kind of, you know, you're a nice guy. I'm a nice guy, But but there's this sense of like, you know, if this was the NRA, this this would be shut down already, Right? If they said we're going to do a survey, figure out how many guns all Americans have, you know, the NRA would be at the White House.  </p>
<p>00:07:46:27 - 00:08:21:05<br>Jason<br>And I think there's a certain degree of like where we need to start thinking as a as a community, as bitcoiners. You know, we hold a lot more power than we realize. You know, people reach out if we figure out ways of influencing and doing advocacy, you know, we can get this to go well. The only reason that we're even talking about this and that it's likely next week, in my opinion, this is going to start this process of because they said February to June start going around and asking information is there really isn't enough powerful force to kind of stand in their way to stop them from doing it, You know, and that's that's  </p>
<p>00:08:21:05 - 00:08:40:23<br>Jason<br>the problem with this with new industry and there's this element of we've starting to think about how Bitcoin could change the world and how it might affect things in government. And, you know, a lot of people don't like that. And this is this is an attack vector that I have to say, unfortunately, like this is Elizabeth Warren has executed this one pretty well.  </p>
<p>00:08:40:23 - 00:08:47:24<br>Jason<br>And unfortunately, it's obvious from this that it's not going away. It's something we have to figure out an answer to.  </p>
<p>00:08:47:27 - 00:09:14:24<br>Marty<br>And so I want to talk about what we can do it as a response. But first, let's dive into the details of the survey. Is there any Fourth Amendment protection? Because it seems like this is a pretty egregious affront to privacy rights of individuals and corporations. It's literally asking mining companies to go to their electricity providers and have their electricity providers dox information to them about their other customers.  </p>
<p>00:09:14:26 - 00:09:23:12<br>Marty<br>They're no the overall percentage that the bitcoin miners are using with their overall capacity.  </p>
<p>00:09:23:14 - 00:09:48:18<br>Jason<br>Yeah, I, I chuckle because you know, we talk about Operation Choke point we've seen that about like the banks trying to cut off like I've been thinking this is like operation pull the plug like let's go to all the electricity providers so who's giving the energy to Bitcoin and then give the government the ability to like, you know, chase them away from from diverting all this energy to this unimportant project?  </p>
<p>00:09:48:20 - 00:10:15:11<br>Jason<br>The survey that the idea is that it definitely it talks about a commercial crypto asset miner and what that's a tricky one because you said it yourself, individuals or businesses. You know, I have a few Bitcoin miners in my downstairs, right? I mean, do I does that mean that if if I get this survey or it says all need to report, like at what point am I a commercial endeavor?  </p>
<p>00:10:15:15 - 00:10:47:02<br>Jason<br>Right. And there are EPA rules about pollution that certain industries have to comply with. But this this is likely a Fourth Amendment violation because it's it's probing for information. Right. And it's asking specific, like you say, asking for the electricity providers and the names, the electricity providers and giving just just downright like information about your business that may be a competitive factor that you don't necessarily want to part with.  </p>
<p>00:10:47:04 - 00:11:09:00<br>Jason<br>So it it crosses it. It's a it's a challenge for anybody. Like for me, I have to think about and say, well, does this apply to me? I mean, I have half a dozen miners downstairs, but like, am I a commercial miner? Do I just need to fill out this form in case? So there's a question of the who who does this apply to?  </p>
<p>00:11:09:02 - 00:11:32:04<br>Jason<br>Because it's certainly casting a wide net, but it absolutely is a Fourth Amendment violation. Because think about it, what if they what if you're talking about like mining like something or doing something with computers? And they said, we need to know how much energy your computer is using. And like, everybody has to tell you. So it seems hard to believe that it wouldn't violate that that constitutional protection that we have.  </p>
<p>00:11:32:06 - 00:11:39:04<br>Marty<br>I mean, they literally want the longitude, latitude coordinates of all your operations.  </p>
<p>00:11:39:07 - 00:11:58:23<br>Jason<br>And, you know, and that's what I'm trying to understand, because we saw that map, right, that showed 56 Bitcoin miners. So it feel like do they already know the coordinates anyway? And they just because because then you run the trouble of then you answer this form and what if you get it wrong and they then hold you in violation because you didn't answer truthfully.  </p>
<p>00:11:58:25 - 00:12:26:28<br>Jason<br>So we had a latitude and longitude is is pretty, pretty priceless. But but I mean talk about a surveillance state. It's it's we've we've reached this this is we've we've departed from the the the idea of you know, we think the U.S. is against bitcoin mining. You know we know some senators have a problem with it, too. Like this is when we actually see sort of the state at work.  </p>
<p>00:12:27:00 - 00:12:50:23<br>Jason<br>And I mean, this form, you know, you have to either what, mail it or or fax it back or something. You can't even really it's just clearly they have an operation for it. But I mean, this is I think there's some questions people need to ask that starts with is like, what does this mean? Like when people come and talk to you, you know, should you even talk to them?  </p>
<p>00:12:50:23 - 00:13:17:18<br>Jason<br>She say, I need a lawyer first, you know, like just don't I think you have to I think it's going to require everybody to get legal representation to answer this form properly to avoid any problems with the law. Later. And that's when you're papering an industry to death, which is unfortunate. But we've never But to be honest, I mean, really, Marty, like I'm I'm saying all this and at the same time, I'm I'm slightly at a loss for words because this is really new territory.  </p>
<p>00:13:17:18 - 00:13:30:21<br>Jason<br>I just I can't ever. Can you think in your lifetime of an industry being sort of this this collection process is just targeted And I just know I don't think anyone's ever heard of this before, so.  </p>
<p>00:13:30:24 - 00:13:50:19<br>Marty<br>Not in the United States. But we do have one example of another government doing this throughout Bitcoin's history, and that's Venezuela. They collected all this data and then took all the information and quickly confiscated everybody's miners to mine for themselves. Yeah, it's just something that everybody should be worried about.  </p>
<p>00:13:50:21 - 00:14:17:10<br>Jason<br>Yeah, And look, we already know the U.S. has confiscated a lot of Bitcoin, like in Mt. Gox. We don't know to the degree that they mined themselves. But I do think that what's critical here is that they're talking about in that memo that we saw today on the EIA website, concerns about, you know, this is what's happening in the United States because China shut off its Bitcoin mining.  </p>
<p>00:14:17:10 - 00:14:49:18<br>Jason<br>And so, you know, we know it's a growing issue in the U.S. And so there's clear policy reasons behind it. You know that everyone's come to the U.S. now, you know, to mine. And I think that the the real danger here is like once they set up the registry and they've collected this information, what like next steps they're going to take, and that's like you said, there's the confiscation.  </p>
<p>00:14:49:18 - 00:15:19:11<br>Jason<br>But in this case, is it extra taxes for using the energy? And it's so it's it's the problem. I think that is it's the once you have that registry set up and people just start complying with this just by complying with it, it makes it looks like we think there's a problem. Right. So that's that's why I think that setting up this registry, like what could the next step be?  </p>
<p>00:15:19:11 - 00:15:30:20<br>Jason<br>I don't think it's confiscating the miners. I think to them it's like shutting it off because they want to decarbonize, you know, the planet. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:15:30:22 - 00:16:04:02<br>Marty<br>And it's it's weird, too, because a lot of the information they're projecting to want to understand better is already disclosed by many of the public miners, particularly and even some private miners, particularly those participating in demand response programs. I mean, just two weeks ago, we had a -4% difficulty adjustment because miners were participating in demand response to send electricity back to the grid, making it more stable and creating a more stable pricing environment for residential consumers.  </p>
<p>00:16:04:02 - 00:16:24:04<br>Marty<br>And yeah, it is an overt attack feels that way. It certainly is that way. If it smells, walks like a duck, sounds like a duck, smells like a duck at the duck. And I guess that's a question. I mean, I wrote my newsletter. I've stayed up pretty late. I was a little tired, a little aggressive in my wording.  </p>
<p>00:16:24:04 - 00:16:56:24<br>Marty<br>But I think personally, I would say we should not comply, shouldn't fill this out at all. Everybody, like you said, should get legal representation and fight this. And that's because over the last three days now two days, I've been having conversations with different people in the industry. And that's I think we should use this platform to say like it seems like there's a number of people ranging from the largest miners in the country to small private miners that are having these individual conversations.  </p>
<p>00:16:56:24 - 00:17:21:23<br>Marty<br>And there needs to be some way for everybody to get together and have a coordinated action together in solidarity against this, because I think there could definitely be individual actors who want to be the ones who fight this fight. But I do think there's a need for solidarity across the industry to fight this this particular aggression.  </p>
<p>00:17:21:26 - 00:17:43:00<br>Jason<br>Yeah, And I think that like that word and I read your newsletter and it could, you know, feel your scent sense of it. And I think you're right. Like when you started to say at first maybe this seemed like a positive thing, right? Like they want to learn more information, but as you look more and understand the purpose of it, it doesn't seem like it's just simply, you know, let's do a fact finding mission.  </p>
<p>00:17:43:00 - 00:18:04:13<br>Jason<br>And of course, the problem is we don't kind of cooperate then where they can say, well, see, they have all this stuff to hide, even though we're doing things like helping balancing the grid, that the funny thing is think about this for a second. Like, what's your least favorite U.S. agency of of all or most Americans? What would you say that the agency they dislike the most?  </p>
<p>00:18:04:15 - 00:18:07:23<br>Marty<br>MM The IRS.  </p>
<p>00:18:07:25 - 00:18:34:13<br>Jason<br>Perfect. So even with the IRS, when you and I file taxes, it's not about this mandatory compliance that if you get if you don't get your taxes perfect, you're going to like go to jail. It's I'm reporting based on what my records are. And then if there's a problem, you can come in and audit me. What I don't understand is if they really genuinely wanted to figure out what this process was of how the energy is used by Bitcoin, miners have it be a self-reporting mechanism.  </p>
<p>00:18:34:13 - 00:18:57:15<br>Jason<br>You know, just like you report in your taxes. Like I said, no one likes to even do that. But as the miners send in the information, don't send out, you know, this form saying it's mandatory. And if you do anything wrong, it could be a criminal violation. It's and that's where it's something. Unfortunately, everyone has to get used to in this industry is it's treating us like criminals.  </p>
<p>00:18:57:15 - 00:19:13:15<br>Jason<br>Right. Like it's kind of we have to hit you over the head because you might not fill this out correctly because we don't really trust you in the first place. Plus, you're wasting all this energy instead of just saying, look, file your taxes, you know, maybe not your favorite thing and really won't be your favorite thing if we have to audit you later.  </p>
<p>00:19:13:15 - 00:19:32:27<br>Jason<br>But you know, you report to us and to me that's at a minimum. It's not great, right? No one like I said, no one likes the IRS. But you at least you report what you your income is. You know, that's always the joke, right? Did you cheat a little bit on your taxes? Whatever, Stuff like that. So if they want to learn all this information, they can pull it.  </p>
<p>00:19:32:27 - 00:19:56:05<br>Jason<br>Pull that, do it that same way. But this is this is not in that just let's reported in like no criminal violations. If you don't know, just let's start collecting the information because we want to learn more and we want to see, you know, what we might want to do with this information and better understand maybe there's benefits to it and so it just doesn't give give us the benefit of the doubt.  </p>
<p>00:19:56:05 - 00:20:19:25<br>Jason<br>So at a minimum, I think this the way that some of this is worded needs to be changed. The form itself might be a problem or a violation of the way the form is put together. B The reason I say the legal representation is it's not even even if you had everything right, right. And even if you had, you know, you're minors, you know, you're like and everything the way the form says, you know, if you get something wrong.  </p>
<p>00:20:19:27 - 00:20:36:20<br>Jason<br>That's why I think everyone needs a lawyer to fill it out if you are going to fill it out. Because what if you get something wrong? It's it's like a bit of a catch 22. And so so there's lots of I think there's room. Luckily, we live in a country where there's room to get lawyers to help us with this.  </p>
<p>00:20:36:20 - 00:21:09:22<br>Jason<br>We don't just have to comply. And I think there's there needs to be some congressional light shed on why was this emergency announced and that, you know, the biggest problem to me is this price increase that Bitcoin went up in price. And so and their assumption that therefore that, you know, there's going to be more activity. You know it notably doesn't mention that to have having is coming up soon I'd love them to try to evaluate what that might mean to it but here we are and maybe to get the Bitcoin ETF.  </p>
<p>00:21:09:22 - 00:21:35:25<br>Jason<br>So like Cathie Wood and others involved in this conversation because you have all of Wall Street now benefiting from a spot Bitcoin ETF and this policy looks like it's a bit of a reaction to that. You know like and wouldn't put me it wouldn't put I wouldn't put it past sort of the progressive attitude in this country of the minute something starts to be successful in a capitalistic light, you know, New York, New York, embracing these Bitcoin ETFs, prices burning.  </p>
<p>00:21:35:25 - 00:21:55:02<br>Jason<br>And of course, it came back a little bit. You know, this is when we start to see that the liberals get really crazy, right? I'm not trying to take sides between like, you know, conservatives and but but that's what they tend to do. They tend to just start go in and use these backdoor mechanisms to get what they want anyway, even if it's really already been decided.  </p>
<p>00:21:55:02 - 00:22:17:11<br>Jason<br>This is sort of policy. You know, there wasn't like a notice of rule saying, we're thinking about doing this and everyone respond or us respond and treat us like professionals and say this is the kind of information you should be looking at if you're really interested in learning about the energy use of this industry. This is just let's use the mechanism of the state to get what we want and because because they're terrified.  </p>
<p>00:22:17:12 - 00:22:24:09<br>Jason<br>They're terrified now that there's all these Bitcoin ETFs that that Bitcoin might win and succeed.  </p>
<p>00:22:24:11 - 00:22:50:02<br>Marty<br>Yeah, you can go back to the congressional point to the is that a way to prevent this from moving forward is if somebody in Congress was like, hey, why was the emergency authorization used? Like, shouldn't this go through Congress, go through a vote first, think, is there a roundabout way where Congress could stand up, say, you should have passed this through us first, like you know, the authority to do this?  </p>
<p>00:22:50:04 - 00:23:16:28<br>Jason<br>Yeah, it doesn't it doesn't actually have to be a vote of Congress. But every federal agency has oversight from a committee. And right now there's the House Energy and Commerce Committee that would have oversight. So that the chair of that committee, Cathy McMorris Rodgers from the state of Washington, could call a hearing or or request information as to why this was asked for.  </p>
<p>00:23:17:00 - 00:23:52:13<br>Jason<br>I'm not sure how much of a bitcoiners she is, but I do know she supports some of the broader, you know, concepts of like us being competitive against China. But that's really what you want is you want some chair of a committee who has oversight over this agency to send a letter immediately, send a letter asking questions like, you know, a letter that would say within two weeks, please explain what this is, what resources may be already deployed, you know, questions about it and maybe even say, maybe even in the letter request.  </p>
<p>00:23:52:13 - 00:24:07:00<br>Jason<br>Please wait on, you know, wait on this hold off like a month until you come before Congress and can really explain what you're going to be going out and doing with all of this information. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:24:07:02 - 00:24:16:05<br>Marty<br>So how do you think the next six months plays out, ideally in your mind?  </p>
<p>00:24:16:07 - 00:24:51:25<br>Jason<br>Ideally, I think that people might take enough exception to this. It might affect the outcome of the elect presidential election. And a lot of this might be reversed because right now this is a symptom of the Biden administration and the overwhelmingly progressive influence from Senator Warren. I think what I hope plays out and what I think you'll see, Marty, is you'll see people come to us in this community because people will realize that this can happen to this one industry.  </p>
<p>00:24:51:25 - 00:25:12:18<br>Jason<br>It can happen to any industry. And when you look at the amount of information that they're asking for, the degree to which they're doing it, it's a stifling of innovation. So I think that my hope would be in the next six months that they curtail this and that a lot of the large miners have already given information to Senator Elizabeth Warren.  </p>
<p>00:25:12:21 - 00:25:41:12<br>Jason<br>You know, so maybe leave it at these these are what the large commercial miners are. And I mean, hopefully get something like this shut down to the degree that there's enough pressure right. From Congress to say this is an overreach on administrative level. And I think you're going to have a huge lack of noncompliance. And I don't say that to say people are going to listen to your show and say, know, I'm not going to sign it.  </p>
<p>00:25:41:20 - 00:26:04:20<br>Jason<br>I think some people just won't. They they'll look at it. They won't be sure how to answer it. Some people may not even be aware they fall into this classification. I mean, there's been no notice, no press, no explanation how to do it. This is not like a friendly visit from, you know, your your postal service person. This is like, you know, coming from a place of investigation.  </p>
<p>00:26:04:20 - 00:26:15:16<br>Jason<br>So I really have a hard time seeing how they're going to get the results they want if, in fact, they do pull all this stuff between now and June.  </p>
<p>00:26:15:18 - 00:26:51:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah, and it's funny, the justification is you need to do this to make sure that our grids are secure and our energy systems are secure and everything this administration has done is a complete projection onto the Bitcoin industry specifically. But I wrote it in the newsletter. So if you want to stabilize the grids, make sure that you're building more reliable baseload and spin up the leases on federal lands again, maybe finish the Keystone XL pipeline, maybe take all the red tape off of nuclear power generation.  </p>
<p>00:26:51:27 - 00:27:39:02<br>Marty<br>There's many other lower hanging fruits that the government could take advantage of instead of attacking a specific industry. And that's that's where I think the signal is, is they have to know this to some extent. And do they really care about Bitcoin's energy use or are they using this, as you mentioned earlier, as an attack vector to hinder Bitcoin's proliferation throughout the economy and its adoption by individuals that could something like this, the survey go out, the data come back, and the government either manipulate the data or present it in a disingenuous way to fearmonger about all the energy that Bitcoin is sucking up.  </p>
<p>00:27:39:04 - 00:28:11:13<br>Jason<br>Yeah. Or come up with policies for the electricity providers, right? Who like maybe limit the amount of electricity they would be willing to give to this industry. There's there's this is this is where you would say like this the dam has broke. Right. And we're now is this now the era of like Bitcoin mining regulation and what that looks like in the US where there's actual federal regulations around the way you can mine Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:28:11:15 - 00:28:30:00<br>Marty<br>I hope it doesn't get to that point. That's one thing I wonder too, like talking about allies not only within the industry but across industries. I mean, I've seen it up close and personal. I'm very involved with multiple mining operations throughout the country, in the utilities companies that we work with love us because we're able to provide them more revenue.  </p>
<p>00:28:30:00 - 00:28:57:10<br>Marty<br>They can buy power in bulk passes, lower prices on to residents. That's an but still it's still early in that relationship between the energy sector and the Bitcoin mining sector. But this is something I've been saying at conferences and events over the last few months is like, we really need to get allies in the energy sector and help leverage their lobby to come help us put our case forward.  </p>
<p>00:28:57:10 - 00:29:24:09<br>Marty<br>Like, Hey, this is actually really good for our energy systems and our companies, our bottom lines and our ability to reinvest in infrastructure. That's that's one thing I'm hopeful will materialize. But now with this this registry for going out there, it seems like the time is and I need to convince those in the energy sector to think we're valuable economic partners to come come help us fight this.  </p>
<p>00:29:24:09 - 00:29:32:22<br>Marty<br>And as you mentioned, like West Virginia versus the EPA, they've certainly gone through this before. And is that the Chevron deference case as well, or is that separately?  </p>
<p>00:29:32:24 - 00:29:34:11<br>Jason<br>That's that's the one.  </p>
<p>00:29:34:14 - 00:29:35:06<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:29:35:08 - 00:30:02:00<br>Jason<br>So also, you know, if you remember like that, there's things ebb and flow in DC. We're in an election year. There's this one great documentary. I've got to try to find it, but it shows really like the cycles of the way Democrat presidents care about, like ESG, and they show them like putting solar panels on top of the White House and the like.  </p>
<p>00:30:02:00 - 00:30:20:12<br>Jason<br>As soon as Trump moves in or Bush moves in, they send construction workers on top of the White House and they take hammers. They knock the solar panels down, throw them off the roofs, you know, put them away for four years until the Democrat comes back. So what I guess I'm saying is, I mean, this is it seems a lot right now to us, right, Because this just happened.  </p>
<p>00:30:20:12 - 00:30:58:09<br>Jason<br>It's like, what does it mean? There's a lot of unknown. It's kind of scary. But you know, within a year, if there's a new administration, like all of us could go away really, really fast. And I think that's to me, like the hope at this point, because this there's just this is this is like epic level of of FUD about Bitcoin energy use and it's likely that this was scrambled in an emergency way because they know that if it's under a new administration, whether it's Trump, Haley or whoever, they're not going to put somebody in charge of an agency and do anything like this to Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:30:58:12 - 00:31:26:14<br>Jason<br>And I hate that Bitcoin has to become partizan that way. But I think for right now that's at least what it will take all of this kind of reporting stuff to go away. It's it's President Biden's and a little unusual that he's really really focused on ESG. And I and I've talked about this on other podcasts before, too, of you know, we hit this real roadblock with this administration because they decided to look at digital assets for the first time.  </p>
<p>00:31:26:20 - 00:31:47:19<br>Jason<br>You know, we had the huge market growth. Everything bubbled up and we just so happened to come across like a president that isn't just your average Democratic, you know, president who kind of cares about the environment, but has made it his number one priority. And so when you had those that really weren't fans of Bitcoin, you know, say, look, this is well, we know it's not.  </p>
<p>00:31:47:19 - 00:32:14:06<br>Jason<br>But look, use of energy, it's completely contrary to your objectives. We're not going to get, you know, to your goals in 2050 Bitcoin. It's going to destroy the planet, which, you know, was born. It said as much in some hearings. We have to stop Bitcoin. It's destroying the planet. It was his number one priority as a president. And so I think that that is why you're seeing this today is the last couple of days, this emergency thing go through because it is a priority of President Biden.  </p>
<p>00:32:14:09 - 00:32:37:00<br>Jason<br>This is his number one priority. And and so that we've they've hit upon the idea of what proof of work is. They feel like it used a lot of energy. And to them, it's like backwards. It's like we're going back to the coal era to the and it doesn't think through all the things that, you know, you've so eloquently talked about with maybe we need to go back to nuclear or anything like that.  </p>
<p>00:32:37:03 - 00:33:13:17<br>Jason<br>It's just like up here, we go back, we're just taking steps backward when it's an emerging innovation, Right? It's it's a new kind of money. It has so many possible uses, not just on the mining side, but so many uses in society. And it's just so we just kind of hit this really bad. It's bad timing because we just had a president who has been unusually worried about the environment and has been pandering for the most part to a lot of the environmental groups on a lot of these issues, not just Bitcoin, a lot of the, you know, energy industries have been facing this now for the last few years with the ESG narrative.  </p>
<p>00:33:13:19 - 00:33:50:22<br>Marty<br>Yeah, which is hilarious considering we just have to look over the Atlantic to Europe and I think they went first with this aggressive net zero energy policy and it's been extremely detrimental to their quality of life and the stability of their energy systems. And they rely a lot reliability of their energy systems and again, it is nonsensical in an election year considering that most of his first term has been plagued by high inflation and particularly in the energy sector, which has come down over the last year.  </p>
<p>00:33:50:22 - 00:34:13:07<br>Marty<br>But there's what's going on in the Middle East. The price of oil could certainly go much higher rather quickly if things escalate there. And it's just weird that they're doubling down on this ESG policy when it's an abject failure. Every everywhere you look that it's been implemented at full scale.  </p>
<p>00:34:13:09 - 00:34:26:20<br>Jason<br>Absolutely. And there's been a lot of folks who are now talking about reversing the ESG rate, like people are saying, we're going to get rid of this, you know, as soon as this is definitely going to be something that's going to affect, you know, the election.  </p>
<p>00:34:26:22 - 00:35:10:02<br>Marty<br>Yeah, And that's that's the other weird thing, too, is like obviously, I've been a notorious anti-gay advocate. But I mean, if you look at it, just like off grid miners reducing methane emissions, if you care about ESG, Bitcoin is a perfect vehicle to sort of bring about a more efficient energy system, whether it's offered or all great on grid solves the and yes, the social side of things where it's okay if these miners can come in and create grid stability and create stronger revenue streams for individual utility providers or power plants, I think that allows them to have a stronger balance sheet which will allow them to get more creative.  </p>
<p>00:35:10:02 - 00:35:18:21<br>Marty<br>The pricing, which typically benefits residential consumers with with lower prices.  </p>
<p>00:35:18:24 - 00:35:47:21<br>Jason<br>Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. You know, I know that you don't want it necessarily to come to this, but my my vision sort of three or four years out would be we're still going to be able to mine Bitcoin. But the larger commercial enterprises, a Bitcoin think of somebody who shows up from Washington DC in a suit and tie and, you know, puts on a hard hat and you know, is the, you know, Bitcoin mining inspector right?  </p>
<p>00:35:47:23 - 00:36:07:06<br>Jason<br>And you know, it's going to poke around, you know, look at what you're giving back to the grid, you know, questioning your practices. I don't think we'll get to like it won't be Venezuela. They won't co-opt it. I don't think they'll they'll never shut down something because remember that the same government loves and counts on our tax money.  </p>
<p>00:36:07:06 - 00:36:39:21<br>Jason<br>Right. So they'll how can we tax Bitcoin? How can we tax these these businesses to bring revenue back to the government? But I think the end game is that at least for the larger Bitcoin miners, this is the sustainable path, no pun intended is I think four or five years from now you might see sort of these inspectors from the the DOE to come out and just poke around like they do any other any other aspect of energy production.  </p>
<p>00:36:39:23 - 00:37:01:06<br>Jason<br>And I'm not saying that's a good outcome, but I like because I think we'd still be able to to to do Bitcoin mining. I just think we we might be seeing the era of, of, of regulation of Bitcoin mining in some degree or another in this country because, you know, as you said, it's like A.C. but we've just we've moved in this country so far away of just basic freedoms.  </p>
<p>00:37:01:06 - 00:37:06:21<br>Jason<br>It's hard to imagine that an industry could ever just be left alone entirely.  </p>
<p>00:37:06:24 - 00:37:34:21<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I've hope we can get back to it. Hopefully Bitcoin succeeds and they don't have all the money they need to to burden us with the pencil pushers and the scrutiny. It's just insane because when you think the innovation, the Bitcoin mining has brought the energy system, it's like palpable, it's tangible, it's very clear in the data. The data is there, it's out.  </p>
<p>00:37:34:21 - 00:37:59:19<br>Marty<br>That's the most frustrating thing about this is they're asking for data that's already public that they could easily find in public filings by companies like Riot, Marathon, Iris, whatever it may be, stronghold like strongholds doing alone to solve the waste coal problem that exist in Pennsylvania. That should be something that people are cheering on. There's this weird vendetta.  </p>
<p>00:37:59:21 - 00:38:19:14<br>Marty<br>I think it's because they can't control Bitcoin, the asset or the network. At the end of the day, mining is just the attack vector they've chosen because it's very visible and physical. So it's literally a physical attack vector that can be pinpointed and attacked.  </p>
<p>00:38:19:16 - 00:38:45:18<br>Jason<br>It's funny that you say that too, like for riot and Marathon and these are others brings bears to mind. Well, this type of activity allows the larger Bitcoin miners to get bigger because you might have a lot of people who are smaller commercial miners who maybe can't afford or don't have to pay for a lawyer to fill out this form or might just be kind of, you know, straight up intimidated by the form to say this is not worth our business.  </p>
<p>00:38:45:18 - 00:39:22:25<br>Jason<br>If if this is, you know, the US government's asking for all this information, it's turn off the mines and turn off the miners. So it might create a little bit more consolidation, which isn't a good thing, right? We need the decentralization. We need the smaller miners as well as the larger miners. But that's that's part of my fear with this is not just about the the substance of the form, but the manner in which it's being delivered and the business decisions that might come, you know, come up for people saying, well, you know, I'll fill out the form this one time, but I'm getting out of this business because it's, you know, clearly this is  </p>
<p>00:39:22:25 - 00:39:42:00<br>Jason<br>something that, you know, I don't want to like. Now they're asking who my electrician tricity providers are. So there's this element of I guess it's kind of intimidation, right, that we're just extra burden, extra regulatory burden. You know, why would I want to be involved in this? So it's going to take the true believers to kind of push back.  </p>
<p>00:39:42:00 - 00:40:13:03<br>Jason<br>And, you know, one thing that's been done in the past was about it was more about like the Bitcoin core developers in turn. Remember, it was like in 2016, but there were these like 50 lawyers in DC that got together and started offering like pro-bono help. So that I mean, that could be something like something I'll think about, like how can we coordinate to help get, you know, pro-bono help for people who are going to be getting these forms so they don't just walk away from the business and also so they can feel protected, you know, if they choose to answer the form.  </p>
<p>00:40:13:06 - 00:40:47:27<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I guess that dovetails into a broader topic, which is the state know of Bitcoin, the Bitcoin industry's influence over policy, which you touched on in the beginning. But what would you like to see in terms of the industry really getting smart about interacting with the federal government despite whether or not we would like to do it seems that you do have to play ball to a certain degree just to protect your interests and the profitability of your business and the ability to to exist at all in the first place.  </p>
<p>00:40:48:00 - 00:40:53:24<br>Marty<br>Like, have we made progress in recent years? Is it happening fast enough?  </p>
<p>00:40:53:26 - 00:41:17:11<br>Jason<br>Yeah, I think we've made progress. Like, I mean, I'll toot the Bitcoin Policy Institute's horn, you know, I'm an adviser to them, but they responded. They engaged with the White House when they were looking at it and some of their report did talk about the benefits of Bitcoin mining. So it's it's not this is just one administrator and and his sort of, dare I say, narrow view of what Bitcoin is and what the way it should be handled.  </p>
<p>00:41:17:13 - 00:41:41:11<br>Jason<br>But there has been open reception to the possibilities of the benefits for Bitcoin mining. And so I think we need to curate that. My belief for a long time has been we need to create something akin to whether it's the NRA. People don't like that because they feel like it's just this far right or something. Of the AARP, I mentioned the idea of the NRA.  </p>
<p>00:41:41:11 - 00:42:12:07<br>Jason<br>I'm like the Progressive Bitcoiners podcast and they didn't like that. How are we going to sell that to progressive Democrats? But you call it the AARP. But if you have a group of people, even if they're in a minority and they believe in something strong enough, you need that that grassroots support, which the playing ball part is finding some smart people right in Washington, DC, who are also believers and who know who to speak to in power, who know how.  </p>
<p>00:42:12:09 - 00:42:50:20<br>Jason<br>Washington, DC works, you know, understanding, you know, who to go talk to, the right people. And if you think about anytime there's an action that the NRA doesn't like, I mean, it's instantly stopped. You know, it's very hard to get any kind of bill right regarding, you know, guns and Second Amendment issues. So the idea of the Fourth Amendment and finding that that narrative to go with the fact that there's all these people out there that believe Bitcoin, that care about it, that maybe you're willing to, you know, like you do with NRA, you know, chip in ten or 15 bucks, you get a magazine.  </p>
<p>00:42:50:20 - 00:43:31:09<br>Jason<br>But, you know, you have your support, build that up. I think that doesn't exist yet for us. It's it's starting to like BPI is a good start. But remember, it's a51c3 nonprofit. So it doesn't actually, you know, go and try to change policy or change legislation directly with lobbying. So I think as Bitcoin gets bigger and there's like the Bitcoin ETF are growing and other things that, you know, getting a getting a good crew of Bitcoin lobbyists that can organize a grassroots campaign that would already be instead of you and me talking like this, we already be in front of the right officials trying to, you know, get this changed or get this modified or  </p>
<p>00:43:31:11 - 00:43:52:06<br>Jason<br>to be quite honest, this is already kind of done right. The forms already printed and everything. The idea in DC is you want to try to get something before it's complete. So like, you know, you maybe have the right people in play who like this is sort of the rumblings of what's going to happen and they can run to the White House to sort of say, no, this you should you better not declare an emergency on like Bitcoin mining that's, you know, absurd.  </p>
<p>00:43:52:06 - 00:44:12:15<br>Jason<br>So I do think that's the kind of juice that that we need to protect Bitcoin. It it it goes very antithetical to the way a lot of people, including myself, believe. Like I've always said, I'll teach anybody how you go talk to your congressman or talk to your, you know, local representative. I don't want to be like an intermediary or a middleman.  </p>
<p>00:44:12:17 - 00:44:40:13<br>Jason<br>I want it to be peer to peer, you know, But it's one degree or another to have the right messengers and build that grassroots support is going to be necessary to protect kind of the core tenants of what Bitcoin is about. And it's so great the, you know, the rights of property, the right to code. There's so many aspects of this that makes it so much in the American spirit, the American way that, you know, that's what I hope we can find.  </p>
<p>00:44:40:13 - 00:45:01:08<br>Jason<br>I think that would be a really exciting kind of grassroots movement to get together with. And, you know, I'll say this like some people in Bitcoin I've spoken to before on this and they know I'm a lobbyist and everything. And, you know, they kind of the question always comes up, Marty, and the debate into, well, why do we need you?  </p>
<p>00:45:01:08 - 00:45:17:01<br>Jason<br>You know, we don't want to lobby. We're just going to do our own thing and just sort of ignore like what DC does. And the problem with that is that there's people in DC to care about what you're doing. And this is like case in point, you know, if you just sort of ignore them, then they come up with all these things and they make up their own stories.  </p>
<p>00:45:17:01 - 00:45:37:14<br>Jason<br>So you just at some point or another, if enough people decide you have your own storytellers there to kind of protect the turf and as Bitcoin gets bigger, I think we're going to need that at some point to make it so we don't have these overbearing type actions. We're getting there. We're seeing some reactions. You know, BP was on the phone all day yesterday.  </p>
<p>00:45:37:14 - 00:45:54:20<br>Jason<br>You know, David Zell and that group trying to figure out what to do or not quite there yet, where we have sort of the juice of an NRA or something to kind of just step in and push back. And I think most people in Bitcoin will come around and realizing this is part of the game. We need to just play that for now so.  </p>
<p>00:45:54:22 - 00:46:26:21<br>Marty<br>We'll know we've made it. When the NBA is synonymous with the National Bitcoin Association and the National Basketball Association. And so that's the goal for is to get there. One last topic to touch on, which I think is important to bring up is states standing up for companies in their borders. Obviously, there's a big federal or state standoff coming going on down here in Texas right now at the border.  </p>
<p>00:46:26:21 - 00:46:48:06<br>Marty<br>We saw that trend of states asserting their autonomy from the federal government during COVID lockdowns. That seems like something that is becoming more prominent in terms of national. The states standing up and say, now we're going to do our own thing. You see states standing up for their companies in their borders, regards the federal government, or would that be important?  </p>
<p>00:46:48:06 - 00:46:50:24<br>Marty<br>At the end of the day?  </p>
<p>00:46:50:27 - 00:47:12:23<br>Jason<br>You know, I think that would be pretty powerful. I mean, when like DeSantis tried to do the whole anti cbdc thing or say, in Florida, we're not going to have a cbdc. I mean, the government prints money at the federal level and it's not really I don't know that the law would be effective, but like talking about Texas and the border and that too, to that point, this is about a form.  </p>
<p>00:47:12:23 - 00:47:39:07<br>Jason<br>And if this is affecting, you know, your state and local businesses, I mean, this is just a classic case of federal overreach. You'll likely have a lot of state opposition to it. And, you know, the one thought I had when you were sort of sharing that, it's like, you know, with Bitcoin, it's about the consensus. Right. And a lot of times in government when these programs start, it's a lot about like consensus and like, do you get the results?  </p>
<p>00:47:39:07 - 00:47:57:25<br>Jason<br>So like, you know, you send in, you know, people with the badge, you know, the enforcers and saying here and fill out these forms. But like if enough people don't fill out the forms or don't comply, you know, that's they don't have enough of a consensus. They don't have enough of the information that way. It's possible they just walk away.  </p>
<p>00:47:57:25 - 00:48:14:06<br>Jason<br>You know, they've already come up with their own conclusions. They already put out yesterday on their website how much Bitcoin energy is using and looks like they have all this data in there, you know, talking about want to do this, you know, very careful data collection practices. The problems with these jokers is it's not like a geological survey.  </p>
<p>00:48:14:06 - 00:48:31:29<br>Jason<br>You know, there's actual people and businesses that you're exploring and kicking the tires around. And it's a it's a violation of privacy. So absolutely. I mean, if if we're willing to if you sort of start seeing what's happening, the dynamics in Texas right now. Right. But the border is about filling out a form is that state reps just say we're not filling it out.  </p>
<p>00:48:32:03 - 00:48:39:10<br>Jason<br>You know, our companies won't fill it out for you and create a federal versus state. Yeah. Standoff.  </p>
<p>00:48:39:12 - 00:49:04:23<br>Marty<br>Wow. This that's what I love to hear. Getting excited is talk. The rent is too damn high, the government is too damn big. Get out of our life. It's. It's funny. I mean, again, it's just, uh. Yeah, this stuff should be expected that Conor has been talking about these hypothetical adversarial situations for a decade and a half now.  </p>
<p>00:49:04:26 - 00:49:50:13<br>Marty<br>I mean, and it should be expected. It just is disconcerting when you finally have it's like, Oh, God, here we go again. We got a spend bunch of money and get a bunch of lawyers, write a bunch of newsletters, articles, get some data and fight back, spend a bunch of money to do this. And that's the frustrating thing, I think, for a lot of people in this industry, because I think, as you would agree, that the innovation that's happening, whether it's within the mining industry, at the payments layer, at the just sound digital money layer, it's extremely exciting and extremely encouraging for all of humanity to think that a bunch of 70 to 90 year  </p>
<p>00:49:50:13 - 00:50:14:23<br>Marty<br>old individuals in DC who really don't understand or maybe they do understand, but just don't like Bitcoin from a philosophical and ideological perspective are going to try to throw the baby out of the window because they don't like it and it's just get out of the way. And so it's very frustrating.  </p>
<p>00:50:14:25 - 00:50:40:24<br>Jason<br>I mean, it's hard to believe we're about to have a potential presidential contest where people in like eight decades of life each like where's the hope? Where's the JFK or whoever you want to call it, right of out of our time. And and I think one thing that probably would be helpful would be to show Washington, DC the faces of like what Bitcoin mining is about, make sure that they're real people, real jobs, real professions.  </p>
<p>00:50:40:24 - 00:50:58:12<br>Jason<br>I think that's what we need to get to because right now they're they're kind of able to dehumanize it. You know, it's like Bitcoin itself. It doesn't really exist. We don't know what it does, but it waste all this energy, you know, showing stories of people who've made, you know, careers for themselves, you know, hire people, you know, get involved in the industry.  </p>
<p>00:50:58:15 - 00:51:30:10<br>Jason<br>And they're being responsible about the energy use. Right. Working with grids. You know, there's a there's a powerful story to tell, you know, for the Bitcoin mining community. And I think, you know, if we can figure out a way to tell it correctly, you know, then then that's something that can can push back on this One thing, you know, just like with the, you know, the 51% attack is, you know, realize some of these folks like the environmental groups, this kind of this angle of attack, it's not going to go away.  </p>
<p>00:51:30:12 - 00:51:48:27<br>Jason<br>It's always going to attack it. Just the way will always be attackers, the Bitcoin network. We just have to make sure the incentives are aligned in such a way where we're able to keep, yeah, the sound money and everything else, you know, dream alive here in the U.S. And I think that it's they picked the wrong country to try to pull this kind of stuff in.  </p>
<p>00:51:48:29 - 00:51:52:07<br>Marty<br>Yeah, we're going to win, Jason. We're going to win.  </p>
<p>00:51:52:09 - 00:51:52:24<br>Jason<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:51:52:26 - 00:52:11:24<br>Marty<br>It's not going to be easy, but nothing worth doing was ever easy. So, look, luckily we have individuals like yourself who understand these problems very intricately can help advise us as we're fighting this. And thank you for hopping on the part. I mean, you did me yesterday. I was like, Can you record tomorrow? I think it's a pretty important sell.  </p>
<p>00:52:11:27 - 00:52:15:09<br>Marty<br>Thank you for coming around quickly to have this conversation.  </p>
<p>00:52:15:11 - 00:52:17:21<br>Jason<br>Absolutely. As you're talking to Imani.  </p>
<p>00:52:17:23 - 00:52:33:28<br>Marty<br>Yeah. I think we'll post this right away at Logan just to get it out there, because the time it's time we're pressed for time. The clock is ticking. We need to really begin coordinating and in fighting back against this, I think we'll win, though.  </p>
<p>00:52:34:00 - 00:52:35:02<br>Jason<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:52:35:04 - 00:52:44:03<br>Marty<br>So where can anybody listen to this? Find out more about you, what you're doing, and how you can help.  </p>
<p>00:52:44:05 - 00:53:10:23<br>Jason<br>Yeah. Demi at my date, my Twitter handles at regulatory. Jason And also reach out to the Bitcoin policy Institute that's at BTC policy and you know we can direct you to sort of your resources as I can definitely share you know start to think about a list of lawyers that I want to put together to maybe get people support any questions at all.  </p>
<p>00:53:10:28 - 00:53:30:24<br>Jason<br>You know, you want to figure out how to talk to politicians. Maybe I'll work on like sort of like a letter or something you can start to send in. But at the end of the day, like it's it's important to just not just fill out this fact. There's lots of reasons, you know, talk to your business advisors, consultants, lawyers before you just fill out this form because it's already February.  </p>
<p>00:53:30:24 - 00:53:38:29<br>Jason<br>Right. And they said they're going to start the first week of February. That's Monday, right? That's in three days. So yeah, yeah. Just DM me on Twitter. I'll get back to you.  </p>
<p>00:53:39:01 - 00:53:54:09<br>Marty<br>Awesome. We'll link to Jason's Twitter, the Bitcoin Policy Institute's Twitter in the notes, so go check those out. And Jason, thank you again. Extremely important work. I'm sure we'll be talking about this again at some point in the next six months.  </p>
<p>00:53:54:12 - 00:53:57:12<br>Jason<br>Sounds great, honor. Be on your show, Marty Quick then.  </p>
<p>00:53:57:15 - 00:54:02:28<br>Marty<br>Tell everybody at the Bitcoin Jawn I said, What's up on Monday? Got it. All right. Peace, love freaks. Okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[Scrib]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/federal-government-attack-on-bitcoin-mining-jason-brett/">Read original post</a></p>
<h2>Key Takeaways</h2>
<p>In this emergency podcast episode of TFTC, Marty Bent and Jason Brett discuss a sudden and concerning move by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) under the Department of Energy, which has issued a survey requesting detailed information from the bitcoin mining industry. The survey, which was pushed through quickly and without much notice, has raised alarm due to its extensive data demands, including the longitude and latitude coordinates of mining operations.</p>
<p>Jason Brett, serving as an advisor to the Bitcoin Policy Institute and a seasoned figure in the space, sheds light on the federal landscape surrounding bitcoin policy. He explains the potential legal issues associated with the survey, such as Fourth Amendment violations, and the broader implications for industry regulation.</p>
<p>The conversation touches upon the history of federal interest in bitcoin, starting from President Biden’s executive order on digital assets, which raised environmental concerns about proof of work systems, to Senator Elizabeth Warren’s push for more scrutiny of bitcoin mining’s energy consumption. Brett also discusses the Supreme Court case of West Virginia vs. EPA, which could challenge the EIA's survey as it targets a specific industry based on ESG considerations.</p>
<p>Marty and Jason consider the necessity of solidarity within the bitcoin mining industry to respond to this "attack vector" and suggest that legal representation is essential for those dealing with the survey. They also explore the potential for states to protect their interests against federal overreach and the importance of building grassroots support and lobbying efforts to safeguard bitcoin’s future in the U.S.</p>
<h2>Links</h2>
<p>Follow Jason on <a href="https://twitter.com/RegulatoryJason?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>Check out the <a href="https://www.btcpolicy.org/?ref=tftc.io">Bitcoin Policy Institute</a></p>
<h2>Sponsors</h2>
<h2>Sponsors</h2>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h2>Best Quotes</h2>
<ol>
<li>"We don't just have to comply. And I think there needs to be some congressional light shed on why was this emergency announced." – Jason Brett_Context: Discussing the need for Congressional intervention to question the EIA's emergency authorization._</li>
<li>"This is about a form. And if this is your state and local... this is just a classic case of federal overreach." – Jason Brett_Context: Considering the potential for state governments to challenge the federal government’s intrusive demands on bitcoin miners._</li>
<li>"It's not like a friendly visit from your postal service person. This is like coming from a place of investigation." – Jason Brett_Context: Describing the intimidating nature of the EIA's survey and its implications for bitcoin miners._</li>
<li>"We're not going to get to your goals in 2050. It's going to destroy the planet, which Elizabeth Warren has said as much in some hearings. We have to stop bitcoin. It's destroying the planet." – Jason Brett_Context: Highlighting the extreme views of some policymakers on bitcoin's environmental impact._</li>
<li>"It's literally a physical attack vector that can be pinpointed and attacked." – Marty Bent_Context: Marty Bent explaining why mining has become the focus of regulatory scrutiny._</li>
<li>"As bitcoin gets bigger, I think we're going to need that at some point to make it so we don't have these overbearing type actions." – Jason Brett_Context: Discussing the need for a strong, organized bitcoin community to influence policy._</li>
<li>"The rent is too damn high. The government is too damn big too. Get out of our life." – Marty Bent <em>Context: Expressing frustration at government overreach and the desire for autonomy.</em></li>
</ol>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The podcast episode serves as an urgent call to action for the bitcoin mining community and highlights a critical moment where both legal and grassroots efforts are necessary to counteract potential regulatory overreach. The EIA's emergency survey, which demands extensive and intrusive data from miners, represents a significant threat to the industry's privacy rights and operational freedom. Marty Bent and Jason Brett discuss the need for industry solidarity, legal defense, and political lobbying to ensure that this does not set a precedent for future regulation.</p>
<p>The episode also emphasizes the potential role of state governments in defending their economic interests against federal intrusion, as well as the importance of conveying the human and innovative aspects of bitcoin mining to policymakers. Ultimately, the overarching message is one of resilience and the belief that, despite the challenges, the bitcoin community has the power and resources to overcome these adversarial actions and continue to thrive in the United States.</p>
<h2>Timestamps</h2>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>6:17 - Overview on “emergency” survey<br>15:03 - Clearly an overt state attack<br>21:45 - Fighting back<br>30:21 - Upcoming months<br>32:30 - Energy industry and policy<br>39:29 - Failure of ESG<br>46:31 - Making political progress<br>52:20 - Federal vs State<br>58:12 - Wrapping up</p>
<h2>Transcript</h2>
<p>00:00:02:13 - 00:00:05:23<br>Marty<br>And we are live. Jason, Brett, welcome to the show.  </p>
<p>00:00:05:25 - 00:00:08:03<br>Jason<br>Marty, how you doing? Good to be here.  </p>
<p>00:00:08:05 - 00:00:37:04<br>Marty<br>Doing well. This is a bit of an emergency podcast we've thrown together in response to the IEA's survey requests for the Bitcoin mining industry. It seems to be driven by the Department of Energy, rushed through rather quickly over the last couple of weeks. Who? Someone is calling me here. Ignore that. Yeah. And it came out of nowhere, it seems.  </p>
<p>00:00:37:06 - 00:00:57:10<br>Marty<br>And it is forcing the industry, the Bitcoin mining industry, to formulate a response rather quickly. I think before we make any assumptions and just maybe describe what you've been working on on the policy front, your experience and how you're viewing this, the survey, this registry, if you will.  </p>
<p>00:00:57:12 - 00:01:27:10<br>Jason<br>Yeah, So I'm an advisor to the Bitcoin Policy Institute and I've been in the space for about seven years now. I think in terms of the policy in considering Bitcoin mining, there really has not yet been anything on the federal level regarding agencies doing anything. And the start of the federal policy on Bitcoin in general kicked off with an executive order two years ago.  </p>
<p>00:01:27:12 - 00:02:07:28<br>Jason<br>Executive order from Biden on digital assets. Part of that was concerns about sustainability. ESG It's important for people to remember President Biden is a it's his top priority right now about concerns about the environment. So part of this looked into the energy use of proof of work systems and they talked in that if you read through the executive order, one of the findings was that maybe the, you know, these agencies, federal agencies, could guide state and local partners on potential alternatives to proof of work, as well as looking at the energy consumption and better understanding it.  </p>
<p>00:02:08:01 - 00:02:27:17<br>Jason<br>So what you have is you have an executive order two years ago that's saying we need to learn more about Bitcoin mining. We need to understand more. And at that time the Bitcoin Policy Institute responded. We had talked to people in the White House about the program and there was good, good feedback. Trey Cross had been the lead really on that.  </p>
<p>00:02:27:17 - 00:03:02:03<br>Jason<br>As you know, Troy is really the master of this area. But what you had was and forgive the DC speak for your listeners, but kind of you had what's called a soliloquy, which is where Elizabeth Warren writes a letter saying, I think these agencies should start to look into what Bitcoin miners are doing at the federal level. And, you know, the mining contingent, if you remember Michael Saylor and I think a few other major players went and talked to the, you know, Department of Energy saying, look, this is a little overblown.  </p>
<p>00:03:02:03 - 00:03:22:15<br>Jason<br>We don't know if this is the right angle. But as we know now, this EIA has now decided on this emergency basis. And I say emergency lightly because you've explored and I've explored, too, these are very well thought out survey questions like, I mean, for an emergency, it's like they put together these these well-thought out questions and thoughts.  </p>
<p>00:03:22:17 - 00:03:50:08<br>Jason<br>So I think it would have taken at least a few weeks to put together. But now what they call an emergency to look into the amount of energy that Bitcoin mining is used. And they say things like the Bitcoin mining price. So what? And we now know because we saw the EIA put out on its website yesterday, not only information about why they were doing it, which is when I call it a soliloquy, that's the response to saying We hear you, Senator Warren.  </p>
<p>00:03:50:08 - 00:04:16:29<br>Jason<br>We're doing what you're asking. We're trying to find out all this information about how much energy Bitcoin miners are using. But the other thing that besides that response is they already started giving data of their own analysis of how much energy Bitcoin mining is using. So in a matter of 24 hours, Marty, we've gone from we need to explore in an emergency basis how much energy Bitcoin mining is using to within 24 hours.  </p>
<p>00:04:16:29 - 00:04:38:11<br>Jason<br>The agency putting up the website, all these numbers and data they've explored saying bitcoin energy is really bad. So at a minimum I think there's well, there's lots of concerns, but the baseline concern is that there's a bit of confirmation bias because they're assuming that it's bad for the environment. So this survey to them might just result in saying, yes, we agree it's bad for the environment.  </p>
<p>00:04:38:13 - 00:05:03:20<br>Jason<br>The real concern and it's a legal matter has to do something called West Virginia versus EPA. And I say that because that's a really important Supreme Court decision. We've heard president candidate when he was running Vivek Ramaswamy say is probably one of most important court decisions in our time as it relates to Bitcoin, because it specifically prohibits the agency from doing exactly what it's doing.  </p>
<p>00:05:03:20 - 00:05:33:29<br>Jason<br>So what it means is it can't focus on a particular industry based on like ESG. So it can't just go after an industry saying, we think there's too many problems with the environment of what your industry is doing. And the Supreme Court, highest court in the land in West Virginia versus EPA, you know, West Virginia, one. And basically what that means is the letters that Senator Warren sent encouraging this agency to do this is probably in violation of that finding by the Supreme Court.  </p>
<p>00:05:34:01 - 00:06:03:21<br>Jason<br>And so people are now being told, as you pointed out, like if you're a Bitcoin miner and you see these letters, it's like under criminal law, if you don't report or whatever. But it's very possible this whole exercise is what the EIA is doing, could could be challenged in court and we could potentially get a stay on what they're doing or it'd be overturned because it was made very clear, again and by the Supreme Court, you know, you can't do this to an industry just on the energy side alone.  </p>
<p>00:06:03:24 - 00:06:17:28<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And we were talking before we hit record, this is somewhat of an unprecedented attack on a particular industry via emergency authorization authorization that was pushed through is that correct in your mind? Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:06:18:00 - 00:06:22:12<br>Jason<br>Yeah. I've never seen this at this level happen.  </p>
<p>00:06:22:15 - 00:06:55:29<br>Marty<br>That and I was talking to Reed Browning from Cathedra. He's a CTO at Cathedral, a mining company, and he was actually ex Department of Energy and he's pretty convinced that this was definitely pushed from above the EIA, from above the Department of Energy, because when you look at when the survey was proposed on January 24th and when it was approved, which is January 26, like something happening that quickly within the U.S. federal government really never happens.  </p>
<p>00:06:56:02 - 00:07:05:06<br>Marty<br>And so it seems like they've been planning this behind the scenes, just getting their ducks in a row before actually pushing this forward.  </p>
<p>00:07:05:08 - 00:07:25:25<br>Jason<br>Yeah. I mean, they invoke the emergency basis for them to execute it in the way they're doing it. But again, you look at those surveys and those questions, it's pretty evident that there was some time, considerable time put together. You know, one thing I've been thinking about with this, too, is this would almost be never tolerated in any other industry.  </p>
<p>00:07:25:27 - 00:07:46:25<br>Jason<br>And sorry for any Detroit Lions fans, but it's kind of like being a Lions fan where you've never won the Super Bowl. We're all kind of, you know, you're a nice guy. I'm a nice guy, But but there's this sense of like, you know, if this was the NRA, this this would be shut down already, Right? If they said we're going to do a survey, figure out how many guns all Americans have, you know, the NRA would be at the White House.  </p>
<p>00:07:46:27 - 00:08:21:05<br>Jason<br>And I think there's a certain degree of like where we need to start thinking as a as a community, as bitcoiners. You know, we hold a lot more power than we realize. You know, people reach out if we figure out ways of influencing and doing advocacy, you know, we can get this to go well. The only reason that we're even talking about this and that it's likely next week, in my opinion, this is going to start this process of because they said February to June start going around and asking information is there really isn't enough powerful force to kind of stand in their way to stop them from doing it, You know, and that's that's  </p>
<p>00:08:21:05 - 00:08:40:23<br>Jason<br>the problem with this with new industry and there's this element of we've starting to think about how Bitcoin could change the world and how it might affect things in government. And, you know, a lot of people don't like that. And this is this is an attack vector that I have to say, unfortunately, like this is Elizabeth Warren has executed this one pretty well.  </p>
<p>00:08:40:23 - 00:08:47:24<br>Jason<br>And unfortunately, it's obvious from this that it's not going away. It's something we have to figure out an answer to.  </p>
<p>00:08:47:27 - 00:09:14:24<br>Marty<br>And so I want to talk about what we can do it as a response. But first, let's dive into the details of the survey. Is there any Fourth Amendment protection? Because it seems like this is a pretty egregious affront to privacy rights of individuals and corporations. It's literally asking mining companies to go to their electricity providers and have their electricity providers dox information to them about their other customers.  </p>
<p>00:09:14:26 - 00:09:23:12<br>Marty<br>They're no the overall percentage that the bitcoin miners are using with their overall capacity.  </p>
<p>00:09:23:14 - 00:09:48:18<br>Jason<br>Yeah, I, I chuckle because you know, we talk about Operation Choke point we've seen that about like the banks trying to cut off like I've been thinking this is like operation pull the plug like let's go to all the electricity providers so who's giving the energy to Bitcoin and then give the government the ability to like, you know, chase them away from from diverting all this energy to this unimportant project?  </p>
<p>00:09:48:20 - 00:10:15:11<br>Jason<br>The survey that the idea is that it definitely it talks about a commercial crypto asset miner and what that's a tricky one because you said it yourself, individuals or businesses. You know, I have a few Bitcoin miners in my downstairs, right? I mean, do I does that mean that if if I get this survey or it says all need to report, like at what point am I a commercial endeavor?  </p>
<p>00:10:15:15 - 00:10:47:02<br>Jason<br>Right. And there are EPA rules about pollution that certain industries have to comply with. But this this is likely a Fourth Amendment violation because it's it's probing for information. Right. And it's asking specific, like you say, asking for the electricity providers and the names, the electricity providers and giving just just downright like information about your business that may be a competitive factor that you don't necessarily want to part with.  </p>
<p>00:10:47:04 - 00:11:09:00<br>Jason<br>So it it crosses it. It's a it's a challenge for anybody. Like for me, I have to think about and say, well, does this apply to me? I mean, I have half a dozen miners downstairs, but like, am I a commercial miner? Do I just need to fill out this form in case? So there's a question of the who who does this apply to?  </p>
<p>00:11:09:02 - 00:11:32:04<br>Jason<br>Because it's certainly casting a wide net, but it absolutely is a Fourth Amendment violation. Because think about it, what if they what if you're talking about like mining like something or doing something with computers? And they said, we need to know how much energy your computer is using. And like, everybody has to tell you. So it seems hard to believe that it wouldn't violate that that constitutional protection that we have.  </p>
<p>00:11:32:06 - 00:11:39:04<br>Marty<br>I mean, they literally want the longitude, latitude coordinates of all your operations.  </p>
<p>00:11:39:07 - 00:11:58:23<br>Jason<br>And, you know, and that's what I'm trying to understand, because we saw that map, right, that showed 56 Bitcoin miners. So it feel like do they already know the coordinates anyway? And they just because because then you run the trouble of then you answer this form and what if you get it wrong and they then hold you in violation because you didn't answer truthfully.  </p>
<p>00:11:58:25 - 00:12:26:28<br>Jason<br>So we had a latitude and longitude is is pretty, pretty priceless. But but I mean talk about a surveillance state. It's it's we've we've reached this this is we've we've departed from the the the idea of you know, we think the U.S. is against bitcoin mining. You know we know some senators have a problem with it, too. Like this is when we actually see sort of the state at work.  </p>
<p>00:12:27:00 - 00:12:50:23<br>Jason<br>And I mean, this form, you know, you have to either what, mail it or or fax it back or something. You can't even really it's just clearly they have an operation for it. But I mean, this is I think there's some questions people need to ask that starts with is like, what does this mean? Like when people come and talk to you, you know, should you even talk to them?  </p>
<p>00:12:50:23 - 00:13:17:18<br>Jason<br>She say, I need a lawyer first, you know, like just don't I think you have to I think it's going to require everybody to get legal representation to answer this form properly to avoid any problems with the law. Later. And that's when you're papering an industry to death, which is unfortunate. But we've never But to be honest, I mean, really, Marty, like I'm I'm saying all this and at the same time, I'm I'm slightly at a loss for words because this is really new territory.  </p>
<p>00:13:17:18 - 00:13:30:21<br>Jason<br>I just I can't ever. Can you think in your lifetime of an industry being sort of this this collection process is just targeted And I just know I don't think anyone's ever heard of this before, so.  </p>
<p>00:13:30:24 - 00:13:50:19<br>Marty<br>Not in the United States. But we do have one example of another government doing this throughout Bitcoin's history, and that's Venezuela. They collected all this data and then took all the information and quickly confiscated everybody's miners to mine for themselves. Yeah, it's just something that everybody should be worried about.  </p>
<p>00:13:50:21 - 00:14:17:10<br>Jason<br>Yeah, And look, we already know the U.S. has confiscated a lot of Bitcoin, like in Mt. Gox. We don't know to the degree that they mined themselves. But I do think that what's critical here is that they're talking about in that memo that we saw today on the EIA website, concerns about, you know, this is what's happening in the United States because China shut off its Bitcoin mining.  </p>
<p>00:14:17:10 - 00:14:49:18<br>Jason<br>And so, you know, we know it's a growing issue in the U.S. And so there's clear policy reasons behind it. You know that everyone's come to the U.S. now, you know, to mine. And I think that the the real danger here is like once they set up the registry and they've collected this information, what like next steps they're going to take, and that's like you said, there's the confiscation.  </p>
<p>00:14:49:18 - 00:15:19:11<br>Jason<br>But in this case, is it extra taxes for using the energy? And it's so it's it's the problem. I think that is it's the once you have that registry set up and people just start complying with this just by complying with it, it makes it looks like we think there's a problem. Right. So that's that's why I think that setting up this registry, like what could the next step be?  </p>
<p>00:15:19:11 - 00:15:30:20<br>Jason<br>I don't think it's confiscating the miners. I think to them it's like shutting it off because they want to decarbonize, you know, the planet. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:15:30:22 - 00:16:04:02<br>Marty<br>And it's it's weird, too, because a lot of the information they're projecting to want to understand better is already disclosed by many of the public miners, particularly and even some private miners, particularly those participating in demand response programs. I mean, just two weeks ago, we had a -4% difficulty adjustment because miners were participating in demand response to send electricity back to the grid, making it more stable and creating a more stable pricing environment for residential consumers.  </p>
<p>00:16:04:02 - 00:16:24:04<br>Marty<br>And yeah, it is an overt attack feels that way. It certainly is that way. If it smells, walks like a duck, sounds like a duck, smells like a duck at the duck. And I guess that's a question. I mean, I wrote my newsletter. I've stayed up pretty late. I was a little tired, a little aggressive in my wording.  </p>
<p>00:16:24:04 - 00:16:56:24<br>Marty<br>But I think personally, I would say we should not comply, shouldn't fill this out at all. Everybody, like you said, should get legal representation and fight this. And that's because over the last three days now two days, I've been having conversations with different people in the industry. And that's I think we should use this platform to say like it seems like there's a number of people ranging from the largest miners in the country to small private miners that are having these individual conversations.  </p>
<p>00:16:56:24 - 00:17:21:23<br>Marty<br>And there needs to be some way for everybody to get together and have a coordinated action together in solidarity against this, because I think there could definitely be individual actors who want to be the ones who fight this fight. But I do think there's a need for solidarity across the industry to fight this this particular aggression.  </p>
<p>00:17:21:26 - 00:17:43:00<br>Jason<br>Yeah, And I think that like that word and I read your newsletter and it could, you know, feel your scent sense of it. And I think you're right. Like when you started to say at first maybe this seemed like a positive thing, right? Like they want to learn more information, but as you look more and understand the purpose of it, it doesn't seem like it's just simply, you know, let's do a fact finding mission.  </p>
<p>00:17:43:00 - 00:18:04:13<br>Jason<br>And of course, the problem is we don't kind of cooperate then where they can say, well, see, they have all this stuff to hide, even though we're doing things like helping balancing the grid, that the funny thing is think about this for a second. Like, what's your least favorite U.S. agency of of all or most Americans? What would you say that the agency they dislike the most?  </p>
<p>00:18:04:15 - 00:18:07:23<br>Marty<br>MM The IRS.  </p>
<p>00:18:07:25 - 00:18:34:13<br>Jason<br>Perfect. So even with the IRS, when you and I file taxes, it's not about this mandatory compliance that if you get if you don't get your taxes perfect, you're going to like go to jail. It's I'm reporting based on what my records are. And then if there's a problem, you can come in and audit me. What I don't understand is if they really genuinely wanted to figure out what this process was of how the energy is used by Bitcoin, miners have it be a self-reporting mechanism.  </p>
<p>00:18:34:13 - 00:18:57:15<br>Jason<br>You know, just like you report in your taxes. Like I said, no one likes to even do that. But as the miners send in the information, don't send out, you know, this form saying it's mandatory. And if you do anything wrong, it could be a criminal violation. It's and that's where it's something. Unfortunately, everyone has to get used to in this industry is it's treating us like criminals.  </p>
<p>00:18:57:15 - 00:19:13:15<br>Jason<br>Right. Like it's kind of we have to hit you over the head because you might not fill this out correctly because we don't really trust you in the first place. Plus, you're wasting all this energy instead of just saying, look, file your taxes, you know, maybe not your favorite thing and really won't be your favorite thing if we have to audit you later.  </p>
<p>00:19:13:15 - 00:19:32:27<br>Jason<br>But you know, you report to us and to me that's at a minimum. It's not great, right? No one like I said, no one likes the IRS. But you at least you report what you your income is. You know, that's always the joke, right? Did you cheat a little bit on your taxes? Whatever, Stuff like that. So if they want to learn all this information, they can pull it.  </p>
<p>00:19:32:27 - 00:19:56:05<br>Jason<br>Pull that, do it that same way. But this is this is not in that just let's reported in like no criminal violations. If you don't know, just let's start collecting the information because we want to learn more and we want to see, you know, what we might want to do with this information and better understand maybe there's benefits to it and so it just doesn't give give us the benefit of the doubt.  </p>
<p>00:19:56:05 - 00:20:19:25<br>Jason<br>So at a minimum, I think this the way that some of this is worded needs to be changed. The form itself might be a problem or a violation of the way the form is put together. B The reason I say the legal representation is it's not even even if you had everything right, right. And even if you had, you know, you're minors, you know, you're like and everything the way the form says, you know, if you get something wrong.  </p>
<p>00:20:19:27 - 00:20:36:20<br>Jason<br>That's why I think everyone needs a lawyer to fill it out if you are going to fill it out. Because what if you get something wrong? It's it's like a bit of a catch 22. And so so there's lots of I think there's room. Luckily, we live in a country where there's room to get lawyers to help us with this.  </p>
<p>00:20:36:20 - 00:21:09:22<br>Jason<br>We don't just have to comply. And I think there's there needs to be some congressional light shed on why was this emergency announced and that, you know, the biggest problem to me is this price increase that Bitcoin went up in price. And so and their assumption that therefore that, you know, there's going to be more activity. You know it notably doesn't mention that to have having is coming up soon I'd love them to try to evaluate what that might mean to it but here we are and maybe to get the Bitcoin ETF.  </p>
<p>00:21:09:22 - 00:21:35:25<br>Jason<br>So like Cathie Wood and others involved in this conversation because you have all of Wall Street now benefiting from a spot Bitcoin ETF and this policy looks like it's a bit of a reaction to that. You know like and wouldn't put me it wouldn't put I wouldn't put it past sort of the progressive attitude in this country of the minute something starts to be successful in a capitalistic light, you know, New York, New York, embracing these Bitcoin ETFs, prices burning.  </p>
<p>00:21:35:25 - 00:21:55:02<br>Jason<br>And of course, it came back a little bit. You know, this is when we start to see that the liberals get really crazy, right? I'm not trying to take sides between like, you know, conservatives and but but that's what they tend to do. They tend to just start go in and use these backdoor mechanisms to get what they want anyway, even if it's really already been decided.  </p>
<p>00:21:55:02 - 00:22:17:11<br>Jason<br>This is sort of policy. You know, there wasn't like a notice of rule saying, we're thinking about doing this and everyone respond or us respond and treat us like professionals and say this is the kind of information you should be looking at if you're really interested in learning about the energy use of this industry. This is just let's use the mechanism of the state to get what we want and because because they're terrified.  </p>
<p>00:22:17:12 - 00:22:24:09<br>Jason<br>They're terrified now that there's all these Bitcoin ETFs that that Bitcoin might win and succeed.  </p>
<p>00:22:24:11 - 00:22:50:02<br>Marty<br>Yeah, you can go back to the congressional point to the is that a way to prevent this from moving forward is if somebody in Congress was like, hey, why was the emergency authorization used? Like, shouldn't this go through Congress, go through a vote first, think, is there a roundabout way where Congress could stand up, say, you should have passed this through us first, like you know, the authority to do this?  </p>
<p>00:22:50:04 - 00:23:16:28<br>Jason<br>Yeah, it doesn't it doesn't actually have to be a vote of Congress. But every federal agency has oversight from a committee. And right now there's the House Energy and Commerce Committee that would have oversight. So that the chair of that committee, Cathy McMorris Rodgers from the state of Washington, could call a hearing or or request information as to why this was asked for.  </p>
<p>00:23:17:00 - 00:23:52:13<br>Jason<br>I'm not sure how much of a bitcoiners she is, but I do know she supports some of the broader, you know, concepts of like us being competitive against China. But that's really what you want is you want some chair of a committee who has oversight over this agency to send a letter immediately, send a letter asking questions like, you know, a letter that would say within two weeks, please explain what this is, what resources may be already deployed, you know, questions about it and maybe even say, maybe even in the letter request.  </p>
<p>00:23:52:13 - 00:24:07:00<br>Jason<br>Please wait on, you know, wait on this hold off like a month until you come before Congress and can really explain what you're going to be going out and doing with all of this information. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:24:07:02 - 00:24:16:05<br>Marty<br>So how do you think the next six months plays out, ideally in your mind?  </p>
<p>00:24:16:07 - 00:24:51:25<br>Jason<br>Ideally, I think that people might take enough exception to this. It might affect the outcome of the elect presidential election. And a lot of this might be reversed because right now this is a symptom of the Biden administration and the overwhelmingly progressive influence from Senator Warren. I think what I hope plays out and what I think you'll see, Marty, is you'll see people come to us in this community because people will realize that this can happen to this one industry.  </p>
<p>00:24:51:25 - 00:25:12:18<br>Jason<br>It can happen to any industry. And when you look at the amount of information that they're asking for, the degree to which they're doing it, it's a stifling of innovation. So I think that my hope would be in the next six months that they curtail this and that a lot of the large miners have already given information to Senator Elizabeth Warren.  </p>
<p>00:25:12:21 - 00:25:41:12<br>Jason<br>You know, so maybe leave it at these these are what the large commercial miners are. And I mean, hopefully get something like this shut down to the degree that there's enough pressure right. From Congress to say this is an overreach on administrative level. And I think you're going to have a huge lack of noncompliance. And I don't say that to say people are going to listen to your show and say, know, I'm not going to sign it.  </p>
<p>00:25:41:20 - 00:26:04:20<br>Jason<br>I think some people just won't. They they'll look at it. They won't be sure how to answer it. Some people may not even be aware they fall into this classification. I mean, there's been no notice, no press, no explanation how to do it. This is not like a friendly visit from, you know, your your postal service person. This is like, you know, coming from a place of investigation.  </p>
<p>00:26:04:20 - 00:26:15:16<br>Jason<br>So I really have a hard time seeing how they're going to get the results they want if, in fact, they do pull all this stuff between now and June.  </p>
<p>00:26:15:18 - 00:26:51:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah, and it's funny, the justification is you need to do this to make sure that our grids are secure and our energy systems are secure and everything this administration has done is a complete projection onto the Bitcoin industry specifically. But I wrote it in the newsletter. So if you want to stabilize the grids, make sure that you're building more reliable baseload and spin up the leases on federal lands again, maybe finish the Keystone XL pipeline, maybe take all the red tape off of nuclear power generation.  </p>
<p>00:26:51:27 - 00:27:39:02<br>Marty<br>There's many other lower hanging fruits that the government could take advantage of instead of attacking a specific industry. And that's that's where I think the signal is, is they have to know this to some extent. And do they really care about Bitcoin's energy use or are they using this, as you mentioned earlier, as an attack vector to hinder Bitcoin's proliferation throughout the economy and its adoption by individuals that could something like this, the survey go out, the data come back, and the government either manipulate the data or present it in a disingenuous way to fearmonger about all the energy that Bitcoin is sucking up.  </p>
<p>00:27:39:04 - 00:28:11:13<br>Jason<br>Yeah. Or come up with policies for the electricity providers, right? Who like maybe limit the amount of electricity they would be willing to give to this industry. There's there's this is this is where you would say like this the dam has broke. Right. And we're now is this now the era of like Bitcoin mining regulation and what that looks like in the US where there's actual federal regulations around the way you can mine Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:28:11:15 - 00:28:30:00<br>Marty<br>I hope it doesn't get to that point. That's one thing I wonder too, like talking about allies not only within the industry but across industries. I mean, I've seen it up close and personal. I'm very involved with multiple mining operations throughout the country, in the utilities companies that we work with love us because we're able to provide them more revenue.  </p>
<p>00:28:30:00 - 00:28:57:10<br>Marty<br>They can buy power in bulk passes, lower prices on to residents. That's an but still it's still early in that relationship between the energy sector and the Bitcoin mining sector. But this is something I've been saying at conferences and events over the last few months is like, we really need to get allies in the energy sector and help leverage their lobby to come help us put our case forward.  </p>
<p>00:28:57:10 - 00:29:24:09<br>Marty<br>Like, Hey, this is actually really good for our energy systems and our companies, our bottom lines and our ability to reinvest in infrastructure. That's that's one thing I'm hopeful will materialize. But now with this this registry for going out there, it seems like the time is and I need to convince those in the energy sector to think we're valuable economic partners to come come help us fight this.  </p>
<p>00:29:24:09 - 00:29:32:22<br>Marty<br>And as you mentioned, like West Virginia versus the EPA, they've certainly gone through this before. And is that the Chevron deference case as well, or is that separately?  </p>
<p>00:29:32:24 - 00:29:34:11<br>Jason<br>That's that's the one.  </p>
<p>00:29:34:14 - 00:29:35:06<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:29:35:08 - 00:30:02:00<br>Jason<br>So also, you know, if you remember like that, there's things ebb and flow in DC. We're in an election year. There's this one great documentary. I've got to try to find it, but it shows really like the cycles of the way Democrat presidents care about, like ESG, and they show them like putting solar panels on top of the White House and the like.  </p>
<p>00:30:02:00 - 00:30:20:12<br>Jason<br>As soon as Trump moves in or Bush moves in, they send construction workers on top of the White House and they take hammers. They knock the solar panels down, throw them off the roofs, you know, put them away for four years until the Democrat comes back. So what I guess I'm saying is, I mean, this is it seems a lot right now to us, right, Because this just happened.  </p>
<p>00:30:20:12 - 00:30:58:09<br>Jason<br>It's like, what does it mean? There's a lot of unknown. It's kind of scary. But you know, within a year, if there's a new administration, like all of us could go away really, really fast. And I think that's to me, like the hope at this point, because this there's just this is this is like epic level of of FUD about Bitcoin energy use and it's likely that this was scrambled in an emergency way because they know that if it's under a new administration, whether it's Trump, Haley or whoever, they're not going to put somebody in charge of an agency and do anything like this to Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:30:58:12 - 00:31:26:14<br>Jason<br>And I hate that Bitcoin has to become partizan that way. But I think for right now that's at least what it will take all of this kind of reporting stuff to go away. It's it's President Biden's and a little unusual that he's really really focused on ESG. And I and I've talked about this on other podcasts before, too, of you know, we hit this real roadblock with this administration because they decided to look at digital assets for the first time.  </p>
<p>00:31:26:20 - 00:31:47:19<br>Jason<br>You know, we had the huge market growth. Everything bubbled up and we just so happened to come across like a president that isn't just your average Democratic, you know, president who kind of cares about the environment, but has made it his number one priority. And so when you had those that really weren't fans of Bitcoin, you know, say, look, this is well, we know it's not.  </p>
<p>00:31:47:19 - 00:32:14:06<br>Jason<br>But look, use of energy, it's completely contrary to your objectives. We're not going to get, you know, to your goals in 2050 Bitcoin. It's going to destroy the planet, which, you know, was born. It said as much in some hearings. We have to stop Bitcoin. It's destroying the planet. It was his number one priority as a president. And so I think that that is why you're seeing this today is the last couple of days, this emergency thing go through because it is a priority of President Biden.  </p>
<p>00:32:14:09 - 00:32:37:00<br>Jason<br>This is his number one priority. And and so that we've they've hit upon the idea of what proof of work is. They feel like it used a lot of energy. And to them, it's like backwards. It's like we're going back to the coal era to the and it doesn't think through all the things that, you know, you've so eloquently talked about with maybe we need to go back to nuclear or anything like that.  </p>
<p>00:32:37:03 - 00:33:13:17<br>Jason<br>It's just like up here, we go back, we're just taking steps backward when it's an emerging innovation, Right? It's it's a new kind of money. It has so many possible uses, not just on the mining side, but so many uses in society. And it's just so we just kind of hit this really bad. It's bad timing because we just had a president who has been unusually worried about the environment and has been pandering for the most part to a lot of the environmental groups on a lot of these issues, not just Bitcoin, a lot of the, you know, energy industries have been facing this now for the last few years with the ESG narrative.  </p>
<p>00:33:13:19 - 00:33:50:22<br>Marty<br>Yeah, which is hilarious considering we just have to look over the Atlantic to Europe and I think they went first with this aggressive net zero energy policy and it's been extremely detrimental to their quality of life and the stability of their energy systems. And they rely a lot reliability of their energy systems and again, it is nonsensical in an election year considering that most of his first term has been plagued by high inflation and particularly in the energy sector, which has come down over the last year.  </p>
<p>00:33:50:22 - 00:34:13:07<br>Marty<br>But there's what's going on in the Middle East. The price of oil could certainly go much higher rather quickly if things escalate there. And it's just weird that they're doubling down on this ESG policy when it's an abject failure. Every everywhere you look that it's been implemented at full scale.  </p>
<p>00:34:13:09 - 00:34:26:20<br>Jason<br>Absolutely. And there's been a lot of folks who are now talking about reversing the ESG rate, like people are saying, we're going to get rid of this, you know, as soon as this is definitely going to be something that's going to affect, you know, the election.  </p>
<p>00:34:26:22 - 00:35:10:02<br>Marty<br>Yeah, And that's that's the other weird thing, too, is like obviously, I've been a notorious anti-gay advocate. But I mean, if you look at it, just like off grid miners reducing methane emissions, if you care about ESG, Bitcoin is a perfect vehicle to sort of bring about a more efficient energy system, whether it's offered or all great on grid solves the and yes, the social side of things where it's okay if these miners can come in and create grid stability and create stronger revenue streams for individual utility providers or power plants, I think that allows them to have a stronger balance sheet which will allow them to get more creative.  </p>
<p>00:35:10:02 - 00:35:18:21<br>Marty<br>The pricing, which typically benefits residential consumers with with lower prices.  </p>
<p>00:35:18:24 - 00:35:47:21<br>Jason<br>Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. You know, I know that you don't want it necessarily to come to this, but my my vision sort of three or four years out would be we're still going to be able to mine Bitcoin. But the larger commercial enterprises, a Bitcoin think of somebody who shows up from Washington DC in a suit and tie and, you know, puts on a hard hat and you know, is the, you know, Bitcoin mining inspector right?  </p>
<p>00:35:47:23 - 00:36:07:06<br>Jason<br>And you know, it's going to poke around, you know, look at what you're giving back to the grid, you know, questioning your practices. I don't think we'll get to like it won't be Venezuela. They won't co-opt it. I don't think they'll they'll never shut down something because remember that the same government loves and counts on our tax money.  </p>
<p>00:36:07:06 - 00:36:39:21<br>Jason<br>Right. So they'll how can we tax Bitcoin? How can we tax these these businesses to bring revenue back to the government? But I think the end game is that at least for the larger Bitcoin miners, this is the sustainable path, no pun intended is I think four or five years from now you might see sort of these inspectors from the the DOE to come out and just poke around like they do any other any other aspect of energy production.  </p>
<p>00:36:39:23 - 00:37:01:06<br>Jason<br>And I'm not saying that's a good outcome, but I like because I think we'd still be able to to to do Bitcoin mining. I just think we we might be seeing the era of, of, of regulation of Bitcoin mining in some degree or another in this country because, you know, as you said, it's like A.C. but we've just we've moved in this country so far away of just basic freedoms.  </p>
<p>00:37:01:06 - 00:37:06:21<br>Jason<br>It's hard to imagine that an industry could ever just be left alone entirely.  </p>
<p>00:37:06:24 - 00:37:34:21<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I've hope we can get back to it. Hopefully Bitcoin succeeds and they don't have all the money they need to to burden us with the pencil pushers and the scrutiny. It's just insane because when you think the innovation, the Bitcoin mining has brought the energy system, it's like palpable, it's tangible, it's very clear in the data. The data is there, it's out.  </p>
<p>00:37:34:21 - 00:37:59:19<br>Marty<br>That's the most frustrating thing about this is they're asking for data that's already public that they could easily find in public filings by companies like Riot, Marathon, Iris, whatever it may be, stronghold like strongholds doing alone to solve the waste coal problem that exist in Pennsylvania. That should be something that people are cheering on. There's this weird vendetta.  </p>
<p>00:37:59:21 - 00:38:19:14<br>Marty<br>I think it's because they can't control Bitcoin, the asset or the network. At the end of the day, mining is just the attack vector they've chosen because it's very visible and physical. So it's literally a physical attack vector that can be pinpointed and attacked.  </p>
<p>00:38:19:16 - 00:38:45:18<br>Jason<br>It's funny that you say that too, like for riot and Marathon and these are others brings bears to mind. Well, this type of activity allows the larger Bitcoin miners to get bigger because you might have a lot of people who are smaller commercial miners who maybe can't afford or don't have to pay for a lawyer to fill out this form or might just be kind of, you know, straight up intimidated by the form to say this is not worth our business.  </p>
<p>00:38:45:18 - 00:39:22:25<br>Jason<br>If if this is, you know, the US government's asking for all this information, it's turn off the mines and turn off the miners. So it might create a little bit more consolidation, which isn't a good thing, right? We need the decentralization. We need the smaller miners as well as the larger miners. But that's that's part of my fear with this is not just about the the substance of the form, but the manner in which it's being delivered and the business decisions that might come, you know, come up for people saying, well, you know, I'll fill out the form this one time, but I'm getting out of this business because it's, you know, clearly this is  </p>
<p>00:39:22:25 - 00:39:42:00<br>Jason<br>something that, you know, I don't want to like. Now they're asking who my electrician tricity providers are. So there's this element of I guess it's kind of intimidation, right, that we're just extra burden, extra regulatory burden. You know, why would I want to be involved in this? So it's going to take the true believers to kind of push back.  </p>
<p>00:39:42:00 - 00:40:13:03<br>Jason<br>And, you know, one thing that's been done in the past was about it was more about like the Bitcoin core developers in turn. Remember, it was like in 2016, but there were these like 50 lawyers in DC that got together and started offering like pro-bono help. So that I mean, that could be something like something I'll think about, like how can we coordinate to help get, you know, pro-bono help for people who are going to be getting these forms so they don't just walk away from the business and also so they can feel protected, you know, if they choose to answer the form.  </p>
<p>00:40:13:06 - 00:40:47:27<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I guess that dovetails into a broader topic, which is the state know of Bitcoin, the Bitcoin industry's influence over policy, which you touched on in the beginning. But what would you like to see in terms of the industry really getting smart about interacting with the federal government despite whether or not we would like to do it seems that you do have to play ball to a certain degree just to protect your interests and the profitability of your business and the ability to to exist at all in the first place.  </p>
<p>00:40:48:00 - 00:40:53:24<br>Marty<br>Like, have we made progress in recent years? Is it happening fast enough?  </p>
<p>00:40:53:26 - 00:41:17:11<br>Jason<br>Yeah, I think we've made progress. Like, I mean, I'll toot the Bitcoin Policy Institute's horn, you know, I'm an adviser to them, but they responded. They engaged with the White House when they were looking at it and some of their report did talk about the benefits of Bitcoin mining. So it's it's not this is just one administrator and and his sort of, dare I say, narrow view of what Bitcoin is and what the way it should be handled.  </p>
<p>00:41:17:13 - 00:41:41:11<br>Jason<br>But there has been open reception to the possibilities of the benefits for Bitcoin mining. And so I think we need to curate that. My belief for a long time has been we need to create something akin to whether it's the NRA. People don't like that because they feel like it's just this far right or something. Of the AARP, I mentioned the idea of the NRA.  </p>
<p>00:41:41:11 - 00:42:12:07<br>Jason<br>I'm like the Progressive Bitcoiners podcast and they didn't like that. How are we going to sell that to progressive Democrats? But you call it the AARP. But if you have a group of people, even if they're in a minority and they believe in something strong enough, you need that that grassroots support, which the playing ball part is finding some smart people right in Washington, DC, who are also believers and who know who to speak to in power, who know how.  </p>
<p>00:42:12:09 - 00:42:50:20<br>Jason<br>Washington, DC works, you know, understanding, you know, who to go talk to, the right people. And if you think about anytime there's an action that the NRA doesn't like, I mean, it's instantly stopped. You know, it's very hard to get any kind of bill right regarding, you know, guns and Second Amendment issues. So the idea of the Fourth Amendment and finding that that narrative to go with the fact that there's all these people out there that believe Bitcoin, that care about it, that maybe you're willing to, you know, like you do with NRA, you know, chip in ten or 15 bucks, you get a magazine.  </p>
<p>00:42:50:20 - 00:43:31:09<br>Jason<br>But, you know, you have your support, build that up. I think that doesn't exist yet for us. It's it's starting to like BPI is a good start. But remember, it's a51c3 nonprofit. So it doesn't actually, you know, go and try to change policy or change legislation directly with lobbying. So I think as Bitcoin gets bigger and there's like the Bitcoin ETF are growing and other things that, you know, getting a getting a good crew of Bitcoin lobbyists that can organize a grassroots campaign that would already be instead of you and me talking like this, we already be in front of the right officials trying to, you know, get this changed or get this modified or  </p>
<p>00:43:31:11 - 00:43:52:06<br>Jason<br>to be quite honest, this is already kind of done right. The forms already printed and everything. The idea in DC is you want to try to get something before it's complete. So like, you know, you maybe have the right people in play who like this is sort of the rumblings of what's going to happen and they can run to the White House to sort of say, no, this you should you better not declare an emergency on like Bitcoin mining that's, you know, absurd.  </p>
<p>00:43:52:06 - 00:44:12:15<br>Jason<br>So I do think that's the kind of juice that that we need to protect Bitcoin. It it it goes very antithetical to the way a lot of people, including myself, believe. Like I've always said, I'll teach anybody how you go talk to your congressman or talk to your, you know, local representative. I don't want to be like an intermediary or a middleman.  </p>
<p>00:44:12:17 - 00:44:40:13<br>Jason<br>I want it to be peer to peer, you know, But it's one degree or another to have the right messengers and build that grassroots support is going to be necessary to protect kind of the core tenants of what Bitcoin is about. And it's so great the, you know, the rights of property, the right to code. There's so many aspects of this that makes it so much in the American spirit, the American way that, you know, that's what I hope we can find.  </p>
<p>00:44:40:13 - 00:45:01:08<br>Jason<br>I think that would be a really exciting kind of grassroots movement to get together with. And, you know, I'll say this like some people in Bitcoin I've spoken to before on this and they know I'm a lobbyist and everything. And, you know, they kind of the question always comes up, Marty, and the debate into, well, why do we need you?  </p>
<p>00:45:01:08 - 00:45:17:01<br>Jason<br>You know, we don't want to lobby. We're just going to do our own thing and just sort of ignore like what DC does. And the problem with that is that there's people in DC to care about what you're doing. And this is like case in point, you know, if you just sort of ignore them, then they come up with all these things and they make up their own stories.  </p>
<p>00:45:17:01 - 00:45:37:14<br>Jason<br>So you just at some point or another, if enough people decide you have your own storytellers there to kind of protect the turf and as Bitcoin gets bigger, I think we're going to need that at some point to make it so we don't have these overbearing type actions. We're getting there. We're seeing some reactions. You know, BP was on the phone all day yesterday.  </p>
<p>00:45:37:14 - 00:45:54:20<br>Jason<br>You know, David Zell and that group trying to figure out what to do or not quite there yet, where we have sort of the juice of an NRA or something to kind of just step in and push back. And I think most people in Bitcoin will come around and realizing this is part of the game. We need to just play that for now so.  </p>
<p>00:45:54:22 - 00:46:26:21<br>Marty<br>We'll know we've made it. When the NBA is synonymous with the National Bitcoin Association and the National Basketball Association. And so that's the goal for is to get there. One last topic to touch on, which I think is important to bring up is states standing up for companies in their borders. Obviously, there's a big federal or state standoff coming going on down here in Texas right now at the border.  </p>
<p>00:46:26:21 - 00:46:48:06<br>Marty<br>We saw that trend of states asserting their autonomy from the federal government during COVID lockdowns. That seems like something that is becoming more prominent in terms of national. The states standing up and say, now we're going to do our own thing. You see states standing up for their companies in their borders, regards the federal government, or would that be important?  </p>
<p>00:46:48:06 - 00:46:50:24<br>Marty<br>At the end of the day?  </p>
<p>00:46:50:27 - 00:47:12:23<br>Jason<br>You know, I think that would be pretty powerful. I mean, when like DeSantis tried to do the whole anti cbdc thing or say, in Florida, we're not going to have a cbdc. I mean, the government prints money at the federal level and it's not really I don't know that the law would be effective, but like talking about Texas and the border and that too, to that point, this is about a form.  </p>
<p>00:47:12:23 - 00:47:39:07<br>Jason<br>And if this is affecting, you know, your state and local businesses, I mean, this is just a classic case of federal overreach. You'll likely have a lot of state opposition to it. And, you know, the one thought I had when you were sort of sharing that, it's like, you know, with Bitcoin, it's about the consensus. Right. And a lot of times in government when these programs start, it's a lot about like consensus and like, do you get the results?  </p>
<p>00:47:39:07 - 00:47:57:25<br>Jason<br>So like, you know, you send in, you know, people with the badge, you know, the enforcers and saying here and fill out these forms. But like if enough people don't fill out the forms or don't comply, you know, that's they don't have enough of a consensus. They don't have enough of the information that way. It's possible they just walk away.  </p>
<p>00:47:57:25 - 00:48:14:06<br>Jason<br>You know, they've already come up with their own conclusions. They already put out yesterday on their website how much Bitcoin energy is using and looks like they have all this data in there, you know, talking about want to do this, you know, very careful data collection practices. The problems with these jokers is it's not like a geological survey.  </p>
<p>00:48:14:06 - 00:48:31:29<br>Jason<br>You know, there's actual people and businesses that you're exploring and kicking the tires around. And it's a it's a violation of privacy. So absolutely. I mean, if if we're willing to if you sort of start seeing what's happening, the dynamics in Texas right now. Right. But the border is about filling out a form is that state reps just say we're not filling it out.  </p>
<p>00:48:32:03 - 00:48:39:10<br>Jason<br>You know, our companies won't fill it out for you and create a federal versus state. Yeah. Standoff.  </p>
<p>00:48:39:12 - 00:49:04:23<br>Marty<br>Wow. This that's what I love to hear. Getting excited is talk. The rent is too damn high, the government is too damn big. Get out of our life. It's. It's funny. I mean, again, it's just, uh. Yeah, this stuff should be expected that Conor has been talking about these hypothetical adversarial situations for a decade and a half now.  </p>
<p>00:49:04:26 - 00:49:50:13<br>Marty<br>I mean, and it should be expected. It just is disconcerting when you finally have it's like, Oh, God, here we go again. We got a spend bunch of money and get a bunch of lawyers, write a bunch of newsletters, articles, get some data and fight back, spend a bunch of money to do this. And that's the frustrating thing, I think, for a lot of people in this industry, because I think, as you would agree, that the innovation that's happening, whether it's within the mining industry, at the payments layer, at the just sound digital money layer, it's extremely exciting and extremely encouraging for all of humanity to think that a bunch of 70 to 90 year  </p>
<p>00:49:50:13 - 00:50:14:23<br>Marty<br>old individuals in DC who really don't understand or maybe they do understand, but just don't like Bitcoin from a philosophical and ideological perspective are going to try to throw the baby out of the window because they don't like it and it's just get out of the way. And so it's very frustrating.  </p>
<p>00:50:14:25 - 00:50:40:24<br>Jason<br>I mean, it's hard to believe we're about to have a potential presidential contest where people in like eight decades of life each like where's the hope? Where's the JFK or whoever you want to call it, right of out of our time. And and I think one thing that probably would be helpful would be to show Washington, DC the faces of like what Bitcoin mining is about, make sure that they're real people, real jobs, real professions.  </p>
<p>00:50:40:24 - 00:50:58:12<br>Jason<br>I think that's what we need to get to because right now they're they're kind of able to dehumanize it. You know, it's like Bitcoin itself. It doesn't really exist. We don't know what it does, but it waste all this energy, you know, showing stories of people who've made, you know, careers for themselves, you know, hire people, you know, get involved in the industry.  </p>
<p>00:50:58:15 - 00:51:30:10<br>Jason<br>And they're being responsible about the energy use. Right. Working with grids. You know, there's a there's a powerful story to tell, you know, for the Bitcoin mining community. And I think, you know, if we can figure out a way to tell it correctly, you know, then then that's something that can can push back on this One thing, you know, just like with the, you know, the 51% attack is, you know, realize some of these folks like the environmental groups, this kind of this angle of attack, it's not going to go away.  </p>
<p>00:51:30:12 - 00:51:48:27<br>Jason<br>It's always going to attack it. Just the way will always be attackers, the Bitcoin network. We just have to make sure the incentives are aligned in such a way where we're able to keep, yeah, the sound money and everything else, you know, dream alive here in the U.S. And I think that it's they picked the wrong country to try to pull this kind of stuff in.  </p>
<p>00:51:48:29 - 00:51:52:07<br>Marty<br>Yeah, we're going to win, Jason. We're going to win.  </p>
<p>00:51:52:09 - 00:51:52:24<br>Jason<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:51:52:26 - 00:52:11:24<br>Marty<br>It's not going to be easy, but nothing worth doing was ever easy. So, look, luckily we have individuals like yourself who understand these problems very intricately can help advise us as we're fighting this. And thank you for hopping on the part. I mean, you did me yesterday. I was like, Can you record tomorrow? I think it's a pretty important sell.  </p>
<p>00:52:11:27 - 00:52:15:09<br>Marty<br>Thank you for coming around quickly to have this conversation.  </p>
<p>00:52:15:11 - 00:52:17:21<br>Jason<br>Absolutely. As you're talking to Imani.  </p>
<p>00:52:17:23 - 00:52:33:28<br>Marty<br>Yeah. I think we'll post this right away at Logan just to get it out there, because the time it's time we're pressed for time. The clock is ticking. We need to really begin coordinating and in fighting back against this, I think we'll win, though.  </p>
<p>00:52:34:00 - 00:52:35:02<br>Jason<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:52:35:04 - 00:52:44:03<br>Marty<br>So where can anybody listen to this? Find out more about you, what you're doing, and how you can help.  </p>
<p>00:52:44:05 - 00:53:10:23<br>Jason<br>Yeah. Demi at my date, my Twitter handles at regulatory. Jason And also reach out to the Bitcoin policy Institute that's at BTC policy and you know we can direct you to sort of your resources as I can definitely share you know start to think about a list of lawyers that I want to put together to maybe get people support any questions at all.  </p>
<p>00:53:10:28 - 00:53:30:24<br>Jason<br>You know, you want to figure out how to talk to politicians. Maybe I'll work on like sort of like a letter or something you can start to send in. But at the end of the day, like it's it's important to just not just fill out this fact. There's lots of reasons, you know, talk to your business advisors, consultants, lawyers before you just fill out this form because it's already February.  </p>
<p>00:53:30:24 - 00:53:38:29<br>Jason<br>Right. And they said they're going to start the first week of February. That's Monday, right? That's in three days. So yeah, yeah. Just DM me on Twitter. I'll get back to you.  </p>
<p>00:53:39:01 - 00:53:54:09<br>Marty<br>Awesome. We'll link to Jason's Twitter, the Bitcoin Policy Institute's Twitter in the notes, so go check those out. And Jason, thank you again. Extremely important work. I'm sure we'll be talking about this again at some point in the next six months.  </p>
<p>00:53:54:12 - 00:53:57:12<br>Jason<br>Sounds great, honor. Be on your show, Marty Quick then.  </p>
<p>00:53:57:15 - 00:54:02:28<br>Marty<br>Tell everybody at the Bitcoin Jawn I said, What's up on Monday? Got it. All right. Peace, love freaks. Okay.</p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:image href="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/02/479-Jason-Brett.png"/>
      </item>
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[How DEI Is Weakening The Military | Matthew Lohmeier]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[This rip with Lt. Col. Matt Lohmeier highlights critical concerns regarding DEI initiatives in the U.S. military and their potential to weaken the military's core mission. ]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This rip with Lt. Col. Matt Lohmeier highlights critical concerns regarding DEI initiatives in the U.S. military and their potential to weaken the military's core mission. ]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:03:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iohow-dei-is-weakening-the-military/</link>
      <comments>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iohow-dei-is-weakening-the-military/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qqexsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj76r0wukkgetf945hxtthv4skketwd9hxwtt5dpjj6mtfd35hgctj0yhsygpgy34wakm8efaj2qwtvkqdcqktz2cze2kw68mjnwmpjhgx9vgg45psgqqqw4rs3n82c8</guid>
      <category>TFTC Podcast</category>
      
        <media:content url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/478-Matthew-Lohmeier.png" medium="image"/>
        <enclosure 
          url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/478-Matthew-Lohmeier.png" length="0" 
          type="image/png" 
        />
      <noteId>naddr1qqexsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj76r0wukkgetf945hxtthv4skketwd9hxwtt5dpjj6mtfd35hgctj0yhsygpgy34wakm8efaj2qwtvkqdcqktz2cze2kw68mjnwmpjhgx9vgg45psgqqqw4rs3n82c8</noteId>
      <npub>npub19qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksn4zc3g</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrib]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/how-dei-is-weakening-the-military/">Read original post</a></p>
<h2>Key Takeaways</h2>
<h3><strong>The Problem of DEI in the Military:</strong></h3>
<ul>
<li>The podcast features Lt. Col. Matt Lohmeier, who addresses the issue of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the military.</li>
<li>Lohmeier noticed ideological shifts within the military post-George Floyd's death that aligned with the social unrest seen across the country.</li>
<li>The military began to focus on DEI initiatives after the reversal of Trump's executive order banning critical race theory by President Biden.</li>
<li>DEI initiatives have led to division and a decrease in morale, impacting recruitment and retention within the military.</li>
<li>Lohmeier argues that promoting based on race, gender, or sexual preference, instead of merit, undermines the military's effectiveness.</li>
<li>He suggests that DEI, as it currently stands, is fundamentally racist and diminishes individual agency.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The Need for Strong Military Principles:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The military's purpose is to fight and win wars; politicizing the military with DEI initiatives corrupts its core mission.</li>
<li>A strong military requires a merit-based system free from political agendas.</li>
<li>Lohmeier emphasizes the importance of a strong economy and military might in determining a country's power.</li>
<li>The conversation also touches on the broader issues facing the United States, such as border security, political sovereignty, and the potential overextension of military forces.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Potential Solutions and Actions:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Changes at the administration level could reverse damaging policies.</li>
<li>Grassroots involvement in local government and school boards can protect communities' values.</li>
<li>Speaking up within the military against politicization and advocating for a return to mission-focused values is crucial.</li>
<li>Encourages the silent majority to use their voices against the current cultural and political madness.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Links</h2>
<p>Follow Matt on <a href="https://twitter.com/matthewlohmeier?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>Check out <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Irresistible-Revolution-Marxisms-Conquest-Unmaking/dp/1737067323/ref=asc_df_1737067323/?tag=hyprod-20&amp;linkCode=df0&amp;hvadid=334204344421&amp;hvpos=&amp;hvnetw=g&amp;hvrand=15841849355427727081&amp;hvpone=&amp;hvptwo=&amp;hvqmt=&amp;hvdev=c&amp;hvdvcmdl=&amp;hvlocint=&amp;hvlocphy=9028279&amp;hvtargid=pla-1276437226252&amp;psc=1&amp;mcid=f5e282d9f8f03d1ea779aea77bfb2617&amp;gclid=CjwKCAiA_OetBhAtEiwAPTeQZ7hHrhNDyhyXNcRU8hqDE3dDMnUS-1i5rWeScten_yKOHtDEM-2RnxoCo8oQAvD_BwE&amp;ref=tftc.io"><em>Irresistible Revolution: Marxism’s Goal of Conquest &amp; the Unmaking of the American Military</em></a></p>
<h2>Sponsors</h2>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h1>Best Quotes</h1>
<ol>
<li>"The purpose of the United States military is to fight and win our nation’s wars."</li>
<li>"We want a relatively apolitical military. And so when you have an entire industry that is steeped in politics, and in this case, race identity politics, and now every other agenda under the sun... you run into the division that you’re talking about."</li>
<li>"There's no logic behind the cult-like ideologically driven policy implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives."</li>
<li>"DEI as a construct is extremely racist in and of itself. It completely takes away the agency of individuals... and says we need to make carve-outs to put you individuals in this place."</li>
<li>"If you're not doing something unethical or illegal, then you should feel free to use your voice to say, I disagree with what I'm hearing, I disagree with what I'm seeing, and I have a different set of values, and you're offending me."</li>
</ol>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>This rip with Lt. Col. Matt Lohmeier highlights critical concerns regarding DEI initiatives in the U.S. military and their potential to weaken the military's core mission. Lohmeier's insights present a nuanced perspective on the importance of maintaining a merit-based, apolitical military structure to ensure readiness and effectiveness. The conversation also extends to the broader societal and political challenges facing the United States, suggesting that a miracle might be needed to reverse the current trajectory. However, Lohmeier offers practical advice for individuals who wish to enact change, emphasizing the power of local involvement and the necessity for the silent majority to find their voice. The discussion ultimately serves as a call to action for those concerned about the direction of the military and the country, to stand up for their values and work toward solutions that preserve the strength and integrity of the United States.</p>
<h2>Timestamps</h2>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>6:45 - Politics dividing the military<br>15:57 - Military of the best<br>22:28 - DEI harms those it “protects”<br>27:00 - US weakening is rapid and likely intentional<br>40:15 - What’s making us stronger?<br>47:12 - First steps to mending<br>54:18 - Call to the silent majority<br>50:03 - Money and incentives<br>1:02:15 - Define your values</p>
<p><strong>Transcript</strong></p>
<p>00:00:00:23 - 00:00:01:03<br>Matt<br>Great.  </p>
<p>00:00:03:04 - 00:00:05:25<br>Marty<br>Lieutenant Colonel Matt Longmire, thank you for joining the show.  </p>
<p>00:00:06:14 - 00:00:07:24<br>Matt<br>Sure. Happy to be here.  </p>
<p>00:00:08:18 - 00:00:32:17<br>Marty<br>Well, I saw you were on a subcommittee meeting for national security a couple of weeks ago explaining the problems that you've recognized as it pertains to the military and the encroachment of the I throughout the military. You wrote a book about this subject. It was irresistible Revolution, Marxism, Goal of Conquest and the Unmet Unmaking of the American military.  </p>
<p>00:00:32:18 - 00:01:06:03<br>Marty<br>So this is a problem you highlighted years ago. Began writing about sort of best seller on the subject. And thankfully, you were at the subcommittee meeting a couple of weeks ago to highlight this problem because it seems like it is a pretty massive problem when you look at recruitment rates and just the as an American citizen is not in the military outside looking in at everything that's been done over the last few years as it pertains to D-I quotas and just what seem like nonsensical decisions that have been made.  </p>
<p>00:01:06:04 - 00:01:17:29<br>Marty<br>It seems a bit crazy as an insider. Lieutenant Colonel was retired from Space Force that has identified this problem. When did you first recognize this problem and what exactly is the problem in your mind?  </p>
<p>00:01:18:22 - 00:01:45:16<br>Matt<br>Right. Well, you can spend an hour on a podcast talking about that, or you can spend four months writing a book about it and trying to inform people It's let me try and be succinct. And you think I get better at this, having spoken about it for like hundreds of hours and each new day brings the challenge of making sure I engage my brain properly to try and do the topic justice.  </p>
<p>00:01:45:17 - 00:02:12:15<br>Matt<br>So I it's probably helpful to say that I had spent 15 years on active duty in uniform before really recognizing that there was this particular problem that we're so readily and easily identifying as diversity, equity and inclusion, industry and training. Today, it's getting a lot of attention on social media primarily, and even in the mainstream media a little bit.  </p>
<p>00:02:12:15 - 00:03:05:05<br>Matt<br>Occasionally, if it's expedient or politically expedient, let's say. But it was to answer your question directly, it was in the summer of 2021, right after George Floyd's death that I noticed the same spiritual, energetic, ideological impulse that was tearing down the country in one sense through the smashing of windows and toppling of or the toppling of statues, the burning and flipping of police cars that people were seeing and the news being reported on in that late spring and summer time of 2020 in which the death of a black man was used as a pretext by left wing activists and anarchists to create strife, division, contention throughout the country.  </p>
<p>00:03:05:05 - 00:03:38:19<br>Matt<br>That same spirit and energy was very apparently manifest in the United States military all throughout every branch of the military in the uniformed services. And apparently also and I didn't know it at the time, throughout the federal agencies and in the fall of that year, President Trump issued an executive order banning critical race theory training, spanning anti-American trainings and the uniformed services and all federal agencies banning sex and race scapegoating as the way it was termed in his executive order.  </p>
<p>00:03:38:20 - 00:04:01:07<br>Matt<br>And that came at a time that provided great relief to the men and women in uniform because we had started to notice that our morale was being eroded and people were being divided about political talking points, ideological talking points. And so, by and large, that executive order helped kind of calm things in the fall of 2020 leading up to the election.  </p>
<p>00:04:01:24 - 00:04:26:13<br>Matt<br>And that was reversed by policy, by executive fiat on January 20th of 2021 by Joe Biden. So that's probably a good starting place. There's a thousand things that could be said about any number of those points that I've made. So if you want to dive into any of those specific points, we can or or I'll continue to elaborate.  </p>
<p>00:04:27:04 - 00:04:54:05<br>Marty<br>Well, I think before we dive into the specific points I get back to first principles is viewing the military and what it's trying to achieve and who it's trying to bring together. You would imagine that armed forces, the individuals that make up the military, come from both sides of the political spectrum. And they they agree that they want to protect the country and the ideals that it was founded on.  </p>
<p>00:04:54:05 - 00:05:19:15<br>Marty<br>And the rights that it's trying to protect and sort of have this bipartisan agreement by servicemen and women to to protect that. And the thought of this very hyper political ized movement eating into that, it seems like it's corrupting something that's very pure and very important to achieve the goals that the military sets out to achieve.  </p>
<p>00:05:20:02 - 00:05:43:05<br>Matt<br>Great points, and I'll elaborate on that just a little bit. I want to say a few things that are rather definitive. The purpose of the United States military is to fight and win our nation's wars. That's that's why states have militaries. And when I say states, I'm speaking of states in the international political sense, international relations speak sense.  </p>
<p>00:05:45:11 - 00:06:10:20<br>Matt<br>We need to be able to fight and win our nations wars. We hope through policy and through a strong military and a strong economy to deter violent conflict. And if deterrence fails, then you have a strong military to fight and win nations wars. They have military objectives that are employed, that are achieved in pursuit of certain political aims.  </p>
<p>00:06:11:13 - 00:06:41:07<br>Matt<br>So I want to go back to what you said about a kind of bipartisan contract between service members to do that job that they have. You can look at it that way in one sense, although there are many men and women in uniform who would rather be apolitical. And in fact, the obligation of those that serve in uniform is that in their day to day work life in the military workplace, they remain relatively apolitical.  </p>
<p>00:06:41:07 - 00:07:11:24<br>Matt<br>And I say relatively compared to the American people who are welcome to argue and bicker and complain and and fight with one another over policy and political ideas and agendas. And over which candidates are the best to be in office. They're welcome to those views as service members individually and in their private life. But what they are legally obligated to do is to avoid overt politics in the military workplace, because, as you've heard before, religion and politics divide.  </p>
<p>00:07:11:24 - 00:07:37:16<br>Matt<br>And so we don't talk about them at the dinner table except in the best of company. And so that's good advice for the men and women in uniform as well. We want a relatively apolitical military. And so when you have an entire industry that is steeped in politics and in this case race, identity politics and now every other agenda under the sun, identity politics that have various letters and things attached to their identities and their political agendas.  </p>
<p>00:07:38:25 - 00:08:18:05<br>Matt<br>In fact, I was just reading something about queer theory and the queer agenda yesterday. It was an academic writing. It wasn't a screed by any means or by any stretch of the imagination. And the queer theorists themselves define and pursue their agenda, which they define as against normativity, against the normal cultural, social bearing that any society has. The queer agenda is to disrupt and and agitate against what is considered normal and hence the term queer.  </p>
<p>00:08:18:06 - 00:08:33:16<br>Matt<br>It's different, it's odd. It's, you know, it always meant something else other than what we typically think of in our mind today. So my my point in bringing all of that up is you want the man and woman in uniform to not get caught up in all of that and simply be focused on being a good aircraft mechanic.  </p>
<p>00:08:33:25 - 00:09:01:05<br>Matt<br>Simply be focused on being a good space operator and provide GPS to troops downrange and to American citizens and our allies. You want people to fly their planes and not worry about this. So when you have an overtly political administration, every administration is political. When you have an an administration overtly politicized through policy, the military workplace, then you run into the division that you're talking about that impacts recruitment.  </p>
<p>00:09:01:07 - 00:09:12:04<br>Matt<br>It impacts our troops willingness to be retained retention and to continue serving and and a host of other problems we'll probably get into.  </p>
<p>00:09:12:27 - 00:09:28:23<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So what is the justification for these policies from the the politicians who've enacted them and you mentioned earlier that it was dicta, it wasn't really voted on, didn't go through Congress and go through.  </p>
<p>00:09:28:24 - 00:09:45:04<br>Matt<br>No, no, no. Yeah, it wasn't through Congress. Yeah, it was. It was a presidential edict. It was a it was it's an executive order. I mean, the executive branch has this authority to issue executive orders. Unfortunately, you can do a lot of damage and you can do a lot of good with that.  </p>
<p>00:09:49:12 - 00:10:19:19<br>Matt<br>I don't like the answer I'm about to give. Maybe because it's it might seem like a non-answer, but it's not. There is no logic, at least decent logic. There's no logic behind the cultlike ideological ideologically driven policy implementation of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. And I want to I want to give you an example just keeps coming back to my mind.  </p>
<p>00:10:19:19 - 00:10:50:10<br>Matt<br>And I almost said it right when we began. If you'll stick with me for just a minute on this, it'll seem like a tangent at first, but I just finished reading the book of First Samuel, and in that record you've got a body of people who are interested in their national identity. It was the children of Israel. You had a unique relationship that that body of people had with other nations.  </p>
<p>00:10:50:10 - 00:11:09:08<br>Matt<br>They didn't have a king. This is before Saul becomes the first king in Israel and the children of Israel demand the king of the prophet Samuel. And so Samuel says, I don't think that's a good idea. Well, he goes and talks to the Lord about things, and he says they want a king and the Lord says, Well, give them a king.  </p>
<p>00:11:09:13 - 00:11:30:26<br>Matt<br>It's not you that they reject. That's me. And there's a point I'm making about diversity, equity and inclusion. As I as I tell the story. Then the Lord informs Samuel what's going to happen when they select a king. He tells them all sorts of things. I won't get into that. Samuel then reports back to the children of Israel and he says, Hey, I'll give you a king.  </p>
<p>00:11:30:26 - 00:11:50:23<br>Matt<br>He goes and anoint Saul. And then he tells the children of Israel. Now, let me tell you what's going to happen now that you've set up a king. And the reason they wanted a king is because it says in the text they wanted to be like other nations. So they get a king and all of the surrounding, I'll call them Arab, although I know that's incorrect.  </p>
<p>00:11:50:28 - 00:12:16:25<br>Matt<br>The surrounding Arab world from the kings of Gath to the kings of Amman to the kings of Moab and to other surrounding nations, all come to war against the children of Israel who now have a king for themselves. And what the Lord tells Samuel to tell the children of Israel is tell them that the King will take your best men and use them for his wars, because that's the only way he's going to be able to keep his kingdom intact.  </p>
<p>00:12:17:21 - 00:12:39:09<br>Matt<br>And I reflected on that when I got to that part. The idea of taking the best men. And I thought any sane ruler will always, when it comes to military, might take the best of the best. The strong men, those who love and are willing to die for their country, those who are willing to put their neck on their line for the king, and in our case in this country.  </p>
<p>00:12:39:09 - 00:12:59:23<br>Matt<br>Back to some of what we've been talking about. It's not for an administration, as K.J. just said, in one of our stupid press conferences where she wasn't sure what to call the the the dead service members. She wasn't even sure how to refer to these these men and women in uniform. It's not OBE obeisance to an administration in this country.  </p>
<p>00:12:59:23 - 00:13:32:17<br>Matt<br>It's an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. That's the oath that our service members take. And so they learn. They're trained to take that seriously. And then they see politics come in that look like domestic enemies, and they see something called diversity equity and inclusion trainings. And here's the point. They think, why in the world would we destroy a merit based promotion system, merit based selection system, putting our best foot forward on the world stage in order to deter conflict and hopefully win conflict of deterrence fails?  </p>
<p>00:13:32:29 - 00:14:05:27<br>Matt<br>Why would we pursue racial quotas? Why would we pursue sex preference and gender affiliation quotas and make sure we diminish the number of white pilots from 85% to 67.5%. That was directly out of the mouth of the Air Force spokesperson. By the way, when service members of any race and any political demographic see that kind of rhetoric and see that kind of an ideological underpinning of policy decisions, it totally the spirit's them at totally wrecks the morale that undermines good order and discipline.  </p>
<p>00:14:05:27 - 00:14:29:10<br>Matt<br>And they think, why would I want to stick around in a military that might ask me to go downrange and have bombs dropped on my head? Why would I want to serve? And and a regime that doesn't want the best of us in those seats, but is interested more in race, identity politics. That's a that's an impasse. That's why I say at the beginning, there's no logic to the decision.  </p>
<p>00:14:29:10 - 00:14:51:22<br>Matt<br>It's cult like it's religious, like it's an ideological rooted policy decision. And it says that and it's Marxist, which is why I wrote my book. It's that we've got an oppressed class and we've got an oppressor class. And unfortunately, in cultural Marxism, it's not it's it's no longer the economic class stratification of Marx and Engels. 1848 Communist Manifesto.  </p>
<p>00:14:52:10 - 00:15:25:22<br>Matt<br>It is a race based oppressor versus oppressed system. And the most blatant lie of all that has been that has been continually resurrected by race hustlers and politicians is that, well, one group of people will call them white and another group of people will call them black. And now people of color are oppressors and oppressed. And so we need to change through policy, the race demographic of our services to make things more equitable and equitable is forced equality of outcomes.  </p>
<p>00:15:25:23 - 00:15:44:21<br>Matt<br>There's a whole lot to get into there, but I, I just couldn't help but reflect on the sanity of choosing the best for your military and the insanity and lunacy of selecting people based on any other selection process or reason or notion or model other than merit.  </p>
<p>00:15:46:10 - 00:16:13:21<br>Marty<br>And when you think about it, DIY as a construct is extremely racist in and of itself. Completely takes away the agency of individuals of any race, gender, sexual preference, whatever it may be, and says we need to make carve outs to put you individuals in this place. It really denigrates, again, the agency of the individual at the end of the day.  </p>
<p>00:16:14:05 - 00:16:35:06<br>Matt<br>Well, let me share another example of how it is detrimental to good order and discipline in the military workplace. And it's true for academia. It's true in an industry. Let's suppose that you are a person of color. I don't even like using these terms that have been foisted upon us. But let's say you're a black American or let's say you're a mexican female American.  </p>
<p>00:16:35:06 - 00:16:54:00<br>Matt<br>I'm picking these very deliberately because of my time in command in the Space Force and some of the interaction I had with my troops. And let's say that this DTI training is telling you that you've been held down by the white male because of systemic racism in society. So you're thinking about that. You're in uniform, you've shown up to do your work, but you've taken a knee because you have a down day.  </p>
<p>00:16:55:11 - 00:17:15:27<br>Matt<br>And the secretary of Defense has directed all service members to consider the ways in which we can heal ourselves of our systemic racist problems. So you've got a black male, you've got a mexican female. They've done quite well in their military career up to this point in time. They've promoted, they've been rewarded, they've been awarded, they've been promoted.  </p>
<p>00:17:15:27 - 00:17:34:09<br>Matt<br>They've been selected for various programs, officers, jobs because they've performed well. And now we start to establish quotas or hint that there are racial goals. They call them goals because they know that they can get in trouble legally when they establish racial quotas. It's in violation of Civil Rights Act. It's in violation of other law that we have.  </p>
<p>00:17:34:27 - 00:17:53:29<br>Matt<br>And so they don't like to use the term quota. And that's one of the things that came up in my recent congressional hearing. So you've got these people that say, hey, like up until now, I think that it wasn't because of my race or the way that I look or my gender or my sexual preference that I've been selected for this job or that I've been promoted to this rank.  </p>
<p>00:17:53:29 - 00:18:28:03<br>Matt<br>But moving forward, I'm not sure anymore if it's going to be based on my performance or based on my ethnicity. Think about how deleterious that is to the military workplace, and I'll give you one more example that's shorter. If you have a I'm using race now, just because this is it's such a prevalent object of relevance anymore in our current ongoing dialog, it never really mattered before 2020, as far as I was concerned in the military.  </p>
<p>00:18:28:04 - 00:18:51:25<br>Matt<br>Like we didn't talk about race, we just didn't talk. I knew personally a black couple, man and wife who were being subjected to Lloyd Austin's Diversity equity and inclusion trainings in my unit, and I tried to safeguard people from my unit, but there are base wide events. There are other trainings, guest speakers that are invited in and they can go to these things if they want to.  </p>
<p>00:18:51:26 - 00:19:24:09<br>Matt<br>You can't tell them, you know, stay here, lock the door and don't don't expose yourself to this stuff. And one member of that family bought in and started to view the workplace as an oppressive environment in which she was the object of the scrutiny of white people. And the other member, the husband said, I'm not sure I buy into this training, and I think it's been unhealthy for my wife to buy into this training.  </p>
<p>00:19:24:27 - 00:19:53:00<br>Matt<br>And so it set the husband and the wife at odds because they had ideology to argue over now. And and and and I looked at that as a commander. I thought, how do you solve. Now I've got marriage problems within my unit. It's not just about like distracting from the training mission that we're trying to accomplish. I got people who are having marital problems and all of that has ripples effect through the military workplace.  </p>
<p>00:19:53:00 - 00:20:11:02<br>Matt<br>So you get feedback and you say, Hey, this is hurting morale that's dividing people in this area. What are we supposed to do about it? And it's like, well, I mean, we are the leaders, after all. We should be able to do something about it. No, but we're just following orders. You know, we're taking orders from the secretary of defense and from the Biden regime.  </p>
<p>00:20:11:03 - 00:20:15:12<br>Matt<br>Well, so you have to do something about it. People have to speak up.  </p>
<p>00:20:16:06 - 00:20:52:11<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And it seems like this this whole trend has happened rather quickly. You keep going up to 2020 and 2021, and it seems like it has had material effects on the military, the quality of the people who are enlisted, and even more so. I mentioned it earlier, but preventing people from signing up in the first place. And so how we use the word deleterious, how deleterious could this be to the quality of the United States military if things don't go back to the way they were rather quickly?  </p>
<p>00:20:53:03 - 00:21:28:19<br>Matt<br>Consider this equation. Not only did we have race identity politics show up in the uniformed services at that time, summer of 2020. I mean, the seeds had been planted long ago. We could trace through some of the history. I don't know that it's necessary, but, you know, I can point back to 2011, during the last Obama Biden administration in which there is a military leadership and diversity commission established in which they began to go through all of the regulations and D.O.D. instructions and redefine terms like diversity, equity and inclusion.  </p>
<p>00:21:28:19 - 00:21:50:23<br>Matt<br>So there are there are points in time you can certainly point to, but the seeds had to be sown through the soil over a long period of time so that at the right crisis or set of crises, they could begin to sprout and be be nurtured and and kind of take over the garden, these weeds that grow up.  </p>
<p>00:21:51:09 - 00:22:09:23<br>Matt<br>It's like, where did they all come from? All of a sudden? It's like, well, the seeds had to be planted a long time ago and the soil had to be prepared and broken up properly so that they could so that they could actually sprout. But you consider the equation. You had race identity politics in the form of diversity and inclusion trainings.  </p>
<p>00:22:10:15 - 00:22:37:11<br>Matt<br>You had mask mandates that were showing up not just across the entire globe, but I mean, not just in the military workplace, but across the entire globe. You had mask mandates, yet you had coerced shots, you had forced separation distance, social distancing that on some military bases like my own turned into an aggressive totalitarian regime, like don't go outside of your house on base without your mask, on your face.  </p>
<p>00:22:37:11 - 00:23:05:15<br>Matt<br>And if you're caught socializing with people, you're going to be in big trouble. So we had lonely families. We had all of those things underway in the lead up to a presidential election and in the aftermath of a presidential election. And now, as we approach another presidential election and people wonder the things that are happening from our border to the over, now we've got an overextension of military forces abroad.  </p>
<p>00:23:06:13 - 00:23:29:03<br>Matt<br>And so all of the things that took place three years ago and four years ago that led to terrible recruitment, terrible retention, which almost it's like, is it really by chance that all of this kind of compounded at once, or was it a deliberate weakening of the military strength of the United States and the economic strength of the United States and the social and cultural cohesion of the United States in the Western world, generally speaking?  </p>
<p>00:23:30:02 - 00:23:52:17<br>Matt<br>And however you want to answer that question, QUESTION consider the fact that it's hurt our readiness. The Heritage Foundation puts out annual reports about US military strength. It's called the index of U.S. military strength. And so the Air Force for the US military is rated as weak in this independent assessment last year and now we're very weak, I think is that Heritage just put out the new report.  </p>
<p>00:23:52:17 - 00:24:25:13<br>Matt<br>I've not yet read it, which means we're not capable of successfully waging conflict in in other in any major regional conflict in the world. And at the time that we're so weak, we can't even successfully wage a major regional conflict. We have multiple conflicts that we are starting to get involved in, in various regions around the globe that involve proxy wars with our great competitors, Russia and China and Middle Eastern foes in a conflict in Israel.  </p>
<p>00:24:26:21 - 00:25:01:26<br>Matt<br>I mean, if you couldn't tee up a better recipe for disaster for this country than to cripple us in our recruitment and readiness, to cripple us economically, to weaken us militarily, and then to overextend us on the world stage. I mean, I reflect on through Saturday's history of the Peloponnesian War and the downfall of the Athenians as they it with some tangible degree of hubris overextended themselves on the world stage, even while they have their own domestic conflict and strife.  </p>
<p>00:25:02:12 - 00:25:27:21<br>Matt<br>And I just I think, man, there's nothing new under the sun. We're teeing up a disaster for us and we're allowing millions of people to come into the country while we're doing that. There's a at least a two tiered justice system in which certain people go unpunished for terrible crimes and the most decent of citizens who are law abiding citizens like you and me, it's easy to hold us accountable for violating, violating law.  </p>
<p>00:25:28:09 - 00:25:49:03<br>Matt<br>And so it will continue to be us who are held accountable, that we continue to be us who pay taxes, whether or not those who are here illegally ever have to pay a dime. In fact, they're given taxpayer dollars. So forgive me for a moment because I've just kind of like all of a sudden there's this whole panorama that opens up to view as we start talking about all these problems that we face.  </p>
<p>00:25:49:03 - 00:26:06:12<br>Matt<br>I've been literally quite focused on the military problem specifically, but I'm very aware of the fact that it's one slice of the overarching pie of problems for the United States right now at this juncture in history. It's it's really serious problems we're facing.  </p>
<p>00:26:07:08 - 00:26:39:15<br>Marty<br>Now. You're mentioning history rhyming, and that's a subject we cover a lot here. Obviously, Bitcoin podcasts focus on economic and financial side of things, particularly the monetary situation and ancient Rome right before Rome fell, very similar problems overextended its military throughout the world and then at the same time was debasing the Roman denarius, replacing the gold with bank metal to the point where when they went to pay their military, they were looking at the coins that they were getting paid and they said, this isn't worth anything.  </p>
<p>00:26:39:28 - 00:27:05:03<br>Marty<br>We're done. And then you had the barbarians come and sack Rome. Not too too much longer. And we have a very similar situation playing here in the United States where, as you just explained, we've extended ourselves militarily across the world. We're getting involved in many different conflicts at the same time. I mean, on the heels of what's going on in Ukraine and Russia, where we've given them a lot of weapons that have been depleted.  </p>
<p>00:27:05:03 - 00:27:29:03<br>Marty<br>I mean, from reports I've read, you don't even have the weapons stockpiles that would be necessary to engage in some of these conflicts that some of the politicians that are in charge right now would like to lead us into. And it is very scary when you put all of that together. And then the social cohesion on top of the monetary and military situation, it does seem like a perfect storm.  </p>
<p>00:27:29:03 - 00:27:58:15<br>Matt<br>And it's it is yeah, it's a perfect storm. And it's like it would take a miracle to get us out of all of it. I mean, it's really and so you can understand why people are angry, justifiably so. You can understand why people are increasingly polarized and hate one another. And that's under that's understandable. It's frankly, it's the way countries fall apart.  </p>
<p>00:27:58:21 - 00:28:30:19<br>Matt<br>And I like that you brought up Rome. I'd be many of the problems we face today, and we've not touched upon some of them. I mean, there's the education system and there's other problems that we face. Many of the problems we face are reminiscent of failing empires from the past, as you suggested. I'm not quite sure I'd like someone to take up this challenge and help me out a little bit, but I like to study history.  </p>
<p>00:28:31:29 - 00:28:58:11<br>Matt<br>I don't I don't I don't recall ever having seen such a wanton destruction of one's own territorial integrity as we see in the last couple of years in this country, where you've literally got millions of people allowed to come in from every country on earth and to displace its current inhabitants, It's there's no there's no better word for it than well, there's a lot of good words for it, but it's wicked.  </p>
<p>00:28:59:15 - 00:29:35:26<br>Matt<br>Every country on earth that is a free, fairly legitimate regime. There are legitimate states. There's I don't know how many there are today, between 190 and 200 states in the international system, according to the United Nations. Every one of those states that's legitimate or is striving for legitimacy will go to war and be willing to die for and to kill over two things primarily their political sovereignty and their territorial integrity, meaning their borders.  </p>
<p>00:29:36:25 - 00:30:12:01<br>Matt<br>And both of those things are highly compromised in our country at this time. And one of them, the territorial integrity of perhaps both of them, seem to be deliberately voluntarily surrendered, which makes you wonder if it's even, you know, the United States that controls its its decision calculus and its and and the decision making apparatus. Rather. It may in fact, be the case, as many people suspect, that there are those who are interested in pursuing an entirely different global order that demands the crippling of the United States.  </p>
<p>00:30:12:27 - 00:30:38:28<br>Matt<br>If the United States ceases to have a sovereign, territorial border, and if it ceases to have political sovereignty, then it can be absorbed into a greater global community. And so it's likely to me it's all too likely to me that that's in fact, the case. But sometimes when when someone shouts like, oh, it's it's the global elite and they're tearing us down, they can't make the connection in their mind.  </p>
<p>00:30:39:09 - 00:30:57:28<br>Matt<br>A listener can hear that and say, You know, I think that's probably true, but I just don't know what that looks like and how that's unfolding, really. And I see all the problems swirling around me. Just know that there are those for a very long time and frankly, throughout all of human history who have always been interested in expanding their power and their influence and to get gain.  </p>
<p>00:30:57:28 - 00:31:23:03<br>Matt<br>And as they wield influence, they have to take out barriers to their expansion and to their dominance. And some of that evil impulse we've seen in the country for the past few years is only interested in destruction and tearing down the old order and the existing order. Oftentimes, the people that are so wantonly engaged in destruction, they happen to be the useful idiots of communism.  </p>
<p>00:31:23:28 - 00:31:49:19<br>Matt<br>They're they're just pawns. And those who are the actual planners, the strategists who are who are trying to pave the path for that future global government are happy to steamroll those useless souls the moment they have accomplished some purpose that those idiots are useful for, they they'll steamroll them all day. They'll put them up against the wall, kill them.  </p>
<p>00:31:50:12 - 00:32:04:25<br>Matt<br>And and I'm not exaggerating that one bit. They're useless to them after a certain point. They're only interested in their aims. And I think their aims will be frustrated, but it'll be really interesting, exciting and dreadful to see how all of this plays out over the next few years.  </p>
<p>00:32:05:26 - 00:32:11:08<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I mean, we had a great example of those pawns yesterday in France at the live throwing, trying to I.  </p>
<p>00:32:11:08 - 00:32:11:26<br>Matt<br>Didn't see that.  </p>
<p>00:32:12:18 - 00:32:18:18<br>Marty<br>There was another just stop oil protests where they threw paint on the Mona Lisa or the glass but all these.  </p>
<p>00:32:18:18 - 00:32:31:16<br>Matt<br>Beautiful pieces of art, they they want to go and tear it down and they're going to accomplish what you know, I guess they're they're trying to use their voice, but they're also wrecking things. And they're there's so many spirits abroad.  </p>
<p>00:32:32:18 - 00:32:55:22<br>Marty<br>That's the I mean, you said wicked earlier. And I do think good and evil exist. And evil is very pervasive throughout society right now. And as you mentioned, it has convinced many Pons to fight against their own self-interest. And propaganda is a big piece of this. I've been covering it a lot on my site. We call it climate hysteria versus climate realism.  </p>
<p>00:32:55:22 - 00:33:21:14<br>Marty<br>And the whole climate fear mongering, I think is one of the most potent that we have across the planet today. And it's just insane. Talking about we talked about military expansion making us weaker, the monetary situation making this week. But that's another key pillar, too, to the destruction of the stability of the Western world as a deconstruction of our reliable energy systems, which for the last two decades has been right.  </p>
<p>00:33:21:25 - 00:33:32:21<br>Marty<br>It's disgusting what has happened in Germany being the perfect case study. And we're trying to bring those energy policies here to the United States, which is just incredibly disheartening.  </p>
<p>00:33:33:10 - 00:34:03:18<br>Matt<br>Well, so I've got a question. It's rhetorical. I mean, it's for you and for the listener. We're mentioning all these things that are weakening. They have a tendency to destroy. They have a tendency to weaken. They have a tendency to undermine unity. They have a tendency be for failure or however you want to put it. What is it exactly that we're doing as a country right now that's making a stronger like the pick something you write?  </p>
<p>00:34:03:18 - 00:34:23:13<br>Matt<br>And so, like if I want to be honest about it, I could sit here all day long and think, What is it that we're doing as a country to make us stronger? And every thing that comes to mind where I think, okay, there's groups of people trying to do X, Y or Z, I can rebut them within within a few seconds.  </p>
<p>00:34:23:13 - 00:34:45:13<br>Matt<br>And I just think now that's all being undone. That's a terrible place to be because as you go back to how empires thrive, you need to you need to embrace principles that make you last as a and you need to militarily, at least from a security perspective, you need to you need you need to prepare for conflict in ways that make your country strong.  </p>
<p>00:34:45:14 - 00:35:16:15<br>Matt<br>That and that there's an international relations scholar that I very much I like his thinking overall. I'm not sure I like his domestic world view, like public policy world view. It doesn't matter. He's an international relations scholar, John Mearsheimer, and he wrote a book called The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. For those who are listening that appreciate international relations, terms or models, he's he's an offensive realist.  </p>
<p>00:35:18:11 - 00:35:50:20<br>Matt<br>But the point I wanted to make about Mearsheimer, what I learned from Mearsheimer and I think it's largely true the way in an international system that states measure power is by a state's economic strength and its military might. Those two things together determine how strong a country is and at least also drive perceptions in the international community of how strong that country is.  </p>
<p>00:35:52:06 - 00:36:12:12<br>Matt<br>When a country forfeits its economic might, it doesn't. It almost doesn't matter how strong its military is for very long because it's going to go out the window. Pretty soon you'll stop being able to pay, you'll stop being able to pay for weapons and and procure innovative new technologies, for example. That's just one example of how this works.  </p>
<p>00:36:12:12 - 00:36:48:23<br>Matt<br>But both of those things have to be strong and flourishing. You need a strong economy, you need a strong military. And frankly, you can add to that, although it's not a part of the international relations paradigm, necessarily not at least in the realist model, you need a people that have some sense, have some sense of patriotism or nationalism that says internally in the soul of the country, culturally, socially, that they are willing, they love their country, and they're willing to go lay down their lives and die for their country because they believe in what their country is pursuing.  </p>
<p>00:36:49:14 - 00:37:12:10<br>Matt<br>We have many good, patriotic, nationalistic in every positive sense of those terms, by the way, they've been demonized, too. There's a constant changing of language, but those are powerful forces. We have very patriotic men and women in this country who love their country and who want who are willing to die for it. But they watch what's happening on the world stage right now.  </p>
<p>00:37:12:10 - 00:37:47:21<br>Matt<br>And they say, I'm not willing to die for that. What am I trying to secure exactly? If I if I sign up today and swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution, am I going to defend the Constitution or am I as that that What's her name? JP jumper, that stupid spokes person. She's an idiot. She really she's she's about as terrible as it gets as she says she she wanted to thank the the three people who those folks that wear the uniform.  </p>
<p>00:37:47:24 - 00:37:57:28<br>Matt<br>You can go watch the video just a couple of days ago. It's totally offensive who who died serving this administration. That's utter bullshit. People don't.  </p>
<p>00:37:58:07 - 00:37:58:23<br>Marty<br>Slip.  </p>
<p>00:37:59:06 - 00:38:19:14<br>Matt<br>That's like you don't. You don't. Yeah, and that's exactly. That's right. That's what it was. She's like, Yeah, they died serving the administration. That's true. But that's not why young men and women sign up to serve in the military. They're not interested in serving in administration. And because this administration, unfortunately, views it that way, it's like, hey, you're faithful to the administration.  </p>
<p>00:38:20:12 - 00:38:39:09<br>Matt<br>There are many people on both sides of the political aisle that have no interest in in serving their country. It's like, yeah, I'll serve this administration, but when the next one comes in, I'm not I'm not sure I'll be interested in serving the interests of the administration. Military men and women can think that way, ideally, and I know it doesn't always work this way anymore.  </p>
<p>00:38:39:19 - 00:39:17:13<br>Matt<br>Ideally, any administration, regardless of their political party, would come in adamantly interested in preserving political sovereignty and territorial integrity, believing in the Constitution and our values as a country, believing in a national identity. And if you have presidents and administrations come in with those with with the apparent interest in preserving our values as a country, whatever your political makeup, whatever your religious worldview, then you have willing citizens who can, in an all volunteer force, sign up to die for their country.  </p>
<p>00:39:18:11 - 00:39:36:13<br>Matt<br>The moment people start sniffing you out and saying like, I don't even think you're interested in preserving our border, I don't even think we're not even preserving our border or political sovereignty. And we're demonizing one side or the other of the political aisle. And you're going to send me to go die in Syria? Like for who? Exactly what?  </p>
<p>00:39:36:17 - 00:39:57:27<br>Matt<br>What are we preserving? So and we get all of this and I'm thinking out loud, but you know, your listener gets this because the comment because the average American has common sense. And if you're disgusted by what you're seeing for various reasons, think about if you were 18 or 19 and and someone said, we'd like you to serve in an all volunteer force and maybe go die for your country.  </p>
<p>00:39:57:27 - 00:40:23:21<br>Matt<br>And it's like the question immediately is, I'm not sure I'm willing to do that. Die for what exactly? What are we preserving here? So with that's a big problem to solve. And even if we solved that today, somehow in an amazing way, we solved it today. The consequences of our decisions for the past several years will last for many years, and it takes years to recover from the buffoonery that we've been watching for the past several years.  </p>
<p>00:40:23:21 - 00:40:27:22<br>Matt<br>So that's why people like me are very hard on the decisions that we're making.  </p>
<p>00:40:30:02 - 00:40:50:20<br>Marty<br>And you mentioned it twice now. It would take a miracle to solve this problem for being pragmatic, recognizing that the problem exist. We do need a solution. The solution may take years to implement. What, in your mind are the first steps that we could take as a country to begin mending this gaping hole that we have in the culture of our military?  </p>
<p>00:40:51:19 - 00:40:53:14<br>Matt<br>Are you asking what are the first steps?  </p>
<p>00:40:53:28 - 00:40:54:11<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:40:54:25 - 00:41:23:15<br>Matt<br>Okay. Boy, that's we've gone down the hole of cynicism and sarcasm and not some not sarcasm, but cynicism. Negativity. And it's you have to you have to be very real. Right. All right. So so let me come out of that as best I can, because it's equally as true to assert that if our country is to survive, we need good men and women who love their country serving in uniform.  </p>
<p>00:41:24:02 - 00:41:45:07<br>Matt<br>As it is to say that we're facing all these problems, it's equally as true to say that. So the problem then becomes how do you get good men and women to serve in uniform? And again, admittedly, I'm talking about the military problem that we're facing. There's all these other problems that need to be solved. So an can make a big difference.  </p>
<p>00:41:45:07 - 00:42:11:28<br>Matt<br>And so let's assume for a moment that, you know, let's assume for a moment that you get a better administration in place and you've got a president that's able to solve problems, then you've got part of the problem solved that's that by executive fiat through executive order, some of the idiot policies that are currently in place that are wrecking good order and discipline can be removed on day one, just as has happened.  </p>
<p>00:42:12:12 - 00:42:43:27<br>Matt<br>And the change from the Trump administration to the Biden administration, where on day one, President Biden and on day one, Joe Biden issued a number of executive orders, and one of those was to advance equity in the military, workplace and in the federal agencies and DNI trainings came back on steroids and have been wrecking house ever since. And drag shows and pride activism and all this stuff.  </p>
<p>00:42:43:27 - 00:43:08:27<br>Matt<br>It's like, go do all of that in the civilian world. Stop tampering around with the military apparatus and let people focus on their mission in the workplace. So on day one, that's one change that can happen. You can have an executive commander in chief, executive branch commander in chief come in and change policy that could incentivize people to return to the military in hopes that things will turn around.  </p>
<p>00:43:08:29 - 00:43:37:29<br>Matt<br>So I admit that's possible. Instead of congressmen vying for another term in office and not solving the problems bipartisanly that we need solved in this country, instead preserving the problems so that they can all continue to point fingers across the political aisle and and and and be adamant with their voter base that they are the ones to solve those problems during their next term in office.  </p>
<p>00:43:38:16 - 00:43:55:04<br>Matt<br>If we could actually come together in a bipartisan way and solve problems because we genuinely loved and cared for our country, that would be a way that you incentivize men and women to come and sign up to serve in their military, potentially die for their country. But why would you die for a country you're not sure is going to be around in ten years?  </p>
<p>00:43:55:13 - 00:44:19:27<br>Matt<br>I'd rather live and take care of my family. So the other thing is, and this is not specifically related to the military, but it can pertain to those who have ambitions to serve in the military. People can get you can't always solve the problems at the federal level. There's a giant swamp of people who are entrenched there that aren't going anywhere.  </p>
<p>00:44:20:11 - 00:44:48:06<br>Matt<br>And it almost hasn't mattered what administration came into power. Good people in their states and in their cities can get involved in local government. They can get involved and in school boards. They can get involved in grassroots roots movements that seek to get victories. And unfortunately for decent people who like the privacy of their own lives, it means becoming slightly more activist than they've ever been in their lives.  </p>
<p>00:44:48:06 - 00:45:20:29<br>Matt<br>You can do that in as decent a way as you know how in as noble a way as you know how with while keeping your integrity intact and not becoming slimy as a human being and turning into a monster, you can get involved at the local level and make some impact in your community. And that's a great way to create a sphere of influence, of decency and integrity and law abiding, law abiding citizens and lawfulness where you live despite hell that's being unleashed in our country by by the by any administration.  </p>
<p>00:45:22:04 - 00:46:01:25<br>Matt<br>It might not save your country, but it might make your local more livable and more sane. Don't let bullies steamroll the majority of people in your area into adopting values and the public education system that are totally anathema to the vast majority of parents, for example. And people are starting to do that. And I think it's far more likely that in our local communities, our families, our churches, our local government, where we're able to have impact for good than it is for some citizen in small town Nebraska to rise up and make a difference at the federal level.  </p>
<p>00:46:04:12 - 00:46:32:19<br>Matt<br>You see these truckers, you see you see tractors all over social media, see truckers, you see farmers, you see cowboys, you see the patriots there, the alleged MAGA alt riders there. They're coming from everywhere, all over the country to support what appears to be Texas standing against the federal government and trying to secure the border. The sane person says, What the hell is Texas been doing the last several years?  </p>
<p>00:46:32:20 - 00:47:15:03<br>Matt<br>Like, why now? You know, but but Governor Abbott has issued some strong statements and people are showing up because they genuinely want to do something. And it's like we'll get involved in that. But beware, because you've got a federal government that's weaponized against you at the moment and these gun toting Americans that want to show up and a show of force at the Texas border and do some good just might find themselves the object of a conspiracy, see to or a false flag that that makes it look like, hey, we've got a bunch of we've got a bunch of patriot extremists who have shown up causing trouble and now now you're in a shooting match  </p>
<p>00:47:15:03 - 00:47:34:08<br>Matt<br>and that that's not going to end well either. So it's a very it's a precarious time. Everyone's aware of that. Get involved locally. And and if you're here's another thing. Thanks for giving me a free mike, by the way, to just kind of ramble. I'll try and be more pointed and direct in what time we've got remaining.  </p>
<p>00:47:34:18 - 00:47:35:13<br>Marty<br>No, this is awesome.  </p>
<p>00:47:35:27 - 00:48:03:27<br>Matt<br>If you're a man or a woman in uniform, you need to speak. Speak up and and and not be afraid of punishment. Because if you are not acting illegally or unethically or immorally, funny enough, immoral shows up. We're doing drag shows and people are dressing up as dogs and dancing around. And it's like, that isn't immoral. What is the morality anymore?  </p>
<p>00:48:03:27 - 00:48:24:26<br>Matt<br>So let's say let me eliminate that one. If you're not doing something unethical or illegal, then you should feel free to use your voice to say, I disagree with what I'm hearing. I disagree with what I'm seeing, and I have a different set of values and you're offending me in this training is offensive to me. This policy is offensive to me.  </p>
<p>00:48:25:01 - 00:48:44:15<br>Matt<br>This is me not trying to be partizan as a service member. This is me saying I have a voice. I'm going to use it and and start to stand up because there are literally thousands of people all across the bases that are near you that feel the same way that you do. But they're afraid to speak because they've been trained that they're supposed to be yes men.  </p>
<p>00:48:44:15 - 00:49:08:28<br>Matt<br>They're trained that they need to be loyal to senior leaders and and to to a military chain of command. And you need to respect all of that. And that's important for good order and discipline. But don't let your services be steamrolled by political activists. And I don't care if you're a Democrat or Republican or libertarian, doesn't matter. Speak up and say, hey, this is offensive.  </p>
<p>00:49:09:08 - 00:49:24:14<br>Matt<br>I'm not a racist, so stop calling me one. This guy doesn't want to be treated like an object because of his race. So knock it off. Like we're not interested in this training, so shut the hell up. We're walking out of here. Kind of a thing Like you have to be able to stand up. And if you get paperwork, you get punished.  </p>
<p>00:49:24:14 - 00:49:36:05<br>Matt<br>Like, live. Live with it. Suck. You know, suck it up. That's a small sacrifice to make to try and speak to your principles and stand on your values and to try and preserve the integrity of the United States military.  </p>
<p>00:49:38:03 - 00:50:08:15<br>Marty<br>Now you're echoing something that we say a lot on this show is that the silent majority of people who just want to make a good life for their family do good work, be productive throughout society and live a comfortable life, need to have confidence instilled in them to speak up against the madness, whether it's in the military, with the monetary system, in the in the energy sector, with the woke agenda that's being pushed throughout the schooling system.  </p>
<p>00:50:09:12 - 00:50:16:26<br>Marty<br>I truly believe deep down that most people do not want any of this and are just too afraid and self-censor.  </p>
<p>00:50:17:06 - 00:50:50:11<br>Matt<br>And I think you're right. There's a lot of decent people in every country on planet Earth. They're just they just want to be left alone by their governments. They to raise their kids, to be decent humans. And they see all this evil and and ignorance and mean spiritedness and they're like, And so when you want to speak your values and here's some advice for you, remember that you're not the bad guy like you're just speaking, You're using your voice in a country that above all has valued free speech throughout its history.  </p>
<p>00:50:50:11 - 00:51:08:09<br>Matt<br>It's like, use your voice, speak up, Take some spears from people saying, Oh my gosh, you're mean. Are you really that bigoted? Are you really that racist? Like, No, I'm none of those things, but I have values and I've wanted to be a decent human my whole life. And you're starting to bully me and I won't accept it.  </p>
<p>00:51:08:09 - 00:51:29:28<br>Matt<br>So it's like, back up, get the hell out of my bubble and and stop bullying the majority of people here that feel like I do, like I'm just. I just want to be free of tyranny. And you're starting to play the role of the tyrant. So get out of my space, you know, and and say that to your supervisor in the military and say like, Hey, respectfully, get out of this space of my values.  </p>
<p>00:51:30:11 - 00:51:48:15<br>Matt<br>I'm here to do a mission for the United States military, and you're changing directions for some reason. So stop being a political person. With all due respect, sir, ma'am, or they or juror or whatever you go by, step out of my space. Either teach me how to do my mission or I've got no respect for you anymore. And you can have someone working under you.  </p>
<p>00:51:48:15 - 00:51:57:14<br>Matt<br>In fact, all of my all of my buddies here, we're we're not going to have respect for you. We'll follow your orders that are legal. But you've lost all of our respect because you're a political animal.  </p>
<p>00:51:59:06 - 00:52:31:29<br>Marty<br>If enough people do that, I think we can change things rather quickly. Again, there's something good psychology weekly inverse humans that they self-censor due to fear of retribution and retaliation. And it is weird and I think where we stand today in 2024, it is more important than ever that people speak up. I mean, this is a show heavily focused on Bitcoin and, you know, like we focus on Bitcoin because we believe the root of a lot of the strife that we're feeling today is the money.  </p>
<p>00:52:31:29 - 00:53:00:01<br>Marty<br>When you corrupt the money, you can print it out of nothing and throw it at DEA initiatives and right woke university systems and big pharma studies. It really corrupts the incentives of the economy overall and really corrupts opportunity cost. At the end of the day, you can just print money and throw it at these useless, unproductive activities. And I do think people are feeling it, particularly on the money side with inflation, people are feeling inflation.  </p>
<p>00:53:00:01 - 00:53:15:10<br>Marty<br>They see it week in and week out at the grocery store and no matter how many times John Pare, Pierre tells you that that inflation has been solved, it's very obvious to people that it has not. People need to speak up against all of this.  </p>
<p>00:53:15:25 - 00:53:39:03<br>Matt<br>The economy is stronger than ever. And and and God bless our heroes who wear that uniform of this administration. Oh, she wouldn't say God bless. But, you know, you bring up such a good point about how money incentivizes a lot of this industry that DIY facilitators and and public speakers are making a lot better money than you and I are.  </p>
<p>00:53:39:26 - 00:54:02:06<br>Matt<br>And it's it's quite lucrative. And you've got there's a reason you pay in theory there's a reason you pay most of your teachers low salary. You don't want them to be incentivized by the wrong thing. I'm not I'm not saying I don't advocate for like improving pay for teachers, too, but like, it's like we want good teachers, not people incentivized by by filthy lucre.  </p>
<p>00:54:02:18 - 00:54:21:26<br>Matt<br>We don't pay our police forces very well. We don't pay an all voluntary force very well because it's like we want you to choose to swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution against its enemies and to come in not for the purposes of getting wealthy, but because we'll provide sufficient for your needs while you do something.  </p>
<p>00:54:21:27 - 00:54:51:04<br>Matt<br>Out of the motivation of honor and integrity duty to country service before self. And and that's worked really well while you had nation that was guided by some kind of a moral compass where you had teachers who were authentically interested in teaching something for for little or nothing when you had police forces who are interested in law and order and we had military forces who believed in the might, the military might of the United States and of its and of the American ideal.  </p>
<p>00:54:51:28 - 00:55:21:28<br>Matt<br>And when you lose the moral compass and when this country ceases to look and feel like America, you start to pay all of the wrong people. And and sickos and sycophants and narcissists come in to positions in all of those places. And the ones that toe the party line end up being rewarded with social credits or money. Yeah, a lot of change needs to take place if we're going to if we're if we're going to.  </p>
<p>00:55:24:06 - 00:55:30:03<br>Matt<br>Hmm. I always try and be honest. Well, if we're going to reverse course, then a lot of change needs to take place.  </p>
<p>00:55:31:06 - 00:55:54:09<br>Marty<br>I agree. And luckily we have individuals like yourself out there fighting the good fight. I know we only have 2 minutes left here, so I want to again, thank you for everything you're doing. I think it's extremely important. We need more voices like yours out there incentivizing and instilling confidence in people and letting them know, like, Hey, you're not alone here.  </p>
<p>00:55:54:22 - 00:56:01:25<br>Marty<br>There's many others who think everything that's going on right now is quite crazy. And if you don't like it, you should speak up against it.  </p>
<p>00:56:04:02 - 00:56:33:22<br>Matt<br>Yeah. Sometimes people are afraid to speak solely because they're not sure how to defend or how to defend their worldview or to articulate it. And so one of the pieces of advice I give to people is, next time you're stumped in a conversation with someone and you're not sure how you should have responded, you better think about it then and know that next time you'll never be stumped again by that problem and and just come up with two or three talking points and then be willing to be humble and ask other people questions about their worldview.  </p>
<p>00:56:33:22 - 00:56:52:07<br>Matt<br>And a lot of the lunacy that you see parading around us is not logical, it's not defendable. And they can't articulate their worldview. They've got talking points that they've memorized. And so like, learn about your values, learn how to articulate them. And sometimes don't be afraid to say I disagree, even if you're not sure how to articulate your worldview.  </p>
<p>00:56:52:07 - 00:56:55:23<br>Matt<br>And that's kind of the beginning place for exercising your free speech.  </p>
<p>00:56:56:10 - 00:57:02:22<br>Marty<br>Yeah, great advice, Matt. Thank you for joining us today. I thoroughly enjoyed this conversation.  </p>
<p>00:57:03:12 - 00:57:03:28<br>Matt<br>Thank you.  </p>
<p>00:57:04:22 - 00:57:07:01<br>Marty<br>All right. That's all we got today. Peace and love for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[Scrib]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/how-dei-is-weakening-the-military/">Read original post</a></p>
<h2>Key Takeaways</h2>
<h3><strong>The Problem of DEI in the Military:</strong></h3>
<ul>
<li>The podcast features Lt. Col. Matt Lohmeier, who addresses the issue of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the military.</li>
<li>Lohmeier noticed ideological shifts within the military post-George Floyd's death that aligned with the social unrest seen across the country.</li>
<li>The military began to focus on DEI initiatives after the reversal of Trump's executive order banning critical race theory by President Biden.</li>
<li>DEI initiatives have led to division and a decrease in morale, impacting recruitment and retention within the military.</li>
<li>Lohmeier argues that promoting based on race, gender, or sexual preference, instead of merit, undermines the military's effectiveness.</li>
<li>He suggests that DEI, as it currently stands, is fundamentally racist and diminishes individual agency.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The Need for Strong Military Principles:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The military's purpose is to fight and win wars; politicizing the military with DEI initiatives corrupts its core mission.</li>
<li>A strong military requires a merit-based system free from political agendas.</li>
<li>Lohmeier emphasizes the importance of a strong economy and military might in determining a country's power.</li>
<li>The conversation also touches on the broader issues facing the United States, such as border security, political sovereignty, and the potential overextension of military forces.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Potential Solutions and Actions:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Changes at the administration level could reverse damaging policies.</li>
<li>Grassroots involvement in local government and school boards can protect communities' values.</li>
<li>Speaking up within the military against politicization and advocating for a return to mission-focused values is crucial.</li>
<li>Encourages the silent majority to use their voices against the current cultural and political madness.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Links</h2>
<p>Follow Matt on <a href="https://twitter.com/matthewlohmeier?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>Check out <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Irresistible-Revolution-Marxisms-Conquest-Unmaking/dp/1737067323/ref=asc_df_1737067323/?tag=hyprod-20&amp;linkCode=df0&amp;hvadid=334204344421&amp;hvpos=&amp;hvnetw=g&amp;hvrand=15841849355427727081&amp;hvpone=&amp;hvptwo=&amp;hvqmt=&amp;hvdev=c&amp;hvdvcmdl=&amp;hvlocint=&amp;hvlocphy=9028279&amp;hvtargid=pla-1276437226252&amp;psc=1&amp;mcid=f5e282d9f8f03d1ea779aea77bfb2617&amp;gclid=CjwKCAiA_OetBhAtEiwAPTeQZ7hHrhNDyhyXNcRU8hqDE3dDMnUS-1i5rWeScten_yKOHtDEM-2RnxoCo8oQAvD_BwE&amp;ref=tftc.io"><em>Irresistible Revolution: Marxism’s Goal of Conquest &amp; the Unmaking of the American Military</em></a></p>
<h2>Sponsors</h2>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h1>Best Quotes</h1>
<ol>
<li>"The purpose of the United States military is to fight and win our nation’s wars."</li>
<li>"We want a relatively apolitical military. And so when you have an entire industry that is steeped in politics, and in this case, race identity politics, and now every other agenda under the sun... you run into the division that you’re talking about."</li>
<li>"There's no logic behind the cult-like ideologically driven policy implementation of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives."</li>
<li>"DEI as a construct is extremely racist in and of itself. It completely takes away the agency of individuals... and says we need to make carve-outs to put you individuals in this place."</li>
<li>"If you're not doing something unethical or illegal, then you should feel free to use your voice to say, I disagree with what I'm hearing, I disagree with what I'm seeing, and I have a different set of values, and you're offending me."</li>
</ol>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>This rip with Lt. Col. Matt Lohmeier highlights critical concerns regarding DEI initiatives in the U.S. military and their potential to weaken the military's core mission. Lohmeier's insights present a nuanced perspective on the importance of maintaining a merit-based, apolitical military structure to ensure readiness and effectiveness. The conversation also extends to the broader societal and political challenges facing the United States, suggesting that a miracle might be needed to reverse the current trajectory. However, Lohmeier offers practical advice for individuals who wish to enact change, emphasizing the power of local involvement and the necessity for the silent majority to find their voice. The discussion ultimately serves as a call to action for those concerned about the direction of the military and the country, to stand up for their values and work toward solutions that preserve the strength and integrity of the United States.</p>
<h2>Timestamps</h2>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>6:45 - Politics dividing the military<br>15:57 - Military of the best<br>22:28 - DEI harms those it “protects”<br>27:00 - US weakening is rapid and likely intentional<br>40:15 - What’s making us stronger?<br>47:12 - First steps to mending<br>54:18 - Call to the silent majority<br>50:03 - Money and incentives<br>1:02:15 - Define your values</p>
<p><strong>Transcript</strong></p>
<p>00:00:00:23 - 00:00:01:03<br>Matt<br>Great.  </p>
<p>00:00:03:04 - 00:00:05:25<br>Marty<br>Lieutenant Colonel Matt Longmire, thank you for joining the show.  </p>
<p>00:00:06:14 - 00:00:07:24<br>Matt<br>Sure. Happy to be here.  </p>
<p>00:00:08:18 - 00:00:32:17<br>Marty<br>Well, I saw you were on a subcommittee meeting for national security a couple of weeks ago explaining the problems that you've recognized as it pertains to the military and the encroachment of the I throughout the military. You wrote a book about this subject. It was irresistible Revolution, Marxism, Goal of Conquest and the Unmet Unmaking of the American military.  </p>
<p>00:00:32:18 - 00:01:06:03<br>Marty<br>So this is a problem you highlighted years ago. Began writing about sort of best seller on the subject. And thankfully, you were at the subcommittee meeting a couple of weeks ago to highlight this problem because it seems like it is a pretty massive problem when you look at recruitment rates and just the as an American citizen is not in the military outside looking in at everything that's been done over the last few years as it pertains to D-I quotas and just what seem like nonsensical decisions that have been made.  </p>
<p>00:01:06:04 - 00:01:17:29<br>Marty<br>It seems a bit crazy as an insider. Lieutenant Colonel was retired from Space Force that has identified this problem. When did you first recognize this problem and what exactly is the problem in your mind?  </p>
<p>00:01:18:22 - 00:01:45:16<br>Matt<br>Right. Well, you can spend an hour on a podcast talking about that, or you can spend four months writing a book about it and trying to inform people It's let me try and be succinct. And you think I get better at this, having spoken about it for like hundreds of hours and each new day brings the challenge of making sure I engage my brain properly to try and do the topic justice.  </p>
<p>00:01:45:17 - 00:02:12:15<br>Matt<br>So I it's probably helpful to say that I had spent 15 years on active duty in uniform before really recognizing that there was this particular problem that we're so readily and easily identifying as diversity, equity and inclusion, industry and training. Today, it's getting a lot of attention on social media primarily, and even in the mainstream media a little bit.  </p>
<p>00:02:12:15 - 00:03:05:05<br>Matt<br>Occasionally, if it's expedient or politically expedient, let's say. But it was to answer your question directly, it was in the summer of 2021, right after George Floyd's death that I noticed the same spiritual, energetic, ideological impulse that was tearing down the country in one sense through the smashing of windows and toppling of or the toppling of statues, the burning and flipping of police cars that people were seeing and the news being reported on in that late spring and summer time of 2020 in which the death of a black man was used as a pretext by left wing activists and anarchists to create strife, division, contention throughout the country.  </p>
<p>00:03:05:05 - 00:03:38:19<br>Matt<br>That same spirit and energy was very apparently manifest in the United States military all throughout every branch of the military in the uniformed services. And apparently also and I didn't know it at the time, throughout the federal agencies and in the fall of that year, President Trump issued an executive order banning critical race theory training, spanning anti-American trainings and the uniformed services and all federal agencies banning sex and race scapegoating as the way it was termed in his executive order.  </p>
<p>00:03:38:20 - 00:04:01:07<br>Matt<br>And that came at a time that provided great relief to the men and women in uniform because we had started to notice that our morale was being eroded and people were being divided about political talking points, ideological talking points. And so, by and large, that executive order helped kind of calm things in the fall of 2020 leading up to the election.  </p>
<p>00:04:01:24 - 00:04:26:13<br>Matt<br>And that was reversed by policy, by executive fiat on January 20th of 2021 by Joe Biden. So that's probably a good starting place. There's a thousand things that could be said about any number of those points that I've made. So if you want to dive into any of those specific points, we can or or I'll continue to elaborate.  </p>
<p>00:04:27:04 - 00:04:54:05<br>Marty<br>Well, I think before we dive into the specific points I get back to first principles is viewing the military and what it's trying to achieve and who it's trying to bring together. You would imagine that armed forces, the individuals that make up the military, come from both sides of the political spectrum. And they they agree that they want to protect the country and the ideals that it was founded on.  </p>
<p>00:04:54:05 - 00:05:19:15<br>Marty<br>And the rights that it's trying to protect and sort of have this bipartisan agreement by servicemen and women to to protect that. And the thought of this very hyper political ized movement eating into that, it seems like it's corrupting something that's very pure and very important to achieve the goals that the military sets out to achieve.  </p>
<p>00:05:20:02 - 00:05:43:05<br>Matt<br>Great points, and I'll elaborate on that just a little bit. I want to say a few things that are rather definitive. The purpose of the United States military is to fight and win our nation's wars. That's that's why states have militaries. And when I say states, I'm speaking of states in the international political sense, international relations speak sense.  </p>
<p>00:05:45:11 - 00:06:10:20<br>Matt<br>We need to be able to fight and win our nations wars. We hope through policy and through a strong military and a strong economy to deter violent conflict. And if deterrence fails, then you have a strong military to fight and win nations wars. They have military objectives that are employed, that are achieved in pursuit of certain political aims.  </p>
<p>00:06:11:13 - 00:06:41:07<br>Matt<br>So I want to go back to what you said about a kind of bipartisan contract between service members to do that job that they have. You can look at it that way in one sense, although there are many men and women in uniform who would rather be apolitical. And in fact, the obligation of those that serve in uniform is that in their day to day work life in the military workplace, they remain relatively apolitical.  </p>
<p>00:06:41:07 - 00:07:11:24<br>Matt<br>And I say relatively compared to the American people who are welcome to argue and bicker and complain and and fight with one another over policy and political ideas and agendas. And over which candidates are the best to be in office. They're welcome to those views as service members individually and in their private life. But what they are legally obligated to do is to avoid overt politics in the military workplace, because, as you've heard before, religion and politics divide.  </p>
<p>00:07:11:24 - 00:07:37:16<br>Matt<br>And so we don't talk about them at the dinner table except in the best of company. And so that's good advice for the men and women in uniform as well. We want a relatively apolitical military. And so when you have an entire industry that is steeped in politics and in this case race, identity politics and now every other agenda under the sun, identity politics that have various letters and things attached to their identities and their political agendas.  </p>
<p>00:07:38:25 - 00:08:18:05<br>Matt<br>In fact, I was just reading something about queer theory and the queer agenda yesterday. It was an academic writing. It wasn't a screed by any means or by any stretch of the imagination. And the queer theorists themselves define and pursue their agenda, which they define as against normativity, against the normal cultural, social bearing that any society has. The queer agenda is to disrupt and and agitate against what is considered normal and hence the term queer.  </p>
<p>00:08:18:06 - 00:08:33:16<br>Matt<br>It's different, it's odd. It's, you know, it always meant something else other than what we typically think of in our mind today. So my my point in bringing all of that up is you want the man and woman in uniform to not get caught up in all of that and simply be focused on being a good aircraft mechanic.  </p>
<p>00:08:33:25 - 00:09:01:05<br>Matt<br>Simply be focused on being a good space operator and provide GPS to troops downrange and to American citizens and our allies. You want people to fly their planes and not worry about this. So when you have an overtly political administration, every administration is political. When you have an an administration overtly politicized through policy, the military workplace, then you run into the division that you're talking about that impacts recruitment.  </p>
<p>00:09:01:07 - 00:09:12:04<br>Matt<br>It impacts our troops willingness to be retained retention and to continue serving and and a host of other problems we'll probably get into.  </p>
<p>00:09:12:27 - 00:09:28:23<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So what is the justification for these policies from the the politicians who've enacted them and you mentioned earlier that it was dicta, it wasn't really voted on, didn't go through Congress and go through.  </p>
<p>00:09:28:24 - 00:09:45:04<br>Matt<br>No, no, no. Yeah, it wasn't through Congress. Yeah, it was. It was a presidential edict. It was a it was it's an executive order. I mean, the executive branch has this authority to issue executive orders. Unfortunately, you can do a lot of damage and you can do a lot of good with that.  </p>
<p>00:09:49:12 - 00:10:19:19<br>Matt<br>I don't like the answer I'm about to give. Maybe because it's it might seem like a non-answer, but it's not. There is no logic, at least decent logic. There's no logic behind the cultlike ideological ideologically driven policy implementation of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. And I want to I want to give you an example just keeps coming back to my mind.  </p>
<p>00:10:19:19 - 00:10:50:10<br>Matt<br>And I almost said it right when we began. If you'll stick with me for just a minute on this, it'll seem like a tangent at first, but I just finished reading the book of First Samuel, and in that record you've got a body of people who are interested in their national identity. It was the children of Israel. You had a unique relationship that that body of people had with other nations.  </p>
<p>00:10:50:10 - 00:11:09:08<br>Matt<br>They didn't have a king. This is before Saul becomes the first king in Israel and the children of Israel demand the king of the prophet Samuel. And so Samuel says, I don't think that's a good idea. Well, he goes and talks to the Lord about things, and he says they want a king and the Lord says, Well, give them a king.  </p>
<p>00:11:09:13 - 00:11:30:26<br>Matt<br>It's not you that they reject. That's me. And there's a point I'm making about diversity, equity and inclusion. As I as I tell the story. Then the Lord informs Samuel what's going to happen when they select a king. He tells them all sorts of things. I won't get into that. Samuel then reports back to the children of Israel and he says, Hey, I'll give you a king.  </p>
<p>00:11:30:26 - 00:11:50:23<br>Matt<br>He goes and anoint Saul. And then he tells the children of Israel. Now, let me tell you what's going to happen now that you've set up a king. And the reason they wanted a king is because it says in the text they wanted to be like other nations. So they get a king and all of the surrounding, I'll call them Arab, although I know that's incorrect.  </p>
<p>00:11:50:28 - 00:12:16:25<br>Matt<br>The surrounding Arab world from the kings of Gath to the kings of Amman to the kings of Moab and to other surrounding nations, all come to war against the children of Israel who now have a king for themselves. And what the Lord tells Samuel to tell the children of Israel is tell them that the King will take your best men and use them for his wars, because that's the only way he's going to be able to keep his kingdom intact.  </p>
<p>00:12:17:21 - 00:12:39:09<br>Matt<br>And I reflected on that when I got to that part. The idea of taking the best men. And I thought any sane ruler will always, when it comes to military, might take the best of the best. The strong men, those who love and are willing to die for their country, those who are willing to put their neck on their line for the king, and in our case in this country.  </p>
<p>00:12:39:09 - 00:12:59:23<br>Matt<br>Back to some of what we've been talking about. It's not for an administration, as K.J. just said, in one of our stupid press conferences where she wasn't sure what to call the the the dead service members. She wasn't even sure how to refer to these these men and women in uniform. It's not OBE obeisance to an administration in this country.  </p>
<p>00:12:59:23 - 00:13:32:17<br>Matt<br>It's an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. That's the oath that our service members take. And so they learn. They're trained to take that seriously. And then they see politics come in that look like domestic enemies, and they see something called diversity equity and inclusion trainings. And here's the point. They think, why in the world would we destroy a merit based promotion system, merit based selection system, putting our best foot forward on the world stage in order to deter conflict and hopefully win conflict of deterrence fails?  </p>
<p>00:13:32:29 - 00:14:05:27<br>Matt<br>Why would we pursue racial quotas? Why would we pursue sex preference and gender affiliation quotas and make sure we diminish the number of white pilots from 85% to 67.5%. That was directly out of the mouth of the Air Force spokesperson. By the way, when service members of any race and any political demographic see that kind of rhetoric and see that kind of an ideological underpinning of policy decisions, it totally the spirit's them at totally wrecks the morale that undermines good order and discipline.  </p>
<p>00:14:05:27 - 00:14:29:10<br>Matt<br>And they think, why would I want to stick around in a military that might ask me to go downrange and have bombs dropped on my head? Why would I want to serve? And and a regime that doesn't want the best of us in those seats, but is interested more in race, identity politics. That's a that's an impasse. That's why I say at the beginning, there's no logic to the decision.  </p>
<p>00:14:29:10 - 00:14:51:22<br>Matt<br>It's cult like it's religious, like it's an ideological rooted policy decision. And it says that and it's Marxist, which is why I wrote my book. It's that we've got an oppressed class and we've got an oppressor class. And unfortunately, in cultural Marxism, it's not it's it's no longer the economic class stratification of Marx and Engels. 1848 Communist Manifesto.  </p>
<p>00:14:52:10 - 00:15:25:22<br>Matt<br>It is a race based oppressor versus oppressed system. And the most blatant lie of all that has been that has been continually resurrected by race hustlers and politicians is that, well, one group of people will call them white and another group of people will call them black. And now people of color are oppressors and oppressed. And so we need to change through policy, the race demographic of our services to make things more equitable and equitable is forced equality of outcomes.  </p>
<p>00:15:25:23 - 00:15:44:21<br>Matt<br>There's a whole lot to get into there, but I, I just couldn't help but reflect on the sanity of choosing the best for your military and the insanity and lunacy of selecting people based on any other selection process or reason or notion or model other than merit.  </p>
<p>00:15:46:10 - 00:16:13:21<br>Marty<br>And when you think about it, DIY as a construct is extremely racist in and of itself. Completely takes away the agency of individuals of any race, gender, sexual preference, whatever it may be, and says we need to make carve outs to put you individuals in this place. It really denigrates, again, the agency of the individual at the end of the day.  </p>
<p>00:16:14:05 - 00:16:35:06<br>Matt<br>Well, let me share another example of how it is detrimental to good order and discipline in the military workplace. And it's true for academia. It's true in an industry. Let's suppose that you are a person of color. I don't even like using these terms that have been foisted upon us. But let's say you're a black American or let's say you're a mexican female American.  </p>
<p>00:16:35:06 - 00:16:54:00<br>Matt<br>I'm picking these very deliberately because of my time in command in the Space Force and some of the interaction I had with my troops. And let's say that this DTI training is telling you that you've been held down by the white male because of systemic racism in society. So you're thinking about that. You're in uniform, you've shown up to do your work, but you've taken a knee because you have a down day.  </p>
<p>00:16:55:11 - 00:17:15:27<br>Matt<br>And the secretary of Defense has directed all service members to consider the ways in which we can heal ourselves of our systemic racist problems. So you've got a black male, you've got a mexican female. They've done quite well in their military career up to this point in time. They've promoted, they've been rewarded, they've been awarded, they've been promoted.  </p>
<p>00:17:15:27 - 00:17:34:09<br>Matt<br>They've been selected for various programs, officers, jobs because they've performed well. And now we start to establish quotas or hint that there are racial goals. They call them goals because they know that they can get in trouble legally when they establish racial quotas. It's in violation of Civil Rights Act. It's in violation of other law that we have.  </p>
<p>00:17:34:27 - 00:17:53:29<br>Matt<br>And so they don't like to use the term quota. And that's one of the things that came up in my recent congressional hearing. So you've got these people that say, hey, like up until now, I think that it wasn't because of my race or the way that I look or my gender or my sexual preference that I've been selected for this job or that I've been promoted to this rank.  </p>
<p>00:17:53:29 - 00:18:28:03<br>Matt<br>But moving forward, I'm not sure anymore if it's going to be based on my performance or based on my ethnicity. Think about how deleterious that is to the military workplace, and I'll give you one more example that's shorter. If you have a I'm using race now, just because this is it's such a prevalent object of relevance anymore in our current ongoing dialog, it never really mattered before 2020, as far as I was concerned in the military.  </p>
<p>00:18:28:04 - 00:18:51:25<br>Matt<br>Like we didn't talk about race, we just didn't talk. I knew personally a black couple, man and wife who were being subjected to Lloyd Austin's Diversity equity and inclusion trainings in my unit, and I tried to safeguard people from my unit, but there are base wide events. There are other trainings, guest speakers that are invited in and they can go to these things if they want to.  </p>
<p>00:18:51:26 - 00:19:24:09<br>Matt<br>You can't tell them, you know, stay here, lock the door and don't don't expose yourself to this stuff. And one member of that family bought in and started to view the workplace as an oppressive environment in which she was the object of the scrutiny of white people. And the other member, the husband said, I'm not sure I buy into this training, and I think it's been unhealthy for my wife to buy into this training.  </p>
<p>00:19:24:27 - 00:19:53:00<br>Matt<br>And so it set the husband and the wife at odds because they had ideology to argue over now. And and and and I looked at that as a commander. I thought, how do you solve. Now I've got marriage problems within my unit. It's not just about like distracting from the training mission that we're trying to accomplish. I got people who are having marital problems and all of that has ripples effect through the military workplace.  </p>
<p>00:19:53:00 - 00:20:11:02<br>Matt<br>So you get feedback and you say, Hey, this is hurting morale that's dividing people in this area. What are we supposed to do about it? And it's like, well, I mean, we are the leaders, after all. We should be able to do something about it. No, but we're just following orders. You know, we're taking orders from the secretary of defense and from the Biden regime.  </p>
<p>00:20:11:03 - 00:20:15:12<br>Matt<br>Well, so you have to do something about it. People have to speak up.  </p>
<p>00:20:16:06 - 00:20:52:11<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And it seems like this this whole trend has happened rather quickly. You keep going up to 2020 and 2021, and it seems like it has had material effects on the military, the quality of the people who are enlisted, and even more so. I mentioned it earlier, but preventing people from signing up in the first place. And so how we use the word deleterious, how deleterious could this be to the quality of the United States military if things don't go back to the way they were rather quickly?  </p>
<p>00:20:53:03 - 00:21:28:19<br>Matt<br>Consider this equation. Not only did we have race identity politics show up in the uniformed services at that time, summer of 2020. I mean, the seeds had been planted long ago. We could trace through some of the history. I don't know that it's necessary, but, you know, I can point back to 2011, during the last Obama Biden administration in which there is a military leadership and diversity commission established in which they began to go through all of the regulations and D.O.D. instructions and redefine terms like diversity, equity and inclusion.  </p>
<p>00:21:28:19 - 00:21:50:23<br>Matt<br>So there are there are points in time you can certainly point to, but the seeds had to be sown through the soil over a long period of time so that at the right crisis or set of crises, they could begin to sprout and be be nurtured and and kind of take over the garden, these weeds that grow up.  </p>
<p>00:21:51:09 - 00:22:09:23<br>Matt<br>It's like, where did they all come from? All of a sudden? It's like, well, the seeds had to be planted a long time ago and the soil had to be prepared and broken up properly so that they could so that they could actually sprout. But you consider the equation. You had race identity politics in the form of diversity and inclusion trainings.  </p>
<p>00:22:10:15 - 00:22:37:11<br>Matt<br>You had mask mandates that were showing up not just across the entire globe, but I mean, not just in the military workplace, but across the entire globe. You had mask mandates, yet you had coerced shots, you had forced separation distance, social distancing that on some military bases like my own turned into an aggressive totalitarian regime, like don't go outside of your house on base without your mask, on your face.  </p>
<p>00:22:37:11 - 00:23:05:15<br>Matt<br>And if you're caught socializing with people, you're going to be in big trouble. So we had lonely families. We had all of those things underway in the lead up to a presidential election and in the aftermath of a presidential election. And now, as we approach another presidential election and people wonder the things that are happening from our border to the over, now we've got an overextension of military forces abroad.  </p>
<p>00:23:06:13 - 00:23:29:03<br>Matt<br>And so all of the things that took place three years ago and four years ago that led to terrible recruitment, terrible retention, which almost it's like, is it really by chance that all of this kind of compounded at once, or was it a deliberate weakening of the military strength of the United States and the economic strength of the United States and the social and cultural cohesion of the United States in the Western world, generally speaking?  </p>
<p>00:23:30:02 - 00:23:52:17<br>Matt<br>And however you want to answer that question, QUESTION consider the fact that it's hurt our readiness. The Heritage Foundation puts out annual reports about US military strength. It's called the index of U.S. military strength. And so the Air Force for the US military is rated as weak in this independent assessment last year and now we're very weak, I think is that Heritage just put out the new report.  </p>
<p>00:23:52:17 - 00:24:25:13<br>Matt<br>I've not yet read it, which means we're not capable of successfully waging conflict in in other in any major regional conflict in the world. And at the time that we're so weak, we can't even successfully wage a major regional conflict. We have multiple conflicts that we are starting to get involved in, in various regions around the globe that involve proxy wars with our great competitors, Russia and China and Middle Eastern foes in a conflict in Israel.  </p>
<p>00:24:26:21 - 00:25:01:26<br>Matt<br>I mean, if you couldn't tee up a better recipe for disaster for this country than to cripple us in our recruitment and readiness, to cripple us economically, to weaken us militarily, and then to overextend us on the world stage. I mean, I reflect on through Saturday's history of the Peloponnesian War and the downfall of the Athenians as they it with some tangible degree of hubris overextended themselves on the world stage, even while they have their own domestic conflict and strife.  </p>
<p>00:25:02:12 - 00:25:27:21<br>Matt<br>And I just I think, man, there's nothing new under the sun. We're teeing up a disaster for us and we're allowing millions of people to come into the country while we're doing that. There's a at least a two tiered justice system in which certain people go unpunished for terrible crimes and the most decent of citizens who are law abiding citizens like you and me, it's easy to hold us accountable for violating, violating law.  </p>
<p>00:25:28:09 - 00:25:49:03<br>Matt<br>And so it will continue to be us who are held accountable, that we continue to be us who pay taxes, whether or not those who are here illegally ever have to pay a dime. In fact, they're given taxpayer dollars. So forgive me for a moment because I've just kind of like all of a sudden there's this whole panorama that opens up to view as we start talking about all these problems that we face.  </p>
<p>00:25:49:03 - 00:26:06:12<br>Matt<br>I've been literally quite focused on the military problem specifically, but I'm very aware of the fact that it's one slice of the overarching pie of problems for the United States right now at this juncture in history. It's it's really serious problems we're facing.  </p>
<p>00:26:07:08 - 00:26:39:15<br>Marty<br>Now. You're mentioning history rhyming, and that's a subject we cover a lot here. Obviously, Bitcoin podcasts focus on economic and financial side of things, particularly the monetary situation and ancient Rome right before Rome fell, very similar problems overextended its military throughout the world and then at the same time was debasing the Roman denarius, replacing the gold with bank metal to the point where when they went to pay their military, they were looking at the coins that they were getting paid and they said, this isn't worth anything.  </p>
<p>00:26:39:28 - 00:27:05:03<br>Marty<br>We're done. And then you had the barbarians come and sack Rome. Not too too much longer. And we have a very similar situation playing here in the United States where, as you just explained, we've extended ourselves militarily across the world. We're getting involved in many different conflicts at the same time. I mean, on the heels of what's going on in Ukraine and Russia, where we've given them a lot of weapons that have been depleted.  </p>
<p>00:27:05:03 - 00:27:29:03<br>Marty<br>I mean, from reports I've read, you don't even have the weapons stockpiles that would be necessary to engage in some of these conflicts that some of the politicians that are in charge right now would like to lead us into. And it is very scary when you put all of that together. And then the social cohesion on top of the monetary and military situation, it does seem like a perfect storm.  </p>
<p>00:27:29:03 - 00:27:58:15<br>Matt<br>And it's it is yeah, it's a perfect storm. And it's like it would take a miracle to get us out of all of it. I mean, it's really and so you can understand why people are angry, justifiably so. You can understand why people are increasingly polarized and hate one another. And that's under that's understandable. It's frankly, it's the way countries fall apart.  </p>
<p>00:27:58:21 - 00:28:30:19<br>Matt<br>And I like that you brought up Rome. I'd be many of the problems we face today, and we've not touched upon some of them. I mean, there's the education system and there's other problems that we face. Many of the problems we face are reminiscent of failing empires from the past, as you suggested. I'm not quite sure I'd like someone to take up this challenge and help me out a little bit, but I like to study history.  </p>
<p>00:28:31:29 - 00:28:58:11<br>Matt<br>I don't I don't I don't recall ever having seen such a wanton destruction of one's own territorial integrity as we see in the last couple of years in this country, where you've literally got millions of people allowed to come in from every country on earth and to displace its current inhabitants, It's there's no there's no better word for it than well, there's a lot of good words for it, but it's wicked.  </p>
<p>00:28:59:15 - 00:29:35:26<br>Matt<br>Every country on earth that is a free, fairly legitimate regime. There are legitimate states. There's I don't know how many there are today, between 190 and 200 states in the international system, according to the United Nations. Every one of those states that's legitimate or is striving for legitimacy will go to war and be willing to die for and to kill over two things primarily their political sovereignty and their territorial integrity, meaning their borders.  </p>
<p>00:29:36:25 - 00:30:12:01<br>Matt<br>And both of those things are highly compromised in our country at this time. And one of them, the territorial integrity of perhaps both of them, seem to be deliberately voluntarily surrendered, which makes you wonder if it's even, you know, the United States that controls its its decision calculus and its and and the decision making apparatus. Rather. It may in fact, be the case, as many people suspect, that there are those who are interested in pursuing an entirely different global order that demands the crippling of the United States.  </p>
<p>00:30:12:27 - 00:30:38:28<br>Matt<br>If the United States ceases to have a sovereign, territorial border, and if it ceases to have political sovereignty, then it can be absorbed into a greater global community. And so it's likely to me it's all too likely to me that that's in fact, the case. But sometimes when when someone shouts like, oh, it's it's the global elite and they're tearing us down, they can't make the connection in their mind.  </p>
<p>00:30:39:09 - 00:30:57:28<br>Matt<br>A listener can hear that and say, You know, I think that's probably true, but I just don't know what that looks like and how that's unfolding, really. And I see all the problems swirling around me. Just know that there are those for a very long time and frankly, throughout all of human history who have always been interested in expanding their power and their influence and to get gain.  </p>
<p>00:30:57:28 - 00:31:23:03<br>Matt<br>And as they wield influence, they have to take out barriers to their expansion and to their dominance. And some of that evil impulse we've seen in the country for the past few years is only interested in destruction and tearing down the old order and the existing order. Oftentimes, the people that are so wantonly engaged in destruction, they happen to be the useful idiots of communism.  </p>
<p>00:31:23:28 - 00:31:49:19<br>Matt<br>They're they're just pawns. And those who are the actual planners, the strategists who are who are trying to pave the path for that future global government are happy to steamroll those useless souls the moment they have accomplished some purpose that those idiots are useful for, they they'll steamroll them all day. They'll put them up against the wall, kill them.  </p>
<p>00:31:50:12 - 00:32:04:25<br>Matt<br>And and I'm not exaggerating that one bit. They're useless to them after a certain point. They're only interested in their aims. And I think their aims will be frustrated, but it'll be really interesting, exciting and dreadful to see how all of this plays out over the next few years.  </p>
<p>00:32:05:26 - 00:32:11:08<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I mean, we had a great example of those pawns yesterday in France at the live throwing, trying to I.  </p>
<p>00:32:11:08 - 00:32:11:26<br>Matt<br>Didn't see that.  </p>
<p>00:32:12:18 - 00:32:18:18<br>Marty<br>There was another just stop oil protests where they threw paint on the Mona Lisa or the glass but all these.  </p>
<p>00:32:18:18 - 00:32:31:16<br>Matt<br>Beautiful pieces of art, they they want to go and tear it down and they're going to accomplish what you know, I guess they're they're trying to use their voice, but they're also wrecking things. And they're there's so many spirits abroad.  </p>
<p>00:32:32:18 - 00:32:55:22<br>Marty<br>That's the I mean, you said wicked earlier. And I do think good and evil exist. And evil is very pervasive throughout society right now. And as you mentioned, it has convinced many Pons to fight against their own self-interest. And propaganda is a big piece of this. I've been covering it a lot on my site. We call it climate hysteria versus climate realism.  </p>
<p>00:32:55:22 - 00:33:21:14<br>Marty<br>And the whole climate fear mongering, I think is one of the most potent that we have across the planet today. And it's just insane. Talking about we talked about military expansion making us weaker, the monetary situation making this week. But that's another key pillar, too, to the destruction of the stability of the Western world as a deconstruction of our reliable energy systems, which for the last two decades has been right.  </p>
<p>00:33:21:25 - 00:33:32:21<br>Marty<br>It's disgusting what has happened in Germany being the perfect case study. And we're trying to bring those energy policies here to the United States, which is just incredibly disheartening.  </p>
<p>00:33:33:10 - 00:34:03:18<br>Matt<br>Well, so I've got a question. It's rhetorical. I mean, it's for you and for the listener. We're mentioning all these things that are weakening. They have a tendency to destroy. They have a tendency to weaken. They have a tendency to undermine unity. They have a tendency be for failure or however you want to put it. What is it exactly that we're doing as a country right now that's making a stronger like the pick something you write?  </p>
<p>00:34:03:18 - 00:34:23:13<br>Matt<br>And so, like if I want to be honest about it, I could sit here all day long and think, What is it that we're doing as a country to make us stronger? And every thing that comes to mind where I think, okay, there's groups of people trying to do X, Y or Z, I can rebut them within within a few seconds.  </p>
<p>00:34:23:13 - 00:34:45:13<br>Matt<br>And I just think now that's all being undone. That's a terrible place to be because as you go back to how empires thrive, you need to you need to embrace principles that make you last as a and you need to militarily, at least from a security perspective, you need to you need you need to prepare for conflict in ways that make your country strong.  </p>
<p>00:34:45:14 - 00:35:16:15<br>Matt<br>That and that there's an international relations scholar that I very much I like his thinking overall. I'm not sure I like his domestic world view, like public policy world view. It doesn't matter. He's an international relations scholar, John Mearsheimer, and he wrote a book called The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. For those who are listening that appreciate international relations, terms or models, he's he's an offensive realist.  </p>
<p>00:35:18:11 - 00:35:50:20<br>Matt<br>But the point I wanted to make about Mearsheimer, what I learned from Mearsheimer and I think it's largely true the way in an international system that states measure power is by a state's economic strength and its military might. Those two things together determine how strong a country is and at least also drive perceptions in the international community of how strong that country is.  </p>
<p>00:35:52:06 - 00:36:12:12<br>Matt<br>When a country forfeits its economic might, it doesn't. It almost doesn't matter how strong its military is for very long because it's going to go out the window. Pretty soon you'll stop being able to pay, you'll stop being able to pay for weapons and and procure innovative new technologies, for example. That's just one example of how this works.  </p>
<p>00:36:12:12 - 00:36:48:23<br>Matt<br>But both of those things have to be strong and flourishing. You need a strong economy, you need a strong military. And frankly, you can add to that, although it's not a part of the international relations paradigm, necessarily not at least in the realist model, you need a people that have some sense, have some sense of patriotism or nationalism that says internally in the soul of the country, culturally, socially, that they are willing, they love their country, and they're willing to go lay down their lives and die for their country because they believe in what their country is pursuing.  </p>
<p>00:36:49:14 - 00:37:12:10<br>Matt<br>We have many good, patriotic, nationalistic in every positive sense of those terms, by the way, they've been demonized, too. There's a constant changing of language, but those are powerful forces. We have very patriotic men and women in this country who love their country and who want who are willing to die for it. But they watch what's happening on the world stage right now.  </p>
<p>00:37:12:10 - 00:37:47:21<br>Matt<br>And they say, I'm not willing to die for that. What am I trying to secure exactly? If I if I sign up today and swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution, am I going to defend the Constitution or am I as that that What's her name? JP jumper, that stupid spokes person. She's an idiot. She really she's she's about as terrible as it gets as she says she she wanted to thank the the three people who those folks that wear the uniform.  </p>
<p>00:37:47:24 - 00:37:57:28<br>Matt<br>You can go watch the video just a couple of days ago. It's totally offensive who who died serving this administration. That's utter bullshit. People don't.  </p>
<p>00:37:58:07 - 00:37:58:23<br>Marty<br>Slip.  </p>
<p>00:37:59:06 - 00:38:19:14<br>Matt<br>That's like you don't. You don't. Yeah, and that's exactly. That's right. That's what it was. She's like, Yeah, they died serving the administration. That's true. But that's not why young men and women sign up to serve in the military. They're not interested in serving in administration. And because this administration, unfortunately, views it that way, it's like, hey, you're faithful to the administration.  </p>
<p>00:38:20:12 - 00:38:39:09<br>Matt<br>There are many people on both sides of the political aisle that have no interest in in serving their country. It's like, yeah, I'll serve this administration, but when the next one comes in, I'm not I'm not sure I'll be interested in serving the interests of the administration. Military men and women can think that way, ideally, and I know it doesn't always work this way anymore.  </p>
<p>00:38:39:19 - 00:39:17:13<br>Matt<br>Ideally, any administration, regardless of their political party, would come in adamantly interested in preserving political sovereignty and territorial integrity, believing in the Constitution and our values as a country, believing in a national identity. And if you have presidents and administrations come in with those with with the apparent interest in preserving our values as a country, whatever your political makeup, whatever your religious worldview, then you have willing citizens who can, in an all volunteer force, sign up to die for their country.  </p>
<p>00:39:18:11 - 00:39:36:13<br>Matt<br>The moment people start sniffing you out and saying like, I don't even think you're interested in preserving our border, I don't even think we're not even preserving our border or political sovereignty. And we're demonizing one side or the other of the political aisle. And you're going to send me to go die in Syria? Like for who? Exactly what?  </p>
<p>00:39:36:17 - 00:39:57:27<br>Matt<br>What are we preserving? So and we get all of this and I'm thinking out loud, but you know, your listener gets this because the comment because the average American has common sense. And if you're disgusted by what you're seeing for various reasons, think about if you were 18 or 19 and and someone said, we'd like you to serve in an all volunteer force and maybe go die for your country.  </p>
<p>00:39:57:27 - 00:40:23:21<br>Matt<br>And it's like the question immediately is, I'm not sure I'm willing to do that. Die for what exactly? What are we preserving here? So with that's a big problem to solve. And even if we solved that today, somehow in an amazing way, we solved it today. The consequences of our decisions for the past several years will last for many years, and it takes years to recover from the buffoonery that we've been watching for the past several years.  </p>
<p>00:40:23:21 - 00:40:27:22<br>Matt<br>So that's why people like me are very hard on the decisions that we're making.  </p>
<p>00:40:30:02 - 00:40:50:20<br>Marty<br>And you mentioned it twice now. It would take a miracle to solve this problem for being pragmatic, recognizing that the problem exist. We do need a solution. The solution may take years to implement. What, in your mind are the first steps that we could take as a country to begin mending this gaping hole that we have in the culture of our military?  </p>
<p>00:40:51:19 - 00:40:53:14<br>Matt<br>Are you asking what are the first steps?  </p>
<p>00:40:53:28 - 00:40:54:11<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:40:54:25 - 00:41:23:15<br>Matt<br>Okay. Boy, that's we've gone down the hole of cynicism and sarcasm and not some not sarcasm, but cynicism. Negativity. And it's you have to you have to be very real. Right. All right. So so let me come out of that as best I can, because it's equally as true to assert that if our country is to survive, we need good men and women who love their country serving in uniform.  </p>
<p>00:41:24:02 - 00:41:45:07<br>Matt<br>As it is to say that we're facing all these problems, it's equally as true to say that. So the problem then becomes how do you get good men and women to serve in uniform? And again, admittedly, I'm talking about the military problem that we're facing. There's all these other problems that need to be solved. So an can make a big difference.  </p>
<p>00:41:45:07 - 00:42:11:28<br>Matt<br>And so let's assume for a moment that, you know, let's assume for a moment that you get a better administration in place and you've got a president that's able to solve problems, then you've got part of the problem solved that's that by executive fiat through executive order, some of the idiot policies that are currently in place that are wrecking good order and discipline can be removed on day one, just as has happened.  </p>
<p>00:42:12:12 - 00:42:43:27<br>Matt<br>And the change from the Trump administration to the Biden administration, where on day one, President Biden and on day one, Joe Biden issued a number of executive orders, and one of those was to advance equity in the military, workplace and in the federal agencies and DNI trainings came back on steroids and have been wrecking house ever since. And drag shows and pride activism and all this stuff.  </p>
<p>00:42:43:27 - 00:43:08:27<br>Matt<br>It's like, go do all of that in the civilian world. Stop tampering around with the military apparatus and let people focus on their mission in the workplace. So on day one, that's one change that can happen. You can have an executive commander in chief, executive branch commander in chief come in and change policy that could incentivize people to return to the military in hopes that things will turn around.  </p>
<p>00:43:08:29 - 00:43:37:29<br>Matt<br>So I admit that's possible. Instead of congressmen vying for another term in office and not solving the problems bipartisanly that we need solved in this country, instead preserving the problems so that they can all continue to point fingers across the political aisle and and and and be adamant with their voter base that they are the ones to solve those problems during their next term in office.  </p>
<p>00:43:38:16 - 00:43:55:04<br>Matt<br>If we could actually come together in a bipartisan way and solve problems because we genuinely loved and cared for our country, that would be a way that you incentivize men and women to come and sign up to serve in their military, potentially die for their country. But why would you die for a country you're not sure is going to be around in ten years?  </p>
<p>00:43:55:13 - 00:44:19:27<br>Matt<br>I'd rather live and take care of my family. So the other thing is, and this is not specifically related to the military, but it can pertain to those who have ambitions to serve in the military. People can get you can't always solve the problems at the federal level. There's a giant swamp of people who are entrenched there that aren't going anywhere.  </p>
<p>00:44:20:11 - 00:44:48:06<br>Matt<br>And it almost hasn't mattered what administration came into power. Good people in their states and in their cities can get involved in local government. They can get involved and in school boards. They can get involved in grassroots roots movements that seek to get victories. And unfortunately for decent people who like the privacy of their own lives, it means becoming slightly more activist than they've ever been in their lives.  </p>
<p>00:44:48:06 - 00:45:20:29<br>Matt<br>You can do that in as decent a way as you know how in as noble a way as you know how with while keeping your integrity intact and not becoming slimy as a human being and turning into a monster, you can get involved at the local level and make some impact in your community. And that's a great way to create a sphere of influence, of decency and integrity and law abiding, law abiding citizens and lawfulness where you live despite hell that's being unleashed in our country by by the by any administration.  </p>
<p>00:45:22:04 - 00:46:01:25<br>Matt<br>It might not save your country, but it might make your local more livable and more sane. Don't let bullies steamroll the majority of people in your area into adopting values and the public education system that are totally anathema to the vast majority of parents, for example. And people are starting to do that. And I think it's far more likely that in our local communities, our families, our churches, our local government, where we're able to have impact for good than it is for some citizen in small town Nebraska to rise up and make a difference at the federal level.  </p>
<p>00:46:04:12 - 00:46:32:19<br>Matt<br>You see these truckers, you see you see tractors all over social media, see truckers, you see farmers, you see cowboys, you see the patriots there, the alleged MAGA alt riders there. They're coming from everywhere, all over the country to support what appears to be Texas standing against the federal government and trying to secure the border. The sane person says, What the hell is Texas been doing the last several years?  </p>
<p>00:46:32:20 - 00:47:15:03<br>Matt<br>Like, why now? You know, but but Governor Abbott has issued some strong statements and people are showing up because they genuinely want to do something. And it's like we'll get involved in that. But beware, because you've got a federal government that's weaponized against you at the moment and these gun toting Americans that want to show up and a show of force at the Texas border and do some good just might find themselves the object of a conspiracy, see to or a false flag that that makes it look like, hey, we've got a bunch of we've got a bunch of patriot extremists who have shown up causing trouble and now now you're in a shooting match  </p>
<p>00:47:15:03 - 00:47:34:08<br>Matt<br>and that that's not going to end well either. So it's a very it's a precarious time. Everyone's aware of that. Get involved locally. And and if you're here's another thing. Thanks for giving me a free mike, by the way, to just kind of ramble. I'll try and be more pointed and direct in what time we've got remaining.  </p>
<p>00:47:34:18 - 00:47:35:13<br>Marty<br>No, this is awesome.  </p>
<p>00:47:35:27 - 00:48:03:27<br>Matt<br>If you're a man or a woman in uniform, you need to speak. Speak up and and and not be afraid of punishment. Because if you are not acting illegally or unethically or immorally, funny enough, immoral shows up. We're doing drag shows and people are dressing up as dogs and dancing around. And it's like, that isn't immoral. What is the morality anymore?  </p>
<p>00:48:03:27 - 00:48:24:26<br>Matt<br>So let's say let me eliminate that one. If you're not doing something unethical or illegal, then you should feel free to use your voice to say, I disagree with what I'm hearing. I disagree with what I'm seeing, and I have a different set of values and you're offending me in this training is offensive to me. This policy is offensive to me.  </p>
<p>00:48:25:01 - 00:48:44:15<br>Matt<br>This is me not trying to be partizan as a service member. This is me saying I have a voice. I'm going to use it and and start to stand up because there are literally thousands of people all across the bases that are near you that feel the same way that you do. But they're afraid to speak because they've been trained that they're supposed to be yes men.  </p>
<p>00:48:44:15 - 00:49:08:28<br>Matt<br>They're trained that they need to be loyal to senior leaders and and to to a military chain of command. And you need to respect all of that. And that's important for good order and discipline. But don't let your services be steamrolled by political activists. And I don't care if you're a Democrat or Republican or libertarian, doesn't matter. Speak up and say, hey, this is offensive.  </p>
<p>00:49:09:08 - 00:49:24:14<br>Matt<br>I'm not a racist, so stop calling me one. This guy doesn't want to be treated like an object because of his race. So knock it off. Like we're not interested in this training, so shut the hell up. We're walking out of here. Kind of a thing Like you have to be able to stand up. And if you get paperwork, you get punished.  </p>
<p>00:49:24:14 - 00:49:36:05<br>Matt<br>Like, live. Live with it. Suck. You know, suck it up. That's a small sacrifice to make to try and speak to your principles and stand on your values and to try and preserve the integrity of the United States military.  </p>
<p>00:49:38:03 - 00:50:08:15<br>Marty<br>Now you're echoing something that we say a lot on this show is that the silent majority of people who just want to make a good life for their family do good work, be productive throughout society and live a comfortable life, need to have confidence instilled in them to speak up against the madness, whether it's in the military, with the monetary system, in the in the energy sector, with the woke agenda that's being pushed throughout the schooling system.  </p>
<p>00:50:09:12 - 00:50:16:26<br>Marty<br>I truly believe deep down that most people do not want any of this and are just too afraid and self-censor.  </p>
<p>00:50:17:06 - 00:50:50:11<br>Matt<br>And I think you're right. There's a lot of decent people in every country on planet Earth. They're just they just want to be left alone by their governments. They to raise their kids, to be decent humans. And they see all this evil and and ignorance and mean spiritedness and they're like, And so when you want to speak your values and here's some advice for you, remember that you're not the bad guy like you're just speaking, You're using your voice in a country that above all has valued free speech throughout its history.  </p>
<p>00:50:50:11 - 00:51:08:09<br>Matt<br>It's like, use your voice, speak up, Take some spears from people saying, Oh my gosh, you're mean. Are you really that bigoted? Are you really that racist? Like, No, I'm none of those things, but I have values and I've wanted to be a decent human my whole life. And you're starting to bully me and I won't accept it.  </p>
<p>00:51:08:09 - 00:51:29:28<br>Matt<br>So it's like, back up, get the hell out of my bubble and and stop bullying the majority of people here that feel like I do, like I'm just. I just want to be free of tyranny. And you're starting to play the role of the tyrant. So get out of my space, you know, and and say that to your supervisor in the military and say like, Hey, respectfully, get out of this space of my values.  </p>
<p>00:51:30:11 - 00:51:48:15<br>Matt<br>I'm here to do a mission for the United States military, and you're changing directions for some reason. So stop being a political person. With all due respect, sir, ma'am, or they or juror or whatever you go by, step out of my space. Either teach me how to do my mission or I've got no respect for you anymore. And you can have someone working under you.  </p>
<p>00:51:48:15 - 00:51:57:14<br>Matt<br>In fact, all of my all of my buddies here, we're we're not going to have respect for you. We'll follow your orders that are legal. But you've lost all of our respect because you're a political animal.  </p>
<p>00:51:59:06 - 00:52:31:29<br>Marty<br>If enough people do that, I think we can change things rather quickly. Again, there's something good psychology weekly inverse humans that they self-censor due to fear of retribution and retaliation. And it is weird and I think where we stand today in 2024, it is more important than ever that people speak up. I mean, this is a show heavily focused on Bitcoin and, you know, like we focus on Bitcoin because we believe the root of a lot of the strife that we're feeling today is the money.  </p>
<p>00:52:31:29 - 00:53:00:01<br>Marty<br>When you corrupt the money, you can print it out of nothing and throw it at DEA initiatives and right woke university systems and big pharma studies. It really corrupts the incentives of the economy overall and really corrupts opportunity cost. At the end of the day, you can just print money and throw it at these useless, unproductive activities. And I do think people are feeling it, particularly on the money side with inflation, people are feeling inflation.  </p>
<p>00:53:00:01 - 00:53:15:10<br>Marty<br>They see it week in and week out at the grocery store and no matter how many times John Pare, Pierre tells you that that inflation has been solved, it's very obvious to people that it has not. People need to speak up against all of this.  </p>
<p>00:53:15:25 - 00:53:39:03<br>Matt<br>The economy is stronger than ever. And and and God bless our heroes who wear that uniform of this administration. Oh, she wouldn't say God bless. But, you know, you bring up such a good point about how money incentivizes a lot of this industry that DIY facilitators and and public speakers are making a lot better money than you and I are.  </p>
<p>00:53:39:26 - 00:54:02:06<br>Matt<br>And it's it's quite lucrative. And you've got there's a reason you pay in theory there's a reason you pay most of your teachers low salary. You don't want them to be incentivized by the wrong thing. I'm not I'm not saying I don't advocate for like improving pay for teachers, too, but like, it's like we want good teachers, not people incentivized by by filthy lucre.  </p>
<p>00:54:02:18 - 00:54:21:26<br>Matt<br>We don't pay our police forces very well. We don't pay an all voluntary force very well because it's like we want you to choose to swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution against its enemies and to come in not for the purposes of getting wealthy, but because we'll provide sufficient for your needs while you do something.  </p>
<p>00:54:21:27 - 00:54:51:04<br>Matt<br>Out of the motivation of honor and integrity duty to country service before self. And and that's worked really well while you had nation that was guided by some kind of a moral compass where you had teachers who were authentically interested in teaching something for for little or nothing when you had police forces who are interested in law and order and we had military forces who believed in the might, the military might of the United States and of its and of the American ideal.  </p>
<p>00:54:51:28 - 00:55:21:28<br>Matt<br>And when you lose the moral compass and when this country ceases to look and feel like America, you start to pay all of the wrong people. And and sickos and sycophants and narcissists come in to positions in all of those places. And the ones that toe the party line end up being rewarded with social credits or money. Yeah, a lot of change needs to take place if we're going to if we're if we're going to.  </p>
<p>00:55:24:06 - 00:55:30:03<br>Matt<br>Hmm. I always try and be honest. Well, if we're going to reverse course, then a lot of change needs to take place.  </p>
<p>00:55:31:06 - 00:55:54:09<br>Marty<br>I agree. And luckily we have individuals like yourself out there fighting the good fight. I know we only have 2 minutes left here, so I want to again, thank you for everything you're doing. I think it's extremely important. We need more voices like yours out there incentivizing and instilling confidence in people and letting them know, like, Hey, you're not alone here.  </p>
<p>00:55:54:22 - 00:56:01:25<br>Marty<br>There's many others who think everything that's going on right now is quite crazy. And if you don't like it, you should speak up against it.  </p>
<p>00:56:04:02 - 00:56:33:22<br>Matt<br>Yeah. Sometimes people are afraid to speak solely because they're not sure how to defend or how to defend their worldview or to articulate it. And so one of the pieces of advice I give to people is, next time you're stumped in a conversation with someone and you're not sure how you should have responded, you better think about it then and know that next time you'll never be stumped again by that problem and and just come up with two or three talking points and then be willing to be humble and ask other people questions about their worldview.  </p>
<p>00:56:33:22 - 00:56:52:07<br>Matt<br>And a lot of the lunacy that you see parading around us is not logical, it's not defendable. And they can't articulate their worldview. They've got talking points that they've memorized. And so like, learn about your values, learn how to articulate them. And sometimes don't be afraid to say I disagree, even if you're not sure how to articulate your worldview.  </p>
<p>00:56:52:07 - 00:56:55:23<br>Matt<br>And that's kind of the beginning place for exercising your free speech.  </p>
<p>00:56:56:10 - 00:57:02:22<br>Marty<br>Yeah, great advice, Matt. Thank you for joining us today. I thoroughly enjoyed this conversation.  </p>
<p>00:57:03:12 - 00:57:03:28<br>Matt<br>Thank you.  </p>
<p>00:57:04:22 - 00:57:07:01<br>Marty<br>All right. That's all we got today. Peace and love for.</p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:image href="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/478-Matthew-Lohmeier.png"/>
      </item>
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[What It Was Like Launching Bitcoin In El Salvador]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[This episode of TFTC with Marty and Sean McDonnell covered a range of personal experiences, business insights, and the intersection of technology, health, and sports.]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode of TFTC with Marty and Sean McDonnell covered a range of personal experiences, business insights, and the intersection of technology, health, and sports.]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 21:02:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iolaunching-bitcoin-in-el-salvador/</link>
      <comments>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iolaunching-bitcoin-in-el-salvador/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qqcksar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7mrpw4hxx6rfdenj6cnfw33k76tw945kutt9dskhxctvweskgmmj9upzq2pydthdke720vjsrjm9srwq9jcjkqk24nk37u5mkcv46p3tzz9dqvzqqqr4gu20fg23</guid>
      <category>TFTC Podcast</category>
      
        <media:content url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/477-Sean-McDonnell.png" medium="image"/>
        <enclosure 
          url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/477-Sean-McDonnell.png" length="0" 
          type="image/png" 
        />
      <noteId>naddr1qqcksar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7mrpw4hxx6rfdenj6cnfw33k76tw945kutt9dskhxctvweskgmmj9upzq2pydthdke720vjsrjm9srwq9jcjkqk24nk37u5mkcv46p3tzz9dqvzqqqr4gu20fg23</noteId>
      <npub>npub19qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksn4zc3g</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrib]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/launching-bitcoin-in-el-salvador/">Read original post</a></p>
<h1>Key Takeaways</h1>
<p>This episode of TFTC with Marty and Sean McDonnell covered a range of personal experiences, business insights, and the intersection of technology, health, and sports. The conversation delved into various topics, including their past in sports, particularly lacrosse, entrepreneurship, health and wellness, and the importance of Bitcoin in today’s economy.</p>
<h2>Lacrosse Memories</h2>
<p>Marty and Sean reminisced about their lacrosse days, sharing a story from Marty's last game and the severe concussion he suffered. This incident marked a turning point in his life, leading him away from sports and towards economics and eventually Bitcoin.</p>
<h2>Entrepreneurship and Business</h2>
<p>The episode touched upon their respective entrepreneurial journeys, with Sean discussing his involvement in a range of ventures, from selling shoes to video editing for influencers. His most recent venture is Salt of the Earth, an electrolyte company that aims to address chronic dehydration.</p>
<h2>Health and Wellness</h2>
<p>Sean shared his personal story of giving up alcohol and noted the benefits of improved sleep and overall health. His journey into wellness influenced the creation of Salt of the Earth, driven by his understanding of the importance of hydration and electrolytes.</p>
<h2>Bitcoin and Technology</h2>
<p>The conversation included insights into the crypto space, with Sean recounting his involvement in the rollout of Bitcoin as legal tender in El Salvador. He also recounted his own realization of the significance of Bitcoin over the years and its potential impact on the global economy.</p>
<h2>Sponsors</h2>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h1>Best Quotes</h1>
<ul>
<li>"I couldn't articulate the letters of my name. I could see it, but after that hit, I just couldn't spell it out."</li>
<li>"Being dehydrated feels a lot like being hungry. Sometimes you're not hungry; you're just thirsty."</li>
<li>"Starting your own business is like staring into a dark abyss while eating glass, but when you see things start to take off, it’s pure euphoria."</li>
<li>"When I shared Salt of the Earth with Marty, and he tweeted about it, orders started coming in non-stop. It was one of the highest moments I've experienced."</li>
</ul>
<h1>Conclusion</h1>
<p>The episode painted a vivid picture of the challenges and triumphs of entrepreneurship, the importance of health and wellness, and the revolutionary potential of Bitcoin. Sean's journey from a lacrosse player to a tech entrepreneur and health enthusiast was a testament to the power of personal transformation and the pursuit of passion. The discussion on Bitcoin's role in El Salvador demonstrated the real-world applications of cryptocurrency and the evolving landscape of digital finance. This conversation was a blend of nostalgia, innovation, and forward-thinking, reflecting the varied interests and experiences of the hosts and their guest.</p>
<h1>Timestamps</h1>
<p><strong>Timestamps:</strong><br>0:00 - Intro<br>6:32 - Lacrosse<br>15:59 - Groupon<br>23:23 - Giving up the party life<br>27:11 - Skiing story<br>32:51 - Coding bootcamp<br>38:06 - Bitcoin<br>43:01 - Bukele’s war room<br>52:24 - Starting Salt of the Earth<br>1:02:50 - Electrolytes<br>1:14:24 - Jack Dorsey story</p>
<h1>Transcript</h1>
<p>00:00:00:00 - 00:00:02:05<br>Sean<br>Come. You don't talk about owls Lacrosse anymore.  </p>
<p>00:00:02:07 - 00:00:03:15<br>Marty<br>Owls. Lacrosse.  </p>
<p>00:00:03:18 - 00:00:04:15  </p>
<p>Owls. Lacrosse.  </p>
<p>00:00:04:15 - 00:00:06:16<br>Marty<br>Still big fan of owls. Lacrosse.  </p>
<p>00:00:06:18 - 00:00:11:28  </p>
<p>Shout out to Sam, Sam and a lot of owls. Lacrosse.  </p>
<p>00:00:12:05 - 00:00:23:25<br>Marty<br>Unfortunately a cash up. Not unfortunately, just where the business cash app is in. Sponsor That was a that was a deal we did with Cash app where people would sign up.  </p>
<p>00:00:23:28 - 00:00:25:27<br>Sean<br>On your just given the like referral to.  </p>
<p>00:00:25:27 - 00:00:28:18<br>Marty<br>Them. I think so yeah.  </p>
<p>00:00:28:20 - 00:00:32:02<br>Sean<br>Yeah they seem to be doing great.  </p>
<p>00:00:32:04 - 00:00:49:04<br>Marty<br>Sam's crushing it. I talked to him I think like six months ago. It's funny, one of the girls, um, women who works here in the comments was friends with him growing up, and we somehow stumbled. I think I was talking about owls Lacrosse. She's like, you know, Sam It's like, Yeah. And it's a.  </p>
<p>00:00:49:06 - 00:01:01:27<br>Sean<br>So the girl out there, Julia, said she, like, got the job because of her brother was a listener of you. Do you know who her brother is?  </p>
<p>00:01:02:03 - 00:01:08:18<br>Marty<br>I don't know. There's a lot of listeners out there, so we've come a long way from the Deep Lakes days to.  </p>
<p>00:01:08:21 - 00:01:22:00<br>Sean<br>Yeah, well, I was done playing 2010 and that was Dude, how about we tell the story of your last game? Just your last game, right?  </p>
<p>00:01:22:02 - 00:01:25:07<br>Marty<br>Last game. Ever hung up. Hung up the cleats after.  </p>
<p>00:01:25:07 - 00:01:30:06<br>Sean<br>That was all right. You want to, like, tell your side of the story and then I'll I'll fill it in here.  </p>
<p>00:01:30:06 - 00:01:31:03<br>Marty<br>We're playing Augustana.  </p>
<p>00:01:31:09 - 00:01:32:03<br>Sean<br>Augustana.  </p>
<p>00:01:32:04 - 00:01:36:25<br>Marty<br>Augustana. We're in Rock Island, Illinois, on the border of Illinois and Iowa.  </p>
<p>00:01:36:25 - 00:01:41:06<br>Sean<br>This is 2010. Must have been there in 2009, 2010, 2010.  </p>
<p>00:01:41:09 - 00:01:57:21<br>Marty<br>We were on the back end of a road trip. We had gone down to like Saint Louis and made our way back up to Rock Island, right? Yeah. And we're playing in the middle of nowhere, tired. I think it was our third game that weekend. I think we were in Indianapolis and Missouri.  </p>
<p>00:01:57:22 - 00:01:59:01<br>Sean<br>Horse scheduling just.  </p>
<p>00:01:59:01 - 00:02:19:12<br>Marty<br>Like, and then up to Iowa. Yeah, I decided I want to play long stick. I don't want to play close defense. I wanted to play Moody. So I grabbed a stick and then Pat Desmond, who I saw crying on Instagram because the Detroit Lions won a playoff game for the first time in 30 years the other day.  </p>
<p>00:02:19:12 - 00:02:22:05<br>Sean<br>How did I miss that thing? Oh, he.  </p>
<p>00:02:22:07 - 00:02:41:27<br>Marty<br>He threw me. So in lacrosse, when the goalie saves the ball and you break out to start the transition, you're looking for the ball over your shoulder, looking back at the goalie and the goalie supposed to throw you a tight a type of right to your stick because there's defenders out there that could hit you. Desmond threw me.  </p>
<p>00:02:41:27 - 00:02:42:06<br>Marty<br>What?  </p>
<p>00:02:42:09 - 00:02:49:04<br>Sean<br>I mean, he shouldn't. And she shouldn't even looked. She shouldn't even looked. You're right in the middle of the field.  </p>
<p>00:02:49:06 - 00:02:49:20<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:02:49:27 - 00:03:07:17<br>Sean<br>Like, definitely, you know, go to the outside. And I mean, you just do one of these over your shoulder. And it was just body parts like nice lob hits your stick. And it was just like that.  </p>
<p>00:03:07:22 - 00:03:13:03<br>Marty<br>Sun had to be like 65, £250. Hit me straight in the chest. I mean, I don't remember any of it.  </p>
<p>00:03:13:06 - 00:03:22:27<br>Sean<br>And like, you just hit the ground so hard. It was like a big duffel bag just got dropped from like a ten story building. That's how it sounded.  </p>
<p>00:03:23:00 - 00:03:24:15<br>Marty<br>And I got knocked out for.  </p>
<p>00:03:24:17 - 00:03:31:27<br>Sean<br>You, got up, like, right away and you came and you came out of the side. And I remember being like.  </p>
<p>00:03:32:00 - 00:03:32:29  </p>
<p>I was like, Hey, I'm out.  </p>
<p>00:03:33:00 - 00:03:53:28<br>Sean<br>He really got his bell rung and I was like, Okay. But like, I was trying to keep pushing you to, like, go back. I was like, Yeah. And I'm like, we just need to, you know, get some momentum on offense and get it going. And you were like, ready to go back out. And Tim, this is another carrier.  </p>
<p>00:03:54:00 - 00:04:15:12<br>Sean<br>Tim Carrier was like, we were so ragtag that it was like always a player coach. Tim was senior and he was the head coach and he was like, Dude, he's not going back. He's not going back up. And you're like, Ready to go? And then he goes, He's like, Steak, what? What day is it? And you're just like.  </p>
<p>00:04:15:14 - 00:04:18:00  </p>
<p>Oh, fuck, Dad.  </p>
<p>00:04:18:00 - 00:04:20:18<br>Marty<br>No, it was I got to tell her to piss myself.  </p>
<p>00:04:20:19 - 00:04:28:14<br>Sean<br>That was scary. And that sooner, like I got to take him to the hospital and drove you to the hospital.  </p>
<p>00:04:28:14 - 00:04:34:20<br>Marty<br>And I know an ambulance showed up. I went in the ambulance because I remember they put an I.V. and me in the ambulance.  </p>
<p>00:04:34:24 - 00:04:47:27<br>Sean<br>So I went in the ambulance with you and had to call your mom because I was the president. And, um, man, that was that sucked. Like.  </p>
<p>00:04:48:00 - 00:04:48:14<br>Marty<br>Know I remember.  </p>
<p>00:04:48:15 - 00:04:52:16<br>Sean<br>And you're like, this is like, I was like, have you had a concussion before?  </p>
<p>00:04:52:16 - 00:04:56:12  </p>
<p>And you're like, Yeah, it's like my seventh one or something.  </p>
<p>00:04:56:12 - 00:05:21:26<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it was my sixth. Pretty bad concussion. I remember coming to in the, uh, in the middle of Rock Island, Illinois, the middle of nowhere, like waiting in the waiting room for a doctor to see me. And I come to, like, I think I'd come out of the. The fog I was in after being hit, and I, like, come to the first thing I see is this, like, dude with, like, a bald head and he's got a tattoo of the middle finger on the back of his head.  </p>
<p>00:05:21:26 - 00:05:24:27<br>Marty<br>I was like, Where the fuck am I? What am I doing here?  </p>
<p>00:05:24:27 - 00:05:26:14<br>Sean<br>Get over Rock Island.  </p>
<p>00:05:26:16 - 00:05:39:26<br>Marty<br>And then you. I think it was ghetto. And Reed waited, and we drove back to Chicago through the middle of the night. And I was fucked up for, like, two weeks.  </p>
<p>00:05:39:28 - 00:05:56:17<br>Sean<br>Yeah, I mean, that's. That was, that was. And that was scary. I remember just being like, I couldn't believe I felt so guilty that I was like, I wanted you to just keep playing, like, Dude, come on, let's go. And Tim, when he called you out on the date, I was like, Wow, that's I guess that's how, you know.  </p>
<p>00:05:56:20 - 00:06:13:29<br>Marty<br>I couldn't even spell my name. And I think it's weird because I have like, these. I remember Tim asked me that and I didn't know I didn't know what day was. And I remember asking me to spell my name and I could see my name and my brain, but I couldn't like, articulate the letters. I was like, that.  </p>
<p>00:06:14:02 - 00:06:15:02<br>Marty<br>Here we are, though.  </p>
<p>00:06:15:04 - 00:06:17:19<br>Sean<br>I mean, you've come a long way. Yeah, come a long way.  </p>
<p>00:06:17:19 - 00:06:19:03<br>Marty<br>I became that player, coach.  </p>
<p>00:06:19:06 - 00:06:19:27<br>Sean<br>And after.  </p>
<p>00:06:19:28 - 00:06:21:21<br>Marty<br>I got knocked out, I started coaching my sophomore.  </p>
<p>00:06:21:21 - 00:06:28:00<br>Sean<br>Year. Then that was. Yeah, sophomore year. How did you guys do sophomore and junior year?  </p>
<p>00:06:28:03 - 00:06:36:10<br>Marty<br>The we kept getting progressively better. Sophomore year was the worst, but the junior and senior year we did well obviously the senior year and then with the ship.  </p>
<p>00:06:36:12 - 00:06:42:23<br>Sean<br>And you didn't have any other coach sophomore year or junior that.  </p>
<p>00:06:42:26 - 00:06:48:15<br>Marty<br>Kolber was the name. He was terrible and he tried to he tried to be like the head coach.  </p>
<p>00:06:48:18 - 00:06:51:16<br>Sean<br>I think we're probably going to get some deep wax guys listening to this.  </p>
<p>00:06:51:19 - 00:06:53:21  </p>
<p>Hopefully, right?  </p>
<p>00:06:53:23 - 00:07:18:09<br>Marty<br>I would imagine. But no, it's weird thinking that because that that was like 2010 I got knocked out, couldn't play lacrosse and went complete sports anymore. Stuff like basketball at 3 a.m.. And that's like sort of what sent me down the path to Bitcoin. I was like, I can't play sports anymore. Only focus on economics and all the shit and fell down the Bitcoin rabbit only two and a half years later.  </p>
<p>00:07:18:11 - 00:07:23:23<br>Sean<br>Yeah. In 2013 was the championship season.  </p>
<p>00:07:23:24 - 00:07:24:07<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:07:24:11 - 00:07:27:20<br>Sean<br>When your boy showed up as an assistant assistant coach.  </p>
<p>00:07:27:25 - 00:07:35:25<br>Marty<br>Yes. Thank you. From the from the mean streets, the GrubHub coming in to a Groupon. Groupon, not GrubHub.  </p>
<p>00:07:35:28 - 00:07:59:09<br>Sean<br>And I wasn't even a hacker. But at the time I was at this other company called Bright Tag, and I was not enjoying my job. And I just remember being like, This is sweet. Like this team is like winning and like, and then going down and winning the conference championship. Great Rivers Conference. Yes.  </p>
<p>00:07:59:09 - 00:08:00:12<br>Marty<br>Yeah, yeah.  </p>
<p>00:08:00:12 - 00:08:25:02<br>Sean<br>I'll see. And then go into the national championship tournament. That was like so fun to just like because when I was playing, it was like the first year we were killing it. We had all these Brother Rice guys. We were like smoke in the league. And then we got moved up into like a legit league conference and then we were just getting our asses kicked by like Wheaton and like, because we were just like, partying a lot.  </p>
<p>00:08:25:02 - 00:08:48:18<br>Sean<br>And like, these guys are all sober, just working us. But like, we had kids from Brother Rice, you know, like the best school in the Midwest. But yeah, that was so fun. Like seeing a team that you built pretty much from like the freshman year. It's like sophomore year and then coach, like, win the championship. That was like, it was awesome.  </p>
<p>00:08:48:24 - 00:09:11:05<br>Marty<br>All it took was a little structure. All I did was add six, eight workouts in the offseason and two practices a week in season. We just had camaraderie and a bit of structure and actually obviously playing lacrosse in the Northeast allows you to know the game pretty well. I knew how to organize a defense, I handle the defense, and there were some players on the team that could put together an offense.  </p>
<p>00:09:11:05 - 00:09:15:20<br>Marty<br>It's like you guys focus on offense and make the defense as good.  </p>
<p>00:09:15:22 - 00:09:22:12<br>Sean<br>Yeah, I didn't even really like trying to do any Xs and I was I was like, just trying to hype everyone up like.  </p>
<p>00:09:22:14 - 00:09:27:19  </p>
<p>Like just fucking kick the shit out of these guys. Let's go.  </p>
<p>00:09:27:21 - 00:09:29:10<br>Marty<br>But we've come a long way since then.  </p>
<p>00:09:29:14 - 00:09:30:14<br>Sean<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:09:30:17 - 00:09:34:06<br>Marty<br>Like you said, you're a ten year long at someone.  </p>
<p>00:09:34:08 - 00:09:35:14<br>Sean<br>And bright tag, right?  </p>
<p>00:09:35:14 - 00:09:42:08<br>Marty<br>Tag You don't seem like somebody likes being chained to a desk or working for a company.  </p>
<p>00:09:42:10 - 00:10:19:27<br>Sean<br>Now, when I was working at Groupon, I really enjoyed I was doing sales and I was like launching markets. My first market at Groupon was Fayetteville, North Carolina, and it's like a tiny military town outside of Raleigh. And I like went out there and it was really fun actually, like going to visit and like meeting with, like I do my best customer was an indoor skydiving place, so I like to go there and like, do that and like meeting people face to face and like, doing those deals was really fun.  </p>
<p>00:10:19:29 - 00:10:49:06<br>Sean<br>And then I started to do the moved up from Fayetteville to Raleigh and then Charlotte, and then I started doing the Groupon getaways and I was doing I was like in charge of like the ski crew coupons, all the mountain stuff, all the resorts. And I found this one conference called the Mountain Travel Symposium. And I remember just pitching like the GM of the Groupon getaways.  </p>
<p>00:10:49:08 - 00:11:07:13<br>Sean<br>I was like, look, LivingSocial is they're they're like the headline sponsor. Like, we have no representation. We got to be there. Like and he's like, Well, I don't want to pay. I don't want to like, pay to be there, but like, I'll send you there if you want to go. I was like, okay, that's Squaw Valley. And I was like, This is sweet.  </p>
<p>00:11:07:19 - 00:11:26:16<br>Sean<br>I'm going to I'm going to get paid to go like ski for a week and like, meet all these. It was like a speed dating type of thing. And everyone's like skiers and stuff. And I, I there's a movie like my favorite ski movie. I think I probably told all the team about it called Na Na.  </p>
<p>00:11:26:17 - 00:11:27:20<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:11:27:22 - 00:11:46:21<br>Sean<br>And it's based on this book called Skyward. That's a NAS, like an acronym for Gaffney's Numerical Assessment of Redness. And he, Scott Gaffney and Rob Gaffney, they wrote this guidebook on how to attack the mountain and like.  </p>
<p>00:11:46:24 - 00:11:47:14<br>Marty<br>Get points.  </p>
<p>00:11:47:14 - 00:12:15:10<br>Sean<br>Points for certain lines, and then you get like extra credit points for doing shit, like going up, skiing up to a bunch of, like a stranger and saying like, Hey, I just want to let you know I'm the best rider on the mountain. Or like, I'm so much sicker than you. Like, I can't believe you're a pro. Just like, skiing naked, like, doing, like the more uncomfortable something made you feel, the more points it was worth And I think I was really I made everybody you like, watch that on the lacrosse team.  </p>
<p>00:12:15:11 - 00:12:16:09<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:12:16:11 - 00:12:27:28<br>Sean<br>I was like, this movie. It's how I live my life, how to do this. And, um, yeah, I. I had a hard time, like, keeping a desk job.  </p>
<p>00:12:28:02 - 00:12:43:05<br>Marty<br>Yeah, especially a group. Like. Like what happened to Groupon is it's still around. Like, I think Groupon maybe like one of the prototypical products of, like, zero interest rate policy companies. They just got a shit ton of money. Well, they were huge in Chicago when we were.  </p>
<p>00:12:43:06 - 00:13:11:16<br>Sean<br>So this was even this is way before zero interest rates. This was like for the longest time it was like, okay, we have like, I don't know, I felt like they really put, um, e-commerce and like email, like, okay, how do we, how do we figure out like what to do with, like social, like sharing and, and like emails and like deals and like, I don't know, I feel like Groupon was just the right place at the right time.  </p>
<p>00:13:11:16 - 00:13:36:25<br>Sean<br>And everyone figured out like, okay, if we can just get at Groupon deal, like we're going to get in front of so many people, we're going to drive so much traffic to our business. But it was ultimately like a lending platform because really these restaurants were like always strapped for cash and the best deals were like restaurant deals.  </p>
<p>00:13:36:25 - 00:13:58:24<br>Sean<br>And I'd be like, okay, you try to eat, call a restaurant. You say, okay, so what's your average ticket for for two people? And they'd say, Oh, it's $25. So you say, okay, we'll do a deal. $12 gets you $25 worth of food at, you know, your barbecue restaurant. You get $6 and we get $6. And that those rates aren't don't happen anymore.  </p>
<p>00:13:58:24 - 00:14:22:02<br>Sean<br>Or at least that's how it worked in the beginning. And so then they would sell like a thousand of these group bonds and so that's 6000 bucks and that's a 6000 bucks that they didn't have to do anything for. And then they get a check, you know, like 30 days later for 6000 bucks. But then they get like slammed business and like the whole staff is like, pissed off.  </p>
<p>00:14:22:02 - 00:14:31:01<br>Sean<br>The customers get pissed off and like, it's kind of a nightmare. But like, for a while it was like the hottest thing. It was like and it was like, really fun to work there.  </p>
<p>00:14:31:07 - 00:14:36:15<br>Marty<br>Like, I remember going to visit the Super Fund when some of our friends would work there. It was a campus.  </p>
<p>00:14:36:18 - 00:15:12:20<br>Sean<br>Every two weeks. There was like 60 people from like Big Ten schools that were just getting like, just graduated that were like rolling in and everyone's making like ten grand a month selling coupons. You know, It was like, crazy. It's great. And everyone's like, partying, like after work every night. Um, and like, you could see it was like instant gratification, you know, you'd like you call business, you do a deal, and then you in like seven days, it would be live on the Internet and then you just like, look at your deal, like after work on your phone, you just be like, you know, refreshing my deal.  </p>
<p>00:15:12:20 - 00:15:26:19<br>Sean<br>Like how much, you know, calculating your commission in your head, like, nice, nice, nice, like, kind of crazy, you know, thinking back and and thinking about, like, some of the businesses that just, like, got blown out. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:15:26:21 - 00:15:34:05<br>Marty<br>Is that not a viable business, Right? Like, imagine the restaurant sells at $5 for 12.  </p>
<p>00:15:34:08 - 00:15:40:28<br>Sean<br>Yeah. I mean, you can only do it like once a year or like, once very sparingly. But then, like, it's like a drug, like these restaurants.  </p>
<p>00:15:40:28 - 00:15:43:18  </p>
<p>Are like, Let's do it again. Run it again.  </p>
<p>00:15:43:21 - 00:15:46:06<br>Marty<br>Are they making money or are they losing money from this?  </p>
<p>00:15:46:08 - 00:15:57:11<br>Sean<br>It's not. It's like they're usually not making money, but it's like an advertising expense. Yeah, it's kind of how you have to I don't know. Think about it.  </p>
<p>00:15:57:13 - 00:15:59:18<br>Marty<br>Yeah. You're getting people in hoping they come back.  </p>
<p>00:15:59:21 - 00:16:15:26<br>Sean<br>Yeah, that's what that was one of our lines. When we call, we like, you know, Would you rather put up a billboard or. Or would you rather have them come in the door and try your food, you know, and let it speak for itself? You know, like, do you think you could get them to come back a second time?  </p>
<p>00:16:15:26 - 00:16:17:20<br>Sean<br>And they're always like, Yeah, oh yeah.  </p>
<p>00:16:17:22 - 00:16:22:01  </p>
<p>I can't get come back. It's like, I don't know. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:16:22:04 - 00:16:29:23<br>Marty<br>It's funny how that space has evolved now. It's all we think it's taken over Groupon of that.  </p>
<p>00:16:29:25 - 00:16:31:00<br>Sean<br>I don't know. I mean something.  </p>
<p>00:16:31:00 - 00:16:35:13<br>Marty<br>Like easy table. Easy table is I'm trying to think of the apps.  </p>
<p>00:16:35:15 - 00:16:42:09<br>Sean<br>I mean, I don't know any of these. I just do like Instacart.  </p>
<p>00:16:42:11 - 00:16:43:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:16:43:17 - 00:16:45:17<br>Sean<br>I like, never go out to eat.  </p>
<p>00:16:45:19 - 00:17:13:15<br>Marty<br>Well, that's the thing. That's like I mean, that's sort of what I wanted to dig into with you. Shawn good friend, founder of Salt of the Earth, which I've been using a lot of, and we've been talking a lot as you've been growing this business over the last six months. And I think having been your friend for shit almost a decade now, more than a decade now, 14 years now, 15 years on this crazy thing, I'm a decade out of college.  </p>
<p>00:17:13:17 - 00:17:23:24<br>Marty<br>It seems like you're really invigorated about, like starting your own business and leaning in and not only starting your own business, but something that sort of aligns with who you are today because you're not a party boy anymore.  </p>
<p>00:17:23:27 - 00:17:24:24  </p>
<p>No.  </p>
<p>00:17:24:27 - 00:17:26:12<br>Sean<br>No, no.  </p>
<p>00:17:26:14 - 00:17:28:28<br>Marty<br>You've really leaned into the health side of things.  </p>
<p>00:17:29:01 - 00:17:35:17<br>Sean<br>Yeah, man, I, uh. I'm almost like, seven years. Know, without a drink.  </p>
<p>00:17:35:20 - 00:17:39:05<br>Marty<br>How's that? How's that? What's. Why did you decide to start?  </p>
<p>00:17:39:08 - 00:18:04:21<br>Sean<br>Um, so it was on my 30th birthday or, like, right after my 30th birthday, I was, I was listening to this podcast of Tim Ferriss and Laird Hamilton. Mm hmm. And Tim Ferriss was like, So, Laird, if you could tell your 30 year old self like one piece of advice, like, what would it be? And Laird was like, Stop drinking alcohol.  </p>
<p>00:18:04:24 - 00:18:25:06<br>Sean<br>And I was just like, and Laird's like, you know, you know, Laird, he's like, this epic, like, big wave surfer. He's just like that. I stared and I was like, I want to be like, Laird, like it. I don't know. Something about the way he said it. And like, I was had been giving up alcohol for Lent for like six years.  </p>
<p>00:18:25:06 - 00:18:31:22<br>Sean<br>And it was always like something that I saw huge benefits from. I was like.  </p>
<p>00:18:31:22 - 00:18:33:29  </p>
<p>Wow, like my sleep's.  </p>
<p>00:18:34:01 - 00:18:44:19<br>Sean<br>Better. Like, I'm just like feeling better. It's just all these benefits. And then like also I remember my telling my grandmother, like, like and I was doing this. She's like, Why don't.  </p>
<p>00:18:44:19 - 00:18:49:07  </p>
<p>You just give up? Just stop. If you keep talking about how great it is, why don't you just stop, All right?  </p>
<p>00:18:49:09 - 00:18:58:06<br>Sean<br>Maybe. And then, like, she died and then, like, I don't know, a few weeks later, I heard Laird say that, and I was just like, Yeah, I'm like, Try it.  </p>
<p>00:18:58:06 - 00:19:01:01<br>Marty<br>Maybe that's insane. Do you miss it at all?  </p>
<p>00:19:01:04 - 00:19:03:10  </p>
<p>No, not really.  </p>
<p>00:19:03:12 - 00:19:13:00<br>Sean<br>Like, Oh, it's, uh. It's helped me a lot. Just, like, not drinking. Like, um.  </p>
<p>00:19:13:03 - 00:19:15:02<br>Marty<br>In what ways?  </p>
<p>00:19:15:04 - 00:19:38:02<br>Sean<br>I mean, really, Like this sleep was probably the biggest thing. Um, I mean, but then the, uh, the drugs didn't really stop after the after the drinking. I let that keep going for another, like, four or five months. And then I got, like, crazy, and then I was like, I got to stop everything.  </p>
<p>00:19:38:04 - 00:19:39:07  </p>
<p>Oh.  </p>
<p>00:19:39:09 - 00:19:41:14<br>Marty<br>So you've been completely sober for almost seven years.  </p>
<p>00:19:41:14 - 00:19:45:18<br>Sean<br>Yeah. Yeah. Pretty wild change.  </p>
<p>00:19:45:19 - 00:19:47:14<br>Marty<br>How crazy does it get?  </p>
<p>00:19:47:16 - 00:20:06:29<br>Sean<br>Like I want to share somehow on this podcast, the pictures that we have of, like, popping champagne bottles from like the championship days and like, I mean, I designed a shirt for our lacrosse team that was like it was like a PBR, DePaul, Blue Demons. I don't think I have the shirt anymore, but.  </p>
<p>00:20:06:29 - 00:20:08:03<br>Marty<br>Jeremy Shockey Sharkey's got once.  </p>
<p>00:20:08:03 - 00:20:15:29<br>Sean<br>He's got he's got one somewhere. Um, which is another kind of crazy story. Um.  </p>
<p>00:20:16:01 - 00:20:20:24<br>Marty<br>He became best friends with Jeremy Shockey for a short stint there. So talk to him at all.  </p>
<p>00:20:20:27 - 00:20:21:10  </p>
<p>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:20:21:17 - 00:21:02:20<br>Sean<br>I mean, every once in a while, um, so yeah, that was during the same time actually, that we were doing the coaching. And then I was like, helping out, helping you out with the coaching at DePaul. I went on vacation. Um, so at this company, Bright Tag, they're really flexing the, like, unlimited vacation policy. And I was like, I'm going to take two weeks and go to Vail and a December like Peace and like my brother was like Mountain Safety and Beaver Creek and he was living in this dorm style place called the Tarns.  </p>
<p>00:21:02:20 - 00:21:26:06<br>Sean<br>And it was like a like a college dorm. I mean, it was like a common room. This was like this big. And then four bedrooms attached and I was sleeping on the couch, but it was ski in, ski out. So I was like skiing a lot. And the second day in, I was getting kind of bored because they all had like, jobs and I could only ski with like my brother like half the day certain days.  </p>
<p>00:21:26:09 - 00:22:01:24<br>Sean<br>And so I found out that you could the private lessons were $1,000 a day. And I was like, I could do that. Like, I'm like better skier than this guy. And so I posted an ad on Craigslist saying, you know, I'll give free snowboard lessons, skiing or snowboarding lessons. Um, anywhere in like Summit County, like around. And so I'm getting hit up like crazy and I have like these two girls that want to go snowboarding.  </p>
<p>00:22:01:26 - 00:22:23:02<br>Sean<br>I've never given a lesson and I go to the bar that night and I it's Jeremy Shockey sits down right next to me and I was like, Whoa. Like, Sky's massive. And I was like, Can I get a, like, picture? And I'm like, just hanging with him. And he's like, and I'm wearing like, I have a little bit of gear, like, gear like, I'm wearing a hat that says, like, Beaver Creek.  </p>
<p>00:22:23:02 - 00:22:35:11<br>Sean<br>It kind of looks like I'm like, I work for the mountain a little bit. And he's like, What do you do? What are you doing here? And I was like, Yeah, well, I'm giving these two girls snowboarding lessons tomorrow.  </p>
<p>00:22:35:13 - 00:22:42:00  </p>
<p>And he's like, Dude, let's find these girls. He's like, He's like.  </p>
<p>00:22:42:02 - 00:23:02:29<br>Sean<br>Give me your number. And cause there's no girls in the mountain towns. It's like 8 to 1 ratio. So he's like, text me the next day. He's like, Oh, what are you guys doing? I was like, Hey, sorry. Like the next day the girls bail. They're like, hung over, not going to, not going to go skiing. And so Shockey was like, Well, all right, well, can you give me and my friend like lessons?  </p>
<p>00:23:03:01 - 00:23:32:02<br>Sean<br>I was like, Sure. I've never gotten a lesson before and like, I have a GoPro and he introduces me. This guy, this guy's name's Fred, and he's like in his fifties and he's like very beginner snowboarder. And he's like, Okay, so how does this work? Like you're like, free or what? And I was like, Look, I, um, it's it's known as pirate instruction on the mountain.  </p>
<p>00:23:32:04 - 00:23:52:11<br>Sean<br>Like, you get banned for life if you get caught doing this at Vail Resorts. I didn't know that at the time, but like they they'll, they'll try to throw a felony at you saying it's like theft of service from Vail Resorts. It's federal wildlife land like all this bullshit so you have to you can't like you can't even post that on Craigslist anymore.  </p>
<p>00:23:52:15 - 00:24:14:26<br>Sean<br>They they like scan it and they'll pull it down. But I was like, look, I'm not like, not really allowed to, like, charge you for a lesson, but like, if you want to give me a tip, you can, um, it's a thousand. Or you can go pay $1,000 to, to Vail. And like, I have a GoPro, I'm going to make a video.  </p>
<p>00:24:14:26 - 00:24:27:18<br>Sean<br>It's going to be, like, way sicker than whatever you're going to get from the get from that, you know, idiot. And he was like, okay, let's do it. And he just throws me like 500 bucks, cash like Fred right away slaps my hand. I was like.  </p>
<p>00:24:27:23 - 00:24:28:25  </p>
<p>All right.  </p>
<p>00:24:28:27 - 00:24:49:29<br>Sean<br>We're in business. And then like the next day he just does it again. He just, like, keeps doing it. And then I'm like, hanging out. It's like him and shock. And then after a week of doing that, they're like, okay, every time we come back and these guys are in Miami and they're like, every time we come back out to the mountain, like we're going to fly out from Chicago and you'll like, be our guy.  </p>
<p>00:24:50:02 - 00:24:50:28  </p>
<p>I was like, All right.  </p>
<p>00:24:51:00 - 00:25:13:25<br>Sean<br>Sweet. So like, that was like Christmas. I did that and then like, spring break, I did that, and then another Christmas, another spring break and then, you know, two Christmases. And then they were like, okay, like they offered me a job in, like, their family office in South Beach, and I moved down. 2014.  </p>
<p>00:25:13:27 - 00:25:14:21<br>Marty<br>You've been in Miami ever.  </p>
<p>00:25:14:21 - 00:25:16:04<br>Sean<br>Since? I've been there ever since.  </p>
<p>00:25:16:04 - 00:25:17:07<br>Marty<br>You like Miami?  </p>
<p>00:25:17:10 - 00:25:21:16<br>Sean<br>I do like it, yeah. Miami Beach. South Beach.  </p>
<p>00:25:21:18 - 00:25:23:28<br>Marty<br>I think it suits your needs better than Chicago.  </p>
<p>00:25:24:00 - 00:25:40:29<br>Sean<br>I mean, I did. Yeah, I was like I was living with my parents right before that. Like, I was, like, had lost. Eventually lost that job with Bright Tag now and they changed their name like, a bunch of times. But yeah, it was like.  </p>
<p>00:25:40:29 - 00:25:42:07<br>Marty<br>Taking too many vacations.  </p>
<p>00:25:42:13 - 00:25:43:23<br>Sean<br>It's probably yeah, they're just like.  </p>
<p>00:25:43:26 - 00:25:44:28  </p>
<p>Is this fucking guy.  </p>
<p>00:25:44:28 - 00:25:48:09<br>Sean<br>Like, thinks he's like a lacrosse coach and a snowboard instructor. Like, you got.  </p>
<p>00:25:48:09 - 00:25:52:28  </p>
<p>A job to do, buddy? Like, it's like I call us.  </p>
<p>00:25:52:28 - 00:26:17:02<br>Sean<br>Nobody cares about tag management. Also, at the time, I was trying to sell a technology for, like, a stupid amount of money, like $5,000 a month at Google had just came out. I was like Google tag manager and that was free. And everyone's like, Oh, you're going to take your call. So, uh, yeah.  </p>
<p>00:26:17:04 - 00:26:25:02<br>Marty<br>And again, it doesn't seem like you're, you're cut out to work for somebody, which is like.  </p>
<p>00:26:25:05 - 00:26:28:25<br>Sean<br>Believe me, I've tried. I, you know, I've tried.  </p>
<p>00:26:28:27 - 00:26:42:16<br>Marty<br>But I'm the same way. Yeah, I tried to quit many times, but it's that thing. It's that nagging thing. And you were like, Oh, I'm not liking this life short. Like, I got to go after something I want. It's.  </p>
<p>00:26:42:18 - 00:27:04:00<br>Sean<br>Yeah. So then after the family office thing, I, I got a job with Oxygen.com and that was like, I was like, okay, this is cool. This is like tech, this is real estate. And I was like, doing a lot of real estate stuff and tech stuff. And then I was just like, This is just getting kind of bored.  </p>
<p>00:27:04:00 - 00:27:09:22<br>Sean<br>And I, I went to this like coding boot camp. Then you do a design called.  </p>
<p>00:27:09:22 - 00:27:10:15<br>Marty<br>Design Boot Camp.  </p>
<p>00:27:10:15 - 00:27:34:01<br>Sean<br>Now see, I was like, I'm going to do that. I was like, I want to like, build something, you know, like and that was 2017 and like, right before that, like kind of, like during, in the middle of that, I was like, okay, I'm going to try to start a snowboarding, a plant based approach. I was like, really into I had just watched what the health and was like.  </p>
<p>00:27:34:04 - 00:27:37:00<br>Sean<br>I was like, okay, I'm going to try the vegan thing.  </p>
<p>00:27:37:00 - 00:27:38:09<br>Marty<br>Hardcore. Oh God.  </p>
<p>00:27:38:12 - 00:27:39:10<br>Sean<br>I went there.  </p>
<p>00:27:39:10 - 00:27:40:06<br>Marty<br>At some store for.  </p>
<p>00:27:40:06 - 00:27:42:10<br>Sean<br>Like a year. I was like, hardcore.  </p>
<p>00:27:42:11 - 00:27:43:28<br>Marty<br>How unhealthy did you get?  </p>
<p>00:27:44:01 - 00:27:57:24<br>Sean<br>I mean, I was training for an Ironman too, so and I was like, Oh, I'm, I'm, I'm following the ritual playbook, you know, like this guy did five Ironman in like five days. And to me that was like and he was like 50. And I was like.  </p>
<p>00:27:57:27 - 00:28:01:07<br>Marty<br>Okay, as a vegan, Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:28:01:09 - 00:28:23:06<br>Sean<br>But then like now there's guys like James Lawrence who did like 50 Ironman and 50 states in 50 days. He's done 100. He just did this thing that I call like he did like 100 Ironman in a row. This he's not vegan like these guys. I even met like other like crazy Ironman athletes. And I was like, Yeah, I'm doing like vegan thing.  </p>
<p>00:28:23:06 - 00:28:52:18<br>Sean<br>And they were like, Dude, what are you doing? Like, now? But I don't know. For some people it works. I tried it and I was like, maybe. And I wanted to create a product because I saw this girl. Her name is Michelle Lewin. She's like, O.G., Instagram fitness, fitness influencer. She's like, She was like the first one. She was in my lived in my building in South Beach, and I'd see her at the gym and I was like, Yeah, she's pretty fit.  </p>
<p>00:28:52:20 - 00:29:03:20<br>Sean<br>But like, she just made it look really easy, you know? Like she has probably like 50 million followers on Instagram now and like, she's, she launched some products and just like, blew up. And I.  </p>
<p>00:29:03:20 - 00:29:05:24  </p>
<p>Was like, Oh my God, like.  </p>
<p>00:29:05:27 - 00:29:17:14<br>Sean<br>This, Crazy. Like, you just needed, like, I don't know, be fair and, like, come up with a product and like, put it on Instagram and it'll sell. And you got to be like a hot girl.  </p>
<p>00:29:17:16 - 00:29:19:28<br>Marty<br>That helps. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:29:20:01 - 00:29:50:21<br>Sean<br>But then I was like, in South Beach, you know, trying to sell a snowboarding plant based, like high altitude training, protein powder, just like it just, like, didn't work. It wasn't. It just it just didn't work. And so then I was like, and it was all kind of falling apart while I was doing the coding boot camp. And so then I was like, okay, I'm gonna like try to get more like technical and like, learn more about, like how to build a company on my own.  </p>
<p>00:29:50:21 - 00:30:13:10<br>Sean<br>Like, I just, I want to build something and kind of got into like, uh, like the DevOps stuff like us and, uh, just like cloud architecture. And then, well, at a coding boot camp, I made a product I actually won, actually, you know, who's in my boot camp was Sam Abbasi.  </p>
<p>00:30:13:15 - 00:30:15:12<br>Marty<br>Mm hmm. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:30:15:14 - 00:30:16:29<br>Sean<br>Who's been on the podcast?  </p>
<p>00:30:17:03 - 00:30:21:29<br>Marty<br>On podcast. 1031 Portfolio company. Ho Second, they actually just made a big announcement today what it was.  </p>
<p>00:30:22:01 - 00:30:25:06<br>Sean<br>What's the deal? What's he what's he up to? I haven't talked to him in, like, forever.  </p>
<p>00:30:25:06 - 00:30:47:08<br>Marty<br>He found a company Husky, and there they essentially are creating a tool that allows you to validate that you own Bitcoin. And so they just announced this partnership with Bitwise, which launched one of the ETFs where like, oh, will help validate and do proof of reserves for them so that they can prove the ETF actually has the Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:30:47:10 - 00:30:54:26<br>Sean<br>Oh, so we had this competition at the end of the boot camp.  </p>
<p>00:30:54:28 - 00:30:57:02<br>Marty<br>I want was it your.  </p>
<p>00:30:57:04 - 00:31:21:00<br>Sean<br>It was it was called Cabbage Patch. It was the dollar cost averaging app. And um, it worked actually worked like I like was able to like, you know, scrap it together and like get it to work. And then I tried to actually, um, Sam and a his team actually tried to like buy me or like a figure out there, like, let's work together.  </p>
<p>00:31:21:00 - 00:31:48:29<br>Sean<br>And I was like, uh, I don't know, I'm going to try to sell this thing on my own. And I had this guy who started a company. He, he was like, had some he just sort of raised like, explain the explain the app. So the app is called Cabbage Patch, and it was it hooked up to your bank account and every after every year it would round up every purchase and then buy Bitcoin with the spare change.  </p>
<p>00:31:49:01 - 00:32:16:10<br>Sean<br>Um, so if you bought this coffee for, you know, any sense, it would round up to a dollar and it took that $0.20 invested in a bitcoin. The problem is if you're buying bitcoin at $0.20, the commission is like huge at the transaction. It was like doesn't really make sense to buy that much, that small amount, that small amount of bitcoin that frequently.  </p>
<p>00:32:16:13 - 00:32:39:07<br>Sean<br>So what it turning to was an app that just bought bitcoin. It would be like the way that the work around was like, okay, we're going to tally up your spare change at the end of the month. And it was usually around 20 bucks. And so that was, that was like the app. It was basically like 20 bucks on average, like you're going to buy every month and like on autopilot.  </p>
<p>00:32:39:13 - 00:32:46:00<br>Sean<br>Um, and yeah, a bunch of apps kind of came out at the same time doing the same thing.  </p>
<p>00:32:46:00 - 00:32:47:19<br>Marty<br>You can do that with Cash app now.  </p>
<p>00:32:47:21 - 00:32:48:20<br>Sean<br>You could do with Cash App.  </p>
<p>00:32:48:23 - 00:32:51:02  </p>
<p>At the time you couldn't do it with cash.  </p>
<p>00:32:51:02 - 00:32:53:04<br>Marty<br>And maybe planted the idea.  </p>
<p>00:32:53:04 - 00:33:07:23<br>Sean<br>And then I mean there's like there was, I wasn't the first one to have the idea there is there is a couple other out there like but there is there was a guy actually he had the best one that was called coin flash. I remember I remember just staring at his site.  </p>
<p>00:33:07:23 - 00:33:10:08  </p>
<p>And be like, Damn, this guy's so good.  </p>
<p>00:33:10:10 - 00:33:12:09<br>Marty<br>I was calling Flash.  </p>
<p>00:33:12:12 - 00:33:16:06<br>Sean<br>The same thing, but like he had you could buy like coins to buy.  </p>
<p>00:33:16:06 - 00:33:17:23<br>Marty<br>Etc.. It sounds terrible.  </p>
<p>00:33:17:25 - 00:33:30:20<br>Sean<br>You could be like he also was better with JavaScript and like, so the front end looked really slick. It was like a lot of a lot of toggles and moving parts. I was just like, Ooh, like, that's nice.  </p>
<p>00:33:30:22 - 00:33:40:27<br>Marty<br>We're like, I think I was saying this earlier. I think to Parker you were probably one of the only dudes at the part that listen to me. Back in the day, I was like, You guys should, like, maybe look into Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:33:41:00 - 00:33:43:10<br>Sean<br>Yeah, No, we were.  </p>
<p>00:33:43:13 - 00:33:44:02  </p>
<p>I think the.  </p>
<p>00:33:44:02 - 00:33:49:13<br>Sean<br>First time I heard about Bitcoin was, um.  </p>
<p>00:33:49:15 - 00:33:50:09  </p>
<p>I had.  </p>
<p>00:33:50:12 - 00:34:24:13<br>Sean<br>A couple of friends that had this other startup that had this one engineer from Notre Dame, and he was like, I just heard he was like, he just had bought like so much bitcoin. It was like this. And, and he, he was like, just like a dirty, nerdy, like, super nice guy, super brilliant guy. And I just kept hearing this story about how he, like, you know, hit it big and then lost it all, you know, like he got hacked or something.  </p>
<p>00:34:24:13 - 00:34:38:09  </p>
<p>It was like, Oh, like Joel, you have like 10 million Bitcoin and you just like and then he but then some version hacker took it all and then he moved to Africa or something. And I was like, Man, what is this Bitcoin?  </p>
<p>00:34:38:09 - 00:34:48:09<br>Sean<br>And then like, I remember you and me chatting about it, like probably, yeah, early on, just like in guys, like.  </p>
<p>00:34:48:11 - 00:34:51:13  </p>
<p>Like, are you following this stuff like this? It's like, pretty wild.  </p>
<p>00:34:51:16 - 00:35:03:02<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it was when I was working at a Dearborn, I forgot about chit chat. It was like you, my wife, and like two other people. I would g chat chats, and that's where I would like. And I was like, Dude.  </p>
<p>00:35:03:04 - 00:35:04:06<br>Sean<br>You should check this out.  </p>
<p>00:35:04:06 - 00:35:09:00  </p>
<p>Yeah, yeah. Oh, for sure. This is like, this is some big stuff here.  </p>
<p>00:35:09:02 - 00:35:12:13<br>Marty<br>What do you think about it now, ten years later?  </p>
<p>00:35:12:16 - 00:35:36:01<br>Sean<br>Yeah, it's like it's still, like, very legit. I mean, it's like, gotten, um. I personally, I feel like it's sometimes I get a little, like, depressed about bitcoin just because, like, for it to really, like, thrive. I feel like the world just kind of has to fall apart.  </p>
<p>00:35:36:02 - 00:35:37:09<br>Marty<br>I don't think so.  </p>
<p>00:35:37:11 - 00:35:46:08<br>Sean<br>Like, I feel like it's constantly like you're waiting for, like, like it's a lot of doom and gloom.  </p>
<p>00:35:46:10 - 00:35:57:22<br>Marty<br>There is a lot of doom and gloom, but I don't think like that necessarily needs to fall apart. I think the likelihood of the world falling apart is pretty high. It's not. Yeah, and that's why Bitcoin exists.  </p>
<p>00:35:57:27 - 00:36:12:07<br>Sean<br>Yeah. Like it's it's nice. It's it's great to have like I just think it's like amazing. It's great. But I feel like when I get really into it, like when I, when I see like, like the whole Twitter, like worlds, I'm just.  </p>
<p>00:36:12:07 - 00:36:19:12  </p>
<p>Like, oh, like that's so, like, dark sometimes. I mean, it's like, it's so like I.  </p>
<p>00:36:19:14 - 00:36:33:23<br>Sean<br>I don't know, I, I like, keep my distance like a healthy distance, but I'm still like, paying attention and like, seeing what's going on all the time. Yeah. Like I loved going to El Salvador, like Bitcoin Beach.  </p>
<p>00:36:33:26 - 00:36:36:09<br>Marty<br>And you went there, you go there with Athena.  </p>
<p>00:36:36:12 - 00:36:56:19<br>Sean<br>So I went there while I went there by myself. Um, I had brought my girlfriend at the time and I just wanted to, like, go surf there and, like, check it out. And then, and like, buying pupusas with, you know, like bitcoin and stuff and like, going to restaurants and, like, buying food with Bitcoin. I was like, This is awesome.  </p>
<p>00:36:56:20 - 00:37:18:04<br>Sean<br>I was like, This is like, real happening. I was like four years ago. Three, I don't know. Yeah, like three or four years ago, I was doing that and, and then I saw though, and I met like the strike guys down there and I really wanted a bitcoin beach t shirt like that was like, Oh, these are sick.  </p>
<p>00:37:18:09 - 00:37:27:07<br>Sean<br>And then as they're giving me one, they're like, Oh, you're in Miami, Can you give one to Mayor Suarez? I was like, like, I don't know the guy.  </p>
<p>00:37:27:09 - 00:37:28:25  </p>
<p>Like.  </p>
<p>00:37:28:27 - 00:37:43:23<br>Sean<br>And they're like, Dear, just take one and get, get it to him. I was like, okay. So then like when I landed, I deemed him and he like I was like, Hey, I got this shirt from Bitcoin Beach guys, can I, like, bring it over? And he was like, Yeah, come on. Tomorrow.  </p>
<p>00:37:43:25 - 00:37:46:08  </p>
<p>I was like, Oh.  </p>
<p>00:37:46:10 - 00:37:52:19<br>Sean<br>And then I was like, Is this actually him or is this? And he was like, Yeah, that's me. I was like.  </p>
<p>00:37:52:21 - 00:37:53:29<br>Marty<br>Where did you meet him?  </p>
<p>00:37:54:01 - 00:38:03:05<br>Sean<br>City Hall. He was there, dude. It was crazy because he the two buildings in Surfside had just gone down. I remember when I had.  </p>
<p>00:38:03:06 - 00:38:08:11<br>Marty<br>Oh yeah, I've got some theories on that one. Oh.  </p>
<p>00:38:08:14 - 00:38:09:04<br>Sean<br>Oh, yeah.  </p>
<p>00:38:09:04 - 00:38:12:21  </p>
<p>Let's yeah.  </p>
<p>00:38:12:23 - 00:38:29:09<br>Marty<br>There is a theory out there. So the theory for those buildings is that John McAfee's dead man switch was located. What was the theory out there? Have you heard this one, Luke? Now, there's a theory that John McAfee's dead man switch was located in that building. They had to take it down.  </p>
<p>00:38:29:12 - 00:38:33:18<br>Sean<br>So John McAfee is not just, like, alive somewhere like in the Caribbean.  </p>
<p>00:38:33:18 - 00:38:38:08<br>Marty<br>He may be, you know, his dead man switching to go off. Why not?  </p>
<p>00:38:38:11 - 00:38:41:19<br>Sean<br>What does a dead man's switch do or what is a dead man's switch?  </p>
<p>00:38:41:20 - 00:38:44:05<br>Marty<br>So if you're worried that the government or somebody is going to.  </p>
<p>00:38:44:07 - 00:38:45:00<br>Sean<br>Take you down, take.  </p>
<p>00:38:45:00 - 00:38:46:12<br>Marty<br>You down, you.  </p>
<p>00:38:46:15 - 00:38:48:06<br>Sean<br>You're going to take to put.  </p>
<p>00:38:48:06 - 00:39:00:19<br>Marty<br>Something. Yeah, you put something on a computer and you say, Hey, if I don't interact with this for X amount of time, like send the emails to the people or do something with the data. Uh.  </p>
<p>00:39:00:21 - 00:39:14:16<br>Sean<br>Uh, well, well, Suarez Just a theory. He was dealing. He was, he was in the middle of all that. He was like, he was in the middle of all that, and he was like, just swing by like 130.  </p>
<p>00:39:14:19 - 00:39:15:25  </p>
<p>It's like, okay.  </p>
<p>00:39:15:28 - 00:39:39:00<br>Sean<br>I like to show up. I was like, I got to get a picked ID, like, send it to the boys down in El Salvador. And he's like, he's wearing like fire department gear and he's holding up the Bitcoin beach shirt. I have like, it's a great pic. Um, but then I went back with Athena, so, you know, Matty is going horn.  </p>
<p>00:39:39:00 - 00:40:07:27<br>Sean<br>He's like the president now of Athena. He he was like, head of sales or the head of Latin America because they're like a Chicago based company. Yeah. Um, Bitcoin ATMs. Athena And he had, he was like, yeah. Oh, Bitcoin was becoming legal tender in El Salvador, September 7th, I remember. And it was like August, I was just there in May and August rolls around.  </p>
<p>00:40:07:27 - 00:40:13:08<br>Sean<br>I was like, Dude, like, this is cool. What's happening down there? You're like, They're a lot, right?  </p>
<p>00:40:13:08 - 00:40:16:06  </p>
<p>He's like, he's like, Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:40:16:08 - 00:40:29:28<br>Sean<br>I'm actually like part of the team to, like, help with the Chivo wallet and, like, get businesses down there, like, ready to go and like, he's like, I'm, I need so much help right now. He's like, Actually, can you come down and help me?  </p>
<p>00:40:30:00 - 00:40:32:10  </p>
<p>I was like, What? It's like, okay.  </p>
<p>00:40:32:12 - 00:40:35:15<br>Sean<br>It's like, can you get on a flight tomorrow? I was like, Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:40:35:17 - 00:40:37:14  </p>
<p>Let's go. I just.  </p>
<p>00:40:37:14 - 00:41:11:09<br>Sean<br>Like, show up and do this like Airbnb that they, they rent it out and it was like a war room. It was like it was like 12 dudes in this Airbnb and they had all these, like card readers that were like chievo wallet and like government sponsored and like, I have another picture that I'll send you. Logan This is like me at this desk, this table with like the whole, with, like this whole operation of, like people that were like, it was very it felt very cool.  </p>
<p>00:41:11:10 - 00:41:30:10<br>Sean<br>Like, very, like, pull it. I was in with, like the, the whole, like top dogs, like, okay, we're, we're making this happen with bitcoin. It's like we got to get Walmart to be able to accept Bitcoin here and like the McDonald's and like all the everything is going to have to accept bitcoin in four weeks. Like, are you ready?  </p>
<p>00:41:30:10 - 00:41:32:10<br>Sean<br>And I was like, Dude, what are you going to have me to even do?  </p>
<p>00:41:32:17 - 00:41:35:16  </p>
<p>I don't even know what's going on here.  </p>
<p>00:41:35:19 - 00:41:42:18<br>Sean<br>And they, they just I didn't really know. It was like it was just a madhouse. It was like, seriously mad.  </p>
<p>00:41:42:24 - 00:41:48:08<br>Marty<br>The fact that you were like, I didn't know this until about the fact that you're, like, in the room and all this is.  </p>
<p>00:41:48:14 - 00:41:54:27<br>Sean<br>Like, boo, like brother is like, running this shit. And he's like, walks in the room and, and like, Mitch, he is, is like.  </p>
<p>00:41:54:27 - 00:41:57:23  </p>
<p>Under the desk, like, no gel. Like.  </p>
<p>00:41:57:26 - 00:42:02:20<br>Sean<br>Like where? And there was like we were getting, like, escorted around and stuff and.  </p>
<p>00:42:02:27 - 00:42:03:21<br>Marty<br>What did you actually do.  </p>
<p>00:42:03:21 - 00:42:04:23  </p>
<p>So they, you know.  </p>
<p>00:42:04:25 - 00:42:22:24<br>Sean<br>So they wanted me to look like I was like part of the team. They were trying to, like, make their team look like bigger and like, smarter and like, American. I don't know. And like, Mathias was like, we'll figure something out for you to do. Like, maybe you can help us out with, like, the idea of as infrastructure or something, or like, we'll figure something out for you to do.  </p>
<p>00:42:22:26 - 00:42:38:07<br>Sean<br>And after like a day or two of just like, hanging out with them, I was like, I just I don't see what I'm going to do here. Like, I don't know how I'm going to be adding value. Like, this is like, you know, there's it was just kind of a wild, wild West.  </p>
<p>00:42:38:10 - 00:42:40:16  </p>
<p>And what was I do.  </p>
<p>00:42:40:16 - 00:42:42:22<br>Marty<br>This is some incredible insight into the rollout.  </p>
<p>00:42:42:22 - 00:42:43:24  </p>
<p>Of dude so.  </p>
<p>00:42:43:24 - 00:42:44:29<br>Marty<br>Oh, elated.  </p>
<p>00:42:45:01 - 00:42:49:17<br>Sean<br>So such incredible such incredible insight that I was like.  </p>
<p>00:42:49:19 - 00:42:53:07  </p>
<p>How can I how can I make money off this situation?  </p>
<p>00:42:53:09 - 00:43:06:02<br>Sean<br>I was like, Athena was trading on an exchange and the price of Athena was like $0.80.  </p>
<p>00:43:06:04 - 00:43:06:21<br>Marty<br>To.  </p>
<p>00:43:06:23 - 00:43:06:28  </p>
<p>Get.  </p>
<p>00:43:06:28 - 00:43:25:16<br>Sean<br>Myself in trouble. Yeah, no, I because I alt at all and nothing wrong happened. So I actually I was like because they were didn't know how they were going to pay me either. They're like, oh maybe we'll give you shares of the company. I was like, What does this company even worth? So I'm like looking at these filings and like trying to figure understand the business.  </p>
<p>00:43:25:16 - 00:43:26:13<br>Sean<br>And.  </p>
<p>00:43:26:15 - 00:43:30:13  </p>
<p>And then I was like, You know what? I'm going to buy.  </p>
<p>00:43:30:16 - 00:43:57:00<br>Sean<br>You know, I've been I've been known to option trade for my day. You know, my dad was a broker dealer at the Board of Trade, and I've just been into it. And I was like, yeah, I could buy some of these options on this. Athena stock that's, you know, $0.80. And I bought like $1,000 worth it. And and then I told I told Mathias I was like, Dude, I just like, I just bought some, some Athena stock.  </p>
<p>00:43:57:00 - 00:44:16:01<br>Sean<br>And he was like, he's like, yeah, like, I don't know if that's going to be like, doing it. Like, he was just like, yeah, I don't know about that, that move. And I was like, really like this guy. I was like he was, he talked me out. It he basically, like, made me think like, oh, this is a bad move.  </p>
<p>00:44:16:06 - 00:44:37:24<br>Sean<br>Like I'm and I was like, you know, I'm gonna cash out. I'm just going to get out of this the next day. It's someone leaks that like Athena's, it's on Twitter. Someone leaks like Athena's the one rolling out Chievo wallet in Bitcoin price shoots up to like $30. It would have been worth a lot. And I was just like, Fuck, man.  </p>
<p>00:44:37:24 - 00:44:43:18<br>Sean<br>I felt that was like my shot and yeah.  </p>
<p>00:44:43:20 - 00:44:46:04<br>Marty<br>Unfortunately you couldn't incriminate yourself because you sold.  </p>
<p>00:44:46:06 - 00:44:48:00<br>Sean<br>I did sell.  </p>
<p>00:44:48:02 - 00:44:48:23  </p>
<p>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:44:48:26 - 00:44:59:08<br>Marty<br>This is the the weird world of Sean McDonald. I just end up in these places next to Jeremy Shockey in the war room with Buckley's team as they're rolling out that coin.  </p>
<p>00:44:59:11 - 00:45:01:27<br>Sean<br>Yeah, that was. That was crazy.  </p>
<p>00:45:02:00 - 00:45:06:02<br>Marty<br>How do you how do you end up in these situations?  </p>
<p>00:45:06:04 - 00:45:17:16<br>Sean<br>Um, I don't know. I probably just following the curiosity. I feel like that's probably how I ended up there and just, like, willing to, like, kind of go for it.  </p>
<p>00:45:17:19 - 00:45:18:09<br>Marty<br>To send it.  </p>
<p>00:45:18:09 - 00:45:19:09<br>Sean<br>If you will. Yeah, just.  </p>
<p>00:45:19:13 - 00:45:20:07  </p>
<p>Just.  </p>
<p>00:45:20:10 - 00:45:23:03<br>Sean<br>Send it here.  </p>
<p>00:45:23:05 - 00:45:26:03<br>Marty<br>That I did not know that you never told me that story.  </p>
<p>00:45:26:05 - 00:45:46:12<br>Sean<br>Yeah, I'm almost positive I've told you that story. Like, I feel like there's more to it, too. I mean, I still keep in touch with those guys. Like, I shout out Carlos, this guy, he's like an attorney down there. And he was like, Dude, I sent him some salt of the earth. He, like, loves it. It's like, Oh, we got to get this down there.  </p>
<p>00:45:46:15 - 00:45:51:28<br>Sean<br>But like, shipping internationally is like, I don't know.  </p>
<p>00:45:52:00 - 00:46:04:21<br>Marty<br>Let's, let's dive into this, okay? Like, I love this shit to working a lot. It's funny, having known you for 15 years. Yeah, made me room is finally I only found his name here. What's been like starting this company?  </p>
<p>00:46:04:24 - 00:46:32:04<br>Sean<br>This has been super fun. I mean, um, so I have kind of always been into this. Like, I worked at the Gatorade Sports Science Institute in high school. It was like, across the street from high school. Barrington It's not there anymore, but it used to be one of their like hubs and so I would do these different, like lab tests and try new flavors and they would analyze my sweat.  </p>
<p>00:46:32:04 - 00:46:49:09<br>Sean<br>And it was kind of just like this weird, you know, side gig that I did for like ten years. It was like always like, hey, like I get an envelope in the mail. That's how or I'd get an email, actually, and they'd say like, Yeah, we got this new ten week study like, Are you available? It pays like 50 bucks an hour.  </p>
<p>00:46:49:09 - 00:47:20:00<br>Sean<br>I was like, always, like, Yeah, yeah, hell yeah. That train is always on time. And then I just was like, failing with my own, you know, with the protein powder and then like, just like, started to do e-commerce stuff the last year on Amazon and I was reselling other brands like I was reselling a lot of shoes, a lot of Nike, Adidas and Puma, New Balance.  </p>
<p>00:47:20:03 - 00:47:52:03<br>Sean<br>And I was like, Man, I want to just sell my own brand. The margins are so much better. And um, kind of went on this like this, like surf sabbatical all last year where I was like, you know, I had this video editing agency that I stumbled upon to where I met Ryan Breslau. He was like my I met him at this party, at this like hackathon party in my at Miami hack week and just like started talking to him and whatever.  </p>
<p>00:47:52:03 - 00:48:19:25<br>Sean<br>And then I like showed him a video that I made for a VC, Atomic Ventures that I was like, I don't know what I was doing. I just made this cool video. It was actually a video of pump and, um. ABRAMS Uh, Abraham, I forget the guy's name, Uh, but it was a video of pump actually, and I showed it to him and I was like, Yo, like, Ryan, do you know anyone that would, like, want videos like this?  </p>
<p>00:48:19:27 - 00:48:27:03<br>Sean<br>And he was like, me, I want these. Like, okay, like how many is like, a lot?  </p>
<p>00:48:27:06 - 00:48:29:07  </p>
<p>And I'm like, okay.  </p>
<p>00:48:29:07 - 00:48:46:10<br>Sean<br>And again, never had had no experience doing this at all. I was like, okay, well, we can go rent a studio just kind of like this. We just go rent a studio for like an hour and a half. And I would just like talk to him and ask him questions, kind of like a podcast, and he would just like, talk.  </p>
<p>00:48:46:10 - 00:49:05:12<br>Sean<br>And then I, I had a team in the Philippines that were just like, cut it up and animate it and then he would like, share it. And then after he started posting these, I started like getting more clients, like people that were just like, Y'all make those for me. And then, and that that was a business that was 0% interest.  </p>
<p>00:49:05:12 - 00:49:30:29<br>Sean<br>Like everybody had money for that. And then they didn't like I was like, Now this is like the price came way down. The air tools got way more advanced, like so like I had that business going with the shoes and then I was also selling offshore software development people because I just like knew how to code. I just like kind of sucked at it and I was like, I'm better at sales.  </p>
<p>00:49:30:29 - 00:49:52:09<br>Sean<br>I could just get these guys in India or South America or whoever and link them up with companies here in the U.S. and so, yeah, I just kind of like had all these different things going on. And then at the beginning of 2023, I was like, I started this like surf adventure. I was like, okay, I'm going to Costa Rica for a month.  </p>
<p>00:49:52:11 - 00:50:13:10<br>Sean<br>Uh, I'm getting ready to go to this place, the mental wise, in Indonesia. Have you ever, you know, the mental health? So I'm like, I booked this trip with four guys from University of Denver when I went there. Um, and these are like good snowboarders and friends and we all kind of picked up surfing later on and we had just put this trip in the books.  </p>
<p>00:50:13:10 - 00:50:35:14<br>Sean<br>It's kind of like one of those like destination, like bucket list surf trips. I was not prepared. Like I, my skill level was like not there. And so I was like, I'd spent a month in Costa Rica, surf every day. I, like had like this like coach that just like with, like scream at me and like, really, like, really push me hard.  </p>
<p>00:50:35:16 - 00:50:52:14<br>Sean<br>And then after that, I was like, Oh, I'm going to go to Nicaragua. And I actually linked up with Ryan O'Rourke. You remember him? Yeah, he's living. He was living in Santa Teresa. Another guy we played lacrosse with. He was living in Santa Teresa and he was like, Dude, I'm moving to Nicaragua.  </p>
<p>00:50:52:19 - 00:50:55:15  </p>
<p>I was like, Why? Because I got too crowded here.  </p>
<p>00:50:55:17 - 00:51:24:20<br>Sean<br>And it's too crowded. It's too expensive. Like, I want to go to Nicaragua. So then I went there for a month and I was in this place called Hacienda Iguana, which is like this bubble retirement community that has two world class waves. One's called panga drops and one's called Colorados, Colorado. This is like super famous wave that wasn't working the whole time that I was there, but I was still surfing, paying a drops every day.  </p>
<p>00:51:24:22 - 00:51:48:18<br>Sean<br>So then I go to. Then I go back to Miami. I'm still like doing the shoes thing, but it's just like, kind of like whatever it's like. And then I go to Portugal, surf in Eerie Sierra for a while, check out Nasri, meet up with one of my friends. Then we go to the mental wise, and once we're in the mental wise, it was like, I mean, amazing.  </p>
<p>00:51:48:18 - 00:52:14:12<br>Sean<br>Like heaven is like two weeks of just like we stay at this place called Awara Resort. And, you know, it is like it is like summer camp for adults. You know, you're you wake up at 6 a.m. and was awesome. It's like you're just like with your boys the whole time. You know, it's like you wake up at 6 a.m., have a coffee, and then you get in this boat and the boat takes you to these waves and like, perfect waves.  </p>
<p>00:52:14:14 - 00:52:26:09<br>Sean<br>And you're they're all by yourself with, like, you know, you're dudes and and you got, like, the music in the boat and it's kind of cool or whatever, and you just surf for, like, 3 hours till you're, like, dead. And then you get off, go back.  </p>
<p>00:52:26:12 - 00:52:27:10  </p>
<p>Eat.  </p>
<p>00:52:27:12 - 00:52:55:17<br>Sean<br>Go back, do it again for like ten days straight. You just did that. And it was like so it was like, amazing. And you're also eating like, really great food. And while that's happening, I'm like, kind of renting out my my studio in South Beach. The whole time. I had like kind of figured out I was listing my South Beach apartment and, uh, apartments dot com and I was like, getting people like and I was like, okay, yeah, like rent.  </p>
<p>00:52:55:19 - 00:53:16:12<br>Sean<br>I was just like, able to kind of, like, make it, like, swing it. And then when I was in mental wise, some girl was like, I want to book it for two months. I was like, okay, So she books it for two months and I was like, Where am I going to go? Like, And while I was there, everyone's like, You got to go to Bali.  </p>
<p>00:53:16:14 - 00:53:39:02<br>Sean<br>Like, we're here. It's like, close. Like, it's like, it's about to be peak season over there for surfing. Like you got to go. And so I was like, All right, I got to go. So then I find this spot in Bali. I book it like pay for the two months in advance, and then I get there and the girl flakes at the last second that was supposed to rent in spots.  </p>
<p>00:53:39:02 - 00:53:40:04  </p>
<p>I'm like, fuck.  </p>
<p>00:53:40:06 - 00:53:56:23<br>Sean<br>Like, I'm trying to get out of this now. I'm like and I can't get out of it. I can't get my money back. So I'm like, I just got to eat this and I'm going to stay and make the best of it. And so I'm like, I'm like, I need to start a new business. I'm like, I'm running out of money.  </p>
<p>00:53:56:23 - 00:54:30:07<br>Sean<br>I'm like, I got to start something new. And I was surfing super hard in the morning, like I'd wake up at like six, five, 36, surf for like 2 hours. And then I go to this place by training center. It was like, amazing. Just like, you know, like amazing, good looking people that are working out, sweating heavy. And then after that there's like a restaurant where everyone's, like, hanging out and then go to this place called Santo and there's like an amazing sauna ice bath.  </p>
<p>00:54:30:09 - 00:54:54:26<br>Sean<br>So I do that whole thing, that whole thing by 11 and I'd be done by like 11 and I'd be just dead, like, totally. And I'd be like, okay, try to like I'd go to this co-working space after and try to, like, get some work done on my businesses and stuff. And I just like, had no energy and I was like drinking caffeine and like drinking tons of water in lots of food and like, couldn't, couldn't wake up, like I couldn't get it going.  </p>
<p>00:54:54:26 - 00:55:17:08<br>Sean<br>And then I started to just like, add salt, just like pink Himalayan salt. And I was like waking up. And it just changed everything. Like I was totally a different person. I was able to just like, push through and recover and like, get up and just like, keep going. And so I was like, Man, I'm here. Like, I want to, like, make the best of every single day.  </p>
<p>00:55:17:11 - 00:55:55:02<br>Sean<br>I don't know if I'm ever to come back to this place like, I want to like, I want to surf every day, every morning, like I want to be out there. And, um, so that, yeah, it just like, helped me, like, get through it. And then I was like, I was there and I was like, talking to, you know, different suppliers and started to, like, visit them and like, tweak the formula and just like, really, like, get into it and like, working on, you know, working on the, uh, the packaging and the design and like, going back and forth with like different designers and like people in the Philippines that I knew that were like,  </p>
<p>00:55:55:05 - 00:56:18:16<br>Sean<br>you know, Sri Lanka, like all everyone was like, no one was, you know, I'm the only US based part of this brand really for now. But, um, yeah, I was just like really just hustling to, like, make it happen. And I was starting to take while I was in Bali, I was like, I'm going to start taking preorders.  </p>
<p>00:56:18:18 - 00:56:21:28<br>Sean<br>Like I have the formula kind of like, figured out like halfway.  </p>
<p>00:56:21:28 - 00:56:23:15<br>Marty<br>How did you come up with a formula?  </p>
<p>00:56:23:17 - 00:56:59:01<br>Sean<br>The formula was I wanted to, so I was like looking at Liquid Ivy and Element and I was kind of like, okay, these are like, these are the big boys. And first I was like, Okay, yeah. Liquid Ivy's definitely like the biggest boy. I mean, they, they that founder. I had kind of like, you know, admired his story, heard him talk about how he saw the product being developed, uh, or he saw like pro baseball players drinking Pedialyte and was like, this is kind of like, ridiculous.  </p>
<p>00:56:59:01 - 00:57:26:17<br>Sean<br>We should come up with something different. And, um, he, he just inspired me. And then, but I also really liked the element, guys. I was just like, these guys are. This seems like the more advanced way to do this. Like this. And then in just trying the different products myself, I was like, this is more the, the product that I think makes me feel the best.  </p>
<p>00:57:26:19 - 00:57:48:19<br>Sean<br>Um, like I feel like with Liquid Ivy, there's like all these, like B vitamins and like bunch of bullshit that just, like, doesn't really do anything. It's not like really going to make you feel that much better. Like, the salt is like, you could just do the salt, Like you could just buy pink Himalayan salt in the morning and like, not use this and like, yeah, you know, you'll, you'll feel it.  </p>
<p>00:57:48:21 - 00:57:52:01  </p>
<p>But it doesn't taste good. What does it do.  </p>
<p>00:57:52:04 - 00:58:14:06<br>Sean<br>The salt really like kind of like pushes water into your cells, like sodium, just like it's kind of like the simplest way I can like, explain it, but, um, yeah, I mean, it's really replacing also just replacing what you lose in sweat, you know, just like how Gatorade always sold it to you.  </p>
<p>00:58:14:08 - 00:58:18:23<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And they like because I've seen you do like the demos of like where you put the thing into.  </p>
<p>00:58:18:27 - 00:58:19:25<br>Sean<br>The metric meter.  </p>
<p>00:58:19:25 - 00:58:23:06<br>Marty<br>Yeah, the metric meter and that. So what's happening there.  </p>
<p>00:58:23:08 - 00:58:56:25<br>Sean<br>So that is a sensor. It's a piece of plastic that's like a straw that's held out by two copper wires and it measures the, the like strength of the charge between the two copper wires. And when there's a stronger electro, uh, like concentration, it's just like a stronger current. It's like, it's just like a stronger charge in your body.  </p>
<p>00:58:56:28 - 00:59:13:07<br>Sean<br>And when I so I saw a friend of mine actually had this metric meter Instagram video that he posted that, like, went super viral. And I was like, Oh, that's so smart. Where he's, like, grounding. He's like, has his feet on the ground.  </p>
<p>00:59:13:07 - 00:59:13:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah, yeah.  </p>
<p>00:59:14:02 - 00:59:32:21<br>Sean<br>And he's like, touching like a tree. And then he like, uses his and it's like, I was like, wow, that's like, like listening to someone talk about grounding is like, very, like hippie dippy. Like, I don't want to hear you, but like, when he pulled that thing out and you're, like, looking at numbers, you're like, Oh, this is like, legit.  </p>
<p>00:59:32:23 - 00:59:33:10<br>Sean<br>So I was like.  </p>
<p>00:59:33:10 - 00:59:36:06<br>Marty<br>I'm a big fan of of gravity. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:59:36:09 - 01:00:03:15<br>Sean<br>Me too. It's like, kind of weird to say, but like, it's totally legit. It's totally legit. I Mean, I love going out and like, I try to work out on the sand every day if I can. It's like it's the best and like, jump in the ocean. I feel like it's like the best. But when he showed that video, I was like, That is so powerful to like see some numbers, some measurement.  </p>
<p>01:00:03:18 - 01:00:13:13<br>Sean<br>And, you know, you hear you see there's so many comparison videos of like this is how much sugar our product has, this is how much sugar.  </p>
<p>01:00:13:13 - 01:00:14:22  </p>
<p>Our product has.  </p>
<p>01:00:14:22 - 01:00:25:04<br>Sean<br>You decide and it's like, show me something like, I don't know better than that. Like, that's like the Logan Paul movies and Logan Paul is like, this is.  </p>
<p>01:00:25:04 - 01:00:34:19  </p>
<p>How much Sugar Prime has, this is how much sugar everybody else gets. It's like, Shut up, their stuff sucks.  </p>
<p>01:00:34:22 - 01:00:37:17<br>Marty<br>You were telling me about what's wrong? A prime. It's got too much.  </p>
<p>01:00:37:19 - 01:01:01:15<br>Sean<br>It's all potassium. There's no sodium. It's like ten milligrams of sodium. And they're like, we have 800 milligrams electrolytes. Yeah, but like, 790 of them are potassium. And that's not like that's not hydrating you. It's not like helping you. Like you don't sweat potassium, like you sweat salt.  </p>
<p>01:01:01:17 - 01:01:04:17<br>Marty<br>So that's what salt of the earth this gets you The.  </p>
<p>01:01:04:25 - 01:01:08:00  </p>
<p>Salt get you the salt, baby. It's.  </p>
<p>01:01:08:03 - 01:01:09:18<br>Sean<br>Yeah, man.  </p>
<p>01:01:09:20 - 01:01:12:24<br>Marty<br>What's it been like getting this off the ground? It's been.  </p>
<p>01:01:12:27 - 01:01:13:07  </p>
<p>Dude.  </p>
<p>01:01:13:07 - 01:01:20:25<br>Sean<br>It's been. You know, I think Elon said this where he's like, you know, because I'll compare myself to Elon.  </p>
<p>01:01:20:27 - 01:01:24:03  </p>
<p>Uh, he's like.  </p>
<p>01:01:24:05 - 01:01:48:02<br>Sean<br>Entrepreneurship is like staring at a dark hole and, like, eating glass. You're just, I mean, like, I think it's just like, it's always like, uh, fear and euphoria, you know, like some days I'm just like, super high, like, Oh, my God, we just closed all these equinoxes and hotels, and then other days, I'm just like, How am I going to pay my rent?  </p>
<p>01:01:48:02 - 01:01:54:08<br>Sean<br>Like, what am I going to eat? Like, how is this going to work? So, you know, it's.  </p>
<p>01:01:54:10 - 01:02:07:27<br>Marty<br>Well, it seems like it's getting traction. Like that's it's been like I said, that's me first. Like, I'll, I'll try it out and it tastes like shit. And then I was at the gym. I usually take it after my workouts. I'm like, Oh, it does give you that burst of energy.  </p>
<p>01:02:07:29 - 01:02:25:00<br>Sean<br>I mean, I'll tell you, one of the highest I'll tell you the probably the highest I've ever gotten. Like pure euphoria feel was after you tweeted about it and seeing orders come in. I was I was just I was like, yes.  </p>
<p>01:02:25:02 - 01:02:31:29  </p>
<p>It was like ching, ching, ching, ching. You know, like, oh, my God. Oh, my gosh.  </p>
<p>01:02:32:01 - 01:02:34:11<br>Sean<br>Like adrenaline was like, going.  </p>
<p>01:02:34:14 - 01:02:43:13<br>Marty<br>Well, that's what we're talking about earlier. Like, how do you plan on like, something you had a good product and like, how do we scale it?  </p>
<p>01:02:43:16 - 01:02:49:29<br>Sean<br>You know, I think you just got to drink. And so to Ecom slash TFT.  </p>
<p>01:02:50:02 - 01:02:51:12  </p>
<p>Just hit that.  </p>
<p>01:02:51:12 - 01:03:07:25<br>Sean<br>But I don't know. I mean, I think I think I could bootstrap it pretty far. Yeah. Like, um, you know, that's, that's, it'd be nice to have this, this conversation in my head a.  </p>
<p>01:03:07:25 - 01:03:11:01  </p>
<p>Lot where it's like, yeah, just take the whole thing is.  </p>
<p>01:03:11:04 - 01:03:25:23<br>Sean<br>Bootstrap this baby. And then other times I'm like, nice to get like some investment and more people involved. But um, yeah, I don't know, just kind of going with the flow.  </p>
<p>01:03:25:25 - 01:03:34:27<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Yeah. I think you're writing a trend that I think people are really beginning to realize that, oh, maybe we should care about our health and do preventative health.  </p>
<p>01:03:34:29 - 01:03:35:11<br>Sean<br>Totally.  </p>
<p>01:03:35:14 - 01:03:37:17<br>Marty<br>Hydration is important as hydration important.  </p>
<p>01:03:37:19 - 01:03:37:28  </p>
<p>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:03:37:28 - 01:04:15:23<br>Sean<br>Then you know what's important is electrolytes. And, you know, you know this. I mean, first thing you do when you get into ERs, they hit you with the saline solution because you're probably dehydrated. Like 70% of the population is like chronically dehydrated. I mean, it makes it makes sense. I mean, a lot of times I've just noticed in myself, especially like with the fasting stuff, I've realized like, especially in the afternoon for some reason in the afternoon was when I would like, want to just like, eat snacks all, all afternoons.  </p>
<p>01:04:15:23 - 01:04:16:16  </p>
<p>I had snack.  </p>
<p>01:04:16:16 - 01:04:48:15<br>Sean<br>Time, like, let's just eat whatever. And I kind of realized it's like I'm not even hungry. I'm just like, bored. And I like just by like and then if I'm pref, I'm trying to replace that with water, then I'm just like, have to pee like, all the time. So then when I was like, Now if I just have one of these, I'm not, I'm not hungry, I'm just thirsty is what I've come to realize is that and I feel like that's probably the case with a lot of other people are they're not actually hungry, they're just thirsty.  </p>
<p>01:04:48:18 - 01:04:59:06<br>Sean<br>And it's kind of like disguised as like, Oh, I need to eat. But then like, I mean, you just in five days, no eating. It's like you can do it and like you feel actually pretty good.  </p>
<p>01:04:59:08 - 01:05:02:26<br>Marty<br>Like, yeah, I felt really good last Thursday.  </p>
<p>01:05:02:29 - 01:05:05:05<br>Sean<br>It's like, it's like amazing. Like at two.  </p>
<p>01:05:05:05 - 01:05:05:17<br>Marty<br>30 I.  </p>
<p>01:05:05:17 - 01:05:19:14<br>Sean<br>Was like, scared to do 72 hours because I was like, Oh my, I'm not going to be able to mentally function. I'm going to be like, But I was actually like really sharp, you know, you're kind of like on edge, like.  </p>
<p>01:05:19:16 - 01:05:28:01<br>Marty<br>At the end of day two, you're like, All right, I'm in a groove now. I'm like, used to being hungry. Hanger Hunger pangs go, yeah, yeah.  </p>
<p>01:05:28:03 - 01:05:55:11<br>Sean<br>But yeah, it's like, um, it's changed. Like how I think about fitness and endurance and just like, getting through the day because I think with the natural, like, circadian rhythm of most people, you're kind of like supposed to be kind of feeling like, tired around like 2:00, 3:00, you're kind of like, your body's kind of like, okay, it's time to like.  </p>
<p>01:05:55:18 - 01:06:16:00<br>Sean<br>But then you identify, like, have one of these like 2:00, which I usually do. I'm like, ready to go? I got like, I'm good. I'm like, I don't really need. And it's amazing that it's like also if you jerk in in the morning, like first thing in the morning, which I usually do, is like, sometimes I don't even feel like I need to have coffee.  </p>
<p>01:06:16:02 - 01:06:29:19<br>Sean<br>It's like I'm not actually tired, I'm just dehydrated. That's the other one is like, Wow. Cause I mean, I still love coffee, but I like, I, uh, I drink sad coffee.  </p>
<p>01:06:29:22 - 01:06:30:08<br>Marty<br>What's that?  </p>
<p>01:06:30:08 - 01:06:45:11<br>Sean<br>It's like, that's what my brother's wife calls it. Like, I'll just have a glass of whole milk and, like, instant coffee and, like, maple sirup, and I'll microwave it.  </p>
<p>01:06:45:13 - 01:06:48:10<br>Marty<br>That's disgusting. It's that I said.  </p>
<p>01:06:48:13 - 01:06:52:09  </p>
<p>It's got.  </p>
<p>01:06:52:11 - 01:07:02:20<br>Sean<br>But it's fast. Like, I'm just like, I don't want to, I don't know. I'm just like, lazy with the drip too. Or like, French press. I probably should just do one of those. But I'm just like.  </p>
<p>01:07:02:23 - 01:07:05:26<br>Marty<br>It takes 5 minutes for a pot of coffee. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:07:05:29 - 01:07:08:24<br>Sean<br>But now I've just. I've been drinking a lot of milk.  </p>
<p>01:07:08:26 - 01:07:09:16<br>Marty<br>Raw milk.  </p>
<p>01:07:09:16 - 01:07:10:11<br>Sean<br>I wish I.  </p>
<p>01:07:10:15 - 01:07:11:00<br>Marty<br>The raw milk.  </p>
<p>01:07:11:01 - 01:07:14:13<br>Sean<br>I want to get on the raw milk, but I've just been doing the whole.  </p>
<p>01:07:14:15 - 01:07:17:23<br>Marty<br>Whole milk at the raw milk. So a big upgrade.  </p>
<p>01:07:17:24 - 01:07:18:17<br>Sean<br>You get it.  </p>
<p>01:07:18:19 - 01:07:32:12<br>Marty<br>Yeah. They sell it here in Austin. That's how I broke my sensitive, raw milk. Three raw eggs and raw eggs. Yeah. Roll raw eggs. I'm going to Texas to get a southern draw.  </p>
<p>01:07:32:14 - 01:07:34:19<br>Sean<br>And you get the cowboy boots.  </p>
<p>01:07:34:22 - 01:07:57:14<br>Marty<br>And you get the cowboy boots. I need a hat from a deep eddy cabaret, especially a northerner in Texas. Is this. Is this the look of somebody who was transplanted here? Logan All right, drink. So to Taco Slushy, if you want to. 50% off.  </p>
<p>01:07:57:19 - 01:08:01:19<br>Sean<br>Yeah, definitely do that. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:08:01:22 - 01:08:04:06<br>Marty<br>Anything else we should tell the freaks.  </p>
<p>01:08:04:08 - 01:08:07:20<br>Sean<br>Oh, just talk about, uh, Jack Dorsey story. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:08:07:23 - 01:08:09:29<br>Marty<br>I think we can end it with the Jack Dorsey story.  </p>
<p>01:08:10:05 - 01:08:31:12<br>Sean<br>All right, So last year, I started that, you know, a surf sabbatical, and I was in Costa Rica, and I. I sat down at dinner, and. And I caught him. I see him at the table next to me, and I'm like, I'm like, looking across the table in my body.  </p>
<p>01:08:31:12 - 01:08:39:24  </p>
<p>I was like, Y'all, that's Jack Dorsey. He's what's it like, 11, That girl. Oh, my God. Smoke.  </p>
<p>01:08:39:27 - 01:09:02:27<br>Sean<br>And And then, like, nothing happens, Whatever. But then the next day I see him again at this reggae club. I think this place actually down. But like, the whole town goes to this, this reggae club. And so I like, go in and I see him and I was like, with this girl. And I was like.  </p>
<p>01:09:02:28 - 01:09:04:12  </p>
<p>Oh my God, he's.  </p>
<p>01:09:04:15 - 01:09:21:11<br>Sean<br>And he had like a bunch of cute girls around and like, he had, like, security and he was by like, the exit, you know, he was like, he had his own, like entrance and exit that he, there was like private little corner. And I was like, oh, man, I want to like, just say, What's up to this guy?  </p>
<p>01:09:21:13 - 01:09:32:08<br>Sean<br>Like, I but I don't want to be like, I don't want to be that meme of the guy that's like screaming into the girl's ear, like trying to, like, say, like, yo, like.  </p>
<p>01:09:32:10 - 01:09:34:04<br>Marty<br>There's only 21 million Bitcoin. You got to be.  </p>
<p>01:09:34:04 - 01:09:35:29  </p>
<p>Like, What's up, dude? You know.  </p>
<p>01:09:36:01 - 01:09:56:26<br>Sean<br>I just I didn't know. I didn't want to, like, do that. It was so loud. So I'm like, How am I even going to talk to this guy? It's like, so fucking loud. And, and so then I'm like, I'm like dancing, like, girl. I'm like, having a good time. I'm like, kind of, like forgetting about it. And then, like, so at some point, she, like, drags me, like, closer to him.  </p>
<p>01:09:56:26 - 01:10:18:04<br>Sean<br>And then at one point I'm like, you know, arm's length away. And I was just like, I got to like, say, What's up? Like, I got to say something and I'm like, thinking of myself. Like, what the hell am I going to say to this guy? And I just like, I just kind of like, leaned in. And at one point I was like, Yo, Jack, love what you're doing for Bitcoin, man.  </p>
<p>01:10:18:06 - 01:10:20:00<br>Sean<br>And he just.  </p>
<p>01:10:20:03 - 01:10:22:19  </p>
<p>He was like, Yo, thank you, thank you.  </p>
<p>01:10:22:22 - 01:10:24:23<br>Sean<br>I appreciate that. He was like.  </p>
<p>01:10:24:26 - 01:10:30:16  </p>
<p>Well, what's your name? Like, I'm Sean. He's like, I'm Jack. I was like, Yeah. I was like.  </p>
<p>01:10:30:19 - 01:10:59:24<br>Sean<br>Um, and then like, right after that, he just kind of like he, he like, looked at, like his, like security and like bouncers and just kind of gave him, like, a nod, like, Yo, this guys, this guy's fine. Like, don't fucking kill this guy. And the rest of the night, we're just like, you know, like, shoulder to shoulder, like, he just kind of, like, welcomes me into his, like, circle of of, like, hot babes and, like, we're just, like, shoulder to shoulder dancing like the rest of the night.  </p>
<p>01:10:59:24 - 01:11:10:19<br>Sean<br>It was, like, so awesome. And, uh, yeah, that was it. I didn't get a picture or nothing. I was just like, You got a good story. I got a great story. And it was a great memory. Yeah. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:11:10:22 - 01:11:36:27<br>Marty<br>Do you live a wildlife, sir? It's funny, coming from your basement apartment in Chicago to, uh, bumping elbows with Jack Dorsey, The this story might be the funniest thing. The fact that you were in the war room in Venezuela the week before the El Salvador. El Salvador, um, before they launched the, uh, the Bitcoin law. Yeah. The fact that you were in that room, my mind.  </p>
<p>01:11:36:27 - 01:11:38:03<br>Marty<br>But I'm happy you were.  </p>
<p>01:11:38:05 - 01:11:41:08<br>Sean<br>Yeah. I don't know what I was doing. I got the picture to prove that you had a lot of stories.  </p>
<p>01:11:41:08 - 01:11:47:29<br>Marty<br>Jeremy Shockey, Athena, Jack Dorsey, Bailey starting a electrolytes company.  </p>
<p>01:11:48:01 - 01:11:49:08<br>Sean<br>Yeah. For the freaks.  </p>
<p>01:11:49:10 - 01:11:56:02<br>Marty<br>For the freaks? Yeah. Some of the earth for the freaks. Drinks, dotcom, slash the FTC peace of love receptacle, liquor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[Scrib]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/launching-bitcoin-in-el-salvador/">Read original post</a></p>
<h1>Key Takeaways</h1>
<p>This episode of TFTC with Marty and Sean McDonnell covered a range of personal experiences, business insights, and the intersection of technology, health, and sports. The conversation delved into various topics, including their past in sports, particularly lacrosse, entrepreneurship, health and wellness, and the importance of Bitcoin in today’s economy.</p>
<h2>Lacrosse Memories</h2>
<p>Marty and Sean reminisced about their lacrosse days, sharing a story from Marty's last game and the severe concussion he suffered. This incident marked a turning point in his life, leading him away from sports and towards economics and eventually Bitcoin.</p>
<h2>Entrepreneurship and Business</h2>
<p>The episode touched upon their respective entrepreneurial journeys, with Sean discussing his involvement in a range of ventures, from selling shoes to video editing for influencers. His most recent venture is Salt of the Earth, an electrolyte company that aims to address chronic dehydration.</p>
<h2>Health and Wellness</h2>
<p>Sean shared his personal story of giving up alcohol and noted the benefits of improved sleep and overall health. His journey into wellness influenced the creation of Salt of the Earth, driven by his understanding of the importance of hydration and electrolytes.</p>
<h2>Bitcoin and Technology</h2>
<p>The conversation included insights into the crypto space, with Sean recounting his involvement in the rollout of Bitcoin as legal tender in El Salvador. He also recounted his own realization of the significance of Bitcoin over the years and its potential impact on the global economy.</p>
<h2>Sponsors</h2>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h1>Best Quotes</h1>
<ul>
<li>"I couldn't articulate the letters of my name. I could see it, but after that hit, I just couldn't spell it out."</li>
<li>"Being dehydrated feels a lot like being hungry. Sometimes you're not hungry; you're just thirsty."</li>
<li>"Starting your own business is like staring into a dark abyss while eating glass, but when you see things start to take off, it’s pure euphoria."</li>
<li>"When I shared Salt of the Earth with Marty, and he tweeted about it, orders started coming in non-stop. It was one of the highest moments I've experienced."</li>
</ul>
<h1>Conclusion</h1>
<p>The episode painted a vivid picture of the challenges and triumphs of entrepreneurship, the importance of health and wellness, and the revolutionary potential of Bitcoin. Sean's journey from a lacrosse player to a tech entrepreneur and health enthusiast was a testament to the power of personal transformation and the pursuit of passion. The discussion on Bitcoin's role in El Salvador demonstrated the real-world applications of cryptocurrency and the evolving landscape of digital finance. This conversation was a blend of nostalgia, innovation, and forward-thinking, reflecting the varied interests and experiences of the hosts and their guest.</p>
<h1>Timestamps</h1>
<p><strong>Timestamps:</strong><br>0:00 - Intro<br>6:32 - Lacrosse<br>15:59 - Groupon<br>23:23 - Giving up the party life<br>27:11 - Skiing story<br>32:51 - Coding bootcamp<br>38:06 - Bitcoin<br>43:01 - Bukele’s war room<br>52:24 - Starting Salt of the Earth<br>1:02:50 - Electrolytes<br>1:14:24 - Jack Dorsey story</p>
<h1>Transcript</h1>
<p>00:00:00:00 - 00:00:02:05<br>Sean<br>Come. You don't talk about owls Lacrosse anymore.  </p>
<p>00:00:02:07 - 00:00:03:15<br>Marty<br>Owls. Lacrosse.  </p>
<p>00:00:03:18 - 00:00:04:15  </p>
<p>Owls. Lacrosse.  </p>
<p>00:00:04:15 - 00:00:06:16<br>Marty<br>Still big fan of owls. Lacrosse.  </p>
<p>00:00:06:18 - 00:00:11:28  </p>
<p>Shout out to Sam, Sam and a lot of owls. Lacrosse.  </p>
<p>00:00:12:05 - 00:00:23:25<br>Marty<br>Unfortunately a cash up. Not unfortunately, just where the business cash app is in. Sponsor That was a that was a deal we did with Cash app where people would sign up.  </p>
<p>00:00:23:28 - 00:00:25:27<br>Sean<br>On your just given the like referral to.  </p>
<p>00:00:25:27 - 00:00:28:18<br>Marty<br>Them. I think so yeah.  </p>
<p>00:00:28:20 - 00:00:32:02<br>Sean<br>Yeah they seem to be doing great.  </p>
<p>00:00:32:04 - 00:00:49:04<br>Marty<br>Sam's crushing it. I talked to him I think like six months ago. It's funny, one of the girls, um, women who works here in the comments was friends with him growing up, and we somehow stumbled. I think I was talking about owls Lacrosse. She's like, you know, Sam It's like, Yeah. And it's a.  </p>
<p>00:00:49:06 - 00:01:01:27<br>Sean<br>So the girl out there, Julia, said she, like, got the job because of her brother was a listener of you. Do you know who her brother is?  </p>
<p>00:01:02:03 - 00:01:08:18<br>Marty<br>I don't know. There's a lot of listeners out there, so we've come a long way from the Deep Lakes days to.  </p>
<p>00:01:08:21 - 00:01:22:00<br>Sean<br>Yeah, well, I was done playing 2010 and that was Dude, how about we tell the story of your last game? Just your last game, right?  </p>
<p>00:01:22:02 - 00:01:25:07<br>Marty<br>Last game. Ever hung up. Hung up the cleats after.  </p>
<p>00:01:25:07 - 00:01:30:06<br>Sean<br>That was all right. You want to, like, tell your side of the story and then I'll I'll fill it in here.  </p>
<p>00:01:30:06 - 00:01:31:03<br>Marty<br>We're playing Augustana.  </p>
<p>00:01:31:09 - 00:01:32:03<br>Sean<br>Augustana.  </p>
<p>00:01:32:04 - 00:01:36:25<br>Marty<br>Augustana. We're in Rock Island, Illinois, on the border of Illinois and Iowa.  </p>
<p>00:01:36:25 - 00:01:41:06<br>Sean<br>This is 2010. Must have been there in 2009, 2010, 2010.  </p>
<p>00:01:41:09 - 00:01:57:21<br>Marty<br>We were on the back end of a road trip. We had gone down to like Saint Louis and made our way back up to Rock Island, right? Yeah. And we're playing in the middle of nowhere, tired. I think it was our third game that weekend. I think we were in Indianapolis and Missouri.  </p>
<p>00:01:57:22 - 00:01:59:01<br>Sean<br>Horse scheduling just.  </p>
<p>00:01:59:01 - 00:02:19:12<br>Marty<br>Like, and then up to Iowa. Yeah, I decided I want to play long stick. I don't want to play close defense. I wanted to play Moody. So I grabbed a stick and then Pat Desmond, who I saw crying on Instagram because the Detroit Lions won a playoff game for the first time in 30 years the other day.  </p>
<p>00:02:19:12 - 00:02:22:05<br>Sean<br>How did I miss that thing? Oh, he.  </p>
<p>00:02:22:07 - 00:02:41:27<br>Marty<br>He threw me. So in lacrosse, when the goalie saves the ball and you break out to start the transition, you're looking for the ball over your shoulder, looking back at the goalie and the goalie supposed to throw you a tight a type of right to your stick because there's defenders out there that could hit you. Desmond threw me.  </p>
<p>00:02:41:27 - 00:02:42:06<br>Marty<br>What?  </p>
<p>00:02:42:09 - 00:02:49:04<br>Sean<br>I mean, he shouldn't. And she shouldn't even looked. She shouldn't even looked. You're right in the middle of the field.  </p>
<p>00:02:49:06 - 00:02:49:20<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:02:49:27 - 00:03:07:17<br>Sean<br>Like, definitely, you know, go to the outside. And I mean, you just do one of these over your shoulder. And it was just body parts like nice lob hits your stick. And it was just like that.  </p>
<p>00:03:07:22 - 00:03:13:03<br>Marty<br>Sun had to be like 65, £250. Hit me straight in the chest. I mean, I don't remember any of it.  </p>
<p>00:03:13:06 - 00:03:22:27<br>Sean<br>And like, you just hit the ground so hard. It was like a big duffel bag just got dropped from like a ten story building. That's how it sounded.  </p>
<p>00:03:23:00 - 00:03:24:15<br>Marty<br>And I got knocked out for.  </p>
<p>00:03:24:17 - 00:03:31:27<br>Sean<br>You, got up, like, right away and you came and you came out of the side. And I remember being like.  </p>
<p>00:03:32:00 - 00:03:32:29  </p>
<p>I was like, Hey, I'm out.  </p>
<p>00:03:33:00 - 00:03:53:28<br>Sean<br>He really got his bell rung and I was like, Okay. But like, I was trying to keep pushing you to, like, go back. I was like, Yeah. And I'm like, we just need to, you know, get some momentum on offense and get it going. And you were like, ready to go back out. And Tim, this is another carrier.  </p>
<p>00:03:54:00 - 00:04:15:12<br>Sean<br>Tim Carrier was like, we were so ragtag that it was like always a player coach. Tim was senior and he was the head coach and he was like, Dude, he's not going back. He's not going back up. And you're like, Ready to go? And then he goes, He's like, Steak, what? What day is it? And you're just like.  </p>
<p>00:04:15:14 - 00:04:18:00  </p>
<p>Oh, fuck, Dad.  </p>
<p>00:04:18:00 - 00:04:20:18<br>Marty<br>No, it was I got to tell her to piss myself.  </p>
<p>00:04:20:19 - 00:04:28:14<br>Sean<br>That was scary. And that sooner, like I got to take him to the hospital and drove you to the hospital.  </p>
<p>00:04:28:14 - 00:04:34:20<br>Marty<br>And I know an ambulance showed up. I went in the ambulance because I remember they put an I.V. and me in the ambulance.  </p>
<p>00:04:34:24 - 00:04:47:27<br>Sean<br>So I went in the ambulance with you and had to call your mom because I was the president. And, um, man, that was that sucked. Like.  </p>
<p>00:04:48:00 - 00:04:48:14<br>Marty<br>Know I remember.  </p>
<p>00:04:48:15 - 00:04:52:16<br>Sean<br>And you're like, this is like, I was like, have you had a concussion before?  </p>
<p>00:04:52:16 - 00:04:56:12  </p>
<p>And you're like, Yeah, it's like my seventh one or something.  </p>
<p>00:04:56:12 - 00:05:21:26<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it was my sixth. Pretty bad concussion. I remember coming to in the, uh, in the middle of Rock Island, Illinois, the middle of nowhere, like waiting in the waiting room for a doctor to see me. And I come to, like, I think I'd come out of the. The fog I was in after being hit, and I, like, come to the first thing I see is this, like, dude with, like, a bald head and he's got a tattoo of the middle finger on the back of his head.  </p>
<p>00:05:21:26 - 00:05:24:27<br>Marty<br>I was like, Where the fuck am I? What am I doing here?  </p>
<p>00:05:24:27 - 00:05:26:14<br>Sean<br>Get over Rock Island.  </p>
<p>00:05:26:16 - 00:05:39:26<br>Marty<br>And then you. I think it was ghetto. And Reed waited, and we drove back to Chicago through the middle of the night. And I was fucked up for, like, two weeks.  </p>
<p>00:05:39:28 - 00:05:56:17<br>Sean<br>Yeah, I mean, that's. That was, that was. And that was scary. I remember just being like, I couldn't believe I felt so guilty that I was like, I wanted you to just keep playing, like, Dude, come on, let's go. And Tim, when he called you out on the date, I was like, Wow, that's I guess that's how, you know.  </p>
<p>00:05:56:20 - 00:06:13:29<br>Marty<br>I couldn't even spell my name. And I think it's weird because I have like, these. I remember Tim asked me that and I didn't know I didn't know what day was. And I remember asking me to spell my name and I could see my name and my brain, but I couldn't like, articulate the letters. I was like, that.  </p>
<p>00:06:14:02 - 00:06:15:02<br>Marty<br>Here we are, though.  </p>
<p>00:06:15:04 - 00:06:17:19<br>Sean<br>I mean, you've come a long way. Yeah, come a long way.  </p>
<p>00:06:17:19 - 00:06:19:03<br>Marty<br>I became that player, coach.  </p>
<p>00:06:19:06 - 00:06:19:27<br>Sean<br>And after.  </p>
<p>00:06:19:28 - 00:06:21:21<br>Marty<br>I got knocked out, I started coaching my sophomore.  </p>
<p>00:06:21:21 - 00:06:28:00<br>Sean<br>Year. Then that was. Yeah, sophomore year. How did you guys do sophomore and junior year?  </p>
<p>00:06:28:03 - 00:06:36:10<br>Marty<br>The we kept getting progressively better. Sophomore year was the worst, but the junior and senior year we did well obviously the senior year and then with the ship.  </p>
<p>00:06:36:12 - 00:06:42:23<br>Sean<br>And you didn't have any other coach sophomore year or junior that.  </p>
<p>00:06:42:26 - 00:06:48:15<br>Marty<br>Kolber was the name. He was terrible and he tried to he tried to be like the head coach.  </p>
<p>00:06:48:18 - 00:06:51:16<br>Sean<br>I think we're probably going to get some deep wax guys listening to this.  </p>
<p>00:06:51:19 - 00:06:53:21  </p>
<p>Hopefully, right?  </p>
<p>00:06:53:23 - 00:07:18:09<br>Marty<br>I would imagine. But no, it's weird thinking that because that that was like 2010 I got knocked out, couldn't play lacrosse and went complete sports anymore. Stuff like basketball at 3 a.m.. And that's like sort of what sent me down the path to Bitcoin. I was like, I can't play sports anymore. Only focus on economics and all the shit and fell down the Bitcoin rabbit only two and a half years later.  </p>
<p>00:07:18:11 - 00:07:23:23<br>Sean<br>Yeah. In 2013 was the championship season.  </p>
<p>00:07:23:24 - 00:07:24:07<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:07:24:11 - 00:07:27:20<br>Sean<br>When your boy showed up as an assistant assistant coach.  </p>
<p>00:07:27:25 - 00:07:35:25<br>Marty<br>Yes. Thank you. From the from the mean streets, the GrubHub coming in to a Groupon. Groupon, not GrubHub.  </p>
<p>00:07:35:28 - 00:07:59:09<br>Sean<br>And I wasn't even a hacker. But at the time I was at this other company called Bright Tag, and I was not enjoying my job. And I just remember being like, This is sweet. Like this team is like winning and like, and then going down and winning the conference championship. Great Rivers Conference. Yes.  </p>
<p>00:07:59:09 - 00:08:00:12<br>Marty<br>Yeah, yeah.  </p>
<p>00:08:00:12 - 00:08:25:02<br>Sean<br>I'll see. And then go into the national championship tournament. That was like so fun to just like because when I was playing, it was like the first year we were killing it. We had all these Brother Rice guys. We were like smoke in the league. And then we got moved up into like a legit league conference and then we were just getting our asses kicked by like Wheaton and like, because we were just like, partying a lot.  </p>
<p>00:08:25:02 - 00:08:48:18<br>Sean<br>And like, these guys are all sober, just working us. But like, we had kids from Brother Rice, you know, like the best school in the Midwest. But yeah, that was so fun. Like seeing a team that you built pretty much from like the freshman year. It's like sophomore year and then coach, like, win the championship. That was like, it was awesome.  </p>
<p>00:08:48:24 - 00:09:11:05<br>Marty<br>All it took was a little structure. All I did was add six, eight workouts in the offseason and two practices a week in season. We just had camaraderie and a bit of structure and actually obviously playing lacrosse in the Northeast allows you to know the game pretty well. I knew how to organize a defense, I handle the defense, and there were some players on the team that could put together an offense.  </p>
<p>00:09:11:05 - 00:09:15:20<br>Marty<br>It's like you guys focus on offense and make the defense as good.  </p>
<p>00:09:15:22 - 00:09:22:12<br>Sean<br>Yeah, I didn't even really like trying to do any Xs and I was I was like, just trying to hype everyone up like.  </p>
<p>00:09:22:14 - 00:09:27:19  </p>
<p>Like just fucking kick the shit out of these guys. Let's go.  </p>
<p>00:09:27:21 - 00:09:29:10<br>Marty<br>But we've come a long way since then.  </p>
<p>00:09:29:14 - 00:09:30:14<br>Sean<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:09:30:17 - 00:09:34:06<br>Marty<br>Like you said, you're a ten year long at someone.  </p>
<p>00:09:34:08 - 00:09:35:14<br>Sean<br>And bright tag, right?  </p>
<p>00:09:35:14 - 00:09:42:08<br>Marty<br>Tag You don't seem like somebody likes being chained to a desk or working for a company.  </p>
<p>00:09:42:10 - 00:10:19:27<br>Sean<br>Now, when I was working at Groupon, I really enjoyed I was doing sales and I was like launching markets. My first market at Groupon was Fayetteville, North Carolina, and it's like a tiny military town outside of Raleigh. And I like went out there and it was really fun actually, like going to visit and like meeting with, like I do my best customer was an indoor skydiving place, so I like to go there and like, do that and like meeting people face to face and like, doing those deals was really fun.  </p>
<p>00:10:19:29 - 00:10:49:06<br>Sean<br>And then I started to do the moved up from Fayetteville to Raleigh and then Charlotte, and then I started doing the Groupon getaways and I was doing I was like in charge of like the ski crew coupons, all the mountain stuff, all the resorts. And I found this one conference called the Mountain Travel Symposium. And I remember just pitching like the GM of the Groupon getaways.  </p>
<p>00:10:49:08 - 00:11:07:13<br>Sean<br>I was like, look, LivingSocial is they're they're like the headline sponsor. Like, we have no representation. We got to be there. Like and he's like, Well, I don't want to pay. I don't want to like, pay to be there, but like, I'll send you there if you want to go. I was like, okay, that's Squaw Valley. And I was like, This is sweet.  </p>
<p>00:11:07:19 - 00:11:26:16<br>Sean<br>I'm going to I'm going to get paid to go like ski for a week and like, meet all these. It was like a speed dating type of thing. And everyone's like skiers and stuff. And I, I there's a movie like my favorite ski movie. I think I probably told all the team about it called Na Na.  </p>
<p>00:11:26:17 - 00:11:27:20<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:11:27:22 - 00:11:46:21<br>Sean<br>And it's based on this book called Skyward. That's a NAS, like an acronym for Gaffney's Numerical Assessment of Redness. And he, Scott Gaffney and Rob Gaffney, they wrote this guidebook on how to attack the mountain and like.  </p>
<p>00:11:46:24 - 00:11:47:14<br>Marty<br>Get points.  </p>
<p>00:11:47:14 - 00:12:15:10<br>Sean<br>Points for certain lines, and then you get like extra credit points for doing shit, like going up, skiing up to a bunch of, like a stranger and saying like, Hey, I just want to let you know I'm the best rider on the mountain. Or like, I'm so much sicker than you. Like, I can't believe you're a pro. Just like, skiing naked, like, doing, like the more uncomfortable something made you feel, the more points it was worth And I think I was really I made everybody you like, watch that on the lacrosse team.  </p>
<p>00:12:15:11 - 00:12:16:09<br>Marty<br>Yes.  </p>
<p>00:12:16:11 - 00:12:27:28<br>Sean<br>I was like, this movie. It's how I live my life, how to do this. And, um, yeah, I. I had a hard time, like, keeping a desk job.  </p>
<p>00:12:28:02 - 00:12:43:05<br>Marty<br>Yeah, especially a group. Like. Like what happened to Groupon is it's still around. Like, I think Groupon maybe like one of the prototypical products of, like, zero interest rate policy companies. They just got a shit ton of money. Well, they were huge in Chicago when we were.  </p>
<p>00:12:43:06 - 00:13:11:16<br>Sean<br>So this was even this is way before zero interest rates. This was like for the longest time it was like, okay, we have like, I don't know, I felt like they really put, um, e-commerce and like email, like, okay, how do we, how do we figure out like what to do with, like social, like sharing and, and like emails and like deals and like, I don't know, I feel like Groupon was just the right place at the right time.  </p>
<p>00:13:11:16 - 00:13:36:25<br>Sean<br>And everyone figured out like, okay, if we can just get at Groupon deal, like we're going to get in front of so many people, we're going to drive so much traffic to our business. But it was ultimately like a lending platform because really these restaurants were like always strapped for cash and the best deals were like restaurant deals.  </p>
<p>00:13:36:25 - 00:13:58:24<br>Sean<br>And I'd be like, okay, you try to eat, call a restaurant. You say, okay, so what's your average ticket for for two people? And they'd say, Oh, it's $25. So you say, okay, we'll do a deal. $12 gets you $25 worth of food at, you know, your barbecue restaurant. You get $6 and we get $6. And that those rates aren't don't happen anymore.  </p>
<p>00:13:58:24 - 00:14:22:02<br>Sean<br>Or at least that's how it worked in the beginning. And so then they would sell like a thousand of these group bonds and so that's 6000 bucks and that's a 6000 bucks that they didn't have to do anything for. And then they get a check, you know, like 30 days later for 6000 bucks. But then they get like slammed business and like the whole staff is like, pissed off.  </p>
<p>00:14:22:02 - 00:14:31:01<br>Sean<br>The customers get pissed off and like, it's kind of a nightmare. But like, for a while it was like the hottest thing. It was like and it was like, really fun to work there.  </p>
<p>00:14:31:07 - 00:14:36:15<br>Marty<br>Like, I remember going to visit the Super Fund when some of our friends would work there. It was a campus.  </p>
<p>00:14:36:18 - 00:15:12:20<br>Sean<br>Every two weeks. There was like 60 people from like Big Ten schools that were just getting like, just graduated that were like rolling in and everyone's making like ten grand a month selling coupons. You know, It was like, crazy. It's great. And everyone's like, partying, like after work every night. Um, and like, you could see it was like instant gratification, you know, you'd like you call business, you do a deal, and then you in like seven days, it would be live on the Internet and then you just like, look at your deal, like after work on your phone, you just be like, you know, refreshing my deal.  </p>
<p>00:15:12:20 - 00:15:26:19<br>Sean<br>Like how much, you know, calculating your commission in your head, like, nice, nice, nice, like, kind of crazy, you know, thinking back and and thinking about, like, some of the businesses that just, like, got blown out. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:15:26:21 - 00:15:34:05<br>Marty<br>Is that not a viable business, Right? Like, imagine the restaurant sells at $5 for 12.  </p>
<p>00:15:34:08 - 00:15:40:28<br>Sean<br>Yeah. I mean, you can only do it like once a year or like, once very sparingly. But then, like, it's like a drug, like these restaurants.  </p>
<p>00:15:40:28 - 00:15:43:18  </p>
<p>Are like, Let's do it again. Run it again.  </p>
<p>00:15:43:21 - 00:15:46:06<br>Marty<br>Are they making money or are they losing money from this?  </p>
<p>00:15:46:08 - 00:15:57:11<br>Sean<br>It's not. It's like they're usually not making money, but it's like an advertising expense. Yeah, it's kind of how you have to I don't know. Think about it.  </p>
<p>00:15:57:13 - 00:15:59:18<br>Marty<br>Yeah. You're getting people in hoping they come back.  </p>
<p>00:15:59:21 - 00:16:15:26<br>Sean<br>Yeah, that's what that was one of our lines. When we call, we like, you know, Would you rather put up a billboard or. Or would you rather have them come in the door and try your food, you know, and let it speak for itself? You know, like, do you think you could get them to come back a second time?  </p>
<p>00:16:15:26 - 00:16:17:20<br>Sean<br>And they're always like, Yeah, oh yeah.  </p>
<p>00:16:17:22 - 00:16:22:01  </p>
<p>I can't get come back. It's like, I don't know. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:16:22:04 - 00:16:29:23<br>Marty<br>It's funny how that space has evolved now. It's all we think it's taken over Groupon of that.  </p>
<p>00:16:29:25 - 00:16:31:00<br>Sean<br>I don't know. I mean something.  </p>
<p>00:16:31:00 - 00:16:35:13<br>Marty<br>Like easy table. Easy table is I'm trying to think of the apps.  </p>
<p>00:16:35:15 - 00:16:42:09<br>Sean<br>I mean, I don't know any of these. I just do like Instacart.  </p>
<p>00:16:42:11 - 00:16:43:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:16:43:17 - 00:16:45:17<br>Sean<br>I like, never go out to eat.  </p>
<p>00:16:45:19 - 00:17:13:15<br>Marty<br>Well, that's the thing. That's like I mean, that's sort of what I wanted to dig into with you. Shawn good friend, founder of Salt of the Earth, which I've been using a lot of, and we've been talking a lot as you've been growing this business over the last six months. And I think having been your friend for shit almost a decade now, more than a decade now, 14 years now, 15 years on this crazy thing, I'm a decade out of college.  </p>
<p>00:17:13:17 - 00:17:23:24<br>Marty<br>It seems like you're really invigorated about, like starting your own business and leaning in and not only starting your own business, but something that sort of aligns with who you are today because you're not a party boy anymore.  </p>
<p>00:17:23:27 - 00:17:24:24  </p>
<p>No.  </p>
<p>00:17:24:27 - 00:17:26:12<br>Sean<br>No, no.  </p>
<p>00:17:26:14 - 00:17:28:28<br>Marty<br>You've really leaned into the health side of things.  </p>
<p>00:17:29:01 - 00:17:35:17<br>Sean<br>Yeah, man, I, uh. I'm almost like, seven years. Know, without a drink.  </p>
<p>00:17:35:20 - 00:17:39:05<br>Marty<br>How's that? How's that? What's. Why did you decide to start?  </p>
<p>00:17:39:08 - 00:18:04:21<br>Sean<br>Um, so it was on my 30th birthday or, like, right after my 30th birthday, I was, I was listening to this podcast of Tim Ferriss and Laird Hamilton. Mm hmm. And Tim Ferriss was like, So, Laird, if you could tell your 30 year old self like one piece of advice, like, what would it be? And Laird was like, Stop drinking alcohol.  </p>
<p>00:18:04:24 - 00:18:25:06<br>Sean<br>And I was just like, and Laird's like, you know, you know, Laird, he's like, this epic, like, big wave surfer. He's just like that. I stared and I was like, I want to be like, Laird, like it. I don't know. Something about the way he said it. And like, I was had been giving up alcohol for Lent for like six years.  </p>
<p>00:18:25:06 - 00:18:31:22<br>Sean<br>And it was always like something that I saw huge benefits from. I was like.  </p>
<p>00:18:31:22 - 00:18:33:29  </p>
<p>Wow, like my sleep's.  </p>
<p>00:18:34:01 - 00:18:44:19<br>Sean<br>Better. Like, I'm just like feeling better. It's just all these benefits. And then like also I remember my telling my grandmother, like, like and I was doing this. She's like, Why don't.  </p>
<p>00:18:44:19 - 00:18:49:07  </p>
<p>You just give up? Just stop. If you keep talking about how great it is, why don't you just stop, All right?  </p>
<p>00:18:49:09 - 00:18:58:06<br>Sean<br>Maybe. And then, like, she died and then, like, I don't know, a few weeks later, I heard Laird say that, and I was just like, Yeah, I'm like, Try it.  </p>
<p>00:18:58:06 - 00:19:01:01<br>Marty<br>Maybe that's insane. Do you miss it at all?  </p>
<p>00:19:01:04 - 00:19:03:10  </p>
<p>No, not really.  </p>
<p>00:19:03:12 - 00:19:13:00<br>Sean<br>Like, Oh, it's, uh. It's helped me a lot. Just, like, not drinking. Like, um.  </p>
<p>00:19:13:03 - 00:19:15:02<br>Marty<br>In what ways?  </p>
<p>00:19:15:04 - 00:19:38:02<br>Sean<br>I mean, really, Like this sleep was probably the biggest thing. Um, I mean, but then the, uh, the drugs didn't really stop after the after the drinking. I let that keep going for another, like, four or five months. And then I got, like, crazy, and then I was like, I got to stop everything.  </p>
<p>00:19:38:04 - 00:19:39:07  </p>
<p>Oh.  </p>
<p>00:19:39:09 - 00:19:41:14<br>Marty<br>So you've been completely sober for almost seven years.  </p>
<p>00:19:41:14 - 00:19:45:18<br>Sean<br>Yeah. Yeah. Pretty wild change.  </p>
<p>00:19:45:19 - 00:19:47:14<br>Marty<br>How crazy does it get?  </p>
<p>00:19:47:16 - 00:20:06:29<br>Sean<br>Like I want to share somehow on this podcast, the pictures that we have of, like, popping champagne bottles from like the championship days and like, I mean, I designed a shirt for our lacrosse team that was like it was like a PBR, DePaul, Blue Demons. I don't think I have the shirt anymore, but.  </p>
<p>00:20:06:29 - 00:20:08:03<br>Marty<br>Jeremy Shockey Sharkey's got once.  </p>
<p>00:20:08:03 - 00:20:15:29<br>Sean<br>He's got he's got one somewhere. Um, which is another kind of crazy story. Um.  </p>
<p>00:20:16:01 - 00:20:20:24<br>Marty<br>He became best friends with Jeremy Shockey for a short stint there. So talk to him at all.  </p>
<p>00:20:20:27 - 00:20:21:10  </p>
<p>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:20:21:17 - 00:21:02:20<br>Sean<br>I mean, every once in a while, um, so yeah, that was during the same time actually, that we were doing the coaching. And then I was like, helping out, helping you out with the coaching at DePaul. I went on vacation. Um, so at this company, Bright Tag, they're really flexing the, like, unlimited vacation policy. And I was like, I'm going to take two weeks and go to Vail and a December like Peace and like my brother was like Mountain Safety and Beaver Creek and he was living in this dorm style place called the Tarns.  </p>
<p>00:21:02:20 - 00:21:26:06<br>Sean<br>And it was like a like a college dorm. I mean, it was like a common room. This was like this big. And then four bedrooms attached and I was sleeping on the couch, but it was ski in, ski out. So I was like skiing a lot. And the second day in, I was getting kind of bored because they all had like, jobs and I could only ski with like my brother like half the day certain days.  </p>
<p>00:21:26:09 - 00:22:01:24<br>Sean<br>And so I found out that you could the private lessons were $1,000 a day. And I was like, I could do that. Like, I'm like better skier than this guy. And so I posted an ad on Craigslist saying, you know, I'll give free snowboard lessons, skiing or snowboarding lessons. Um, anywhere in like Summit County, like around. And so I'm getting hit up like crazy and I have like these two girls that want to go snowboarding.  </p>
<p>00:22:01:26 - 00:22:23:02<br>Sean<br>I've never given a lesson and I go to the bar that night and I it's Jeremy Shockey sits down right next to me and I was like, Whoa. Like, Sky's massive. And I was like, Can I get a, like, picture? And I'm like, just hanging with him. And he's like, and I'm wearing like, I have a little bit of gear, like, gear like, I'm wearing a hat that says, like, Beaver Creek.  </p>
<p>00:22:23:02 - 00:22:35:11<br>Sean<br>It kind of looks like I'm like, I work for the mountain a little bit. And he's like, What do you do? What are you doing here? And I was like, Yeah, well, I'm giving these two girls snowboarding lessons tomorrow.  </p>
<p>00:22:35:13 - 00:22:42:00  </p>
<p>And he's like, Dude, let's find these girls. He's like, He's like.  </p>
<p>00:22:42:02 - 00:23:02:29<br>Sean<br>Give me your number. And cause there's no girls in the mountain towns. It's like 8 to 1 ratio. So he's like, text me the next day. He's like, Oh, what are you guys doing? I was like, Hey, sorry. Like the next day the girls bail. They're like, hung over, not going to, not going to go skiing. And so Shockey was like, Well, all right, well, can you give me and my friend like lessons?  </p>
<p>00:23:03:01 - 00:23:32:02<br>Sean<br>I was like, Sure. I've never gotten a lesson before and like, I have a GoPro and he introduces me. This guy, this guy's name's Fred, and he's like in his fifties and he's like very beginner snowboarder. And he's like, Okay, so how does this work? Like you're like, free or what? And I was like, Look, I, um, it's it's known as pirate instruction on the mountain.  </p>
<p>00:23:32:04 - 00:23:52:11<br>Sean<br>Like, you get banned for life if you get caught doing this at Vail Resorts. I didn't know that at the time, but like they they'll, they'll try to throw a felony at you saying it's like theft of service from Vail Resorts. It's federal wildlife land like all this bullshit so you have to you can't like you can't even post that on Craigslist anymore.  </p>
<p>00:23:52:15 - 00:24:14:26<br>Sean<br>They they like scan it and they'll pull it down. But I was like, look, I'm not like, not really allowed to, like, charge you for a lesson, but like, if you want to give me a tip, you can, um, it's a thousand. Or you can go pay $1,000 to, to Vail. And like, I have a GoPro, I'm going to make a video.  </p>
<p>00:24:14:26 - 00:24:27:18<br>Sean<br>It's going to be, like, way sicker than whatever you're going to get from the get from that, you know, idiot. And he was like, okay, let's do it. And he just throws me like 500 bucks, cash like Fred right away slaps my hand. I was like.  </p>
<p>00:24:27:23 - 00:24:28:25  </p>
<p>All right.  </p>
<p>00:24:28:27 - 00:24:49:29<br>Sean<br>We're in business. And then like the next day he just does it again. He just, like, keeps doing it. And then I'm like, hanging out. It's like him and shock. And then after a week of doing that, they're like, okay, every time we come back and these guys are in Miami and they're like, every time we come back out to the mountain, like we're going to fly out from Chicago and you'll like, be our guy.  </p>
<p>00:24:50:02 - 00:24:50:28  </p>
<p>I was like, All right.  </p>
<p>00:24:51:00 - 00:25:13:25<br>Sean<br>Sweet. So like, that was like Christmas. I did that and then like, spring break, I did that, and then another Christmas, another spring break and then, you know, two Christmases. And then they were like, okay, like they offered me a job in, like, their family office in South Beach, and I moved down. 2014.  </p>
<p>00:25:13:27 - 00:25:14:21<br>Marty<br>You've been in Miami ever.  </p>
<p>00:25:14:21 - 00:25:16:04<br>Sean<br>Since? I've been there ever since.  </p>
<p>00:25:16:04 - 00:25:17:07<br>Marty<br>You like Miami?  </p>
<p>00:25:17:10 - 00:25:21:16<br>Sean<br>I do like it, yeah. Miami Beach. South Beach.  </p>
<p>00:25:21:18 - 00:25:23:28<br>Marty<br>I think it suits your needs better than Chicago.  </p>
<p>00:25:24:00 - 00:25:40:29<br>Sean<br>I mean, I did. Yeah, I was like I was living with my parents right before that. Like, I was, like, had lost. Eventually lost that job with Bright Tag now and they changed their name like, a bunch of times. But yeah, it was like.  </p>
<p>00:25:40:29 - 00:25:42:07<br>Marty<br>Taking too many vacations.  </p>
<p>00:25:42:13 - 00:25:43:23<br>Sean<br>It's probably yeah, they're just like.  </p>
<p>00:25:43:26 - 00:25:44:28  </p>
<p>Is this fucking guy.  </p>
<p>00:25:44:28 - 00:25:48:09<br>Sean<br>Like, thinks he's like a lacrosse coach and a snowboard instructor. Like, you got.  </p>
<p>00:25:48:09 - 00:25:52:28  </p>
<p>A job to do, buddy? Like, it's like I call us.  </p>
<p>00:25:52:28 - 00:26:17:02<br>Sean<br>Nobody cares about tag management. Also, at the time, I was trying to sell a technology for, like, a stupid amount of money, like $5,000 a month at Google had just came out. I was like Google tag manager and that was free. And everyone's like, Oh, you're going to take your call. So, uh, yeah.  </p>
<p>00:26:17:04 - 00:26:25:02<br>Marty<br>And again, it doesn't seem like you're, you're cut out to work for somebody, which is like.  </p>
<p>00:26:25:05 - 00:26:28:25<br>Sean<br>Believe me, I've tried. I, you know, I've tried.  </p>
<p>00:26:28:27 - 00:26:42:16<br>Marty<br>But I'm the same way. Yeah, I tried to quit many times, but it's that thing. It's that nagging thing. And you were like, Oh, I'm not liking this life short. Like, I got to go after something I want. It's.  </p>
<p>00:26:42:18 - 00:27:04:00<br>Sean<br>Yeah. So then after the family office thing, I, I got a job with Oxygen.com and that was like, I was like, okay, this is cool. This is like tech, this is real estate. And I was like, doing a lot of real estate stuff and tech stuff. And then I was just like, This is just getting kind of bored.  </p>
<p>00:27:04:00 - 00:27:09:22<br>Sean<br>And I, I went to this like coding boot camp. Then you do a design called.  </p>
<p>00:27:09:22 - 00:27:10:15<br>Marty<br>Design Boot Camp.  </p>
<p>00:27:10:15 - 00:27:34:01<br>Sean<br>Now see, I was like, I'm going to do that. I was like, I want to like, build something, you know, like and that was 2017 and like, right before that, like kind of, like during, in the middle of that, I was like, okay, I'm going to try to start a snowboarding, a plant based approach. I was like, really into I had just watched what the health and was like.  </p>
<p>00:27:34:04 - 00:27:37:00<br>Sean<br>I was like, okay, I'm going to try the vegan thing.  </p>
<p>00:27:37:00 - 00:27:38:09<br>Marty<br>Hardcore. Oh God.  </p>
<p>00:27:38:12 - 00:27:39:10<br>Sean<br>I went there.  </p>
<p>00:27:39:10 - 00:27:40:06<br>Marty<br>At some store for.  </p>
<p>00:27:40:06 - 00:27:42:10<br>Sean<br>Like a year. I was like, hardcore.  </p>
<p>00:27:42:11 - 00:27:43:28<br>Marty<br>How unhealthy did you get?  </p>
<p>00:27:44:01 - 00:27:57:24<br>Sean<br>I mean, I was training for an Ironman too, so and I was like, Oh, I'm, I'm, I'm following the ritual playbook, you know, like this guy did five Ironman in like five days. And to me that was like and he was like 50. And I was like.  </p>
<p>00:27:57:27 - 00:28:01:07<br>Marty<br>Okay, as a vegan, Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:28:01:09 - 00:28:23:06<br>Sean<br>But then like now there's guys like James Lawrence who did like 50 Ironman and 50 states in 50 days. He's done 100. He just did this thing that I call like he did like 100 Ironman in a row. This he's not vegan like these guys. I even met like other like crazy Ironman athletes. And I was like, Yeah, I'm doing like vegan thing.  </p>
<p>00:28:23:06 - 00:28:52:18<br>Sean<br>And they were like, Dude, what are you doing? Like, now? But I don't know. For some people it works. I tried it and I was like, maybe. And I wanted to create a product because I saw this girl. Her name is Michelle Lewin. She's like, O.G., Instagram fitness, fitness influencer. She's like, She was like the first one. She was in my lived in my building in South Beach, and I'd see her at the gym and I was like, Yeah, she's pretty fit.  </p>
<p>00:28:52:20 - 00:29:03:20<br>Sean<br>But like, she just made it look really easy, you know? Like she has probably like 50 million followers on Instagram now and like, she's, she launched some products and just like, blew up. And I.  </p>
<p>00:29:03:20 - 00:29:05:24  </p>
<p>Was like, Oh my God, like.  </p>
<p>00:29:05:27 - 00:29:17:14<br>Sean<br>This, Crazy. Like, you just needed, like, I don't know, be fair and, like, come up with a product and like, put it on Instagram and it'll sell. And you got to be like a hot girl.  </p>
<p>00:29:17:16 - 00:29:19:28<br>Marty<br>That helps. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:29:20:01 - 00:29:50:21<br>Sean<br>But then I was like, in South Beach, you know, trying to sell a snowboarding plant based, like high altitude training, protein powder, just like it just, like, didn't work. It wasn't. It just it just didn't work. And so then I was like, and it was all kind of falling apart while I was doing the coding boot camp. And so then I was like, okay, I'm gonna like try to get more like technical and like, learn more about, like how to build a company on my own.  </p>
<p>00:29:50:21 - 00:30:13:10<br>Sean<br>Like, I just, I want to build something and kind of got into like, uh, like the DevOps stuff like us and, uh, just like cloud architecture. And then, well, at a coding boot camp, I made a product I actually won, actually, you know, who's in my boot camp was Sam Abbasi.  </p>
<p>00:30:13:15 - 00:30:15:12<br>Marty<br>Mm hmm. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:30:15:14 - 00:30:16:29<br>Sean<br>Who's been on the podcast?  </p>
<p>00:30:17:03 - 00:30:21:29<br>Marty<br>On podcast. 1031 Portfolio company. Ho Second, they actually just made a big announcement today what it was.  </p>
<p>00:30:22:01 - 00:30:25:06<br>Sean<br>What's the deal? What's he what's he up to? I haven't talked to him in, like, forever.  </p>
<p>00:30:25:06 - 00:30:47:08<br>Marty<br>He found a company Husky, and there they essentially are creating a tool that allows you to validate that you own Bitcoin. And so they just announced this partnership with Bitwise, which launched one of the ETFs where like, oh, will help validate and do proof of reserves for them so that they can prove the ETF actually has the Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:30:47:10 - 00:30:54:26<br>Sean<br>Oh, so we had this competition at the end of the boot camp.  </p>
<p>00:30:54:28 - 00:30:57:02<br>Marty<br>I want was it your.  </p>
<p>00:30:57:04 - 00:31:21:00<br>Sean<br>It was it was called Cabbage Patch. It was the dollar cost averaging app. And um, it worked actually worked like I like was able to like, you know, scrap it together and like get it to work. And then I tried to actually, um, Sam and a his team actually tried to like buy me or like a figure out there, like, let's work together.  </p>
<p>00:31:21:00 - 00:31:48:29<br>Sean<br>And I was like, uh, I don't know, I'm going to try to sell this thing on my own. And I had this guy who started a company. He, he was like, had some he just sort of raised like, explain the explain the app. So the app is called Cabbage Patch, and it was it hooked up to your bank account and every after every year it would round up every purchase and then buy Bitcoin with the spare change.  </p>
<p>00:31:49:01 - 00:32:16:10<br>Sean<br>Um, so if you bought this coffee for, you know, any sense, it would round up to a dollar and it took that $0.20 invested in a bitcoin. The problem is if you're buying bitcoin at $0.20, the commission is like huge at the transaction. It was like doesn't really make sense to buy that much, that small amount, that small amount of bitcoin that frequently.  </p>
<p>00:32:16:13 - 00:32:39:07<br>Sean<br>So what it turning to was an app that just bought bitcoin. It would be like the way that the work around was like, okay, we're going to tally up your spare change at the end of the month. And it was usually around 20 bucks. And so that was, that was like the app. It was basically like 20 bucks on average, like you're going to buy every month and like on autopilot.  </p>
<p>00:32:39:13 - 00:32:46:00<br>Sean<br>Um, and yeah, a bunch of apps kind of came out at the same time doing the same thing.  </p>
<p>00:32:46:00 - 00:32:47:19<br>Marty<br>You can do that with Cash app now.  </p>
<p>00:32:47:21 - 00:32:48:20<br>Sean<br>You could do with Cash App.  </p>
<p>00:32:48:23 - 00:32:51:02  </p>
<p>At the time you couldn't do it with cash.  </p>
<p>00:32:51:02 - 00:32:53:04<br>Marty<br>And maybe planted the idea.  </p>
<p>00:32:53:04 - 00:33:07:23<br>Sean<br>And then I mean there's like there was, I wasn't the first one to have the idea there is there is a couple other out there like but there is there was a guy actually he had the best one that was called coin flash. I remember I remember just staring at his site.  </p>
<p>00:33:07:23 - 00:33:10:08  </p>
<p>And be like, Damn, this guy's so good.  </p>
<p>00:33:10:10 - 00:33:12:09<br>Marty<br>I was calling Flash.  </p>
<p>00:33:12:12 - 00:33:16:06<br>Sean<br>The same thing, but like he had you could buy like coins to buy.  </p>
<p>00:33:16:06 - 00:33:17:23<br>Marty<br>Etc.. It sounds terrible.  </p>
<p>00:33:17:25 - 00:33:30:20<br>Sean<br>You could be like he also was better with JavaScript and like, so the front end looked really slick. It was like a lot of a lot of toggles and moving parts. I was just like, Ooh, like, that's nice.  </p>
<p>00:33:30:22 - 00:33:40:27<br>Marty<br>We're like, I think I was saying this earlier. I think to Parker you were probably one of the only dudes at the part that listen to me. Back in the day, I was like, You guys should, like, maybe look into Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:33:41:00 - 00:33:43:10<br>Sean<br>Yeah, No, we were.  </p>
<p>00:33:43:13 - 00:33:44:02  </p>
<p>I think the.  </p>
<p>00:33:44:02 - 00:33:49:13<br>Sean<br>First time I heard about Bitcoin was, um.  </p>
<p>00:33:49:15 - 00:33:50:09  </p>
<p>I had.  </p>
<p>00:33:50:12 - 00:34:24:13<br>Sean<br>A couple of friends that had this other startup that had this one engineer from Notre Dame, and he was like, I just heard he was like, he just had bought like so much bitcoin. It was like this. And, and he, he was like, just like a dirty, nerdy, like, super nice guy, super brilliant guy. And I just kept hearing this story about how he, like, you know, hit it big and then lost it all, you know, like he got hacked or something.  </p>
<p>00:34:24:13 - 00:34:38:09  </p>
<p>It was like, Oh, like Joel, you have like 10 million Bitcoin and you just like and then he but then some version hacker took it all and then he moved to Africa or something. And I was like, Man, what is this Bitcoin?  </p>
<p>00:34:38:09 - 00:34:48:09<br>Sean<br>And then like, I remember you and me chatting about it, like probably, yeah, early on, just like in guys, like.  </p>
<p>00:34:48:11 - 00:34:51:13  </p>
<p>Like, are you following this stuff like this? It's like, pretty wild.  </p>
<p>00:34:51:16 - 00:35:03:02<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it was when I was working at a Dearborn, I forgot about chit chat. It was like you, my wife, and like two other people. I would g chat chats, and that's where I would like. And I was like, Dude.  </p>
<p>00:35:03:04 - 00:35:04:06<br>Sean<br>You should check this out.  </p>
<p>00:35:04:06 - 00:35:09:00  </p>
<p>Yeah, yeah. Oh, for sure. This is like, this is some big stuff here.  </p>
<p>00:35:09:02 - 00:35:12:13<br>Marty<br>What do you think about it now, ten years later?  </p>
<p>00:35:12:16 - 00:35:36:01<br>Sean<br>Yeah, it's like it's still, like, very legit. I mean, it's like, gotten, um. I personally, I feel like it's sometimes I get a little, like, depressed about bitcoin just because, like, for it to really, like, thrive. I feel like the world just kind of has to fall apart.  </p>
<p>00:35:36:02 - 00:35:37:09<br>Marty<br>I don't think so.  </p>
<p>00:35:37:11 - 00:35:46:08<br>Sean<br>Like, I feel like it's constantly like you're waiting for, like, like it's a lot of doom and gloom.  </p>
<p>00:35:46:10 - 00:35:57:22<br>Marty<br>There is a lot of doom and gloom, but I don't think like that necessarily needs to fall apart. I think the likelihood of the world falling apart is pretty high. It's not. Yeah, and that's why Bitcoin exists.  </p>
<p>00:35:57:27 - 00:36:12:07<br>Sean<br>Yeah. Like it's it's nice. It's it's great to have like I just think it's like amazing. It's great. But I feel like when I get really into it, like when I, when I see like, like the whole Twitter, like worlds, I'm just.  </p>
<p>00:36:12:07 - 00:36:19:12  </p>
<p>Like, oh, like that's so, like, dark sometimes. I mean, it's like, it's so like I.  </p>
<p>00:36:19:14 - 00:36:33:23<br>Sean<br>I don't know, I, I like, keep my distance like a healthy distance, but I'm still like, paying attention and like, seeing what's going on all the time. Yeah. Like I loved going to El Salvador, like Bitcoin Beach.  </p>
<p>00:36:33:26 - 00:36:36:09<br>Marty<br>And you went there, you go there with Athena.  </p>
<p>00:36:36:12 - 00:36:56:19<br>Sean<br>So I went there while I went there by myself. Um, I had brought my girlfriend at the time and I just wanted to, like, go surf there and, like, check it out. And then, and like, buying pupusas with, you know, like bitcoin and stuff and like, going to restaurants and, like, buying food with Bitcoin. I was like, This is awesome.  </p>
<p>00:36:56:20 - 00:37:18:04<br>Sean<br>I was like, This is like, real happening. I was like four years ago. Three, I don't know. Yeah, like three or four years ago, I was doing that and, and then I saw though, and I met like the strike guys down there and I really wanted a bitcoin beach t shirt like that was like, Oh, these are sick.  </p>
<p>00:37:18:09 - 00:37:27:07<br>Sean<br>And then as they're giving me one, they're like, Oh, you're in Miami, Can you give one to Mayor Suarez? I was like, like, I don't know the guy.  </p>
<p>00:37:27:09 - 00:37:28:25  </p>
<p>Like.  </p>
<p>00:37:28:27 - 00:37:43:23<br>Sean<br>And they're like, Dear, just take one and get, get it to him. I was like, okay. So then like when I landed, I deemed him and he like I was like, Hey, I got this shirt from Bitcoin Beach guys, can I, like, bring it over? And he was like, Yeah, come on. Tomorrow.  </p>
<p>00:37:43:25 - 00:37:46:08  </p>
<p>I was like, Oh.  </p>
<p>00:37:46:10 - 00:37:52:19<br>Sean<br>And then I was like, Is this actually him or is this? And he was like, Yeah, that's me. I was like.  </p>
<p>00:37:52:21 - 00:37:53:29<br>Marty<br>Where did you meet him?  </p>
<p>00:37:54:01 - 00:38:03:05<br>Sean<br>City Hall. He was there, dude. It was crazy because he the two buildings in Surfside had just gone down. I remember when I had.  </p>
<p>00:38:03:06 - 00:38:08:11<br>Marty<br>Oh yeah, I've got some theories on that one. Oh.  </p>
<p>00:38:08:14 - 00:38:09:04<br>Sean<br>Oh, yeah.  </p>
<p>00:38:09:04 - 00:38:12:21  </p>
<p>Let's yeah.  </p>
<p>00:38:12:23 - 00:38:29:09<br>Marty<br>There is a theory out there. So the theory for those buildings is that John McAfee's dead man switch was located. What was the theory out there? Have you heard this one, Luke? Now, there's a theory that John McAfee's dead man switch was located in that building. They had to take it down.  </p>
<p>00:38:29:12 - 00:38:33:18<br>Sean<br>So John McAfee is not just, like, alive somewhere like in the Caribbean.  </p>
<p>00:38:33:18 - 00:38:38:08<br>Marty<br>He may be, you know, his dead man switching to go off. Why not?  </p>
<p>00:38:38:11 - 00:38:41:19<br>Sean<br>What does a dead man's switch do or what is a dead man's switch?  </p>
<p>00:38:41:20 - 00:38:44:05<br>Marty<br>So if you're worried that the government or somebody is going to.  </p>
<p>00:38:44:07 - 00:38:45:00<br>Sean<br>Take you down, take.  </p>
<p>00:38:45:00 - 00:38:46:12<br>Marty<br>You down, you.  </p>
<p>00:38:46:15 - 00:38:48:06<br>Sean<br>You're going to take to put.  </p>
<p>00:38:48:06 - 00:39:00:19<br>Marty<br>Something. Yeah, you put something on a computer and you say, Hey, if I don't interact with this for X amount of time, like send the emails to the people or do something with the data. Uh.  </p>
<p>00:39:00:21 - 00:39:14:16<br>Sean<br>Uh, well, well, Suarez Just a theory. He was dealing. He was, he was in the middle of all that. He was like, he was in the middle of all that, and he was like, just swing by like 130.  </p>
<p>00:39:14:19 - 00:39:15:25  </p>
<p>It's like, okay.  </p>
<p>00:39:15:28 - 00:39:39:00<br>Sean<br>I like to show up. I was like, I got to get a picked ID, like, send it to the boys down in El Salvador. And he's like, he's wearing like fire department gear and he's holding up the Bitcoin beach shirt. I have like, it's a great pic. Um, but then I went back with Athena, so, you know, Matty is going horn.  </p>
<p>00:39:39:00 - 00:40:07:27<br>Sean<br>He's like the president now of Athena. He he was like, head of sales or the head of Latin America because they're like a Chicago based company. Yeah. Um, Bitcoin ATMs. Athena And he had, he was like, yeah. Oh, Bitcoin was becoming legal tender in El Salvador, September 7th, I remember. And it was like August, I was just there in May and August rolls around.  </p>
<p>00:40:07:27 - 00:40:13:08<br>Sean<br>I was like, Dude, like, this is cool. What's happening down there? You're like, They're a lot, right?  </p>
<p>00:40:13:08 - 00:40:16:06  </p>
<p>He's like, he's like, Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:40:16:08 - 00:40:29:28<br>Sean<br>I'm actually like part of the team to, like, help with the Chivo wallet and, like, get businesses down there, like, ready to go and like, he's like, I'm, I need so much help right now. He's like, Actually, can you come down and help me?  </p>
<p>00:40:30:00 - 00:40:32:10  </p>
<p>I was like, What? It's like, okay.  </p>
<p>00:40:32:12 - 00:40:35:15<br>Sean<br>It's like, can you get on a flight tomorrow? I was like, Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:40:35:17 - 00:40:37:14  </p>
<p>Let's go. I just.  </p>
<p>00:40:37:14 - 00:41:11:09<br>Sean<br>Like, show up and do this like Airbnb that they, they rent it out and it was like a war room. It was like it was like 12 dudes in this Airbnb and they had all these, like card readers that were like chievo wallet and like government sponsored and like, I have another picture that I'll send you. Logan This is like me at this desk, this table with like the whole, with, like this whole operation of, like people that were like, it was very it felt very cool.  </p>
<p>00:41:11:10 - 00:41:30:10<br>Sean<br>Like, very, like, pull it. I was in with, like the, the whole, like top dogs, like, okay, we're, we're making this happen with bitcoin. It's like we got to get Walmart to be able to accept Bitcoin here and like the McDonald's and like all the everything is going to have to accept bitcoin in four weeks. Like, are you ready?  </p>
<p>00:41:30:10 - 00:41:32:10<br>Sean<br>And I was like, Dude, what are you going to have me to even do?  </p>
<p>00:41:32:17 - 00:41:35:16  </p>
<p>I don't even know what's going on here.  </p>
<p>00:41:35:19 - 00:41:42:18<br>Sean<br>And they, they just I didn't really know. It was like it was just a madhouse. It was like, seriously mad.  </p>
<p>00:41:42:24 - 00:41:48:08<br>Marty<br>The fact that you were like, I didn't know this until about the fact that you're, like, in the room and all this is.  </p>
<p>00:41:48:14 - 00:41:54:27<br>Sean<br>Like, boo, like brother is like, running this shit. And he's like, walks in the room and, and like, Mitch, he is, is like.  </p>
<p>00:41:54:27 - 00:41:57:23  </p>
<p>Under the desk, like, no gel. Like.  </p>
<p>00:41:57:26 - 00:42:02:20<br>Sean<br>Like where? And there was like we were getting, like, escorted around and stuff and.  </p>
<p>00:42:02:27 - 00:42:03:21<br>Marty<br>What did you actually do.  </p>
<p>00:42:03:21 - 00:42:04:23  </p>
<p>So they, you know.  </p>
<p>00:42:04:25 - 00:42:22:24<br>Sean<br>So they wanted me to look like I was like part of the team. They were trying to, like, make their team look like bigger and like, smarter and like, American. I don't know. And like, Mathias was like, we'll figure something out for you to do. Like, maybe you can help us out with, like, the idea of as infrastructure or something, or like, we'll figure something out for you to do.  </p>
<p>00:42:22:26 - 00:42:38:07<br>Sean<br>And after like a day or two of just like, hanging out with them, I was like, I just I don't see what I'm going to do here. Like, I don't know how I'm going to be adding value. Like, this is like, you know, there's it was just kind of a wild, wild West.  </p>
<p>00:42:38:10 - 00:42:40:16  </p>
<p>And what was I do.  </p>
<p>00:42:40:16 - 00:42:42:22<br>Marty<br>This is some incredible insight into the rollout.  </p>
<p>00:42:42:22 - 00:42:43:24  </p>
<p>Of dude so.  </p>
<p>00:42:43:24 - 00:42:44:29<br>Marty<br>Oh, elated.  </p>
<p>00:42:45:01 - 00:42:49:17<br>Sean<br>So such incredible such incredible insight that I was like.  </p>
<p>00:42:49:19 - 00:42:53:07  </p>
<p>How can I how can I make money off this situation?  </p>
<p>00:42:53:09 - 00:43:06:02<br>Sean<br>I was like, Athena was trading on an exchange and the price of Athena was like $0.80.  </p>
<p>00:43:06:04 - 00:43:06:21<br>Marty<br>To.  </p>
<p>00:43:06:23 - 00:43:06:28  </p>
<p>Get.  </p>
<p>00:43:06:28 - 00:43:25:16<br>Sean<br>Myself in trouble. Yeah, no, I because I alt at all and nothing wrong happened. So I actually I was like because they were didn't know how they were going to pay me either. They're like, oh maybe we'll give you shares of the company. I was like, What does this company even worth? So I'm like looking at these filings and like trying to figure understand the business.  </p>
<p>00:43:25:16 - 00:43:26:13<br>Sean<br>And.  </p>
<p>00:43:26:15 - 00:43:30:13  </p>
<p>And then I was like, You know what? I'm going to buy.  </p>
<p>00:43:30:16 - 00:43:57:00<br>Sean<br>You know, I've been I've been known to option trade for my day. You know, my dad was a broker dealer at the Board of Trade, and I've just been into it. And I was like, yeah, I could buy some of these options on this. Athena stock that's, you know, $0.80. And I bought like $1,000 worth it. And and then I told I told Mathias I was like, Dude, I just like, I just bought some, some Athena stock.  </p>
<p>00:43:57:00 - 00:44:16:01<br>Sean<br>And he was like, he's like, yeah, like, I don't know if that's going to be like, doing it. Like, he was just like, yeah, I don't know about that, that move. And I was like, really like this guy. I was like he was, he talked me out. It he basically, like, made me think like, oh, this is a bad move.  </p>
<p>00:44:16:06 - 00:44:37:24<br>Sean<br>Like I'm and I was like, you know, I'm gonna cash out. I'm just going to get out of this the next day. It's someone leaks that like Athena's, it's on Twitter. Someone leaks like Athena's the one rolling out Chievo wallet in Bitcoin price shoots up to like $30. It would have been worth a lot. And I was just like, Fuck, man.  </p>
<p>00:44:37:24 - 00:44:43:18<br>Sean<br>I felt that was like my shot and yeah.  </p>
<p>00:44:43:20 - 00:44:46:04<br>Marty<br>Unfortunately you couldn't incriminate yourself because you sold.  </p>
<p>00:44:46:06 - 00:44:48:00<br>Sean<br>I did sell.  </p>
<p>00:44:48:02 - 00:44:48:23  </p>
<p>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:44:48:26 - 00:44:59:08<br>Marty<br>This is the the weird world of Sean McDonald. I just end up in these places next to Jeremy Shockey in the war room with Buckley's team as they're rolling out that coin.  </p>
<p>00:44:59:11 - 00:45:01:27<br>Sean<br>Yeah, that was. That was crazy.  </p>
<p>00:45:02:00 - 00:45:06:02<br>Marty<br>How do you how do you end up in these situations?  </p>
<p>00:45:06:04 - 00:45:17:16<br>Sean<br>Um, I don't know. I probably just following the curiosity. I feel like that's probably how I ended up there and just, like, willing to, like, kind of go for it.  </p>
<p>00:45:17:19 - 00:45:18:09<br>Marty<br>To send it.  </p>
<p>00:45:18:09 - 00:45:19:09<br>Sean<br>If you will. Yeah, just.  </p>
<p>00:45:19:13 - 00:45:20:07  </p>
<p>Just.  </p>
<p>00:45:20:10 - 00:45:23:03<br>Sean<br>Send it here.  </p>
<p>00:45:23:05 - 00:45:26:03<br>Marty<br>That I did not know that you never told me that story.  </p>
<p>00:45:26:05 - 00:45:46:12<br>Sean<br>Yeah, I'm almost positive I've told you that story. Like, I feel like there's more to it, too. I mean, I still keep in touch with those guys. Like, I shout out Carlos, this guy, he's like an attorney down there. And he was like, Dude, I sent him some salt of the earth. He, like, loves it. It's like, Oh, we got to get this down there.  </p>
<p>00:45:46:15 - 00:45:51:28<br>Sean<br>But like, shipping internationally is like, I don't know.  </p>
<p>00:45:52:00 - 00:46:04:21<br>Marty<br>Let's, let's dive into this, okay? Like, I love this shit to working a lot. It's funny, having known you for 15 years. Yeah, made me room is finally I only found his name here. What's been like starting this company?  </p>
<p>00:46:04:24 - 00:46:32:04<br>Sean<br>This has been super fun. I mean, um, so I have kind of always been into this. Like, I worked at the Gatorade Sports Science Institute in high school. It was like, across the street from high school. Barrington It's not there anymore, but it used to be one of their like hubs and so I would do these different, like lab tests and try new flavors and they would analyze my sweat.  </p>
<p>00:46:32:04 - 00:46:49:09<br>Sean<br>And it was kind of just like this weird, you know, side gig that I did for like ten years. It was like always like, hey, like I get an envelope in the mail. That's how or I'd get an email, actually, and they'd say like, Yeah, we got this new ten week study like, Are you available? It pays like 50 bucks an hour.  </p>
<p>00:46:49:09 - 00:47:20:00<br>Sean<br>I was like, always, like, Yeah, yeah, hell yeah. That train is always on time. And then I just was like, failing with my own, you know, with the protein powder and then like, just like, started to do e-commerce stuff the last year on Amazon and I was reselling other brands like I was reselling a lot of shoes, a lot of Nike, Adidas and Puma, New Balance.  </p>
<p>00:47:20:03 - 00:47:52:03<br>Sean<br>And I was like, Man, I want to just sell my own brand. The margins are so much better. And um, kind of went on this like this, like surf sabbatical all last year where I was like, you know, I had this video editing agency that I stumbled upon to where I met Ryan Breslau. He was like my I met him at this party, at this like hackathon party in my at Miami hack week and just like started talking to him and whatever.  </p>
<p>00:47:52:03 - 00:48:19:25<br>Sean<br>And then I like showed him a video that I made for a VC, Atomic Ventures that I was like, I don't know what I was doing. I just made this cool video. It was actually a video of pump and, um. ABRAMS Uh, Abraham, I forget the guy's name, Uh, but it was a video of pump actually, and I showed it to him and I was like, Yo, like, Ryan, do you know anyone that would, like, want videos like this?  </p>
<p>00:48:19:27 - 00:48:27:03<br>Sean<br>And he was like, me, I want these. Like, okay, like how many is like, a lot?  </p>
<p>00:48:27:06 - 00:48:29:07  </p>
<p>And I'm like, okay.  </p>
<p>00:48:29:07 - 00:48:46:10<br>Sean<br>And again, never had had no experience doing this at all. I was like, okay, well, we can go rent a studio just kind of like this. We just go rent a studio for like an hour and a half. And I would just like talk to him and ask him questions, kind of like a podcast, and he would just like, talk.  </p>
<p>00:48:46:10 - 00:49:05:12<br>Sean<br>And then I, I had a team in the Philippines that were just like, cut it up and animate it and then he would like, share it. And then after he started posting these, I started like getting more clients, like people that were just like, Y'all make those for me. And then, and that that was a business that was 0% interest.  </p>
<p>00:49:05:12 - 00:49:30:29<br>Sean<br>Like everybody had money for that. And then they didn't like I was like, Now this is like the price came way down. The air tools got way more advanced, like so like I had that business going with the shoes and then I was also selling offshore software development people because I just like knew how to code. I just like kind of sucked at it and I was like, I'm better at sales.  </p>
<p>00:49:30:29 - 00:49:52:09<br>Sean<br>I could just get these guys in India or South America or whoever and link them up with companies here in the U.S. and so, yeah, I just kind of like had all these different things going on. And then at the beginning of 2023, I was like, I started this like surf adventure. I was like, okay, I'm going to Costa Rica for a month.  </p>
<p>00:49:52:11 - 00:50:13:10<br>Sean<br>Uh, I'm getting ready to go to this place, the mental wise, in Indonesia. Have you ever, you know, the mental health? So I'm like, I booked this trip with four guys from University of Denver when I went there. Um, and these are like good snowboarders and friends and we all kind of picked up surfing later on and we had just put this trip in the books.  </p>
<p>00:50:13:10 - 00:50:35:14<br>Sean<br>It's kind of like one of those like destination, like bucket list surf trips. I was not prepared. Like I, my skill level was like not there. And so I was like, I'd spent a month in Costa Rica, surf every day. I, like had like this like coach that just like with, like scream at me and like, really, like, really push me hard.  </p>
<p>00:50:35:16 - 00:50:52:14<br>Sean<br>And then after that, I was like, Oh, I'm going to go to Nicaragua. And I actually linked up with Ryan O'Rourke. You remember him? Yeah, he's living. He was living in Santa Teresa. Another guy we played lacrosse with. He was living in Santa Teresa and he was like, Dude, I'm moving to Nicaragua.  </p>
<p>00:50:52:19 - 00:50:55:15  </p>
<p>I was like, Why? Because I got too crowded here.  </p>
<p>00:50:55:17 - 00:51:24:20<br>Sean<br>And it's too crowded. It's too expensive. Like, I want to go to Nicaragua. So then I went there for a month and I was in this place called Hacienda Iguana, which is like this bubble retirement community that has two world class waves. One's called panga drops and one's called Colorados, Colorado. This is like super famous wave that wasn't working the whole time that I was there, but I was still surfing, paying a drops every day.  </p>
<p>00:51:24:22 - 00:51:48:18<br>Sean<br>So then I go to. Then I go back to Miami. I'm still like doing the shoes thing, but it's just like, kind of like whatever it's like. And then I go to Portugal, surf in Eerie Sierra for a while, check out Nasri, meet up with one of my friends. Then we go to the mental wise, and once we're in the mental wise, it was like, I mean, amazing.  </p>
<p>00:51:48:18 - 00:52:14:12<br>Sean<br>Like heaven is like two weeks of just like we stay at this place called Awara Resort. And, you know, it is like it is like summer camp for adults. You know, you're you wake up at 6 a.m. and was awesome. It's like you're just like with your boys the whole time. You know, it's like you wake up at 6 a.m., have a coffee, and then you get in this boat and the boat takes you to these waves and like, perfect waves.  </p>
<p>00:52:14:14 - 00:52:26:09<br>Sean<br>And you're they're all by yourself with, like, you know, you're dudes and and you got, like, the music in the boat and it's kind of cool or whatever, and you just surf for, like, 3 hours till you're, like, dead. And then you get off, go back.  </p>
<p>00:52:26:12 - 00:52:27:10  </p>
<p>Eat.  </p>
<p>00:52:27:12 - 00:52:55:17<br>Sean<br>Go back, do it again for like ten days straight. You just did that. And it was like so it was like, amazing. And you're also eating like, really great food. And while that's happening, I'm like, kind of renting out my my studio in South Beach. The whole time. I had like kind of figured out I was listing my South Beach apartment and, uh, apartments dot com and I was like, getting people like and I was like, okay, yeah, like rent.  </p>
<p>00:52:55:19 - 00:53:16:12<br>Sean<br>I was just like, able to kind of, like, make it, like, swing it. And then when I was in mental wise, some girl was like, I want to book it for two months. I was like, okay, So she books it for two months and I was like, Where am I going to go? Like, And while I was there, everyone's like, You got to go to Bali.  </p>
<p>00:53:16:14 - 00:53:39:02<br>Sean<br>Like, we're here. It's like, close. Like, it's like, it's about to be peak season over there for surfing. Like you got to go. And so I was like, All right, I got to go. So then I find this spot in Bali. I book it like pay for the two months in advance, and then I get there and the girl flakes at the last second that was supposed to rent in spots.  </p>
<p>00:53:39:02 - 00:53:40:04  </p>
<p>I'm like, fuck.  </p>
<p>00:53:40:06 - 00:53:56:23<br>Sean<br>Like, I'm trying to get out of this now. I'm like and I can't get out of it. I can't get my money back. So I'm like, I just got to eat this and I'm going to stay and make the best of it. And so I'm like, I'm like, I need to start a new business. I'm like, I'm running out of money.  </p>
<p>00:53:56:23 - 00:54:30:07<br>Sean<br>I'm like, I got to start something new. And I was surfing super hard in the morning, like I'd wake up at like six, five, 36, surf for like 2 hours. And then I go to this place by training center. It was like, amazing. Just like, you know, like amazing, good looking people that are working out, sweating heavy. And then after that there's like a restaurant where everyone's, like, hanging out and then go to this place called Santo and there's like an amazing sauna ice bath.  </p>
<p>00:54:30:09 - 00:54:54:26<br>Sean<br>So I do that whole thing, that whole thing by 11 and I'd be done by like 11 and I'd be just dead, like, totally. And I'd be like, okay, try to like I'd go to this co-working space after and try to, like, get some work done on my businesses and stuff. And I just like, had no energy and I was like drinking caffeine and like drinking tons of water in lots of food and like, couldn't, couldn't wake up, like I couldn't get it going.  </p>
<p>00:54:54:26 - 00:55:17:08<br>Sean<br>And then I started to just like, add salt, just like pink Himalayan salt. And I was like waking up. And it just changed everything. Like I was totally a different person. I was able to just like, push through and recover and like, get up and just like, keep going. And so I was like, Man, I'm here. Like, I want to, like, make the best of every single day.  </p>
<p>00:55:17:11 - 00:55:55:02<br>Sean<br>I don't know if I'm ever to come back to this place like, I want to like, I want to surf every day, every morning, like I want to be out there. And, um, so that, yeah, it just like, helped me, like, get through it. And then I was like, I was there and I was like, talking to, you know, different suppliers and started to, like, visit them and like, tweak the formula and just like, really, like, get into it and like, working on, you know, working on the, uh, the packaging and the design and like, going back and forth with like different designers and like people in the Philippines that I knew that were like,  </p>
<p>00:55:55:05 - 00:56:18:16<br>Sean<br>you know, Sri Lanka, like all everyone was like, no one was, you know, I'm the only US based part of this brand really for now. But, um, yeah, I was just like really just hustling to, like, make it happen. And I was starting to take while I was in Bali, I was like, I'm going to start taking preorders.  </p>
<p>00:56:18:18 - 00:56:21:28<br>Sean<br>Like I have the formula kind of like, figured out like halfway.  </p>
<p>00:56:21:28 - 00:56:23:15<br>Marty<br>How did you come up with a formula?  </p>
<p>00:56:23:17 - 00:56:59:01<br>Sean<br>The formula was I wanted to, so I was like looking at Liquid Ivy and Element and I was kind of like, okay, these are like, these are the big boys. And first I was like, Okay, yeah. Liquid Ivy's definitely like the biggest boy. I mean, they, they that founder. I had kind of like, you know, admired his story, heard him talk about how he saw the product being developed, uh, or he saw like pro baseball players drinking Pedialyte and was like, this is kind of like, ridiculous.  </p>
<p>00:56:59:01 - 00:57:26:17<br>Sean<br>We should come up with something different. And, um, he, he just inspired me. And then, but I also really liked the element, guys. I was just like, these guys are. This seems like the more advanced way to do this. Like this. And then in just trying the different products myself, I was like, this is more the, the product that I think makes me feel the best.  </p>
<p>00:57:26:19 - 00:57:48:19<br>Sean<br>Um, like I feel like with Liquid Ivy, there's like all these, like B vitamins and like bunch of bullshit that just, like, doesn't really do anything. It's not like really going to make you feel that much better. Like, the salt is like, you could just do the salt, Like you could just buy pink Himalayan salt in the morning and like, not use this and like, yeah, you know, you'll, you'll feel it.  </p>
<p>00:57:48:21 - 00:57:52:01  </p>
<p>But it doesn't taste good. What does it do.  </p>
<p>00:57:52:04 - 00:58:14:06<br>Sean<br>The salt really like kind of like pushes water into your cells, like sodium, just like it's kind of like the simplest way I can like, explain it, but, um, yeah, I mean, it's really replacing also just replacing what you lose in sweat, you know, just like how Gatorade always sold it to you.  </p>
<p>00:58:14:08 - 00:58:18:23<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And they like because I've seen you do like the demos of like where you put the thing into.  </p>
<p>00:58:18:27 - 00:58:19:25<br>Sean<br>The metric meter.  </p>
<p>00:58:19:25 - 00:58:23:06<br>Marty<br>Yeah, the metric meter and that. So what's happening there.  </p>
<p>00:58:23:08 - 00:58:56:25<br>Sean<br>So that is a sensor. It's a piece of plastic that's like a straw that's held out by two copper wires and it measures the, the like strength of the charge between the two copper wires. And when there's a stronger electro, uh, like concentration, it's just like a stronger current. It's like, it's just like a stronger charge in your body.  </p>
<p>00:58:56:28 - 00:59:13:07<br>Sean<br>And when I so I saw a friend of mine actually had this metric meter Instagram video that he posted that, like, went super viral. And I was like, Oh, that's so smart. Where he's, like, grounding. He's like, has his feet on the ground.  </p>
<p>00:59:13:07 - 00:59:13:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah, yeah.  </p>
<p>00:59:14:02 - 00:59:32:21<br>Sean<br>And he's like, touching like a tree. And then he like, uses his and it's like, I was like, wow, that's like, like listening to someone talk about grounding is like, very, like hippie dippy. Like, I don't want to hear you, but like, when he pulled that thing out and you're, like, looking at numbers, you're like, Oh, this is like, legit.  </p>
<p>00:59:32:23 - 00:59:33:10<br>Sean<br>So I was like.  </p>
<p>00:59:33:10 - 00:59:36:06<br>Marty<br>I'm a big fan of of gravity. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:59:36:09 - 01:00:03:15<br>Sean<br>Me too. It's like, kind of weird to say, but like, it's totally legit. It's totally legit. I Mean, I love going out and like, I try to work out on the sand every day if I can. It's like it's the best and like, jump in the ocean. I feel like it's like the best. But when he showed that video, I was like, That is so powerful to like see some numbers, some measurement.  </p>
<p>01:00:03:18 - 01:00:13:13<br>Sean<br>And, you know, you hear you see there's so many comparison videos of like this is how much sugar our product has, this is how much sugar.  </p>
<p>01:00:13:13 - 01:00:14:22  </p>
<p>Our product has.  </p>
<p>01:00:14:22 - 01:00:25:04<br>Sean<br>You decide and it's like, show me something like, I don't know better than that. Like, that's like the Logan Paul movies and Logan Paul is like, this is.  </p>
<p>01:00:25:04 - 01:00:34:19  </p>
<p>How much Sugar Prime has, this is how much sugar everybody else gets. It's like, Shut up, their stuff sucks.  </p>
<p>01:00:34:22 - 01:00:37:17<br>Marty<br>You were telling me about what's wrong? A prime. It's got too much.  </p>
<p>01:00:37:19 - 01:01:01:15<br>Sean<br>It's all potassium. There's no sodium. It's like ten milligrams of sodium. And they're like, we have 800 milligrams electrolytes. Yeah, but like, 790 of them are potassium. And that's not like that's not hydrating you. It's not like helping you. Like you don't sweat potassium, like you sweat salt.  </p>
<p>01:01:01:17 - 01:01:04:17<br>Marty<br>So that's what salt of the earth this gets you The.  </p>
<p>01:01:04:25 - 01:01:08:00  </p>
<p>Salt get you the salt, baby. It's.  </p>
<p>01:01:08:03 - 01:01:09:18<br>Sean<br>Yeah, man.  </p>
<p>01:01:09:20 - 01:01:12:24<br>Marty<br>What's it been like getting this off the ground? It's been.  </p>
<p>01:01:12:27 - 01:01:13:07  </p>
<p>Dude.  </p>
<p>01:01:13:07 - 01:01:20:25<br>Sean<br>It's been. You know, I think Elon said this where he's like, you know, because I'll compare myself to Elon.  </p>
<p>01:01:20:27 - 01:01:24:03  </p>
<p>Uh, he's like.  </p>
<p>01:01:24:05 - 01:01:48:02<br>Sean<br>Entrepreneurship is like staring at a dark hole and, like, eating glass. You're just, I mean, like, I think it's just like, it's always like, uh, fear and euphoria, you know, like some days I'm just like, super high, like, Oh, my God, we just closed all these equinoxes and hotels, and then other days, I'm just like, How am I going to pay my rent?  </p>
<p>01:01:48:02 - 01:01:54:08<br>Sean<br>Like, what am I going to eat? Like, how is this going to work? So, you know, it's.  </p>
<p>01:01:54:10 - 01:02:07:27<br>Marty<br>Well, it seems like it's getting traction. Like that's it's been like I said, that's me first. Like, I'll, I'll try it out and it tastes like shit. And then I was at the gym. I usually take it after my workouts. I'm like, Oh, it does give you that burst of energy.  </p>
<p>01:02:07:29 - 01:02:25:00<br>Sean<br>I mean, I'll tell you, one of the highest I'll tell you the probably the highest I've ever gotten. Like pure euphoria feel was after you tweeted about it and seeing orders come in. I was I was just I was like, yes.  </p>
<p>01:02:25:02 - 01:02:31:29  </p>
<p>It was like ching, ching, ching, ching. You know, like, oh, my God. Oh, my gosh.  </p>
<p>01:02:32:01 - 01:02:34:11<br>Sean<br>Like adrenaline was like, going.  </p>
<p>01:02:34:14 - 01:02:43:13<br>Marty<br>Well, that's what we're talking about earlier. Like, how do you plan on like, something you had a good product and like, how do we scale it?  </p>
<p>01:02:43:16 - 01:02:49:29<br>Sean<br>You know, I think you just got to drink. And so to Ecom slash TFT.  </p>
<p>01:02:50:02 - 01:02:51:12  </p>
<p>Just hit that.  </p>
<p>01:02:51:12 - 01:03:07:25<br>Sean<br>But I don't know. I mean, I think I think I could bootstrap it pretty far. Yeah. Like, um, you know, that's, that's, it'd be nice to have this, this conversation in my head a.  </p>
<p>01:03:07:25 - 01:03:11:01  </p>
<p>Lot where it's like, yeah, just take the whole thing is.  </p>
<p>01:03:11:04 - 01:03:25:23<br>Sean<br>Bootstrap this baby. And then other times I'm like, nice to get like some investment and more people involved. But um, yeah, I don't know, just kind of going with the flow.  </p>
<p>01:03:25:25 - 01:03:34:27<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Yeah. I think you're writing a trend that I think people are really beginning to realize that, oh, maybe we should care about our health and do preventative health.  </p>
<p>01:03:34:29 - 01:03:35:11<br>Sean<br>Totally.  </p>
<p>01:03:35:14 - 01:03:37:17<br>Marty<br>Hydration is important as hydration important.  </p>
<p>01:03:37:19 - 01:03:37:28  </p>
<p>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:03:37:28 - 01:04:15:23<br>Sean<br>Then you know what's important is electrolytes. And, you know, you know this. I mean, first thing you do when you get into ERs, they hit you with the saline solution because you're probably dehydrated. Like 70% of the population is like chronically dehydrated. I mean, it makes it makes sense. I mean, a lot of times I've just noticed in myself, especially like with the fasting stuff, I've realized like, especially in the afternoon for some reason in the afternoon was when I would like, want to just like, eat snacks all, all afternoons.  </p>
<p>01:04:15:23 - 01:04:16:16  </p>
<p>I had snack.  </p>
<p>01:04:16:16 - 01:04:48:15<br>Sean<br>Time, like, let's just eat whatever. And I kind of realized it's like I'm not even hungry. I'm just like, bored. And I like just by like and then if I'm pref, I'm trying to replace that with water, then I'm just like, have to pee like, all the time. So then when I was like, Now if I just have one of these, I'm not, I'm not hungry, I'm just thirsty is what I've come to realize is that and I feel like that's probably the case with a lot of other people are they're not actually hungry, they're just thirsty.  </p>
<p>01:04:48:18 - 01:04:59:06<br>Sean<br>And it's kind of like disguised as like, Oh, I need to eat. But then like, I mean, you just in five days, no eating. It's like you can do it and like you feel actually pretty good.  </p>
<p>01:04:59:08 - 01:05:02:26<br>Marty<br>Like, yeah, I felt really good last Thursday.  </p>
<p>01:05:02:29 - 01:05:05:05<br>Sean<br>It's like, it's like amazing. Like at two.  </p>
<p>01:05:05:05 - 01:05:05:17<br>Marty<br>30 I.  </p>
<p>01:05:05:17 - 01:05:19:14<br>Sean<br>Was like, scared to do 72 hours because I was like, Oh my, I'm not going to be able to mentally function. I'm going to be like, But I was actually like really sharp, you know, you're kind of like on edge, like.  </p>
<p>01:05:19:16 - 01:05:28:01<br>Marty<br>At the end of day two, you're like, All right, I'm in a groove now. I'm like, used to being hungry. Hanger Hunger pangs go, yeah, yeah.  </p>
<p>01:05:28:03 - 01:05:55:11<br>Sean<br>But yeah, it's like, um, it's changed. Like how I think about fitness and endurance and just like, getting through the day because I think with the natural, like, circadian rhythm of most people, you're kind of like supposed to be kind of feeling like, tired around like 2:00, 3:00, you're kind of like, your body's kind of like, okay, it's time to like.  </p>
<p>01:05:55:18 - 01:06:16:00<br>Sean<br>But then you identify, like, have one of these like 2:00, which I usually do. I'm like, ready to go? I got like, I'm good. I'm like, I don't really need. And it's amazing that it's like also if you jerk in in the morning, like first thing in the morning, which I usually do, is like, sometimes I don't even feel like I need to have coffee.  </p>
<p>01:06:16:02 - 01:06:29:19<br>Sean<br>It's like I'm not actually tired, I'm just dehydrated. That's the other one is like, Wow. Cause I mean, I still love coffee, but I like, I, uh, I drink sad coffee.  </p>
<p>01:06:29:22 - 01:06:30:08<br>Marty<br>What's that?  </p>
<p>01:06:30:08 - 01:06:45:11<br>Sean<br>It's like, that's what my brother's wife calls it. Like, I'll just have a glass of whole milk and, like, instant coffee and, like, maple sirup, and I'll microwave it.  </p>
<p>01:06:45:13 - 01:06:48:10<br>Marty<br>That's disgusting. It's that I said.  </p>
<p>01:06:48:13 - 01:06:52:09  </p>
<p>It's got.  </p>
<p>01:06:52:11 - 01:07:02:20<br>Sean<br>But it's fast. Like, I'm just like, I don't want to, I don't know. I'm just like, lazy with the drip too. Or like, French press. I probably should just do one of those. But I'm just like.  </p>
<p>01:07:02:23 - 01:07:05:26<br>Marty<br>It takes 5 minutes for a pot of coffee. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:07:05:29 - 01:07:08:24<br>Sean<br>But now I've just. I've been drinking a lot of milk.  </p>
<p>01:07:08:26 - 01:07:09:16<br>Marty<br>Raw milk.  </p>
<p>01:07:09:16 - 01:07:10:11<br>Sean<br>I wish I.  </p>
<p>01:07:10:15 - 01:07:11:00<br>Marty<br>The raw milk.  </p>
<p>01:07:11:01 - 01:07:14:13<br>Sean<br>I want to get on the raw milk, but I've just been doing the whole.  </p>
<p>01:07:14:15 - 01:07:17:23<br>Marty<br>Whole milk at the raw milk. So a big upgrade.  </p>
<p>01:07:17:24 - 01:07:18:17<br>Sean<br>You get it.  </p>
<p>01:07:18:19 - 01:07:32:12<br>Marty<br>Yeah. They sell it here in Austin. That's how I broke my sensitive, raw milk. Three raw eggs and raw eggs. Yeah. Roll raw eggs. I'm going to Texas to get a southern draw.  </p>
<p>01:07:32:14 - 01:07:34:19<br>Sean<br>And you get the cowboy boots.  </p>
<p>01:07:34:22 - 01:07:57:14<br>Marty<br>And you get the cowboy boots. I need a hat from a deep eddy cabaret, especially a northerner in Texas. Is this. Is this the look of somebody who was transplanted here? Logan All right, drink. So to Taco Slushy, if you want to. 50% off.  </p>
<p>01:07:57:19 - 01:08:01:19<br>Sean<br>Yeah, definitely do that. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:08:01:22 - 01:08:04:06<br>Marty<br>Anything else we should tell the freaks.  </p>
<p>01:08:04:08 - 01:08:07:20<br>Sean<br>Oh, just talk about, uh, Jack Dorsey story. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:08:07:23 - 01:08:09:29<br>Marty<br>I think we can end it with the Jack Dorsey story.  </p>
<p>01:08:10:05 - 01:08:31:12<br>Sean<br>All right, So last year, I started that, you know, a surf sabbatical, and I was in Costa Rica, and I. I sat down at dinner, and. And I caught him. I see him at the table next to me, and I'm like, I'm like, looking across the table in my body.  </p>
<p>01:08:31:12 - 01:08:39:24  </p>
<p>I was like, Y'all, that's Jack Dorsey. He's what's it like, 11, That girl. Oh, my God. Smoke.  </p>
<p>01:08:39:27 - 01:09:02:27<br>Sean<br>And And then, like, nothing happens, Whatever. But then the next day I see him again at this reggae club. I think this place actually down. But like, the whole town goes to this, this reggae club. And so I like, go in and I see him and I was like, with this girl. And I was like.  </p>
<p>01:09:02:28 - 01:09:04:12  </p>
<p>Oh my God, he's.  </p>
<p>01:09:04:15 - 01:09:21:11<br>Sean<br>And he had like a bunch of cute girls around and like, he had, like, security and he was by like, the exit, you know, he was like, he had his own, like entrance and exit that he, there was like private little corner. And I was like, oh, man, I want to like, just say, What's up to this guy?  </p>
<p>01:09:21:13 - 01:09:32:08<br>Sean<br>Like, I but I don't want to be like, I don't want to be that meme of the guy that's like screaming into the girl's ear, like trying to, like, say, like, yo, like.  </p>
<p>01:09:32:10 - 01:09:34:04<br>Marty<br>There's only 21 million Bitcoin. You got to be.  </p>
<p>01:09:34:04 - 01:09:35:29  </p>
<p>Like, What's up, dude? You know.  </p>
<p>01:09:36:01 - 01:09:56:26<br>Sean<br>I just I didn't know. I didn't want to, like, do that. It was so loud. So I'm like, How am I even going to talk to this guy? It's like, so fucking loud. And, and so then I'm like, I'm like dancing, like, girl. I'm like, having a good time. I'm like, kind of, like forgetting about it. And then, like, so at some point, she, like, drags me, like, closer to him.  </p>
<p>01:09:56:26 - 01:10:18:04<br>Sean<br>And then at one point I'm like, you know, arm's length away. And I was just like, I got to like, say, What's up? Like, I got to say something and I'm like, thinking of myself. Like, what the hell am I going to say to this guy? And I just like, I just kind of like, leaned in. And at one point I was like, Yo, Jack, love what you're doing for Bitcoin, man.  </p>
<p>01:10:18:06 - 01:10:20:00<br>Sean<br>And he just.  </p>
<p>01:10:20:03 - 01:10:22:19  </p>
<p>He was like, Yo, thank you, thank you.  </p>
<p>01:10:22:22 - 01:10:24:23<br>Sean<br>I appreciate that. He was like.  </p>
<p>01:10:24:26 - 01:10:30:16  </p>
<p>Well, what's your name? Like, I'm Sean. He's like, I'm Jack. I was like, Yeah. I was like.  </p>
<p>01:10:30:19 - 01:10:59:24<br>Sean<br>Um, and then like, right after that, he just kind of like he, he like, looked at, like his, like security and like bouncers and just kind of gave him, like, a nod, like, Yo, this guys, this guy's fine. Like, don't fucking kill this guy. And the rest of the night, we're just like, you know, like, shoulder to shoulder, like, he just kind of, like, welcomes me into his, like, circle of of, like, hot babes and, like, we're just, like, shoulder to shoulder dancing like the rest of the night.  </p>
<p>01:10:59:24 - 01:11:10:19<br>Sean<br>It was, like, so awesome. And, uh, yeah, that was it. I didn't get a picture or nothing. I was just like, You got a good story. I got a great story. And it was a great memory. Yeah. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:11:10:22 - 01:11:36:27<br>Marty<br>Do you live a wildlife, sir? It's funny, coming from your basement apartment in Chicago to, uh, bumping elbows with Jack Dorsey, The this story might be the funniest thing. The fact that you were in the war room in Venezuela the week before the El Salvador. El Salvador, um, before they launched the, uh, the Bitcoin law. Yeah. The fact that you were in that room, my mind.  </p>
<p>01:11:36:27 - 01:11:38:03<br>Marty<br>But I'm happy you were.  </p>
<p>01:11:38:05 - 01:11:41:08<br>Sean<br>Yeah. I don't know what I was doing. I got the picture to prove that you had a lot of stories.  </p>
<p>01:11:41:08 - 01:11:47:29<br>Marty<br>Jeremy Shockey, Athena, Jack Dorsey, Bailey starting a electrolytes company.  </p>
<p>01:11:48:01 - 01:11:49:08<br>Sean<br>Yeah. For the freaks.  </p>
<p>01:11:49:10 - 01:11:56:02<br>Marty<br>For the freaks? Yeah. Some of the earth for the freaks. Drinks, dotcom, slash the FTC peace of love receptacle, liquor.</p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:image href="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/477-Sean-McDonnell.png"/>
      </item>
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Story Of The People And Projects That Inspired Bitcoin | Aaron van Wirdum]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[This episode of TFTC with Marty and guest Aaron van Wirdum delves into the prehistory of Bitcoin, discussing the genesis of the ideas, technologies, and economic theories that paved the way for the emergence of the first successful decentralized digital currency.]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode of TFTC with Marty and guest Aaron van Wirdum delves into the prehistory of Bitcoin, discussing the genesis of the ideas, technologies, and economic theories that paved the way for the emergence of the first successful decentralized digital currency.]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:42:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iothe-genesis-book-aaron-van-wirdum/</link>
      <comments>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iothe-genesis-book-aaron-van-wirdum/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qqexsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7argv5kkwetwv4ekjuedvfhk76edv9shymmw94mxzm3dwa5hyer4d5hsygpgy34wakm8efaj2qwtvkqdcqktz2cze2kw68mjnwmpjhgx9vgg45psgqqqw4rskp0mp6</guid>
      <category>TFTC Podcast</category>
      
        <media:content url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/476-Aaron-van-Wirdum.png" medium="image"/>
        <enclosure 
          url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/476-Aaron-van-Wirdum.png" length="0" 
          type="image/png" 
        />
      <noteId>naddr1qqexsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7argv5kkwetwv4ekjuedvfhk76edv9shymmw94mxzm3dwa5hyer4d5hsygpgy34wakm8efaj2qwtvkqdcqktz2cze2kw68mjnwmpjhgx9vgg45psgqqqw4rskp0mp6</noteId>
      <npub>npub19qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksn4zc3g</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrib]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/the-genesis-book-aaron-van-wirdum/">Read original post</a></p>
<h3><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h3>
<p>This episode of TFTC with Marty and guest Aaron van Wirdum delves into the prehistory of Bitcoin, discussing the genesis of the ideas, technologies, and economic theories that paved the way for the emergence of the first successful decentralized digital currency. The episode covers a range of topics from the significance of River and Crowdhealth as sponsors, to the rich history of the cypherpunk movement, the milestones in digital cash development, and the pivotal role played by various figures in shaping what ultimately became Bitcoin.</p>
<p>Aaron's new book, "The Genesis Book," is highlighted as an essential read for understanding the narrative and the people behind the inspirations that led to Bitcoin. The conversation takes a deep dive into the intricacies of the technology and economics of digital cash, tracing back to the hacker culture at MIT, the birth of public key cryptography, and the ideological underpinnings from figures like Friedrich Hayek. Aaron recounts the frustrations of early cypherpunks with centralized digital cash systems like David Chaum's eCash and how innovations like Adam Back's Hashcash contributed to the concept of digital scarcity, a key element in Bitcoin's design.</p>
<p>The discussion also touches on Bitcoin's unique value proposition that got the incentives right, ensuring its adoption and success, unlike its predecessors. It reflects on the initial skepticism towards Bitcoin within the cypherpunk community and how Hal Finney's enthusiasm and contributions were instrumental in the early days following Satoshi Nakamoto's announcement of Bitcoin on the cryptography mailing list.</p>
<h3><strong>Links</strong></h3>
<p>Aaron on <a href="https://twitter.com/AaronvanW?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>The <a href="http://thegenesisbook.com/?ref=tftc.io">Genesis Book</a></p>
<h3><strong>Best Quotes</strong></h3>
<ol>
<li>"Bitcoin is the first one that actually works. It's not the first one; it's the first one that got it right." – Aaron van Wirdum, emphasizing that while Bitcoin was not the first attempt at digital cash, it was the first to successfully address the challenges faced by earlier projects.</li>
<li>"If bitcoin succeeds, then I would really expect future historians to look back on these guys [the cypherpunks] like Americans in particular, sort of look back on the founding fathers." – Aaron van Wirdum, drawing a parallel between the influence of the cypherpunks on digital currency and the impact of the founding fathers on American history.</li>
<li>"I think bitcoin, let's say money, is an important tool for humanity, right? Arguably the most important tool." – Aaron van Wirdum, highlighting the significance of money as a tool for human society and the potential of Bitcoin as a breakthrough in this domain.</li>
</ol>
<h3>Sponsors</h3>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3>
<p>The podcast episode with Aaron van Wirdum provides a fascinating exploration of the roots of Bitcoin, shedding light on the collective efforts and revolutionary ideas that culminated in the creation of a decentralized digital currency. Aaron's insights and historical accounts offer a compelling narrative that is not only educational but also deeply inspiring, revealing the dedication and vision of the individuals who played a role in Bitcoin's inception.</p>
<p>The overarching message is clear: Bitcoin is not merely a technological marvel; it is the result of a philosophical and economic evolution that has been brewing for decades. The potential implications for future discussions include a deeper appreciation of the historical context of Bitcoin and an understanding that its success was not accidental but the outcome of getting the incentives right.</p>
<p>By engaging with this history, listeners and readers are invited to reflect on the importance of remembering and learning from the past to better appreciate the present and influence the future – a future that may very well be shaped by Bitcoin and the principles it stands for.</p>
<h3>Timestamps</h3>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>6:32 - Storytime with Marty<br>13:00 - Genesis book<br>16:15 - Where does Bitcoin’s history begin?<br>19:43 - Cypherpunk history<br>27:50 - Who are the OGs?<br>31:05 - Precursor projects and culture<br>35:53 - Hashcash, BitGold, B-Money<br>43:11 - Demand for privacy tech<br>52:18 - Whitepaper and genesis block<br>1:00:06 - Cypherpunks today<br>1:03:52 - Timing and Chaum<br>1:09:51 - Free banking, extropians, AI<br>1:20:01 - Pitching the book</p>
<h3>Transcript</h3>
<p>00:00:02:28 - 00:00:07:27<br>Marty<br>Aaron, It's a long time coming. Is your first time on taxi, which is embarrassing on my part.  </p>
<p>00:00:08:00 - 00:00:15:25<br>Aaron<br>It is. Yeah. We came close. One time in New York, I think, but I wasn't close enough to actually come on the show. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:00:15:27 - 00:00:16:15<br>Marty<br>Now, I think.  </p>
<p>00:00:16:15 - 00:00:27:04<br>Aaron<br>David was on. David Bailey was on. And I think you're DMS me, but I was like, not actually the physical building or something. I recall something. But yeah, this the first time.  </p>
<p>00:00:27:04 - 00:00:32:21<br>Marty<br>Around that was a consensus. 2019, I think maybe 2018.  </p>
<p>00:00:32:23 - 00:00:35:02<br>Aaron<br>One of these, Yeah. Yes.  </p>
<p>00:00:35:04 - 00:01:00:21<br>Marty<br>I think it was really it's for 2017 because they're still somewhat bull vibes. So I think it was 2018. But I'm happy we're doing this now. We're here to talk about your new book, The Genesis book, The Story of the People and projects inspired Bitcoin. But before we get to that, I wanted to walk you through a pivotal point of my Bitcoin story that you were involved in, which revolves around the Bitcoins.  </p>
<p>00:01:00:24 - 00:01:22:06<br>Marty<br>Moby Dick research that Laurent did into the spamming attack on the Bitcoin network went on 2015 2016. I don't know if you recall, but we put together a Slack channel and at one point it was me, you and him trying to dissect the chain data of the spam attack, and I had no idea what I was looking at.  </p>
<p>00:01:22:06 - 00:01:29:28<br>Marty<br>But you and Laurent were were conversing back and forth, and I was just observing from afar of you guys diving into this data.  </p>
<p>00:01:30:00 - 00:01:39:25<br>Aaron<br>I do remember this. I definitely remember the term. You mentioned the Moby Dick spammer. And I remember did I write an article about it in the end? Probably right?  </p>
<p>00:01:39:27 - 00:01:43:15<br>Marty<br>I think so. I think Laurent wrote a series on it as well.  </p>
<p>00:01:43:17 - 00:01:57:01<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, I don't remember the actual details, but I just remember that this happened. Yeah, but I couldn't tell you anything about it anymore. I just. The name rings a bell and I know I was sort of there for. It's. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:01:57:04 - 00:02:24:21<br>Marty<br>Yeah. From right, from what I recall leading up to the fork wars, obviously the fourth wars revolved around the fact that Bitcoin fees were high. When you to increase blocs. One faction thought in Laurent and basically identified that somebody was spamming the mempool with 564 set transactions and he was using. Alex taught me to visualize that we were in the Slack channel.  </p>
<p>00:02:24:24 - 00:02:34:09<br>Marty<br>And for me that was pivotal in my point, really like diving into chain data and better understanding like the nuances of suitcases and how they can affect the free market.  </p>
<p>00:02:34:11 - 00:02:57:09<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, yeah. I mean, there was a lot of shenanigans going on around that time, including these spam attacks, to sort of make the blocks look for, even though they weren't really at the time. I definitely remember all that kind of stuff going on, which ironically kind of proved the point of why you need a block size limit because otherwise just spam blocks to infinite sizes.  </p>
<p>00:02:57:09 - 00:03:04:04<br>Aaron<br>So yeah, yeah. At least with the block size limits, it's expensive to do it like.  </p>
<p>00:03:04:06 - 00:03:27:03<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And at this time I think it was 27 or 28 I thought was so cool and I was in the Slack channel with you. Yeah, I think I've been following you for almost a decade now in what you've been doing, writing about Bitcoin, everything you've done in Bitcoin magazine. And I was just like, Oh my God, I mean, this selection with an Aaron Venn weirdo and Laurent, like, digging to this chain there that I've no idea what what is what it's saying to me.  </p>
<p>00:03:27:05 - 00:03:28:18<br>Aaron<br>Mm hmm.  </p>
<p>00:03:28:21 - 00:03:36:02<br>Marty<br>Um, in a pivotal part of my Bitcoin's strategy is being in that Slack channel with you and observing.  </p>
<p>00:03:36:04 - 00:03:37:09<br>Aaron<br>Cool.  </p>
<p>00:03:37:11 - 00:03:38:13<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:03:38:15 - 00:03:49:09<br>Aaron<br>So, yeah, I. Like I said, you have a better memory of those events that I, if I remember, it happens. But that's, that's pretty much, um.  </p>
<p>00:03:49:11 - 00:04:13:18<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I mean, you've probably forgotten more than people have ever known about Bitcoin and most people on the planet, with all the research that you've done, all the writings that you've done, all the research that you've done, not only into Bitcoin itself, but with this book, the Genesis book, Digging into the History of the Precursors Technologies, an economic theory that led to Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:04:13:20 - 00:04:16:16<br>Marty<br>What what's it been like? I have a space.  </p>
<p>00:04:16:18 - 00:04:30:05<br>Aaron<br>I have forgotten more than most people know about Bitcoin. That's which is that I mean, that's probably true because most people don't know a lot about Bitcoin. Plus I have a bad memory, so it has to be true, but you just know it.  </p>
<p>00:04:30:08 - 00:04:40:15<br>Marty<br>Uh, so what's it been like covering the space for you in general? Yeah. What's it been like? Why do you cover it?  </p>
<p>00:04:40:17 - 00:05:17:07<br>Aaron<br>Like, why did I even start covering this? Yeah, I mean, I think Bitcoin, let's say money is an important tool for humanity. You're right. Arguably the most important tool. So I. I actually studied, like, political history. It's there's a longer name to it, but I was also sort of I was always interested in sort of how do people organize so how do society organize, you know, what political systems have been tried, economic theories like it was sort of always something I found interesting.  </p>
<p>00:05:17:10 - 00:05:45:22<br>Aaron<br>And even before Bitcoin, I had gotten interested in both finance, like the whole financial crisis had been happening, of course. So that sort of attracted my attention. But then also the free and open source software movement, which had its own kind of ideals, the old way of cooperating, which I also describe in my book for a part and with Bitcoin, these two really came together.  </p>
<p>00:05:45:22 - 00:06:21:00<br>Aaron<br>It's an open source forum of money, and that just blew my mind. Like while everyone was talking about either forming banks or especially in the United States, maybe ending the feds and Bitcoin just sort of did it. And for me that feels like a very interesting and potentially incredibly important breakthrough that I at first I wanted to just write a couple of articles or started with one, but then, you know, the more I learned, the more I realized that this is just got to be my career.  </p>
<p>00:06:21:00 - 00:06:30:02<br>Aaron<br>Now, I started that blog at first and then a new site and started freelancing for Bitcoin Publications. And I'm still here now. I wrote a book. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:06:30:04 - 00:06:53:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Well, it's a good lay up too, to talk about the book. I think that's one of the misconceptions around Bitcoin from people who aren't really involved and are looking at it from the outside in. They see it as this technology that came out of nowhere and many have equated it to the MySpace of the cryptocurrency space. But what you're diving into here in the Genesis book is that's not true.  </p>
<p>00:06:53:29 - 00:07:25:15<br>Marty<br>Bitcoin is really the culmination of almost a century of advances and in political theory, economic theory and then computer science as well. Many, many tried and failed to release digital currencies over the last three decades. And it wasn't until Satoshi gifted the world with the way paper and the protocol that we actually found a a digital currency that that seems to be working.  </p>
<p>00:07:25:17 - 00:07:49:22<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, for me personally, I knew about some of these earlier projects in the same way. I think many Bitcoiners especially these days will sort of note that there were these other projects, although when I started writing, I think that was still kind of a mystery for many people. There was still sort of this idea that Bitcoin really came out of nothing and like you just explained, it really didn't.  </p>
<p>00:07:49:24 - 00:08:07:03<br>Aaron<br>But even if, you know, it didn't like for me personally, a couple of years ago, I knew there was this thing called Bit Gold that Nick Szabo worked on and there was this hash cache and B money, which is mentioned in the white paper. But for me that was sort of it. There were like footnotes in the white paper.  </p>
<p>00:08:07:03 - 00:08:40:07<br>Aaron<br>There were there was this one page in a Bitcoin book that mentions decipher Pong two that mentions that there was this thing going on, these people before Bitcoin that were interested in this stuff, but that, that was sort of it. And for me at that point, I'd been writing about Bitcoin for multiple years. I've been exploring it through my articles myself, understanding how it all works, and also especially during the Blocksize wars, which you mentioned, kind of being in the middle of this debate about the future of Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:08:40:09 - 00:09:02:18<br>Aaron<br>So I was really covering it intensely for years and at some point I felt like I want to know more about what is actually came from. I want to know more about what is this actual prehistory that that's sort of alluded to in this one page in the chapter, one of this other Bitcoin book. Like what? What are they actually talking about?  </p>
<p>00:09:02:18 - 00:09:27:28<br>Aaron<br>What are what is the story here? What did drive these people? So that's what I set out to do. For the past couple of years. I've been working on this book for a couple of years. In the meantime, I also published several articles, sort of standalone articles on the specific digital cash projects that came before Bitcoin. These were called the Genesis Files, and now we had the Genesis book really kind of tries to wrap it all in.  </p>
<p>00:09:27:28 - 00:09:42:12<br>Aaron<br>One big story also includes a lot more of the economic foundations of Bitcoin and how that all sort of interplays and ultimately led to Bitcoin. That's, that's the goal anyway. So that's what I set out to do.  </p>
<p>00:09:42:15 - 00:09:54:28<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So how far back does this go? Where do you draw the line of like, all right, here's the first step toward bitcoin. What part of history?  </p>
<p>00:09:55:00 - 00:10:05:22<br>Aaron<br>Yeah. So it starts with the Arabs inventing zero. No, that's, that's actually that's actually a Dilbert comic joke. You know this?  </p>
<p>00:10:05:24 - 00:10:06:25<br>Marty<br>No.  </p>
<p>00:10:06:27 - 00:10:31:27<br>Aaron<br>It's his Dilbert comic where someone asks, Okay, explain blockchain to me. And then that's where he starts with the invention of zero. Explain it to me, but don't give me the I don't remember the exact joke. Anyways, so actually, I start my book. So there's two starting points in my book. Essentially, it starts with two legs, if you will.  </p>
<p>00:10:31:29 - 00:10:58:22<br>Aaron<br>Two There's two storylines in the book. One of them is really the economic part. So the book opens with Hayek, while not counting the introduction to the book opens with Hayek, and then in the first part of the book, I explore Hayek's thinking about money. And I choose high specifically because I think in different parts of his life it's ideas that are very relevant to Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:10:58:24 - 00:11:29:16<br>Aaron<br>Like early in his career, he was sort of musing about this neutral money, which would be a currency with a limited supply that could be used internationally, borderless, and so very much resembles Bitcoin later in his career, he proposes that money should be left to the free markets, and then even later in his career, he sees the only way to enable that is to create something that governments can stop.  </p>
<p>00:11:29:16 - 00:12:01:16<br>Aaron<br>There's this famous Hayek quote that many Bitcoiners will have heard. So Hayek sort of has this recurring role in my book, and that's one side of the story. And then the other side of the story starts with the emergence of the hacker culture. So starts with at MIT, essentially where, you know, the first computers are brought on campus and hacker culture emerges, which is really based on this idea of sharing that code and free software and open source software comes from that.  </p>
<p>00:12:01:18 - 00:12:24:28<br>Aaron<br>And this storyline proceeds with the invention of public key cryptography, and it all sort of starts to merge with the Cypherpunk. So in the cypherpunk tried to create digital cash. Some of them, you know, I already briefly mentioned like Nick Szabo's Bitcoin and there was health benefits. ARPA y would be money, which is referenced in the white paper.  </p>
<p>00:12:25:00 - 00:12:49:02<br>Aaron<br>So this at this point the cyber punks want to create digital cash and they're really inspired, I would say, by this to different kind of ideological movements that sort of become one at that point. Also in the book, at that points in the book, it sort of becomes a more singular storyline with these different projects sort of following each other up.  </p>
<p>00:12:49:05 - 00:13:13:27<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, and that's to give you a specific like beginning date. The like the Hayek storyline starts basically in the twenties, 1920s, although even there they're sort of like this flashback, which goes a bit further into history, like where Austrian economics sort of emerges. So that's 19th century. And then the tech track that sort of starts in the late fifties, early sixties.  </p>
<p>00:13:13:29 - 00:13:41:03<br>Marty<br>And it's fascinating because it seems having been in Bitcoin for ten years and looking back, it seems like I mean, I personally believe that we've been going astray as a society for the greater part of 100 years due to fiat money and central banks. And the implications of that are pretty massive as we talk about day in and day out within the Bitcoin community and more people are starting to talk about it more broadly.  </p>
<p>00:13:41:05 - 00:14:14:17<br>Marty<br>But the fact that it took sort of individuals and the economic theory realm and then individuals in the software development cryptography realm to really take it upon themselves to fix this problem is extremely inspiring, especially when you consider honing in on the Cypherpunk particularly they were working on this for decades and failing over and over again by failing forward with things like BGP and other cryptographic primitives and hash cache leading to Bitcoin eventually.  </p>
<p>00:14:14:17 - 00:14:33:19<br>Marty<br>And so how do you think the cypherpunk like how quickly do you think the cypherpunk when they initially set out on this journey to create a digital currency, how quickly do you think they believed it would take initially compared to how long it actually took leading up to Bitcoin's launch?  </p>
<p>00:14:33:21 - 00:15:01:13<br>Aaron<br>Well, first to remark on what you said, like it is an insanely inspiring story. And Detroit's especially let's just assume that Bitcoin sort of succeeds and we're not there yet. But if it does, it's such a major accomplishment of this small group of people. And it was a small group of people like it was, you know, in the hundreds, maybe at its very peak, there were like 2000 people on the Cypherpunk mailing list, but then most of them were just readers.  </p>
<p>00:15:01:20 - 00:15:25:25<br>Aaron<br>Like the people that were really driving it forward was such a small group. Like, if Bitcoin succeeds, then I would really expect future historians to look back on these guys, like Americans in particular, sort of look back on the Founding fathers. Right? It's it's it's a it's a small group that actually achieved something really massive, which is super interesting.  </p>
<p>00:15:25:27 - 00:15:30:21<br>Aaron<br>Now, I forgot your question. What was your actual question before I riffed on what what.  </p>
<p>00:15:30:21 - 00:15:39:01<br>Marty<br>Do you think their expectations were when they initially set out to launch a digital currency compared to how long it actually took?  </p>
<p>00:15:39:03 - 00:16:13:16<br>Aaron<br>Right. Well, keep in mind, so when the CYPHERPUNK started working on digital cash, digital cash kind of already existed, I want to say existed, even though that's a little bit of a shortcut. So yeah. David Chao. David Chao, cryptographer. He essentially invented digital cash in the eighties. And when I say digital cash in this context, I very specifically mean or he's very specifically meant a form of currency for the Internet that can be used anonymously.  </p>
<p>00:16:13:18 - 00:16:40:19<br>Aaron<br>So the strong emphasis for time in particular was on privacy and anonymity. He wasn't trying to like reinvent money or he wasn't a, you know, a gold GOLDBERG or none of that. He was just trying to achieve privacy. And this is also initially what attracted the first cypherpunk to digital cash technology. Now, it was in development at that time.  </p>
<p>00:16:40:19 - 00:17:07:00<br>Aaron<br>So Cypherpunk Swarm launched sort of 1992. At that point, David Gilmour already had his startup called Digital Cash in Amsterdam, which started in 1990. So when the Cypherpunk first thought about digital cash, they kind of thought about the thing David Gilmour's was building. That's, that's what inspired them and that's what they were trying to achieve, you could say.  </p>
<p>00:17:07:03 - 00:17:41:15<br>Aaron<br>So this was just centralized. It was a technology for banks, so banks could use it, offer it to their customers, and then the digital cash you had was basically, you know, had a one on one value backed by whatever fiat currency the bank had. So this existed. But. David Chapman, let's take some design decisions or his company was going in a certain direction or was making certain trade offs that not all the cypherpunk were very happy with.  </p>
<p>00:17:41:18 - 00:18:09:20<br>Aaron<br>So one of them was digital Cash was really sort of focusing on hardware modules. There was a strong focus on making payments in real life rather than over the internet, which sort of makes sense if you think back to the era, right, like early 1990s, most people didn't even have Internet yet. So the focus was on making, you know, in-person digital payments and making these anonymous.  </p>
<p>00:18:09:20 - 00:18:43:25<br>Aaron<br>So that was one of the focus that not all the cypherpunk were happy with default. You should just focus on, you know, Internet currency and focus on the crypto protocols. And then there was also an even bigger trade off which had to do with privacy, like in In Chumps model, the recipient of a transaction wasn't necessarily private to the sender because if the sender would collude with the bank, then they could sort of work together to, you know, anonymize the recipients.  </p>
<p>00:18:43:27 - 00:19:04:18<br>Aaron<br>And charm for it was probably a good trade off because that way extortion would be, you know, kind of impossible or, you know, other bad things would be harder to do if the recipient could be anonymized in the worst case scenario. So for banks had a more radical idea, they thought privacy is human rights should be much more absolute.  </p>
<p>00:19:04:20 - 00:19:29:16<br>Aaron<br>And whatever downsides come with that. That's just a tradeoff we have to make as society. Yes, it will be abused by, you know, terrorists or pedophiles. Yes, they will also abused this privacy in the same way that they're already abusing curtains. You can close your curtains and endorse. You can do whatever you want, and there's no, you know, police that can just come in.  </p>
<p>00:19:29:16 - 00:20:07:16<br>Aaron<br>They need a warrant like that. These are tradeoffs we make as a society. And so the cypherpunk to destroy data we should be making similar tradeoffs and we'll start to frustrate them. It's that they couldn't actually freely use the technology that Shome had developed. So there's this sort of irony that Chapman is electoral cash. Technology was a big inspiration for sci fi punks, but at the same time, the cyber punks also saw him as sort of holding up these developments because they couldn't create new forms of digital cash based on this same technology.  </p>
<p>00:20:07:18 - 00:20:30:24<br>Aaron<br>So really, for a couple of years, it was a very for a safe but very frustrating time where it seemed that this technology was sort of within reach, but they couldn't quite use it. They were trying to find ways around it, like they had this small kind of play currencies that were based on the same technology and they figured if it's not used, you know, commercially, then we won't get in too much trouble.  </p>
<p>00:20:30:27 - 00:20:53:20<br>Aaron<br>And then there were some cryptographers that were trying to make slightly different versions of charms, electronic cash, and figuring that maybe that way they could get around the patents. But for a couple of years it really sort of stalled and it wasn't going nowhere. And you could really see some of these guys like Adam Beck, like the the frustration was really growing for them.  </p>
<p>00:20:53:20 - 00:21:12:15<br>Aaron<br>I quote that in my book as well as how it wasn't really going anywhere. They were discussing if they should play ball, which I'll get is get his license. But yeah, it was stalling and it really the breakthrough happened with hash cash. So that was like between founding the site function 9 to 2 at creating hash cash. That was five years.  </p>
<p>00:21:12:15 - 00:21:21:00<br>Aaron<br>So there was five years of kind of frustration and stalling before there was this new insight of how it could actually potentially be done.  </p>
<p>00:21:21:02 - 00:21:46:23<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Before we dive in the hash cash, I think you stoked an idea in my mind, which is like laying the the groundwork for anybody listening to identify who you deem to be the equivalent of the Founding Fathers in the Cypherpunk movement specifically, and maybe a big ask to make your list of all out but in your mind, like the small group of people who were the most pivotal.  </p>
<p>00:21:46:28 - 00:21:48:27<br>Marty<br>Pivotal? Excuse me.  </p>
<p>00:21:48:29 - 00:22:17:15<br>Aaron<br>Oh, yeah, good question. I mean, Tim has to be on that list for sure. Tim, a super interesting guy, passed away a couple of years ago right before I could interview him. Unfortunately, I contacted him, but then he passed away. But he was very active. He was kind of the facto intellectual leader. MODERATOR Kind of very influential person on that list.  </p>
<p>00:22:17:16 - 00:22:40:05<br>Aaron<br>Not not certainly not the only one and definitely not some sort of official leader, because the cypherpunk sort of by design were just decentralized group or no one was in charge. There were no hierarchies. It was just this group of like minded people that shared a goal that met either in real life or on a mailing list to discuss their ideas or strategies.  </p>
<p>00:22:40:07 - 00:23:16:28<br>Aaron<br>But Tim was very pivotal. He was one of the founders and he was also the most active contributor to the mailing list where he would consistently share his ideas and what he expected cryptography to be able to achieve. And he in particular had a very radical interpretation of the potential of cryptography he saw. So he he wrote a crypto anarchist manifesto and which I have behind me on the poster, by the way, print printed out.  </p>
<p>00:23:17:01 - 00:23:52:18<br>Aaron<br>And he saw cryptography and digital cash in particular as tools to really undermine the state. It would allow people to not pay taxes, which would in turn lead to a tax revolt. And all of that also like secrets, it would be impossible to keep secrets. So including government secrets or big corporations, you couldn't keep secrets. And if you can't keep secrets, it's really hard to run a large corporation like that.  </p>
<p>00:23:52:21 - 00:24:22:02<br>Aaron<br>So he had these very radical ideas, but there were also moderates or more moderate cypherpunk out. Eric Use, for example, was a lot more moderate by each another co-founder John Gilmore and other co-founder. And then some of the more well-known guys in the individual space would, for example, be, you know, Nick Szabo, Salvini y di. They were all quite active on there as well.  </p>
<p>00:24:22:05 - 00:24:34:03<br>Aaron<br>But yeah, there were a whole bunch of people that were discussing these kinds of ideas and digital cache tools and also just general privacy technologies, of course.  </p>
<p>00:24:34:06 - 00:24:59:22<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And yes, yeah. And you have to imagine like a distributed workforce working on a combination of open source and closed source technologies aiming for this ideal. Like was there any similar type of software projects or movements like this before that Few if any. I imagine it's like Internet protocol stack, But.  </p>
<p>00:24:59:24 - 00:25:29:12<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, well as Phil Zimmermann, he was building PDP and he did start building that before the Cypherpunk existed. And then of course David Chown was building electronic cache as well before like he was the inspiration for Daft Punk's or one of the inspirations. So he was also building that before Cypherpunk. But in general, not really, or at least the types of tools that Cipher punks were developing.  </p>
<p>00:25:29:14 - 00:26:02:12<br>Aaron<br>So privacy tools essentially that didn't really exist yet before this idea. In fact, that's why the Cypherpunk were founded. That's why Tim May and Eric Fuchs and John Gilmore, why they wanted to founded Decipher Punks because there was this revolution in cryptography that had been happening since the seventies, 1970s. But to actually turn these crypto protocols into tools that people could use, that hadn't really happened yet.  </p>
<p>00:26:02:12 - 00:26:15:05<br>Aaron<br>So that's what I try to achieve and that's why they gathered this groups of hackers and friends and computer scientists to start building this and start realizing this.  </p>
<p>00:26:15:07 - 00:26:36:28<br>Marty<br>And in your research, going back and reading the mailing list and all the papers that were put out, what was I'm trying to get at is like, what was the what was it like the coordination efforts, like in the beginning? Did you see like the coordination of these projects evolve? So you imagine these people are doing this for the first time.  </p>
<p>00:26:36:28 - 00:26:59:04<br>Marty<br>It's never been done before. Outside of a few projects before the CYPHERPUNK is launched, like what was. And then you compare it to a project like Bitcoin Court today or Linux and all these other open source projects, like how, how much of a rough path that they have trying to learn how to coordinate and work on this together in a distributed fashion.  </p>
<p>00:26:59:06 - 00:27:30:21<br>Aaron<br>Well, at the very beginning they started to meet like at someone's apartment, right at Eric Lucas's apartment. And they were actually sort of roleplaying how electronic cash, for example, could operate or how like the precursor to Tor, like remodelers, how that would actually work. So they were sort of playing this out with physical envelopes and, you know, pieces of paper and monopoly money or whatever they were using to sort of play these actual games.  </p>
<p>00:27:30:23 - 00:27:40:26<br>Aaron<br>Yeah. On the mailing list I did. And good question. Like you mean the actual tech developments, right.  </p>
<p>00:27:40:28 - 00:27:55:18<br>Marty<br>Yeah. What I'm trying is like the culture like, like how did it sort of form and evolve around building these tools via mailing list and the combination of that meeting in person actually writing and testing code.  </p>
<p>00:27:55:20 - 00:28:32:23<br>Aaron<br>Yeah. Well I think it was around this same time. So around the cypherpunk era that Linux was also introduced and that really sort of reshaped the culture of how to cooperate on building software, open source software, specifically in general. Like before that there was still like free software exists, which is Stallman had been working on free software, but there was still this ethos of you need this sort of small group of experts to to build this and to fit it in to make sure it's bug free.  </p>
<p>00:28:32:23 - 00:29:09:19<br>Aaron<br>And this tended to happen in like computer environments, like computer labs at universities. And it was really with Linux that this kind of got flipped and it became just this collaborative model across the Internet where everyone could contribute. I would say the Cypherpunk mailing list specifically was more a place to sort of discuss designs and discuss ideas and discuss potential rather than a place where the actual developments happened.  </p>
<p>00:29:09:20 - 00:29:21:13<br>Aaron<br>It was more a place to sort of find each other and they did share software or they did share code, but it's not like it happened on the list itself. That was more a discussion forum type of situation.  </p>
<p>00:29:21:16 - 00:29:41:17<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And then bringing this back to the timeline of charms e cache, sort of frustrating people and then atom back releasing hash cache. Why was hash cache so pivotal on this journey towards Bitcoin in your opinion?  </p>
<p>00:29:41:20 - 00:30:12:12<br>Aaron<br>Yeah. So Adam Beck designed hash cache initially as postage, so it was meant to be postage and the reason so postage for the internet, for email essentially, and the reason that was very necessary at that time was because a, I mentioned that cypherpunk for using mailers. So this was a way to email someone anonymously, email someone without that person knowing that it was you who emailed them.  </p>
<p>00:30:12:15 - 00:30:44:22<br>Aaron<br>So these were cypherpunk tools that Cypherpunk were running, like they were running remodelers servers, but servers were increasingly being spammed. So there were, you know, basically some sort of denial of service attack seemed to be going on where, you know, thousands of emails were just being sent through the servers consisting of gibberish, it seemed like. And these servers became too expensive for some to actually operate.  </p>
<p>00:30:44:24 - 00:31:13:05<br>Aaron<br>So this is why the Cypherpunk specifically wanted to create something akin to digital postage is something that would come at a cost. So sorry, something that would make sending an email cost something. And they did think about using electronic cash for this like jobs. Electronic cash. Just put a little bit of cash in an email and only if it has this e cache in the email would you accept it or would the remainder accept it.  </p>
<p>00:31:13:07 - 00:31:38:03<br>Aaron<br>But ecos was not quite ready for this. It was not quite designed in such a way that it could be used for this. So then Adam Beck came up with this idea for hash cash, which in order to send an email, the sender would have to perform a little bit of proof of work. So, you know, your computer does a bunch of computational cycles to prove that you actually spent energy.  </p>
<p>00:31:38:05 - 00:32:12:06<br>Aaron<br>And then only if this proof of work was included in an email what the remainder accepted or what the recipient acceptance, what is really introduced. So this was the original intent for it for for cash. Cash. But what it introduced was digital scarcity, essentially, right? So some way to create something that's digital, but that proves some sort of expense of real world resources, real energy, real computing power.  </p>
<p>00:32:12:09 - 00:32:41:20<br>Aaron<br>And this really inspired a number of the cyber punks to take their thinking about electronic cash in a new direction. So where previously the idea was we're going to create this or cash is sort of operated by a bank and it's backed by fiat currency. Now, they really started to think more in this way of digital gold kind of thing, like maybe we can have a digital cash that's not backed by something else.  </p>
<p>00:32:41:20 - 00:33:11:10<br>Aaron<br>So they were having these discussions on the Cypherpunk mailing list, some of which I detail in my book about whether digital cash actually needs to be backed, whether it just needs to be limited to it, or whether it should be considered cash if it's not backed or evidence backed or so there were starting to really consider this. And when hash cash was introduced a year later, you see these other digital cash protocols being proposed.  </p>
<p>00:33:11:10 - 00:33:43:25<br>Aaron<br>So the most notable ones are the examples Bitcoin TED White eyes B money, which both both used is scarcity. There's provable scarcity, there's proof of work as sort of the foundation, the fundaments for that digital cash projects. Now these digital cash frauds have other problems, but you can really see this thinking to be embraced and sort of taking the whole concept of electronic cash in a in a new direction from that point out.  </p>
<p>00:33:43:27 - 00:33:49:11<br>Marty<br>And did I forget typical old or B money never leave the idea phase or they.  </p>
<p>00:33:49:14 - 00:34:14:10<br>Aaron<br>No, no they were both just proposals. They were they were proposed very briefly after one another. I was only like a month in between them, but yet both had, Wolf, fundamental problems. And maybe that's why they weren't like they couldn't have been implemented, basically. Or, you know, you could have sort of tried, but there were very real problems that were unsolved still.  </p>
<p>00:34:14:12 - 00:34:39:06<br>Aaron<br>So, yeah, they were only ever ideas, proposals where Bitcoin is is a pretty, I would say relatively detailed proposal B money is a little bit more had to wavy like that. B money is an even rougher idea that bit goals. But yeah, both of them were not implemented.  </p>
<p>00:34:39:09 - 00:35:03:09<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I discuss B money with Drew Bansal from Unchained probably about a month, month and a half ago. Now at this point we were he was explaining how the auction to create B money really doomed it from the beginning because you didn't really have this fixed supply that people could anchor to sort of had figured out a way to coordinate these auctions, to birth the supply into existence, Right?  </p>
<p>00:35:03:09 - 00:35:46:06<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, I would say b b money was it was an interesting idea. It was sort of almost why I kind of thinking out loud is how I sort of read it. He by the time he published B Money, he had grown sort of disillusioned with the whole digital cash movement, actually, or with the whole Cypherpunk movement, even because he, he felt that all these tools, that cipher banks were developing and all the ways they were thinking about improving privacy, it turned out that no one was interested, Right?  </p>
<p>00:35:46:06 - 00:36:08:11<br>Aaron<br>The Internet's had by this time started to become a real thing, and no one was using any of these privacy tools to the cypherpunk, you know, were putting their heart and soul in. No, no, no one gave a damn. So he also expected that even if they could realize digital cash, probably no one would even use it because.  </p>
<p>00:36:08:11 - 00:36:32:09<br>Aaron<br>People are perfectly, perfectly comfortable using credit cards or PayPal or whatever, you know, privacy infringing technologies are out there. So what's the point? Sort of. So my reading of the situation is that y I had been thinking about it for a while and at some point he kind of grew disillusioned and he just sort of said, All right, here's what I got so far.  </p>
<p>00:36:32:12 - 00:36:42:12<br>Aaron<br>If someone wants to take this ball and run with it, go ahead. But it was still far from a finished protocol, but it had some interesting ideas for sure.  </p>
<p>00:36:42:15 - 00:37:08:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And how much do you think that disillusionment on the part of way DI, was, the fact that he was so close to everything going on, almost following this for years it didn't seem like there was mainstream adoption or even appetite to adopt like how much of that was just a product of how nation the internet was and consumers access to the Internet was at that time?  </p>
<p>00:37:08:17 - 00:37:41:01<br>Aaron<br>Well, I would say that in recent years we've seen a bit of a resurgence of, you know, sort of the cypherpunk ethos. Right. And Part of this is Bitcoin itself. But you also see you see it in other domains as well. You know, we we have signaled these days WhatsApp like implement cryptography. So clearly people at least pretends to care, companies at least pretends to care, which probably means there's at least some market demand for it like people.  </p>
<p>00:37:41:08 - 00:38:16:13<br>Aaron<br>Also, the Snowden revelations, of course, were big part of that, think it's it's re-inspired thinking about privacy technologies or the lack thereof. But yeah if you recall definitely like the late nineties early 2000s when the Internet was still pretty new, privacy was just not a topic that anyone really seemed to care about or mind. And so I can certainly see, you know, the cypherpunk that was there very early to the to the Internet.  </p>
<p>00:38:16:13 - 00:38:32:18<br>Aaron<br>And then when the masses sort of come and no one cares about what they thought everyone would care about that, that must be a very disappointing realization. And it was for many of them. So yeah, the Cypherpunk movement sort of dissolved around that time.  </p>
<p>00:38:32:21 - 00:38:55:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So this was like 1998 when B money was released. I'm sure there's a bunch of where the idea was released. There was probably discussion for some amount of time and then obviously there's a ten year gap between that and Bitcoin. The Bitcoin white paper appearing on the on the mailing list in October of 2008 and what happened between that ten year period that.  </p>
<p>00:38:55:17 - 00:38:55:27<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, well.  </p>
<p>00:38:55:27 - 00:38:58:13<br>Marty<br>Their disillusionment if you will.  </p>
<p>00:38:58:15 - 00:39:30:12<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, well there's one more interesting digital cash project in between these which I highlight in my book. I will also say there were a lot of sort of electronic cash systems in name only during that time. So there were a lot of start ups and yeah, technology companies that were selling or introducing something which they called cash the Internet in some way or another.  </p>
<p>00:39:30:15 - 00:39:57:00<br>Aaron<br>But it, it didn't have any privacy future stuff for sure. So in whatever way, whatever they associated with cash, probably something like fast and cheap transactions. But privacy was just not part of any of these designs. But the interesting sort of cypherpunk technology late, very late cypherpunk technology that still came out in between B money and Bitcoin was ARPA.  </p>
<p>00:39:57:05 - 00:40:25:29<br>Aaron<br>So how very, very telling for his character probably he sort of kept his hand to shut them up. He, he was always very interested in new digital cash projects that were introduced on the Cypherpunk mailing list. It was very often sort of the first to jump on it, try to understand it, and came back to the mailing list, sort of try to explain it in his own words to other people on that list.  </p>
<p>00:40:26:02 - 00:40:57:23<br>Aaron<br>So he was a very prominent figure there, especially in this electronic cash sort of subsegment of the Cypherpunk community. And he he deeply he was still motivated and it was almost certainly one of the very few like, I think Nick Szabo when I spoke with him, he said his estimation were that there were maybe like three or four people so interested in this, like by The Smiths through thousands, but Delphine was definitely one of them.  </p>
<p>00:40:57:26 - 00:41:41:00<br>Aaron<br>He was still interested in specifically kind of realizing bits gold and B money type of ideas. Now what he actually built was what he called a very simplified version of Bitcoin, at which it had to be because Bitcoin was quite complex. There's like different layers to that design. So ARPA was a very simplified white version, but it was kind of interesting that it leveraged sort of the transparency of free software so that you even have any couldn't cheat because it was a centralized system.  </p>
<p>00:41:41:03 - 00:42:02:13<br>Aaron<br>So it sort of went back from decentralized proposals like B money and Bitcoin sort of for and then it went back to our power, which was centralized. But how many used a remote attestation technology, which was a special IBM chip in combination with free software to sort of prove that the protocol did exactly what it had to do.  </p>
<p>00:42:02:20 - 00:42:29:05<br>Aaron<br>Very relevant idea for Bitcoin as well. Of course. So so this technology came somewhere in between and interestingly, it was also actually implemented. So it did work. It was really a thing people could use. A kind of interesting. Is that correct? Maxwell was also one of the contributors to this project because developers, of course, but it never really caught on.  </p>
<p>00:42:29:07 - 00:42:57:16<br>Aaron<br>This is probably in large part because ARPA didn't have a solution for the inflation problem. So the currency was created with proof of work. But as computers become faster over time, it becomes easier to create proof of work. So you sort of have this intrinsic inflation because of that. And, you know, if you know that your money is going to inflate, it's not very strong incentive to want to accept it, of course.  </p>
<p>00:42:57:16 - 00:43:09:06<br>Aaron<br>So that's probably a big reason why ARPA didn't take off, or at least that's what I think that's what Maxwell thinks as well. But it it's operated work for a while.  </p>
<p>00:43:09:09 - 00:43:46:20<br>Marty<br>So that gets to the question of what is the core innovation of Bitcoin And that's again, go back to the conversation with Dhruv. He wrote a piece recently that really puts the case forward that digital scarcity and fixed supply 21 million with a predetermined supply schedule. Release schedule is the key innovation. Obviously with the combination of proof of work, with the difficulty adjustment in leveraging EDSA to create private public key pairs, all that combined really allowed Bitcoin to succeed in the way that it has over the first 15 years.  </p>
<p>00:43:46:20 - 00:43:54:09<br>Marty<br>But it was really that last piece of the puzzle figuring out like, Hey, we need a fixed supply out of the gate that's predetermined.  </p>
<p>00:43:54:11 - 00:44:18:09<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, I think the big thing Bitcoin did was getting the incentives right. And as I mentioned, ARPA basically works like if you just wanted to use digital cash on our POW, it works or even e cash, you know, the technology works, but also your cash was not adopted probably for the same reason. Like there's no strong incentive to adopt e cash like some people care about privacy.  </p>
<p>00:44:18:09 - 00:44:59:12<br>Aaron<br>Sure. But a lot of people don't care about privacy. While, you know, if there's a monetary or if there's a financial incentive to adopt that currency, well, now all of a sudden, a lot more people will care. So I also think that's that's a big piece of the puzzle that Satoshi sort of got. Right. If you look at these different electronic cash projects that preceded Bitcoin, then almost all different parts of the puzzle are there in one of them, like Bitcoin is already very much has something that starts to resemble a blockchain with like this chain of hashes essentially.  </p>
<p>00:44:59:14 - 00:45:33:26<br>Aaron<br>B Money already introduced this idea that everyone should run their own node in a way that everyone should keep track of. Everyone else's balances are powerful leverage is this free software idea that anyone can check the code. Of course, hash guys is proof of work like a lot of these tools. Or were there a lot of the parts of the puzzle were there and Satoshi definitely, in my view, was all he put it together in a way that's not just very elegant, but also the incentives.  </p>
<p>00:45:33:26 - 00:45:50:07<br>Aaron<br>Now, for the first time aligned, there was actually a reason for people to want to get some of these coins because the value might go up. And that's that's a big motivator to get digital cash, even if you don't care about the privacy aspect of it. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:45:50:10 - 00:46:14:20<br>Marty<br>And when Satoshi hit the mailing list with the white paper in October of oh eight, in your mind, how did this what reaction that this cause the greater cypherpunk movement to have? Obviously how funny was in early I was way I was highly skeptical in the beginning. What was the reemergence of this idea of digital cash in the way that Satoshi brought it back?  </p>
<p>00:46:14:22 - 00:46:18:05<br>Marty<br>How did it sort of disrupts that that community?  </p>
<p>00:46:18:08 - 00:46:49:29<br>Aaron<br>Right. Well, you mentioned wide I he was emailed before it even hit the mailing list. So both at back and wide, I were reached out to privately but by Satoshi and both of them weren't were weren't buying it so to say which to a large extent has to do with the dissolution meant that I already mentioned and also there had been so many digital cash products that just went nowhere.  </p>
<p>00:46:50:02 - 00:47:18:00<br>Aaron<br>So it's very understandable. I would say, you know, someone you've never heard of reaches out, says I've, you know, I fixed the problem. It's very natural to be skeptical. I would say that that's totally normal, I think. And that's also what you saw on the Cypherpunk mailing list for the most part. So yeah, the initial responses were definitely either indifferent.  </p>
<p>00:47:18:01 - 00:47:44:23<br>Aaron<br>And I should mention, by the way, at this point, the Cypherpunk mailing list had, for all practical reasons, been dissolved and now the sort of more serious cryptography mailing list have taken over. Like a lot of the same people started to discuss their ideas and strategies there. So it was very similar, but it was, it was a bit more moderated to limit the amount of flame wars and spam and that sort of stuff.  </p>
<p>00:47:44:25 - 00:48:09:00<br>Aaron<br>But yeah, for the most part I would say was indifference. And then those that did pay attention to the email either didn't believe in it or just didn't understand it. I caught some of these emails in my book, or at least some of the subparts of It's like I forgot who it actually was. I forgot the name of the person that sent this email.  </p>
<p>00:48:09:00 - 00:48:39:27<br>Aaron<br>But someone, funnily enough, suggests that Bitcoin seems like a pretty good idea, but it should have a difficulty adjustment algorithm, which it did. So clearly you didn't understand the proposal very well, which I should also say also very understandable. You know, we live in the 2020 for now, and now if you get into Bitcoin and you type it into YouTube, there's like a million colorful explainer videos and everyone wrote an article or a book like me about how Bitcoin works.  </p>
<p>00:48:39:27 - 00:49:17:13<br>Aaron<br>And but if, if it's 2028 and you've never heard of this and there's just this white paper from this one guy you don't know and you're sort of just reading through it. Yeah, obviously most people wouldn't understand it perfectly the first time around. So I'm not like judging these people just noticeable that they didn't quite get it. But yeah, again, the noticeable exception is of course how Vinny So he'll Vinnie still still at it just like on the Cypherpunk mailing list often sort of defers to take an interest, try to understand it, ask questions, try to explain it to other people.  </p>
<p>00:49:17:21 - 00:49:34:22<br>Aaron<br>And you still see this in 2008 when Bitcoin is first introduced by Satoshi that Hal is still this guy. That sort of adjusts what's in research. And just like that's not the English word. What's the English word mati for?  </p>
<p>00:49:34:22 - 00:49:36:16<br>Marty<br>Or there's the Aztec.  </p>
<p>00:49:36:18 - 00:49:38:11<br>Aaron<br>Is that just an English word.  </p>
<p>00:49:38:13 - 00:49:45:01<br>Marty<br>Enthusiastic? I don't know. I don't know. The etymology definitely is an English word.  </p>
<p>00:49:45:03 - 00:50:23:15<br>Aaron<br>Okay, I think we're good then. Yeah, but so how? Vinnie is definitely still one of these guys. Pretty much the only one who still And to Shostak about this new idea and sort of and he starts to help Satoshi as well for the monster follow with some bug fixes that kind of stuff yeah but but but pretty quickly like if you read it's back now like within like a couple of maybe like a couple dozen emails, maybe not even a couple dozen.  </p>
<p>00:50:23:17 - 00:50:51:07<br>Aaron<br>The the discussion about Bitcoin is sort of cut short by the moderator of the cryptography mailing list, Perry Metzger. It in this way of, you know, let's see code first pick up before we continue discussing this which Rector retrospectively it's kind of funny. It's like you know me I'm like a you know, I'm digging through this archives, kind of like as a historian doing my research.  </p>
<p>00:50:51:07 - 00:51:07:07<br>Aaron<br>And then this super revolutionary idea was invented. And then you've got this guy cutting down the discussion like, no, want to read what is what everyone want had to say about it? And this is like a goldmine and now it's over. So, yeah.  </p>
<p>00:51:07:09 - 00:51:15:01<br>Marty<br>Was that even correct? Because Satoshi say that he wrote the code before he wrote the paper because he wanted to make sure it worked.  </p>
<p>00:51:15:03 - 00:51:33:11<br>Aaron<br>He started writing the code before the paper. Yeah, that's right. But he published the paper before the code. So there were still a couple of months between paper and code, of course. But yeah, he said he'd been working on it for like two years before publishing the white paper. That's right. That's true.  </p>
<p>00:51:33:13 - 00:51:45:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So obviously, January 3rd, 2009, when the protocol, or at least on the Genesis block, was behind January 1st.  </p>
<p>00:51:45:18 - 00:51:53:21<br>Aaron<br>They referred us to Genesis block and then January 8th it was actually announced, shared on the on the cryptography mailing list. Mm hmm.  </p>
<p>00:51:53:23 - 00:51:57:25<br>Marty<br>And at that point, it was still just the genesis block or, you know, other blocks have been mined.  </p>
<p>00:51:57:26 - 00:52:34:19<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, yeah. Yes, yeah, yeah, yeah. It was just the genesis block embedded in the code. Of course, there had been no or at least, you know, we can't be completely 100% sure in retrospect, but at least according to the timestamps in the blocks, these were all found after the code was released on the mailing list. Now, you know, if you want to get conspiratorial or whatever, it's of course, possible that Satoshi would have sort of mined these before releasing the codes and embedding fake timestamps in the blocks.  </p>
<p>00:52:34:19 - 00:52:43:24<br>Aaron<br>But there's no indication that he actually did that. I don't think he did that. But we can't be 100% sure based on blockchain alone.  </p>
<p>00:52:43:26 - 00:52:45:21<br>Marty<br>Well.  </p>
<p>00:52:45:24 - 00:52:52:27<br>Aaron<br>We can't be 100% sure, of course, that the Genesis block was not mined before January 1st because it had this headline in the Genesis.  </p>
<p>00:52:52:27 - 00:53:16:00<br>Marty<br>BLOCK Yeah. And for anybody out there listening the beauty of the Genesis block, not only with the headline in the Coinbase transaction, but it can't be spent. So that was sort of an interesting decision that Satoshi made, like, Hey, I'm going to mine this first block just to get the start up, but I'm going be able to spend any of the Bitcoin that's officially mined.  </p>
<p>00:53:16:03 - 00:53:26:23<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, very cool touch. I think like even Satoshi himself had to earn his coins just like everyone else. That's true.  </p>
<p>00:53:26:25 - 00:53:48:12<br>Marty<br>And so what do you think, having done all this deep dives into the history of the economic theory and the Cypherpunk movement that led to Bitcoin, what was the emergence of Satoshi in the Bitcoin projects like? What impact did that have on the Cypherpunk movement overall, particularly over the last 15 years? Like, would you say the movement's stronger than ever?  </p>
<p>00:53:48:13 - 00:53:56:18<br>Marty<br>Has it gone astray at all? Was Toshi a figure that breathed life back into it?  </p>
<p>00:53:56:21 - 00:54:35:04<br>Aaron<br>I mean, I think the ideas and the ideals of the cypherpunk live on, but the movement itself is not really in so far. It's still a movement. It's definitely not what it used to be like. It used to be, as I mentioned, both the sort of in-person thing in California, where at the beginning maybe like 50 people showed up and then it became this early Internet phenomenon with the mailing list, which, as I mentioned at its peak had like 2000 people on there, although most of these people were just reading.  </p>
<p>00:54:35:06 - 00:55:13:11<br>Aaron<br>And yeah, I mean, today there's still people that call themselves cipher punks, obviously. And some of the technologies live on Bitcoin being an obvious one, but you could also count, you know, something like Tor or even something like Signal. I think that's perfectly fair to consider. Cypherpunk Technologies. WikiLeaks, of course, was also a very cypherpunk thing. Assange himself was on the Cypherpunk mailing list, so these ideas live on, but you have to really consider it's still a cypherpunk movement, not in the way it was anyway.  </p>
<p>00:55:13:14 - 00:55:47:00<br>Aaron<br>There's no central mailing lists like that anymore. They're still the cryptography mailing lists, which is still going on. So that's still living on. But I think, you know, someone like Tim May was such a sort of central figure and his ideas and his contributions that that really sort of attracted a lot of attention. And it sets the tone to a large extent for the Cypherpunk community, I would say.  </p>
<p>00:55:47:03 - 00:55:57:25<br>Aaron<br>And so with him gone and with the mailing list gone and I think it's a bit of a stretch to say that there's still a cypherpunk community, but the idea is live on.  </p>
<p>00:55:57:28 - 00:56:18:21<br>Marty<br>Yeah, maybe these are communities movements, if you will, that need to be somewhat ephemeral. People take their ideas or take them somewhere else. But another community, maybe that's like the the whack a mole that's necessary to actually get these technologies into the hands of the mainstream users.  </p>
<p>00:56:18:23 - 00:56:47:08<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, that's a good point. I mean, even the mailing list, like if if the philosophy of the cypherpunk is sort of this decentralized movement that has no structure and no no one, you know, dictating where it goes, then it's kind of natural, of course, that it just goes wherever and the mailing list, for example, itself was hosted for a long time by John Gilmore.  </p>
<p>00:56:47:11 - 00:57:22:12<br>Aaron<br>He at some point didn't want to do it. So then kind of the big migration happened. It migrated to Usenet for a while and then there were different servers sort of hosting that. And as I mentioned, the cryptography mailing list took it over. But yeah, I would I think that's probably a pretty good assessment that almost by its very nature of being this decentralized, leaderless structure of this thing, it just kind of spreads to wherever it goes, wherever and it becomes hard to sort of pin down in any central place or point.  </p>
<p>00:57:22:15 - 00:57:48:12<br>Marty<br>Yeah, and one thing going through this history, I can't help but think of how important timing is in the timing of when Satoshi released the white paper that eventually launched the protocol was so beautifully perfect in the midst of the great financial crisis. Obviously with the message in the Genesis block, he was certainly making somewhat of a political statement when he launched the protocol.  </p>
<p>00:57:48:14 - 00:58:04:09<br>Marty<br>And I think it's clear to me at least it was an idea digital cache more broadly whose time had come and Satoshi, luckily for us, figured out the perfect ingredients to get something together that that actually works.  </p>
<p>00:58:04:11 - 00:58:49:18<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, that's that's still an incredible part of the story, right. How perfect the timing was. And also, again, like if you imagine let's, you know, imagine that Bitcoin does become this big success. You know, hyper Bitcoin inflation happens like future historians must be so incredibly astonished by the timing of it all. And just a the the sort of bottom up nature of it's like there's this big financial crisis going on and the solution that somehow found on this niche mailing list with this paper by this anonymous guy, it's it's it's kind of mind blowing if.  </p>
<p>00:58:49:18 - 00:58:54:10<br>Marty<br>You had something as biblical and think about it and you're exactly right.  </p>
<p>00:58:54:11 - 00:58:56:29<br>Aaron<br>Yeah. Yeah. It's really incredible.  </p>
<p>00:58:57:01 - 00:59:20:13<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And then speaking to timing to other I like charm. Great idea with mints. Like, maybe he just needed to wait until bitcoin was launched. And you can build more. You can build mints. The correct way, leveraging something like the Fadiman protocol. There was a talk that Hal Finney gave back in the nineties about, uh, zero knowledge proofs and how they could be implemented.  </p>
<p>00:59:20:13 - 00:59:42:04<br>Marty<br>And now people are figuring out ways to leverage the zeek piece to help with initial block download and bitcoin like these ideas that were brought into existence decades ago. Maybe the timing wasn't right, like it just took bitcoin to be released and then you could implement the correct way, which is also fascinating to think about.  </p>
<p>00:59:42:06 - 01:00:01:19<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, it's really cool to see some of these technologies, ICOs being the most obvious example, I would say. Yeah, really cool to see that being rediscovered. Like when I started my research that wasn't the case, that also this really sort of happens during that I was writing about this stuff. I'm not saying it has anything to do with me.  </p>
<p>01:00:01:26 - 01:00:22:22<br>Aaron<br>That's not the claim at all. I'm just saying it's interesting to see how like as I was sort of discovering these things, it's also been rediscovered in a Bitcoin context and people now actually start to bill built these technologies on Bitcoin, which seems like, yeah, a very good match to me. Anyways, David Shoham is not really a Bitcoin or is.  </p>
<p>01:00:22:25 - 01:00:25:02<br>Marty<br>He started his own privacy coin then he.  </p>
<p>01:00:25:05 - 01:00:46:29<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, he was involved with like Elixir for a little while. I have no idea what happened with that, although I think Elixir was supposed to also support bitcoin like it was supposed to also be a mixer for bitcoin. But I'm, I'm going off my suboptimal memory at this point and I don't know for sure what the idea was there.  </p>
<p>01:00:47:02 - 01:00:49:07<br>Aaron<br>I don't think it went anywhere, right?  </p>
<p>01:00:49:09 - 01:01:18:04<br>Marty<br>I don't think so. But it is interesting, right? Because I imagine Trump did that because he's looking at Bitcoin in the tradeoffs. It's a totally made particularly as they pertain to privacy, not what he probably would have wanted as a privacy idealist. Um, and it's interesting now that Jimmy events are being launched on top of bitcoin, which give Bitcoin users their privacy within these 30 minutes, or just his signal mints like cashew.  </p>
<p>01:01:18:06 - 01:01:19:29<br>Aaron<br>Um, yeah, well, he's.  </p>
<p>01:01:19:29 - 01:01:41:08<br>Marty<br>Kicking himself in the butt like, oh, I mean, I, this patient thought creatively about this. Like, you can't have it. It's just going to take time. And in my mind, like, I think the tradeoffs that were made as a pretense of privacy, while they're hard to stomach for a lot, I do think they're worthwhile at the protocol level and you can just push that up to other layers.  </p>
<p>01:01:41:11 - 01:02:09:10<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, it also it's interesting, I mentioned Bitcoin, for example, this idea and how that was pretty complex. I mean, it's not it's kind of complex, but the reason it's complex for the reason I say that is because it actually also had it different layers essentially. So it also had like sort of this base layer idea which can be, you know, that was textual bit gold, so to say.  </p>
<p>01:02:09:10 - 01:02:55:10<br>Aaron<br>There was sort of this digital scarcity, this proof of work type of currency. But then he imagines a sort of free banking layer on top of it, which would be more suited to make the actual payments and to make the actual transactions on. So there's also, you know, there's very similar to the direction that even today sort of the prominence Bitcoin developers or, you know, Bitcoin thinkers are kind of thinking about scaling like this seems like a plausible way that Bitcoin might actually scales, you know, through layers and through some sort of whether it's sediment or whether it's different types of, you know, whether you want to call them banks or what different trust models  </p>
<p>01:02:55:10 - 01:03:21:14<br>Aaron<br>and how these are then sort of conducted over a lightning network like it really resembles something that an example was speculating Bitcoins should be designed as. So you see these echoes and you see these lessons from the past sort of being either rediscovered to reinvent it. And it's definitely the lineage is clearly there with the whole digital cash project and Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:03:21:17 - 01:03:47:13<br>Marty<br>Yeah, speaking of the free banking conversation and Bitcoin and how much that big old project influence how Finney it's funny, in the early days in December 2010 when he took to the Bitcoin Talk Talk forum to basically lay out the case like, Hey, we're going to scale in a free banking model where where Bitcoin will be a reserve asset, these private banks and they'll issue, he said, their own currencies.  </p>
<p>01:03:47:13 - 01:03:59:10<br>Marty<br>I don't think he could have foresaw something like the settlement protocol or lightning materializing at that time, but you could see he was directionally right. If you believe this is the optimal scaling path.  </p>
<p>01:03:59:13 - 01:04:28:22<br>Aaron<br>Well, you could argue that Fetterman in particular does sort of issue its own currency, right? They're tokens that are backed by Bitcoin. So in that sense, it's actually very similar. Now, I don't think Betterment is using fractional reserve or at least that's not the plan, right? While this sort of Seldon type of idea to use fractional reserve explicitly, those actually in earlier and earlier drafts of my book explored this whole part of free banking and George Sergeant's ideas.  </p>
<p>01:04:28:23 - 01:05:00:14<br>Aaron<br>But I ended up not using most of that because it was kind of speculating about the future of Bitcoin. While I really wanted my book to be grounded in the history and just sort of, you know, what we know rather than what might be in the future. But George Seldon still makes a couple of appearances for the book here and there, like he was on the same mailing list as example and White Eye and a couple of these people said it was the Cypherpunk mailing list.  </p>
<p>01:05:00:17 - 01:05:27:24<br>Aaron<br>And then there was also the Lipsyte mailing list, which was a more focused mailing list on digital cash. And that also had some of these free banking types on there. And they were sort of sharing their their ideas with, you know, some of the cipher banks on there. So these include George Selden and Lawrence White. So so that makes a couple of appearances in my book, like Hayek's idea of free banking, as I mentioned earlier, is sort of a big frat from my book.  </p>
<p>01:05:27:24 - 01:05:37:17<br>Aaron<br>And there you can see the limits to how this idea started to inspire some of the cypherpunk as well, specifically through this all their mailing list. For example.  </p>
<p>01:05:37:19 - 01:06:07:21<br>Marty<br>Yeah, that's fast is again, going back to the beauty of like the economic side of things, like the economic theorists really recognizing that the cryptographers were on to something that if they were going to if they were going to put their economic theory into practice, they're going to leverage something that the cipher punks were building and sort of combining their their minds to to really push this forward.  </p>
<p>01:06:07:24 - 01:06:12:12<br>Marty<br>It's just incredibly fascinating. All right. Still.  </p>
<p>01:06:12:14 - 01:06:42:02<br>Aaron<br>Yes. And this idea also emerged within the ASTROBEE in the community. So this was this sort of futuristic community that had all of these ideas about life extension, cloning, space colonization, like all kinds of wild ideas. But there were serious about it. And the way they believed it could be achieved was by eliminating the role of government in society.  </p>
<p>01:06:42:02 - 01:07:31:20<br>Aaron<br>Essentially, they saw government as sort of a leech on economic activity, and they believed if you just let the government sorry, if you let the people experiment, and if you let the free market reign, we can achieve all of these interesting technologies that would reshape society and even transform humanity itself. And a number of the Cypherpunk and Bitcoin sort of followers or, you know, pre prehistory godfathers like Salvini, they were also on this X Shopian list and it was how many that introduced digital cash to this list as a way to sort of get governments out of your life, specifically sort of get government out of your finances like the privacy angle and then some  </p>
<p>01:07:31:20 - 01:08:16:24<br>Aaron<br>of the extra openness like the founder was called Max Moore. He's still around, by the way. He he he really saw this potential, which you just mentioned, of leveraging this electronic cash technology not just for privacy, but also for monetary reform to sort of realize Hayek's ideas about, money, that that's that's really something he started pushing for any ideas he started to spread, including to some of these other cypherpunk that were that were there, which as I mentioned, included not just health any, but widening the tsavo to me like a bunch of these guys were there and getting these ideas and sharing these ideas.  </p>
<p>01:08:16:27 - 01:08:45:07<br>Marty<br>It's interesting now that you mention that go to that story, I think we're at the beginning of a similar story with this, um, uh, effective acceleration movement and Bitcoin. I think there's a lot of people in Bitcoin particularly looking at what's going on in the HCC movement, which is predominantly being driven by people working on artificial intelligence. I mean like, hey, I think we should, we should talk.  </p>
<p>01:08:45:07 - 01:09:08:07<br>Marty<br>I think there's some way Bitcoin can play into this. And I think our philosophical ideas of where society should be going are pretty aligned. And you could see the sort of intermingling of the Bitcoin culture and this ekyc culture beginning to collide and really work with each other to to take us to the next step forward.  </p>
<p>01:09:08:09 - 01:09:11:26<br>Aaron<br>So I don't know what is this easy. Can you explain?  </p>
<p>01:09:11:29 - 01:09:35:26<br>Marty<br>Uh, so it's a play on effective altruism, which Sam Bankman-fried was a big advocate of. It's effective Accelerationism, which is there's two competing forces in the world right now, those who want to accelerate and those who want to decelerate these. So acceleration is aligning more with the was a utopian mailing list that you described.  </p>
<p>01:09:36:02 - 01:09:41:02<br>Aaron<br>It's shopian. Yeah, it was a community. They had a magazine and a mailing list as well. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:09:41:04 - 01:10:07:01<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So they're probably the extra peons of the modern day really saying, Hey government, get out of the way. We shouldn't create regulatory moats around artificial intelligence. You should let people experiment with this and create their own models, and they're ardently juxtaposing themselves versus those who would like to see regulatory boats and the deceleration of the proliferation of these technologies.  </p>
<p>01:10:07:04 - 01:10:12:21<br>Aaron<br>Right. Interesting. Yeah, that sounds pretty similar. That sounds like shopian. They're basically shopian. It sounds like.  </p>
<p>01:10:12:23 - 01:10:36:03<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And so, like, it does seem like particularly when you think of things like L for a too and all the lessons that the Bitcoin minus mining industry has learned with the energy sector, I think A.I. is very controversial these days, but I use it myself. It is certainly useful in many contexts. It can be harmful too, but all technologies can be used for good or bad.  </p>
<p>01:10:36:05 - 01:10:38:10<br>Marty<br>You can make the argument at the end of the day.  </p>
<p>01:10:38:13 - 01:10:42:00<br>Aaron<br>What do you use it for? Like text, text.  </p>
<p>01:10:42:00 - 01:10:49:15<br>Marty<br>Image generation that we're using it to help curate content on the site and then create thumbnails?  </p>
<p>01:10:49:17 - 01:10:50:14<br>Aaron<br>Right, Right.  </p>
<p>01:10:50:16 - 01:11:32:13<br>Marty<br>Like this will be put through a transcription Artificial intelligence while the transcript of this episode within minutes after we plug it in and then other things, but like the conversions of Bitcoin and I, I think it's symbiotic. I think there's ways you can leverage artificial intelligence to have something like more efficient channel management on the Lightning Network, more efficient fee estimation softwares than I think Bitcoin, particularly over the Lightning Network, can make the air products more efficient, where if you want to get rid of your chargeback, risk you're spending a lot of money on the compute.  </p>
<p>01:11:32:13 - 01:12:03:24<br>Marty<br>Just put a lightning network enabled pay wall for for compute in front of it. And then again go back to mining. The mining industry has learned a lot about the energy sector and air is obviously going to be energy intensive too. And due to the nature of the need for 100% uptime of these GPU data centers in the artificial intelligence arena, I do think there's going to be co-location of Bitcoin eh6 that can participate in demand response and these GPU farms that are looking for low cost energy.  </p>
<p>01:12:03:24 - 01:12:27:14<br>Marty<br>And the only way to get that low cost energy is to participate in demand response and you need the Bitcoin miners for that. So I think a bunch of synergies and right now the to the X trophy and sphere and the Cypherpunk digital cash Bitcoin sphere are like a little bit disconnected, but you can see them sort of beginning to recognize, okay, maybe you ought to help each other out here.  </p>
<p>01:12:27:17 - 01:12:58:01<br>Aaron<br>Yeah. I mean, they're very they, they share a history not just in the extra open domain I mentioned, but you could argue even the very early history, like I mentioned, I start my book with sort of the emergence of the hacker culture. And that actually was at the lab of of MIT. So just when computers, you know, were first around, you got the the first experimentations and the first idea of creating it.  </p>
<p>01:12:58:03 - 01:13:25:00<br>Aaron<br>I was, you know, at the very beginning was like creating chess, computers and that kind of stuff. But it happened at the same place where, you know, like our culture emerged from there. Public key cryptography was invented. So, so it has a common ancestor and it's not a it's not surprising to see that they would find each other again now or in the future.  </p>
<p>01:13:25:02 - 01:13:46:07<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it's like they converge, diverge, reemerge, right. It's a beautiful thing and it's important to know the history, I guess is a good point. Circle pitch the book. Like why do you think people should understand the context of everything that came before Bitcoin?  </p>
<p>01:13:46:09 - 01:14:08:10<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, well, I mean, I am a historian technically, and the reason for that is that just in general, I believe if you want to understand why things are the way they are, if you want to understand why society is the way it is, why we have the institutions, we have it, it helps or to understand where it all came from.  </p>
<p>01:14:08:13 - 01:14:37:08<br>Aaron<br>And I think the same is true for Bitcoin. If you want to understand why Bitcoin is designed the way it is, why it was invented, it really helps. Or maybe it's even necessary to sort of understand where it came from. I mentioned that, you know, Bitcoin sort of consists of all these building blocks that kind of pre-dates Bitcoin and also the economic ideas that that are sort of embedded in Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:14:37:08 - 01:15:02:19<br>Aaron<br>Like it all predates Bitcoin and it was all brought together at some point. And I do think yeah I sort of had two goals with my book. You could say there's sort of two layers to it. One layer is if you already know a lot about Bitcoin, then it's hopefully, you know, interesting to learn where it all came from.  </p>
<p>01:15:02:22 - 01:15:20:29<br>Aaron<br>But also if you don't know a lot about Bitcoin, I hope that it's a good way to actually understand Bitcoin and the sort of this sort of step by step way where one step at a time, you know, public key cryptography is explain that work and then why these guys wanted to create this and where the economic ideas come from.  </p>
<p>01:15:20:29 - 01:15:28:03<br>Aaron<br>So it's a good way to understand Bitcoin itself. Well, I hope that that's the goal anyways. One of the goals.  </p>
<p>01:15:28:06 - 01:16:00:25<br>Marty<br>Now, well, we're going to learn from anybody in the space. I can speak from experience, having learned a ton throughout my time in Bitcoin from Aaron, you should go pick up the book because I completely agree to know where we are and where we may be. You have to understand where we came from and diving into the history of the Cypherpunk movement and all the iterations on digital cash that led to Bitcoin is extremely important, particularly if you're one of those individuals is new to Bitcoin out there, is convinced that it's the MySpace, that it's the first ever digital currency.  </p>
<p>01:16:00:25 - 01:16:06:06<br>Marty<br>It's wrong on its face. There was a lot of pre-history that led to.  </p>
<p>01:16:06:06 - 01:16:24:17<br>Aaron<br>Bitcoin, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. The Bitcoin is the first one that actually works. It's not the first one. It's the first one that got it right. You could say, Yeah. And I do think if you that becomes maybe more clear, if you read my book, I'm done selling my book, but.  </p>
<p>01:16:24:19 - 01:16:26:27<br>Marty<br>You're not done yet. Where can we find the book? That's the next.  </p>
<p>01:16:26:27 - 01:16:55:03<br>Aaron<br>Question. Oh, well, me first finish this point like, yeah, there's, that is a very common, you know, critique of Bitcoin that it's just a first of its kind and something better will come along and I do think that you know, if you read this prehistory then it's clear that no Bitcoin actually wasn't the first. There were other digital currency projects before it, including some that actually existed that some people used, you know, like MySpace actually existed and some people use it.  </p>
<p>01:16:55:06 - 01:17:12:15<br>Aaron<br>But Bitcoin is the first one that's actually succeeding that. That's that's one of the insights you could take away. Where can people find it? Well, it's on Amazon, It's on the Bitcoin magazine store. You can also go to Genesis book dot com and you'll find what you need there.  </p>
<p>01:17:12:15 - 01:17:19:22<br>Marty<br>Hopefully not only is it on Amazon, it's a bestseller on Amazon. I checked this.  </p>
<p>01:17:19:22 - 01:17:40:27<br>Aaron<br>Morning, it was for a brief moment in the Netherlands for like a day in the Netherlands. It was the number one bestselling book like on Amazon in the country that was a that was pretty ace. I didn't expect that like out of all books, not just subcategory, but just the bestselling book in the Netherlands, just for a day.  </p>
<p>01:17:40:27 - 01:17:43:03<br>Aaron<br>But still, that was pretty cool.  </p>
<p>01:17:43:06 - 01:17:47:10<br>Marty<br>We've got it. I'm going to take the screenshot, put the Logan number one new release.  </p>
<p>01:17:47:12 - 01:17:48:02<br>Aaron<br>Hmm. Hmm.  </p>
<p>01:17:48:04 - 01:17:54:23<br>Marty<br>According to my Amazon account here in the U.S., so it's still going to open just on the screen so people know what the.  </p>
<p>01:17:54:26 - 01:18:00:07<br>Aaron<br>That's probably in some cases, it must be in some category, right?  </p>
<p>01:18:00:10 - 01:18:05:21<br>Marty<br>Development and growth economics. That's a good that's a good.  </p>
<p>01:18:05:23 - 01:18:06:25<br>Aaron<br>I'll take it.  </p>
<p>01:18:06:28 - 01:18:10:22<br>Marty<br>That's a good one to be in.  </p>
<p>01:18:10:25 - 01:18:12:05<br>Aaron<br>The, uh.  </p>
<p>01:18:12:08 - 01:18:25:13<br>Marty<br>While this is uploading. Anything else I wouldn't touch on You think people should be aware of? Are you optimistic about where Bitcoin is and where it's going right now?  </p>
<p>01:18:25:16 - 01:18:47:22<br>Aaron<br>Yes. I mean, I think it's going pretty well. I would say I've been kind of zoned out of to sort of daily. Yeah. You know, during the Blocksize war, I was very involved with everything that was going every week. I was tuned in and I was in every chat group everywhere and sort of keeping a pulse on everything I could.  </p>
<p>01:18:47:22 - 01:19:06:22<br>Aaron<br>And it was during the writing of my book, I've sort of, you know, zoomed out a bit. So I'm not I'm not very involved in like the JPAC war or whatever the kids are fighting over these days. But in general, it seems to be doing pretty well to me. I Don't see anything wrong with you. What do you think?  </p>
<p>01:19:06:24 - 01:19:18:00<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I've been I mean, I've been keeping my pulse on the space for the the JPEG wars, as you, as you call them. I've been. Yeah. It seems like noise to me. It'll come and go.  </p>
<p>01:19:18:00 - 01:19:35:22<br>Aaron<br>I mean to me, like, isn't this what the Blocksize wars were kind of like. We have a blocksize limit so blocks can't be too big. And now if you want to stuff them with nonsense into, you got to pay for it. That's sort of the point of the block size limits for a large extent, so I'm not too worried about.  </p>
<p>01:19:35:22 - 01:19:53:09<br>Aaron<br>That's as far as I can tell. Bitcoin is still working, a block is still mined 10 minutes. There's now even ETFs. There's that the price is still pretty well I'm happy camper Marty.  </p>
<p>01:19:53:12 - 01:20:02:29<br>Marty<br>I am as well and I think maybe most importantly the outside world seems to be getting crazier and crazier. So that plays to our benefit as well.  </p>
<p>01:20:03:01 - 01:20:14:23<br>Aaron<br>Right? Bitcoin is still Bitcoin is sort of the central point of sanity in a in a in a crazy world it does feel like that sometimes to me. Anyways.  </p>
<p>01:20:14:25 - 01:20:24:22<br>Marty<br>That's the way I like to visualize bitcoin in my own mind. It's just this like beam of light in the center of a town that we can all access like anchor into and it's just always going to be beaming at the same.  </p>
<p>01:20:24:25 - 01:20:28:17<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, pretty much, Yes, exactly.  </p>
<p>01:20:28:19 - 01:20:32:06<br>Marty<br>Well, Aaron, I can't believe it took this long, but I'm happy.  </p>
<p>01:20:32:08 - 01:20:34:03<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, it was fun to finally be on.  </p>
<p>01:20:34:06 - 01:20:39:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah, we'll have to do it again if you're ever stateside. Let me now come to town.  </p>
<p>01:20:39:26 - 01:20:42:13<br>Aaron<br>Texas, with a person. Where are you, Austin?  </p>
<p>01:20:42:16 - 01:20:43:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:20:43:26 - 01:20:47:01<br>Aaron<br>I've never been to Austin, so I should. At some point, you've got.  </p>
<p>01:20:47:01 - 01:20:51:26<br>Marty<br>To count those people working on charm events right behind me. Literally. Nice. Behind this. Well.  </p>
<p>01:20:51:28 - 01:20:54:00<br>Aaron<br>Next time, I'm Darrell helping you.  </p>
<p>01:20:54:02 - 01:20:59:19<br>Marty<br>All right, you go enjoy your night. Thank you for thank you for doing this And keep crocheted.  </p>
<p>01:20:59:22 - 01:21:01:24<br>Aaron<br>Yes. Thanks for having me.  </p>
<p>01:21:01:26 - 01:21:03:08<br>Marty<br>Peace, love, freaks. Okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[Scrib]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/the-genesis-book-aaron-van-wirdum/">Read original post</a></p>
<h3><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h3>
<p>This episode of TFTC with Marty and guest Aaron van Wirdum delves into the prehistory of Bitcoin, discussing the genesis of the ideas, technologies, and economic theories that paved the way for the emergence of the first successful decentralized digital currency. The episode covers a range of topics from the significance of River and Crowdhealth as sponsors, to the rich history of the cypherpunk movement, the milestones in digital cash development, and the pivotal role played by various figures in shaping what ultimately became Bitcoin.</p>
<p>Aaron's new book, "The Genesis Book," is highlighted as an essential read for understanding the narrative and the people behind the inspirations that led to Bitcoin. The conversation takes a deep dive into the intricacies of the technology and economics of digital cash, tracing back to the hacker culture at MIT, the birth of public key cryptography, and the ideological underpinnings from figures like Friedrich Hayek. Aaron recounts the frustrations of early cypherpunks with centralized digital cash systems like David Chaum's eCash and how innovations like Adam Back's Hashcash contributed to the concept of digital scarcity, a key element in Bitcoin's design.</p>
<p>The discussion also touches on Bitcoin's unique value proposition that got the incentives right, ensuring its adoption and success, unlike its predecessors. It reflects on the initial skepticism towards Bitcoin within the cypherpunk community and how Hal Finney's enthusiasm and contributions were instrumental in the early days following Satoshi Nakamoto's announcement of Bitcoin on the cryptography mailing list.</p>
<h3><strong>Links</strong></h3>
<p>Aaron on <a href="https://twitter.com/AaronvanW?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>The <a href="http://thegenesisbook.com/?ref=tftc.io">Genesis Book</a></p>
<h3><strong>Best Quotes</strong></h3>
<ol>
<li>"Bitcoin is the first one that actually works. It's not the first one; it's the first one that got it right." – Aaron van Wirdum, emphasizing that while Bitcoin was not the first attempt at digital cash, it was the first to successfully address the challenges faced by earlier projects.</li>
<li>"If bitcoin succeeds, then I would really expect future historians to look back on these guys [the cypherpunks] like Americans in particular, sort of look back on the founding fathers." – Aaron van Wirdum, drawing a parallel between the influence of the cypherpunks on digital currency and the impact of the founding fathers on American history.</li>
<li>"I think bitcoin, let's say money, is an important tool for humanity, right? Arguably the most important tool." – Aaron van Wirdum, highlighting the significance of money as a tool for human society and the potential of Bitcoin as a breakthrough in this domain.</li>
</ol>
<h3>Sponsors</h3>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3>
<p>The podcast episode with Aaron van Wirdum provides a fascinating exploration of the roots of Bitcoin, shedding light on the collective efforts and revolutionary ideas that culminated in the creation of a decentralized digital currency. Aaron's insights and historical accounts offer a compelling narrative that is not only educational but also deeply inspiring, revealing the dedication and vision of the individuals who played a role in Bitcoin's inception.</p>
<p>The overarching message is clear: Bitcoin is not merely a technological marvel; it is the result of a philosophical and economic evolution that has been brewing for decades. The potential implications for future discussions include a deeper appreciation of the historical context of Bitcoin and an understanding that its success was not accidental but the outcome of getting the incentives right.</p>
<p>By engaging with this history, listeners and readers are invited to reflect on the importance of remembering and learning from the past to better appreciate the present and influence the future – a future that may very well be shaped by Bitcoin and the principles it stands for.</p>
<h3>Timestamps</h3>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>6:32 - Storytime with Marty<br>13:00 - Genesis book<br>16:15 - Where does Bitcoin’s history begin?<br>19:43 - Cypherpunk history<br>27:50 - Who are the OGs?<br>31:05 - Precursor projects and culture<br>35:53 - Hashcash, BitGold, B-Money<br>43:11 - Demand for privacy tech<br>52:18 - Whitepaper and genesis block<br>1:00:06 - Cypherpunks today<br>1:03:52 - Timing and Chaum<br>1:09:51 - Free banking, extropians, AI<br>1:20:01 - Pitching the book</p>
<h3>Transcript</h3>
<p>00:00:02:28 - 00:00:07:27<br>Marty<br>Aaron, It's a long time coming. Is your first time on taxi, which is embarrassing on my part.  </p>
<p>00:00:08:00 - 00:00:15:25<br>Aaron<br>It is. Yeah. We came close. One time in New York, I think, but I wasn't close enough to actually come on the show. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:00:15:27 - 00:00:16:15<br>Marty<br>Now, I think.  </p>
<p>00:00:16:15 - 00:00:27:04<br>Aaron<br>David was on. David Bailey was on. And I think you're DMS me, but I was like, not actually the physical building or something. I recall something. But yeah, this the first time.  </p>
<p>00:00:27:04 - 00:00:32:21<br>Marty<br>Around that was a consensus. 2019, I think maybe 2018.  </p>
<p>00:00:32:23 - 00:00:35:02<br>Aaron<br>One of these, Yeah. Yes.  </p>
<p>00:00:35:04 - 00:01:00:21<br>Marty<br>I think it was really it's for 2017 because they're still somewhat bull vibes. So I think it was 2018. But I'm happy we're doing this now. We're here to talk about your new book, The Genesis book, The Story of the People and projects inspired Bitcoin. But before we get to that, I wanted to walk you through a pivotal point of my Bitcoin story that you were involved in, which revolves around the Bitcoins.  </p>
<p>00:01:00:24 - 00:01:22:06<br>Marty<br>Moby Dick research that Laurent did into the spamming attack on the Bitcoin network went on 2015 2016. I don't know if you recall, but we put together a Slack channel and at one point it was me, you and him trying to dissect the chain data of the spam attack, and I had no idea what I was looking at.  </p>
<p>00:01:22:06 - 00:01:29:28<br>Marty<br>But you and Laurent were were conversing back and forth, and I was just observing from afar of you guys diving into this data.  </p>
<p>00:01:30:00 - 00:01:39:25<br>Aaron<br>I do remember this. I definitely remember the term. You mentioned the Moby Dick spammer. And I remember did I write an article about it in the end? Probably right?  </p>
<p>00:01:39:27 - 00:01:43:15<br>Marty<br>I think so. I think Laurent wrote a series on it as well.  </p>
<p>00:01:43:17 - 00:01:57:01<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, I don't remember the actual details, but I just remember that this happened. Yeah, but I couldn't tell you anything about it anymore. I just. The name rings a bell and I know I was sort of there for. It's. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:01:57:04 - 00:02:24:21<br>Marty<br>Yeah. From right, from what I recall leading up to the fork wars, obviously the fourth wars revolved around the fact that Bitcoin fees were high. When you to increase blocs. One faction thought in Laurent and basically identified that somebody was spamming the mempool with 564 set transactions and he was using. Alex taught me to visualize that we were in the Slack channel.  </p>
<p>00:02:24:24 - 00:02:34:09<br>Marty<br>And for me that was pivotal in my point, really like diving into chain data and better understanding like the nuances of suitcases and how they can affect the free market.  </p>
<p>00:02:34:11 - 00:02:57:09<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, yeah. I mean, there was a lot of shenanigans going on around that time, including these spam attacks, to sort of make the blocks look for, even though they weren't really at the time. I definitely remember all that kind of stuff going on, which ironically kind of proved the point of why you need a block size limit because otherwise just spam blocks to infinite sizes.  </p>
<p>00:02:57:09 - 00:03:04:04<br>Aaron<br>So yeah, yeah. At least with the block size limits, it's expensive to do it like.  </p>
<p>00:03:04:06 - 00:03:27:03<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And at this time I think it was 27 or 28 I thought was so cool and I was in the Slack channel with you. Yeah, I think I've been following you for almost a decade now in what you've been doing, writing about Bitcoin, everything you've done in Bitcoin magazine. And I was just like, Oh my God, I mean, this selection with an Aaron Venn weirdo and Laurent, like, digging to this chain there that I've no idea what what is what it's saying to me.  </p>
<p>00:03:27:05 - 00:03:28:18<br>Aaron<br>Mm hmm.  </p>
<p>00:03:28:21 - 00:03:36:02<br>Marty<br>Um, in a pivotal part of my Bitcoin's strategy is being in that Slack channel with you and observing.  </p>
<p>00:03:36:04 - 00:03:37:09<br>Aaron<br>Cool.  </p>
<p>00:03:37:11 - 00:03:38:13<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:03:38:15 - 00:03:49:09<br>Aaron<br>So, yeah, I. Like I said, you have a better memory of those events that I, if I remember, it happens. But that's, that's pretty much, um.  </p>
<p>00:03:49:11 - 00:04:13:18<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I mean, you've probably forgotten more than people have ever known about Bitcoin and most people on the planet, with all the research that you've done, all the writings that you've done, all the research that you've done, not only into Bitcoin itself, but with this book, the Genesis book, Digging into the History of the Precursors Technologies, an economic theory that led to Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:04:13:20 - 00:04:16:16<br>Marty<br>What what's it been like? I have a space.  </p>
<p>00:04:16:18 - 00:04:30:05<br>Aaron<br>I have forgotten more than most people know about Bitcoin. That's which is that I mean, that's probably true because most people don't know a lot about Bitcoin. Plus I have a bad memory, so it has to be true, but you just know it.  </p>
<p>00:04:30:08 - 00:04:40:15<br>Marty<br>Uh, so what's it been like covering the space for you in general? Yeah. What's it been like? Why do you cover it?  </p>
<p>00:04:40:17 - 00:05:17:07<br>Aaron<br>Like, why did I even start covering this? Yeah, I mean, I think Bitcoin, let's say money is an important tool for humanity. You're right. Arguably the most important tool. So I. I actually studied, like, political history. It's there's a longer name to it, but I was also sort of I was always interested in sort of how do people organize so how do society organize, you know, what political systems have been tried, economic theories like it was sort of always something I found interesting.  </p>
<p>00:05:17:10 - 00:05:45:22<br>Aaron<br>And even before Bitcoin, I had gotten interested in both finance, like the whole financial crisis had been happening, of course. So that sort of attracted my attention. But then also the free and open source software movement, which had its own kind of ideals, the old way of cooperating, which I also describe in my book for a part and with Bitcoin, these two really came together.  </p>
<p>00:05:45:22 - 00:06:21:00<br>Aaron<br>It's an open source forum of money, and that just blew my mind. Like while everyone was talking about either forming banks or especially in the United States, maybe ending the feds and Bitcoin just sort of did it. And for me that feels like a very interesting and potentially incredibly important breakthrough that I at first I wanted to just write a couple of articles or started with one, but then, you know, the more I learned, the more I realized that this is just got to be my career.  </p>
<p>00:06:21:00 - 00:06:30:02<br>Aaron<br>Now, I started that blog at first and then a new site and started freelancing for Bitcoin Publications. And I'm still here now. I wrote a book. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:06:30:04 - 00:06:53:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Well, it's a good lay up too, to talk about the book. I think that's one of the misconceptions around Bitcoin from people who aren't really involved and are looking at it from the outside in. They see it as this technology that came out of nowhere and many have equated it to the MySpace of the cryptocurrency space. But what you're diving into here in the Genesis book is that's not true.  </p>
<p>00:06:53:29 - 00:07:25:15<br>Marty<br>Bitcoin is really the culmination of almost a century of advances and in political theory, economic theory and then computer science as well. Many, many tried and failed to release digital currencies over the last three decades. And it wasn't until Satoshi gifted the world with the way paper and the protocol that we actually found a a digital currency that that seems to be working.  </p>
<p>00:07:25:17 - 00:07:49:22<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, for me personally, I knew about some of these earlier projects in the same way. I think many Bitcoiners especially these days will sort of note that there were these other projects, although when I started writing, I think that was still kind of a mystery for many people. There was still sort of this idea that Bitcoin really came out of nothing and like you just explained, it really didn't.  </p>
<p>00:07:49:24 - 00:08:07:03<br>Aaron<br>But even if, you know, it didn't like for me personally, a couple of years ago, I knew there was this thing called Bit Gold that Nick Szabo worked on and there was this hash cache and B money, which is mentioned in the white paper. But for me that was sort of it. There were like footnotes in the white paper.  </p>
<p>00:08:07:03 - 00:08:40:07<br>Aaron<br>There were there was this one page in a Bitcoin book that mentions decipher Pong two that mentions that there was this thing going on, these people before Bitcoin that were interested in this stuff, but that, that was sort of it. And for me at that point, I'd been writing about Bitcoin for multiple years. I've been exploring it through my articles myself, understanding how it all works, and also especially during the Blocksize wars, which you mentioned, kind of being in the middle of this debate about the future of Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:08:40:09 - 00:09:02:18<br>Aaron<br>So I was really covering it intensely for years and at some point I felt like I want to know more about what is actually came from. I want to know more about what is this actual prehistory that that's sort of alluded to in this one page in the chapter, one of this other Bitcoin book. Like what? What are they actually talking about?  </p>
<p>00:09:02:18 - 00:09:27:28<br>Aaron<br>What are what is the story here? What did drive these people? So that's what I set out to do. For the past couple of years. I've been working on this book for a couple of years. In the meantime, I also published several articles, sort of standalone articles on the specific digital cash projects that came before Bitcoin. These were called the Genesis Files, and now we had the Genesis book really kind of tries to wrap it all in.  </p>
<p>00:09:27:28 - 00:09:42:12<br>Aaron<br>One big story also includes a lot more of the economic foundations of Bitcoin and how that all sort of interplays and ultimately led to Bitcoin. That's, that's the goal anyway. So that's what I set out to do.  </p>
<p>00:09:42:15 - 00:09:54:28<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So how far back does this go? Where do you draw the line of like, all right, here's the first step toward bitcoin. What part of history?  </p>
<p>00:09:55:00 - 00:10:05:22<br>Aaron<br>Yeah. So it starts with the Arabs inventing zero. No, that's, that's actually that's actually a Dilbert comic joke. You know this?  </p>
<p>00:10:05:24 - 00:10:06:25<br>Marty<br>No.  </p>
<p>00:10:06:27 - 00:10:31:27<br>Aaron<br>It's his Dilbert comic where someone asks, Okay, explain blockchain to me. And then that's where he starts with the invention of zero. Explain it to me, but don't give me the I don't remember the exact joke. Anyways, so actually, I start my book. So there's two starting points in my book. Essentially, it starts with two legs, if you will.  </p>
<p>00:10:31:29 - 00:10:58:22<br>Aaron<br>Two There's two storylines in the book. One of them is really the economic part. So the book opens with Hayek, while not counting the introduction to the book opens with Hayek, and then in the first part of the book, I explore Hayek's thinking about money. And I choose high specifically because I think in different parts of his life it's ideas that are very relevant to Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:10:58:24 - 00:11:29:16<br>Aaron<br>Like early in his career, he was sort of musing about this neutral money, which would be a currency with a limited supply that could be used internationally, borderless, and so very much resembles Bitcoin later in his career, he proposes that money should be left to the free markets, and then even later in his career, he sees the only way to enable that is to create something that governments can stop.  </p>
<p>00:11:29:16 - 00:12:01:16<br>Aaron<br>There's this famous Hayek quote that many Bitcoiners will have heard. So Hayek sort of has this recurring role in my book, and that's one side of the story. And then the other side of the story starts with the emergence of the hacker culture. So starts with at MIT, essentially where, you know, the first computers are brought on campus and hacker culture emerges, which is really based on this idea of sharing that code and free software and open source software comes from that.  </p>
<p>00:12:01:18 - 00:12:24:28<br>Aaron<br>And this storyline proceeds with the invention of public key cryptography, and it all sort of starts to merge with the Cypherpunk. So in the cypherpunk tried to create digital cash. Some of them, you know, I already briefly mentioned like Nick Szabo's Bitcoin and there was health benefits. ARPA y would be money, which is referenced in the white paper.  </p>
<p>00:12:25:00 - 00:12:49:02<br>Aaron<br>So this at this point the cyber punks want to create digital cash and they're really inspired, I would say, by this to different kind of ideological movements that sort of become one at that point. Also in the book, at that points in the book, it sort of becomes a more singular storyline with these different projects sort of following each other up.  </p>
<p>00:12:49:05 - 00:13:13:27<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, and that's to give you a specific like beginning date. The like the Hayek storyline starts basically in the twenties, 1920s, although even there they're sort of like this flashback, which goes a bit further into history, like where Austrian economics sort of emerges. So that's 19th century. And then the tech track that sort of starts in the late fifties, early sixties.  </p>
<p>00:13:13:29 - 00:13:41:03<br>Marty<br>And it's fascinating because it seems having been in Bitcoin for ten years and looking back, it seems like I mean, I personally believe that we've been going astray as a society for the greater part of 100 years due to fiat money and central banks. And the implications of that are pretty massive as we talk about day in and day out within the Bitcoin community and more people are starting to talk about it more broadly.  </p>
<p>00:13:41:05 - 00:14:14:17<br>Marty<br>But the fact that it took sort of individuals and the economic theory realm and then individuals in the software development cryptography realm to really take it upon themselves to fix this problem is extremely inspiring, especially when you consider honing in on the Cypherpunk particularly they were working on this for decades and failing over and over again by failing forward with things like BGP and other cryptographic primitives and hash cache leading to Bitcoin eventually.  </p>
<p>00:14:14:17 - 00:14:33:19<br>Marty<br>And so how do you think the cypherpunk like how quickly do you think the cypherpunk when they initially set out on this journey to create a digital currency, how quickly do you think they believed it would take initially compared to how long it actually took leading up to Bitcoin's launch?  </p>
<p>00:14:33:21 - 00:15:01:13<br>Aaron<br>Well, first to remark on what you said, like it is an insanely inspiring story. And Detroit's especially let's just assume that Bitcoin sort of succeeds and we're not there yet. But if it does, it's such a major accomplishment of this small group of people. And it was a small group of people like it was, you know, in the hundreds, maybe at its very peak, there were like 2000 people on the Cypherpunk mailing list, but then most of them were just readers.  </p>
<p>00:15:01:20 - 00:15:25:25<br>Aaron<br>Like the people that were really driving it forward was such a small group. Like, if Bitcoin succeeds, then I would really expect future historians to look back on these guys, like Americans in particular, sort of look back on the Founding fathers. Right? It's it's it's a it's a small group that actually achieved something really massive, which is super interesting.  </p>
<p>00:15:25:27 - 00:15:30:21<br>Aaron<br>Now, I forgot your question. What was your actual question before I riffed on what what.  </p>
<p>00:15:30:21 - 00:15:39:01<br>Marty<br>Do you think their expectations were when they initially set out to launch a digital currency compared to how long it actually took?  </p>
<p>00:15:39:03 - 00:16:13:16<br>Aaron<br>Right. Well, keep in mind, so when the CYPHERPUNK started working on digital cash, digital cash kind of already existed, I want to say existed, even though that's a little bit of a shortcut. So yeah. David Chao. David Chao, cryptographer. He essentially invented digital cash in the eighties. And when I say digital cash in this context, I very specifically mean or he's very specifically meant a form of currency for the Internet that can be used anonymously.  </p>
<p>00:16:13:18 - 00:16:40:19<br>Aaron<br>So the strong emphasis for time in particular was on privacy and anonymity. He wasn't trying to like reinvent money or he wasn't a, you know, a gold GOLDBERG or none of that. He was just trying to achieve privacy. And this is also initially what attracted the first cypherpunk to digital cash technology. Now, it was in development at that time.  </p>
<p>00:16:40:19 - 00:17:07:00<br>Aaron<br>So Cypherpunk Swarm launched sort of 1992. At that point, David Gilmour already had his startup called Digital Cash in Amsterdam, which started in 1990. So when the Cypherpunk first thought about digital cash, they kind of thought about the thing David Gilmour's was building. That's, that's what inspired them and that's what they were trying to achieve, you could say.  </p>
<p>00:17:07:03 - 00:17:41:15<br>Aaron<br>So this was just centralized. It was a technology for banks, so banks could use it, offer it to their customers, and then the digital cash you had was basically, you know, had a one on one value backed by whatever fiat currency the bank had. So this existed. But. David Chapman, let's take some design decisions or his company was going in a certain direction or was making certain trade offs that not all the cypherpunk were very happy with.  </p>
<p>00:17:41:18 - 00:18:09:20<br>Aaron<br>So one of them was digital Cash was really sort of focusing on hardware modules. There was a strong focus on making payments in real life rather than over the internet, which sort of makes sense if you think back to the era, right, like early 1990s, most people didn't even have Internet yet. So the focus was on making, you know, in-person digital payments and making these anonymous.  </p>
<p>00:18:09:20 - 00:18:43:25<br>Aaron<br>So that was one of the focus that not all the cypherpunk were happy with default. You should just focus on, you know, Internet currency and focus on the crypto protocols. And then there was also an even bigger trade off which had to do with privacy, like in In Chumps model, the recipient of a transaction wasn't necessarily private to the sender because if the sender would collude with the bank, then they could sort of work together to, you know, anonymize the recipients.  </p>
<p>00:18:43:27 - 00:19:04:18<br>Aaron<br>And charm for it was probably a good trade off because that way extortion would be, you know, kind of impossible or, you know, other bad things would be harder to do if the recipient could be anonymized in the worst case scenario. So for banks had a more radical idea, they thought privacy is human rights should be much more absolute.  </p>
<p>00:19:04:20 - 00:19:29:16<br>Aaron<br>And whatever downsides come with that. That's just a tradeoff we have to make as society. Yes, it will be abused by, you know, terrorists or pedophiles. Yes, they will also abused this privacy in the same way that they're already abusing curtains. You can close your curtains and endorse. You can do whatever you want, and there's no, you know, police that can just come in.  </p>
<p>00:19:29:16 - 00:20:07:16<br>Aaron<br>They need a warrant like that. These are tradeoffs we make as a society. And so the cypherpunk to destroy data we should be making similar tradeoffs and we'll start to frustrate them. It's that they couldn't actually freely use the technology that Shome had developed. So there's this sort of irony that Chapman is electoral cash. Technology was a big inspiration for sci fi punks, but at the same time, the cyber punks also saw him as sort of holding up these developments because they couldn't create new forms of digital cash based on this same technology.  </p>
<p>00:20:07:18 - 00:20:30:24<br>Aaron<br>So really, for a couple of years, it was a very for a safe but very frustrating time where it seemed that this technology was sort of within reach, but they couldn't quite use it. They were trying to find ways around it, like they had this small kind of play currencies that were based on the same technology and they figured if it's not used, you know, commercially, then we won't get in too much trouble.  </p>
<p>00:20:30:27 - 00:20:53:20<br>Aaron<br>And then there were some cryptographers that were trying to make slightly different versions of charms, electronic cash, and figuring that maybe that way they could get around the patents. But for a couple of years it really sort of stalled and it wasn't going nowhere. And you could really see some of these guys like Adam Beck, like the the frustration was really growing for them.  </p>
<p>00:20:53:20 - 00:21:12:15<br>Aaron<br>I quote that in my book as well as how it wasn't really going anywhere. They were discussing if they should play ball, which I'll get is get his license. But yeah, it was stalling and it really the breakthrough happened with hash cash. So that was like between founding the site function 9 to 2 at creating hash cash. That was five years.  </p>
<p>00:21:12:15 - 00:21:21:00<br>Aaron<br>So there was five years of kind of frustration and stalling before there was this new insight of how it could actually potentially be done.  </p>
<p>00:21:21:02 - 00:21:46:23<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Before we dive in the hash cash, I think you stoked an idea in my mind, which is like laying the the groundwork for anybody listening to identify who you deem to be the equivalent of the Founding Fathers in the Cypherpunk movement specifically, and maybe a big ask to make your list of all out but in your mind, like the small group of people who were the most pivotal.  </p>
<p>00:21:46:28 - 00:21:48:27<br>Marty<br>Pivotal? Excuse me.  </p>
<p>00:21:48:29 - 00:22:17:15<br>Aaron<br>Oh, yeah, good question. I mean, Tim has to be on that list for sure. Tim, a super interesting guy, passed away a couple of years ago right before I could interview him. Unfortunately, I contacted him, but then he passed away. But he was very active. He was kind of the facto intellectual leader. MODERATOR Kind of very influential person on that list.  </p>
<p>00:22:17:16 - 00:22:40:05<br>Aaron<br>Not not certainly not the only one and definitely not some sort of official leader, because the cypherpunk sort of by design were just decentralized group or no one was in charge. There were no hierarchies. It was just this group of like minded people that shared a goal that met either in real life or on a mailing list to discuss their ideas or strategies.  </p>
<p>00:22:40:07 - 00:23:16:28<br>Aaron<br>But Tim was very pivotal. He was one of the founders and he was also the most active contributor to the mailing list where he would consistently share his ideas and what he expected cryptography to be able to achieve. And he in particular had a very radical interpretation of the potential of cryptography he saw. So he he wrote a crypto anarchist manifesto and which I have behind me on the poster, by the way, print printed out.  </p>
<p>00:23:17:01 - 00:23:52:18<br>Aaron<br>And he saw cryptography and digital cash in particular as tools to really undermine the state. It would allow people to not pay taxes, which would in turn lead to a tax revolt. And all of that also like secrets, it would be impossible to keep secrets. So including government secrets or big corporations, you couldn't keep secrets. And if you can't keep secrets, it's really hard to run a large corporation like that.  </p>
<p>00:23:52:21 - 00:24:22:02<br>Aaron<br>So he had these very radical ideas, but there were also moderates or more moderate cypherpunk out. Eric Use, for example, was a lot more moderate by each another co-founder John Gilmore and other co-founder. And then some of the more well-known guys in the individual space would, for example, be, you know, Nick Szabo, Salvini y di. They were all quite active on there as well.  </p>
<p>00:24:22:05 - 00:24:34:03<br>Aaron<br>But yeah, there were a whole bunch of people that were discussing these kinds of ideas and digital cache tools and also just general privacy technologies, of course.  </p>
<p>00:24:34:06 - 00:24:59:22<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And yes, yeah. And you have to imagine like a distributed workforce working on a combination of open source and closed source technologies aiming for this ideal. Like was there any similar type of software projects or movements like this before that Few if any. I imagine it's like Internet protocol stack, But.  </p>
<p>00:24:59:24 - 00:25:29:12<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, well as Phil Zimmermann, he was building PDP and he did start building that before the Cypherpunk existed. And then of course David Chown was building electronic cache as well before like he was the inspiration for Daft Punk's or one of the inspirations. So he was also building that before Cypherpunk. But in general, not really, or at least the types of tools that Cipher punks were developing.  </p>
<p>00:25:29:14 - 00:26:02:12<br>Aaron<br>So privacy tools essentially that didn't really exist yet before this idea. In fact, that's why the Cypherpunk were founded. That's why Tim May and Eric Fuchs and John Gilmore, why they wanted to founded Decipher Punks because there was this revolution in cryptography that had been happening since the seventies, 1970s. But to actually turn these crypto protocols into tools that people could use, that hadn't really happened yet.  </p>
<p>00:26:02:12 - 00:26:15:05<br>Aaron<br>So that's what I try to achieve and that's why they gathered this groups of hackers and friends and computer scientists to start building this and start realizing this.  </p>
<p>00:26:15:07 - 00:26:36:28<br>Marty<br>And in your research, going back and reading the mailing list and all the papers that were put out, what was I'm trying to get at is like, what was the what was it like the coordination efforts, like in the beginning? Did you see like the coordination of these projects evolve? So you imagine these people are doing this for the first time.  </p>
<p>00:26:36:28 - 00:26:59:04<br>Marty<br>It's never been done before. Outside of a few projects before the CYPHERPUNK is launched, like what was. And then you compare it to a project like Bitcoin Court today or Linux and all these other open source projects, like how, how much of a rough path that they have trying to learn how to coordinate and work on this together in a distributed fashion.  </p>
<p>00:26:59:06 - 00:27:30:21<br>Aaron<br>Well, at the very beginning they started to meet like at someone's apartment, right at Eric Lucas's apartment. And they were actually sort of roleplaying how electronic cash, for example, could operate or how like the precursor to Tor, like remodelers, how that would actually work. So they were sort of playing this out with physical envelopes and, you know, pieces of paper and monopoly money or whatever they were using to sort of play these actual games.  </p>
<p>00:27:30:23 - 00:27:40:26<br>Aaron<br>Yeah. On the mailing list I did. And good question. Like you mean the actual tech developments, right.  </p>
<p>00:27:40:28 - 00:27:55:18<br>Marty<br>Yeah. What I'm trying is like the culture like, like how did it sort of form and evolve around building these tools via mailing list and the combination of that meeting in person actually writing and testing code.  </p>
<p>00:27:55:20 - 00:28:32:23<br>Aaron<br>Yeah. Well I think it was around this same time. So around the cypherpunk era that Linux was also introduced and that really sort of reshaped the culture of how to cooperate on building software, open source software, specifically in general. Like before that there was still like free software exists, which is Stallman had been working on free software, but there was still this ethos of you need this sort of small group of experts to to build this and to fit it in to make sure it's bug free.  </p>
<p>00:28:32:23 - 00:29:09:19<br>Aaron<br>And this tended to happen in like computer environments, like computer labs at universities. And it was really with Linux that this kind of got flipped and it became just this collaborative model across the Internet where everyone could contribute. I would say the Cypherpunk mailing list specifically was more a place to sort of discuss designs and discuss ideas and discuss potential rather than a place where the actual developments happened.  </p>
<p>00:29:09:20 - 00:29:21:13<br>Aaron<br>It was more a place to sort of find each other and they did share software or they did share code, but it's not like it happened on the list itself. That was more a discussion forum type of situation.  </p>
<p>00:29:21:16 - 00:29:41:17<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And then bringing this back to the timeline of charms e cache, sort of frustrating people and then atom back releasing hash cache. Why was hash cache so pivotal on this journey towards Bitcoin in your opinion?  </p>
<p>00:29:41:20 - 00:30:12:12<br>Aaron<br>Yeah. So Adam Beck designed hash cache initially as postage, so it was meant to be postage and the reason so postage for the internet, for email essentially, and the reason that was very necessary at that time was because a, I mentioned that cypherpunk for using mailers. So this was a way to email someone anonymously, email someone without that person knowing that it was you who emailed them.  </p>
<p>00:30:12:15 - 00:30:44:22<br>Aaron<br>So these were cypherpunk tools that Cypherpunk were running, like they were running remodelers servers, but servers were increasingly being spammed. So there were, you know, basically some sort of denial of service attack seemed to be going on where, you know, thousands of emails were just being sent through the servers consisting of gibberish, it seemed like. And these servers became too expensive for some to actually operate.  </p>
<p>00:30:44:24 - 00:31:13:05<br>Aaron<br>So this is why the Cypherpunk specifically wanted to create something akin to digital postage is something that would come at a cost. So sorry, something that would make sending an email cost something. And they did think about using electronic cash for this like jobs. Electronic cash. Just put a little bit of cash in an email and only if it has this e cache in the email would you accept it or would the remainder accept it.  </p>
<p>00:31:13:07 - 00:31:38:03<br>Aaron<br>But ecos was not quite ready for this. It was not quite designed in such a way that it could be used for this. So then Adam Beck came up with this idea for hash cash, which in order to send an email, the sender would have to perform a little bit of proof of work. So, you know, your computer does a bunch of computational cycles to prove that you actually spent energy.  </p>
<p>00:31:38:05 - 00:32:12:06<br>Aaron<br>And then only if this proof of work was included in an email what the remainder accepted or what the recipient acceptance, what is really introduced. So this was the original intent for it for for cash. Cash. But what it introduced was digital scarcity, essentially, right? So some way to create something that's digital, but that proves some sort of expense of real world resources, real energy, real computing power.  </p>
<p>00:32:12:09 - 00:32:41:20<br>Aaron<br>And this really inspired a number of the cyber punks to take their thinking about electronic cash in a new direction. So where previously the idea was we're going to create this or cash is sort of operated by a bank and it's backed by fiat currency. Now, they really started to think more in this way of digital gold kind of thing, like maybe we can have a digital cash that's not backed by something else.  </p>
<p>00:32:41:20 - 00:33:11:10<br>Aaron<br>So they were having these discussions on the Cypherpunk mailing list, some of which I detail in my book about whether digital cash actually needs to be backed, whether it just needs to be limited to it, or whether it should be considered cash if it's not backed or evidence backed or so there were starting to really consider this. And when hash cash was introduced a year later, you see these other digital cash protocols being proposed.  </p>
<p>00:33:11:10 - 00:33:43:25<br>Aaron<br>So the most notable ones are the examples Bitcoin TED White eyes B money, which both both used is scarcity. There's provable scarcity, there's proof of work as sort of the foundation, the fundaments for that digital cash projects. Now these digital cash frauds have other problems, but you can really see this thinking to be embraced and sort of taking the whole concept of electronic cash in a in a new direction from that point out.  </p>
<p>00:33:43:27 - 00:33:49:11<br>Marty<br>And did I forget typical old or B money never leave the idea phase or they.  </p>
<p>00:33:49:14 - 00:34:14:10<br>Aaron<br>No, no they were both just proposals. They were they were proposed very briefly after one another. I was only like a month in between them, but yet both had, Wolf, fundamental problems. And maybe that's why they weren't like they couldn't have been implemented, basically. Or, you know, you could have sort of tried, but there were very real problems that were unsolved still.  </p>
<p>00:34:14:12 - 00:34:39:06<br>Aaron<br>So, yeah, they were only ever ideas, proposals where Bitcoin is is a pretty, I would say relatively detailed proposal B money is a little bit more had to wavy like that. B money is an even rougher idea that bit goals. But yeah, both of them were not implemented.  </p>
<p>00:34:39:09 - 00:35:03:09<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I discuss B money with Drew Bansal from Unchained probably about a month, month and a half ago. Now at this point we were he was explaining how the auction to create B money really doomed it from the beginning because you didn't really have this fixed supply that people could anchor to sort of had figured out a way to coordinate these auctions, to birth the supply into existence, Right?  </p>
<p>00:35:03:09 - 00:35:46:06<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, I would say b b money was it was an interesting idea. It was sort of almost why I kind of thinking out loud is how I sort of read it. He by the time he published B Money, he had grown sort of disillusioned with the whole digital cash movement, actually, or with the whole Cypherpunk movement, even because he, he felt that all these tools, that cipher banks were developing and all the ways they were thinking about improving privacy, it turned out that no one was interested, Right?  </p>
<p>00:35:46:06 - 00:36:08:11<br>Aaron<br>The Internet's had by this time started to become a real thing, and no one was using any of these privacy tools to the cypherpunk, you know, were putting their heart and soul in. No, no, no one gave a damn. So he also expected that even if they could realize digital cash, probably no one would even use it because.  </p>
<p>00:36:08:11 - 00:36:32:09<br>Aaron<br>People are perfectly, perfectly comfortable using credit cards or PayPal or whatever, you know, privacy infringing technologies are out there. So what's the point? Sort of. So my reading of the situation is that y I had been thinking about it for a while and at some point he kind of grew disillusioned and he just sort of said, All right, here's what I got so far.  </p>
<p>00:36:32:12 - 00:36:42:12<br>Aaron<br>If someone wants to take this ball and run with it, go ahead. But it was still far from a finished protocol, but it had some interesting ideas for sure.  </p>
<p>00:36:42:15 - 00:37:08:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And how much do you think that disillusionment on the part of way DI, was, the fact that he was so close to everything going on, almost following this for years it didn't seem like there was mainstream adoption or even appetite to adopt like how much of that was just a product of how nation the internet was and consumers access to the Internet was at that time?  </p>
<p>00:37:08:17 - 00:37:41:01<br>Aaron<br>Well, I would say that in recent years we've seen a bit of a resurgence of, you know, sort of the cypherpunk ethos. Right. And Part of this is Bitcoin itself. But you also see you see it in other domains as well. You know, we we have signaled these days WhatsApp like implement cryptography. So clearly people at least pretends to care, companies at least pretends to care, which probably means there's at least some market demand for it like people.  </p>
<p>00:37:41:08 - 00:38:16:13<br>Aaron<br>Also, the Snowden revelations, of course, were big part of that, think it's it's re-inspired thinking about privacy technologies or the lack thereof. But yeah if you recall definitely like the late nineties early 2000s when the Internet was still pretty new, privacy was just not a topic that anyone really seemed to care about or mind. And so I can certainly see, you know, the cypherpunk that was there very early to the to the Internet.  </p>
<p>00:38:16:13 - 00:38:32:18<br>Aaron<br>And then when the masses sort of come and no one cares about what they thought everyone would care about that, that must be a very disappointing realization. And it was for many of them. So yeah, the Cypherpunk movement sort of dissolved around that time.  </p>
<p>00:38:32:21 - 00:38:55:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So this was like 1998 when B money was released. I'm sure there's a bunch of where the idea was released. There was probably discussion for some amount of time and then obviously there's a ten year gap between that and Bitcoin. The Bitcoin white paper appearing on the on the mailing list in October of 2008 and what happened between that ten year period that.  </p>
<p>00:38:55:17 - 00:38:55:27<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, well.  </p>
<p>00:38:55:27 - 00:38:58:13<br>Marty<br>Their disillusionment if you will.  </p>
<p>00:38:58:15 - 00:39:30:12<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, well there's one more interesting digital cash project in between these which I highlight in my book. I will also say there were a lot of sort of electronic cash systems in name only during that time. So there were a lot of start ups and yeah, technology companies that were selling or introducing something which they called cash the Internet in some way or another.  </p>
<p>00:39:30:15 - 00:39:57:00<br>Aaron<br>But it, it didn't have any privacy future stuff for sure. So in whatever way, whatever they associated with cash, probably something like fast and cheap transactions. But privacy was just not part of any of these designs. But the interesting sort of cypherpunk technology late, very late cypherpunk technology that still came out in between B money and Bitcoin was ARPA.  </p>
<p>00:39:57:05 - 00:40:25:29<br>Aaron<br>So how very, very telling for his character probably he sort of kept his hand to shut them up. He, he was always very interested in new digital cash projects that were introduced on the Cypherpunk mailing list. It was very often sort of the first to jump on it, try to understand it, and came back to the mailing list, sort of try to explain it in his own words to other people on that list.  </p>
<p>00:40:26:02 - 00:40:57:23<br>Aaron<br>So he was a very prominent figure there, especially in this electronic cash sort of subsegment of the Cypherpunk community. And he he deeply he was still motivated and it was almost certainly one of the very few like, I think Nick Szabo when I spoke with him, he said his estimation were that there were maybe like three or four people so interested in this, like by The Smiths through thousands, but Delphine was definitely one of them.  </p>
<p>00:40:57:26 - 00:41:41:00<br>Aaron<br>He was still interested in specifically kind of realizing bits gold and B money type of ideas. Now what he actually built was what he called a very simplified version of Bitcoin, at which it had to be because Bitcoin was quite complex. There's like different layers to that design. So ARPA was a very simplified white version, but it was kind of interesting that it leveraged sort of the transparency of free software so that you even have any couldn't cheat because it was a centralized system.  </p>
<p>00:41:41:03 - 00:42:02:13<br>Aaron<br>So it sort of went back from decentralized proposals like B money and Bitcoin sort of for and then it went back to our power, which was centralized. But how many used a remote attestation technology, which was a special IBM chip in combination with free software to sort of prove that the protocol did exactly what it had to do.  </p>
<p>00:42:02:20 - 00:42:29:05<br>Aaron<br>Very relevant idea for Bitcoin as well. Of course. So so this technology came somewhere in between and interestingly, it was also actually implemented. So it did work. It was really a thing people could use. A kind of interesting. Is that correct? Maxwell was also one of the contributors to this project because developers, of course, but it never really caught on.  </p>
<p>00:42:29:07 - 00:42:57:16<br>Aaron<br>This is probably in large part because ARPA didn't have a solution for the inflation problem. So the currency was created with proof of work. But as computers become faster over time, it becomes easier to create proof of work. So you sort of have this intrinsic inflation because of that. And, you know, if you know that your money is going to inflate, it's not very strong incentive to want to accept it, of course.  </p>
<p>00:42:57:16 - 00:43:09:06<br>Aaron<br>So that's probably a big reason why ARPA didn't take off, or at least that's what I think that's what Maxwell thinks as well. But it it's operated work for a while.  </p>
<p>00:43:09:09 - 00:43:46:20<br>Marty<br>So that gets to the question of what is the core innovation of Bitcoin And that's again, go back to the conversation with Dhruv. He wrote a piece recently that really puts the case forward that digital scarcity and fixed supply 21 million with a predetermined supply schedule. Release schedule is the key innovation. Obviously with the combination of proof of work, with the difficulty adjustment in leveraging EDSA to create private public key pairs, all that combined really allowed Bitcoin to succeed in the way that it has over the first 15 years.  </p>
<p>00:43:46:20 - 00:43:54:09<br>Marty<br>But it was really that last piece of the puzzle figuring out like, Hey, we need a fixed supply out of the gate that's predetermined.  </p>
<p>00:43:54:11 - 00:44:18:09<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, I think the big thing Bitcoin did was getting the incentives right. And as I mentioned, ARPA basically works like if you just wanted to use digital cash on our POW, it works or even e cash, you know, the technology works, but also your cash was not adopted probably for the same reason. Like there's no strong incentive to adopt e cash like some people care about privacy.  </p>
<p>00:44:18:09 - 00:44:59:12<br>Aaron<br>Sure. But a lot of people don't care about privacy. While, you know, if there's a monetary or if there's a financial incentive to adopt that currency, well, now all of a sudden, a lot more people will care. So I also think that's that's a big piece of the puzzle that Satoshi sort of got. Right. If you look at these different electronic cash projects that preceded Bitcoin, then almost all different parts of the puzzle are there in one of them, like Bitcoin is already very much has something that starts to resemble a blockchain with like this chain of hashes essentially.  </p>
<p>00:44:59:14 - 00:45:33:26<br>Aaron<br>B Money already introduced this idea that everyone should run their own node in a way that everyone should keep track of. Everyone else's balances are powerful leverage is this free software idea that anyone can check the code. Of course, hash guys is proof of work like a lot of these tools. Or were there a lot of the parts of the puzzle were there and Satoshi definitely, in my view, was all he put it together in a way that's not just very elegant, but also the incentives.  </p>
<p>00:45:33:26 - 00:45:50:07<br>Aaron<br>Now, for the first time aligned, there was actually a reason for people to want to get some of these coins because the value might go up. And that's that's a big motivator to get digital cash, even if you don't care about the privacy aspect of it. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:45:50:10 - 00:46:14:20<br>Marty<br>And when Satoshi hit the mailing list with the white paper in October of oh eight, in your mind, how did this what reaction that this cause the greater cypherpunk movement to have? Obviously how funny was in early I was way I was highly skeptical in the beginning. What was the reemergence of this idea of digital cash in the way that Satoshi brought it back?  </p>
<p>00:46:14:22 - 00:46:18:05<br>Marty<br>How did it sort of disrupts that that community?  </p>
<p>00:46:18:08 - 00:46:49:29<br>Aaron<br>Right. Well, you mentioned wide I he was emailed before it even hit the mailing list. So both at back and wide, I were reached out to privately but by Satoshi and both of them weren't were weren't buying it so to say which to a large extent has to do with the dissolution meant that I already mentioned and also there had been so many digital cash products that just went nowhere.  </p>
<p>00:46:50:02 - 00:47:18:00<br>Aaron<br>So it's very understandable. I would say, you know, someone you've never heard of reaches out, says I've, you know, I fixed the problem. It's very natural to be skeptical. I would say that that's totally normal, I think. And that's also what you saw on the Cypherpunk mailing list for the most part. So yeah, the initial responses were definitely either indifferent.  </p>
<p>00:47:18:01 - 00:47:44:23<br>Aaron<br>And I should mention, by the way, at this point, the Cypherpunk mailing list had, for all practical reasons, been dissolved and now the sort of more serious cryptography mailing list have taken over. Like a lot of the same people started to discuss their ideas and strategies there. So it was very similar, but it was, it was a bit more moderated to limit the amount of flame wars and spam and that sort of stuff.  </p>
<p>00:47:44:25 - 00:48:09:00<br>Aaron<br>But yeah, for the most part I would say was indifference. And then those that did pay attention to the email either didn't believe in it or just didn't understand it. I caught some of these emails in my book, or at least some of the subparts of It's like I forgot who it actually was. I forgot the name of the person that sent this email.  </p>
<p>00:48:09:00 - 00:48:39:27<br>Aaron<br>But someone, funnily enough, suggests that Bitcoin seems like a pretty good idea, but it should have a difficulty adjustment algorithm, which it did. So clearly you didn't understand the proposal very well, which I should also say also very understandable. You know, we live in the 2020 for now, and now if you get into Bitcoin and you type it into YouTube, there's like a million colorful explainer videos and everyone wrote an article or a book like me about how Bitcoin works.  </p>
<p>00:48:39:27 - 00:49:17:13<br>Aaron<br>And but if, if it's 2028 and you've never heard of this and there's just this white paper from this one guy you don't know and you're sort of just reading through it. Yeah, obviously most people wouldn't understand it perfectly the first time around. So I'm not like judging these people just noticeable that they didn't quite get it. But yeah, again, the noticeable exception is of course how Vinny So he'll Vinnie still still at it just like on the Cypherpunk mailing list often sort of defers to take an interest, try to understand it, ask questions, try to explain it to other people.  </p>
<p>00:49:17:21 - 00:49:34:22<br>Aaron<br>And you still see this in 2008 when Bitcoin is first introduced by Satoshi that Hal is still this guy. That sort of adjusts what's in research. And just like that's not the English word. What's the English word mati for?  </p>
<p>00:49:34:22 - 00:49:36:16<br>Marty<br>Or there's the Aztec.  </p>
<p>00:49:36:18 - 00:49:38:11<br>Aaron<br>Is that just an English word.  </p>
<p>00:49:38:13 - 00:49:45:01<br>Marty<br>Enthusiastic? I don't know. I don't know. The etymology definitely is an English word.  </p>
<p>00:49:45:03 - 00:50:23:15<br>Aaron<br>Okay, I think we're good then. Yeah, but so how? Vinnie is definitely still one of these guys. Pretty much the only one who still And to Shostak about this new idea and sort of and he starts to help Satoshi as well for the monster follow with some bug fixes that kind of stuff yeah but but but pretty quickly like if you read it's back now like within like a couple of maybe like a couple dozen emails, maybe not even a couple dozen.  </p>
<p>00:50:23:17 - 00:50:51:07<br>Aaron<br>The the discussion about Bitcoin is sort of cut short by the moderator of the cryptography mailing list, Perry Metzger. It in this way of, you know, let's see code first pick up before we continue discussing this which Rector retrospectively it's kind of funny. It's like you know me I'm like a you know, I'm digging through this archives, kind of like as a historian doing my research.  </p>
<p>00:50:51:07 - 00:51:07:07<br>Aaron<br>And then this super revolutionary idea was invented. And then you've got this guy cutting down the discussion like, no, want to read what is what everyone want had to say about it? And this is like a goldmine and now it's over. So, yeah.  </p>
<p>00:51:07:09 - 00:51:15:01<br>Marty<br>Was that even correct? Because Satoshi say that he wrote the code before he wrote the paper because he wanted to make sure it worked.  </p>
<p>00:51:15:03 - 00:51:33:11<br>Aaron<br>He started writing the code before the paper. Yeah, that's right. But he published the paper before the code. So there were still a couple of months between paper and code, of course. But yeah, he said he'd been working on it for like two years before publishing the white paper. That's right. That's true.  </p>
<p>00:51:33:13 - 00:51:45:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So obviously, January 3rd, 2009, when the protocol, or at least on the Genesis block, was behind January 1st.  </p>
<p>00:51:45:18 - 00:51:53:21<br>Aaron<br>They referred us to Genesis block and then January 8th it was actually announced, shared on the on the cryptography mailing list. Mm hmm.  </p>
<p>00:51:53:23 - 00:51:57:25<br>Marty<br>And at that point, it was still just the genesis block or, you know, other blocks have been mined.  </p>
<p>00:51:57:26 - 00:52:34:19<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, yeah. Yes, yeah, yeah, yeah. It was just the genesis block embedded in the code. Of course, there had been no or at least, you know, we can't be completely 100% sure in retrospect, but at least according to the timestamps in the blocks, these were all found after the code was released on the mailing list. Now, you know, if you want to get conspiratorial or whatever, it's of course, possible that Satoshi would have sort of mined these before releasing the codes and embedding fake timestamps in the blocks.  </p>
<p>00:52:34:19 - 00:52:43:24<br>Aaron<br>But there's no indication that he actually did that. I don't think he did that. But we can't be 100% sure based on blockchain alone.  </p>
<p>00:52:43:26 - 00:52:45:21<br>Marty<br>Well.  </p>
<p>00:52:45:24 - 00:52:52:27<br>Aaron<br>We can't be 100% sure, of course, that the Genesis block was not mined before January 1st because it had this headline in the Genesis.  </p>
<p>00:52:52:27 - 00:53:16:00<br>Marty<br>BLOCK Yeah. And for anybody out there listening the beauty of the Genesis block, not only with the headline in the Coinbase transaction, but it can't be spent. So that was sort of an interesting decision that Satoshi made, like, Hey, I'm going to mine this first block just to get the start up, but I'm going be able to spend any of the Bitcoin that's officially mined.  </p>
<p>00:53:16:03 - 00:53:26:23<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, very cool touch. I think like even Satoshi himself had to earn his coins just like everyone else. That's true.  </p>
<p>00:53:26:25 - 00:53:48:12<br>Marty<br>And so what do you think, having done all this deep dives into the history of the economic theory and the Cypherpunk movement that led to Bitcoin, what was the emergence of Satoshi in the Bitcoin projects like? What impact did that have on the Cypherpunk movement overall, particularly over the last 15 years? Like, would you say the movement's stronger than ever?  </p>
<p>00:53:48:13 - 00:53:56:18<br>Marty<br>Has it gone astray at all? Was Toshi a figure that breathed life back into it?  </p>
<p>00:53:56:21 - 00:54:35:04<br>Aaron<br>I mean, I think the ideas and the ideals of the cypherpunk live on, but the movement itself is not really in so far. It's still a movement. It's definitely not what it used to be like. It used to be, as I mentioned, both the sort of in-person thing in California, where at the beginning maybe like 50 people showed up and then it became this early Internet phenomenon with the mailing list, which, as I mentioned at its peak had like 2000 people on there, although most of these people were just reading.  </p>
<p>00:54:35:06 - 00:55:13:11<br>Aaron<br>And yeah, I mean, today there's still people that call themselves cipher punks, obviously. And some of the technologies live on Bitcoin being an obvious one, but you could also count, you know, something like Tor or even something like Signal. I think that's perfectly fair to consider. Cypherpunk Technologies. WikiLeaks, of course, was also a very cypherpunk thing. Assange himself was on the Cypherpunk mailing list, so these ideas live on, but you have to really consider it's still a cypherpunk movement, not in the way it was anyway.  </p>
<p>00:55:13:14 - 00:55:47:00<br>Aaron<br>There's no central mailing lists like that anymore. They're still the cryptography mailing lists, which is still going on. So that's still living on. But I think, you know, someone like Tim May was such a sort of central figure and his ideas and his contributions that that really sort of attracted a lot of attention. And it sets the tone to a large extent for the Cypherpunk community, I would say.  </p>
<p>00:55:47:03 - 00:55:57:25<br>Aaron<br>And so with him gone and with the mailing list gone and I think it's a bit of a stretch to say that there's still a cypherpunk community, but the idea is live on.  </p>
<p>00:55:57:28 - 00:56:18:21<br>Marty<br>Yeah, maybe these are communities movements, if you will, that need to be somewhat ephemeral. People take their ideas or take them somewhere else. But another community, maybe that's like the the whack a mole that's necessary to actually get these technologies into the hands of the mainstream users.  </p>
<p>00:56:18:23 - 00:56:47:08<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, that's a good point. I mean, even the mailing list, like if if the philosophy of the cypherpunk is sort of this decentralized movement that has no structure and no no one, you know, dictating where it goes, then it's kind of natural, of course, that it just goes wherever and the mailing list, for example, itself was hosted for a long time by John Gilmore.  </p>
<p>00:56:47:11 - 00:57:22:12<br>Aaron<br>He at some point didn't want to do it. So then kind of the big migration happened. It migrated to Usenet for a while and then there were different servers sort of hosting that. And as I mentioned, the cryptography mailing list took it over. But yeah, I would I think that's probably a pretty good assessment that almost by its very nature of being this decentralized, leaderless structure of this thing, it just kind of spreads to wherever it goes, wherever and it becomes hard to sort of pin down in any central place or point.  </p>
<p>00:57:22:15 - 00:57:48:12<br>Marty<br>Yeah, and one thing going through this history, I can't help but think of how important timing is in the timing of when Satoshi released the white paper that eventually launched the protocol was so beautifully perfect in the midst of the great financial crisis. Obviously with the message in the Genesis block, he was certainly making somewhat of a political statement when he launched the protocol.  </p>
<p>00:57:48:14 - 00:58:04:09<br>Marty<br>And I think it's clear to me at least it was an idea digital cache more broadly whose time had come and Satoshi, luckily for us, figured out the perfect ingredients to get something together that that actually works.  </p>
<p>00:58:04:11 - 00:58:49:18<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, that's that's still an incredible part of the story, right. How perfect the timing was. And also, again, like if you imagine let's, you know, imagine that Bitcoin does become this big success. You know, hyper Bitcoin inflation happens like future historians must be so incredibly astonished by the timing of it all. And just a the the sort of bottom up nature of it's like there's this big financial crisis going on and the solution that somehow found on this niche mailing list with this paper by this anonymous guy, it's it's it's kind of mind blowing if.  </p>
<p>00:58:49:18 - 00:58:54:10<br>Marty<br>You had something as biblical and think about it and you're exactly right.  </p>
<p>00:58:54:11 - 00:58:56:29<br>Aaron<br>Yeah. Yeah. It's really incredible.  </p>
<p>00:58:57:01 - 00:59:20:13<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And then speaking to timing to other I like charm. Great idea with mints. Like, maybe he just needed to wait until bitcoin was launched. And you can build more. You can build mints. The correct way, leveraging something like the Fadiman protocol. There was a talk that Hal Finney gave back in the nineties about, uh, zero knowledge proofs and how they could be implemented.  </p>
<p>00:59:20:13 - 00:59:42:04<br>Marty<br>And now people are figuring out ways to leverage the zeek piece to help with initial block download and bitcoin like these ideas that were brought into existence decades ago. Maybe the timing wasn't right, like it just took bitcoin to be released and then you could implement the correct way, which is also fascinating to think about.  </p>
<p>00:59:42:06 - 01:00:01:19<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, it's really cool to see some of these technologies, ICOs being the most obvious example, I would say. Yeah, really cool to see that being rediscovered. Like when I started my research that wasn't the case, that also this really sort of happens during that I was writing about this stuff. I'm not saying it has anything to do with me.  </p>
<p>01:00:01:26 - 01:00:22:22<br>Aaron<br>That's not the claim at all. I'm just saying it's interesting to see how like as I was sort of discovering these things, it's also been rediscovered in a Bitcoin context and people now actually start to bill built these technologies on Bitcoin, which seems like, yeah, a very good match to me. Anyways, David Shoham is not really a Bitcoin or is.  </p>
<p>01:00:22:25 - 01:00:25:02<br>Marty<br>He started his own privacy coin then he.  </p>
<p>01:00:25:05 - 01:00:46:29<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, he was involved with like Elixir for a little while. I have no idea what happened with that, although I think Elixir was supposed to also support bitcoin like it was supposed to also be a mixer for bitcoin. But I'm, I'm going off my suboptimal memory at this point and I don't know for sure what the idea was there.  </p>
<p>01:00:47:02 - 01:00:49:07<br>Aaron<br>I don't think it went anywhere, right?  </p>
<p>01:00:49:09 - 01:01:18:04<br>Marty<br>I don't think so. But it is interesting, right? Because I imagine Trump did that because he's looking at Bitcoin in the tradeoffs. It's a totally made particularly as they pertain to privacy, not what he probably would have wanted as a privacy idealist. Um, and it's interesting now that Jimmy events are being launched on top of bitcoin, which give Bitcoin users their privacy within these 30 minutes, or just his signal mints like cashew.  </p>
<p>01:01:18:06 - 01:01:19:29<br>Aaron<br>Um, yeah, well, he's.  </p>
<p>01:01:19:29 - 01:01:41:08<br>Marty<br>Kicking himself in the butt like, oh, I mean, I, this patient thought creatively about this. Like, you can't have it. It's just going to take time. And in my mind, like, I think the tradeoffs that were made as a pretense of privacy, while they're hard to stomach for a lot, I do think they're worthwhile at the protocol level and you can just push that up to other layers.  </p>
<p>01:01:41:11 - 01:02:09:10<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, it also it's interesting, I mentioned Bitcoin, for example, this idea and how that was pretty complex. I mean, it's not it's kind of complex, but the reason it's complex for the reason I say that is because it actually also had it different layers essentially. So it also had like sort of this base layer idea which can be, you know, that was textual bit gold, so to say.  </p>
<p>01:02:09:10 - 01:02:55:10<br>Aaron<br>There was sort of this digital scarcity, this proof of work type of currency. But then he imagines a sort of free banking layer on top of it, which would be more suited to make the actual payments and to make the actual transactions on. So there's also, you know, there's very similar to the direction that even today sort of the prominence Bitcoin developers or, you know, Bitcoin thinkers are kind of thinking about scaling like this seems like a plausible way that Bitcoin might actually scales, you know, through layers and through some sort of whether it's sediment or whether it's different types of, you know, whether you want to call them banks or what different trust models  </p>
<p>01:02:55:10 - 01:03:21:14<br>Aaron<br>and how these are then sort of conducted over a lightning network like it really resembles something that an example was speculating Bitcoins should be designed as. So you see these echoes and you see these lessons from the past sort of being either rediscovered to reinvent it. And it's definitely the lineage is clearly there with the whole digital cash project and Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:03:21:17 - 01:03:47:13<br>Marty<br>Yeah, speaking of the free banking conversation and Bitcoin and how much that big old project influence how Finney it's funny, in the early days in December 2010 when he took to the Bitcoin Talk Talk forum to basically lay out the case like, Hey, we're going to scale in a free banking model where where Bitcoin will be a reserve asset, these private banks and they'll issue, he said, their own currencies.  </p>
<p>01:03:47:13 - 01:03:59:10<br>Marty<br>I don't think he could have foresaw something like the settlement protocol or lightning materializing at that time, but you could see he was directionally right. If you believe this is the optimal scaling path.  </p>
<p>01:03:59:13 - 01:04:28:22<br>Aaron<br>Well, you could argue that Fetterman in particular does sort of issue its own currency, right? They're tokens that are backed by Bitcoin. So in that sense, it's actually very similar. Now, I don't think Betterment is using fractional reserve or at least that's not the plan, right? While this sort of Seldon type of idea to use fractional reserve explicitly, those actually in earlier and earlier drafts of my book explored this whole part of free banking and George Sergeant's ideas.  </p>
<p>01:04:28:23 - 01:05:00:14<br>Aaron<br>But I ended up not using most of that because it was kind of speculating about the future of Bitcoin. While I really wanted my book to be grounded in the history and just sort of, you know, what we know rather than what might be in the future. But George Seldon still makes a couple of appearances for the book here and there, like he was on the same mailing list as example and White Eye and a couple of these people said it was the Cypherpunk mailing list.  </p>
<p>01:05:00:17 - 01:05:27:24<br>Aaron<br>And then there was also the Lipsyte mailing list, which was a more focused mailing list on digital cash. And that also had some of these free banking types on there. And they were sort of sharing their their ideas with, you know, some of the cipher banks on there. So these include George Selden and Lawrence White. So so that makes a couple of appearances in my book, like Hayek's idea of free banking, as I mentioned earlier, is sort of a big frat from my book.  </p>
<p>01:05:27:24 - 01:05:37:17<br>Aaron<br>And there you can see the limits to how this idea started to inspire some of the cypherpunk as well, specifically through this all their mailing list. For example.  </p>
<p>01:05:37:19 - 01:06:07:21<br>Marty<br>Yeah, that's fast is again, going back to the beauty of like the economic side of things, like the economic theorists really recognizing that the cryptographers were on to something that if they were going to if they were going to put their economic theory into practice, they're going to leverage something that the cipher punks were building and sort of combining their their minds to to really push this forward.  </p>
<p>01:06:07:24 - 01:06:12:12<br>Marty<br>It's just incredibly fascinating. All right. Still.  </p>
<p>01:06:12:14 - 01:06:42:02<br>Aaron<br>Yes. And this idea also emerged within the ASTROBEE in the community. So this was this sort of futuristic community that had all of these ideas about life extension, cloning, space colonization, like all kinds of wild ideas. But there were serious about it. And the way they believed it could be achieved was by eliminating the role of government in society.  </p>
<p>01:06:42:02 - 01:07:31:20<br>Aaron<br>Essentially, they saw government as sort of a leech on economic activity, and they believed if you just let the government sorry, if you let the people experiment, and if you let the free market reign, we can achieve all of these interesting technologies that would reshape society and even transform humanity itself. And a number of the Cypherpunk and Bitcoin sort of followers or, you know, pre prehistory godfathers like Salvini, they were also on this X Shopian list and it was how many that introduced digital cash to this list as a way to sort of get governments out of your life, specifically sort of get government out of your finances like the privacy angle and then some  </p>
<p>01:07:31:20 - 01:08:16:24<br>Aaron<br>of the extra openness like the founder was called Max Moore. He's still around, by the way. He he he really saw this potential, which you just mentioned, of leveraging this electronic cash technology not just for privacy, but also for monetary reform to sort of realize Hayek's ideas about, money, that that's that's really something he started pushing for any ideas he started to spread, including to some of these other cypherpunk that were that were there, which as I mentioned, included not just health any, but widening the tsavo to me like a bunch of these guys were there and getting these ideas and sharing these ideas.  </p>
<p>01:08:16:27 - 01:08:45:07<br>Marty<br>It's interesting now that you mention that go to that story, I think we're at the beginning of a similar story with this, um, uh, effective acceleration movement and Bitcoin. I think there's a lot of people in Bitcoin particularly looking at what's going on in the HCC movement, which is predominantly being driven by people working on artificial intelligence. I mean like, hey, I think we should, we should talk.  </p>
<p>01:08:45:07 - 01:09:08:07<br>Marty<br>I think there's some way Bitcoin can play into this. And I think our philosophical ideas of where society should be going are pretty aligned. And you could see the sort of intermingling of the Bitcoin culture and this ekyc culture beginning to collide and really work with each other to to take us to the next step forward.  </p>
<p>01:09:08:09 - 01:09:11:26<br>Aaron<br>So I don't know what is this easy. Can you explain?  </p>
<p>01:09:11:29 - 01:09:35:26<br>Marty<br>Uh, so it's a play on effective altruism, which Sam Bankman-fried was a big advocate of. It's effective Accelerationism, which is there's two competing forces in the world right now, those who want to accelerate and those who want to decelerate these. So acceleration is aligning more with the was a utopian mailing list that you described.  </p>
<p>01:09:36:02 - 01:09:41:02<br>Aaron<br>It's shopian. Yeah, it was a community. They had a magazine and a mailing list as well. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:09:41:04 - 01:10:07:01<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So they're probably the extra peons of the modern day really saying, Hey government, get out of the way. We shouldn't create regulatory moats around artificial intelligence. You should let people experiment with this and create their own models, and they're ardently juxtaposing themselves versus those who would like to see regulatory boats and the deceleration of the proliferation of these technologies.  </p>
<p>01:10:07:04 - 01:10:12:21<br>Aaron<br>Right. Interesting. Yeah, that sounds pretty similar. That sounds like shopian. They're basically shopian. It sounds like.  </p>
<p>01:10:12:23 - 01:10:36:03<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And so, like, it does seem like particularly when you think of things like L for a too and all the lessons that the Bitcoin minus mining industry has learned with the energy sector, I think A.I. is very controversial these days, but I use it myself. It is certainly useful in many contexts. It can be harmful too, but all technologies can be used for good or bad.  </p>
<p>01:10:36:05 - 01:10:38:10<br>Marty<br>You can make the argument at the end of the day.  </p>
<p>01:10:38:13 - 01:10:42:00<br>Aaron<br>What do you use it for? Like text, text.  </p>
<p>01:10:42:00 - 01:10:49:15<br>Marty<br>Image generation that we're using it to help curate content on the site and then create thumbnails?  </p>
<p>01:10:49:17 - 01:10:50:14<br>Aaron<br>Right, Right.  </p>
<p>01:10:50:16 - 01:11:32:13<br>Marty<br>Like this will be put through a transcription Artificial intelligence while the transcript of this episode within minutes after we plug it in and then other things, but like the conversions of Bitcoin and I, I think it's symbiotic. I think there's ways you can leverage artificial intelligence to have something like more efficient channel management on the Lightning Network, more efficient fee estimation softwares than I think Bitcoin, particularly over the Lightning Network, can make the air products more efficient, where if you want to get rid of your chargeback, risk you're spending a lot of money on the compute.  </p>
<p>01:11:32:13 - 01:12:03:24<br>Marty<br>Just put a lightning network enabled pay wall for for compute in front of it. And then again go back to mining. The mining industry has learned a lot about the energy sector and air is obviously going to be energy intensive too. And due to the nature of the need for 100% uptime of these GPU data centers in the artificial intelligence arena, I do think there's going to be co-location of Bitcoin eh6 that can participate in demand response and these GPU farms that are looking for low cost energy.  </p>
<p>01:12:03:24 - 01:12:27:14<br>Marty<br>And the only way to get that low cost energy is to participate in demand response and you need the Bitcoin miners for that. So I think a bunch of synergies and right now the to the X trophy and sphere and the Cypherpunk digital cash Bitcoin sphere are like a little bit disconnected, but you can see them sort of beginning to recognize, okay, maybe you ought to help each other out here.  </p>
<p>01:12:27:17 - 01:12:58:01<br>Aaron<br>Yeah. I mean, they're very they, they share a history not just in the extra open domain I mentioned, but you could argue even the very early history, like I mentioned, I start my book with sort of the emergence of the hacker culture. And that actually was at the lab of of MIT. So just when computers, you know, were first around, you got the the first experimentations and the first idea of creating it.  </p>
<p>01:12:58:03 - 01:13:25:00<br>Aaron<br>I was, you know, at the very beginning was like creating chess, computers and that kind of stuff. But it happened at the same place where, you know, like our culture emerged from there. Public key cryptography was invented. So, so it has a common ancestor and it's not a it's not surprising to see that they would find each other again now or in the future.  </p>
<p>01:13:25:02 - 01:13:46:07<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it's like they converge, diverge, reemerge, right. It's a beautiful thing and it's important to know the history, I guess is a good point. Circle pitch the book. Like why do you think people should understand the context of everything that came before Bitcoin?  </p>
<p>01:13:46:09 - 01:14:08:10<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, well, I mean, I am a historian technically, and the reason for that is that just in general, I believe if you want to understand why things are the way they are, if you want to understand why society is the way it is, why we have the institutions, we have it, it helps or to understand where it all came from.  </p>
<p>01:14:08:13 - 01:14:37:08<br>Aaron<br>And I think the same is true for Bitcoin. If you want to understand why Bitcoin is designed the way it is, why it was invented, it really helps. Or maybe it's even necessary to sort of understand where it came from. I mentioned that, you know, Bitcoin sort of consists of all these building blocks that kind of pre-dates Bitcoin and also the economic ideas that that are sort of embedded in Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:14:37:08 - 01:15:02:19<br>Aaron<br>Like it all predates Bitcoin and it was all brought together at some point. And I do think yeah I sort of had two goals with my book. You could say there's sort of two layers to it. One layer is if you already know a lot about Bitcoin, then it's hopefully, you know, interesting to learn where it all came from.  </p>
<p>01:15:02:22 - 01:15:20:29<br>Aaron<br>But also if you don't know a lot about Bitcoin, I hope that it's a good way to actually understand Bitcoin and the sort of this sort of step by step way where one step at a time, you know, public key cryptography is explain that work and then why these guys wanted to create this and where the economic ideas come from.  </p>
<p>01:15:20:29 - 01:15:28:03<br>Aaron<br>So it's a good way to understand Bitcoin itself. Well, I hope that that's the goal anyways. One of the goals.  </p>
<p>01:15:28:06 - 01:16:00:25<br>Marty<br>Now, well, we're going to learn from anybody in the space. I can speak from experience, having learned a ton throughout my time in Bitcoin from Aaron, you should go pick up the book because I completely agree to know where we are and where we may be. You have to understand where we came from and diving into the history of the Cypherpunk movement and all the iterations on digital cash that led to Bitcoin is extremely important, particularly if you're one of those individuals is new to Bitcoin out there, is convinced that it's the MySpace, that it's the first ever digital currency.  </p>
<p>01:16:00:25 - 01:16:06:06<br>Marty<br>It's wrong on its face. There was a lot of pre-history that led to.  </p>
<p>01:16:06:06 - 01:16:24:17<br>Aaron<br>Bitcoin, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. The Bitcoin is the first one that actually works. It's not the first one. It's the first one that got it right. You could say, Yeah. And I do think if you that becomes maybe more clear, if you read my book, I'm done selling my book, but.  </p>
<p>01:16:24:19 - 01:16:26:27<br>Marty<br>You're not done yet. Where can we find the book? That's the next.  </p>
<p>01:16:26:27 - 01:16:55:03<br>Aaron<br>Question. Oh, well, me first finish this point like, yeah, there's, that is a very common, you know, critique of Bitcoin that it's just a first of its kind and something better will come along and I do think that you know, if you read this prehistory then it's clear that no Bitcoin actually wasn't the first. There were other digital currency projects before it, including some that actually existed that some people used, you know, like MySpace actually existed and some people use it.  </p>
<p>01:16:55:06 - 01:17:12:15<br>Aaron<br>But Bitcoin is the first one that's actually succeeding that. That's that's one of the insights you could take away. Where can people find it? Well, it's on Amazon, It's on the Bitcoin magazine store. You can also go to Genesis book dot com and you'll find what you need there.  </p>
<p>01:17:12:15 - 01:17:19:22<br>Marty<br>Hopefully not only is it on Amazon, it's a bestseller on Amazon. I checked this.  </p>
<p>01:17:19:22 - 01:17:40:27<br>Aaron<br>Morning, it was for a brief moment in the Netherlands for like a day in the Netherlands. It was the number one bestselling book like on Amazon in the country that was a that was pretty ace. I didn't expect that like out of all books, not just subcategory, but just the bestselling book in the Netherlands, just for a day.  </p>
<p>01:17:40:27 - 01:17:43:03<br>Aaron<br>But still, that was pretty cool.  </p>
<p>01:17:43:06 - 01:17:47:10<br>Marty<br>We've got it. I'm going to take the screenshot, put the Logan number one new release.  </p>
<p>01:17:47:12 - 01:17:48:02<br>Aaron<br>Hmm. Hmm.  </p>
<p>01:17:48:04 - 01:17:54:23<br>Marty<br>According to my Amazon account here in the U.S., so it's still going to open just on the screen so people know what the.  </p>
<p>01:17:54:26 - 01:18:00:07<br>Aaron<br>That's probably in some cases, it must be in some category, right?  </p>
<p>01:18:00:10 - 01:18:05:21<br>Marty<br>Development and growth economics. That's a good that's a good.  </p>
<p>01:18:05:23 - 01:18:06:25<br>Aaron<br>I'll take it.  </p>
<p>01:18:06:28 - 01:18:10:22<br>Marty<br>That's a good one to be in.  </p>
<p>01:18:10:25 - 01:18:12:05<br>Aaron<br>The, uh.  </p>
<p>01:18:12:08 - 01:18:25:13<br>Marty<br>While this is uploading. Anything else I wouldn't touch on You think people should be aware of? Are you optimistic about where Bitcoin is and where it's going right now?  </p>
<p>01:18:25:16 - 01:18:47:22<br>Aaron<br>Yes. I mean, I think it's going pretty well. I would say I've been kind of zoned out of to sort of daily. Yeah. You know, during the Blocksize war, I was very involved with everything that was going every week. I was tuned in and I was in every chat group everywhere and sort of keeping a pulse on everything I could.  </p>
<p>01:18:47:22 - 01:19:06:22<br>Aaron<br>And it was during the writing of my book, I've sort of, you know, zoomed out a bit. So I'm not I'm not very involved in like the JPAC war or whatever the kids are fighting over these days. But in general, it seems to be doing pretty well to me. I Don't see anything wrong with you. What do you think?  </p>
<p>01:19:06:24 - 01:19:18:00<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I've been I mean, I've been keeping my pulse on the space for the the JPEG wars, as you, as you call them. I've been. Yeah. It seems like noise to me. It'll come and go.  </p>
<p>01:19:18:00 - 01:19:35:22<br>Aaron<br>I mean to me, like, isn't this what the Blocksize wars were kind of like. We have a blocksize limit so blocks can't be too big. And now if you want to stuff them with nonsense into, you got to pay for it. That's sort of the point of the block size limits for a large extent, so I'm not too worried about.  </p>
<p>01:19:35:22 - 01:19:53:09<br>Aaron<br>That's as far as I can tell. Bitcoin is still working, a block is still mined 10 minutes. There's now even ETFs. There's that the price is still pretty well I'm happy camper Marty.  </p>
<p>01:19:53:12 - 01:20:02:29<br>Marty<br>I am as well and I think maybe most importantly the outside world seems to be getting crazier and crazier. So that plays to our benefit as well.  </p>
<p>01:20:03:01 - 01:20:14:23<br>Aaron<br>Right? Bitcoin is still Bitcoin is sort of the central point of sanity in a in a in a crazy world it does feel like that sometimes to me. Anyways.  </p>
<p>01:20:14:25 - 01:20:24:22<br>Marty<br>That's the way I like to visualize bitcoin in my own mind. It's just this like beam of light in the center of a town that we can all access like anchor into and it's just always going to be beaming at the same.  </p>
<p>01:20:24:25 - 01:20:28:17<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, pretty much, Yes, exactly.  </p>
<p>01:20:28:19 - 01:20:32:06<br>Marty<br>Well, Aaron, I can't believe it took this long, but I'm happy.  </p>
<p>01:20:32:08 - 01:20:34:03<br>Aaron<br>Yeah, it was fun to finally be on.  </p>
<p>01:20:34:06 - 01:20:39:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah, we'll have to do it again if you're ever stateside. Let me now come to town.  </p>
<p>01:20:39:26 - 01:20:42:13<br>Aaron<br>Texas, with a person. Where are you, Austin?  </p>
<p>01:20:42:16 - 01:20:43:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:20:43:26 - 01:20:47:01<br>Aaron<br>I've never been to Austin, so I should. At some point, you've got.  </p>
<p>01:20:47:01 - 01:20:51:26<br>Marty<br>To count those people working on charm events right behind me. Literally. Nice. Behind this. Well.  </p>
<p>01:20:51:28 - 01:20:54:00<br>Aaron<br>Next time, I'm Darrell helping you.  </p>
<p>01:20:54:02 - 01:20:59:19<br>Marty<br>All right, you go enjoy your night. Thank you for thank you for doing this And keep crocheted.  </p>
<p>01:20:59:22 - 01:21:01:24<br>Aaron<br>Yes. Thanks for having me.  </p>
<p>01:21:01:26 - 01:21:03:08<br>Marty<br>Peace, love, freaks. Okay.</p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:image href="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/476-Aaron-van-Wirdum.png"/>
      </item>
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Bitcoin Is Eating The World | John Arnold]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[The conversation with John Arnold from Ten31 highlights the vast economic opportunity that bitcoin and its infrastructure present to the world. Bitcoin is expected to be adopted universally, and this adoption will drive demand for companies building applications and services around it.]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The conversation with John Arnold from Ten31 highlights the vast economic opportunity that bitcoin and its infrastructure present to the world. Bitcoin is expected to be adopted universally, and this adoption will drive demand for companies building applications and services around it.]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:23:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iobitcoin-is-eating-the-world-john-arnold/</link>
      <comments>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iobitcoin-is-eating-the-world-john-arnold/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qquxsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7cnfw33k76tw945hxtt9v96xjmn8946xsefdwahhymry944x76rw94shymn0d3jz7q3q9qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksxpqqqp65wt34p7d</guid>
      <category>TFTC Podcast</category>
      
        <media:content url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/475-John-Arnold.png" medium="image"/>
        <enclosure 
          url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/475-John-Arnold.png" length="0" 
          type="image/png" 
        />
      <noteId>naddr1qquxsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7cnfw33k76tw945hxtt9v96xjmn8946xsefdwahhymry944x76rw94shymn0d3jz7q3q9qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksxpqqqp65wt34p7d</noteId>
      <npub>npub19qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksn4zc3g</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrib]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/bitcoin-is-eating-the-world-john-arnold/">Read original post</a></p>
<h3><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h3>
<p>The conversation with John Arnold from <a href="https://ten31.vc/home?ref=tftc.io">Ten31</a> highlights the vast economic opportunity that bitcoin and its infrastructure present to the world. Bitcoin, being superior money, is expected to be adopted universally, and this adoption will drive demand for companies building applications and services around it. The discussion delves into the potential of bitcoin to disrupt various industries, from financial services to energy, and the role of venture capital in fostering this transformation. The key takeaways from this dialogue are:</p>
<ol>
<li>The bitcoin ecosystem is maturing rapidly, with more companies emerging to innovate and build upon its infrastructure.</li>
<li>Bitcoin's superior monetary properties, such as absolute scarcity, permissionless access, and global transferability, make it the best form of money and a catalyst for widespread economic change.</li>
<li>The total addressable market (TAM) for bitcoin-related companies is immense, potentially reaching or exceeding the size of the enterprise SaaS market.</li>
<li>Traditional industries, from payments to energy, will need to integrate bitcoin to remain competitive, leading to a broad spectrum of investment opportunities.</li>
<li>Specialization and focus in venture capital, as demonstrated by 1031, offer significant advantages in understanding and capturing the value within the bitcoin space.</li>
<li>The venture capital industry has been slow to recognize the potential of bitcoin due to distractions from other crypto assets and a lack of understanding of bitcoin's fundamental principles.</li>
</ol>
<h3><strong>Links</strong></h3>
<p>Follow John on <a href="https://twitter.com/JohnArnoldTen31?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>Check out <a href="https://ten31.vc/?ref=tftc.io">Ten31</a></p>
<p>Check out <em>Bitcoin is Eating the World:</em></p>
<p>[</p>
<p>Bitcoin Is Eating the World</p>
<p>An Investor’s Case for the Biggest TAM on Earth.</p>
<p><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/size/w256h256/2023/12/TFTC_02_Black-2--1-.png" alt="">TFTC – Truth for the CommonerJohn Arnold</p>
<p><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/size/w1200/2024/01/cyberpunk_cathedral.png" alt=""></p>
<p>](<np-embed url="https://tftc.io/bitcoin-is-eating-the-world/"><a href="https://tftc.io/bitcoin-is-eating-the-world/">https://tftc.io/bitcoin-is-eating-the-world/</a></np-embed>)</p>
<h3>Sponsors</h3>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h2><strong>Best Quotes</strong></h2>
<ol>
<li>"Bitcoin is superior money. And there is no way that any self-interested economic actor will be able to ignore indefinitely the consequences of what that means and will be able to indefinitely not adopt and use bitcoin in some way." – John Arnold</li>
<li>"Free markets are ruthless about excess margin and inefficiency. If there's a way to take costs out of the system, if there's a way to do something that serves end users better and that an entrepreneur can profit from doing, the market will do that." – John Arnold</li>
<li>"Every company will have to become a bitcoin company to survive." – John Arnold</li>
<li>"Focus is a highly powerful lever to driving investment returns, and that's a big part of what we do, focus." – John Arnold</li>
<li>"We're just getting started, and there's a lot of work to do." – John Arnold</li>
</ol>
<h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3>
<p>The conversation with John Arnold underscores the transformative potential of bitcoin and its underlying technology. As bitcoin continues to demonstrate its superiority as a form of money, its adoption is expected to reshape industries and create new economic opportunities. The venture capital space, particularly funds like Ten31, are poised to play a pivotal role in nurturing the growth of bitcoin-focused companies. Through specialization and a deep understanding of bitcoin's attributes, these funds are well-positioned to capitalize on the burgeoning market. The future of bitcoin is not only promising for investors and companies within the ecosystem but also for the broader economy as it embraces a more efficient, secure, and decentralized monetary system.</p>
<h3>Timestamps</h3>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>7:06 - The real John Arnold<br>10:26 - John’s background<br>23:10 - Total addressable market<br>29:31 - Tech stock returns<br>34:42 - Best time to jump in<br>44:04 - Why Bitcoin is eating the world<br>52:01 - Financial services<br>1:03:06 - Consumer applications<br>1:09:06 - Replacing the incumbent system<br>1:21:48 - Venture capital not recognizing<br>1:29:57 - Ten31 network<br>1:35:07 - Bitcoin is fun<br>1:40:45 - Wrapping up</p>
<h3>Transcript</h3>
<p>00:00:02:16 - 00:00:05:03<br>Marty<br>John Arnold.  </p>
<p>00:00:05:05 - 00:00:07:22<br>John<br>Mary Beth. It's an honor.  </p>
<p>00:00:07:24 - 00:00:12:25<br>Marty<br>It's a long time coming, sir. Working together for, what, two years now?  </p>
<p>00:00:12:25 - 00:00:16:12<br>John<br>Almost close to two years. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:00:16:15 - 00:00:25:04<br>Marty<br>We're very lucky to have you on our team at 1031. I just want to say that up front, I.  </p>
<p>00:00:25:06 - 00:00:33:19<br>John<br>The feeling is mutual. Very, very bullish on what we're doing. I think it's very unique and we're just getting started. So I'm excited.  </p>
<p>00:00:33:21 - 00:00:51:11<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Before we jump into what we're here to talk about, which is the fact that Bitcoin is eating the world. You wrote an incredible piece laying out the case for Bitcoin being the largest total addressable market on the planet. But before we do that, are you the real John? John Arnold? That's the question I think we need to.  </p>
<p>00:00:51:13 - 00:01:19:02<br>John<br>My parents. My parents would say yes, but there is a slightly more famous and just slightly wealthier John Arnold out there who happens to be a billionaire. And I guess this quick background on me, I am a traditional finance refugee, starting an investment banking around a college, then went to work at the hedge fund Citadel for several years.  </p>
<p>00:01:19:02 - 00:01:44:15<br>John<br>And while I was there, I got an email from another another billionaire by the name of Ken Griffin asking to to talk to me right away. And obviously assumed, as we're all trained, to assume that that's, you know, some kind of spams in a phishing attempt. But when I referred it to our I.T. department, I was assured know it's the real Ken Griffin and you better give him a call.  </p>
<p>00:01:44:17 - 00:02:22:19<br>John<br>So I gave him a ring, and I believe he was trying to get my opinion on some gala or charity event. And I was unfortunately unable to provide any useful information to him and hung up the phone, assuming surely I'm about to be fired, checked in with his secretary to find out that he was actually looking for the John Arnold the the real one, the billionaire with whom he presumably has some kind of relationship and not the underlying John Arnold, who was, you know, a first year analyst at his firm.  </p>
<p>00:02:22:22 - 00:02:28:27<br>John<br>So that's my claim to fame at this point as being the the second John Arnold in the world.  </p>
<p>00:02:29:00 - 00:02:37:07<br>Marty<br>Well, the second John Arnold. But for a secondary like oh, Ken, Ken's like in my my work as an analyst, my pressing him.  </p>
<p>00:02:37:09 - 00:02:58:02<br>John<br>You know, generally when you're like 23, 24 and the billionaire CEO of your company wants to talk to you, it typically isn't a good thing. So my first my my first response was not positive, but turned out to be turned out to just be a mistake, an innocent mistake. So we live to fight another day.  </p>
<p>00:02:58:05 - 00:03:20:19<br>Marty<br>Yeah, that's one of the funnier stories that you have in your belt. You have a few of them. That's one of my favorites, but it's a good level setting for the context of this conversation. Obviously, you're with us at 1031. You've come full throttle into the Bitcoin ecosystem, helping back the companies that are building out the infrastructure for Bitcoin standard.  </p>
<p>00:03:20:19 - 00:03:32:24<br>Marty<br>Before we jump into the article and all that. Let's talk a little bit more about your background, what you're doing at Citadel, what you're doing before that, what you were focused on and how that applies to what you're doing now. 1031.  </p>
<p>00:03:32:26 - 00:04:02:26<br>John<br>Yeah, for sure. Post-college, like I said, I started in investment banking at Goldman. For those that don't know, that's a lot of Excel modeling, building PowerPoint decks, turning comments from, you know, senior members of your team at 4 a.m. and just trying to survive and learn, you know, the basics of kind of corporate finance. I knew I wanted to be an investor likely in the public markets.  </p>
<p>00:04:02:26 - 00:04:40:00<br>John<br>And so recruited for positions at hedge funds landed at Citadel, which had me doing a lot of investment analysis publicly traded companies. I was on health care desks focused even more specifically on medical technology and the model of a lot of those modern kind of hedge fund businesses. The big shots is to have kind of an army of people who are inch wide, mile deep, focused on very particular subsectors and trying to be the acts in those subsectors and just kind of know them better than anyone else in the market.  </p>
<p>00:04:40:03 - 00:05:05:18<br>John<br>That'll be relevant to kind of the story of what we're doing at 1031 in a second. But I did that kind of was a junior analyst working out to some extent, worked on a couple of different desks, always focused on medical technology, providing a lot of the underlying analysis for investment decisions that our desk would make for positions usually on very lean teams.  </p>
<p>00:05:05:18 - 00:05:35:16<br>John<br>So only a few people typically worked for kind of just one person above me, providing input, analytical inputs, meeting with management teams, doing channel checks and just kind of learning as much as I could about the companies in our portfolio. And so kind of built up what I think is a pretty strong muscle on just basic blocking and tackling of corporate finance and investment analysis in a public markets context.  </p>
<p>00:05:35:19 - 00:06:11:16<br>John<br>But I had always been kind of a big supporter of Austrian economics, even from high school onward. You know, you've you've talked at length. You just had the episode of Parker Lewis out about how you guys were kind of both formed by the financial crisis in a way. I was also kind of in high school at the time, right around the same age as you, and that caught my attention and made me interested in finance in a big way for the first time, but also interested in kind of what the causes of that debt crisis were and why suddenly all the smartest guys in the room seemed to not know what was going on and  </p>
<p>00:06:11:16 - 00:06:44:16<br>John<br>why we needed to take out untold levels of debt and print untold levels of money on hold for that time to bail out the system. And so that naturally led me down. The Federal Reserve rabbit hole and into kind of Austrian economics and the thesis Institute and, you know, became a big Ron Paul supporter. And so I always kind of had that vein running through kind of my intellectual life here while I was working in finance jobs.  </p>
<p>00:06:44:19 - 00:07:11:24<br>John<br>Obviously, as you would imagine, a lot of those principles are not you know, they're not orthodoxy on your your traditional finance desks typically. So didn't necessarily have a lot of opportunity to put those into practice. But, you know, over time, kind of working in those jobs, you sense like especially if you come to those jobs with the priors of Austrian economics, you can kind of sense that there there's something a little wrong, at least to say the least.  </p>
<p>00:07:11:26 - 00:07:56:00<br>John<br>There are kind of strange like short term games being played and there's kind of less and less focus on fundamental analysis and attention, less and less attention paid to what's a fundamentally justifiable valuation for a company. A lot more focus on just short termism, quarterly earnings reports or even, you know, weekly monthly moves in a stock position, focus on others positioning and kind of just increasingly trading all stocks, as you know, more or less like shit coins, just like tickers on a screen that have maybe some tenuous link to real economic realities, but like, not really that you only have that you have to like, pay attention to.  </p>
<p>00:07:56:03 - 00:08:22:05<br>John<br>So I kind of went through that career progression with those priors in mind, and you would think that that would have led me to fully grok Bitcoin much sooner. But I heard about it for the first time in 2013 in college. I think around the time that Malcolm X blew up, I knew it was kind of a it was popular among libertarians, but it seemed, you know, esoteric and scammy.  </p>
<p>00:08:22:05 - 00:08:48:08<br>John<br>And I thought my science project got probably never going to work. Then I my next touchpoint was while I was working in finance in the 2017 Bull run, got a little more interested then, but still just didn't have the conviction to fully take the plunge. And you know, obviously you're drinking from a firehose on finance desks and you have a lot of time to to drill into something that takes 100 plus hours of work to to start to get.  </p>
<p>00:08:48:08 - 00:09:19:13<br>John<br>So that didn't work either. But finally, you know, spring 2020 happened and that forced me down the rabbit hole. And after a week or two of some real diligent work, it finally clicked that this was indeed the fulfillment of the principles that I had learned from economics. This was Hayek's sly roundabout way to change the system, the monetary system for the better, in a totally peaceful, voluntary way.  </p>
<p>00:09:19:15 - 00:09:40:06<br>John<br>And so from then on I was hooked. I continue to work my hedge fund jobs for, you know, other year plus just kind of learning as much as I could about Bitcoin being in the space as much as I could, you know, much too much of my wife's chagrin, as I'm sure a lot of you know, Bitcoiners can can attest, it becomes kind of the only thing you can talk about or think about.  </p>
<p>00:09:40:06 - 00:10:22:13<br>John<br>So I went through that period, but to your point about coming from investing background around summer 2021, so after being in Bitcoin for a little over a year, kind of just started to have the intuition that if Bitcoin was going to do what I thought it was going to do and what most of people listening to this probably think it's going to do, there will be a massive kind of wave of demand behind that for companies building applications to make Bitcoin easier to use to extend its utility to both those retail users and enterprises.  </p>
<p>00:10:22:15 - 00:10:43:24<br>John<br>And because Bitcoin is money, then there's no industry that it's not going to touch and we'll get into that more. But that by itself was kind of this intuition that made me start thinking about investing in Bitcoin companies and trying to figure out a way to do that. And right around that time, 1031 popped under my radar, kind of came out of stealth.  </p>
<p>00:10:43:26 - 00:11:19:23<br>John<br>And, you know, I saw that very honest, combining traditional finance experience, you know, some of the two co-founders have experience in private equity and hedge funds. And then they were bringing, you know, you and Matt O'Dell on and, you know, you guys were formative in my orange building experience, my going down the rabbit hole. And so it just seemed like the perfect kind of shop to go try to build and stud a totally unique opportunity combining the two things you would need to be a successful investor, right?  </p>
<p>00:11:19:23 - 00:11:52:11<br>John<br>In the Bitcoin space, which is some traditional finance investing experience and deep, deep Bitcoin knowledge in Bitcoin focus. So I think I slid into Grant's DMS, you know, in like summer or fall 21 and just kind of wouldn't let up until we got on the phone. He and I started talking and I started doing some work with you guys when it, when I had a chance on the side and one thing led to another and yeah, spring of 22, I think the day that Terra Luna blew up at full time.  </p>
<p>00:11:52:14 - 00:11:53:27<br>Marty<br>Baptism by fire, maybe.  </p>
<p>00:11:54:04 - 00:12:21:02<br>John<br>Yeah, exactly. Exactly. But it was validating, too, right? I mean, it's exactly the kind of thing where, you know, a couple of years before I'd been looking at all the investment in the crypto space broadly and thinking these things look like perpetual motion machines. You know, it's there's a ton of noise. Everyone's missing the signal of remaking money of kind of digital buried value that's absolutely scarce.  </p>
<p>00:12:21:04 - 00:12:46:05<br>John<br>And, you know, that was one of the things that pulled me to 1031 with, you know, the concern and viewpoint that you guys were taking. And so I think it was appropriate that basically the day that I joined, we were kind of like vindicated in a very big way. You know, unfortunately, when one of the probably the perpetual motion machine of crypto par excellence totally blew up par excellence.  </p>
<p>00:12:46:07 - 00:13:14:21<br>Marty<br>That's again, four level setting for this conversation. It's so true. I mean, I had a very short stint in traditional finance about three years, which included two years of college, whereas working full time and taking night classes. But it was different side of traditional finance with Men's Futures Fund, your fund of funds index, commodity trading advisors. So it wasn't like a long short equity portfolio where we're diving into individual companies and looking at valuations and trying to place bets that way.  </p>
<p>00:13:14:21 - 00:13:40:04<br>Marty<br>It was more of a macro theme looking at commodities markets, and I had similar experience where I would sit there with the chief investment officers of these large commodity trading advisors, and this was in 2012, 2013, right around when Janet Yellen was taking over the helm and we were coming out of QE twist and into QE two. And I was simply asking them, like, you guys worried about all this monetary base expansion.  </p>
<p>00:13:40:04 - 00:14:12:15<br>Marty<br>They're like, No, the Fed doesn't really control markets. And I think the amount of complacency that I witness at a young age at that level of high finance, if you will, for lack of a better term, was was eye opening for me. It was like, oh, all the quote unquote, smartest people in the room really don't care about something, which I'm pretty sure we'll have an immense impact on global markets everywhere, whether it's equity, equities or commodities and other financial assets like treasuries.  </p>
<p>00:14:12:18 - 00:14:35:11<br>Marty<br>And that was really radicalizing for me in a way where I was like, wow, these nobody knows what's going on. And that's same time falling down the Bitcoin rabbit hole and really realizing, Oh, this is solution to solve all this insanity in the world, all this mispricing, we need to fix the pricing mechanism, which is the money. And that dovetails into what we're going to talk about.  </p>
<p>00:14:35:15 - 00:15:07:16<br>Marty<br>I would argue that over the last 15 years, six years now post 2008, the ability to actually go in and properly value companies has been completely distorted. Look at a p e ratio of some companies like NVIDIA above 200, which is insane. Obviously the amount of monetary base expansion and debt expansion has flown into financial assets and yes, and P at all time highs or it hit all time highs in the last week.  </p>
<p>00:15:07:16 - 00:15:27:22<br>Marty<br>I'm not sure where it is today and and check yesterday and people view that as the stock market being a barometer of the economy like oh everything's well and good but if you look at the dislocation that exist out there in terms of the quality of life that individuals have and the amount of economic pressure that your average Joe is feeling right now just does not compute with what's going on.  </p>
<p>00:15:27:22 - 00:15:57:14<br>Marty<br>So there's a dislocation. Bitcoin, hopefully some money standard will get us back to a proper pricing mechanism that will allow us to then go allocate capital efficiently and properly to to do productive things, to increase the quality of life of everybody. And then what we're doing is sort of a layer above that, like we're going to fix the money, then to do that, we have to build out infrastructure that gives people access to that money and provides them utility to do things with that money.  </p>
<p>00:15:57:14 - 00:16:22:13<br>Marty<br>So that's what we're trying to do at 1031, investing in in private company is building out this infrastructure. But before we dive into the nitty gritty of what we're doing, I think it would be a good place, a good place to start would be to just dive into the heuristic of total addressable market versus other heuristics, which you you up in the piece with these frameworks that investors use to sort of make their decisions.  </p>
<p>00:16:22:13 - 00:16:32:16<br>Marty<br>It could be value based, could be team based. But the one that unites all that you put in the piece is total addressable market. What is the opportunity we have to get a return on our capital?  </p>
<p>00:16:32:19 - 00:16:58:21<br>John<br>Yeah, absolutely. And I would say the various kind of pure risks that investors use to private investments are not mutually exclusive, right? So probably you should be evaluating a variety of things, including, you know, you have to even a great investment can actually you know a great company can't be a great investment if it's like very poorly priced.  </p>
<p>00:16:58:21 - 00:17:23:12<br>John<br>Right. So if you get in at a level that is dramatically overextended relative to kind of the free cash flow that the company can actually generate over a reasonable holding period, then even if they are indeed like a good team in a good market with a good product and, you know, competitive moats, etc., you know, the pricing of the investment can completely throw your returns out of whack.  </p>
<p>00:17:23:12 - 00:17:54:08<br>John<br>Right? So valuation is important and it's one of the things that I saw not really being kind of respected during my time at Rural Finance. So that's an important heuristic that I think will return to more and more as Bitcoin hopefully kind of resets our monetary framework. And you know, there are various other kind of ways that you can shop up and look at whether a company is an attractive investment and you should do all those different things.  </p>
<p>00:17:54:10 - 00:18:41:17<br>John<br>But the point that I make in the beginning of the piece, as you point out, is pretty much every investor kind of regardless of whether they're just trying to buy, you know, the cheapest things possible and hope that they can kind of get a pop in a relatively short time, just as valuations. Correct. Or whether they're hyper focused on growth and in the most cutting edge technology that they can find or, you know, anything else everyone needs to and has to inevitably pay attention to TAM, as you say, total addressable market, because for a given probability of success of the investment and for a given quality of a team and for a given level of  </p>
<p>00:18:41:17 - 00:19:06:01<br>John<br>scalability of a company using unit economics, the huge lever that will differentiate between all of those pulling them all kind of equal is just how big is the prize that they're actually targeting, right? You can think of it on one extreme, one extreme end of, you know, a local kind of, you know, contractor doing work around like his hometown.  </p>
<p>00:19:06:03 - 00:19:36:08<br>John<br>That may be like an absolutely great business. And probably we need like a lot more of those. We need more skilled tradespeople and electricians than we have in this country for reasons that you talk about in other episodes of this podcast. But there's naturally kind of a ceiling on how much revenue that business is going to generate and thus also, you know, how much cash flow it can it can generate, which is ultimately what you have to care about when making an assessment on whether you're going to make an investment or not.  </p>
<p>00:19:36:10 - 00:20:08:07<br>John<br>And so as you ramp up the the addressable market, the shots on goal, the the size of the customer base that a company is selling into you, you've lever up and you ratchet up the impact of the team and the impact of scalability and you know, the impact of the profitability for a given business with a 20% profit margin that can max out at, you know, $1,000,000 of revenue right?  </p>
<p>00:20:08:10 - 00:20:30:27<br>John<br>Okay. Well, you get $200,000 of profit off that. If you can scale those same economics with that same team to, you know, $100 Billion market, just by having just by addressing a bigger opportunity, you've already you've dramatically levered up and scaled up the price that you can pay for the investment to make sense and the amount of free cash flow that it can generate.  </p>
<p>00:20:30:29 - 00:20:51:14<br>John<br>And so as I point out in the piece, like TAM is not the only thing that matters by any means. And in fact, certainly there are kind of more traditional VC early stage investors that have gotten way too focused on kind of like pie in the sky tam numbers and said, I can pay pretty much any multiple that that I want.  </p>
<p>00:20:51:14 - 00:21:10:06<br>John<br>I can I don't have to care about, you know, time to revenue generation or time to profitability because it's just this company is addressing $1,000,000,000,000 market, $100 trillion market. And so you can throw out these wild numbers and even at a very low probability of success, you can convince yourself that, you know, something is maybe a great investment.  </p>
<p>00:21:10:14 - 00:21:38:07<br>John<br>So that's not the way that we need to go. And again, I think as capital gets more expensive, as easy money goes away, that kind of thinking will go away. But there's still significant value as you differentiate between investments in looking at how big is the actual opportunity set, because that's going to, at the end of the day, you know, to bring it back to kind of like, you know, Boomer Warren Buffett language like your margin of safety goes up.  </p>
<p>00:21:38:10 - 00:22:02:16<br>John<br>Yes. You're addressing a much, much bigger market than someone else. You just have more shots on goal to drive revenue, more potential customers and a bigger total pie that you can sell into and maybe, you know, take share up. Right. You know, would you rather have 10% of $1,000,000,000,000 market or, you know, 50% of $100 million market rate?  </p>
<p>00:22:02:19 - 00:22:27:06<br>John<br>So the just gaming that ratio in your favor by addressing the biggest markets possible is, I think, a major lever of investment success that pretty much any investor, regardless of kind of their stripe and what they focus on in terms of methodology, needs to pay attention to. And you know what every investor out there who's paying cash, Pashtu.  </p>
<p>00:22:27:09 - 00:22:56:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah, in this piece Bitcoin is even the world was obviously a play on software. Is he in the world? I mean you mentioned explicitly in the piece by Marc Andreessen from A16z Anderson Horowitz. And I think to set the context for the Bitcoin conversation and it is important to go back and look at the last wave of innovation that led to insane returns for investors, which is obviously the transition to digital age and the companies that really capitalized on that.  </p>
<p>00:22:56:29 - 00:23:11:04<br>Marty<br>So you have a great chart here of the investment returns of the core for Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, juxtapose the S&amp;P gold in long bonds over a 20 year time horizon. And it is pretty insane when you look at it.  </p>
<p>00:23:11:06 - 00:23:31:29<br>John<br>Yeah, absolutely. I mean, this is you know, I kind of acknowledge in the piece like this is not going to be surprising to anyone who looks at it. I think if you've been paying even the slightest amount of attention to if you have, you know, a retirement account, if you have any kind of like portfolio and, you know, increasingly, you know, no one has been able to really save and just in dollars in a bank account.  </p>
<p>00:23:32:02 - 00:24:05:02<br>John<br>So we've all had to kind of pay more attention to this right over the last ten, 20, 30 years. I think everyone intuitively knows this is the case, right, That FAANG stocks broadly, these massive tech leaders, what are now being called like the Magnificent Seven, are really holding up a lot of a lot of the S&amp;P and are explaining a lot of, you know, overall stock market returns because and part of that is because of, you know, monetary base expansion, that it's kind of deleterious consequences and forcing people to apply more premium to them.  </p>
<p>00:24:05:09 - 00:24:44:21<br>John<br>But there's also there's also real dramatic economic value that's been generated by the right like there's a reason that these companies are in the position that they're in. It's because one of the main reasons is because they were leading infrastructure providers at the forefront of a radical secular shift in the way that commerce operates. Right. The materialization of communication and information storage and transfer through Internet enabled software was, you know, the highest leverage are among the highest leverage innovations and inventions in human history.  </p>
<p>00:24:44:29 - 00:25:18:25<br>John<br>And people obviously needed tools and applications and services to fully avail themselves of the benefit of that. Right. And so the companies that you see on that chart, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon and several others that we can think of, one by positioning themselves as market leaders, providing those services. And, you know, obviously the the path to get here is is is strewn with, you know, some corpses of companies that were once their competitors that that didn't quite make it.  </p>
<p>00:25:18:25 - 00:25:49:11<br>John<br>And some of those companies just got bought by the few companies that you see on that chart. But nevertheless there was very clearly tremendous value generated even before the crazy kind of multiple expansion of the last 5 to 10 years by the bellwether companies that enabled mass, both retail and enterprise use the primitives of the Internet protocol stack and of, you know, consumer software, right.  </p>
<p>00:25:49:14 - 00:26:16:17<br>John<br>And so, you know, Andriessen, as you referenced, wrote his piece in 2011, software is eating the world to kind of encapsulate that point, that exact point, that this is a massive secular shift. And the companies that were driving it were set to even in 2011, there were still a lot of low hanging fruit to be collected. The companies that were picking that low hanging fruit were set to drive massive returns for investors.  </p>
<p>00:26:16:19 - 00:26:41:06<br>John<br>And that did right. The difference, I would say, with his piece versus kind of where we are right now with Bitcoin is in 2011, right like the iPhone had been around for years. Android followed shortly after Facebook had been around, I think seven years. I think hundreds of millions of users. At that point, Netflix was already doing streaming and that was clearly picking up steam.  </p>
<p>00:26:41:08 - 00:27:05:27<br>John<br>Amazon had like pretty much already already, you know, signed the death warrant for, you know, physical bookstores and a lot of physical retail. So he wasn't really saying anything like highly controversial. Yeah, maybe like, you know, capital allocators weren't fully paying attention and maybe they were still somewhat underweight tech. But in reality, like your grandma was already on Facebook in 2011, right?  </p>
<p>00:27:05:27 - 00:27:27:12<br>John<br>Like it was becoming a fairly consensus viewpoint, but we're said it where we're seeing that Bitcoin today is, you know, we're 15 years ahead, probably 15, 20 years ahead of where Andriessen was when that piece was written. The theme is just as powerful and I would argue even more powerful, but it is far less consensus at this point.  </p>
<p>00:27:27:15 - 00:27:37:22<br>John<br>And that means that the asymmetric upside is orders of magnitude greater. So that's a reason to be excited, I think, about what we're doing.  </p>
<p>00:27:37:24 - 00:28:05:09<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I mean, when you were going through that, the the fact that the competitors came, when it went throughout time in the tech sector, I couldn't help but think I always thought that Jeeves was going to is going to make it and compete with with Google. But I guess I mean I completely agree we're much earlier in Bitcoin's lifecycle compared to when Andriessen wrote his piece in 2011 where the tech cycle was then.  </p>
<p>00:28:05:12 - 00:28:11:08<br>Marty<br>And I guess that gets into the question of timing. Can you be too early in this?  </p>
<p>00:28:11:11 - 00:28:35:21<br>John<br>Yeah, I mean, that's that's a key like lesson to learn in investing is that, you know, being being early is tantamount to being wrong. So there are definitely situations where in my own career I've been kind of right on the investment thesis over like a 12 to 24 month period, but you very wrong in like a three month period.  </p>
<p>00:28:35:23 - 00:28:56:01<br>John<br>It's a timing is very important. What I would say though is I think what we discovered over the couple of years, I guess four years now since the drone was launched, a couple of years since I joined is, you know, we people always say in Bitcoin that, you know, the the best time to buy Bitcoin was yesterday. The second best time is today.  </p>
<p>00:28:56:03 - 00:29:21:02<br>John<br>I actually think the flipside is true for bitcoin infrastructure. You know a few years ago even Bitcoin still had not gone through as many stress tests as it has today. Lightning was still, you know, even more immature than it is today. And certainly I think it's still quite early for lightning, but there were very few companies even really building on it at scale.  </p>
<p>00:29:21:04 - 00:29:52:06<br>John<br>And we multisig was still fairly new, Unchained was still having to really beat the drum on just even using collaborative custody at all. Now you can see like some real indications that those things have shifted significantly. We've had a lot more stress tests since, you know, five or six years ago. Blocksize wars tax, the China mining ban and a variety of other things.  </p>
<p>00:29:52:06 - 00:30:17:14<br>John<br>You know, yet another 80% plus price drawdown. I think that's for now in Bitcoin's history, maybe 35. And so we're at a point now where there's a greater degree of maturity in the ecosystem, in the builders, in the ecosystem. And in just the last couple of years, we can say, you know, anecdotally and I think we might have actually put out some data on this in a prior piece that we wrote.  </p>
<p>00:30:17:14 - 00:30:49:01<br>John<br>But the number of companies coming to market with really interesting solutions is inflecting. I don't have the numbers off top of my head, but there have been far more Bitcoin deal, Bitcoin only deals done in the last few years, even amidst kind of the carnage of the VC, carnage of 22 and 23 than the last couple of years probably, you know, combined the deals that we've that we've seen in the market overall that vastly outstrips the total deals done in the ten years prior.  </p>
<p>00:30:49:01 - 00:31:25:28<br>John<br>Right. So I think we're entering the stage where the technology stack the ecosystem, the companies and the quality of companies are mature enough and have progressed to the point where you would have been to early like five years ago probably. I don't think we're too early anymore. I think we're at exactly the right time to lean into this thesis, especially heading into a period of the next famine coming up, and 11 major criminal finance institutions now having put their imprimatur on Bitcoin being an investable asset for institutions.  </p>
<p>00:31:26:01 - 00:31:46:00<br>John<br>You and I might not care about that that much. And I know I will not be owning the ETFs and I highly recommend everyone listening to this choose a collaborative custody option like what Unchained offers or, you know, another option like that where you can actually own real underlying Bitcoin while also not having to take on the complexity of key management.  </p>
<p>00:31:46:07 - 00:32:05:26<br>John<br>But that said, it's still very meaningful that the biggest asset manager in the world has now filed for this ETF. And Larry Fink, the head of that asset manager, has changed his tune in just a few years time from Bitcoin is a tool for criminals, is an index of money laundering. It has no intrinsic value it makes no sense to.  </p>
<p>00:32:05:27 - 00:32:30:28<br>John<br>It's a tool. It protects you. It's it's there in case your your government tries to censor you or it's there to protect you against monetary debasement. You know, suddenly he sounds like, you know, Ron Paul like ten or 15 years ago. Right. He's kind of parroting those same lines. And I don't I think we shouldn't understate what that means for institutional awareness of and acceptance of an adoption of Bitcoin and what it will mean over the next 5 to 10 years.  </p>
<p>00:32:30:28 - 00:32:54:13<br>John<br>And so I look at all that and I say, okay, no, we are not too early. Like this is just the right time where the asymmetry is still there, the alpha is still there, people still don't fully get why Bitcoin is differentiated and why these opportunities are exciting, but they're starting to wake up. The ecosystem is significantly more mature than it was even just a few years ago.  </p>
<p>00:32:54:20 - 00:33:05:04<br>John<br>And so we're at a really good kind of balancing point where we're not too early, we're not too late. And I think it's exactly the right time to be leaning into investing in these companies.  </p>
<p>00:33:05:06 - 00:33:36:29<br>Marty<br>I completely agree. Having been around Bitcoin for ten years, the maturity of the space over the last five years particularly has been amazing to see. And you couple that with the macroeconomic tailwinds that are coming our way, not only is the fiscal situation here in the United States utterly dire, it seems that the banking crisis that we experienced last year is probably just a Band-Aid over and lurking right under the surface, ready to pop up at any time.  </p>
<p>00:33:36:29 - 00:34:04:03<br>Marty<br>And then you have the culmination of geopolitical events that have happened over the last few years where the U.S. has weaponized the dollar system, seized Treasury assets, and you have other large players in the geopolitical realm beginning to form alliances that that seem like they could attempt to erode the sanctity of the U.S. dollar as a global reserve asset.  </p>
<p>00:34:04:03 - 00:34:28:10<br>Marty<br>And you mentioned the ETFs getting approved. And I think another thing socially, I mentioned earlier, like people really feeling the pressures of inflation in their everyday lives is beginning to stoke that that question in the common man's mind, like why is this happening? Why can't I live a higher quality of life like I was just able to five, six years ago.  </p>
<p>00:34:28:13 - 00:35:03:02<br>Marty<br>And naturally that that question will will lead them to the solution which is Bitcoin. And once they come to understand it, which I think that's another part of the thesis here, is that think as it stands today in 2024, there's never been more of a wealth of a knowledge base built out for people to easily learn what Bitcoin is, why it's important, and you have different educational materials for the different types of archetypes of people in the way in which they learn.  </p>
<p>00:35:03:08 - 00:35:45:09<br>Marty<br>So I think timing is perfect. We've got another having coming up. We were just in Nashville last week and I think that is I mean, obviously I've been hyper focused on mining for the last six years, but I do think that is one of the first big dominoes to falls once the energy sector really notices and leans into the benefits that Bitcoin mining as a an alternative revenue stream, a grid balancer, or in a way to be more efficient with your your stranded assets once that light bulb goes off in the energy sector and they lean in heavy, I think that's a massive domino that begins to spread and make it obvious that Bitcoin is  </p>
<p>00:35:45:09 - 00:36:11:06<br>Marty<br>here to stay. It's it's a net benefit for humanity and there's going to be a lot of activity. Companies spun up people saving in Bitcoin. It's going to get really cool. And I think I've never been more excited. It is daunting. Ten years, many cycles, as you can see on my face. And look, I'm only 32. I probably look like I'm 42.  </p>
<p>00:36:11:08 - 00:36:13:02<br>Marty<br>I've seen a lot, but.  </p>
<p>00:36:13:05 - 00:36:15:03<br>John<br>I would I wouldn't have put you into over 28.  </p>
<p>00:36:15:05 - 00:36:42:11<br>Marty<br>Oh, thank you. Thank you. Um, but not the timing feels feels good. And I think the fact that that Bitcoin has survived these waves and it just really reinforced the value prop of the network, the peer to peer distributed cash system, the hard supply, and the fact that hashrate has gotten to the level that it is and been distributed geographically as it has over time, I think it's you.  </p>
<p>00:36:42:12 - 00:36:58:19<br>Marty<br>You'd be an idiot not to recognize that there's something here. But the fallback to sort of the the underlining first principles of why this is important like wise Bitcoin eating the world like in your mind.  </p>
<p>00:36:58:22 - 00:37:37:27<br>John<br>Yeah, for sure. The the simplest answer is bitcoin is superior money and there is no way that any self-interested economic actor will be able to ignore indefinitely the consequences of what that means and will not be, and will be able to indefinitely not adopt and use Bitcoin in some way. The I go through kind of the properties that make Bitcoin secure money in the piece and like a little table, it's probably something that, you know, if you've been in this space for a little while and you've seen a version of it, if you're newer to the conversation, you know, we can walk through it together.  </p>
<p>00:37:37:27 - 00:38:00:03<br>John<br>It is right there. I highly recommend just kind of taking a second to step through it, informed by people who have been in the space for a while, as well as just offering economics and kind of principles there. But these various properties kind of lead you to the inevitable conclusion that Bitcoin is the best money we've ever had.  </p>
<p>00:38:00:05 - 00:38:24:27<br>John<br>And as 1031 advisor Parker Lewis famously, at least famously, for those who are in the Bitcoin space, wrote in the piece on Bitcoin obsolete all our other money. Money converges to one, right? You don't want to hold ten monies where your money A is like your best one. We also hold some of money which isn't quite as good and it doesn't hold value as well.  </p>
<p>00:38:24:27 - 00:38:45:12<br>John<br>And it's not as liquid and salable, but still okay. And when we see etc. like no, you will always trade the inferior monies. You always tend to trade the inferior monies as much as possible for the superior money. Even in the world that we live in today, you can look around and say, well, every sovereign nation has, you know, just about every sovereign nation has its own currency.  </p>
<p>00:38:45:14 - 00:39:06:02<br>John<br>And we're kind of in this world that topical, you know, partial barter between these currencies, which is like reintroduce the double coincidence of once the problem money was introduced to solve. And so you could say, well, you know, we haven't converged to one, you know, in the last 50 years since the start of the Fiat regime, like is it really true that one, convert it to one?  </p>
<p>00:39:06:09 - 00:39:44:22<br>John<br>But the reality is that the world settlement asset is the dollar, right? You can have, you know, these little fiefdoms that have their own currencies that they've made up that they kind of manage. But at the end of the day, the dollar has the dominant network effect. And if given the choice and you see it around the world right now with the emerging stablecoins, especially people right now want dollars thanks to the petrodollar system which you've talked about on this podcast, a good amount and we have reason to believe is is crumbling partially for the reasons that you pointed out, which is that the US has really shown in the last few years that it  </p>
<p>00:39:44:22 - 00:40:04:15<br>John<br>will debase and seize your dollar denominated assets and your U.S. Treasuries at will if it if it wants to. And that's just one of the reasons that that system is kind of crumbling. But for now, the dollar is the big dog. There are not ten big dogs. There are not ten major kind of reserve assets for the world that people want.  </p>
<p>00:40:04:15 - 00:40:33:22<br>John<br>Above all else. There's one and it's a dollar. Our thesis is that that will inevitably change over who knows what the time frame is ten years, 20 or 50 years. But it will shift to being Bitcoin for the reasons that we outlined this piece about Bitcoin spare monetary properties. Bitcoin is absolutely scarce, so it will be the best store of value over time.  </p>
<p>00:40:33:25 - 00:41:07:21<br>John<br>That's enforced by a decentralized consensus of self-interested actors that cannot be easily gamed. It's permissionless to interact with its digitally native barer value that can be sent globally 24 seven very, very difficult, if not impossible to censor, at least for any meaningful amount of time. And capital controls are not effective against it. And so everyone, as knowledge distributes, every person on the earth will want to increasingly get more Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:41:07:24 - 00:41:33:23<br>John<br>We've seen that in history with kind of the emergence of gold as the global reserve asset up until the point at which gold no longer scale for global commerce. It naturally, spontaneously evolved as the world reserve asset and sell an asset across a bunch of different highly diverse societies around the world and at different points in history because everyone wanted the best money.  </p>
<p>00:41:33:26 - 00:41:56:14<br>John<br>Gold was for a long time, the best money were now living in this fiat experiment that has for about 50 years disrupted that, and the seeds of that were sown by gold's failures and its spatial limitations and its inherent ability and its difficulty to take custody and move around. But that experiment, as you've referenced, is is probably not long for the world.  </p>
<p>00:41:56:16 - 00:42:26:19<br>John<br>It's creating significant instability and political pushback in different pockets of the world in different ways. And it will be ultimately impossible for any corporation or any government to force people to value the dollar or any fiat currency more than they value Bitcoin. They might be able to for a time mandate usage. They might be able to enact certain laws that make using Bitcoin more burdensome.  </p>
<p>00:42:26:21 - 00:42:51:17<br>John<br>But, you know, as MI6 points out, in theory of money and credit, they can't make people subjectively value a currency, right? So the properties that make Bitcoin superior will inexorably pull people around the world to use it until to use it and store wealth. It until the point at which everyone in the world is using Bitcoin as their reserve asset.  </p>
<p>00:42:51:19 - 00:43:18:18<br>John<br>And oh, I can, I can stop there. But I would say there are two major implications of that that I think people who are even constructive on that thesis, people who even already own Bitcoin, whether you're an institutional allocator and you have some allocation of Bitcoin or you're just a pleb on Twitter, your stack SATs every day, both of those types of investors, both those types of savers will kind of only go that far and then stop.  </p>
<p>00:43:18:20 - 00:43:51:02<br>John<br>But if that's true, then it has two big implications, one of which is the picks and shovels, if you want, that will enable people to acquire Bitcoin, use it, store it safely, put it into lightning channels, spend it, ensure it, distribute it's custody, you know, whatever you want, all these different kind of applications that we can get into will naturally be booted up and will be required ultimately for that distribution process to take place.  </p>
<p>00:43:51:02 - 00:44:23:24<br>John<br>So for everyone, if everyone in the world is ultimately going to own and use Bitcoin, they will be doing that partially with the help of applications and service providers and tools developed by companies that are providing UX that allow them to do that with a ten x, 100 x better user experience. Some of that will be certainly free open source software that people can just download and run without any sort of connection to a company.  </p>
<p>00:44:23:26 - 00:44:44:23<br>John<br>But there will also be corporate service providers like Unchained or Anchor Watch or Strike or any other company that you see in our portfolio that can provide that can and will provide a better experience that will be demanded by the market as people look for ways to acquire and use Bitcoin. So they kind of go hand in hand, right?  </p>
<p>00:44:44:29 - 00:44:58:02<br>John<br>If you're bullish on Bitcoin's adoption, then you necessarily have to be bullish on it's picks and shovels too. So that's implication one, we can maybe unpack that or however you want to take it. We could have an application to maybe a second.  </p>
<p>00:44:58:04 - 00:45:18:04<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it's digging in. Implication one. I mean, you mentioned many of the different companies that are providing these tools and services to be able to reap the utility and the benefits of Bitcoin. But let's get a little more granular and better define the subsectors and the verticals that you think are addressing these different needs.  </p>
<p>00:45:18:07 - 00:45:42:05<br>John<br>Yeah, So I'll give you the way that we kind of cut it out, a temporary one, but this is not the only way to think about this space. And there's also obviously overlap between a lot of these. But the first most obvious one is, you know, to go back to Parker Lewis, you know, if Bitcoin is money, I think he wrote this in some piece ready to talk.  </p>
<p>00:45:42:05 - 00:46:25:28<br>John<br>But Bitcoin is money. The first order of product of money is financial services, right? So that's kind of the if you think about the addressable verticals in like concentric circles expanding out, one of the first center, the concentric circles is financial services products that allow you to save in Bitcoin effectively to custody it, to have obviously to to buy it as well, to buy it and treat it as necessary to take out loans against it and do anything else that involves interacting with the traditional fiat system and doing those interactions between traditional fiat system and Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:46:25:28 - 00:46:52:06<br>John<br>And so, you know, a few examples of a company like that would be obviously Unchained is one. They provide a lot of those services and we're kind of the forerunner in building kind of those services. It helped building out collaborative custody to allow a user to benefit from a, let's say, the benefit of a custodian without actually surrendering to custodial permission.  </p>
<p>00:46:52:06 - 00:47:32:07<br>John<br>So in a two of three multisig I as a retail or I as a company can hold two keys on chain, can hold one, and thereby eliminate the risk of eliminate or greatly reduce the risk of catastrophic loss. If my private keys, if my harbor walls are compromised. Right. They also provide kind of intuitive trading and lending services on top of that on one interface so that I can interact with my Bitcoin more in the way that I would be kind of used to doing if I'm coming from the traditional finance or fiat world, which ultimately like definitionally everyone is right, everyone's kind of coming from that world.  </p>
<p>00:47:32:13 - 00:48:12:21<br>John<br>And so a company that can provide a way to much more safely custody the Bitcoin and then also use it in these different ways that people are familiar with is highly valuable and very necessary to. Right. It's it's necessary for most people to have something like that to bridge from, you know, not just buying Bitcoin and leaving it on Coinbase, you know, having their Coinbase IOU or having their ETF IOU as as will increasingly be the case for for many people as their first kind of touchpoint in Bitcoin, but also not have to immediately make the leap to, you know, holding generational wealth on a hardware wallet in their desk or bearing in the ground  </p>
<p>00:48:12:21 - 00:48:54:27<br>John<br>somewhere right? Those are those are two ends of the spectrum that people are naturally uncomfortable with when they come to Bitcoin. And so having a collaborative custody option that also gives them the ability to interact with Bitcoin in ways that they're familiar with from a finance perspective is highly valuable and very important. And now we're also seeing, you know, you've bang the drum on this a lot over the last year or so, Multi-institutional Multisig So not just not even only having a relationship with Unchained, but having a two of three relationship with Unchained or on ramp or Egg Watch or various other kind of custody providers that we can talk about who form a quorum  </p>
<p>00:48:54:27 - 00:49:25:01<br>John<br>for you and allow you to interact with Bitcoin without ever actually having to touch private key material, which is necessary for a lot of institutions and enterprises that might want to use Bitcoin as a Treasury asset, but have fiduciary responsibilities that prevent them from being allowed to have the discretion over private material. Obviously, there's more of a trust tradeoff there, but it's trust distributed across three institutions rather than just a single point of failure.  </p>
<p>00:49:25:04 - 00:49:49:04<br>John<br>And for those who are listening, I would highly recommend reading Dhruv Bansal's piece from Unchained on building a network of keys, a network of designers. And I think that that principle will become very important to real institutional adoption of Bitcoin. And to our point earlier, that's an example of something that was not even on anyone's roadmap 3 to 4 years ago, right?  </p>
<p>00:49:49:06 - 00:50:11:26<br>John<br>It's only come about because of advances in Multisig and understanding of Multisig and getting more institutions kind of on board for that. And so that's an example of how a lot can really happen in a very short time. And a lot has happened to put Bitcoin and Bitcoin companies in a position to really bring mature offerings to market.  </p>
<p>00:50:11:26 - 00:50:18:21<br>John<br>So that's a lot. Just financial services. And I would you quickly run. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:50:18:23 - 00:50:47:28<br>Marty<br>Well I was going to I was going to say I would add with Unchained particularly, not only do they have the technical expertise to manage and create the software to manage these these multi-site quorum, so they also understand the asset as well and the financial side and the cyclical nature of Bitcoin's price history. And on their lending products specifically, I think this really shines through where they have extremely low LTV, which most people look at and like, Oh my God, that's pretty insane.  </p>
<p>00:50:47:28 - 00:51:21:09<br>Marty<br>But they understand the asset, the team understands the asset and they know that they're going to be a lot of volatility. So they have a low LTV to reduce the amount of liquidity and they never had a loan loss throughout their five plus years of offering this product. And when you juxtapose that like leaning into two to the 1031 horn here, a disclaimer for this episode, obviously 1031 is invested in a lot of the companies we're talking about, but I think Unchained shines through because we were getting made fun of four for quote unquote missing the Blockfi wait wave a few years ago.  </p>
<p>00:51:21:09 - 00:51:53:24<br>Marty<br>They hit a $4 billion valuation at the peak of the 2021 or 2022, and we made the conscious decision like, we don't trust the way that they're they're running their their lending product. It doesn't make any sense to us. And that proved to be a wise decision at the end of the day to allocate towards Unchained, which was much more conservative, having a fine understanding of the asset and the volatility that comes with the Bitcoin price and blockfi, which tried to apply this fiat model to the Bitcoin standard.  </p>
<p>00:51:53:24 - 00:52:00:03<br>Marty<br>And there's no lender of last resort in Bitcoin and if you lend it out, somebody lose it. You're not getting it back.  </p>
<p>00:52:00:05 - 00:52:26:28<br>John<br>Yeah, absolutely. It's a great point. Not having any loan losses on a product like that through two bear markets and the carnage that we saw in 2022 multiple times with and then blockfi then at the end of the year. Right. Like to, to make it through all of that with no loan losses. It's just really testament to what they built and also testament to just focus on Bitcoin and the importance of that.  </p>
<p>00:52:27:00 - 00:53:09:01<br>John<br>That's true for all the companies in our portfolio right? It's not just an ideological theme where we're we're Bitcoin maxes and so we only want to invest in people who are ideologically aligned. You could say that's like there's relevance to that. And I think that's a it says something about you as a founder. If you have kind of made the jump to understanding why Bitcoin is a sphere of money that will obsolete all of the money, but even more importantly just from an investing perspective, there's significant edge in understanding the asset that you're dealing with and the things that can go wrong with the volatility that Bitcoin experiences.  </p>
<p>00:53:09:08 - 00:53:35:15<br>John<br>If products like Bitcoin backed loan product is not structured well in terms of conservative LTVs and non rehab application of the underlying collateral, right? So that's just a feather in the cap, not just for Unchained, but for every business that is exclusively focused on Bitcoin because that is, that drives a real commercial edge and real sustainability to the business that I as an investor care about.  </p>
<p>00:53:35:15 - 00:54:03:08<br>John<br>Even independently of some sort of ideological viewpoint on Bitcoin versus any other cryptocurrency. But to to just quickly round out on your other question about the verticals that we look at, the others would be that are major ones would be kind of lightning and layer two. That's something like a strike or mutiny wallet, very different kinds of the spectrum of what they provide that those are leveraging lightning to do really innovative things.  </p>
<p>00:54:03:10 - 00:54:27:27<br>John<br>I would say also it's not even our focus is not even so much on lightning as such, although that's the only real like layer to protocol that is battle tested and has existed for, you know, five plus years. So we've done a lot in lightning, but I think I say lightning slash layer two because we are open to the idea of new protocols coming along that could also have commercial viability and commercial use cases.  </p>
<p>00:54:28:04 - 00:54:51:03<br>John<br>You might call, you know, it's like controversial perhaps what you might call experiment protocol, right? Like a layer two in some way. I know, again, like there's some disagreement on if that's the right way to approach that. But it is kind of an additional protocol that, you know, only really came about in the last couple of years that extends Bitcoin's utility and provides kind of new ways to interact with Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:54:51:03 - 00:55:15:01<br>John<br>And you're seeing that with what fairly is spinning up. And, you know, famously kind of you and Odell were the ones that spoke very into into existence. And I let you speak on that a little but if you want but also now muni wallet, like I mentioned on the lightning side, also doing a lot with the payment protocol to kind of carve out their own use cases in their own niches.  </p>
<p>00:55:15:01 - 00:55:37:18<br>John<br>And so that that also speaks to what you were asking earlier about whether it's too early or not. Like Ferryman is a great example of that, of just the vibrancy that we're seeing in the ecosystem over the last couple of years. And because these are open source protocols, a lightning company can very easily kind of integrate very many capabilities in some way or financial services company.  </p>
<p>00:55:37:18 - 00:55:58:26<br>John<br>You can integrate lightning or, you know, you can have all these kind of cross vertical pollination in a way that you really can't in closed source tech stacks or kind of more broadly diversified VC portfolios where you're investing in fintech and insurer tech and health tech and all these different kind of things that don't really talk to each other, play with each other.  </p>
<p>00:55:58:26 - 00:56:29:17<br>John<br>So, you know, that's kind of the second major vertical. Again, I said A round it out quickly and I failed to do that. But take your time. I'll just say quickly, you know, consumer applications are maybe the next one. So something like primal or fold or, you know, Bitcoin gaming plays, all of those are kind of using Bitcoin in ways that talk to and, you know, make sense with existing consumer use cases.  </p>
<p>00:56:29:20 - 00:56:58:28<br>John<br>They're not necessarily about Bitcoin, but they're more akin to using Bitcoin as a means to an end to drive consumer engagement and establish consumer behaviors. So social does you know, rewards. Obviously rewards is I don't have the number stuff in my head, but a massive category that merchants spend billions of dollars on every year and fall is focused on using Bitcoin to create interoperable rewards much more valuable to consumers.  </p>
<p>00:56:59:01 - 00:57:23:13<br>John<br>You've got Primal, which is obviously a noster client. Noster is itself not just an utter client, but a master client and tech stack. But Noster itself is, you know, another kind of protocol which some have maybe call it a layer three. I don't really like that classification, but whatever. But it's one of these other kind of edge protocols that can naturally directly interact with Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:57:23:13 - 00:58:00:19<br>John<br>As you know, it's an open source communications protocol interacting with an open source money protocol. Right. And so that's that's another good example of like replication. And then you also the last two would be kind of mining infrastructure. And so that's prop mining plays like actual companies that are doing self mining grid being an example of that, and then also just picks and shovels around mining value added services and technology to allow miners to gain advantage or to power themselves off power sources that would otherwise be inaccessible.  </p>
<p>00:58:00:21 - 00:58:22:08<br>John<br>So upstream data is an example of that. Also Giga Energy, but both of whom are really seeing a lot of great uptake among oil and gas producers, something that you've talked about a lot on the show and we think is going to be a huge theme, which maybe we can talk about a little more as it relates to the way that Bitcoin was slowly kind of spread out and hit the world and get these other industries.  </p>
<p>00:58:22:10 - 00:58:47:24<br>John<br>And then, you know, last vertical, I would say would be security infrastructure. So that's any hardware or software that enables either a single user or institution to securely and or privately interact with Bitcoin. The most obvious example of that being coin tight and, you know, the gold card, the taps or the various products they have to make that accessible for everyone.  </p>
<p>00:58:47:24 - 00:59:14:27<br>John<br>And that's another good example of, you know, five years ago those products were substantially less advanced than they are now. Taps on or didn't exist. Gold Card was several iterations earlier, and they've made a variety of improvements since then that have kind of turned that product into the gold standard for for interacting with Bitcoin securely and privately in a way that any random web can go access.  </p>
<p>00:59:15:00 - 00:59:45:18<br>John<br>So yet another example that we're exactly at the right point to start investing aggressively in these companies, we're hitting the point at which to or to paraphrase Andresen in his software piece, he said, we're finally at the point where all of this technology can be delivered to consumers at scale around the world, where we're maybe not exactly like right there at that spot yet with Bitcoin, but we're very close and want to be investing in these companies.  </p>
<p>00:59:45:18 - 01:00:06:29<br>John<br>When you can see the contours of that taking shape, not when it's already happened and you're kind of just saying what everyone's already right. So there's still a lot of alpha to be generated in investing in these types of companies. It's a long winded response, but that's the general kind of heuristic I guess I would use to carve up the overall infrastructure.  </p>
<p>01:00:07:01 - 01:00:40:07<br>Marty<br>Yeah, as there's a lot to go down. That's why I love about the team we've assembled at 1031 because obviously I have experience on the mining side of things. That's heavily focused on privacy, lightning, Napster, freedom, tech, more broadly yourself. Grant Jonathan, really understand the financial services side of things, and I think we complement each other extremely well, which allows us to go do a lot of these interesting deals and explore the full breadth of the industry as it's forming.  </p>
<p>01:00:40:07 - 01:01:07:04<br>Marty<br>And the going back to the mining stuff like that is again, coming off the tails of the Energy mining summit in Nashville. The one thing that interests me about the mining place specifically is it's somewhat of a proxy play on energy more broadly, which I think is going to be a massive theme over the next decade as it's becoming abundantly clear that we've completely bought the energy systems of the world to a certain extent, it needs to be fixed.  </p>
<p>01:01:07:04 - 01:01:31:17<br>Marty<br>There's going to be a lack of supply in a lot of areas, which is naturally going to drive up prices, and these companies are going to be looking to create efficiencies and off grid mining on grid mining for that matter as well. Both provide alternate revenue streams are just going to be desperately needed by these energy companies. But then going on that too, like the rewards play with fold just makes sense.  </p>
<p>01:01:31:21 - 01:01:51:07<br>Marty<br>Why would you lock somebody into some company ship token? We can just give them bitcoin rewards. They can spend that anywhere. Financial services. I think they're going to get more robust as people begin to hold more Bitcoin for longer periods of time and you have it in the piece, yet the hodl waves that prove that that is happening.  </p>
<p>01:01:51:10 - 01:02:00:10<br>Marty<br>So yeah, I think the timing is ripe and now we just spent like 30 minutes on the application. One What's application to do you remember. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:02:00:12 - 01:02:25:27<br>John<br>Yeah. And I, I, I got it. Yeah. I mean putting a pen, an application one, it's basically, there's probably $1,000,000,000,000, I'm throwing out a number but I think it's something like that, $1,000,000,000,000 of revenue opportunity just in the picks and shovels, if you want to call it that, of the enabling technologies that will see tremendous demand on the back of growing Bitcoin adoption.  </p>
<p>01:02:25:29 - 01:02:58:15<br>John<br>And it's it's both just the companies that exist today with the capabilities Bitcoin already has. But it's also, you know, the companies that will emerge on top of this current generation of, you know, innovators. Right. I think I think about something like I put in the piece like a Shopify, $100 billion plus market cap business or, you know, Salesforce or ServiceNow or you can think of a bunch of different kind of tech businesses are not in like the Magnificent Seven but are still like very, very valuable and do billions of dollars of revenue.  </p>
<p>01:02:58:17 - 01:03:41:13<br>John<br>Those couldn't have existed like 20 years ago. You needed prior advancements in bandwidth and networking and server architecture as well as just like the distribution of like high speed Internet and the growth of like consumer computing devices to enable something like e-commerce. Right? But once you have all of those things in place and you have the capability for e-commerce, then now you can build a business like Shopify and there will be more businesses coming down the pipe just in kind of the picks and shovels category of Bitcoin companies that couldn't have existed without work being done by like the current innovators that we're seeing today.  </p>
<p>01:03:41:21 - 01:04:02:16<br>John<br>So that will continue to be, you know, it's not just like what's the opportunity right now for the companies that exist today. It's also a question of what are the companies today going to enable that will allow for some totally, you know, a possible use case use case that's impossible today, but will be very mainstream within kind of Bitcoin picks and shovels in ten years.  </p>
<p>01:04:02:16 - 01:04:28:25<br>John<br>Right. So that'll compound of that. That'll be in our community kind of by itself over the next couple of decades. That's implication one generally the picks and shovels are going to do great. I think application too is what we like to say at 31 is just like every company had to be an Internet company had become an Internet company over the course of the last 20 years to survive and to stay relevant and to thrive.  </p>
<p>01:04:28:27 - 01:05:05:24<br>John<br>So every company will have to become a Bitcoin company to survive. The kind of reasons for that and the drivers for that are multifold. You No. One is that as those Bitcoin picks and shovel providers start to gain traction, start to build real businesses, the ones that are touching those kind of inner parts of the concentric circles of Bitcoin verticals will start to naturally disrupt things like payments, infrastructure, right, and financial services, which we just talked about and asset management.  </p>
<p>01:05:05:26 - 01:05:38:14<br>John<br>And you know, I think it shouldn't be understated how revolutionary digital buried value that's absolutely scarce that can be instantly settled anywhere around the world at any time. How radical how radical of a paradigm shift that is relative to the Rube Goldberg machine of the chain of, you know, credits and IOUs and counterparty risks that are required to make, you know, a single transaction at a supermarket work right?  </p>
<p>01:05:38:22 - 01:06:08:25<br>John<br>There's so much fixed cost built into that. There's significant delays in settlement. There's armies of accountants and technicians and lawyers kind of holding that all together with duct tape. And that's how, you know, the traditional payment system is built. And over time, you know, the history of economic development, I guess the arc of history bends toward technological innovation, winning.  </p>
<p>01:06:08:28 - 01:06:38:22<br>John<br>Now the arc of history bends toward, as Jeff Bezos said, you know, your margin being my opportunity. Free markets such as we have them, maybe they're not as robust as we as we would like in the US today, but they're still still operating to some extent. Free markets are ruthless about excess margin and inefficiency. And if there's a way to take costs out of the system, if there's a way to do something that serves end users better and that an entrepreneur can profit from doing, the market will do that.  </p>
<p>01:06:38:24 - 01:07:03:29<br>John<br>It's just a question of what it takes. And, you know, payments, infrastructure and financial services are kind of like the first industry in the crosshairs of Bitcoin picks and shovels, companies that will develop and start to kind of encroach on their territory, right, Because they're providing end users a better, more cost effective, more secure way to make payments to custody assets, etc..  </p>
<p>01:07:04:01 - 01:07:30:15<br>John<br>And so when you think about an application, that's kind of the first way it plays out is incumbents look at that growing trend, which is an inexorable trend. If you believe that Bitcoin adoption is is inexorable and it will grow to everyone in the world, they'll look at that trend and say we need to either integrate Bitcoin in some way, we need to, you know, develop capabilities on our own or we need to buy some of these companies.  </p>
<p>01:07:30:15 - 01:07:58:28<br>John<br>Right. We think, you know, at 1031 that the option that a lot of incumbents will choose is to be strategic acquirers to avoid kind of being the victims of the melting ice cube of watching their businesses evaporate. But there will also be, you know, forward thinking companies, forward thinking blue chips that you know, maybe do have the ability to kind of develop in-house.  </p>
<p>01:07:59:01 - 01:08:26:03<br>John<br>But either way, what you will effectively see is more incumbents of traditional industries needing to integrate Bitcoin in some way and becoming Bitcoin companies. And so that expands the service area for what you can invest in as as an investor focused on Bitcoin infrastructure. The the other thing to consider is I guess I would say just to put a little more detail on that, it's not just speculation, right?  </p>
<p>01:08:26:03 - 01:08:57:06<br>John<br>Like we're already seeing it with a variety of companies, even outside of you're seeing it in payments, you're seeing it in your services. But even expanding outside of that to some of these further the rings that are further out in the concentric circles right. Oil and gas, power, utilities, like you mentioned, Bitcoin mining is getting substantially more integrated into those industries in a way that, you know, was very much on display as as you mentioned in at the National Energy and Mining Summit last week.  </p>
<p>01:08:57:09 - 01:09:46:02<br>John<br>There are senators that are kind of seeing that connection. There are major energy executives on both the grid utility side and also on the regulatory side and the oil and gas side that are seeing that the synergy between Bitcoin mining and what they do and trying to leverage it. So that's already playing out and it's not surprising because it's exactly what we saw happen, you know, with the Internet, logistics companies, manufacturing companies, medical device companies, you know, all had to start leveraging Internet capabilities if they wanted to compete with both upstarts, you know, start ups that were kind of doing something interesting with Internet enabled software in their industries and also their more forward thinking  </p>
<p>01:09:46:02 - 01:10:16:05<br>John<br>incumbent competitors that were either buying those companies or trying to develop similar solutions in-house. Right. And so if Bitcoin is just as or more influential to global commerce as the Internet, then you would expect to see the exact same with companies in every industry. And, you know, like I said, we're already seeing at some of the points in the portfolio and maybe the most kind of exciting implication.  </p>
<p>01:10:16:07 - 01:10:48:07<br>John<br>So the implication of that, I guess for us as investors is when we see companies like Stat News, we have an A portfolio, a non Bitcoin company see the power of Bitcoin and what it might be able to do for their business over the long term and come to us to invest in them and to give them some guidance on their Bitcoin strategy and to have us on the cap table because we're aligned with seeing the way that the world is going to go with Bitcoin adoption.  </p>
<p>01:10:48:10 - 01:11:30:25<br>John<br>And so that's an example of, you know, an early example of something that I think we'll see a lot more over the next ten years is nine Bitcoin companies of various different sizes kind of, you know, pre-seed stage startups and Series B series C companies that are about to go public looking at this trend and deciding they need to find ways to integrate Bitcoin in some way, whether that's lightning micropayments for like a consumer application or whether that's, you know, heavy industry companies looking at ways to they're going to use bitcoin mining like you've referenced, we you know that will dramatically open up service or even further for investors who are focused on on the  </p>
<p>01:11:30:25 - 01:11:37:08<br>John<br>space. And you know, I put some numbers around it at the end of the piece. It's it's virtually impossible to call that up.  </p>
<p>01:11:37:08 - 01:11:38:07<br>Marty<br>Well.  </p>
<p>01:11:38:10 - 01:12:09:23<br>John<br>Yes. You know, it's a little I don't want it to be, you know, moon math or kind of pie in the sky thinking. But if everything that I've just said is right, is Bitcoin adoption is going to do what we think it's going to do, if it's going to lead to, you know, $1,000,000,000,000 plus of new value created by picks and shovels, providers and is itself also that's going to lead incumbents to look for ways to integrate Bitcoin in their own industries, All of which I think is kind of, you know, follows from just being superior money.  </p>
<p>01:12:09:26 - 01:12:39:10<br>John<br>If that's the case, then Bitcoin infrastructure will capture some percentage of the revenue generated by all those industries that need to start integrating Bitcoin. It'll enter their value stack in some way or they'll just be disrupted and the revenue streams will be replaced by companies that are leveraging Bitcoin. And so with just all the just the set of industries that I talk about specifically in the piece, obviously this is not even, you know, all the industries in the world.  </p>
<p>01:12:39:10 - 01:13:13:21<br>John<br>These are just the ones that are kind of the most obviously impacted by Bitcoin. You know, with 1% revenue penetration, you can get to like, you know, $100 billion in category revenue for kind of Bitcoin companies. This is a very like high level rough heuristic way to kind of think about the opportunity. But it gets at the intuition that because Bitcoin is money and monetary technology will affect every industry in some way, there is no commerce at any scale that can avoid tapping into and being touched by monetary technology.  </p>
<p>01:13:13:24 - 01:13:32:17<br>John<br>Bitcoin will have a role somewhere in the value stack of all those industries and even more. And so once you start to take that seriously, you have to ask yourself, even at very low penetration of those revenue streams. And to be clear, like in financial services and payments in oil and gas, like I think the penetration is going to be a lot higher than 1%.  </p>
<p>01:13:32:20 - 01:13:54:04<br>John<br>What does that mean for the available revenue? What does that mean, like the TAM? Right. To go back to the beginning of our conversation of this category of companies and, you know, it puts them even at a conservative estimate, you know, around like the size of enterprise SAS Enterprise SAS is like a 200 to $300 billion revenue category annually.  </p>
<p>01:13:54:08 - 01:14:15:01<br>John<br>And so at fairly penetration of even just a select few of the most obvious industries that should be disrupted by Bitcoin or should be affected by Bitcoin in some way, you're basically asking a process level because Bitcoin gets to play across all of these different verticals because it's money, because this is monetary technology that everyone needs in some way.  </p>
<p>01:14:15:03 - 01:14:21:27<br>John<br>So as you know, as Andreasen says, that's the big opportunity. That's where we're putting our money.  </p>
<p>01:14:21:29 - 01:14:32:20<br>Marty<br>I mean, I thought I was bullish after helping you edit read the piece then read again after you published, but hearing you articulate it in person just got me even more bullish. It's pretty insane.  </p>
<p>01:14:32:22 - 01:14:37:10<br>John<br>Yeah. I mean, no one is bullish enough, right? But it's also.  </p>
<p>01:14:37:13 - 01:15:07:29<br>Marty<br>And so I think with all that in mind, like we've talked about the trend of incumbent companies adopting a Bitcoin strategy, why do you think the incumbent venture capital space has not seen this? And why do you think even within the broader crypto venture capital space, this thesis hasn't been recognized and there's a relatively small pool that we're playing in at 1031?  </p>
<p>01:15:08:02 - 01:15:37:09<br>John<br>Yeah, absolutely. I think it's a couple of things up until 20 to 22 when you finally had the wash out of a lot of the froth of zero the and observe and a lot of which was in kind of the altcoin industry. Part of the reason, I think, was because venture capitalists, you know, looked at altcoins as this unprecedented opportunity to get quick liquidity.  </p>
<p>01:15:37:09 - 01:15:59:04<br>John<br>Right. You can in the market where literally every asset that's not tied down is just constantly going up in value. And you can always underwrite like someone's going to come pay me two X or five x or ten x multiple for, you know, this round that I'm doing right now. Someone's going to come work me up or, you know, there's just money sloshing around and I can I can find a buyer somewhere.  </p>
<p>01:15:59:06 - 01:16:24:13<br>John<br>There's, you know, there's, first of all, minimal incentive to diligence in the long term viability of any project because it's it's all kind of a greater fool game. But I think specifically with crypto in DC, there was this unprecedented opportunity to pull forward liquidity events, right? Normally in venture capital, you know, when you're making an investment, it's it's a liquid.  </p>
<p>01:16:24:15 - 01:16:43:10<br>John<br>You know, your investment timeline could be anywhere from three years to five years to seven years to like ten years. Right. And, you know, ideally, if you make good investment selection, you're compensated at least on a few of those investments with, you know, outsized ten x 20, 600,000 X type returns. But it takes a long time to get there.  </p>
<p>01:16:43:13 - 01:17:11:10<br>John<br>And there's there's kind of like the purest form of VC is like the ultimate low time preference game where it should be. But in the last few years, again, up until the the wash out of 2022, you had a lot of VCs able to get, you know, liquidity in like six months by funding some token project and taking a big allocation of a pre mined or just an allocation of, you know, founder tokens, right.  </p>
<p>01:17:11:13 - 01:17:39:04<br>John<br>And then listing those publicly somewhere on some exchange and hiding it, spending some amount of money to hype them up, having a good marketing team and you know, selling those I'll say to to retail aggressively and for some retail investors that maybe out a little bit if you timed it exactly right. But for most that was probably not a good trade, but it was generally a great trade for for the VCs that had the pre mines.  </p>
<p>01:17:39:04 - 01:18:09:13<br>John<br>Right. And you know, it allowed them to operate with to have kind of the return profile of a venture capital fund with the time horizon of a hedge fund, which is a compelling argument. If all you care about is kind of very short term fiat gains and not kind of building a long term business and, you know, investing for where the world is going, not just kind of where it is right now, kind of right at the tail end of observer, Right.  </p>
<p>01:18:09:16 - 01:18:43:12<br>John<br>So that was one of the big things that I think led to substantial distraction in DC space, which just like you can't do that with Bitcoin right this time I'm at 21 million Bitcoin. You there's no way to game a bitcoin company such that you can, you know, go sell a bunch of pre-made tokens to do retail. And so if you're going to invest in a company that's building on Bitcoin, you have to be willing to invest for at least a few years, right?  </p>
<p>01:18:43:15 - 01:19:29:12<br>John<br>I do think we will have some exits in our portfolio within the next like 3 to 5 years, but there will be some that take longer. And in any case, like we will be unlikely to have, you know, 5000 next market event in the next month from, you know, a pre mine that we kind of drove. And so if if that's what you're optimizing for I can see why you would only focus on kind of you know crypto schemes as we saw you know as we predicted at 1031 and, you know, as we structured ARC an investment thesis to express this theme, but that all ultimately blew up to significant kind of reputational damage to  </p>
<p>01:19:29:14 - 01:19:48:27<br>John<br>some of the investors were involved me, the founders who were involved. And you know, also beyond reputational damage, like if, if you were not the winner of the musical chairs game, then you're sitting there with a really big markdown and a lot of zeros to take back to your lips. So that worked out ultimately, kind of as we thought it would.  </p>
<p>01:19:48:27 - 01:20:08:04<br>John<br>It was, as I said, like a musical chairs game that could be played for a little while but was not ultimately sustainable. But it was, I think, a huge distraction and a huge source of noise for any crypto. We see that otherwise it might have taken the time to look at where the space is actually going over the next ten years.  </p>
<p>01:20:08:04 - 01:20:43:26<br>John<br>Right now. So that's the first big thing. The other thing I think is Bitcoin is a big paradigm shift in thinking for anyone who comes from a traditional finance background. We referenced this a little at the beginning, but yeah, you generally like when you're operating in kind of a fairly short termist, Keynesian influenced mindset and that's how you've been taught in college and all of your colleagues around you think the same way and that's how you have to play the, the game that you're in professionally.  </p>
<p>01:20:43:28 - 01:21:08:09<br>John<br>It actually it's like it's not profitable for you on a day to day basis to step back and ask yourself the question of what is money right? That's like a huge distraction. It takes 100 plus hours to even start to kind of grok the underlying problems that money is trying to solve. And then another thousand hours to understand like why Bitcoin is money and how it works and everything.  </p>
<p>01:21:08:12 - 01:21:33:28<br>John<br>If you're from a background where 2% inflation is good because because economists say so, and that's the sign of a growing economy. And that's just like an axiom that you take for granted. It's very difficult for you to kind of step back and evaluate what would actually make good money and where Why actually does money need to lose value progressively over time?  </p>
<p>01:21:34:00 - 01:22:10:06<br>John<br>And why why do we have a central bank issuing money ex nihilo to greater and greater degrees every every year? Right. So I think part of it is just there's a need to step back and do work that traditional finance roles don't necessarily incentivize you to do so for the people who are early to that process and take the time and get pulled down the rabbit hole early, you know, there's there's alpha to be generated.  </p>
<p>01:22:10:06 - 01:22:48:23<br>John<br>There's there's an asymmetry in kind of being first to that to the conclusions that would follow from asking those questions. Just like there's a symmetry to, you know, just owning Bitcoin initially, you know, before before the rest of the world catches on. So there is also asymmetry to owning equity in Bitcoin companies. Before most crypto investors or traditional VCs understand the implications of Bitcoin being money and what it means for their investments in, you know, other crypto projects and what it also means for their lack of exposure to Bitcoin infrastructure companies.  </p>
<p>01:22:48:26 - 01:23:15:19<br>Marty<br>Yeah, extremely well put. And I think beyond that, like I think what we're doing a 1031 to, to pump a pump around chest here I think again since we're bitcoin I think that's a it's becoming clear in the broader VC market as if you have a thematic fund focused on a very niche market. It's probably more advantageous for you.  </p>
<p>01:23:15:21 - 01:23:43:27<br>Marty<br>But I really like what we've done with Grant, Jonathan, Matt, myself, you have done to really imbue the nature and the ethos of Bitcoin on what we're doing with our with our tribe events, really trying to communicate, hyper communicate with LPs to let them know what's going on in the portfolio and then getting the portfolio companies themselves to speak with each other, to do some knowledge share to figure out how they can work with each other, because that's another unique.  </p>
<p>01:23:43:27 - 01:24:06:01<br>Marty<br>Part of what we're doing at 1031, the portfolio that we've developed is a lot of the companies you didn't even mention explicitly, but you're talking about Unchained. They work with Code Card, They work with them pulled out space to an extent as their block Explorer. There's many other synergies across the portfolio that the can materialize because you're building on this open source protocol.  </p>
<p>01:24:06:03 - 01:24:16:29<br>Marty<br>It's so early and so investing in one company, you can help out another company in the portfolio as they can collaborate and sort of raise each other's boats.  </p>
<p>01:24:17:02 - 01:24:42:04<br>John<br>Yeah, absolutely. And like I said, you know, I referenced this earlier, I think a little bit, but you don't get that opportunity to benefit from those synergies if you are like a broad, diversified investor, you know, early stage investor, ABC Investing in pretty much every vertical out there and kind of taking a spray and pray approach to not just every vertical, but also the many companies populating those verticals right.  </p>
<p>01:24:42:06 - 01:25:23:04<br>John<br>And so I think that's you know, I reference this earlier, it's kind of the very beginning, but like there's there are huge returns to specialization and focus, even if you're a capital allocator out there, kind of hearing this message and thinking, you know, being somewhat skeptical of some of our conclusions about money or about Bitcoin as money, you know, there's no denying, I think that, like I mentioned earlier, the citadels, the millenniums, values and etc., of the world that have kind of gone to this highly focused multi-manager framework where you have very smart investors going into wide mile deep on very particular sectors, you know, has generated outsized returns for those strategies.  </p>
<p>01:25:23:10 - 01:25:56:01<br>John<br>And I think it's no different here. You can't overstate the power of being highly hyper focused on one very particular theme, which for us is Bitcoin and Bitcoin infrastructure, both because it makes you understand that the companies building on that better than anyone else. So you can identify what looks promising and what doesn't, where the weak points might be, where the opportunities might be better and faster than anyone else, but also because it gives you just the best network that you could possibly have.  </p>
<p>01:25:56:04 - 01:26:25:19<br>John<br>Many of the companies in our portfolio, you know, are exclusive to us because you and Matt and Grant, Jonathan, have just developed relationships with some of the founders over years and years. And when, you know, smart developers finally just kind of wanted to put pen to paper and build out an idea into a company, like they came to us and said like, Hey, I want you to be the only investor on cap table because I know you and I learned a lot from you In the case of you and Matt.  </p>
<p>01:26:25:21 - 01:26:57:08<br>John<br>And I know we're aligned and I've gotten a ton of advice from you in the past, and so let's just do it. You guys will be the only one of the cap table. You don't get that by being highly diversified, right? You don't get by having, you know, a sleeve that invests in Solana and a sleeve that focuses on the Ethereum ecosystem and a sleeve that you know does some other random like tech vertical integrated with them, like a $100 billion portfolio that's invested in some other things.  </p>
<p>01:26:57:08 - 01:27:28:06<br>John<br>Right? You get that by being hyper focused and on the ground all the time with the the smartest people who are pushing the space forward. So again, as I just think about like, you know, whether you care about the Federal Reserve, whether you care about, you know, Bitcoin as money or not, you know, I would just consider, as you're looking at the space you know, ask yourself who's best positioned to if we're right about this to benefit the most from it and to make the best investment selections within.  </p>
<p>01:27:28:06 - 01:27:56:04<br>John<br>This theme is it someone who spends 1% of their time per year kind of casually thinking about the space and trying to arrange some calls with founders whenever he can? Or is it someone who is entirely obsessively focused on this and lives and breathes it every single day? You know, 24 hours, seven a week? Basically, I think that the questions to kind of answer itself focus is a highly powerful lever to driving investment returns.  </p>
<p>01:27:56:04 - 01:27:58:28<br>John<br>And that's a big part of what we do focus.  </p>
<p>01:27:58:28 - 01:28:07:06<br>Marty<br>It's important. It's important for us, the companies. It's beautiful thing, It's fun. Are you having fun, John?  </p>
<p>01:28:07:08 - 01:28:14:18<br>John<br>I am having fun. It's it's a great time waking up and doing Bitcoin stuff all day is a dream come true. It's a ton of fun.  </p>
<p>01:28:14:21 - 01:28:39:17<br>Marty<br>Well, there's a big leap of faith for, you coming from Citadel. You could have rode that train pretty far. Uh, came to a somewhat upstart venture fund in the Bitcoin space in 1031 at a time when the market was blowing up. What's the first two years working full time in the space been like? Reflecting right now or introspection?  </p>
<p>01:28:39:19 - 01:29:12:04<br>John<br>Yeah, I mean, it should tell you a lot about my conviction, right? Like, yeah, you know, just I wouldn't just of jump for any opportunity. I really do think temporary one's very unique. I think you know if you look at what we've done just in the last two years, deploying over $100 million, the space the biggest portfolio in the space, like I mentioned, a ton of our investments are exclusive because of the relationships we built up over the last ten plus years with with you and Matt and the Grant Jonathan as well.  </p>
<p>01:29:12:07 - 01:29:37:26<br>John<br>And I think it's just fully validated. The last two years have fully kind of why I made the decision I made and made me even more kind of bullish about the opportunity that I see out of us. The ecosystem is, like you mentioned, even more vibrant than I expected it to be, kind of when I was, you know, on the outside looking in, paying attention as much as I could to companies and the builders in the space.  </p>
<p>01:29:37:28 - 01:29:57:10<br>John<br>You know, that was not enough to help me fully appreciate how much development and how much innovation there actually is and how quickly it's moving. When you're focusing on it every day, you really see that, you know, front and center. And so that's all been very validating. But yeah, I, I think, you know, the proof is in the pudding.  </p>
<p>01:29:57:10 - 01:30:12:15<br>John<br>Our work speaks for itself. And, you know, I think there's $1,000,000,000 plus of deployment opportunity out there in just the next few years in the space that we can go tackle and that we plan to tackle. So excited.  </p>
<p>01:30:12:18 - 01:30:53:05<br>Marty<br>Yeah. What excites me to like this morning we sent out that letter to FinCEN and cosigned by a lot of the companies in our portfolio. And that's that's one thing that gives me incredible joy. Obviously working with people like you, Matt Grant and Jonathan is incredible, but then obviously continuing to develop relationships with the people, the builders, for lack of a better term, creating the infrastructure that is going to lead us to a Bitcoin standard has been extremely rewarding and to add to that, like I do think the people that are building out this infrastructure right now are in it to win it, number one, but get it as well.  </p>
<p>01:30:53:07 - 01:31:20:04<br>Marty<br>I think the cosigning of that letter to FinCEN was indicative of that, that people understand the gravity of the situation that exists in our world right now, that things are terribly broken. We need to to fix them. And people have formed companies and are building tools to go fix the world. And it there's obviously a large enormous economic opportunity as you laid out in Bitcoin is eating the world.  </p>
<p>01:31:20:04 - 01:31:42:10<br>Marty<br>But that's the other thing when you can marry that economic opportunity with a a drive for virtue in the world, which I believe all the companies in our portfolio are doing, it's just a very special thing. And I feel very fortunate to be on this journey with you, with everybody else at 1031 and everybody else in the portfolio.  </p>
<p>01:31:42:12 - 01:32:27:18<br>John<br>Yeah, no, no doubt. Yeah. I would be remiss if I didn't mention, you know, when I as I as I said, kind of at the start of this conversation, you know, growing up 15, 16, 17 year old kid into Ron Paul and into ending the Fed and preserving, you know, civil liberties in the US and kind of returning the country to some of the principles on which, you know, I think it was founded I was really disillusioned with the prospects for that over kind of my time going to college and then going into internal finance roles, not necessarily because there's anyone particularly I mean, certainly I think there are executives in the space and some  </p>
<p>01:32:27:18 - 01:32:56:28<br>John<br>of those companies that are actively working against all of those principles. But more than anything, I just you know, you kind of encounter like a degree of apathy about any of that. And, you know, I think it's been very invigorating to see both my coworkers. 1031 you guys, but also, like you said, all the founders that I work with that we work with are also very driven by, in most cases, those principles.  </p>
<p>01:32:56:28 - 01:33:24:17<br>John<br>And and sometimes in some cases, certainly we disagree. There's not, you know, ideological homogeneity among the portfolio by any means, but where it matters and where it counts, the people that we invest in are very, very highly principled. And yeah, I shouldn't understate how unique that is. And frankly, I also think on the long term, on a long term basis, that that drives investment returns too.  </p>
<p>01:33:24:21 - 01:33:37:21<br>John<br>So it's a it's a double edged benefit for us both the financial case long term of the winning in the world and also just what it means for the types of founders that we get to interact with.  </p>
<p>01:33:37:24 - 01:34:02:28<br>Marty<br>Yeah It's a beautiful thing. John. This piece was incredible. If you haven't read it yet, you're listening to this. Go read, go read it. We'll link to it in the show notes if you want to find out anything more, we're doing it. 1031 Find us at 1031 dot V.C. Before we wrap up here, is there anything we didn't cover or mention that you think we should get out to the freaks before we wrap up here?  </p>
<p>01:34:03:01 - 01:34:33:13<br>John<br>Yeah. You know, the last thing I'll say is, just like, I think we all see a temporary one. Like, there's a degree of humility required in being, like, an investor. Like, none of us know exactly where the space is going to go over the next couple of years. I don't think, like, you know, Freddie, that we mentioned earlier like that as much as you and that we're kind of on the forefront of kind of speaking that whole project into reality and really marketing it and getting the right people in the right rooms to, you know, bring it forth.  </p>
<p>01:34:33:15 - 01:34:52:20<br>John<br>You know, none of us necessarily saw that coming like only a couple of years ago. And there will be things like that in the next couple of years where we're like, you know, things develop in a certain way a lot faster than maybe we expected or, you know, a new like scaling initiative happens, you know, in terms of like a soft fork or a new layer to protocol.  </p>
<p>01:34:52:20 - 01:35:12:13<br>John<br>It's that opens up really interesting new possibilities. Like all those things are possible. And I think, you know, the I guess the sign of a good investor is someone who has like strong convictions, weakly held. You know, we have the ability to kind of look at the landscape and see it evolving and have the humility to know, like we can't plot out like exactly way that everything is going to go.  </p>
<p>01:35:12:17 - 01:35:42:04<br>John<br>We certainly have some opinions, and I think many of our convictions will be proven correct over the next ten years or so. But what I would say is I'm just really excited to be in a position where we have a unique position to see those changes kind of as they unfold like we're on the ground at the King Park and the Bitcoin commons, you know, with the founders and the devs and the really intelligent people who are making those changes and pushing things forward and innovating.  </p>
<p>01:35:42:07 - 01:36:00:22<br>John<br>And so, you know, we have humility, the humility to know that we don't exactly know everything's going. But I think we are uniquely positioned to kind of be there when those inflection points happened and kind of see the big changes. But before almost anyone else is looking at the space. So, yeah, that's what I close with.  </p>
<p>01:36:00:25 - 01:36:08:08<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it's perfect. Close with John. It's been a pleasure. We're going to do this quite often moving forward, you know?  </p>
<p>01:36:08:13 - 01:36:09:12<br>John<br>Yeah. I mean.  </p>
<p>01:36:09:14 - 01:36:28:04<br>Marty<br>We need to break you out from what we've been. We've been hiding, John. Like in a corner. Not in a corner, but like, Hey, this guy's got too much alpha, but it's a it's been a pleasure working with you. The way you approach what we're doing at 1031, your consummate professional, I think you really accelerate what we what we're trying to do here.  </p>
<p>01:36:28:04 - 01:36:40:02<br>Marty<br>And it's I feel very fortunate to be able to work side by side with you and meet up in different cities around the country, around the world, even just yeah, go push Bitcoin forward.  </p>
<p>01:36:40:05 - 01:36:46:16<br>John<br>Appreciate it, man. Totally, totally agree. Still, he's mutual and there's a lot of work to do, so we're just getting started.  </p>
<p>01:36:46:18 - 01:36:49:09<br>Marty<br>Yeah, that's what we got today for this piece of love You.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[Scrib]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/bitcoin-is-eating-the-world-john-arnold/">Read original post</a></p>
<h3><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h3>
<p>The conversation with John Arnold from <a href="https://ten31.vc/home?ref=tftc.io">Ten31</a> highlights the vast economic opportunity that bitcoin and its infrastructure present to the world. Bitcoin, being superior money, is expected to be adopted universally, and this adoption will drive demand for companies building applications and services around it. The discussion delves into the potential of bitcoin to disrupt various industries, from financial services to energy, and the role of venture capital in fostering this transformation. The key takeaways from this dialogue are:</p>
<ol>
<li>The bitcoin ecosystem is maturing rapidly, with more companies emerging to innovate and build upon its infrastructure.</li>
<li>Bitcoin's superior monetary properties, such as absolute scarcity, permissionless access, and global transferability, make it the best form of money and a catalyst for widespread economic change.</li>
<li>The total addressable market (TAM) for bitcoin-related companies is immense, potentially reaching or exceeding the size of the enterprise SaaS market.</li>
<li>Traditional industries, from payments to energy, will need to integrate bitcoin to remain competitive, leading to a broad spectrum of investment opportunities.</li>
<li>Specialization and focus in venture capital, as demonstrated by 1031, offer significant advantages in understanding and capturing the value within the bitcoin space.</li>
<li>The venture capital industry has been slow to recognize the potential of bitcoin due to distractions from other crypto assets and a lack of understanding of bitcoin's fundamental principles.</li>
</ol>
<h3><strong>Links</strong></h3>
<p>Follow John on <a href="https://twitter.com/JohnArnoldTen31?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>Check out <a href="https://ten31.vc/?ref=tftc.io">Ten31</a></p>
<p>Check out <em>Bitcoin is Eating the World:</em></p>
<p>[</p>
<p>Bitcoin Is Eating the World</p>
<p>An Investor’s Case for the Biggest TAM on Earth.</p>
<p><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/size/w256h256/2023/12/TFTC_02_Black-2--1-.png" alt="">TFTC – Truth for the CommonerJohn Arnold</p>
<p><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/size/w1200/2024/01/cyberpunk_cathedral.png" alt=""></p>
<p>](<np-embed url="https://tftc.io/bitcoin-is-eating-the-world/"><a href="https://tftc.io/bitcoin-is-eating-the-world/">https://tftc.io/bitcoin-is-eating-the-world/</a></np-embed>)</p>
<h3>Sponsors</h3>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://drinksote.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/sotead.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<h2><strong>Best Quotes</strong></h2>
<ol>
<li>"Bitcoin is superior money. And there is no way that any self-interested economic actor will be able to ignore indefinitely the consequences of what that means and will be able to indefinitely not adopt and use bitcoin in some way." – John Arnold</li>
<li>"Free markets are ruthless about excess margin and inefficiency. If there's a way to take costs out of the system, if there's a way to do something that serves end users better and that an entrepreneur can profit from doing, the market will do that." – John Arnold</li>
<li>"Every company will have to become a bitcoin company to survive." – John Arnold</li>
<li>"Focus is a highly powerful lever to driving investment returns, and that's a big part of what we do, focus." – John Arnold</li>
<li>"We're just getting started, and there's a lot of work to do." – John Arnold</li>
</ol>
<h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3>
<p>The conversation with John Arnold underscores the transformative potential of bitcoin and its underlying technology. As bitcoin continues to demonstrate its superiority as a form of money, its adoption is expected to reshape industries and create new economic opportunities. The venture capital space, particularly funds like Ten31, are poised to play a pivotal role in nurturing the growth of bitcoin-focused companies. Through specialization and a deep understanding of bitcoin's attributes, these funds are well-positioned to capitalize on the burgeoning market. The future of bitcoin is not only promising for investors and companies within the ecosystem but also for the broader economy as it embraces a more efficient, secure, and decentralized monetary system.</p>
<h3>Timestamps</h3>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>7:06 - The real John Arnold<br>10:26 - John’s background<br>23:10 - Total addressable market<br>29:31 - Tech stock returns<br>34:42 - Best time to jump in<br>44:04 - Why Bitcoin is eating the world<br>52:01 - Financial services<br>1:03:06 - Consumer applications<br>1:09:06 - Replacing the incumbent system<br>1:21:48 - Venture capital not recognizing<br>1:29:57 - Ten31 network<br>1:35:07 - Bitcoin is fun<br>1:40:45 - Wrapping up</p>
<h3>Transcript</h3>
<p>00:00:02:16 - 00:00:05:03<br>Marty<br>John Arnold.  </p>
<p>00:00:05:05 - 00:00:07:22<br>John<br>Mary Beth. It's an honor.  </p>
<p>00:00:07:24 - 00:00:12:25<br>Marty<br>It's a long time coming, sir. Working together for, what, two years now?  </p>
<p>00:00:12:25 - 00:00:16:12<br>John<br>Almost close to two years. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:00:16:15 - 00:00:25:04<br>Marty<br>We're very lucky to have you on our team at 1031. I just want to say that up front, I.  </p>
<p>00:00:25:06 - 00:00:33:19<br>John<br>The feeling is mutual. Very, very bullish on what we're doing. I think it's very unique and we're just getting started. So I'm excited.  </p>
<p>00:00:33:21 - 00:00:51:11<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Before we jump into what we're here to talk about, which is the fact that Bitcoin is eating the world. You wrote an incredible piece laying out the case for Bitcoin being the largest total addressable market on the planet. But before we do that, are you the real John? John Arnold? That's the question I think we need to.  </p>
<p>00:00:51:13 - 00:01:19:02<br>John<br>My parents. My parents would say yes, but there is a slightly more famous and just slightly wealthier John Arnold out there who happens to be a billionaire. And I guess this quick background on me, I am a traditional finance refugee, starting an investment banking around a college, then went to work at the hedge fund Citadel for several years.  </p>
<p>00:01:19:02 - 00:01:44:15<br>John<br>And while I was there, I got an email from another another billionaire by the name of Ken Griffin asking to to talk to me right away. And obviously assumed, as we're all trained, to assume that that's, you know, some kind of spams in a phishing attempt. But when I referred it to our I.T. department, I was assured know it's the real Ken Griffin and you better give him a call.  </p>
<p>00:01:44:17 - 00:02:22:19<br>John<br>So I gave him a ring, and I believe he was trying to get my opinion on some gala or charity event. And I was unfortunately unable to provide any useful information to him and hung up the phone, assuming surely I'm about to be fired, checked in with his secretary to find out that he was actually looking for the John Arnold the the real one, the billionaire with whom he presumably has some kind of relationship and not the underlying John Arnold, who was, you know, a first year analyst at his firm.  </p>
<p>00:02:22:22 - 00:02:28:27<br>John<br>So that's my claim to fame at this point as being the the second John Arnold in the world.  </p>
<p>00:02:29:00 - 00:02:37:07<br>Marty<br>Well, the second John Arnold. But for a secondary like oh, Ken, Ken's like in my my work as an analyst, my pressing him.  </p>
<p>00:02:37:09 - 00:02:58:02<br>John<br>You know, generally when you're like 23, 24 and the billionaire CEO of your company wants to talk to you, it typically isn't a good thing. So my first my my first response was not positive, but turned out to be turned out to just be a mistake, an innocent mistake. So we live to fight another day.  </p>
<p>00:02:58:05 - 00:03:20:19<br>Marty<br>Yeah, that's one of the funnier stories that you have in your belt. You have a few of them. That's one of my favorites, but it's a good level setting for the context of this conversation. Obviously, you're with us at 1031. You've come full throttle into the Bitcoin ecosystem, helping back the companies that are building out the infrastructure for Bitcoin standard.  </p>
<p>00:03:20:19 - 00:03:32:24<br>Marty<br>Before we jump into the article and all that. Let's talk a little bit more about your background, what you're doing at Citadel, what you're doing before that, what you were focused on and how that applies to what you're doing now. 1031.  </p>
<p>00:03:32:26 - 00:04:02:26<br>John<br>Yeah, for sure. Post-college, like I said, I started in investment banking at Goldman. For those that don't know, that's a lot of Excel modeling, building PowerPoint decks, turning comments from, you know, senior members of your team at 4 a.m. and just trying to survive and learn, you know, the basics of kind of corporate finance. I knew I wanted to be an investor likely in the public markets.  </p>
<p>00:04:02:26 - 00:04:40:00<br>John<br>And so recruited for positions at hedge funds landed at Citadel, which had me doing a lot of investment analysis publicly traded companies. I was on health care desks focused even more specifically on medical technology and the model of a lot of those modern kind of hedge fund businesses. The big shots is to have kind of an army of people who are inch wide, mile deep, focused on very particular subsectors and trying to be the acts in those subsectors and just kind of know them better than anyone else in the market.  </p>
<p>00:04:40:03 - 00:05:05:18<br>John<br>That'll be relevant to kind of the story of what we're doing at 1031 in a second. But I did that kind of was a junior analyst working out to some extent, worked on a couple of different desks, always focused on medical technology, providing a lot of the underlying analysis for investment decisions that our desk would make for positions usually on very lean teams.  </p>
<p>00:05:05:18 - 00:05:35:16<br>John<br>So only a few people typically worked for kind of just one person above me, providing input, analytical inputs, meeting with management teams, doing channel checks and just kind of learning as much as I could about the companies in our portfolio. And so kind of built up what I think is a pretty strong muscle on just basic blocking and tackling of corporate finance and investment analysis in a public markets context.  </p>
<p>00:05:35:19 - 00:06:11:16<br>John<br>But I had always been kind of a big supporter of Austrian economics, even from high school onward. You know, you've you've talked at length. You just had the episode of Parker Lewis out about how you guys were kind of both formed by the financial crisis in a way. I was also kind of in high school at the time, right around the same age as you, and that caught my attention and made me interested in finance in a big way for the first time, but also interested in kind of what the causes of that debt crisis were and why suddenly all the smartest guys in the room seemed to not know what was going on and  </p>
<p>00:06:11:16 - 00:06:44:16<br>John<br>why we needed to take out untold levels of debt and print untold levels of money on hold for that time to bail out the system. And so that naturally led me down. The Federal Reserve rabbit hole and into kind of Austrian economics and the thesis Institute and, you know, became a big Ron Paul supporter. And so I always kind of had that vein running through kind of my intellectual life here while I was working in finance jobs.  </p>
<p>00:06:44:19 - 00:07:11:24<br>John<br>Obviously, as you would imagine, a lot of those principles are not you know, they're not orthodoxy on your your traditional finance desks typically. So didn't necessarily have a lot of opportunity to put those into practice. But, you know, over time, kind of working in those jobs, you sense like especially if you come to those jobs with the priors of Austrian economics, you can kind of sense that there there's something a little wrong, at least to say the least.  </p>
<p>00:07:11:26 - 00:07:56:00<br>John<br>There are kind of strange like short term games being played and there's kind of less and less focus on fundamental analysis and attention, less and less attention paid to what's a fundamentally justifiable valuation for a company. A lot more focus on just short termism, quarterly earnings reports or even, you know, weekly monthly moves in a stock position, focus on others positioning and kind of just increasingly trading all stocks, as you know, more or less like shit coins, just like tickers on a screen that have maybe some tenuous link to real economic realities, but like, not really that you only have that you have to like, pay attention to.  </p>
<p>00:07:56:03 - 00:08:22:05<br>John<br>So I kind of went through that career progression with those priors in mind, and you would think that that would have led me to fully grok Bitcoin much sooner. But I heard about it for the first time in 2013 in college. I think around the time that Malcolm X blew up, I knew it was kind of a it was popular among libertarians, but it seemed, you know, esoteric and scammy.  </p>
<p>00:08:22:05 - 00:08:48:08<br>John<br>And I thought my science project got probably never going to work. Then I my next touchpoint was while I was working in finance in the 2017 Bull run, got a little more interested then, but still just didn't have the conviction to fully take the plunge. And you know, obviously you're drinking from a firehose on finance desks and you have a lot of time to to drill into something that takes 100 plus hours of work to to start to get.  </p>
<p>00:08:48:08 - 00:09:19:13<br>John<br>So that didn't work either. But finally, you know, spring 2020 happened and that forced me down the rabbit hole. And after a week or two of some real diligent work, it finally clicked that this was indeed the fulfillment of the principles that I had learned from economics. This was Hayek's sly roundabout way to change the system, the monetary system for the better, in a totally peaceful, voluntary way.  </p>
<p>00:09:19:15 - 00:09:40:06<br>John<br>And so from then on I was hooked. I continue to work my hedge fund jobs for, you know, other year plus just kind of learning as much as I could about Bitcoin being in the space as much as I could, you know, much too much of my wife's chagrin, as I'm sure a lot of you know, Bitcoiners can can attest, it becomes kind of the only thing you can talk about or think about.  </p>
<p>00:09:40:06 - 00:10:22:13<br>John<br>So I went through that period, but to your point about coming from investing background around summer 2021, so after being in Bitcoin for a little over a year, kind of just started to have the intuition that if Bitcoin was going to do what I thought it was going to do and what most of people listening to this probably think it's going to do, there will be a massive kind of wave of demand behind that for companies building applications to make Bitcoin easier to use to extend its utility to both those retail users and enterprises.  </p>
<p>00:10:22:15 - 00:10:43:24<br>John<br>And because Bitcoin is money, then there's no industry that it's not going to touch and we'll get into that more. But that by itself was kind of this intuition that made me start thinking about investing in Bitcoin companies and trying to figure out a way to do that. And right around that time, 1031 popped under my radar, kind of came out of stealth.  </p>
<p>00:10:43:26 - 00:11:19:23<br>John<br>And, you know, I saw that very honest, combining traditional finance experience, you know, some of the two co-founders have experience in private equity and hedge funds. And then they were bringing, you know, you and Matt O'Dell on and, you know, you guys were formative in my orange building experience, my going down the rabbit hole. And so it just seemed like the perfect kind of shop to go try to build and stud a totally unique opportunity combining the two things you would need to be a successful investor, right?  </p>
<p>00:11:19:23 - 00:11:52:11<br>John<br>In the Bitcoin space, which is some traditional finance investing experience and deep, deep Bitcoin knowledge in Bitcoin focus. So I think I slid into Grant's DMS, you know, in like summer or fall 21 and just kind of wouldn't let up until we got on the phone. He and I started talking and I started doing some work with you guys when it, when I had a chance on the side and one thing led to another and yeah, spring of 22, I think the day that Terra Luna blew up at full time.  </p>
<p>00:11:52:14 - 00:11:53:27<br>Marty<br>Baptism by fire, maybe.  </p>
<p>00:11:54:04 - 00:12:21:02<br>John<br>Yeah, exactly. Exactly. But it was validating, too, right? I mean, it's exactly the kind of thing where, you know, a couple of years before I'd been looking at all the investment in the crypto space broadly and thinking these things look like perpetual motion machines. You know, it's there's a ton of noise. Everyone's missing the signal of remaking money of kind of digital buried value that's absolutely scarce.  </p>
<p>00:12:21:04 - 00:12:46:05<br>John<br>And, you know, that was one of the things that pulled me to 1031 with, you know, the concern and viewpoint that you guys were taking. And so I think it was appropriate that basically the day that I joined, we were kind of like vindicated in a very big way. You know, unfortunately, when one of the probably the perpetual motion machine of crypto par excellence totally blew up par excellence.  </p>
<p>00:12:46:07 - 00:13:14:21<br>Marty<br>That's again, four level setting for this conversation. It's so true. I mean, I had a very short stint in traditional finance about three years, which included two years of college, whereas working full time and taking night classes. But it was different side of traditional finance with Men's Futures Fund, your fund of funds index, commodity trading advisors. So it wasn't like a long short equity portfolio where we're diving into individual companies and looking at valuations and trying to place bets that way.  </p>
<p>00:13:14:21 - 00:13:40:04<br>Marty<br>It was more of a macro theme looking at commodities markets, and I had similar experience where I would sit there with the chief investment officers of these large commodity trading advisors, and this was in 2012, 2013, right around when Janet Yellen was taking over the helm and we were coming out of QE twist and into QE two. And I was simply asking them, like, you guys worried about all this monetary base expansion.  </p>
<p>00:13:40:04 - 00:14:12:15<br>Marty<br>They're like, No, the Fed doesn't really control markets. And I think the amount of complacency that I witness at a young age at that level of high finance, if you will, for lack of a better term, was was eye opening for me. It was like, oh, all the quote unquote, smartest people in the room really don't care about something, which I'm pretty sure we'll have an immense impact on global markets everywhere, whether it's equity, equities or commodities and other financial assets like treasuries.  </p>
<p>00:14:12:18 - 00:14:35:11<br>Marty<br>And that was really radicalizing for me in a way where I was like, wow, these nobody knows what's going on. And that's same time falling down the Bitcoin rabbit hole and really realizing, Oh, this is solution to solve all this insanity in the world, all this mispricing, we need to fix the pricing mechanism, which is the money. And that dovetails into what we're going to talk about.  </p>
<p>00:14:35:15 - 00:15:07:16<br>Marty<br>I would argue that over the last 15 years, six years now post 2008, the ability to actually go in and properly value companies has been completely distorted. Look at a p e ratio of some companies like NVIDIA above 200, which is insane. Obviously the amount of monetary base expansion and debt expansion has flown into financial assets and yes, and P at all time highs or it hit all time highs in the last week.  </p>
<p>00:15:07:16 - 00:15:27:22<br>Marty<br>I'm not sure where it is today and and check yesterday and people view that as the stock market being a barometer of the economy like oh everything's well and good but if you look at the dislocation that exist out there in terms of the quality of life that individuals have and the amount of economic pressure that your average Joe is feeling right now just does not compute with what's going on.  </p>
<p>00:15:27:22 - 00:15:57:14<br>Marty<br>So there's a dislocation. Bitcoin, hopefully some money standard will get us back to a proper pricing mechanism that will allow us to then go allocate capital efficiently and properly to to do productive things, to increase the quality of life of everybody. And then what we're doing is sort of a layer above that, like we're going to fix the money, then to do that, we have to build out infrastructure that gives people access to that money and provides them utility to do things with that money.  </p>
<p>00:15:57:14 - 00:16:22:13<br>Marty<br>So that's what we're trying to do at 1031, investing in in private company is building out this infrastructure. But before we dive into the nitty gritty of what we're doing, I think it would be a good place, a good place to start would be to just dive into the heuristic of total addressable market versus other heuristics, which you you up in the piece with these frameworks that investors use to sort of make their decisions.  </p>
<p>00:16:22:13 - 00:16:32:16<br>Marty<br>It could be value based, could be team based. But the one that unites all that you put in the piece is total addressable market. What is the opportunity we have to get a return on our capital?  </p>
<p>00:16:32:19 - 00:16:58:21<br>John<br>Yeah, absolutely. And I would say the various kind of pure risks that investors use to private investments are not mutually exclusive, right? So probably you should be evaluating a variety of things, including, you know, you have to even a great investment can actually you know a great company can't be a great investment if it's like very poorly priced.  </p>
<p>00:16:58:21 - 00:17:23:12<br>John<br>Right. So if you get in at a level that is dramatically overextended relative to kind of the free cash flow that the company can actually generate over a reasonable holding period, then even if they are indeed like a good team in a good market with a good product and, you know, competitive moats, etc., you know, the pricing of the investment can completely throw your returns out of whack.  </p>
<p>00:17:23:12 - 00:17:54:08<br>John<br>Right? So valuation is important and it's one of the things that I saw not really being kind of respected during my time at Rural Finance. So that's an important heuristic that I think will return to more and more as Bitcoin hopefully kind of resets our monetary framework. And you know, there are various other kind of ways that you can shop up and look at whether a company is an attractive investment and you should do all those different things.  </p>
<p>00:17:54:10 - 00:18:41:17<br>John<br>But the point that I make in the beginning of the piece, as you point out, is pretty much every investor kind of regardless of whether they're just trying to buy, you know, the cheapest things possible and hope that they can kind of get a pop in a relatively short time, just as valuations. Correct. Or whether they're hyper focused on growth and in the most cutting edge technology that they can find or, you know, anything else everyone needs to and has to inevitably pay attention to TAM, as you say, total addressable market, because for a given probability of success of the investment and for a given quality of a team and for a given level of  </p>
<p>00:18:41:17 - 00:19:06:01<br>John<br>scalability of a company using unit economics, the huge lever that will differentiate between all of those pulling them all kind of equal is just how big is the prize that they're actually targeting, right? You can think of it on one extreme, one extreme end of, you know, a local kind of, you know, contractor doing work around like his hometown.  </p>
<p>00:19:06:03 - 00:19:36:08<br>John<br>That may be like an absolutely great business. And probably we need like a lot more of those. We need more skilled tradespeople and electricians than we have in this country for reasons that you talk about in other episodes of this podcast. But there's naturally kind of a ceiling on how much revenue that business is going to generate and thus also, you know, how much cash flow it can it can generate, which is ultimately what you have to care about when making an assessment on whether you're going to make an investment or not.  </p>
<p>00:19:36:10 - 00:20:08:07<br>John<br>And so as you ramp up the the addressable market, the shots on goal, the the size of the customer base that a company is selling into you, you've lever up and you ratchet up the impact of the team and the impact of scalability and you know, the impact of the profitability for a given business with a 20% profit margin that can max out at, you know, $1,000,000 of revenue right?  </p>
<p>00:20:08:10 - 00:20:30:27<br>John<br>Okay. Well, you get $200,000 of profit off that. If you can scale those same economics with that same team to, you know, $100 Billion market, just by having just by addressing a bigger opportunity, you've already you've dramatically levered up and scaled up the price that you can pay for the investment to make sense and the amount of free cash flow that it can generate.  </p>
<p>00:20:30:29 - 00:20:51:14<br>John<br>And so as I point out in the piece, like TAM is not the only thing that matters by any means. And in fact, certainly there are kind of more traditional VC early stage investors that have gotten way too focused on kind of like pie in the sky tam numbers and said, I can pay pretty much any multiple that that I want.  </p>
<p>00:20:51:14 - 00:21:10:06<br>John<br>I can I don't have to care about, you know, time to revenue generation or time to profitability because it's just this company is addressing $1,000,000,000,000 market, $100 trillion market. And so you can throw out these wild numbers and even at a very low probability of success, you can convince yourself that, you know, something is maybe a great investment.  </p>
<p>00:21:10:14 - 00:21:38:07<br>John<br>So that's not the way that we need to go. And again, I think as capital gets more expensive, as easy money goes away, that kind of thinking will go away. But there's still significant value as you differentiate between investments in looking at how big is the actual opportunity set, because that's going to, at the end of the day, you know, to bring it back to kind of like, you know, Boomer Warren Buffett language like your margin of safety goes up.  </p>
<p>00:21:38:10 - 00:22:02:16<br>John<br>Yes. You're addressing a much, much bigger market than someone else. You just have more shots on goal to drive revenue, more potential customers and a bigger total pie that you can sell into and maybe, you know, take share up. Right. You know, would you rather have 10% of $1,000,000,000,000 market or, you know, 50% of $100 million market rate?  </p>
<p>00:22:02:19 - 00:22:27:06<br>John<br>So the just gaming that ratio in your favor by addressing the biggest markets possible is, I think, a major lever of investment success that pretty much any investor, regardless of kind of their stripe and what they focus on in terms of methodology, needs to pay attention to. And you know what every investor out there who's paying cash, Pashtu.  </p>
<p>00:22:27:09 - 00:22:56:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah, in this piece Bitcoin is even the world was obviously a play on software. Is he in the world? I mean you mentioned explicitly in the piece by Marc Andreessen from A16z Anderson Horowitz. And I think to set the context for the Bitcoin conversation and it is important to go back and look at the last wave of innovation that led to insane returns for investors, which is obviously the transition to digital age and the companies that really capitalized on that.  </p>
<p>00:22:56:29 - 00:23:11:04<br>Marty<br>So you have a great chart here of the investment returns of the core for Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, juxtapose the S&amp;P gold in long bonds over a 20 year time horizon. And it is pretty insane when you look at it.  </p>
<p>00:23:11:06 - 00:23:31:29<br>John<br>Yeah, absolutely. I mean, this is you know, I kind of acknowledge in the piece like this is not going to be surprising to anyone who looks at it. I think if you've been paying even the slightest amount of attention to if you have, you know, a retirement account, if you have any kind of like portfolio and, you know, increasingly, you know, no one has been able to really save and just in dollars in a bank account.  </p>
<p>00:23:32:02 - 00:24:05:02<br>John<br>So we've all had to kind of pay more attention to this right over the last ten, 20, 30 years. I think everyone intuitively knows this is the case, right, That FAANG stocks broadly, these massive tech leaders, what are now being called like the Magnificent Seven, are really holding up a lot of a lot of the S&amp;P and are explaining a lot of, you know, overall stock market returns because and part of that is because of, you know, monetary base expansion, that it's kind of deleterious consequences and forcing people to apply more premium to them.  </p>
<p>00:24:05:09 - 00:24:44:21<br>John<br>But there's also there's also real dramatic economic value that's been generated by the right like there's a reason that these companies are in the position that they're in. It's because one of the main reasons is because they were leading infrastructure providers at the forefront of a radical secular shift in the way that commerce operates. Right. The materialization of communication and information storage and transfer through Internet enabled software was, you know, the highest leverage are among the highest leverage innovations and inventions in human history.  </p>
<p>00:24:44:29 - 00:25:18:25<br>John<br>And people obviously needed tools and applications and services to fully avail themselves of the benefit of that. Right. And so the companies that you see on that chart, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon and several others that we can think of, one by positioning themselves as market leaders, providing those services. And, you know, obviously the the path to get here is is is strewn with, you know, some corpses of companies that were once their competitors that that didn't quite make it.  </p>
<p>00:25:18:25 - 00:25:49:11<br>John<br>And some of those companies just got bought by the few companies that you see on that chart. But nevertheless there was very clearly tremendous value generated even before the crazy kind of multiple expansion of the last 5 to 10 years by the bellwether companies that enabled mass, both retail and enterprise use the primitives of the Internet protocol stack and of, you know, consumer software, right.  </p>
<p>00:25:49:14 - 00:26:16:17<br>John<br>And so, you know, Andriessen, as you referenced, wrote his piece in 2011, software is eating the world to kind of encapsulate that point, that exact point, that this is a massive secular shift. And the companies that were driving it were set to even in 2011, there were still a lot of low hanging fruit to be collected. The companies that were picking that low hanging fruit were set to drive massive returns for investors.  </p>
<p>00:26:16:19 - 00:26:41:06<br>John<br>And that did right. The difference, I would say, with his piece versus kind of where we are right now with Bitcoin is in 2011, right like the iPhone had been around for years. Android followed shortly after Facebook had been around, I think seven years. I think hundreds of millions of users. At that point, Netflix was already doing streaming and that was clearly picking up steam.  </p>
<p>00:26:41:08 - 00:27:05:27<br>John<br>Amazon had like pretty much already already, you know, signed the death warrant for, you know, physical bookstores and a lot of physical retail. So he wasn't really saying anything like highly controversial. Yeah, maybe like, you know, capital allocators weren't fully paying attention and maybe they were still somewhat underweight tech. But in reality, like your grandma was already on Facebook in 2011, right?  </p>
<p>00:27:05:27 - 00:27:27:12<br>John<br>Like it was becoming a fairly consensus viewpoint, but we're said it where we're seeing that Bitcoin today is, you know, we're 15 years ahead, probably 15, 20 years ahead of where Andriessen was when that piece was written. The theme is just as powerful and I would argue even more powerful, but it is far less consensus at this point.  </p>
<p>00:27:27:15 - 00:27:37:22<br>John<br>And that means that the asymmetric upside is orders of magnitude greater. So that's a reason to be excited, I think, about what we're doing.  </p>
<p>00:27:37:24 - 00:28:05:09<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I mean, when you were going through that, the the fact that the competitors came, when it went throughout time in the tech sector, I couldn't help but think I always thought that Jeeves was going to is going to make it and compete with with Google. But I guess I mean I completely agree we're much earlier in Bitcoin's lifecycle compared to when Andriessen wrote his piece in 2011 where the tech cycle was then.  </p>
<p>00:28:05:12 - 00:28:11:08<br>Marty<br>And I guess that gets into the question of timing. Can you be too early in this?  </p>
<p>00:28:11:11 - 00:28:35:21<br>John<br>Yeah, I mean, that's that's a key like lesson to learn in investing is that, you know, being being early is tantamount to being wrong. So there are definitely situations where in my own career I've been kind of right on the investment thesis over like a 12 to 24 month period, but you very wrong in like a three month period.  </p>
<p>00:28:35:23 - 00:28:56:01<br>John<br>It's a timing is very important. What I would say though is I think what we discovered over the couple of years, I guess four years now since the drone was launched, a couple of years since I joined is, you know, we people always say in Bitcoin that, you know, the the best time to buy Bitcoin was yesterday. The second best time is today.  </p>
<p>00:28:56:03 - 00:29:21:02<br>John<br>I actually think the flipside is true for bitcoin infrastructure. You know a few years ago even Bitcoin still had not gone through as many stress tests as it has today. Lightning was still, you know, even more immature than it is today. And certainly I think it's still quite early for lightning, but there were very few companies even really building on it at scale.  </p>
<p>00:29:21:04 - 00:29:52:06<br>John<br>And we multisig was still fairly new, Unchained was still having to really beat the drum on just even using collaborative custody at all. Now you can see like some real indications that those things have shifted significantly. We've had a lot more stress tests since, you know, five or six years ago. Blocksize wars tax, the China mining ban and a variety of other things.  </p>
<p>00:29:52:06 - 00:30:17:14<br>John<br>You know, yet another 80% plus price drawdown. I think that's for now in Bitcoin's history, maybe 35. And so we're at a point now where there's a greater degree of maturity in the ecosystem, in the builders, in the ecosystem. And in just the last couple of years, we can say, you know, anecdotally and I think we might have actually put out some data on this in a prior piece that we wrote.  </p>
<p>00:30:17:14 - 00:30:49:01<br>John<br>But the number of companies coming to market with really interesting solutions is inflecting. I don't have the numbers off top of my head, but there have been far more Bitcoin deal, Bitcoin only deals done in the last few years, even amidst kind of the carnage of the VC, carnage of 22 and 23 than the last couple of years probably, you know, combined the deals that we've that we've seen in the market overall that vastly outstrips the total deals done in the ten years prior.  </p>
<p>00:30:49:01 - 00:31:25:28<br>John<br>Right. So I think we're entering the stage where the technology stack the ecosystem, the companies and the quality of companies are mature enough and have progressed to the point where you would have been to early like five years ago probably. I don't think we're too early anymore. I think we're at exactly the right time to lean into this thesis, especially heading into a period of the next famine coming up, and 11 major criminal finance institutions now having put their imprimatur on Bitcoin being an investable asset for institutions.  </p>
<p>00:31:26:01 - 00:31:46:00<br>John<br>You and I might not care about that that much. And I know I will not be owning the ETFs and I highly recommend everyone listening to this choose a collaborative custody option like what Unchained offers or, you know, another option like that where you can actually own real underlying Bitcoin while also not having to take on the complexity of key management.  </p>
<p>00:31:46:07 - 00:32:05:26<br>John<br>But that said, it's still very meaningful that the biggest asset manager in the world has now filed for this ETF. And Larry Fink, the head of that asset manager, has changed his tune in just a few years time from Bitcoin is a tool for criminals, is an index of money laundering. It has no intrinsic value it makes no sense to.  </p>
<p>00:32:05:27 - 00:32:30:28<br>John<br>It's a tool. It protects you. It's it's there in case your your government tries to censor you or it's there to protect you against monetary debasement. You know, suddenly he sounds like, you know, Ron Paul like ten or 15 years ago. Right. He's kind of parroting those same lines. And I don't I think we shouldn't understate what that means for institutional awareness of and acceptance of an adoption of Bitcoin and what it will mean over the next 5 to 10 years.  </p>
<p>00:32:30:28 - 00:32:54:13<br>John<br>And so I look at all that and I say, okay, no, we are not too early. Like this is just the right time where the asymmetry is still there, the alpha is still there, people still don't fully get why Bitcoin is differentiated and why these opportunities are exciting, but they're starting to wake up. The ecosystem is significantly more mature than it was even just a few years ago.  </p>
<p>00:32:54:20 - 00:33:05:04<br>John<br>And so we're at a really good kind of balancing point where we're not too early, we're not too late. And I think it's exactly the right time to be leaning into investing in these companies.  </p>
<p>00:33:05:06 - 00:33:36:29<br>Marty<br>I completely agree. Having been around Bitcoin for ten years, the maturity of the space over the last five years particularly has been amazing to see. And you couple that with the macroeconomic tailwinds that are coming our way, not only is the fiscal situation here in the United States utterly dire, it seems that the banking crisis that we experienced last year is probably just a Band-Aid over and lurking right under the surface, ready to pop up at any time.  </p>
<p>00:33:36:29 - 00:34:04:03<br>Marty<br>And then you have the culmination of geopolitical events that have happened over the last few years where the U.S. has weaponized the dollar system, seized Treasury assets, and you have other large players in the geopolitical realm beginning to form alliances that that seem like they could attempt to erode the sanctity of the U.S. dollar as a global reserve asset.  </p>
<p>00:34:04:03 - 00:34:28:10<br>Marty<br>And you mentioned the ETFs getting approved. And I think another thing socially, I mentioned earlier, like people really feeling the pressures of inflation in their everyday lives is beginning to stoke that that question in the common man's mind, like why is this happening? Why can't I live a higher quality of life like I was just able to five, six years ago.  </p>
<p>00:34:28:13 - 00:35:03:02<br>Marty<br>And naturally that that question will will lead them to the solution which is Bitcoin. And once they come to understand it, which I think that's another part of the thesis here, is that think as it stands today in 2024, there's never been more of a wealth of a knowledge base built out for people to easily learn what Bitcoin is, why it's important, and you have different educational materials for the different types of archetypes of people in the way in which they learn.  </p>
<p>00:35:03:08 - 00:35:45:09<br>Marty<br>So I think timing is perfect. We've got another having coming up. We were just in Nashville last week and I think that is I mean, obviously I've been hyper focused on mining for the last six years, but I do think that is one of the first big dominoes to falls once the energy sector really notices and leans into the benefits that Bitcoin mining as a an alternative revenue stream, a grid balancer, or in a way to be more efficient with your your stranded assets once that light bulb goes off in the energy sector and they lean in heavy, I think that's a massive domino that begins to spread and make it obvious that Bitcoin is  </p>
<p>00:35:45:09 - 00:36:11:06<br>Marty<br>here to stay. It's it's a net benefit for humanity and there's going to be a lot of activity. Companies spun up people saving in Bitcoin. It's going to get really cool. And I think I've never been more excited. It is daunting. Ten years, many cycles, as you can see on my face. And look, I'm only 32. I probably look like I'm 42.  </p>
<p>00:36:11:08 - 00:36:13:02<br>Marty<br>I've seen a lot, but.  </p>
<p>00:36:13:05 - 00:36:15:03<br>John<br>I would I wouldn't have put you into over 28.  </p>
<p>00:36:15:05 - 00:36:42:11<br>Marty<br>Oh, thank you. Thank you. Um, but not the timing feels feels good. And I think the fact that that Bitcoin has survived these waves and it just really reinforced the value prop of the network, the peer to peer distributed cash system, the hard supply, and the fact that hashrate has gotten to the level that it is and been distributed geographically as it has over time, I think it's you.  </p>
<p>00:36:42:12 - 00:36:58:19<br>Marty<br>You'd be an idiot not to recognize that there's something here. But the fallback to sort of the the underlining first principles of why this is important like wise Bitcoin eating the world like in your mind.  </p>
<p>00:36:58:22 - 00:37:37:27<br>John<br>Yeah, for sure. The the simplest answer is bitcoin is superior money and there is no way that any self-interested economic actor will be able to ignore indefinitely the consequences of what that means and will not be, and will be able to indefinitely not adopt and use Bitcoin in some way. The I go through kind of the properties that make Bitcoin secure money in the piece and like a little table, it's probably something that, you know, if you've been in this space for a little while and you've seen a version of it, if you're newer to the conversation, you know, we can walk through it together.  </p>
<p>00:37:37:27 - 00:38:00:03<br>John<br>It is right there. I highly recommend just kind of taking a second to step through it, informed by people who have been in the space for a while, as well as just offering economics and kind of principles there. But these various properties kind of lead you to the inevitable conclusion that Bitcoin is the best money we've ever had.  </p>
<p>00:38:00:05 - 00:38:24:27<br>John<br>And as 1031 advisor Parker Lewis famously, at least famously, for those who are in the Bitcoin space, wrote in the piece on Bitcoin obsolete all our other money. Money converges to one, right? You don't want to hold ten monies where your money A is like your best one. We also hold some of money which isn't quite as good and it doesn't hold value as well.  </p>
<p>00:38:24:27 - 00:38:45:12<br>John<br>And it's not as liquid and salable, but still okay. And when we see etc. like no, you will always trade the inferior monies. You always tend to trade the inferior monies as much as possible for the superior money. Even in the world that we live in today, you can look around and say, well, every sovereign nation has, you know, just about every sovereign nation has its own currency.  </p>
<p>00:38:45:14 - 00:39:06:02<br>John<br>And we're kind of in this world that topical, you know, partial barter between these currencies, which is like reintroduce the double coincidence of once the problem money was introduced to solve. And so you could say, well, you know, we haven't converged to one, you know, in the last 50 years since the start of the Fiat regime, like is it really true that one, convert it to one?  </p>
<p>00:39:06:09 - 00:39:44:22<br>John<br>But the reality is that the world settlement asset is the dollar, right? You can have, you know, these little fiefdoms that have their own currencies that they've made up that they kind of manage. But at the end of the day, the dollar has the dominant network effect. And if given the choice and you see it around the world right now with the emerging stablecoins, especially people right now want dollars thanks to the petrodollar system which you've talked about on this podcast, a good amount and we have reason to believe is is crumbling partially for the reasons that you pointed out, which is that the US has really shown in the last few years that it  </p>
<p>00:39:44:22 - 00:40:04:15<br>John<br>will debase and seize your dollar denominated assets and your U.S. Treasuries at will if it if it wants to. And that's just one of the reasons that that system is kind of crumbling. But for now, the dollar is the big dog. There are not ten big dogs. There are not ten major kind of reserve assets for the world that people want.  </p>
<p>00:40:04:15 - 00:40:33:22<br>John<br>Above all else. There's one and it's a dollar. Our thesis is that that will inevitably change over who knows what the time frame is ten years, 20 or 50 years. But it will shift to being Bitcoin for the reasons that we outlined this piece about Bitcoin spare monetary properties. Bitcoin is absolutely scarce, so it will be the best store of value over time.  </p>
<p>00:40:33:25 - 00:41:07:21<br>John<br>That's enforced by a decentralized consensus of self-interested actors that cannot be easily gamed. It's permissionless to interact with its digitally native barer value that can be sent globally 24 seven very, very difficult, if not impossible to censor, at least for any meaningful amount of time. And capital controls are not effective against it. And so everyone, as knowledge distributes, every person on the earth will want to increasingly get more Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:41:07:24 - 00:41:33:23<br>John<br>We've seen that in history with kind of the emergence of gold as the global reserve asset up until the point at which gold no longer scale for global commerce. It naturally, spontaneously evolved as the world reserve asset and sell an asset across a bunch of different highly diverse societies around the world and at different points in history because everyone wanted the best money.  </p>
<p>00:41:33:26 - 00:41:56:14<br>John<br>Gold was for a long time, the best money were now living in this fiat experiment that has for about 50 years disrupted that, and the seeds of that were sown by gold's failures and its spatial limitations and its inherent ability and its difficulty to take custody and move around. But that experiment, as you've referenced, is is probably not long for the world.  </p>
<p>00:41:56:16 - 00:42:26:19<br>John<br>It's creating significant instability and political pushback in different pockets of the world in different ways. And it will be ultimately impossible for any corporation or any government to force people to value the dollar or any fiat currency more than they value Bitcoin. They might be able to for a time mandate usage. They might be able to enact certain laws that make using Bitcoin more burdensome.  </p>
<p>00:42:26:21 - 00:42:51:17<br>John<br>But, you know, as MI6 points out, in theory of money and credit, they can't make people subjectively value a currency, right? So the properties that make Bitcoin superior will inexorably pull people around the world to use it until to use it and store wealth. It until the point at which everyone in the world is using Bitcoin as their reserve asset.  </p>
<p>00:42:51:19 - 00:43:18:18<br>John<br>And oh, I can, I can stop there. But I would say there are two major implications of that that I think people who are even constructive on that thesis, people who even already own Bitcoin, whether you're an institutional allocator and you have some allocation of Bitcoin or you're just a pleb on Twitter, your stack SATs every day, both of those types of investors, both those types of savers will kind of only go that far and then stop.  </p>
<p>00:43:18:20 - 00:43:51:02<br>John<br>But if that's true, then it has two big implications, one of which is the picks and shovels, if you want, that will enable people to acquire Bitcoin, use it, store it safely, put it into lightning channels, spend it, ensure it, distribute it's custody, you know, whatever you want, all these different kind of applications that we can get into will naturally be booted up and will be required ultimately for that distribution process to take place.  </p>
<p>00:43:51:02 - 00:44:23:24<br>John<br>So for everyone, if everyone in the world is ultimately going to own and use Bitcoin, they will be doing that partially with the help of applications and service providers and tools developed by companies that are providing UX that allow them to do that with a ten x, 100 x better user experience. Some of that will be certainly free open source software that people can just download and run without any sort of connection to a company.  </p>
<p>00:44:23:26 - 00:44:44:23<br>John<br>But there will also be corporate service providers like Unchained or Anchor Watch or Strike or any other company that you see in our portfolio that can provide that can and will provide a better experience that will be demanded by the market as people look for ways to acquire and use Bitcoin. So they kind of go hand in hand, right?  </p>
<p>00:44:44:29 - 00:44:58:02<br>John<br>If you're bullish on Bitcoin's adoption, then you necessarily have to be bullish on it's picks and shovels too. So that's implication one, we can maybe unpack that or however you want to take it. We could have an application to maybe a second.  </p>
<p>00:44:58:04 - 00:45:18:04<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it's digging in. Implication one. I mean, you mentioned many of the different companies that are providing these tools and services to be able to reap the utility and the benefits of Bitcoin. But let's get a little more granular and better define the subsectors and the verticals that you think are addressing these different needs.  </p>
<p>00:45:18:07 - 00:45:42:05<br>John<br>Yeah, So I'll give you the way that we kind of cut it out, a temporary one, but this is not the only way to think about this space. And there's also obviously overlap between a lot of these. But the first most obvious one is, you know, to go back to Parker Lewis, you know, if Bitcoin is money, I think he wrote this in some piece ready to talk.  </p>
<p>00:45:42:05 - 00:46:25:28<br>John<br>But Bitcoin is money. The first order of product of money is financial services, right? So that's kind of the if you think about the addressable verticals in like concentric circles expanding out, one of the first center, the concentric circles is financial services products that allow you to save in Bitcoin effectively to custody it, to have obviously to to buy it as well, to buy it and treat it as necessary to take out loans against it and do anything else that involves interacting with the traditional fiat system and doing those interactions between traditional fiat system and Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:46:25:28 - 00:46:52:06<br>John<br>And so, you know, a few examples of a company like that would be obviously Unchained is one. They provide a lot of those services and we're kind of the forerunner in building kind of those services. It helped building out collaborative custody to allow a user to benefit from a, let's say, the benefit of a custodian without actually surrendering to custodial permission.  </p>
<p>00:46:52:06 - 00:47:32:07<br>John<br>So in a two of three multisig I as a retail or I as a company can hold two keys on chain, can hold one, and thereby eliminate the risk of eliminate or greatly reduce the risk of catastrophic loss. If my private keys, if my harbor walls are compromised. Right. They also provide kind of intuitive trading and lending services on top of that on one interface so that I can interact with my Bitcoin more in the way that I would be kind of used to doing if I'm coming from the traditional finance or fiat world, which ultimately like definitionally everyone is right, everyone's kind of coming from that world.  </p>
<p>00:47:32:13 - 00:48:12:21<br>John<br>And so a company that can provide a way to much more safely custody the Bitcoin and then also use it in these different ways that people are familiar with is highly valuable and very necessary to. Right. It's it's necessary for most people to have something like that to bridge from, you know, not just buying Bitcoin and leaving it on Coinbase, you know, having their Coinbase IOU or having their ETF IOU as as will increasingly be the case for for many people as their first kind of touchpoint in Bitcoin, but also not have to immediately make the leap to, you know, holding generational wealth on a hardware wallet in their desk or bearing in the ground  </p>
<p>00:48:12:21 - 00:48:54:27<br>John<br>somewhere right? Those are those are two ends of the spectrum that people are naturally uncomfortable with when they come to Bitcoin. And so having a collaborative custody option that also gives them the ability to interact with Bitcoin in ways that they're familiar with from a finance perspective is highly valuable and very important. And now we're also seeing, you know, you've bang the drum on this a lot over the last year or so, Multi-institutional Multisig So not just not even only having a relationship with Unchained, but having a two of three relationship with Unchained or on ramp or Egg Watch or various other kind of custody providers that we can talk about who form a quorum  </p>
<p>00:48:54:27 - 00:49:25:01<br>John<br>for you and allow you to interact with Bitcoin without ever actually having to touch private key material, which is necessary for a lot of institutions and enterprises that might want to use Bitcoin as a Treasury asset, but have fiduciary responsibilities that prevent them from being allowed to have the discretion over private material. Obviously, there's more of a trust tradeoff there, but it's trust distributed across three institutions rather than just a single point of failure.  </p>
<p>00:49:25:04 - 00:49:49:04<br>John<br>And for those who are listening, I would highly recommend reading Dhruv Bansal's piece from Unchained on building a network of keys, a network of designers. And I think that that principle will become very important to real institutional adoption of Bitcoin. And to our point earlier, that's an example of something that was not even on anyone's roadmap 3 to 4 years ago, right?  </p>
<p>00:49:49:06 - 00:50:11:26<br>John<br>It's only come about because of advances in Multisig and understanding of Multisig and getting more institutions kind of on board for that. And so that's an example of how a lot can really happen in a very short time. And a lot has happened to put Bitcoin and Bitcoin companies in a position to really bring mature offerings to market.  </p>
<p>00:50:11:26 - 00:50:18:21<br>John<br>So that's a lot. Just financial services. And I would you quickly run. Yeah.  </p>
<p>00:50:18:23 - 00:50:47:28<br>Marty<br>Well I was going to I was going to say I would add with Unchained particularly, not only do they have the technical expertise to manage and create the software to manage these these multi-site quorum, so they also understand the asset as well and the financial side and the cyclical nature of Bitcoin's price history. And on their lending products specifically, I think this really shines through where they have extremely low LTV, which most people look at and like, Oh my God, that's pretty insane.  </p>
<p>00:50:47:28 - 00:51:21:09<br>Marty<br>But they understand the asset, the team understands the asset and they know that they're going to be a lot of volatility. So they have a low LTV to reduce the amount of liquidity and they never had a loan loss throughout their five plus years of offering this product. And when you juxtapose that like leaning into two to the 1031 horn here, a disclaimer for this episode, obviously 1031 is invested in a lot of the companies we're talking about, but I think Unchained shines through because we were getting made fun of four for quote unquote missing the Blockfi wait wave a few years ago.  </p>
<p>00:51:21:09 - 00:51:53:24<br>Marty<br>They hit a $4 billion valuation at the peak of the 2021 or 2022, and we made the conscious decision like, we don't trust the way that they're they're running their their lending product. It doesn't make any sense to us. And that proved to be a wise decision at the end of the day to allocate towards Unchained, which was much more conservative, having a fine understanding of the asset and the volatility that comes with the Bitcoin price and blockfi, which tried to apply this fiat model to the Bitcoin standard.  </p>
<p>00:51:53:24 - 00:52:00:03<br>Marty<br>And there's no lender of last resort in Bitcoin and if you lend it out, somebody lose it. You're not getting it back.  </p>
<p>00:52:00:05 - 00:52:26:28<br>John<br>Yeah, absolutely. It's a great point. Not having any loan losses on a product like that through two bear markets and the carnage that we saw in 2022 multiple times with and then blockfi then at the end of the year. Right. Like to, to make it through all of that with no loan losses. It's just really testament to what they built and also testament to just focus on Bitcoin and the importance of that.  </p>
<p>00:52:27:00 - 00:53:09:01<br>John<br>That's true for all the companies in our portfolio right? It's not just an ideological theme where we're we're Bitcoin maxes and so we only want to invest in people who are ideologically aligned. You could say that's like there's relevance to that. And I think that's a it says something about you as a founder. If you have kind of made the jump to understanding why Bitcoin is a sphere of money that will obsolete all of the money, but even more importantly just from an investing perspective, there's significant edge in understanding the asset that you're dealing with and the things that can go wrong with the volatility that Bitcoin experiences.  </p>
<p>00:53:09:08 - 00:53:35:15<br>John<br>If products like Bitcoin backed loan product is not structured well in terms of conservative LTVs and non rehab application of the underlying collateral, right? So that's just a feather in the cap, not just for Unchained, but for every business that is exclusively focused on Bitcoin because that is, that drives a real commercial edge and real sustainability to the business that I as an investor care about.  </p>
<p>00:53:35:15 - 00:54:03:08<br>John<br>Even independently of some sort of ideological viewpoint on Bitcoin versus any other cryptocurrency. But to to just quickly round out on your other question about the verticals that we look at, the others would be that are major ones would be kind of lightning and layer two. That's something like a strike or mutiny wallet, very different kinds of the spectrum of what they provide that those are leveraging lightning to do really innovative things.  </p>
<p>00:54:03:10 - 00:54:27:27<br>John<br>I would say also it's not even our focus is not even so much on lightning as such, although that's the only real like layer to protocol that is battle tested and has existed for, you know, five plus years. So we've done a lot in lightning, but I think I say lightning slash layer two because we are open to the idea of new protocols coming along that could also have commercial viability and commercial use cases.  </p>
<p>00:54:28:04 - 00:54:51:03<br>John<br>You might call, you know, it's like controversial perhaps what you might call experiment protocol, right? Like a layer two in some way. I know, again, like there's some disagreement on if that's the right way to approach that. But it is kind of an additional protocol that, you know, only really came about in the last couple of years that extends Bitcoin's utility and provides kind of new ways to interact with Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:54:51:03 - 00:55:15:01<br>John<br>And you're seeing that with what fairly is spinning up. And, you know, famously kind of you and Odell were the ones that spoke very into into existence. And I let you speak on that a little but if you want but also now muni wallet, like I mentioned on the lightning side, also doing a lot with the payment protocol to kind of carve out their own use cases in their own niches.  </p>
<p>00:55:15:01 - 00:55:37:18<br>John<br>And so that that also speaks to what you were asking earlier about whether it's too early or not. Like Ferryman is a great example of that, of just the vibrancy that we're seeing in the ecosystem over the last couple of years. And because these are open source protocols, a lightning company can very easily kind of integrate very many capabilities in some way or financial services company.  </p>
<p>00:55:37:18 - 00:55:58:26<br>John<br>You can integrate lightning or, you know, you can have all these kind of cross vertical pollination in a way that you really can't in closed source tech stacks or kind of more broadly diversified VC portfolios where you're investing in fintech and insurer tech and health tech and all these different kind of things that don't really talk to each other, play with each other.  </p>
<p>00:55:58:26 - 00:56:29:17<br>John<br>So, you know, that's kind of the second major vertical. Again, I said A round it out quickly and I failed to do that. But take your time. I'll just say quickly, you know, consumer applications are maybe the next one. So something like primal or fold or, you know, Bitcoin gaming plays, all of those are kind of using Bitcoin in ways that talk to and, you know, make sense with existing consumer use cases.  </p>
<p>00:56:29:20 - 00:56:58:28<br>John<br>They're not necessarily about Bitcoin, but they're more akin to using Bitcoin as a means to an end to drive consumer engagement and establish consumer behaviors. So social does you know, rewards. Obviously rewards is I don't have the number stuff in my head, but a massive category that merchants spend billions of dollars on every year and fall is focused on using Bitcoin to create interoperable rewards much more valuable to consumers.  </p>
<p>00:56:59:01 - 00:57:23:13<br>John<br>You've got Primal, which is obviously a noster client. Noster is itself not just an utter client, but a master client and tech stack. But Noster itself is, you know, another kind of protocol which some have maybe call it a layer three. I don't really like that classification, but whatever. But it's one of these other kind of edge protocols that can naturally directly interact with Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:57:23:13 - 00:58:00:19<br>John<br>As you know, it's an open source communications protocol interacting with an open source money protocol. Right. And so that's that's another good example of like replication. And then you also the last two would be kind of mining infrastructure. And so that's prop mining plays like actual companies that are doing self mining grid being an example of that, and then also just picks and shovels around mining value added services and technology to allow miners to gain advantage or to power themselves off power sources that would otherwise be inaccessible.  </p>
<p>00:58:00:21 - 00:58:22:08<br>John<br>So upstream data is an example of that. Also Giga Energy, but both of whom are really seeing a lot of great uptake among oil and gas producers, something that you've talked about a lot on the show and we think is going to be a huge theme, which maybe we can talk about a little more as it relates to the way that Bitcoin was slowly kind of spread out and hit the world and get these other industries.  </p>
<p>00:58:22:10 - 00:58:47:24<br>John<br>And then, you know, last vertical, I would say would be security infrastructure. So that's any hardware or software that enables either a single user or institution to securely and or privately interact with Bitcoin. The most obvious example of that being coin tight and, you know, the gold card, the taps or the various products they have to make that accessible for everyone.  </p>
<p>00:58:47:24 - 00:59:14:27<br>John<br>And that's another good example of, you know, five years ago those products were substantially less advanced than they are now. Taps on or didn't exist. Gold Card was several iterations earlier, and they've made a variety of improvements since then that have kind of turned that product into the gold standard for for interacting with Bitcoin securely and privately in a way that any random web can go access.  </p>
<p>00:59:15:00 - 00:59:45:18<br>John<br>So yet another example that we're exactly at the right point to start investing aggressively in these companies, we're hitting the point at which to or to paraphrase Andresen in his software piece, he said, we're finally at the point where all of this technology can be delivered to consumers at scale around the world, where we're maybe not exactly like right there at that spot yet with Bitcoin, but we're very close and want to be investing in these companies.  </p>
<p>00:59:45:18 - 01:00:06:29<br>John<br>When you can see the contours of that taking shape, not when it's already happened and you're kind of just saying what everyone's already right. So there's still a lot of alpha to be generated in investing in these types of companies. It's a long winded response, but that's the general kind of heuristic I guess I would use to carve up the overall infrastructure.  </p>
<p>01:00:07:01 - 01:00:40:07<br>Marty<br>Yeah, as there's a lot to go down. That's why I love about the team we've assembled at 1031 because obviously I have experience on the mining side of things. That's heavily focused on privacy, lightning, Napster, freedom, tech, more broadly yourself. Grant Jonathan, really understand the financial services side of things, and I think we complement each other extremely well, which allows us to go do a lot of these interesting deals and explore the full breadth of the industry as it's forming.  </p>
<p>01:00:40:07 - 01:01:07:04<br>Marty<br>And the going back to the mining stuff like that is again, coming off the tails of the Energy mining summit in Nashville. The one thing that interests me about the mining place specifically is it's somewhat of a proxy play on energy more broadly, which I think is going to be a massive theme over the next decade as it's becoming abundantly clear that we've completely bought the energy systems of the world to a certain extent, it needs to be fixed.  </p>
<p>01:01:07:04 - 01:01:31:17<br>Marty<br>There's going to be a lack of supply in a lot of areas, which is naturally going to drive up prices, and these companies are going to be looking to create efficiencies and off grid mining on grid mining for that matter as well. Both provide alternate revenue streams are just going to be desperately needed by these energy companies. But then going on that too, like the rewards play with fold just makes sense.  </p>
<p>01:01:31:21 - 01:01:51:07<br>Marty<br>Why would you lock somebody into some company ship token? We can just give them bitcoin rewards. They can spend that anywhere. Financial services. I think they're going to get more robust as people begin to hold more Bitcoin for longer periods of time and you have it in the piece, yet the hodl waves that prove that that is happening.  </p>
<p>01:01:51:10 - 01:02:00:10<br>Marty<br>So yeah, I think the timing is ripe and now we just spent like 30 minutes on the application. One What's application to do you remember. Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:02:00:12 - 01:02:25:27<br>John<br>Yeah. And I, I, I got it. Yeah. I mean putting a pen, an application one, it's basically, there's probably $1,000,000,000,000, I'm throwing out a number but I think it's something like that, $1,000,000,000,000 of revenue opportunity just in the picks and shovels, if you want to call it that, of the enabling technologies that will see tremendous demand on the back of growing Bitcoin adoption.  </p>
<p>01:02:25:29 - 01:02:58:15<br>John<br>And it's it's both just the companies that exist today with the capabilities Bitcoin already has. But it's also, you know, the companies that will emerge on top of this current generation of, you know, innovators. Right. I think I think about something like I put in the piece like a Shopify, $100 billion plus market cap business or, you know, Salesforce or ServiceNow or you can think of a bunch of different kind of tech businesses are not in like the Magnificent Seven but are still like very, very valuable and do billions of dollars of revenue.  </p>
<p>01:02:58:17 - 01:03:41:13<br>John<br>Those couldn't have existed like 20 years ago. You needed prior advancements in bandwidth and networking and server architecture as well as just like the distribution of like high speed Internet and the growth of like consumer computing devices to enable something like e-commerce. Right? But once you have all of those things in place and you have the capability for e-commerce, then now you can build a business like Shopify and there will be more businesses coming down the pipe just in kind of the picks and shovels category of Bitcoin companies that couldn't have existed without work being done by like the current innovators that we're seeing today.  </p>
<p>01:03:41:21 - 01:04:02:16<br>John<br>So that will continue to be, you know, it's not just like what's the opportunity right now for the companies that exist today. It's also a question of what are the companies today going to enable that will allow for some totally, you know, a possible use case use case that's impossible today, but will be very mainstream within kind of Bitcoin picks and shovels in ten years.  </p>
<p>01:04:02:16 - 01:04:28:25<br>John<br>Right. So that'll compound of that. That'll be in our community kind of by itself over the next couple of decades. That's implication one generally the picks and shovels are going to do great. I think application too is what we like to say at 31 is just like every company had to be an Internet company had become an Internet company over the course of the last 20 years to survive and to stay relevant and to thrive.  </p>
<p>01:04:28:27 - 01:05:05:24<br>John<br>So every company will have to become a Bitcoin company to survive. The kind of reasons for that and the drivers for that are multifold. You No. One is that as those Bitcoin picks and shovel providers start to gain traction, start to build real businesses, the ones that are touching those kind of inner parts of the concentric circles of Bitcoin verticals will start to naturally disrupt things like payments, infrastructure, right, and financial services, which we just talked about and asset management.  </p>
<p>01:05:05:26 - 01:05:38:14<br>John<br>And you know, I think it shouldn't be understated how revolutionary digital buried value that's absolutely scarce that can be instantly settled anywhere around the world at any time. How radical how radical of a paradigm shift that is relative to the Rube Goldberg machine of the chain of, you know, credits and IOUs and counterparty risks that are required to make, you know, a single transaction at a supermarket work right?  </p>
<p>01:05:38:22 - 01:06:08:25<br>John<br>There's so much fixed cost built into that. There's significant delays in settlement. There's armies of accountants and technicians and lawyers kind of holding that all together with duct tape. And that's how, you know, the traditional payment system is built. And over time, you know, the history of economic development, I guess the arc of history bends toward technological innovation, winning.  </p>
<p>01:06:08:28 - 01:06:38:22<br>John<br>Now the arc of history bends toward, as Jeff Bezos said, you know, your margin being my opportunity. Free markets such as we have them, maybe they're not as robust as we as we would like in the US today, but they're still still operating to some extent. Free markets are ruthless about excess margin and inefficiency. And if there's a way to take costs out of the system, if there's a way to do something that serves end users better and that an entrepreneur can profit from doing, the market will do that.  </p>
<p>01:06:38:24 - 01:07:03:29<br>John<br>It's just a question of what it takes. And, you know, payments, infrastructure and financial services are kind of like the first industry in the crosshairs of Bitcoin picks and shovels, companies that will develop and start to kind of encroach on their territory, right, Because they're providing end users a better, more cost effective, more secure way to make payments to custody assets, etc..  </p>
<p>01:07:04:01 - 01:07:30:15<br>John<br>And so when you think about an application, that's kind of the first way it plays out is incumbents look at that growing trend, which is an inexorable trend. If you believe that Bitcoin adoption is is inexorable and it will grow to everyone in the world, they'll look at that trend and say we need to either integrate Bitcoin in some way, we need to, you know, develop capabilities on our own or we need to buy some of these companies.  </p>
<p>01:07:30:15 - 01:07:58:28<br>John<br>Right. We think, you know, at 1031 that the option that a lot of incumbents will choose is to be strategic acquirers to avoid kind of being the victims of the melting ice cube of watching their businesses evaporate. But there will also be, you know, forward thinking companies, forward thinking blue chips that you know, maybe do have the ability to kind of develop in-house.  </p>
<p>01:07:59:01 - 01:08:26:03<br>John<br>But either way, what you will effectively see is more incumbents of traditional industries needing to integrate Bitcoin in some way and becoming Bitcoin companies. And so that expands the service area for what you can invest in as as an investor focused on Bitcoin infrastructure. The the other thing to consider is I guess I would say just to put a little more detail on that, it's not just speculation, right?  </p>
<p>01:08:26:03 - 01:08:57:06<br>John<br>Like we're already seeing it with a variety of companies, even outside of you're seeing it in payments, you're seeing it in your services. But even expanding outside of that to some of these further the rings that are further out in the concentric circles right. Oil and gas, power, utilities, like you mentioned, Bitcoin mining is getting substantially more integrated into those industries in a way that, you know, was very much on display as as you mentioned in at the National Energy and Mining Summit last week.  </p>
<p>01:08:57:09 - 01:09:46:02<br>John<br>There are senators that are kind of seeing that connection. There are major energy executives on both the grid utility side and also on the regulatory side and the oil and gas side that are seeing that the synergy between Bitcoin mining and what they do and trying to leverage it. So that's already playing out and it's not surprising because it's exactly what we saw happen, you know, with the Internet, logistics companies, manufacturing companies, medical device companies, you know, all had to start leveraging Internet capabilities if they wanted to compete with both upstarts, you know, start ups that were kind of doing something interesting with Internet enabled software in their industries and also their more forward thinking  </p>
<p>01:09:46:02 - 01:10:16:05<br>John<br>incumbent competitors that were either buying those companies or trying to develop similar solutions in-house. Right. And so if Bitcoin is just as or more influential to global commerce as the Internet, then you would expect to see the exact same with companies in every industry. And, you know, like I said, we're already seeing at some of the points in the portfolio and maybe the most kind of exciting implication.  </p>
<p>01:10:16:07 - 01:10:48:07<br>John<br>So the implication of that, I guess for us as investors is when we see companies like Stat News, we have an A portfolio, a non Bitcoin company see the power of Bitcoin and what it might be able to do for their business over the long term and come to us to invest in them and to give them some guidance on their Bitcoin strategy and to have us on the cap table because we're aligned with seeing the way that the world is going to go with Bitcoin adoption.  </p>
<p>01:10:48:10 - 01:11:30:25<br>John<br>And so that's an example of, you know, an early example of something that I think we'll see a lot more over the next ten years is nine Bitcoin companies of various different sizes kind of, you know, pre-seed stage startups and Series B series C companies that are about to go public looking at this trend and deciding they need to find ways to integrate Bitcoin in some way, whether that's lightning micropayments for like a consumer application or whether that's, you know, heavy industry companies looking at ways to they're going to use bitcoin mining like you've referenced, we you know that will dramatically open up service or even further for investors who are focused on on the  </p>
<p>01:11:30:25 - 01:11:37:08<br>John<br>space. And you know, I put some numbers around it at the end of the piece. It's it's virtually impossible to call that up.  </p>
<p>01:11:37:08 - 01:11:38:07<br>Marty<br>Well.  </p>
<p>01:11:38:10 - 01:12:09:23<br>John<br>Yes. You know, it's a little I don't want it to be, you know, moon math or kind of pie in the sky thinking. But if everything that I've just said is right, is Bitcoin adoption is going to do what we think it's going to do, if it's going to lead to, you know, $1,000,000,000,000 plus of new value created by picks and shovels, providers and is itself also that's going to lead incumbents to look for ways to integrate Bitcoin in their own industries, All of which I think is kind of, you know, follows from just being superior money.  </p>
<p>01:12:09:26 - 01:12:39:10<br>John<br>If that's the case, then Bitcoin infrastructure will capture some percentage of the revenue generated by all those industries that need to start integrating Bitcoin. It'll enter their value stack in some way or they'll just be disrupted and the revenue streams will be replaced by companies that are leveraging Bitcoin. And so with just all the just the set of industries that I talk about specifically in the piece, obviously this is not even, you know, all the industries in the world.  </p>
<p>01:12:39:10 - 01:13:13:21<br>John<br>These are just the ones that are kind of the most obviously impacted by Bitcoin. You know, with 1% revenue penetration, you can get to like, you know, $100 billion in category revenue for kind of Bitcoin companies. This is a very like high level rough heuristic way to kind of think about the opportunity. But it gets at the intuition that because Bitcoin is money and monetary technology will affect every industry in some way, there is no commerce at any scale that can avoid tapping into and being touched by monetary technology.  </p>
<p>01:13:13:24 - 01:13:32:17<br>John<br>Bitcoin will have a role somewhere in the value stack of all those industries and even more. And so once you start to take that seriously, you have to ask yourself, even at very low penetration of those revenue streams. And to be clear, like in financial services and payments in oil and gas, like I think the penetration is going to be a lot higher than 1%.  </p>
<p>01:13:32:20 - 01:13:54:04<br>John<br>What does that mean for the available revenue? What does that mean, like the TAM? Right. To go back to the beginning of our conversation of this category of companies and, you know, it puts them even at a conservative estimate, you know, around like the size of enterprise SAS Enterprise SAS is like a 200 to $300 billion revenue category annually.  </p>
<p>01:13:54:08 - 01:14:15:01<br>John<br>And so at fairly penetration of even just a select few of the most obvious industries that should be disrupted by Bitcoin or should be affected by Bitcoin in some way, you're basically asking a process level because Bitcoin gets to play across all of these different verticals because it's money, because this is monetary technology that everyone needs in some way.  </p>
<p>01:14:15:03 - 01:14:21:27<br>John<br>So as you know, as Andreasen says, that's the big opportunity. That's where we're putting our money.  </p>
<p>01:14:21:29 - 01:14:32:20<br>Marty<br>I mean, I thought I was bullish after helping you edit read the piece then read again after you published, but hearing you articulate it in person just got me even more bullish. It's pretty insane.  </p>
<p>01:14:32:22 - 01:14:37:10<br>John<br>Yeah. I mean, no one is bullish enough, right? But it's also.  </p>
<p>01:14:37:13 - 01:15:07:29<br>Marty<br>And so I think with all that in mind, like we've talked about the trend of incumbent companies adopting a Bitcoin strategy, why do you think the incumbent venture capital space has not seen this? And why do you think even within the broader crypto venture capital space, this thesis hasn't been recognized and there's a relatively small pool that we're playing in at 1031?  </p>
<p>01:15:08:02 - 01:15:37:09<br>John<br>Yeah, absolutely. I think it's a couple of things up until 20 to 22 when you finally had the wash out of a lot of the froth of zero the and observe and a lot of which was in kind of the altcoin industry. Part of the reason, I think, was because venture capitalists, you know, looked at altcoins as this unprecedented opportunity to get quick liquidity.  </p>
<p>01:15:37:09 - 01:15:59:04<br>John<br>Right. You can in the market where literally every asset that's not tied down is just constantly going up in value. And you can always underwrite like someone's going to come pay me two X or five x or ten x multiple for, you know, this round that I'm doing right now. Someone's going to come work me up or, you know, there's just money sloshing around and I can I can find a buyer somewhere.  </p>
<p>01:15:59:06 - 01:16:24:13<br>John<br>There's, you know, there's, first of all, minimal incentive to diligence in the long term viability of any project because it's it's all kind of a greater fool game. But I think specifically with crypto in DC, there was this unprecedented opportunity to pull forward liquidity events, right? Normally in venture capital, you know, when you're making an investment, it's it's a liquid.  </p>
<p>01:16:24:15 - 01:16:43:10<br>John<br>You know, your investment timeline could be anywhere from three years to five years to seven years to like ten years. Right. And, you know, ideally, if you make good investment selection, you're compensated at least on a few of those investments with, you know, outsized ten x 20, 600,000 X type returns. But it takes a long time to get there.  </p>
<p>01:16:43:13 - 01:17:11:10<br>John<br>And there's there's kind of like the purest form of VC is like the ultimate low time preference game where it should be. But in the last few years, again, up until the the wash out of 2022, you had a lot of VCs able to get, you know, liquidity in like six months by funding some token project and taking a big allocation of a pre mined or just an allocation of, you know, founder tokens, right.  </p>
<p>01:17:11:13 - 01:17:39:04<br>John<br>And then listing those publicly somewhere on some exchange and hiding it, spending some amount of money to hype them up, having a good marketing team and you know, selling those I'll say to to retail aggressively and for some retail investors that maybe out a little bit if you timed it exactly right. But for most that was probably not a good trade, but it was generally a great trade for for the VCs that had the pre mines.  </p>
<p>01:17:39:04 - 01:18:09:13<br>John<br>Right. And you know, it allowed them to operate with to have kind of the return profile of a venture capital fund with the time horizon of a hedge fund, which is a compelling argument. If all you care about is kind of very short term fiat gains and not kind of building a long term business and, you know, investing for where the world is going, not just kind of where it is right now, kind of right at the tail end of observer, Right.  </p>
<p>01:18:09:16 - 01:18:43:12<br>John<br>So that was one of the big things that I think led to substantial distraction in DC space, which just like you can't do that with Bitcoin right this time I'm at 21 million Bitcoin. You there's no way to game a bitcoin company such that you can, you know, go sell a bunch of pre-made tokens to do retail. And so if you're going to invest in a company that's building on Bitcoin, you have to be willing to invest for at least a few years, right?  </p>
<p>01:18:43:15 - 01:19:29:12<br>John<br>I do think we will have some exits in our portfolio within the next like 3 to 5 years, but there will be some that take longer. And in any case, like we will be unlikely to have, you know, 5000 next market event in the next month from, you know, a pre mine that we kind of drove. And so if if that's what you're optimizing for I can see why you would only focus on kind of you know crypto schemes as we saw you know as we predicted at 1031 and, you know, as we structured ARC an investment thesis to express this theme, but that all ultimately blew up to significant kind of reputational damage to  </p>
<p>01:19:29:14 - 01:19:48:27<br>John<br>some of the investors were involved me, the founders who were involved. And you know, also beyond reputational damage, like if, if you were not the winner of the musical chairs game, then you're sitting there with a really big markdown and a lot of zeros to take back to your lips. So that worked out ultimately, kind of as we thought it would.  </p>
<p>01:19:48:27 - 01:20:08:04<br>John<br>It was, as I said, like a musical chairs game that could be played for a little while but was not ultimately sustainable. But it was, I think, a huge distraction and a huge source of noise for any crypto. We see that otherwise it might have taken the time to look at where the space is actually going over the next ten years.  </p>
<p>01:20:08:04 - 01:20:43:26<br>John<br>Right now. So that's the first big thing. The other thing I think is Bitcoin is a big paradigm shift in thinking for anyone who comes from a traditional finance background. We referenced this a little at the beginning, but yeah, you generally like when you're operating in kind of a fairly short termist, Keynesian influenced mindset and that's how you've been taught in college and all of your colleagues around you think the same way and that's how you have to play the, the game that you're in professionally.  </p>
<p>01:20:43:28 - 01:21:08:09<br>John<br>It actually it's like it's not profitable for you on a day to day basis to step back and ask yourself the question of what is money right? That's like a huge distraction. It takes 100 plus hours to even start to kind of grok the underlying problems that money is trying to solve. And then another thousand hours to understand like why Bitcoin is money and how it works and everything.  </p>
<p>01:21:08:12 - 01:21:33:28<br>John<br>If you're from a background where 2% inflation is good because because economists say so, and that's the sign of a growing economy. And that's just like an axiom that you take for granted. It's very difficult for you to kind of step back and evaluate what would actually make good money and where Why actually does money need to lose value progressively over time?  </p>
<p>01:21:34:00 - 01:22:10:06<br>John<br>And why why do we have a central bank issuing money ex nihilo to greater and greater degrees every every year? Right. So I think part of it is just there's a need to step back and do work that traditional finance roles don't necessarily incentivize you to do so for the people who are early to that process and take the time and get pulled down the rabbit hole early, you know, there's there's alpha to be generated.  </p>
<p>01:22:10:06 - 01:22:48:23<br>John<br>There's there's an asymmetry in kind of being first to that to the conclusions that would follow from asking those questions. Just like there's a symmetry to, you know, just owning Bitcoin initially, you know, before before the rest of the world catches on. So there is also asymmetry to owning equity in Bitcoin companies. Before most crypto investors or traditional VCs understand the implications of Bitcoin being money and what it means for their investments in, you know, other crypto projects and what it also means for their lack of exposure to Bitcoin infrastructure companies.  </p>
<p>01:22:48:26 - 01:23:15:19<br>Marty<br>Yeah, extremely well put. And I think beyond that, like I think what we're doing a 1031 to, to pump a pump around chest here I think again since we're bitcoin I think that's a it's becoming clear in the broader VC market as if you have a thematic fund focused on a very niche market. It's probably more advantageous for you.  </p>
<p>01:23:15:21 - 01:23:43:27<br>Marty<br>But I really like what we've done with Grant, Jonathan, Matt, myself, you have done to really imbue the nature and the ethos of Bitcoin on what we're doing with our with our tribe events, really trying to communicate, hyper communicate with LPs to let them know what's going on in the portfolio and then getting the portfolio companies themselves to speak with each other, to do some knowledge share to figure out how they can work with each other, because that's another unique.  </p>
<p>01:23:43:27 - 01:24:06:01<br>Marty<br>Part of what we're doing at 1031, the portfolio that we've developed is a lot of the companies you didn't even mention explicitly, but you're talking about Unchained. They work with Code Card, They work with them pulled out space to an extent as their block Explorer. There's many other synergies across the portfolio that the can materialize because you're building on this open source protocol.  </p>
<p>01:24:06:03 - 01:24:16:29<br>Marty<br>It's so early and so investing in one company, you can help out another company in the portfolio as they can collaborate and sort of raise each other's boats.  </p>
<p>01:24:17:02 - 01:24:42:04<br>John<br>Yeah, absolutely. And like I said, you know, I referenced this earlier, I think a little bit, but you don't get that opportunity to benefit from those synergies if you are like a broad, diversified investor, you know, early stage investor, ABC Investing in pretty much every vertical out there and kind of taking a spray and pray approach to not just every vertical, but also the many companies populating those verticals right.  </p>
<p>01:24:42:06 - 01:25:23:04<br>John<br>And so I think that's you know, I reference this earlier, it's kind of the very beginning, but like there's there are huge returns to specialization and focus, even if you're a capital allocator out there, kind of hearing this message and thinking, you know, being somewhat skeptical of some of our conclusions about money or about Bitcoin as money, you know, there's no denying, I think that, like I mentioned earlier, the citadels, the millenniums, values and etc., of the world that have kind of gone to this highly focused multi-manager framework where you have very smart investors going into wide mile deep on very particular sectors, you know, has generated outsized returns for those strategies.  </p>
<p>01:25:23:10 - 01:25:56:01<br>John<br>And I think it's no different here. You can't overstate the power of being highly hyper focused on one very particular theme, which for us is Bitcoin and Bitcoin infrastructure, both because it makes you understand that the companies building on that better than anyone else. So you can identify what looks promising and what doesn't, where the weak points might be, where the opportunities might be better and faster than anyone else, but also because it gives you just the best network that you could possibly have.  </p>
<p>01:25:56:04 - 01:26:25:19<br>John<br>Many of the companies in our portfolio, you know, are exclusive to us because you and Matt and Grant, Jonathan, have just developed relationships with some of the founders over years and years. And when, you know, smart developers finally just kind of wanted to put pen to paper and build out an idea into a company, like they came to us and said like, Hey, I want you to be the only investor on cap table because I know you and I learned a lot from you In the case of you and Matt.  </p>
<p>01:26:25:21 - 01:26:57:08<br>John<br>And I know we're aligned and I've gotten a ton of advice from you in the past, and so let's just do it. You guys will be the only one of the cap table. You don't get that by being highly diversified, right? You don't get by having, you know, a sleeve that invests in Solana and a sleeve that focuses on the Ethereum ecosystem and a sleeve that you know does some other random like tech vertical integrated with them, like a $100 billion portfolio that's invested in some other things.  </p>
<p>01:26:57:08 - 01:27:28:06<br>John<br>Right? You get that by being hyper focused and on the ground all the time with the the smartest people who are pushing the space forward. So again, as I just think about like, you know, whether you care about the Federal Reserve, whether you care about, you know, Bitcoin as money or not, you know, I would just consider, as you're looking at the space you know, ask yourself who's best positioned to if we're right about this to benefit the most from it and to make the best investment selections within.  </p>
<p>01:27:28:06 - 01:27:56:04<br>John<br>This theme is it someone who spends 1% of their time per year kind of casually thinking about the space and trying to arrange some calls with founders whenever he can? Or is it someone who is entirely obsessively focused on this and lives and breathes it every single day? You know, 24 hours, seven a week? Basically, I think that the questions to kind of answer itself focus is a highly powerful lever to driving investment returns.  </p>
<p>01:27:56:04 - 01:27:58:28<br>John<br>And that's a big part of what we do focus.  </p>
<p>01:27:58:28 - 01:28:07:06<br>Marty<br>It's important. It's important for us, the companies. It's beautiful thing, It's fun. Are you having fun, John?  </p>
<p>01:28:07:08 - 01:28:14:18<br>John<br>I am having fun. It's it's a great time waking up and doing Bitcoin stuff all day is a dream come true. It's a ton of fun.  </p>
<p>01:28:14:21 - 01:28:39:17<br>Marty<br>Well, there's a big leap of faith for, you coming from Citadel. You could have rode that train pretty far. Uh, came to a somewhat upstart venture fund in the Bitcoin space in 1031 at a time when the market was blowing up. What's the first two years working full time in the space been like? Reflecting right now or introspection?  </p>
<p>01:28:39:19 - 01:29:12:04<br>John<br>Yeah, I mean, it should tell you a lot about my conviction, right? Like, yeah, you know, just I wouldn't just of jump for any opportunity. I really do think temporary one's very unique. I think you know if you look at what we've done just in the last two years, deploying over $100 million, the space the biggest portfolio in the space, like I mentioned, a ton of our investments are exclusive because of the relationships we built up over the last ten plus years with with you and Matt and the Grant Jonathan as well.  </p>
<p>01:29:12:07 - 01:29:37:26<br>John<br>And I think it's just fully validated. The last two years have fully kind of why I made the decision I made and made me even more kind of bullish about the opportunity that I see out of us. The ecosystem is, like you mentioned, even more vibrant than I expected it to be, kind of when I was, you know, on the outside looking in, paying attention as much as I could to companies and the builders in the space.  </p>
<p>01:29:37:28 - 01:29:57:10<br>John<br>You know, that was not enough to help me fully appreciate how much development and how much innovation there actually is and how quickly it's moving. When you're focusing on it every day, you really see that, you know, front and center. And so that's all been very validating. But yeah, I, I think, you know, the proof is in the pudding.  </p>
<p>01:29:57:10 - 01:30:12:15<br>John<br>Our work speaks for itself. And, you know, I think there's $1,000,000,000 plus of deployment opportunity out there in just the next few years in the space that we can go tackle and that we plan to tackle. So excited.  </p>
<p>01:30:12:18 - 01:30:53:05<br>Marty<br>Yeah. What excites me to like this morning we sent out that letter to FinCEN and cosigned by a lot of the companies in our portfolio. And that's that's one thing that gives me incredible joy. Obviously working with people like you, Matt Grant and Jonathan is incredible, but then obviously continuing to develop relationships with the people, the builders, for lack of a better term, creating the infrastructure that is going to lead us to a Bitcoin standard has been extremely rewarding and to add to that, like I do think the people that are building out this infrastructure right now are in it to win it, number one, but get it as well.  </p>
<p>01:30:53:07 - 01:31:20:04<br>Marty<br>I think the cosigning of that letter to FinCEN was indicative of that, that people understand the gravity of the situation that exists in our world right now, that things are terribly broken. We need to to fix them. And people have formed companies and are building tools to go fix the world. And it there's obviously a large enormous economic opportunity as you laid out in Bitcoin is eating the world.  </p>
<p>01:31:20:04 - 01:31:42:10<br>Marty<br>But that's the other thing when you can marry that economic opportunity with a a drive for virtue in the world, which I believe all the companies in our portfolio are doing, it's just a very special thing. And I feel very fortunate to be on this journey with you, with everybody else at 1031 and everybody else in the portfolio.  </p>
<p>01:31:42:12 - 01:32:27:18<br>John<br>Yeah, no, no doubt. Yeah. I would be remiss if I didn't mention, you know, when I as I as I said, kind of at the start of this conversation, you know, growing up 15, 16, 17 year old kid into Ron Paul and into ending the Fed and preserving, you know, civil liberties in the US and kind of returning the country to some of the principles on which, you know, I think it was founded I was really disillusioned with the prospects for that over kind of my time going to college and then going into internal finance roles, not necessarily because there's anyone particularly I mean, certainly I think there are executives in the space and some  </p>
<p>01:32:27:18 - 01:32:56:28<br>John<br>of those companies that are actively working against all of those principles. But more than anything, I just you know, you kind of encounter like a degree of apathy about any of that. And, you know, I think it's been very invigorating to see both my coworkers. 1031 you guys, but also, like you said, all the founders that I work with that we work with are also very driven by, in most cases, those principles.  </p>
<p>01:32:56:28 - 01:33:24:17<br>John<br>And and sometimes in some cases, certainly we disagree. There's not, you know, ideological homogeneity among the portfolio by any means, but where it matters and where it counts, the people that we invest in are very, very highly principled. And yeah, I shouldn't understate how unique that is. And frankly, I also think on the long term, on a long term basis, that that drives investment returns too.  </p>
<p>01:33:24:21 - 01:33:37:21<br>John<br>So it's a it's a double edged benefit for us both the financial case long term of the winning in the world and also just what it means for the types of founders that we get to interact with.  </p>
<p>01:33:37:24 - 01:34:02:28<br>Marty<br>Yeah It's a beautiful thing. John. This piece was incredible. If you haven't read it yet, you're listening to this. Go read, go read it. We'll link to it in the show notes if you want to find out anything more, we're doing it. 1031 Find us at 1031 dot V.C. Before we wrap up here, is there anything we didn't cover or mention that you think we should get out to the freaks before we wrap up here?  </p>
<p>01:34:03:01 - 01:34:33:13<br>John<br>Yeah. You know, the last thing I'll say is, just like, I think we all see a temporary one. Like, there's a degree of humility required in being, like, an investor. Like, none of us know exactly where the space is going to go over the next couple of years. I don't think, like, you know, Freddie, that we mentioned earlier like that as much as you and that we're kind of on the forefront of kind of speaking that whole project into reality and really marketing it and getting the right people in the right rooms to, you know, bring it forth.  </p>
<p>01:34:33:15 - 01:34:52:20<br>John<br>You know, none of us necessarily saw that coming like only a couple of years ago. And there will be things like that in the next couple of years where we're like, you know, things develop in a certain way a lot faster than maybe we expected or, you know, a new like scaling initiative happens, you know, in terms of like a soft fork or a new layer to protocol.  </p>
<p>01:34:52:20 - 01:35:12:13<br>John<br>It's that opens up really interesting new possibilities. Like all those things are possible. And I think, you know, the I guess the sign of a good investor is someone who has like strong convictions, weakly held. You know, we have the ability to kind of look at the landscape and see it evolving and have the humility to know, like we can't plot out like exactly way that everything is going to go.  </p>
<p>01:35:12:17 - 01:35:42:04<br>John<br>We certainly have some opinions, and I think many of our convictions will be proven correct over the next ten years or so. But what I would say is I'm just really excited to be in a position where we have a unique position to see those changes kind of as they unfold like we're on the ground at the King Park and the Bitcoin commons, you know, with the founders and the devs and the really intelligent people who are making those changes and pushing things forward and innovating.  </p>
<p>01:35:42:07 - 01:36:00:22<br>John<br>And so, you know, we have humility, the humility to know that we don't exactly know everything's going. But I think we are uniquely positioned to kind of be there when those inflection points happened and kind of see the big changes. But before almost anyone else is looking at the space. So, yeah, that's what I close with.  </p>
<p>01:36:00:25 - 01:36:08:08<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it's perfect. Close with John. It's been a pleasure. We're going to do this quite often moving forward, you know?  </p>
<p>01:36:08:13 - 01:36:09:12<br>John<br>Yeah. I mean.  </p>
<p>01:36:09:14 - 01:36:28:04<br>Marty<br>We need to break you out from what we've been. We've been hiding, John. Like in a corner. Not in a corner, but like, Hey, this guy's got too much alpha, but it's a it's been a pleasure working with you. The way you approach what we're doing at 1031, your consummate professional, I think you really accelerate what we what we're trying to do here.  </p>
<p>01:36:28:04 - 01:36:40:02<br>Marty<br>And it's I feel very fortunate to be able to work side by side with you and meet up in different cities around the country, around the world, even just yeah, go push Bitcoin forward.  </p>
<p>01:36:40:05 - 01:36:46:16<br>John<br>Appreciate it, man. Totally, totally agree. Still, he's mutual and there's a lot of work to do, so we're just getting started.  </p>
<p>01:36:46:18 - 01:36:49:09<br>Marty<br>Yeah, that's what we got today for this piece of love You.</p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:image href="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/475-John-Arnold.png"/>
      </item>
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Banks Without Bankers | Eric Yakes]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[The TFTC episode delves into the potential of Bitcoin and its underlying technology to revolutionize the banking industry by creating banks without bankers.]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The TFTC episode delves into the potential of Bitcoin and its underlying technology to revolutionize the banking industry by creating banks without bankers.]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 16:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iobanks-without-bankers/</link>
      <comments>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-iobanks-without-bankers/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qqnxsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7cnpde4hxtthd96xsmm4wskkyctwddjhyue0qgszsfr2amdk0jnmy5qukevqmspvky4s9j4va50h9xakr9wsv2cs3tgrqsqqqa28kj0kfc</guid>
      <category>TFTC Podcast</category>
      
        <media:content url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/473-Eric-Yakes.png" medium="image"/>
        <enclosure 
          url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/473-Eric-Yakes.png" length="0" 
          type="image/png" 
        />
      <noteId>naddr1qqnxsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7cnpde4hxtthd96xsmm4wskkyctwddjhyue0qgszsfr2amdk0jnmy5qukevqmspvky4s9j4va50h9xakr9wsv2cs3tgrqsqqqa28kj0kfc</noteId>
      <npub>npub19qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksn4zc3g</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrib]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/banks-without-bankers/">Read original post</a></p>
<h1>Key Takeaways</h1>
<h2>Core Topics, Themes, and Insights</h2>
<p>The TFTC episode delves into the potential of Bitcoin and its underlying technology to revolutionize the banking industry by creating banks without bankers. Marty and his guest, Eric Yakes, author of "<a href="https://www.amazon.com.au/7th-Property-Bitcoin-Monetary-Revolution/dp/0578902621?ref=tftc.io">The 7th Property: Bitcoin and the Monetary Revolution</a>," discuss how Bitcoin's open-source protocol and the layers being built on top of it enable new means of financial interactions that could eventually replace traditional banking systems.</p>
<p>One of the key topics covered is the concept of "FediMints" or federated mints, which are essentially decentralized platforms that allow users to exchange Bitcoin for eCash tokens. These tokens can be used for private, efficient transactions, operating on a trust model that leverages multi-signature technology and cryptographic protocols to minimize risk and optimize agency problems historically associated with banks.</p>
<p>Additionally, the podcast touches on the importance of self-custody and how service providers like River encourage it through their products. The conversation also examines the role of new technologies such as the Lightning Network, liquid networks, and FedMints in scaling Bitcoin and reducing reliance on traditional financial systems.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the episode acknowledges the anniversary of Hal Finney's prescient post about Bitcoin enabling a free banking system and how current developments are bringing that vision closer to reality.</p>
<h2>Links</h2>
<p>Follow Eric on <a href="https://twitter.com/ericyakes?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>Check out <a href="https://www.axiombtc.capital/banks?ref=tftc.io"><em>Banks Without Bankers</em></a></p>
<p>Check out <a href="https://www.amazon.com.au/7th-Property-Bitcoin-Monetary-Revolution/dp/0578902621?ref=tftc.io"><em>The 7th Property: Bitcoin and the Monetary Revolution</em></a></p>
<h2>Sponsors</h2>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<h2>Best Quotes</h2>
<ul>
<li>"We have this open-source protocol and all these layers being built on top of it that enable completely new ways of interacting with money and financial services." - Marty<ul>
<li>Context: Marty emphasizes the innovative potential of Bitcoin's technology stack beyond just fitting into existing financial systems.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>"Can we really have a future where we have banks without bankers?" - Marty<ul>
<li>Context: Marty poses a critical question that challenges the traditional concept of banking and opens up discussion for decentralized alternatives.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>"I think that a lot of the debate comes from, is it like there's this binary way that we're going to be thinking about our financial system... Or is this actually more of a spectrum of trust models?" - Eric Yakes<ul>
<li>Context: Eric suggests that the future financial ecosystem built around Bitcoin may not be a simple dichotomy but rather a spectrum involving various trust models.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>"The goal of Bitcoin... is I think it needs to be a settlement layer for a neutral monetary system." - Eric Yakes<ul>
<li>Context: Eric discusses his vision for Bitcoin as a fundamental layer for a new, politically unbiased monetary system.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>"Imagine a system where users dollar cost average into Bitcoin via Arc, use federated technology for custody, and eCash as the private cash balance for everyday transactions." - Eric Yakes<ul>
<li>Context: Eric paints a picture of a future financial ecosystem that fully leverages Bitcoin and associated technologies.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The podcast episode with Marty and Eric Yakes presents a nuanced perspective on how Bitcoin's protocols and emerging technologies like FediMints have the potential to disrupt traditional banking systems. The discussion highlights the importance of self-custody, the role of trust models, and the vision for a decentralized, neutral monetary system that can operate without the need for bankers.</p>
<p>While the conversation acknowledges the current momentum of Bitcoin ETFs and their mainstream appeal, there is a strong undercurrent of belief that the true transformational change lies in the development of native Bitcoin technologies that empower individuals and reduce reliance on centralized financial institutions.</p>
<p>The episode concludes with a reflective message that, despite regulatory challenges and the complexities of new technology, the movement toward a Bitcoin-driven financial future is gaining momentum, and the community must prioritize building out self-sovereign systems to preserve Bitcoin's freedom-enabling properties.</p>
<p>In summary, the podcast not only provides valuable insights into the current state of Bitcoin and its integration with the financial world but also posits thought-provoking ideas about its future trajectory, urging listeners to engage with and contribute to this evolving space.</p>
<h2>Timestamps</h2>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>6:40 - Can we really have banks without bankers?<br>12:44 - Tradeoffs<br>16:10 - Fedimints<br>23:48 - Federated model cost/benefit<br>35:23 - Implementing incentives<br>42:08 - Fedi in the future<br>45:53 - Speculating on possibilities<br>51:35 - Mint distribution and crossing chasms<br>59:23 - Ark<br>1:07:57 - Spoiling final thoughts<br>1:11:31 - Multi-institution custody<br>1:15:03 - ETF<br>1:22:59 - Falling empire<br>1:25:46 - Wrapping up</p>
<h2>Transcript</h2>
<p>00:00:01:23 - 00:00:33:18<br>Marty<br>Suffixes. Boy Marty bent here in another episode of Tootsie on a momentous day in Bitcoin's history. ETFs officially started trading. Everybody is making fun of Vanguard and others who are blocking people from buying the Bitcoin ETFs. We're here with Eric Yates to talk about something that's actually cool replacing the banks with Bitcoin. Eric is the author of the Seventh Property Bitcoin in the Monetary Revolution, and he recently wrote a post for Axiom Banks Without Bankers.  </p>
<p>00:00:33:20 - 00:00:58:17<br>Marty<br>And it's actually also fresh in that we're talking about this today, Eric, because it's the anniversary of the running Bitcoin or the day after the anniversary of the running Bitcoin tweet by Hal Finney and how Finney is known in the space for writing a very prescient blog post, our forum post Bitcoin Talk talk on December 30th, 2010, talking about how Bitcoin would enable a free banking system.  </p>
<p>00:00:58:22 - 00:01:06:10<br>Marty<br>In your piece really dives into how we can do that natively on Bitcoin. So first, welcome to the show. Thank you for joining us.  </p>
<p>00:01:06:12 - 00:01:09:09<br>Eric<br>Yeah, thanks man. It's been a long time coming.  </p>
<p>00:01:09:11 - 00:01:32:19<br>Marty<br>Really has. And I'm very excited we waited this long because I think this particular topic is fascinating, important in flying under the radar right now as the narrative with the ETFs is that bitcoin's merging with the incumbent financial system is going to become a part of the banking system, the financial system, and it's just going to fit in to what has already been built.  </p>
<p>00:01:32:23 - 00:01:52:29<br>Marty<br>And a lot of the people that are pushing this narrative, in my opinion, are completely neglecting the fact that we have this open source protocol and all these layers being built on top of it that enable completely new ways of interacting with money in financial services. And this is really what you dove into in your piece. Banks without bankers.  </p>
<p>00:01:53:05 - 00:01:58:09<br>Marty<br>So can we really have a future where we have banks without bankers?  </p>
<p>00:01:58:12 - 00:02:26:12<br>Eric<br>I think it's like I was actually watching the what Bitcoin did with Giacomo and John Carvalho and Matt Carollo last night. And, you know, they're getting deep into the scaling debate. And it was interesting because they kind of framed some of these topics in a way that I guess I didn't frame it in my paper this way, but I think it's it's helpful context because I think, you know, probably a good amount of listeners are probably thinking about it the similar way.  </p>
<p>00:02:26:14 - 00:02:59:21<br>Eric<br>But, you know, the framing it from the perspective of like there's the custodial banking type models and then there's the unilateral exit type models. One is kind of a part of Bitcoin, one isn't. And or at least John I think was framing it this way. And then I think that like a lot of the debate comes from is it like they're this binary way that we're going to be thinking about our financial system and the ecosystem built around Bitcoin or is this actually more of a spectrum of trust models that we're looking at?  </p>
<p>00:02:59:23 - 00:03:23:12<br>Eric<br>And depending on the use case, depending on the technology, depending on the timing and depending on, you know, what consumers are ultimately demanding or where on that spectrum are we going to fall in terms of the amount of trust and how much custody really exists within the system? And I feel like that's kind of a key debate. And like I view this as much more of a spectrum.  </p>
<p>00:03:23:12 - 00:03:42:25<br>Eric<br>I think that, you know, you can't the second that you take these ideas and you bring things to extremes, and that's kind of what I try to do at the beginning of the paper to say like, we have this world where we have all custodial, you know, digital gold, 2.0 Bitcoin. It has the same, you know, freedom enabling qualities as a bumper sticker.  </p>
<p>00:03:42:27 - 00:04:05:10<br>Eric<br>And, you know, we get a $12 trillion market cap and a lot of the innovations in the technology is wasted. At the other end of the spectrum, we have this completely, you know, decentralized, permissionless, peer to peer, global neutral, apolitical type monetary system. And and that also seems a bit extreme given the constraints that we're aware of at a technological level.  </p>
<p>00:04:05:12 - 00:04:24:28<br>Eric<br>And I think a lot of my writing tries to focus on, you know, how these systems are going to be optimized, where I think we're going to have self custodial use cases, and that's going to be a very large material proportion of the market. I'm not really sure what that comes out to. I think that there is some sort of, you know, theoretical amount.  </p>
<p>00:04:24:28 - 00:04:56:21<br>Eric<br>It's like there needs to be X proportion of Bitcoin within this economy that is ultimately self custodial. And if it's not, and if people can exit into that system voluntarily to a degree, then there is a risk of political capture in the long run over the system. So I think that's one of the goals, is the whole system doesn't need to be this purely self custodial, decentralized system, but it needs to be enough to act as a deterrence mechanism against political capture of the system.  </p>
<p>00:04:56:21 - 00:05:24:02<br>Eric<br>I think as long as political capture isn't influencing the financial system, then a lot of the problems that we witnessed with banking systems throughout history start to go away. And it doesn't mean they're perfect, but at least they're free markets and and people get to choose what they want in. Banks can respond to that. And the argument that I'm basically making to try to sell out in the paper is that I think that when it comes to custodial models, we can use cryptography to optimize some of the agency problems that have existed in banks for a long time.  </p>
<p>00:05:24:04 - 00:05:59:07<br>Eric<br>And those innovations are still occurring with builders today within the ecosystem. And I think that we're really optimizing agency in different ways to where I see the custodial market probably being significant, drastically different than what it's been historically. And we could probably get this hyper efficient, informational, transparent financial system to emerge from the first time. And like from my perspective, if the goal of Bitcoin and I think people have different goals of it, I like my goal for Bitcoin is I think it needs to be a settlement layer for a neutral monetary system, just needs to be a monetary system influenced by any particular person.  </p>
<p>00:05:59:10 - 00:06:07:04<br>Eric<br>And I think if we can achieve that, then that's going to change the world in a significant way and that's why these questions matter so much.  </p>
<p>00:06:07:06 - 00:06:39:07<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I completely agree. I think it goes to both extremes. I'm sorry, someone's coming in. Your stuff right there behind you. So people take it to both extremes and say like, we need everybody to be self-sovereign or it's going to be completely covered by the financial system. And I mean, again, going back to Hell's Post, I think as Bitcoiners, we need to recognize the fundamental limitations, particularly at the protocol level, and make it literally impossible.  </p>
<p>00:06:39:07 - 00:06:58:08<br>Marty<br>There's no way on earth that you can have a UTX for each person, let alone a large portion of the global population. And with that in mind, I think you have to accept that there are tradeoffs, and that's why the Lightning Network exists. We'll talk about 30 minutes a lot this up. So that's why they exist. Why liquid exist.  </p>
<p>00:06:58:15 - 00:07:35:03<br>Marty<br>That's why exchanges exist to a certain extent. And it's becoming comfortable with those tradeoffs, but at the same time, making sure the tradeoffs that are made are worthwhile and do preserve the neutral state of the network that you that you explained. And I think that's makes a lot of people butthurt. But it is the reality. Like unless we get covenants and some ability to do partial ownership of UTX as in yeah, maybe we can scale to more people, but even that comes with some cost tradeoffs that probably will price people out in the long run.  </p>
<p>00:07:35:05 - 00:08:07:13<br>Eric<br>Exactly. It's until we solve this fundamental economic problem of, you know, efficiency, the tradeoff between efficiency and neutrality or security or however you want to frame it, we're always going to be dealing with this. But I think that like the one one framework that I think kind of in the same way that we think about how this fiat system has created malinvestment throughout the economy, the political capture, the system has created a lot of mal agency.  </p>
<p>00:08:07:19 - 00:08:24:16<br>Eric<br>So like that's that's kind of like how we start to break it down fundamentally to the economic problem. Bitcoin solved agency for like basically a settlement. We have all the properties of gold. We made it much more efficient. It can do a lot more things now and it's much better than the US dollar settlement system today as well.  </p>
<p>00:08:24:16 - 00:08:45:24<br>Eric<br>So we created this new innovation, that self agency. All these people that were formerly involved in this have been automated away in a trustless way, and we can do that permissionless way now. So that's that's a major innovation. And I think that we're in the same way that Bitcoin applied cryptography in cleverly aligned incentives to make that happen.  </p>
<p>00:08:45:27 - 00:09:02:29<br>Eric<br>I think that we can do a similar thing where there's like this MAL agency and all these other financial functions that exist when it comes to like the different means of payment. There would be use and how many service providers are required to create verification between different means of payments, between banking systems. It just is bloated, it's inefficient.  </p>
<p>00:09:03:04 - 00:09:31:10<br>Eric<br>It's a lot of it's just there because of the administrative burdens that regulatory environments create. And and, you know, the barriers to entry and the lack of competition that that creates to. So it's I think a lot of it is really just we could kill off a lot of this mal agency within financial functions in significantly improve the study of banking models by doing that.  </p>
<p>00:09:31:12 - 00:09:57:07<br>Marty<br>And so how to Fetterman is playing to this in your mind versus explain sediments because I have been bullish on even since Eric dropped the first email on the mailing list came out the prototype when him I believe Casey wrote Armor and Obi were on stage at Bitcoin 2022 explaining 30 minutes. And then obviously it's actually even more precious that we're talking now.  </p>
<p>00:09:57:07 - 00:10:19:01<br>Marty<br>You had 30 minute version 0.2.1 drop last week, which is the first sort of stable release that people can feel confident building on. Everything from here on out will be backwards compatible. So it seems like sediments are officially released and able to be built on in the wild in a somewhat reliable fashion.  </p>
<p>00:10:19:04 - 00:10:38:21<br>Eric<br>Yeah, like I view, I guess I'll start with a view of sediment as it's just a technology and, and I think that there's a lot of different ways that it could be applied. I think that there's different narratives. There's, there's all these narratives that have emerged around what a sediment can be. And so I'm probably deriving my that's what I am doing.  </p>
<p>00:10:38:21 - 00:11:06:02<br>Eric<br>This piece is driving my own narratives about it. I could be dead wrong. Other people could be dead wrong, and we'll see how it's ultimately applied. But fundamentally, a sediment is a set of protocols that's designed to be compatible with the Bitcoin network and the lightning Network. That is enabling a less constrained means of payment is kind of how I categorize it.  </p>
<p>00:11:06:02 - 00:11:44:23<br>Eric<br>Like when we think about how we're scaling Bitcoin and then we think about some of the problems that lightning is running into where inbound liquidity is this major issue. And we think that that might incentivize centralization of the network over time. And lightning has a set of benefits. I think that cash is this it's this optimization towards okay, it's the least constrained means of payment that is also, you know, nearly best practices in terms of privacy, if not the and, you know, it doesn't require the inefficiency of a blockchain.  </p>
<p>00:11:44:25 - 00:12:11:21<br>Eric<br>It is just a bear asset very similar to like a cash instrument. Now that requires taking on a lot more trust. So we have to send Bitcoin to a multisig address and then they use it. Chemi and Brian Signature protocol to issue you an E cash token. And that happens, right? If you're using it from a mobile app on your phone, then you literally have memory for this e cash token on your phone, just like it would be like having cash in your wallet.  </p>
<p>00:12:11:21 - 00:12:33:17<br>Eric<br>If you lose your wallet, it's got there's ways of backing it up and other things. But, you know, and I won't get into technical details around that, but there's definitely solutions. So it's not just like if you drop your phone in the toilet, your money's gone, but but in any event, this is like another means of payment in the same way that, you know, for a while I was kind of like, Is lightning the same thing as Bitcoin?  </p>
<p>00:12:33:19 - 00:12:53:03<br>Eric<br>It has different trust, it has different security tradeoffs with operating in that kind of a system. And I think ultimately what it comes out down to is I think it's better to think about these things as a different means of payment in the same way that, you know, we have cash checks, wires, all these other different means of payment for a U.S. dollar or medium of exchange.  </p>
<p>00:12:53:05 - 00:13:18:15<br>Eric<br>And we have protocols emerging on Bitcoin that I think are doing similar things. So sediments are depositing your Bitcoin to a multisig address and trying to optimize that address based on trust and then receiving any cash token in return that allows you to very cheaply, privately, efficiently transact with people so that you can try to minimize. And it doesn't it's not perfect, right?  </p>
<p>00:13:18:16 - 00:13:45:20<br>Eric<br>We still have to figure out, you know, how to reduce on chain footprint and but putting that aside, I think that having like an E cash token is something that out of all the custodial models, as opposed to just having an account in an exchange out of all the custodial models, this is effectively like this, a way of minimizing trust by using federated technology for custody and optimizing your trust around who you want to trust.  </p>
<p>00:13:45:20 - 00:14:14:22<br>Eric<br>And like, that's the key ingredient, I think, when it comes to trust is we need to create tools that allow us to we need to create tools that make the marginal cost of moving our trust as low as possible. So when you think about depositing into a bank and trusting a bank with different things and how you would verify your trust in that bank, it's very opaque, very expensive process.  </p>
<p>00:14:14:24 - 00:14:34:29<br>Eric<br>And I think what we're doing with some of these technologies is we're leveraging cryptography to make a lot of that actually very cheap. So it's like, I don't have to trust one single point of failure. I could just a federation of people have multiple keys. I can optimize that. Not to be some random bank that's like, you know, I've never used before but just has the utility that I want.  </p>
<p>00:14:35:02 - 00:15:02:06<br>Eric<br>But I can actually have the key holders be people who I trust that I know in my day to day life, the same way that we trust people and we know in our day to day lives with everything else, there's a possibility for that. It also could be institutionalized. There's different ways that it could be done. You could often optimize trust in a different way, but nonetheless, by using a technology that allows us to apply our chops to one group, immediately, be able to exit that group very efficiently and move to another group on this digital format.  </p>
<p>00:15:02:08 - 00:15:30:08<br>Eric<br>I think it creates a much cheaper way for us to do that. And that's even similar to the innovation of like share custodial models with the Multisig transaction, right? Like until Bitcoin and we could create these Multi-signature transaction schemes. There wasn't really a cheap way of having like a shared custodial scheme. It was a much more inefficient hands on approach that you would have to go through with the relationship with the bank.  </p>
<p>00:15:30:10 - 00:15:54:04<br>Eric<br>And we're like, sure. Cassidy is push the marginal cost of creating that, you know, very, very low. And and I think that we're yet to see the economic benefits that come for this new shared custodial. A lot of the innovations that I think that are going to emerge from shared custodial models and so like that's that's kind of the first piece of like what is effective in how it ties.  </p>
<p>00:15:54:04 - 00:16:16:17<br>Eric<br>I think it's it's optimizing for agency around custodial models by using federated architecture. And then I think the next big distinction between it and like something like liquid or any other application of a blockchain is that it's not a blockchain, it's simply just a bare instrument that's private, similar to how many means of payment we have today. And that's one of the key questions, right?  </p>
<p>00:16:16:17 - 00:16:43:09<br>Eric<br>Like how many times do we need to be applying a blockchain for something? How public do we want a lot of things to be? Auditability is important in some cases, and the argument is to achieve auditability, do you need to have a consensus mechanism and a blockchain, or is there better methods of doing that as well? If we don't want out of the ability for something, then something like cash is probably an ideal construct by not leveraging a blockchain because it's not constrained.  </p>
<p>00:16:43:11 - 00:17:10:18<br>Eric<br>And I think that's one of the next major innovations, something that makes it pretty unique to anything else that's really come is it's at this confluence of distinctions kind of such a level between how it interacts with base chain, the actual asset in the way that cache set up and then like the capacity constraints around that too. So I guess that's that's probably a good place to stop on like the overview of it.  </p>
<p>00:17:10:20 - 00:17:40:15<br>Marty<br>And digging into the particular tradeoffs of the trust model. Obviously, since it's Federated, I think to begin, because that's the other thing. We like these Federated Charming Mints. They operate in this regulatory gray area, if you will. So we'll probably be a lot of quasi anonymous mints popping up. The quasi anonymous pseudo anonymous Federated members controlling the Mint.  </p>
<p>00:17:40:17 - 00:18:10:24<br>Marty<br>And ideally, if this were this technology, which I would argue is technologically superior than the incumbent system on many levels, like if you were to run with the assumption that, like people come to their senses and recognize that we have a much better technology to do these things and allow people to basically create this free banking system that Hal Finney wrote about in 2010 and publicly market like, Hey, yes, I'm a Federation member.  </p>
<p>00:18:10:24 - 00:18:57:09<br>Marty<br>In this particular Mint, you could basically do a trust analysis of the Federation members and whether or not you trust them to actually sign transactions and to make sure that they don't run you, they don't steal Bitcoin collude to steal Bitcoin from the mint. And again, playing a, uh, a hypothetical where the world comes to a senses and you're able to have this free market competition for mint users by federation members, and they're basically competing on reputation, their ability to successfully facilitate Mint operations like that is significantly better than going to a JPMorgan and trusting Jamie Dimon and his board of directors and all their managers to manage their singular bank correctly.  </p>
<p>00:18:57:12 - 00:19:35:03<br>Marty<br>That's like the one you're distributing that trust amongst multiple stakeholders who, if they were able to be public, were probably unlikely to collude because they'll probably have other business operations and they want to ruin their whole business reputation on just colluding to to rug a mint, specifically by the number two. The privacy benefit is massive, where if you enter mint and you engage in commerce using these cash tokens, the likelihood that you will get debunked because you made a transaction that the bank did not agree with.  </p>
<p>00:19:35:03 - 00:19:46:05<br>Marty<br>From a political perspective like that is simply impossible because, yes, the bank can see that people are spending in cash tokens, but they don't really know exactly who.  </p>
<p>00:19:46:07 - 00:20:12:05<br>Eric<br>Right, Right. Yeah. And I, I think that like so there's and I feel like a lot of people talk about some of these like the benefits of something like a petty mint at a micro level but I think there's two primary frames, there's the micro and then there's the macro, the systemic level. And in how could this work is like an actual banking system.  </p>
<p>00:20:12:05 - 00:20:35:17<br>Eric<br>And that's where a lot of the free banking theory starts to come in. And I think that that's what I was thinking about. I think that Hal hadn't considered the ways that we could apply innovative new technologies to building out a free banking system natively. I think it is describing it as like the system of like banks and competing notes.  </p>
<p>00:20:35:17 - 00:21:05:26<br>Eric<br>It's like he he was thinking it as more of like the analog type structure and and I think that what a lot can be done to actually remove trust and you know actual bankers from like many of these functions can be automated as well and and I think that's kind of like the distinction only when you get into like the free banking theory, I guess I could I could just give like a quick overview on what that is.  </p>
<p>00:21:05:29 - 00:21:28:10<br>Eric<br>It's basically the idea is that from the point at which we moved out of direct monetary medium settlement to note based systems, and that was kind of like the dawn of our modern banking systems. And, you know, at least within the Western world, this emerged around the 17th century. It's because money had to keep up with technology, right?  </p>
<p>00:21:28:10 - 00:22:08:29<br>Eric<br>And after we had like the printing press emerge and people realized that conducting trade over long distances using precious metals was a very expensive task. If we were to tested our assets within a bank that can issue and notes and we can use, you know, eventually we had the telegraph for it, but now we can use paper receipts to conduct trade with the trust, assuming that is, you know, that that was a very efficient mechanism, that was a scaling mechanism from the precious metal era that emerged and and governments very quickly co-opted that system because it's opaque and it creates centralized control over the asset.  </p>
<p>00:22:09:03 - 00:22:37:09<br>Eric<br>So it was it was a prime example of how political capture can occur very quickly. When we saw the history of what happened with the Bank of England and how central banking first emerged, because there is a natural need to create these branched tree based structures within the financial system so that you can optimize for highways and roads and, you know, streets on a neighborhood and and the governments could take advantage of the highways.  </p>
<p>00:22:37:12 - 00:23:00:11<br>Eric<br>So I think that the whole goal is, you know, how do we keep these things free? And, you know, luckily we have a few examples in history where they were relatively free and they weren't captured by governments. Of course, all of these things are a spectrum. It's not some sort of like binary consideration. A lot of people think about the U.S. wildcat banking system is like free banking.  </p>
<p>00:23:00:11 - 00:23:26:06<br>Eric<br>I think if you get into the literature, or at least it's a lot, I wouldn't consider that to be a good example or even definitely definitionally accurate to call it free banking. There is a lot of government influence, like there is bond collateral laws where banks weren't allowed to freely choose what what they wanted to use as a reserve asset, and they did have to have a certain percentage in their state level bonds.  </p>
<p>00:23:26:09 - 00:23:46:15<br>Eric<br>I think it was like I think New England was like the first to implement that type of policy. And in all these things, you know, they stuck with the market incentives and things don't go very well When you start to market incentives. But the two primary examples that are lean Dodd is in the Scottish free banking system and the Canadian free banking system.  </p>
<p>00:23:46:15 - 00:24:08:11<br>Eric<br>Those were in like the 18th and 19th centuries and like the Scottish free banking system was certainly not perfect. And of course, when you have market based systems and you have governments influencing other things like war and their competing international banking systems, it's very hard to operate in a free way when you have these types of considerations that are shocking your system over time.  </p>
<p>00:24:08:13 - 00:24:31:09<br>Eric<br>But nonetheless, the Scottish free banking system lasted for over a century, and and it allowed banks to freely conduct commerce in the way that they did. And that meant like in the early days of the system, they were fractionally reserving it like 20%, 10 to 20% range. And then over time, that started to come down pretty significantly. I think that there is there's a lot of arguments as to why.  </p>
<p>00:24:31:12 - 00:24:57:10<br>Eric<br>I think the majority of it is that that's pretty much how that's how much they could get away with given the market efficiency in the information transparency. But you know, like in the Keynesian direction, those economists did make an argument that like by fractionally reserving and expanding credit, it's a response to a natural market demand and it's facilitating a need within an economy.  </p>
<p>00:24:57:10 - 00:25:19:22<br>Eric<br>And that's why it occurred. And and I think that I don't really agree with that, but I think that it's one of these things that while I don't believe fractional reserve is just true, I would fall on the side where if a free market chooses something, I'd prefer that to be a case. I think that some Austrians would fall on the side that you know.  </p>
<p>00:25:19:24 - 00:25:39:11<br>Eric<br>I think so, yes. This was a good example of one who believes that the government should intervene. And, you know, make it so the fractional reserve doesn't exist within the banking system. And I don't think that's right either. But, you know, there's different views on like what the solution is. And generally where it follows that should be an actual market mechanism.  </p>
<p>00:25:39:11 - 00:26:00:22<br>Eric<br>But what we saw in those systems was it was a natural market mechanism. And in these free banking systems, they were good in terms of, you know, these were prosperous periods oftentimes. And in the ideas that they were creating economic wealth, whether that was from credit or just because we had an efficient system in general is a highly debated topic amongst economists.  </p>
<p>00:26:00:22 - 00:26:32:23<br>Eric<br>But nonetheless, I think that like taking that background on free banking, I think that a lot of the reasons that those systems ended up in fractional reserve and a digital world with the Internet, with base settlement layer assets that have a unilateral exit or a fallback to a system of a, you know, peer to peer for the first time in history, I think that that incentive creates a new vector of competition within banking systems that fundamentally changes the incentives.  </p>
<p>00:26:32:23 - 00:27:11:23<br>Eric<br>And because of that, I think that we could actually have very hyper efficient information like transparent systems. And I think sediment is one protocol that could be a part of that potentially, as well as the Lightning Network, as well as other concepts that are currently emerging. And and I think that if we can achieve that, we could actually create something that is that is a truly neutral type of monetary system and provides a consumer experience that we want that I think the goal is going back to the point of like optimizing around agency.  </p>
<p>00:27:12:00 - 00:27:38:20<br>Eric<br>I think that a lot of people are looking at the scaling debates from purely a technological standpoint. And while I think that's incredibly valuable and incredibly important, I'm starting to think that by accepting trust in certain areas or in actually just coming up with clever ways to align incentives, that is probably a way that we're actually going to have innovation emerge within these protocols in the way that they interact with one another.  </p>
<p>00:27:38:20 - 00:28:07:18<br>Eric<br>We might be able to accomplish things that we hadn't been able to accomplish before in prior financial systems. So I think that that's that's one of the key things that like learning from what Bitcoin did, we can apply to some of these other protocols where Bitcoin wasn't just combining, you know, digital signature algorithms and hash functions and blockchain database structure.  </p>
<p>00:28:07:21 - 00:28:36:12<br>Eric<br>And, you know, it wasn't just a combination of these technologies, but it was cleverly aligning the incentives of all of these technologies, putting in the final missing piece of proof of work and a difficulty adjustment, and then having that all work. And it's like, that's a really beautiful thing, getting that, getting the incentives to align properly and then building a community and a culture that enables that to persist is I think I think that that you could argue, is one of the primary innovations that exists within Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:28:36:12 - 00:28:45:01<br>Eric<br>And and I think that that's what we're trying to accomplish today within other trust models.  </p>
<p>00:28:45:03 - 00:28:54:13<br>Marty<br>And particularly with settlements. How do you view that incentive, the proper incentive system? For me.  </p>
<p>00:28:54:16 - 00:29:15:15<br>Eric<br>It's like like I like I don't know, right. But like I write about some ideas that I think are interesting. I think a good example of this is like, okay, so we're accepting trust going into a multisig and then we might be able to optimize that. We might get roads, but we're going to use this cash, it's going to be a lot more efficient.  </p>
<p>00:29:15:18 - 00:29:39:00<br>Eric<br>And then the questions like, okay, going back to that point about how like shared custodial models like making the cost of shared custody approach, the marginal cost is like approaching a very low amount and we can apply a very similar thing to the verification of a bank itself, right? Like do you ferryman in bank? And it doesn't even have this like auditable blockchain.  </p>
<p>00:29:39:08 - 00:30:02:11<br>Eric<br>But I think it was really cool. Is this proposal that Kayleigh, who created the Cashew Protocol, which is also need cash protocol, leveraging lightning and not using federated technology, but he created this proposal that is developed at the first time I actually read about it was from the script project in 2017, but it was much more developed around the idea of verifying bank runs effectively.  </p>
<p>00:30:02:11 - 00:30:43:20<br>Eric<br>It's like basically creating an automated bank run system and it's like, okay, so if we were to implement this and say like wallet technologies, your wallet, you're interacting with the sentiment and your wallet will only participate in sediments that abide by this kind of standard. And we see that today in the financial economy for a lot of things, like there's certain accreditations that exist and there's people that only deal with or there's natural industry standards that emerge based on certain accreditations or best practices that firms need to follow, you know, like audits being a great example and this is kind of just like a way of a much cheaper way of conducting automated forms of  </p>
<p>00:30:43:20 - 00:31:14:04<br>Eric<br>audit on a settlement, because if anything, it does have the ability to produce reports of how much cash it's issued. You can't say who has it or where, but it can give you total of that. So like we could actually audit the fractional reserve. The question is, is what the meant is reporting true and with the scheme that he's proposing, it's basically like if you're a mint and you publicly commit to rotating your cash like equally with your has to be anything called a one year or two year exploration on it.  </p>
<p>00:31:14:06 - 00:31:40:27<br>Eric<br>And then you produce like publicly auditable, you catch tokens in the form of like a mint proof and you produce publicly audible redemptions of cash tokens. Then you can find what the net difference would be between and how mints, which is they would either if they issue too many, they would try to make fake redemptions or they could make fake issuance.  </p>
<p>00:31:40:29 - 00:32:03:13<br>Eric<br>And there's ways in which consumers can actually voluntarily report or catch a mint if their cash token doesn't exist within the list because it was arbitrarily burned from their list and they're not reporting it. Or on the other side, if you know, nobody else really sees a way that they could find any. So there are some fake things that nobody else can verify.  </p>
<p>00:32:03:16 - 00:32:29:16<br>Eric<br>None of these provide. It's like a consumer reporting type mechanism that can basically be audit automated within a wallet system. And none of these things create a perfect way of catching a mint. But what it does is it basically makes it probabilistically certain on a long enough timeline that a mint will get caught from running a fractional reserve, in which case that changes the incentives for the mint.  </p>
<p>00:32:29:16 - 00:32:48:08<br>Eric<br>It's not a perfect technological solution, but it changes the incentives of the Mint so that the members just say, okay, well, am I going to pursue this as a long term business model because I know that you're going to get caught. Maybe I won't try to drug anybody. I'm actually gonna try to pursue a full reserve. Or at the end of the spectrum, maybe the market demands it and that it does actually exist.  </p>
<p>00:32:48:08 - 00:33:25:06<br>Eric<br>But if the market doesn't demand it, I think that there's ways to create to capture and isolate the goal of information transparency within a trusted system without actually having to be fully transparent with like an auditable public ledger. And I think that's a really cool innovation, right? I think that having something like that is it's it's it's a leveraging cryptography to allow us to reveal and find information that we choose with optionality rather than having it be for us.  </p>
<p>00:33:25:07 - 00:33:47:22<br>Eric<br>Like how much public data is being revealed on blockchains being arbitrarily applied to all these systems, It's either irrelevant or completely unnecessary to be revealed, and we can create systems that are actually much more efficient with how we're doing that and allow us to achieve the goal of we really just want to audit this bank to make sure we're not just getting slow, but ideally we have a federated system with a group of people we trust and we're not going to get robbed overnight.  </p>
<p>00:33:47:24 - 00:34:12:17<br>Eric<br>And if that is the case, then the question is, well, maybe they have an incentive to try to slower, I guess, over time by increasing the amount of cash tokens at a very, very small amount and making a small amount. And eventually we get to this more extreme fractional reserve point over a decade. This would create an incentive where it's very cheap to verify against that, to apply this to like analog banking situations.  </p>
<p>00:34:12:17 - 00:34:39:03<br>Eric<br>It's like how do people create in automate bank runs on a bank? In our system today you can it's just like you don't even know who like there's no way to like actually automate these kind of things. And then when you consider the withdrawals and the crisis that occurred at the beginning of this year or last year with the most recent banking crises, like they were blaming that stuff on mobile money schemes and they're saying, oh, the runs are happening so much more rapidly because of mobile money.  </p>
<p>00:34:39:03 - 00:35:00:27<br>Eric<br>It's like, imagine what we can create in the system and what runs would look like. And and that's when I started thinking about a distraction. I'm like, damn, like this is going to be really freaking efficient. I don't know if you can unless, like, there's an economic benefit of running a fractional reserve institution that I don't particularly seem aware of, but we can always have credit issued in other ways.  </p>
<p>00:35:00:27 - 00:35:14:03<br>Eric<br>It doesn't have to be through fractional reserve. And so, like, unless that's the case, I would presume that we're probably going to create a system so efficient that we're not really going to see that happening unless it's fraud or something.  </p>
<p>00:35:14:05 - 00:35:20:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah, and there's no lender of last resort in this model either, so that just increases the risk way more sake.  </p>
<p>00:35:20:29 - 00:35:29:13<br>Eric<br>And there's a self-sovereign peer to peer competitor as well. And, and that increases it even more to.  </p>
<p>00:35:29:15 - 00:35:58:23<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So how do you and just curious because I'm curious of this as well just to see it play out, I'm sure we'll see over the next year or two how it does. And unfortunately, due to the regulatory landscape that exists in the world right now, we'll probably be more underground, more small niche communities building these mints. But in your ideal vision of settlements, succeeding to the level that we believe they can, what does it look like?  </p>
<p>00:35:58:23 - 00:36:28:12<br>Marty<br>Is it a world of communities spinning up their own mints and having community members join them in doing the Uncle Jim model, the Guardian model that Fed is really going after or do you see or not? Or yet do you see this becoming more professionalized where you have maybe Bitcoin companies with good reputations become federation members and spin up mints with other companies that they trust and others trust in the space?  </p>
<p>00:36:28:12 - 00:36:30:12<br>Marty<br>Or is it a combination of both?  </p>
<p>00:36:30:15 - 00:37:01:05<br>Eric<br>Yeah. Yeah. Like, you know, I, I, I guess like what do I think is most likely? It's like there's a lot of things I think I could see when it comes to what I think is most likely. It's like, where do I see Bitcoin in ten years? I see some sort of like concentration of developing economies is that are all opting into this neutral system and actually conducting trade and holding reserves in it.  </p>
<p>00:37:01:07 - 00:37:36:10<br>Eric<br>And it's kind of reached a critical mass and it's in the tens of trillions type value range. And I think that within those kind of economies we'd probably see federated e cash based community custodial models that exist in the obviously like within the KYC AML world. The questions like, okay, well, is E cash? The ideal method that would be leveraged is like a form of like, you know, de facto note issuance within developing economies.  </p>
<p>00:37:36:12 - 00:38:07:25<br>Eric<br>And that's something I don't know. I think like I guess like I don't know, my current thinking around it is basically I think that if we want to have I think in those kind of environments, like if you're in a situation where you have to participate in KYC and then that requires a degree of auditability, in which case the E cache privacy I think is still valuable on a peer to peer basis.  </p>
<p>00:38:07:29 - 00:38:38:16<br>Eric<br>But you know, the Federated, the federations going to know who you are based on, I'm assuming at least. So they would have to. But that may not be the ideal system, right? It's just like you probably are going to want some sort of system. And I don't think a blockchain would be the ideal system for that either. It's like you can have some sort of account based ledger that's, you know, and and you could put that into a chain structure of like embedded hashes.  </p>
<p>00:38:38:16 - 00:39:01:10<br>Eric<br>But I feel like just having general, you know, certain types of ledgers that are maintained in more of a centralized form and provided it's the idea of like, you know, private blockchains, but let's not make it a blockchain that requires consensus because it's just us here. Like what are we trying to achieve consensus over? I'm in charge and the CEO of the company or whatever it is I have final say.  </p>
<p>00:39:01:10 - 00:39:11:21<br>Eric<br>So let's not beat around the bush and let's just create something more efficient, I guess. Yeah, I don't know that that's kind of how I see it at this point.  </p>
<p>00:39:11:23 - 00:39:34:12<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Which is unfortunate because yeah, the possibilities which we should dive into too, because I mean, up to this point in the conversation, we're talking about e cash tokens, you put your Bitcoin into this Multisig address, you get a commensurate amount of e cash tokens in return they can use in a peer to peer fashion or send to other mints over the Lightning Network.  </p>
<p>00:39:34:15 - 00:40:15:09<br>Marty<br>But that's just the base case. Most fundamental use case is using these cash tokens as cash. But the way the Ferryman protocol has been built in a very modular fashion enables modules within that can provide what the incumbent banking system provides. But in this distributed system, using cryptographic primitives to provide app like services within the Mint. And so I've had Theo Majani on when he wrote the piece before you for Acxiom, talking about Bitcoin money market funds that could be constructed using DLCs and within 30 minutes you can construct Ios's.  </p>
<p>00:40:15:11 - 00:40:47:00<br>Marty<br>Stability pools are something that are a hot topic within the Fetterman community and they could essentially replace Stablecoins in terms of probably using something like a DLC contract for difference to create a stable value within a within a mint for people who don't want to take the price volatility risk of bitcoin want to lock in stable US dollar value when they launched version 0.2.1 last week, they announced that there's a prediction market module like how extensible is the settlement protocol.  </p>
<p>00:40:47:00 - 00:40:50:02<br>Marty<br>Like what kind of sci fi things can we build?  </p>
<p>00:40:50:04 - 00:41:20:19<br>Eric<br>Yeah, that's a good question. I definitely don't want to act like I'm any sort of authority on this. I assume you probably actually know more about it than I would, but I think that there's I think just like once again, back to the idea that like cash is kind of an ideal means of payment, and because it's built in a way that's very modular, there's I would assume that like most automated forms of smart contract things would be leveraging the system similar to this.  </p>
<p>00:41:20:21 - 00:41:43:15<br>Eric<br>And, and I think that because of that, like yeah, I think like the biggest thing I think stability pools is cool. My concern is that I could see like what I think about like the end users. It's like sharing like obviously for like Bitcoin specific users it's going to be a ton of people. Like I want that our local devs meet up out here in Denver.  </p>
<p>00:41:43:17 - 00:42:05:13<br>Eric<br>We would have a federation set up and we want to, you know, transact with cash between us. We already have our de-facto guardians within the group who control the multisig as it is right now. And, and that seems like something is really compelling, particularly if we could take a stability pool type position within that stack over time. That would be awesome.  </p>
<p>00:42:05:15 - 00:42:35:26<br>Eric<br>There's a lot of use cases that we would use for that. And, and I think that like the for like the broader mass market though, like I guess for like listeners in terms of background, you know, like tether is just making way too much money as stablecoins come into more competition, they're going to be enticing people that passing along the money that they're making on the reserve assets through the coin itself and providing an interest rate just like, you know, it's like a neobank merging within the same system.  </p>
<p>00:42:35:26 - 00:43:02:23<br>Eric<br>And I think the challenges that you're going to be competing against fiat economics with those rates to the average consumer, it's like, you know, API here versus API here. I want higher one, you know, hold this Stablecoin. I think that I wonder how competitive stability pools will be in the market because it's going to be more like paying a cost to have stability over time.  </p>
<p>00:43:02:25 - 00:43:33:11<br>Eric<br>And I think that like while, you know, while the exact same economic game is being played in the last crypto crisis, I think that, you know, the fiat type economics system is going to take a little bit longer to go away than, you know what, like Moshinsky and some of these other guys we're trying to do. So it's like, I think that that's kind of one of the I'm really curious to see how that aspect in the market develops over time.  </p>
<p>00:43:33:13 - 00:44:06:25<br>Eric<br>But I think that it's going to be a really valuable utility that exists within the system in terms of like other things that are emerging. I like, once again, going back to the idea of like it's just a technology and there's a lot of different ways that it can emerge. I think that I think that like it could be a system where, you know, like there's there's a lot of collateralized lending that starts to exist.  </p>
<p>00:44:06:25 - 00:44:43:24<br>Eric<br>I think that by bringing together people in this like banking or monetary type format, there is other forms of lending or on collateralized lending that could start to emerge within community functions. I think that like while there's quite a bit of needs, particularly within like the developing economy world, there's definitely a big capital problem. And, and perhaps these types of systems that aren't is regulated and are circumventing the traditional banking system could actually create like a funnel for new forms of capital to flow within these regions.  </p>
<p>00:44:43:26 - 00:44:49:18<br>Eric<br>And I think that that's like one of the particularly interesting use cases of elements.  </p>
<p>00:44:49:21 - 00:45:22:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah, not I can't keep, but harkening back to the fact that the regulatory environment is such where this sort of has to, you can't really go balls deep in this as like a builder here in the U.S. because it's yeah, the privacy really scares people. But I think over time, again, technology always wins out. I think this will be something that proliferates and wins massively.  </p>
<p>00:45:22:24 - 00:45:39:25<br>Marty<br>I'm and it's a bit contrarian in the Bitcoin space I mean a lot of people um that's another funny thing or like Friedman's been talked about for two years, there's nothing to show for it. It's probably not going to have much success. It's federated model, stupid. It's like, yeah, took a couple of years. Yes, it's been talked about for a couple of years.  </p>
<p>00:45:39:25 - 00:45:52:06<br>Marty<br>But like we mentioned, the first stable release came out last week or two weeks ago. Now at this point, that was last week. And we're only getting to the point where you can actually build cool things on this.  </p>
<p>00:45:52:08 - 00:45:54:00<br>Eric<br>Um, yep.  </p>
<p>00:45:54:02 - 00:46:23:06<br>Marty<br>And it's crazy because again, juxtaposing it to the incumbent banking system, you can create better experiences, more secure experiences by distributing risk not only within a man, but amongst multiple men. So, I mean, maybe we should jump down that rabbit hole is like, how do you view individual roles interacting with charming events? Will they have a go to mint or do you think they'll distribute that risk among many mints?  </p>
<p>00:46:23:06 - 00:46:28:09<br>Marty<br>Maybe two or three, maybe even a dozen that that provide specific services.  </p>
<p>00:46:28:11 - 00:46:55:01<br>Eric<br>Right? Yeah. Yeah. I think that like, there's going to be like highways and roads and streets that emerge. You're probably going to have like commercial scale type settlements in once again, if it's just one technology, right? Like wicked effective, it could also very easily create or create some sort of like auditability audit ability type module. You can build anything and have it be interactive with this protocol.  </p>
<p>00:46:55:08 - 00:47:21:17<br>Eric<br>So like I could see a, you know, quote unquote settlement or just banking infrastructure in general that is a part of the settlement protocol for one reason that is acting as like an exchange based type service. And I could see that being an institution, it's also probably a lightning service provider and is, you know, any other protocols that are relevant to interact within the network.  </p>
<p>00:47:21:19 - 00:47:46:19<br>Eric<br>They're probably going to be participating in in some form. It's like we're having this proliferation where I think the idea of like a bank, quote unquote, is really just like a service provider and and there's different protocols in which they're going to interact with, and there's different ways that they can extract, extract values like a business model. So like that go going back to I kind of like that money market type model of like the Bitcoin native money markets that are emerging.  </p>
<p>00:47:46:19 - 00:48:11:14<br>Eric<br>That's a really big idea. I think we need to get to like that very first catalyst in terms of means of payment before these really start to grow and expand and become material. But you know, lightning routing and liquidity leasing fees is a money market. And then lightning operators that are market making between lightning and E cash is also a market.  </p>
<p>00:48:11:16 - 00:48:36:01<br>Eric<br>And as you go further down the risk curve towards, you know, collateralized lending and then off chain lending, there's all these different money markets that are going to start to emerge in a digitally native fashion and and by being able to commit your capital directly into protocols that allow us to earn some type of interest or peer to peer marketplace, does that allow us to earn a type of interest?  </p>
<p>00:48:36:03 - 00:49:00:21<br>Eric<br>It's like we're creating these money markets relevant that are a part of a means of payment system that we haven't before. It's like by conducting, let's assume that within our current banking system we have like the cashier's check and within the cashier's check market, there's some level of fees that banks are consistently earning on an annual basis and the banks are all capturing it.  </p>
<p>00:49:00:24 - 00:49:18:21<br>Eric<br>Well, now it's like peer to peer participants are probably going to have access into those capital markets as well directly. And the banks won't be as much of an intermediary. It'll be more just like peer to peer capital markets. And like that's really cool because I think that that's going to create these virtuous cycles of growth within the capital markets over time.  </p>
<p>00:49:18:23 - 00:49:41:19<br>Eric<br>But going back to my point, like I feel like all those things stem on, like what's the first use case? And there's all these use cases that have kind of emerged and like crypto world that I don't perceive as sustainable use cases, or at least not in a material way. And, and I think the questions like what's the first one?  </p>
<p>00:49:41:19 - 00:50:06:29<br>Eric<br>And maybe that's maybe that's I leveraging lightning for agents and maybe that's global remittances leveraging the Lightning Network or maybe they're leveraging cash at some point too. I could see, I think when you get into the weeds of how that works, I think that cash could potentially be a viable way of achieving their goals, of moving collateral from one legal entity in one country to a legal entity in another country, and circumventing the banking system.  </p>
<p>00:50:07:01 - 00:50:33:14<br>Eric<br>And it wouldn't have an inbound liquidity constraint. And so whatever this is, whatever is all the fees that are extracted from operating in these new means of payment, those fees create the capital market over time. And then as we get capital markets, more investors come in, as more investors come in or people participate, more people become end users, so on and so forth.  </p>
<p>00:50:33:17 - 00:50:42:07<br>Eric<br>And I think that that's probably of the major killer apps that's going to come out of a lot of this. But still waiting on that catalyst.  </p>
<p>00:50:42:09 - 00:50:47:03<br>Marty<br>Yeah, is going to be the one the flex the domino could solve this stuff.  </p>
<p>00:50:47:03 - 00:50:53:12<br>Eric<br>Yeah I think we're getting close to man like think things are getting wild. I think this could be the year that we really what do you.  </p>
<p>00:50:53:12 - 00:50:56:17<br>Marty<br>Say that.  </p>
<p>00:50:56:20 - 00:51:25:04<br>Eric<br>I think we're I think we're building out I think from like I don't want to harp on like the whole like crossing the Chasm ETF thing. It's like there's plenty this funny enough around that. But I think like, this is what I'm looking at is like the Crossing the Chasm moment. It's just like I, I think that there is a bit of a critical mass and there are going to be enough tools within the next, I'll say, a year or two to where we could see a consumer level catalyst going back to like the two I'm making.  </p>
<p>00:51:25:04 - 00:51:58:11<br>Eric<br>Like if if we see like something like something like remittance markets, you know, some other form of adoption would really take off. And I feel like we are getting close to, oh, admittedly part of it's an intuition, but, you know, I definitely think that there's a lot being built in. There's a critical mass and in Bitcoin's because it's crossing this chasm of like legitimacy in the more regulated markets, that that is probably going to change the way that it's perceived and by the public.  </p>
<p>00:51:58:11 - 00:52:21:00<br>Eric<br>When we do start to have like a catalyst moment from one of these new like payment means or service use cases. And I think I think I think that there's like a pretty big moment coming from that. And I feel like that's when I think that's what things are going to get really, really wild. And it's not just going to be from like BlackRock buying our bags.  </p>
<p>00:52:21:02 - 00:52:55:15<br>Marty<br>Now. It's actually the contrarian take right now too, because everybody again is convinced that BlackRock entering all the ETFs, launching is the end of Self-sovereign Cypherpunk Bitcoin. But I think this is just the beginning when you consider the the protocols that are emerging. Obviously lightning's been around liquid's been around for three months finally launch and another proposal right now and I know Barack's working on it, but another sort of technology, another second layer solution that you discuss in the piece is ARC.  </p>
<p>00:52:55:15 - 00:53:33:08<br>Marty<br>And admittedly I've been only following an arm's length and haven't really delved into the details of the design of that particular layer and how it would work. So I think I don't think we've ever talked about ARC on TFT or Rabbit Hole Recap. Yeah, maybe in passing on Rabbit Hole recap, but I think it would be a good opportunity to dive into the arc of what it is conceptually and what sort of problems it would solve, because it does make different tradeoffs, obviously, and does do things better than lightning and filaments do in some ways.  </p>
<p>00:53:33:10 - 00:54:04:27<br>Eric<br>Yeah. So the first thing I'll give a disclaimer that I'm not the best person to be describing ARC, but again, I can talk about some things that like a high level and it's definitely unique in some ways and complex, and I really don't have any sort of certainty or firm opinion on it. But like we were it, it's interesting and I could see some there are some valuable things that I can talk about with that is what I'll say the like.  </p>
<p>00:54:05:00 - 00:54:48:09<br>Eric<br>I think that first. Yeah. So like part of the disclaimer, it's an emerging protocol. It requires a saw for it really to be usable in any legitimate way. And I think that when I decided to include it in the paper, I think it's just because it seems like while settlements like this, a trusted form of potential banking services are emerging, I think that arcs are like they do have potential to be like a trustless version or similar to a lightning trust minimized type version with, you know, unilateral withdrawal from the protocol existing as a property.  </p>
<p>00:54:48:11 - 00:55:37:01<br>Eric<br>And and I think that that's pretty cool. And you know, I didn't talk about rollups I'm still learning about rollups but I think that that's something else that requires the stuff works that would be, you know, potentially applying a similar quality. But basically what an arc is, is you're creating this agreement with an arch service provider, and that's a person or a group that has Bitcoin and you're creating an agreement with them where you say, okay, we are going to enter into this multisig with the time expiry on it and, and it might be just minimum, it might be me and 100 other people as well all getting into this multisig and you know, similar  </p>
<p>00:55:37:01 - 00:56:09:09<br>Eric<br>to like a channel factory is an onboarding mechanism and that's, that's kind of value proposition number one, but requires software. And it's not like anything distinct. There's without arc or no arc, there's ways that we can accomplish that same goal anyways, any protocol. But that's one part of the value proposition is that you can minimize on chain footprint and then when you enter into this, the our service provider provides a pre signed transaction to you so that you can exit out of protocol when you choose with that multisig agreement.  </p>
<p>00:56:09:11 - 00:56:53:20<br>Eric<br>But the goal would be to have you stay in the protocol. And if you remain within the protocol, it's basically they can conduct swap payments on your behalf so that you can pay people either at that are also compatible with the protocol. And they call these vortexes virtual transaction outputs where you're just trading pre signed transactions. Now because of the nature of the way it works, when a swap payment is done, the service provider has to the amount of capital required to conduct payments within an arc is effectively double the amount that is deposited within it.  </p>
<p>00:56:53:22 - 00:57:22:18<br>Eric<br>So that's where you run into a problem and that's where people are kind of like debating, you know, will this be viable? And those like the primary criticism of it, I think. But that basically means that this isn't the right number. But like in theory, it's like if ten and a half million Bitcoin were all to exist in our service providers, that would be the maximum that could happen because the service provider needs the other ten and a half million to be able to conduct swap transactions.  </p>
<p>00:57:22:20 - 00:57:59:10<br>Eric<br>And that's where I get into some of the problems is like while one of the goals of ARK was to remove this inbound liquidity constraint that lightning has, and that was kind of the cool part. But I think the problem is that the burden does get passed along to an ARK service provider. So it's kind of like almost and I guess, I don't know, this is completely right, but I think it's somewhat like centralizing the liquidity requirements in a way which is kind of already naturally happening within mining service providers, but by doing that, they could just basically conduct payments for you the way that you want with these virtual prison transactions.  </p>
<p>00:57:59:10 - 00:58:24:14<br>Eric<br>And anybody can take that and they can call that slip and they can unilaterally exit at any time. So like the one thing that I thought was kind of interesting is like the I think our service providers don't really make any sense when you think about them at a small scale, but as you scale them more, it actually kind of could make sense.  </p>
<p>00:58:24:17 - 00:58:46:19<br>Eric<br>And these are just like, I have these like swag estimates in there with a little like paper model that I built around what it could look like. But it's like if we kind of like, you know, assume certain transaction values of Bitcoin, then we can assume how what like the ultimate transaction throughput our service provider could eventually become.  </p>
<p>00:58:46:21 - 00:59:16:02<br>Eric<br>And I think when Bitcoin is valued less right, like if the average transaction size, let's say let's go to like one extreme right, it's like one bitcoin, then, you know, transactions per second is pretty much on par with bitcoins throughput of like six transactions per second. And then but as Bitcoin becomes more valuable, the average transaction within a system is less and less on a Satoshi basis.  </p>
<p>00:59:16:05 - 00:59:50:09<br>Eric<br>And I think that that's kind of an interesting idea because as Bitcoin grows and becomes more valuable and let's just assume that, you know, for sake of argument that the average transaction size, like globally across all payments is somewhere like 100 bucks or whatever it is, that as that is represented by less and less satoshis, the higher the transaction throughput of an our service provider becomes in terms of like its theoretical threshold of capital required.  </p>
<p>00:59:50:09 - 01:00:20:20<br>Eric<br>So like in today it's like, well, 10 billion bitcoin total value of payments settled isn't that much, but if you know, the Bitcoin as an asset is worth 100,000,000,000,001 day, now all of a sudden it starts to get pretty interesting. We're like, you know, 100 bits worth of average transaction size. You know, if that is like your average amount, then like, you know, 60,000 transactions per second is closer to where it could be.  </p>
<p>01:00:20:20 - 01:00:37:12<br>Eric<br>And that's on par with like a credit card company. And then if we get higher and higher, if we reach like parity or something like that, the numbers start to get a lot bigger. So I kind of just think it was like an interesting way of thinking about maybe it's like a long term, very, very long term type thing.  </p>
<p>01:00:37:15 - 01:00:48:13<br>Eric<br>But a lot of people were talking about it when I was writing this and I decided to dive into it and there's a lot of other things I didn't include in this paper that, you know, I would have if I had all the time in the world, But I'm getting to those.  </p>
<p>01:00:48:16 - 01:01:09:16<br>Marty<br>Yeah, admittedly, I've been a bit apprehensive to dive into Ark because it is. Yeah, Complex might be the right word, but it is. It's like a whole nother level of sort of system design that, yeah, I need to take the time to sit down and actually like read through and understand.  </p>
<p>01:01:09:19 - 01:01:18:09<br>Eric<br>This facility is this, this thing with the end for me. And I'm just like, oh, I need to, I need to punch that one out soon. But I guess it's so different.  </p>
<p>01:01:18:11 - 01:01:46:02<br>Marty<br>Yeah, No, I mean, in your final thoughts in the essay too, I thought you put it very presciently to like visualizing what this would look like. Like, uh, it's going to read from the final thoughts. Spoiler if you're planning on reading this and haven't yet. But imagine a system where users dollar cost averaging to Bitcoin via Aki's Federated Technology for custody in cash as a private cash balance for everyday transactions.  </p>
<p>01:01:46:02 - 01:02:10:15<br>Marty<br>And on the back end, all service providers are clearing balances between one another via the Lightning Network, Fundaments and ASPs could act as banking infrastructure, and the Lightning Network could act as a clearing house amongst them as a hub and spoke model further competition and information transparency are fostered by technologies like web of stakes, reputation management systems and expiring e cash reserve systems that is incredibly sci fi in the future.  </p>
<p>01:02:10:15 - 01:02:12:07<br>Marty<br>I want to see.  </p>
<p>01:02:12:10 - 01:02:40:21<br>Eric<br>So yeah, I guess I kind of missed the punch on that. I should have gone into that. It's like the sci fi detail, but like that's basically me just trying to draw. Like in free banking systems, you had banks, brokers, clearinghouses, net settlement between all these different groups, speculators who try to put banks out of business. I think that all that's emerging at a protocol level and I'm trying to like draw comparisons for like how these functions that have always existed are emerging in a new way, in a better way.  </p>
<p>01:02:40:24 - 01:02:41:26<br>Eric<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:02:41:29 - 01:03:04:16<br>Marty<br>And so what do you think it's going to take? I mean, obviously we've talked about the catalyst and the emerging market is probably a place for this to start because they need something like this desperately. It's a step function improvement of what they're using and it will enable capital inflows that have not been possible today. But when you think about here in the West, do you think we get on board with this technology anytime soon?  </p>
<p>01:03:04:18 - 01:03:32:12<br>Eric<br>I feel like in the West I could see it actually. Like I mean, I guess it depends on your timeline, but I guess like we're thinking tomorrow, like, you know, like I was saying earlier, I think our local meet up wants to use something just like this. And it's like, I think if you have like comments or you have whatever you got, if people are conducting payments all the time, peer to peer, it's like if you have your own like federation set up and people are just effectively leveraging that and using these low cost cash payments, like, I think that's pretty cool.  </p>
<p>01:03:32:12 - 01:04:01:22<br>Eric<br>That's how I'll probably start using it. And yeah, I in terms of like other things, you know, I know that some people are thinking that there's like an institutional use case for like federal federated technology in general. And I think that that could make sense with like how you can leverage federated consensus to, to like optimize for how security is conducted within an organization, right like that.  </p>
<p>01:04:01:28 - 01:04:20:04<br>Eric<br>That's a great way of thinking about like what is shared custody. It's like, well, every organization is a form of shared custody. There's different permissions, it's different levels and there's different, you know, quote unquote, keys or passwords that people hold to be able to designs on behalf of a group. And and there is potential for this to be used.  </p>
<p>01:04:20:04 - 01:04:32:07<br>Eric<br>I guess going back to my point earlier, though, my hesitance was that is I don't know if e cache is necessarily the best medium for those types of use cases.  </p>
<p>01:04:32:10 - 01:04:51:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah. I mean, like just multi institution blend vanilla multisig makes a lot of sense for that, especially if the institutional level in your dealing with a lot of money rich transactions are probably worth it. If using a taproot multisig it's cheaper than wrap SegWit or something like that.  </p>
<p>01:04:51:15 - 01:04:53:24<br>Eric<br>So yeah.  </p>
<p>01:04:53:26 - 01:05:24:16<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it is crazy. I mean, that's another whole topic. Like before we even get to like the sci fi settlement, like just one simple low hanging fruit is making multi institution multi standard like, yeah, like with these ETFs all going to Coinbase that God forbid, I don't think it's going to happen. I think the history of Xapo and Coinbase, Coinbase acquired Zappo and Xapo obviously founded by Wences and Ted Rogers, did an incredible job of creating security protocols to ensure that they can protect your private keys.  </p>
<p>01:05:24:16 - 01:05:46:03<br>Marty<br>But God forbid Coinbase were to somehow get exploited their cold storage at least and you have what people are saying will be tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars over the next few years flow into these ETFs. They're leveraging Coinbase like that would be terrible. Like distribute that risk on multiple institutions, very low hanging fruit.  </p>
<p>01:05:46:06 - 01:06:11:01<br>Eric<br>Right? Right. Yeah. Which is kind of like an interesting idea of and I was I was thinking about this in terms of settlements. There could be an avenue as well where you separate minting from custody and that can create kind of a check and balance on the system. Interesting. But I don't know if that would be something that would ever naturally emerge.  </p>
<p>01:06:11:01 - 01:06:29:16<br>Eric<br>But I've kind of thought about if if there's a separation of custody from, you know, pretty much everything else in some format, then you might have parties with a interest that are, you know, fulfilling both of those functions. And that might be a good check on the system.  </p>
<p>01:06:29:19 - 01:06:32:03<br>Marty<br>How would that work?  </p>
<p>01:06:32:05 - 01:06:50:25<br>Eric<br>Well, I think that like e cash minting is technically arbitrary, right? So it's like you could just be a mint and you would have like, you know, say like a separate custodial provider who is the federation. And they're just like, we're the guys you have like your guardians hold the keys, We don't have your goatee. It's actually minting the cash.  </p>
<p>01:06:50:28 - 01:07:20:25<br>Eric<br>I don't know how like the current settlement architecture that could actually work. It's sort of like a theoretical idea and perhaps it actually is a simple thing. I never really talked to those guys about it, but I've kind of wondered if, like, you'd be like, okay, with this very minute we went to see Cash. Our custody is actually held by you, you know, some other group, whoever it is and is is long is like, you know, the same way that other custodial it could be like based on like trusted legal agreements between two organizations.  </p>
<p>01:07:20:25 - 01:07:34:14<br>Eric<br>Like at the end of the day, as long as somebody controls the funds, there's a risk of fraud, But it doesn't really have to be the mint and then, you know, profits and contracts oftentimes, I think, solve most issues.  </p>
<p>01:07:34:14 - 01:08:00:00<br>Marty<br>But yeah, interesting sort of an end user trying to think of how there's two ways I could see this going. And user takes Bitcoin goes to the federation. It's handling the custody, puts the Bitcoin in there, they take the bitcoin, give it to the mint, get e cash tokens in return. The mint has the bitcoin for doing that service or you can just have the user go straight to the mint and say, Hey, I want this many cash tokens in this mint.  </p>
<p>01:08:00:00 - 01:08:04:08<br>Marty<br>And they just mint them and send it to custody. That could be.  </p>
<p>01:08:04:08 - 01:08:20:16<br>Eric<br>Fascinating, right? Yeah, Yeah. I mean, it's so different than right, like major, you know, it's like the financial service providers in the industry today who use like you use like trying to trust or, you know, any of these other third party custodial providers give you something similar to that.  </p>
<p>01:08:20:18 - 01:08:27:23<br>Marty<br>Yeah, Fascinating. It's a brave new world. Eric Dix What do you think about all this ETF stuff?  </p>
<p>01:08:27:26 - 01:08:54:08<br>Eric<br>Noise No, I mean, look, I'm just I'm contrarian, right? Like, I think that the benefits need to necessarily be spoken to of the ETF. Like, you know, I think that there's obviously a ton of indirect benefits. I did a thread this summer when it was first popping up just basically trying to walk through the idea of like we, I, I, I don't know.  </p>
<p>01:08:54:09 - 01:09:17:20<br>Eric<br>My take is I'm not sure that there is I'm not sure like some people that are very excited about it. I'm not sure that it isn't something that could become this big scary problem within a few years I think depending on how rapidly capital starts flowing into these vehicles. Like, I think we could get to a material influential point in the market.  </p>
<p>01:09:17:20 - 01:09:47:08<br>Eric<br>And like at the end of the day, I think influencing Bitcoin is it's just the purely social consensus or not social, but it's a purely consensus based. And there's all these different layers of consensus. You know, there's investor developer, miner, social, there's all these things that exist. And as really big players enter, the community in a rapid way that also hold the keys to freedom in other aspects, right?  </p>
<p>01:09:47:09 - 01:10:11:27<br>Eric<br>Like BlackRock is a very influential company. It's one of the most influential companies in the world, having them become a major stakeholder within the ecosystem in a variety of different forms, I think is I think it's a scary proposition and I don't know where that could lead, but I think that something like, Oh, it's fine if it's goodbye, our bags and all that, I don't think it's that simple.  </p>
<p>01:10:11:27 - 01:10:45:13<br>Eric<br>I think there are legitimate concerns and like this goes back to the point around we like building out the self sovereign peer to peer system. It needs to happen. It's happening. But I think that like we really need to be prioritizing it more and more. I think that we're kind of getting to this inflection point in growth and I am concerned about what that could do to the undermining freedom, enabling properties of Bitcoin if Wall Street gets pretty influential.  </p>
<p>01:10:45:15 - 01:10:54:24<br>Marty<br>Agree? I completely agree there. That's why I'm happy we're talking about this today in the midst of all this ETF madness. This is where the signal is in my mind.  </p>
<p>01:10:54:27 - 01:11:17:27<br>Eric<br>Yeah. And it's like, yeah, I don't know. But I mean it's it's awesome man like it's, it's kind of it's pretty surreal. I remember when I first got into all this and like, it was cool to me that the Winklevoss twins were on CNBC talking this. I remember like, Oh shit, like, this is awesome for Bitcoin. They're on CNBC and now it's like we're we're in everything all the time.  </p>
<p>01:11:17:27 - 01:11:19:19<br>Eric<br>I mean, even you get.  </p>
<p>01:11:19:22 - 01:11:22:14<br>Marty<br>CNBC like a Bitcoin podcast network these days.  </p>
<p>01:11:22:14 - 01:11:24:23<br>Eric<br>Yeah, I know. It's crazy.  </p>
<p>01:11:24:25 - 01:11:37:07<br>Marty<br>It's, it's a no, it is funny, like thinking back to when I got in, like, I think my big like, oh shit, we made it mom. It was like Coinbase on their debit card and if you like, use.  </p>
<p>01:11:37:09 - 01:11:37:21<br>Eric<br>Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:11:37:21 - 01:11:49:25<br>Marty<br>Back debit card to buy stuff. I was like, Oh, we made It's here. That's the thing. I've been I've been around Bitcoin for ten years now. That's one thing I've come to like it's and it's a long journey.  </p>
<p>01:11:49:27 - 01:11:52:04<br>Eric<br>Damn, ten years. That's sweet, man.  </p>
<p>01:11:52:07 - 01:12:05:27<br>Marty<br>We've come a long way. We're, uh, 15 years. And now it's going to happen. It's going to take longer than you originally expect, but it's going to happen much quicker than most people expect as well.  </p>
<p>01:12:06:00 - 01:12:30:04<br>Eric<br>Yeah, exactly. I think that's everything since I got into this industry, I feel like everything I've expected has happened drastically more quickly and I feel like all we are is a press release away from some sort of crazy news thing happening. And yeah, it's also funny too, because, you know, I, I jumped into all this basically. I started writing my book in 2020.  </p>
<p>01:12:30:07 - 01:12:53:22<br>Eric<br>I really started like talking to a lot of people in the industry in like 2021. A lot of kind of like a last cycle guy, and I'm just like a noob, but like, it's kind of funny because I'm starting to like make my first news cycle with a bunch of people coming and I'm like starting to see all the parallels and everything and like, you know, I was following things from a distance back in 2017.  </p>
<p>01:12:53:24 - 01:12:57:28<br>Eric<br>So this is like it's very different being involved in, the industry and having that perspective.  </p>
<p>01:12:58:00 - 01:13:00:03<br>Marty<br>What were you doing before?  </p>
<p>01:13:00:05 - 01:13:28:21<br>Eric<br>So I was working for a private equity fund and so I was so before that I was at FTI Consulting and I actually was a few years before Parker was there using the exact same group I was in Boston I worked for at my private equity fund was in Parker's class at our last company, their friends. But it was funny when I got into this and then I was talking to one guy at our group, he's like, Oh, like you should talk to Parker Lewis.  </p>
<p>01:13:28:24 - 01:13:50:10<br>Eric<br>And so funny. Yeah, Parker directed me to the Bitcoin standard and everything because like back then I was definitely a lot more like, I wasn't like I definitely saw the value in Bitcoin, but I was like way more open minded to the rest of crypto. And it was. Parker kind of pushing me Bitcoin standard direction that really helped me like be like, Oh, I see.  </p>
<p>01:13:50:10 - 01:13:53:24<br>Eric<br>Okay, it's not, it's not all the narratives being told.  </p>
<p>01:13:53:26 - 01:14:11:08<br>Marty<br>No money will converge to one. He just gave that presentation today at the Commons. Yeah. And that's fascinating how quickly in these cycles come in it's I've got pattern recognition. I think there's a third or fourth cycle now. It's like, holy shit, it's all happening.  </p>
<p>01:14:11:11 - 01:14:12:25<br>Eric<br>Yeah, that's wild, man.  </p>
<p>01:14:12:28 - 01:14:36:18<br>Marty<br>Another thing about the ETF and like the whole I agree with your your long term worries about the influence of BlackRock and others can have on Bitcoin's consensus layer the social consensus specifically and try to use their ability to throw around capital to try to force Bitcoin to do things. But I do also think this week was an incredible advertisement for bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:14:36:18 - 01:15:04:26<br>Marty<br>Like you had the SCC, so you had the SEC fumbled the announcement like three times and then like apparently behind the scenes, I'm not sure if you're hearing this, but it's complete chaos behind the scenes. In terms of the APIs, obviously you have Vanguard not allowing people to buy the the SEC fuck up as a complete, uh, validation of the fact that the government's completely incompetent and you shouldn't be trusting them.  </p>
<p>01:15:04:26 - 01:15:22:17<br>Marty<br>And who are they to regulate all this stuff and tell us what to do and what money we can use and what financial products we can get access to. And then the launch today and the the stark reminder of trusted third party risk. People like Vanguard saying like, no, you can't buy these ETFs. It's not in. Yeah, yeah.  </p>
<p>01:15:22:19 - 01:15:24:20<br>Marty<br>It's like, oh, that's poetic.  </p>
<p>01:15:24:22 - 01:15:45:06<br>Eric<br>It's poetic and it is cool. I was like, I was hanging out with a friend and I was just like, I, I can't believe it always is like this too. It's like this is just it's like the movie is unfolding and I like, tweeted. I was like, Gensler, it looks like such a joke. Now. They're definitely going to have like, some absurd character play him in the movie.  </p>
<p>01:15:45:06 - 01:15:56:15<br>Eric<br>It's going to be like Will Ferrell or something. He's just going to act like a crazy asshole or something and like, Yeah, it's wild, man. I couldn't believe it. What I thought was so bad ass was Esther Pierce's statement. Yeah, that led complete.  </p>
<p>01:15:56:15 - 01:15:59:10<br>Marty<br>Counter signal immediately after his letter.  </p>
<p>01:15:59:13 - 01:16:19:23<br>Eric<br>Yeah, that. That was really cool. And just like we have this divided house for the securities regulator of the largest capital markets in the world, and that it's such a canary in the coal mine for the reality of what's happening within fiat world. Think a lot of people are actually starting to see and it's becoming mainstream.  </p>
<p>01:16:19:25 - 01:16:50:28<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I mean, you have that rolling into an election cycle and one of the like I've been making, I have been thinking about Rome a lot lately. My wife asked me any day over the last month, Yes, I've been thinking about Romani, but the one thing like whether it's like the house divided at the FCC or this other signal, obviously inflation's high, but the one that really stuck in my mind for the last month is this all trend of active duty military members like going on tick tock.  </p>
<p>01:16:50:28 - 01:17:07:26<br>Marty<br>There was like a tick tock trend of these military members basically on duty somewhere in the world, like telling others like don't join the army, the money's not worth it. And that's like the one thing that led to the sacking of Rome was like when they couldn't pay their overextended military, they'd pay them. It wasn't bunkum at all.  </p>
<p>01:17:07:26 - 01:17:24:21<br>Marty<br>But today, fast forward thousands of years and we're having the same problem here in America. And again, it's a canary in, the coal mine that not many people have picked up on. When your military servicemen and women are actively telling others not to join because the pay isn't worth it, like the not worth it.  </p>
<p>01:17:24:21 - 01:17:28:09<br>Eric<br>That's that's wild. I hadn't heard about that. That's interesting.  </p>
<p>01:17:28:11 - 01:17:31:14<br>Marty<br>Yeah. It's a lot of canaries out there.  </p>
<p>01:17:31:16 - 01:18:04:06<br>Eric<br>Well, makes sense, too. I mean, like, I'm not an expert. Well, I guess, like, all my family is military, but like, in terms of, like, the way that it works today, I'm not as familiar with, like, I thought that there's some sort of with all of the like, school the education promise from is, you know, military compensation that they basically have all these restrictions on it so that you can pretty much only do these like bullshit online universities that don't really get you anywhere or I don't know if that's actually the case, but I was getting that impression.  </p>
<p>01:18:04:08 - 01:18:35:08<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Yeah. Um, it's, it's and then like, you look at the stat I ran last week doing a like retrospective on the first 15 years, focused on the financial system, like to see the ratio of national debt to M to 29 when Bitcoin launch was 1.26 we were at 8.7 trillion and M two and 10.7 in national debt today forward to January 2024.  </p>
<p>01:18:35:08 - 01:18:48:04<br>Marty<br>That ratio is 1.68. We're at 21 trillion in M2 and 34 trillion in debt. And so just thinking of something, that ratio needs to revert to the mean back towards 1.26.  </p>
<p>01:18:48:04 - 01:18:49:02<br>Eric<br>The.  </p>
<p>01:18:49:05 - 01:19:01:04<br>Marty<br>Monetary base is going to expand. It's inflation problem is not going away. No matter how much the Biden administration would like you to believe that this.  </p>
<p>01:19:01:07 - 01:19:07:07<br>Eric<br>Yeah, it's going to be it's going to be wild, man. But I'm ready, man. It's going to be a good year.  </p>
<p>01:19:07:09 - 01:19:17:05<br>Marty<br>Excited and is going to be a good year. Eric Long time coming. I'm happy we waited, though, because I think this is a fascinating topic. We'll have to do it more. You have to come it in person. Well, to figure it out.  </p>
<p>01:19:17:07 - 01:19:21:21<br>Eric<br>Man, I do plan on getting that to us. And at some point, like I think first half of this year.  </p>
<p>01:19:21:21 - 01:19:38:22<br>Marty<br>So definitely come through the comments. It's a good vibe here, great vibes today where, I mean, we're going to link to this piece in the show notes will link to your book as well. What else do you want the first to know before we wrap up here, any final thoughts? Anywhere you want to send people.  </p>
<p>01:19:38:23 - 01:19:52:25<br>Eric<br>Just Twitter for me. Yeah, I mean, that's kind of where I run my life out of the DM's on Twitter for the most part. So yeah it is it me up there, it's just my name and yeah and so.  </p>
<p>01:19:52:27 - 01:19:59:16<br>Marty<br>We'll link to that as well. Eric Keep crushing it. We're going to win. Crazy time to be alive.  </p>
<p>01:19:59:19 - 01:20:01:19<br>Eric<br>I tell you. Thanks, man.  </p>
<p>01:20:01:22 - 01:20:03:00<br>Marty<br>Peace and love for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[Scrib]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/banks-without-bankers/">Read original post</a></p>
<h1>Key Takeaways</h1>
<h2>Core Topics, Themes, and Insights</h2>
<p>The TFTC episode delves into the potential of Bitcoin and its underlying technology to revolutionize the banking industry by creating banks without bankers. Marty and his guest, Eric Yakes, author of "<a href="https://www.amazon.com.au/7th-Property-Bitcoin-Monetary-Revolution/dp/0578902621?ref=tftc.io">The 7th Property: Bitcoin and the Monetary Revolution</a>," discuss how Bitcoin's open-source protocol and the layers being built on top of it enable new means of financial interactions that could eventually replace traditional banking systems.</p>
<p>One of the key topics covered is the concept of "FediMints" or federated mints, which are essentially decentralized platforms that allow users to exchange Bitcoin for eCash tokens. These tokens can be used for private, efficient transactions, operating on a trust model that leverages multi-signature technology and cryptographic protocols to minimize risk and optimize agency problems historically associated with banks.</p>
<p>Additionally, the podcast touches on the importance of self-custody and how service providers like River encourage it through their products. The conversation also examines the role of new technologies such as the Lightning Network, liquid networks, and FedMints in scaling Bitcoin and reducing reliance on traditional financial systems.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the episode acknowledges the anniversary of Hal Finney's prescient post about Bitcoin enabling a free banking system and how current developments are bringing that vision closer to reality.</p>
<h2>Links</h2>
<p>Follow Eric on <a href="https://twitter.com/ericyakes?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>Check out <a href="https://www.axiombtc.capital/banks?ref=tftc.io"><em>Banks Without Bankers</em></a></p>
<p>Check out <a href="https://www.amazon.com.au/7th-Property-Bitcoin-Monetary-Revolution/dp/0578902621?ref=tftc.io"><em>The 7th Property: Bitcoin and the Monetary Revolution</em></a></p>
<h2>Sponsors</h2>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<h2>Best Quotes</h2>
<ul>
<li>"We have this open-source protocol and all these layers being built on top of it that enable completely new ways of interacting with money and financial services." - Marty<ul>
<li>Context: Marty emphasizes the innovative potential of Bitcoin's technology stack beyond just fitting into existing financial systems.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>"Can we really have a future where we have banks without bankers?" - Marty<ul>
<li>Context: Marty poses a critical question that challenges the traditional concept of banking and opens up discussion for decentralized alternatives.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>"I think that a lot of the debate comes from, is it like there's this binary way that we're going to be thinking about our financial system... Or is this actually more of a spectrum of trust models?" - Eric Yakes<ul>
<li>Context: Eric suggests that the future financial ecosystem built around Bitcoin may not be a simple dichotomy but rather a spectrum involving various trust models.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>"The goal of Bitcoin... is I think it needs to be a settlement layer for a neutral monetary system." - Eric Yakes<ul>
<li>Context: Eric discusses his vision for Bitcoin as a fundamental layer for a new, politically unbiased monetary system.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>"Imagine a system where users dollar cost average into Bitcoin via Arc, use federated technology for custody, and eCash as the private cash balance for everyday transactions." - Eric Yakes<ul>
<li>Context: Eric paints a picture of a future financial ecosystem that fully leverages Bitcoin and associated technologies.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The podcast episode with Marty and Eric Yakes presents a nuanced perspective on how Bitcoin's protocols and emerging technologies like FediMints have the potential to disrupt traditional banking systems. The discussion highlights the importance of self-custody, the role of trust models, and the vision for a decentralized, neutral monetary system that can operate without the need for bankers.</p>
<p>While the conversation acknowledges the current momentum of Bitcoin ETFs and their mainstream appeal, there is a strong undercurrent of belief that the true transformational change lies in the development of native Bitcoin technologies that empower individuals and reduce reliance on centralized financial institutions.</p>
<p>The episode concludes with a reflective message that, despite regulatory challenges and the complexities of new technology, the movement toward a Bitcoin-driven financial future is gaining momentum, and the community must prioritize building out self-sovereign systems to preserve Bitcoin's freedom-enabling properties.</p>
<p>In summary, the podcast not only provides valuable insights into the current state of Bitcoin and its integration with the financial world but also posits thought-provoking ideas about its future trajectory, urging listeners to engage with and contribute to this evolving space.</p>
<h2>Timestamps</h2>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>6:40 - Can we really have banks without bankers?<br>12:44 - Tradeoffs<br>16:10 - Fedimints<br>23:48 - Federated model cost/benefit<br>35:23 - Implementing incentives<br>42:08 - Fedi in the future<br>45:53 - Speculating on possibilities<br>51:35 - Mint distribution and crossing chasms<br>59:23 - Ark<br>1:07:57 - Spoiling final thoughts<br>1:11:31 - Multi-institution custody<br>1:15:03 - ETF<br>1:22:59 - Falling empire<br>1:25:46 - Wrapping up</p>
<h2>Transcript</h2>
<p>00:00:01:23 - 00:00:33:18<br>Marty<br>Suffixes. Boy Marty bent here in another episode of Tootsie on a momentous day in Bitcoin's history. ETFs officially started trading. Everybody is making fun of Vanguard and others who are blocking people from buying the Bitcoin ETFs. We're here with Eric Yates to talk about something that's actually cool replacing the banks with Bitcoin. Eric is the author of the Seventh Property Bitcoin in the Monetary Revolution, and he recently wrote a post for Axiom Banks Without Bankers.  </p>
<p>00:00:33:20 - 00:00:58:17<br>Marty<br>And it's actually also fresh in that we're talking about this today, Eric, because it's the anniversary of the running Bitcoin or the day after the anniversary of the running Bitcoin tweet by Hal Finney and how Finney is known in the space for writing a very prescient blog post, our forum post Bitcoin Talk talk on December 30th, 2010, talking about how Bitcoin would enable a free banking system.  </p>
<p>00:00:58:22 - 00:01:06:10<br>Marty<br>In your piece really dives into how we can do that natively on Bitcoin. So first, welcome to the show. Thank you for joining us.  </p>
<p>00:01:06:12 - 00:01:09:09<br>Eric<br>Yeah, thanks man. It's been a long time coming.  </p>
<p>00:01:09:11 - 00:01:32:19<br>Marty<br>Really has. And I'm very excited we waited this long because I think this particular topic is fascinating, important in flying under the radar right now as the narrative with the ETFs is that bitcoin's merging with the incumbent financial system is going to become a part of the banking system, the financial system, and it's just going to fit in to what has already been built.  </p>
<p>00:01:32:23 - 00:01:52:29<br>Marty<br>And a lot of the people that are pushing this narrative, in my opinion, are completely neglecting the fact that we have this open source protocol and all these layers being built on top of it that enable completely new ways of interacting with money in financial services. And this is really what you dove into in your piece. Banks without bankers.  </p>
<p>00:01:53:05 - 00:01:58:09<br>Marty<br>So can we really have a future where we have banks without bankers?  </p>
<p>00:01:58:12 - 00:02:26:12<br>Eric<br>I think it's like I was actually watching the what Bitcoin did with Giacomo and John Carvalho and Matt Carollo last night. And, you know, they're getting deep into the scaling debate. And it was interesting because they kind of framed some of these topics in a way that I guess I didn't frame it in my paper this way, but I think it's it's helpful context because I think, you know, probably a good amount of listeners are probably thinking about it the similar way.  </p>
<p>00:02:26:14 - 00:02:59:21<br>Eric<br>But, you know, the framing it from the perspective of like there's the custodial banking type models and then there's the unilateral exit type models. One is kind of a part of Bitcoin, one isn't. And or at least John I think was framing it this way. And then I think that like a lot of the debate comes from is it like they're this binary way that we're going to be thinking about our financial system and the ecosystem built around Bitcoin or is this actually more of a spectrum of trust models that we're looking at?  </p>
<p>00:02:59:23 - 00:03:23:12<br>Eric<br>And depending on the use case, depending on the technology, depending on the timing and depending on, you know, what consumers are ultimately demanding or where on that spectrum are we going to fall in terms of the amount of trust and how much custody really exists within the system? And I feel like that's kind of a key debate. And like I view this as much more of a spectrum.  </p>
<p>00:03:23:12 - 00:03:42:25<br>Eric<br>I think that, you know, you can't the second that you take these ideas and you bring things to extremes, and that's kind of what I try to do at the beginning of the paper to say like, we have this world where we have all custodial, you know, digital gold, 2.0 Bitcoin. It has the same, you know, freedom enabling qualities as a bumper sticker.  </p>
<p>00:03:42:27 - 00:04:05:10<br>Eric<br>And, you know, we get a $12 trillion market cap and a lot of the innovations in the technology is wasted. At the other end of the spectrum, we have this completely, you know, decentralized, permissionless, peer to peer, global neutral, apolitical type monetary system. And and that also seems a bit extreme given the constraints that we're aware of at a technological level.  </p>
<p>00:04:05:12 - 00:04:24:28<br>Eric<br>And I think a lot of my writing tries to focus on, you know, how these systems are going to be optimized, where I think we're going to have self custodial use cases, and that's going to be a very large material proportion of the market. I'm not really sure what that comes out to. I think that there is some sort of, you know, theoretical amount.  </p>
<p>00:04:24:28 - 00:04:56:21<br>Eric<br>It's like there needs to be X proportion of Bitcoin within this economy that is ultimately self custodial. And if it's not, and if people can exit into that system voluntarily to a degree, then there is a risk of political capture in the long run over the system. So I think that's one of the goals, is the whole system doesn't need to be this purely self custodial, decentralized system, but it needs to be enough to act as a deterrence mechanism against political capture of the system.  </p>
<p>00:04:56:21 - 00:05:24:02<br>Eric<br>I think as long as political capture isn't influencing the financial system, then a lot of the problems that we witnessed with banking systems throughout history start to go away. And it doesn't mean they're perfect, but at least they're free markets and and people get to choose what they want in. Banks can respond to that. And the argument that I'm basically making to try to sell out in the paper is that I think that when it comes to custodial models, we can use cryptography to optimize some of the agency problems that have existed in banks for a long time.  </p>
<p>00:05:24:04 - 00:05:59:07<br>Eric<br>And those innovations are still occurring with builders today within the ecosystem. And I think that we're really optimizing agency in different ways to where I see the custodial market probably being significant, drastically different than what it's been historically. And we could probably get this hyper efficient, informational, transparent financial system to emerge from the first time. And like from my perspective, if the goal of Bitcoin and I think people have different goals of it, I like my goal for Bitcoin is I think it needs to be a settlement layer for a neutral monetary system, just needs to be a monetary system influenced by any particular person.  </p>
<p>00:05:59:10 - 00:06:07:04<br>Eric<br>And I think if we can achieve that, then that's going to change the world in a significant way and that's why these questions matter so much.  </p>
<p>00:06:07:06 - 00:06:39:07<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I completely agree. I think it goes to both extremes. I'm sorry, someone's coming in. Your stuff right there behind you. So people take it to both extremes and say like, we need everybody to be self-sovereign or it's going to be completely covered by the financial system. And I mean, again, going back to Hell's Post, I think as Bitcoiners, we need to recognize the fundamental limitations, particularly at the protocol level, and make it literally impossible.  </p>
<p>00:06:39:07 - 00:06:58:08<br>Marty<br>There's no way on earth that you can have a UTX for each person, let alone a large portion of the global population. And with that in mind, I think you have to accept that there are tradeoffs, and that's why the Lightning Network exists. We'll talk about 30 minutes a lot this up. So that's why they exist. Why liquid exist.  </p>
<p>00:06:58:15 - 00:07:35:03<br>Marty<br>That's why exchanges exist to a certain extent. And it's becoming comfortable with those tradeoffs, but at the same time, making sure the tradeoffs that are made are worthwhile and do preserve the neutral state of the network that you that you explained. And I think that's makes a lot of people butthurt. But it is the reality. Like unless we get covenants and some ability to do partial ownership of UTX as in yeah, maybe we can scale to more people, but even that comes with some cost tradeoffs that probably will price people out in the long run.  </p>
<p>00:07:35:05 - 00:08:07:13<br>Eric<br>Exactly. It's until we solve this fundamental economic problem of, you know, efficiency, the tradeoff between efficiency and neutrality or security or however you want to frame it, we're always going to be dealing with this. But I think that like the one one framework that I think kind of in the same way that we think about how this fiat system has created malinvestment throughout the economy, the political capture, the system has created a lot of mal agency.  </p>
<p>00:08:07:19 - 00:08:24:16<br>Eric<br>So like that's that's kind of like how we start to break it down fundamentally to the economic problem. Bitcoin solved agency for like basically a settlement. We have all the properties of gold. We made it much more efficient. It can do a lot more things now and it's much better than the US dollar settlement system today as well.  </p>
<p>00:08:24:16 - 00:08:45:24<br>Eric<br>So we created this new innovation, that self agency. All these people that were formerly involved in this have been automated away in a trustless way, and we can do that permissionless way now. So that's that's a major innovation. And I think that we're in the same way that Bitcoin applied cryptography in cleverly aligned incentives to make that happen.  </p>
<p>00:08:45:27 - 00:09:02:29<br>Eric<br>I think that we can do a similar thing where there's like this MAL agency and all these other financial functions that exist when it comes to like the different means of payment. There would be use and how many service providers are required to create verification between different means of payments, between banking systems. It just is bloated, it's inefficient.  </p>
<p>00:09:03:04 - 00:09:31:10<br>Eric<br>It's a lot of it's just there because of the administrative burdens that regulatory environments create. And and, you know, the barriers to entry and the lack of competition that that creates to. So it's I think a lot of it is really just we could kill off a lot of this mal agency within financial functions in significantly improve the study of banking models by doing that.  </p>
<p>00:09:31:12 - 00:09:57:07<br>Marty<br>And so how to Fetterman is playing to this in your mind versus explain sediments because I have been bullish on even since Eric dropped the first email on the mailing list came out the prototype when him I believe Casey wrote Armor and Obi were on stage at Bitcoin 2022 explaining 30 minutes. And then obviously it's actually even more precious that we're talking now.  </p>
<p>00:09:57:07 - 00:10:19:01<br>Marty<br>You had 30 minute version 0.2.1 drop last week, which is the first sort of stable release that people can feel confident building on. Everything from here on out will be backwards compatible. So it seems like sediments are officially released and able to be built on in the wild in a somewhat reliable fashion.  </p>
<p>00:10:19:04 - 00:10:38:21<br>Eric<br>Yeah, like I view, I guess I'll start with a view of sediment as it's just a technology and, and I think that there's a lot of different ways that it could be applied. I think that there's different narratives. There's, there's all these narratives that have emerged around what a sediment can be. And so I'm probably deriving my that's what I am doing.  </p>
<p>00:10:38:21 - 00:11:06:02<br>Eric<br>This piece is driving my own narratives about it. I could be dead wrong. Other people could be dead wrong, and we'll see how it's ultimately applied. But fundamentally, a sediment is a set of protocols that's designed to be compatible with the Bitcoin network and the lightning Network. That is enabling a less constrained means of payment is kind of how I categorize it.  </p>
<p>00:11:06:02 - 00:11:44:23<br>Eric<br>Like when we think about how we're scaling Bitcoin and then we think about some of the problems that lightning is running into where inbound liquidity is this major issue. And we think that that might incentivize centralization of the network over time. And lightning has a set of benefits. I think that cash is this it's this optimization towards okay, it's the least constrained means of payment that is also, you know, nearly best practices in terms of privacy, if not the and, you know, it doesn't require the inefficiency of a blockchain.  </p>
<p>00:11:44:25 - 00:12:11:21<br>Eric<br>It is just a bear asset very similar to like a cash instrument. Now that requires taking on a lot more trust. So we have to send Bitcoin to a multisig address and then they use it. Chemi and Brian Signature protocol to issue you an E cash token. And that happens, right? If you're using it from a mobile app on your phone, then you literally have memory for this e cash token on your phone, just like it would be like having cash in your wallet.  </p>
<p>00:12:11:21 - 00:12:33:17<br>Eric<br>If you lose your wallet, it's got there's ways of backing it up and other things. But, you know, and I won't get into technical details around that, but there's definitely solutions. So it's not just like if you drop your phone in the toilet, your money's gone, but but in any event, this is like another means of payment in the same way that, you know, for a while I was kind of like, Is lightning the same thing as Bitcoin?  </p>
<p>00:12:33:19 - 00:12:53:03<br>Eric<br>It has different trust, it has different security tradeoffs with operating in that kind of a system. And I think ultimately what it comes out down to is I think it's better to think about these things as a different means of payment in the same way that, you know, we have cash checks, wires, all these other different means of payment for a U.S. dollar or medium of exchange.  </p>
<p>00:12:53:05 - 00:13:18:15<br>Eric<br>And we have protocols emerging on Bitcoin that I think are doing similar things. So sediments are depositing your Bitcoin to a multisig address and trying to optimize that address based on trust and then receiving any cash token in return that allows you to very cheaply, privately, efficiently transact with people so that you can try to minimize. And it doesn't it's not perfect, right?  </p>
<p>00:13:18:16 - 00:13:45:20<br>Eric<br>We still have to figure out, you know, how to reduce on chain footprint and but putting that aside, I think that having like an E cash token is something that out of all the custodial models, as opposed to just having an account in an exchange out of all the custodial models, this is effectively like this, a way of minimizing trust by using federated technology for custody and optimizing your trust around who you want to trust.  </p>
<p>00:13:45:20 - 00:14:14:22<br>Eric<br>And like, that's the key ingredient, I think, when it comes to trust is we need to create tools that allow us to we need to create tools that make the marginal cost of moving our trust as low as possible. So when you think about depositing into a bank and trusting a bank with different things and how you would verify your trust in that bank, it's very opaque, very expensive process.  </p>
<p>00:14:14:24 - 00:14:34:29<br>Eric<br>And I think what we're doing with some of these technologies is we're leveraging cryptography to make a lot of that actually very cheap. So it's like, I don't have to trust one single point of failure. I could just a federation of people have multiple keys. I can optimize that. Not to be some random bank that's like, you know, I've never used before but just has the utility that I want.  </p>
<p>00:14:35:02 - 00:15:02:06<br>Eric<br>But I can actually have the key holders be people who I trust that I know in my day to day life, the same way that we trust people and we know in our day to day lives with everything else, there's a possibility for that. It also could be institutionalized. There's different ways that it could be done. You could often optimize trust in a different way, but nonetheless, by using a technology that allows us to apply our chops to one group, immediately, be able to exit that group very efficiently and move to another group on this digital format.  </p>
<p>00:15:02:08 - 00:15:30:08<br>Eric<br>I think it creates a much cheaper way for us to do that. And that's even similar to the innovation of like share custodial models with the Multisig transaction, right? Like until Bitcoin and we could create these Multi-signature transaction schemes. There wasn't really a cheap way of having like a shared custodial scheme. It was a much more inefficient hands on approach that you would have to go through with the relationship with the bank.  </p>
<p>00:15:30:10 - 00:15:54:04<br>Eric<br>And we're like, sure. Cassidy is push the marginal cost of creating that, you know, very, very low. And and I think that we're yet to see the economic benefits that come for this new shared custodial. A lot of the innovations that I think that are going to emerge from shared custodial models and so like that's that's kind of the first piece of like what is effective in how it ties.  </p>
<p>00:15:54:04 - 00:16:16:17<br>Eric<br>I think it's it's optimizing for agency around custodial models by using federated architecture. And then I think the next big distinction between it and like something like liquid or any other application of a blockchain is that it's not a blockchain, it's simply just a bare instrument that's private, similar to how many means of payment we have today. And that's one of the key questions, right?  </p>
<p>00:16:16:17 - 00:16:43:09<br>Eric<br>Like how many times do we need to be applying a blockchain for something? How public do we want a lot of things to be? Auditability is important in some cases, and the argument is to achieve auditability, do you need to have a consensus mechanism and a blockchain, or is there better methods of doing that as well? If we don't want out of the ability for something, then something like cash is probably an ideal construct by not leveraging a blockchain because it's not constrained.  </p>
<p>00:16:43:11 - 00:17:10:18<br>Eric<br>And I think that's one of the next major innovations, something that makes it pretty unique to anything else that's really come is it's at this confluence of distinctions kind of such a level between how it interacts with base chain, the actual asset in the way that cache set up and then like the capacity constraints around that too. So I guess that's that's probably a good place to stop on like the overview of it.  </p>
<p>00:17:10:20 - 00:17:40:15<br>Marty<br>And digging into the particular tradeoffs of the trust model. Obviously, since it's Federated, I think to begin, because that's the other thing. We like these Federated Charming Mints. They operate in this regulatory gray area, if you will. So we'll probably be a lot of quasi anonymous mints popping up. The quasi anonymous pseudo anonymous Federated members controlling the Mint.  </p>
<p>00:17:40:17 - 00:18:10:24<br>Marty<br>And ideally, if this were this technology, which I would argue is technologically superior than the incumbent system on many levels, like if you were to run with the assumption that, like people come to their senses and recognize that we have a much better technology to do these things and allow people to basically create this free banking system that Hal Finney wrote about in 2010 and publicly market like, Hey, yes, I'm a Federation member.  </p>
<p>00:18:10:24 - 00:18:57:09<br>Marty<br>In this particular Mint, you could basically do a trust analysis of the Federation members and whether or not you trust them to actually sign transactions and to make sure that they don't run you, they don't steal Bitcoin collude to steal Bitcoin from the mint. And again, playing a, uh, a hypothetical where the world comes to a senses and you're able to have this free market competition for mint users by federation members, and they're basically competing on reputation, their ability to successfully facilitate Mint operations like that is significantly better than going to a JPMorgan and trusting Jamie Dimon and his board of directors and all their managers to manage their singular bank correctly.  </p>
<p>00:18:57:12 - 00:19:35:03<br>Marty<br>That's like the one you're distributing that trust amongst multiple stakeholders who, if they were able to be public, were probably unlikely to collude because they'll probably have other business operations and they want to ruin their whole business reputation on just colluding to to rug a mint, specifically by the number two. The privacy benefit is massive, where if you enter mint and you engage in commerce using these cash tokens, the likelihood that you will get debunked because you made a transaction that the bank did not agree with.  </p>
<p>00:19:35:03 - 00:19:46:05<br>Marty<br>From a political perspective like that is simply impossible because, yes, the bank can see that people are spending in cash tokens, but they don't really know exactly who.  </p>
<p>00:19:46:07 - 00:20:12:05<br>Eric<br>Right, Right. Yeah. And I, I think that like so there's and I feel like a lot of people talk about some of these like the benefits of something like a petty mint at a micro level but I think there's two primary frames, there's the micro and then there's the macro, the systemic level. And in how could this work is like an actual banking system.  </p>
<p>00:20:12:05 - 00:20:35:17<br>Eric<br>And that's where a lot of the free banking theory starts to come in. And I think that that's what I was thinking about. I think that Hal hadn't considered the ways that we could apply innovative new technologies to building out a free banking system natively. I think it is describing it as like the system of like banks and competing notes.  </p>
<p>00:20:35:17 - 00:21:05:26<br>Eric<br>It's like he he was thinking it as more of like the analog type structure and and I think that what a lot can be done to actually remove trust and you know actual bankers from like many of these functions can be automated as well and and I think that's kind of like the distinction only when you get into like the free banking theory, I guess I could I could just give like a quick overview on what that is.  </p>
<p>00:21:05:29 - 00:21:28:10<br>Eric<br>It's basically the idea is that from the point at which we moved out of direct monetary medium settlement to note based systems, and that was kind of like the dawn of our modern banking systems. And, you know, at least within the Western world, this emerged around the 17th century. It's because money had to keep up with technology, right?  </p>
<p>00:21:28:10 - 00:22:08:29<br>Eric<br>And after we had like the printing press emerge and people realized that conducting trade over long distances using precious metals was a very expensive task. If we were to tested our assets within a bank that can issue and notes and we can use, you know, eventually we had the telegraph for it, but now we can use paper receipts to conduct trade with the trust, assuming that is, you know, that that was a very efficient mechanism, that was a scaling mechanism from the precious metal era that emerged and and governments very quickly co-opted that system because it's opaque and it creates centralized control over the asset.  </p>
<p>00:22:09:03 - 00:22:37:09<br>Eric<br>So it was it was a prime example of how political capture can occur very quickly. When we saw the history of what happened with the Bank of England and how central banking first emerged, because there is a natural need to create these branched tree based structures within the financial system so that you can optimize for highways and roads and, you know, streets on a neighborhood and and the governments could take advantage of the highways.  </p>
<p>00:22:37:12 - 00:23:00:11<br>Eric<br>So I think that the whole goal is, you know, how do we keep these things free? And, you know, luckily we have a few examples in history where they were relatively free and they weren't captured by governments. Of course, all of these things are a spectrum. It's not some sort of like binary consideration. A lot of people think about the U.S. wildcat banking system is like free banking.  </p>
<p>00:23:00:11 - 00:23:26:06<br>Eric<br>I think if you get into the literature, or at least it's a lot, I wouldn't consider that to be a good example or even definitely definitionally accurate to call it free banking. There is a lot of government influence, like there is bond collateral laws where banks weren't allowed to freely choose what what they wanted to use as a reserve asset, and they did have to have a certain percentage in their state level bonds.  </p>
<p>00:23:26:09 - 00:23:46:15<br>Eric<br>I think it was like I think New England was like the first to implement that type of policy. And in all these things, you know, they stuck with the market incentives and things don't go very well When you start to market incentives. But the two primary examples that are lean Dodd is in the Scottish free banking system and the Canadian free banking system.  </p>
<p>00:23:46:15 - 00:24:08:11<br>Eric<br>Those were in like the 18th and 19th centuries and like the Scottish free banking system was certainly not perfect. And of course, when you have market based systems and you have governments influencing other things like war and their competing international banking systems, it's very hard to operate in a free way when you have these types of considerations that are shocking your system over time.  </p>
<p>00:24:08:13 - 00:24:31:09<br>Eric<br>But nonetheless, the Scottish free banking system lasted for over a century, and and it allowed banks to freely conduct commerce in the way that they did. And that meant like in the early days of the system, they were fractionally reserving it like 20%, 10 to 20% range. And then over time, that started to come down pretty significantly. I think that there is there's a lot of arguments as to why.  </p>
<p>00:24:31:12 - 00:24:57:10<br>Eric<br>I think the majority of it is that that's pretty much how that's how much they could get away with given the market efficiency in the information transparency. But you know, like in the Keynesian direction, those economists did make an argument that like by fractionally reserving and expanding credit, it's a response to a natural market demand and it's facilitating a need within an economy.  </p>
<p>00:24:57:10 - 00:25:19:22<br>Eric<br>And that's why it occurred. And and I think that I don't really agree with that, but I think that it's one of these things that while I don't believe fractional reserve is just true, I would fall on the side where if a free market chooses something, I'd prefer that to be a case. I think that some Austrians would fall on the side that you know.  </p>
<p>00:25:19:24 - 00:25:39:11<br>Eric<br>I think so, yes. This was a good example of one who believes that the government should intervene. And, you know, make it so the fractional reserve doesn't exist within the banking system. And I don't think that's right either. But, you know, there's different views on like what the solution is. And generally where it follows that should be an actual market mechanism.  </p>
<p>00:25:39:11 - 00:26:00:22<br>Eric<br>But what we saw in those systems was it was a natural market mechanism. And in these free banking systems, they were good in terms of, you know, these were prosperous periods oftentimes. And in the ideas that they were creating economic wealth, whether that was from credit or just because we had an efficient system in general is a highly debated topic amongst economists.  </p>
<p>00:26:00:22 - 00:26:32:23<br>Eric<br>But nonetheless, I think that like taking that background on free banking, I think that a lot of the reasons that those systems ended up in fractional reserve and a digital world with the Internet, with base settlement layer assets that have a unilateral exit or a fallback to a system of a, you know, peer to peer for the first time in history, I think that that incentive creates a new vector of competition within banking systems that fundamentally changes the incentives.  </p>
<p>00:26:32:23 - 00:27:11:23<br>Eric<br>And because of that, I think that we could actually have very hyper efficient information like transparent systems. And I think sediment is one protocol that could be a part of that potentially, as well as the Lightning Network, as well as other concepts that are currently emerging. And and I think that if we can achieve that, we could actually create something that is that is a truly neutral type of monetary system and provides a consumer experience that we want that I think the goal is going back to the point of like optimizing around agency.  </p>
<p>00:27:12:00 - 00:27:38:20<br>Eric<br>I think that a lot of people are looking at the scaling debates from purely a technological standpoint. And while I think that's incredibly valuable and incredibly important, I'm starting to think that by accepting trust in certain areas or in actually just coming up with clever ways to align incentives, that is probably a way that we're actually going to have innovation emerge within these protocols in the way that they interact with one another.  </p>
<p>00:27:38:20 - 00:28:07:18<br>Eric<br>We might be able to accomplish things that we hadn't been able to accomplish before in prior financial systems. So I think that that's that's one of the key things that like learning from what Bitcoin did, we can apply to some of these other protocols where Bitcoin wasn't just combining, you know, digital signature algorithms and hash functions and blockchain database structure.  </p>
<p>00:28:07:21 - 00:28:36:12<br>Eric<br>And, you know, it wasn't just a combination of these technologies, but it was cleverly aligning the incentives of all of these technologies, putting in the final missing piece of proof of work and a difficulty adjustment, and then having that all work. And it's like, that's a really beautiful thing, getting that, getting the incentives to align properly and then building a community and a culture that enables that to persist is I think I think that that you could argue, is one of the primary innovations that exists within Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>00:28:36:12 - 00:28:45:01<br>Eric<br>And and I think that that's what we're trying to accomplish today within other trust models.  </p>
<p>00:28:45:03 - 00:28:54:13<br>Marty<br>And particularly with settlements. How do you view that incentive, the proper incentive system? For me.  </p>
<p>00:28:54:16 - 00:29:15:15<br>Eric<br>It's like like I like I don't know, right. But like I write about some ideas that I think are interesting. I think a good example of this is like, okay, so we're accepting trust going into a multisig and then we might be able to optimize that. We might get roads, but we're going to use this cash, it's going to be a lot more efficient.  </p>
<p>00:29:15:18 - 00:29:39:00<br>Eric<br>And then the questions like, okay, going back to that point about how like shared custodial models like making the cost of shared custody approach, the marginal cost is like approaching a very low amount and we can apply a very similar thing to the verification of a bank itself, right? Like do you ferryman in bank? And it doesn't even have this like auditable blockchain.  </p>
<p>00:29:39:08 - 00:30:02:11<br>Eric<br>But I think it was really cool. Is this proposal that Kayleigh, who created the Cashew Protocol, which is also need cash protocol, leveraging lightning and not using federated technology, but he created this proposal that is developed at the first time I actually read about it was from the script project in 2017, but it was much more developed around the idea of verifying bank runs effectively.  </p>
<p>00:30:02:11 - 00:30:43:20<br>Eric<br>It's like basically creating an automated bank run system and it's like, okay, so if we were to implement this and say like wallet technologies, your wallet, you're interacting with the sentiment and your wallet will only participate in sediments that abide by this kind of standard. And we see that today in the financial economy for a lot of things, like there's certain accreditations that exist and there's people that only deal with or there's natural industry standards that emerge based on certain accreditations or best practices that firms need to follow, you know, like audits being a great example and this is kind of just like a way of a much cheaper way of conducting automated forms of  </p>
<p>00:30:43:20 - 00:31:14:04<br>Eric<br>audit on a settlement, because if anything, it does have the ability to produce reports of how much cash it's issued. You can't say who has it or where, but it can give you total of that. So like we could actually audit the fractional reserve. The question is, is what the meant is reporting true and with the scheme that he's proposing, it's basically like if you're a mint and you publicly commit to rotating your cash like equally with your has to be anything called a one year or two year exploration on it.  </p>
<p>00:31:14:06 - 00:31:40:27<br>Eric<br>And then you produce like publicly auditable, you catch tokens in the form of like a mint proof and you produce publicly audible redemptions of cash tokens. Then you can find what the net difference would be between and how mints, which is they would either if they issue too many, they would try to make fake redemptions or they could make fake issuance.  </p>
<p>00:31:40:29 - 00:32:03:13<br>Eric<br>And there's ways in which consumers can actually voluntarily report or catch a mint if their cash token doesn't exist within the list because it was arbitrarily burned from their list and they're not reporting it. Or on the other side, if you know, nobody else really sees a way that they could find any. So there are some fake things that nobody else can verify.  </p>
<p>00:32:03:16 - 00:32:29:16<br>Eric<br>None of these provide. It's like a consumer reporting type mechanism that can basically be audit automated within a wallet system. And none of these things create a perfect way of catching a mint. But what it does is it basically makes it probabilistically certain on a long enough timeline that a mint will get caught from running a fractional reserve, in which case that changes the incentives for the mint.  </p>
<p>00:32:29:16 - 00:32:48:08<br>Eric<br>It's not a perfect technological solution, but it changes the incentives of the Mint so that the members just say, okay, well, am I going to pursue this as a long term business model because I know that you're going to get caught. Maybe I won't try to drug anybody. I'm actually gonna try to pursue a full reserve. Or at the end of the spectrum, maybe the market demands it and that it does actually exist.  </p>
<p>00:32:48:08 - 00:33:25:06<br>Eric<br>But if the market doesn't demand it, I think that there's ways to create to capture and isolate the goal of information transparency within a trusted system without actually having to be fully transparent with like an auditable public ledger. And I think that's a really cool innovation, right? I think that having something like that is it's it's it's a leveraging cryptography to allow us to reveal and find information that we choose with optionality rather than having it be for us.  </p>
<p>00:33:25:07 - 00:33:47:22<br>Eric<br>Like how much public data is being revealed on blockchains being arbitrarily applied to all these systems, It's either irrelevant or completely unnecessary to be revealed, and we can create systems that are actually much more efficient with how we're doing that and allow us to achieve the goal of we really just want to audit this bank to make sure we're not just getting slow, but ideally we have a federated system with a group of people we trust and we're not going to get robbed overnight.  </p>
<p>00:33:47:24 - 00:34:12:17<br>Eric<br>And if that is the case, then the question is, well, maybe they have an incentive to try to slower, I guess, over time by increasing the amount of cash tokens at a very, very small amount and making a small amount. And eventually we get to this more extreme fractional reserve point over a decade. This would create an incentive where it's very cheap to verify against that, to apply this to like analog banking situations.  </p>
<p>00:34:12:17 - 00:34:39:03<br>Eric<br>It's like how do people create in automate bank runs on a bank? In our system today you can it's just like you don't even know who like there's no way to like actually automate these kind of things. And then when you consider the withdrawals and the crisis that occurred at the beginning of this year or last year with the most recent banking crises, like they were blaming that stuff on mobile money schemes and they're saying, oh, the runs are happening so much more rapidly because of mobile money.  </p>
<p>00:34:39:03 - 00:35:00:27<br>Eric<br>It's like, imagine what we can create in the system and what runs would look like. And and that's when I started thinking about a distraction. I'm like, damn, like this is going to be really freaking efficient. I don't know if you can unless, like, there's an economic benefit of running a fractional reserve institution that I don't particularly seem aware of, but we can always have credit issued in other ways.  </p>
<p>00:35:00:27 - 00:35:14:03<br>Eric<br>It doesn't have to be through fractional reserve. And so, like, unless that's the case, I would presume that we're probably going to create a system so efficient that we're not really going to see that happening unless it's fraud or something.  </p>
<p>00:35:14:05 - 00:35:20:29<br>Marty<br>Yeah, and there's no lender of last resort in this model either, so that just increases the risk way more sake.  </p>
<p>00:35:20:29 - 00:35:29:13<br>Eric<br>And there's a self-sovereign peer to peer competitor as well. And, and that increases it even more to.  </p>
<p>00:35:29:15 - 00:35:58:23<br>Marty<br>Yeah. So how do you and just curious because I'm curious of this as well just to see it play out, I'm sure we'll see over the next year or two how it does. And unfortunately, due to the regulatory landscape that exists in the world right now, we'll probably be more underground, more small niche communities building these mints. But in your ideal vision of settlements, succeeding to the level that we believe they can, what does it look like?  </p>
<p>00:35:58:23 - 00:36:28:12<br>Marty<br>Is it a world of communities spinning up their own mints and having community members join them in doing the Uncle Jim model, the Guardian model that Fed is really going after or do you see or not? Or yet do you see this becoming more professionalized where you have maybe Bitcoin companies with good reputations become federation members and spin up mints with other companies that they trust and others trust in the space?  </p>
<p>00:36:28:12 - 00:36:30:12<br>Marty<br>Or is it a combination of both?  </p>
<p>00:36:30:15 - 00:37:01:05<br>Eric<br>Yeah. Yeah. Like, you know, I, I, I guess like what do I think is most likely? It's like there's a lot of things I think I could see when it comes to what I think is most likely. It's like, where do I see Bitcoin in ten years? I see some sort of like concentration of developing economies is that are all opting into this neutral system and actually conducting trade and holding reserves in it.  </p>
<p>00:37:01:07 - 00:37:36:10<br>Eric<br>And it's kind of reached a critical mass and it's in the tens of trillions type value range. And I think that within those kind of economies we'd probably see federated e cash based community custodial models that exist in the obviously like within the KYC AML world. The questions like, okay, well, is E cash? The ideal method that would be leveraged is like a form of like, you know, de facto note issuance within developing economies.  </p>
<p>00:37:36:12 - 00:38:07:25<br>Eric<br>And that's something I don't know. I think like I guess like I don't know, my current thinking around it is basically I think that if we want to have I think in those kind of environments, like if you're in a situation where you have to participate in KYC and then that requires a degree of auditability, in which case the E cache privacy I think is still valuable on a peer to peer basis.  </p>
<p>00:38:07:29 - 00:38:38:16<br>Eric<br>But you know, the Federated, the federations going to know who you are based on, I'm assuming at least. So they would have to. But that may not be the ideal system, right? It's just like you probably are going to want some sort of system. And I don't think a blockchain would be the ideal system for that either. It's like you can have some sort of account based ledger that's, you know, and and you could put that into a chain structure of like embedded hashes.  </p>
<p>00:38:38:16 - 00:39:01:10<br>Eric<br>But I feel like just having general, you know, certain types of ledgers that are maintained in more of a centralized form and provided it's the idea of like, you know, private blockchains, but let's not make it a blockchain that requires consensus because it's just us here. Like what are we trying to achieve consensus over? I'm in charge and the CEO of the company or whatever it is I have final say.  </p>
<p>00:39:01:10 - 00:39:11:21<br>Eric<br>So let's not beat around the bush and let's just create something more efficient, I guess. Yeah, I don't know that that's kind of how I see it at this point.  </p>
<p>00:39:11:23 - 00:39:34:12<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Which is unfortunate because yeah, the possibilities which we should dive into too, because I mean, up to this point in the conversation, we're talking about e cash tokens, you put your Bitcoin into this Multisig address, you get a commensurate amount of e cash tokens in return they can use in a peer to peer fashion or send to other mints over the Lightning Network.  </p>
<p>00:39:34:15 - 00:40:15:09<br>Marty<br>But that's just the base case. Most fundamental use case is using these cash tokens as cash. But the way the Ferryman protocol has been built in a very modular fashion enables modules within that can provide what the incumbent banking system provides. But in this distributed system, using cryptographic primitives to provide app like services within the Mint. And so I've had Theo Majani on when he wrote the piece before you for Acxiom, talking about Bitcoin money market funds that could be constructed using DLCs and within 30 minutes you can construct Ios's.  </p>
<p>00:40:15:11 - 00:40:47:00<br>Marty<br>Stability pools are something that are a hot topic within the Fetterman community and they could essentially replace Stablecoins in terms of probably using something like a DLC contract for difference to create a stable value within a within a mint for people who don't want to take the price volatility risk of bitcoin want to lock in stable US dollar value when they launched version 0.2.1 last week, they announced that there's a prediction market module like how extensible is the settlement protocol.  </p>
<p>00:40:47:00 - 00:40:50:02<br>Marty<br>Like what kind of sci fi things can we build?  </p>
<p>00:40:50:04 - 00:41:20:19<br>Eric<br>Yeah, that's a good question. I definitely don't want to act like I'm any sort of authority on this. I assume you probably actually know more about it than I would, but I think that there's I think just like once again, back to the idea that like cash is kind of an ideal means of payment, and because it's built in a way that's very modular, there's I would assume that like most automated forms of smart contract things would be leveraging the system similar to this.  </p>
<p>00:41:20:21 - 00:41:43:15<br>Eric<br>And, and I think that because of that, like yeah, I think like the biggest thing I think stability pools is cool. My concern is that I could see like what I think about like the end users. It's like sharing like obviously for like Bitcoin specific users it's going to be a ton of people. Like I want that our local devs meet up out here in Denver.  </p>
<p>00:41:43:17 - 00:42:05:13<br>Eric<br>We would have a federation set up and we want to, you know, transact with cash between us. We already have our de-facto guardians within the group who control the multisig as it is right now. And, and that seems like something is really compelling, particularly if we could take a stability pool type position within that stack over time. That would be awesome.  </p>
<p>00:42:05:15 - 00:42:35:26<br>Eric<br>There's a lot of use cases that we would use for that. And, and I think that like the for like the broader mass market though, like I guess for like listeners in terms of background, you know, like tether is just making way too much money as stablecoins come into more competition, they're going to be enticing people that passing along the money that they're making on the reserve assets through the coin itself and providing an interest rate just like, you know, it's like a neobank merging within the same system.  </p>
<p>00:42:35:26 - 00:43:02:23<br>Eric<br>And I think the challenges that you're going to be competing against fiat economics with those rates to the average consumer, it's like, you know, API here versus API here. I want higher one, you know, hold this Stablecoin. I think that I wonder how competitive stability pools will be in the market because it's going to be more like paying a cost to have stability over time.  </p>
<p>00:43:02:25 - 00:43:33:11<br>Eric<br>And I think that like while, you know, while the exact same economic game is being played in the last crypto crisis, I think that, you know, the fiat type economics system is going to take a little bit longer to go away than, you know what, like Moshinsky and some of these other guys we're trying to do. So it's like, I think that that's kind of one of the I'm really curious to see how that aspect in the market develops over time.  </p>
<p>00:43:33:13 - 00:44:06:25<br>Eric<br>But I think that it's going to be a really valuable utility that exists within the system in terms of like other things that are emerging. I like, once again, going back to the idea of like it's just a technology and there's a lot of different ways that it can emerge. I think that I think that like it could be a system where, you know, like there's there's a lot of collateralized lending that starts to exist.  </p>
<p>00:44:06:25 - 00:44:43:24<br>Eric<br>I think that by bringing together people in this like banking or monetary type format, there is other forms of lending or on collateralized lending that could start to emerge within community functions. I think that like while there's quite a bit of needs, particularly within like the developing economy world, there's definitely a big capital problem. And, and perhaps these types of systems that aren't is regulated and are circumventing the traditional banking system could actually create like a funnel for new forms of capital to flow within these regions.  </p>
<p>00:44:43:26 - 00:44:49:18<br>Eric<br>And I think that that's like one of the particularly interesting use cases of elements.  </p>
<p>00:44:49:21 - 00:45:22:24<br>Marty<br>Yeah, not I can't keep, but harkening back to the fact that the regulatory environment is such where this sort of has to, you can't really go balls deep in this as like a builder here in the U.S. because it's yeah, the privacy really scares people. But I think over time, again, technology always wins out. I think this will be something that proliferates and wins massively.  </p>
<p>00:45:22:24 - 00:45:39:25<br>Marty<br>I'm and it's a bit contrarian in the Bitcoin space I mean a lot of people um that's another funny thing or like Friedman's been talked about for two years, there's nothing to show for it. It's probably not going to have much success. It's federated model, stupid. It's like, yeah, took a couple of years. Yes, it's been talked about for a couple of years.  </p>
<p>00:45:39:25 - 00:45:52:06<br>Marty<br>But like we mentioned, the first stable release came out last week or two weeks ago. Now at this point, that was last week. And we're only getting to the point where you can actually build cool things on this.  </p>
<p>00:45:52:08 - 00:45:54:00<br>Eric<br>Um, yep.  </p>
<p>00:45:54:02 - 00:46:23:06<br>Marty<br>And it's crazy because again, juxtaposing it to the incumbent banking system, you can create better experiences, more secure experiences by distributing risk not only within a man, but amongst multiple men. So, I mean, maybe we should jump down that rabbit hole is like, how do you view individual roles interacting with charming events? Will they have a go to mint or do you think they'll distribute that risk among many mints?  </p>
<p>00:46:23:06 - 00:46:28:09<br>Marty<br>Maybe two or three, maybe even a dozen that that provide specific services.  </p>
<p>00:46:28:11 - 00:46:55:01<br>Eric<br>Right? Yeah. Yeah. I think that like, there's going to be like highways and roads and streets that emerge. You're probably going to have like commercial scale type settlements in once again, if it's just one technology, right? Like wicked effective, it could also very easily create or create some sort of like auditability audit ability type module. You can build anything and have it be interactive with this protocol.  </p>
<p>00:46:55:08 - 00:47:21:17<br>Eric<br>So like I could see a, you know, quote unquote settlement or just banking infrastructure in general that is a part of the settlement protocol for one reason that is acting as like an exchange based type service. And I could see that being an institution, it's also probably a lightning service provider and is, you know, any other protocols that are relevant to interact within the network.  </p>
<p>00:47:21:19 - 00:47:46:19<br>Eric<br>They're probably going to be participating in in some form. It's like we're having this proliferation where I think the idea of like a bank, quote unquote, is really just like a service provider and and there's different protocols in which they're going to interact with, and there's different ways that they can extract, extract values like a business model. So like that go going back to I kind of like that money market type model of like the Bitcoin native money markets that are emerging.  </p>
<p>00:47:46:19 - 00:48:11:14<br>Eric<br>That's a really big idea. I think we need to get to like that very first catalyst in terms of means of payment before these really start to grow and expand and become material. But you know, lightning routing and liquidity leasing fees is a money market. And then lightning operators that are market making between lightning and E cash is also a market.  </p>
<p>00:48:11:16 - 00:48:36:01<br>Eric<br>And as you go further down the risk curve towards, you know, collateralized lending and then off chain lending, there's all these different money markets that are going to start to emerge in a digitally native fashion and and by being able to commit your capital directly into protocols that allow us to earn some type of interest or peer to peer marketplace, does that allow us to earn a type of interest?  </p>
<p>00:48:36:03 - 00:49:00:21<br>Eric<br>It's like we're creating these money markets relevant that are a part of a means of payment system that we haven't before. It's like by conducting, let's assume that within our current banking system we have like the cashier's check and within the cashier's check market, there's some level of fees that banks are consistently earning on an annual basis and the banks are all capturing it.  </p>
<p>00:49:00:24 - 00:49:18:21<br>Eric<br>Well, now it's like peer to peer participants are probably going to have access into those capital markets as well directly. And the banks won't be as much of an intermediary. It'll be more just like peer to peer capital markets. And like that's really cool because I think that that's going to create these virtuous cycles of growth within the capital markets over time.  </p>
<p>00:49:18:23 - 00:49:41:19<br>Eric<br>But going back to my point, like I feel like all those things stem on, like what's the first use case? And there's all these use cases that have kind of emerged and like crypto world that I don't perceive as sustainable use cases, or at least not in a material way. And, and I think the questions like what's the first one?  </p>
<p>00:49:41:19 - 00:50:06:29<br>Eric<br>And maybe that's maybe that's I leveraging lightning for agents and maybe that's global remittances leveraging the Lightning Network or maybe they're leveraging cash at some point too. I could see, I think when you get into the weeds of how that works, I think that cash could potentially be a viable way of achieving their goals, of moving collateral from one legal entity in one country to a legal entity in another country, and circumventing the banking system.  </p>
<p>00:50:07:01 - 00:50:33:14<br>Eric<br>And it wouldn't have an inbound liquidity constraint. And so whatever this is, whatever is all the fees that are extracted from operating in these new means of payment, those fees create the capital market over time. And then as we get capital markets, more investors come in, as more investors come in or people participate, more people become end users, so on and so forth.  </p>
<p>00:50:33:17 - 00:50:42:07<br>Eric<br>And I think that that's probably of the major killer apps that's going to come out of a lot of this. But still waiting on that catalyst.  </p>
<p>00:50:42:09 - 00:50:47:03<br>Marty<br>Yeah, is going to be the one the flex the domino could solve this stuff.  </p>
<p>00:50:47:03 - 00:50:53:12<br>Eric<br>Yeah I think we're getting close to man like think things are getting wild. I think this could be the year that we really what do you.  </p>
<p>00:50:53:12 - 00:50:56:17<br>Marty<br>Say that.  </p>
<p>00:50:56:20 - 00:51:25:04<br>Eric<br>I think we're I think we're building out I think from like I don't want to harp on like the whole like crossing the Chasm ETF thing. It's like there's plenty this funny enough around that. But I think like, this is what I'm looking at is like the Crossing the Chasm moment. It's just like I, I think that there is a bit of a critical mass and there are going to be enough tools within the next, I'll say, a year or two to where we could see a consumer level catalyst going back to like the two I'm making.  </p>
<p>00:51:25:04 - 00:51:58:11<br>Eric<br>Like if if we see like something like something like remittance markets, you know, some other form of adoption would really take off. And I feel like we are getting close to, oh, admittedly part of it's an intuition, but, you know, I definitely think that there's a lot being built in. There's a critical mass and in Bitcoin's because it's crossing this chasm of like legitimacy in the more regulated markets, that that is probably going to change the way that it's perceived and by the public.  </p>
<p>00:51:58:11 - 00:52:21:00<br>Eric<br>When we do start to have like a catalyst moment from one of these new like payment means or service use cases. And I think I think I think that there's like a pretty big moment coming from that. And I feel like that's when I think that's what things are going to get really, really wild. And it's not just going to be from like BlackRock buying our bags.  </p>
<p>00:52:21:02 - 00:52:55:15<br>Marty<br>Now. It's actually the contrarian take right now too, because everybody again is convinced that BlackRock entering all the ETFs, launching is the end of Self-sovereign Cypherpunk Bitcoin. But I think this is just the beginning when you consider the the protocols that are emerging. Obviously lightning's been around liquid's been around for three months finally launch and another proposal right now and I know Barack's working on it, but another sort of technology, another second layer solution that you discuss in the piece is ARC.  </p>
<p>00:52:55:15 - 00:53:33:08<br>Marty<br>And admittedly I've been only following an arm's length and haven't really delved into the details of the design of that particular layer and how it would work. So I think I don't think we've ever talked about ARC on TFT or Rabbit Hole Recap. Yeah, maybe in passing on Rabbit Hole recap, but I think it would be a good opportunity to dive into the arc of what it is conceptually and what sort of problems it would solve, because it does make different tradeoffs, obviously, and does do things better than lightning and filaments do in some ways.  </p>
<p>00:53:33:10 - 00:54:04:27<br>Eric<br>Yeah. So the first thing I'll give a disclaimer that I'm not the best person to be describing ARC, but again, I can talk about some things that like a high level and it's definitely unique in some ways and complex, and I really don't have any sort of certainty or firm opinion on it. But like we were it, it's interesting and I could see some there are some valuable things that I can talk about with that is what I'll say the like.  </p>
<p>00:54:05:00 - 00:54:48:09<br>Eric<br>I think that first. Yeah. So like part of the disclaimer, it's an emerging protocol. It requires a saw for it really to be usable in any legitimate way. And I think that when I decided to include it in the paper, I think it's just because it seems like while settlements like this, a trusted form of potential banking services are emerging, I think that arcs are like they do have potential to be like a trustless version or similar to a lightning trust minimized type version with, you know, unilateral withdrawal from the protocol existing as a property.  </p>
<p>00:54:48:11 - 00:55:37:01<br>Eric<br>And and I think that that's pretty cool. And you know, I didn't talk about rollups I'm still learning about rollups but I think that that's something else that requires the stuff works that would be, you know, potentially applying a similar quality. But basically what an arc is, is you're creating this agreement with an arch service provider, and that's a person or a group that has Bitcoin and you're creating an agreement with them where you say, okay, we are going to enter into this multisig with the time expiry on it and, and it might be just minimum, it might be me and 100 other people as well all getting into this multisig and you know, similar  </p>
<p>00:55:37:01 - 00:56:09:09<br>Eric<br>to like a channel factory is an onboarding mechanism and that's, that's kind of value proposition number one, but requires software. And it's not like anything distinct. There's without arc or no arc, there's ways that we can accomplish that same goal anyways, any protocol. But that's one part of the value proposition is that you can minimize on chain footprint and then when you enter into this, the our service provider provides a pre signed transaction to you so that you can exit out of protocol when you choose with that multisig agreement.  </p>
<p>00:56:09:11 - 00:56:53:20<br>Eric<br>But the goal would be to have you stay in the protocol. And if you remain within the protocol, it's basically they can conduct swap payments on your behalf so that you can pay people either at that are also compatible with the protocol. And they call these vortexes virtual transaction outputs where you're just trading pre signed transactions. Now because of the nature of the way it works, when a swap payment is done, the service provider has to the amount of capital required to conduct payments within an arc is effectively double the amount that is deposited within it.  </p>
<p>00:56:53:22 - 00:57:22:18<br>Eric<br>So that's where you run into a problem and that's where people are kind of like debating, you know, will this be viable? And those like the primary criticism of it, I think. But that basically means that this isn't the right number. But like in theory, it's like if ten and a half million Bitcoin were all to exist in our service providers, that would be the maximum that could happen because the service provider needs the other ten and a half million to be able to conduct swap transactions.  </p>
<p>00:57:22:20 - 00:57:59:10<br>Eric<br>And that's where I get into some of the problems is like while one of the goals of ARK was to remove this inbound liquidity constraint that lightning has, and that was kind of the cool part. But I think the problem is that the burden does get passed along to an ARK service provider. So it's kind of like almost and I guess, I don't know, this is completely right, but I think it's somewhat like centralizing the liquidity requirements in a way which is kind of already naturally happening within mining service providers, but by doing that, they could just basically conduct payments for you the way that you want with these virtual prison transactions.  </p>
<p>00:57:59:10 - 00:58:24:14<br>Eric<br>And anybody can take that and they can call that slip and they can unilaterally exit at any time. So like the one thing that I thought was kind of interesting is like the I think our service providers don't really make any sense when you think about them at a small scale, but as you scale them more, it actually kind of could make sense.  </p>
<p>00:58:24:17 - 00:58:46:19<br>Eric<br>And these are just like, I have these like swag estimates in there with a little like paper model that I built around what it could look like. But it's like if we kind of like, you know, assume certain transaction values of Bitcoin, then we can assume how what like the ultimate transaction throughput our service provider could eventually become.  </p>
<p>00:58:46:21 - 00:59:16:02<br>Eric<br>And I think when Bitcoin is valued less right, like if the average transaction size, let's say let's go to like one extreme right, it's like one bitcoin, then, you know, transactions per second is pretty much on par with bitcoins throughput of like six transactions per second. And then but as Bitcoin becomes more valuable, the average transaction within a system is less and less on a Satoshi basis.  </p>
<p>00:59:16:05 - 00:59:50:09<br>Eric<br>And I think that that's kind of an interesting idea because as Bitcoin grows and becomes more valuable and let's just assume that, you know, for sake of argument that the average transaction size, like globally across all payments is somewhere like 100 bucks or whatever it is, that as that is represented by less and less satoshis, the higher the transaction throughput of an our service provider becomes in terms of like its theoretical threshold of capital required.  </p>
<p>00:59:50:09 - 01:00:20:20<br>Eric<br>So like in today it's like, well, 10 billion bitcoin total value of payments settled isn't that much, but if you know, the Bitcoin as an asset is worth 100,000,000,000,001 day, now all of a sudden it starts to get pretty interesting. We're like, you know, 100 bits worth of average transaction size. You know, if that is like your average amount, then like, you know, 60,000 transactions per second is closer to where it could be.  </p>
<p>01:00:20:20 - 01:00:37:12<br>Eric<br>And that's on par with like a credit card company. And then if we get higher and higher, if we reach like parity or something like that, the numbers start to get a lot bigger. So I kind of just think it was like an interesting way of thinking about maybe it's like a long term, very, very long term type thing.  </p>
<p>01:00:37:15 - 01:00:48:13<br>Eric<br>But a lot of people were talking about it when I was writing this and I decided to dive into it and there's a lot of other things I didn't include in this paper that, you know, I would have if I had all the time in the world, But I'm getting to those.  </p>
<p>01:00:48:16 - 01:01:09:16<br>Marty<br>Yeah, admittedly, I've been a bit apprehensive to dive into Ark because it is. Yeah, Complex might be the right word, but it is. It's like a whole nother level of sort of system design that, yeah, I need to take the time to sit down and actually like read through and understand.  </p>
<p>01:01:09:19 - 01:01:18:09<br>Eric<br>This facility is this, this thing with the end for me. And I'm just like, oh, I need to, I need to punch that one out soon. But I guess it's so different.  </p>
<p>01:01:18:11 - 01:01:46:02<br>Marty<br>Yeah, No, I mean, in your final thoughts in the essay too, I thought you put it very presciently to like visualizing what this would look like. Like, uh, it's going to read from the final thoughts. Spoiler if you're planning on reading this and haven't yet. But imagine a system where users dollar cost averaging to Bitcoin via Aki's Federated Technology for custody in cash as a private cash balance for everyday transactions.  </p>
<p>01:01:46:02 - 01:02:10:15<br>Marty<br>And on the back end, all service providers are clearing balances between one another via the Lightning Network, Fundaments and ASPs could act as banking infrastructure, and the Lightning Network could act as a clearing house amongst them as a hub and spoke model further competition and information transparency are fostered by technologies like web of stakes, reputation management systems and expiring e cash reserve systems that is incredibly sci fi in the future.  </p>
<p>01:02:10:15 - 01:02:12:07<br>Marty<br>I want to see.  </p>
<p>01:02:12:10 - 01:02:40:21<br>Eric<br>So yeah, I guess I kind of missed the punch on that. I should have gone into that. It's like the sci fi detail, but like that's basically me just trying to draw. Like in free banking systems, you had banks, brokers, clearinghouses, net settlement between all these different groups, speculators who try to put banks out of business. I think that all that's emerging at a protocol level and I'm trying to like draw comparisons for like how these functions that have always existed are emerging in a new way, in a better way.  </p>
<p>01:02:40:24 - 01:02:41:26<br>Eric<br>Yeah.  </p>
<p>01:02:41:29 - 01:03:04:16<br>Marty<br>And so what do you think it's going to take? I mean, obviously we've talked about the catalyst and the emerging market is probably a place for this to start because they need something like this desperately. It's a step function improvement of what they're using and it will enable capital inflows that have not been possible today. But when you think about here in the West, do you think we get on board with this technology anytime soon?  </p>
<p>01:03:04:18 - 01:03:32:12<br>Eric<br>I feel like in the West I could see it actually. Like I mean, I guess it depends on your timeline, but I guess like we're thinking tomorrow, like, you know, like I was saying earlier, I think our local meet up wants to use something just like this. And it's like, I think if you have like comments or you have whatever you got, if people are conducting payments all the time, peer to peer, it's like if you have your own like federation set up and people are just effectively leveraging that and using these low cost cash payments, like, I think that's pretty cool.  </p>
<p>01:03:32:12 - 01:04:01:22<br>Eric<br>That's how I'll probably start using it. And yeah, I in terms of like other things, you know, I know that some people are thinking that there's like an institutional use case for like federal federated technology in general. And I think that that could make sense with like how you can leverage federated consensus to, to like optimize for how security is conducted within an organization, right like that.  </p>
<p>01:04:01:28 - 01:04:20:04<br>Eric<br>That's a great way of thinking about like what is shared custody. It's like, well, every organization is a form of shared custody. There's different permissions, it's different levels and there's different, you know, quote unquote, keys or passwords that people hold to be able to designs on behalf of a group. And and there is potential for this to be used.  </p>
<p>01:04:20:04 - 01:04:32:07<br>Eric<br>I guess going back to my point earlier, though, my hesitance was that is I don't know if e cache is necessarily the best medium for those types of use cases.  </p>
<p>01:04:32:10 - 01:04:51:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah. I mean, like just multi institution blend vanilla multisig makes a lot of sense for that, especially if the institutional level in your dealing with a lot of money rich transactions are probably worth it. If using a taproot multisig it's cheaper than wrap SegWit or something like that.  </p>
<p>01:04:51:15 - 01:04:53:24<br>Eric<br>So yeah.  </p>
<p>01:04:53:26 - 01:05:24:16<br>Marty<br>Yeah, it is crazy. I mean, that's another whole topic. Like before we even get to like the sci fi settlement, like just one simple low hanging fruit is making multi institution multi standard like, yeah, like with these ETFs all going to Coinbase that God forbid, I don't think it's going to happen. I think the history of Xapo and Coinbase, Coinbase acquired Zappo and Xapo obviously founded by Wences and Ted Rogers, did an incredible job of creating security protocols to ensure that they can protect your private keys.  </p>
<p>01:05:24:16 - 01:05:46:03<br>Marty<br>But God forbid Coinbase were to somehow get exploited their cold storage at least and you have what people are saying will be tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars over the next few years flow into these ETFs. They're leveraging Coinbase like that would be terrible. Like distribute that risk on multiple institutions, very low hanging fruit.  </p>
<p>01:05:46:06 - 01:06:11:01<br>Eric<br>Right? Right. Yeah. Which is kind of like an interesting idea of and I was I was thinking about this in terms of settlements. There could be an avenue as well where you separate minting from custody and that can create kind of a check and balance on the system. Interesting. But I don't know if that would be something that would ever naturally emerge.  </p>
<p>01:06:11:01 - 01:06:29:16<br>Eric<br>But I've kind of thought about if if there's a separation of custody from, you know, pretty much everything else in some format, then you might have parties with a interest that are, you know, fulfilling both of those functions. And that might be a good check on the system.  </p>
<p>01:06:29:19 - 01:06:32:03<br>Marty<br>How would that work?  </p>
<p>01:06:32:05 - 01:06:50:25<br>Eric<br>Well, I think that like e cash minting is technically arbitrary, right? So it's like you could just be a mint and you would have like, you know, say like a separate custodial provider who is the federation. And they're just like, we're the guys you have like your guardians hold the keys, We don't have your goatee. It's actually minting the cash.  </p>
<p>01:06:50:28 - 01:07:20:25<br>Eric<br>I don't know how like the current settlement architecture that could actually work. It's sort of like a theoretical idea and perhaps it actually is a simple thing. I never really talked to those guys about it, but I've kind of wondered if, like, you'd be like, okay, with this very minute we went to see Cash. Our custody is actually held by you, you know, some other group, whoever it is and is is long is like, you know, the same way that other custodial it could be like based on like trusted legal agreements between two organizations.  </p>
<p>01:07:20:25 - 01:07:34:14<br>Eric<br>Like at the end of the day, as long as somebody controls the funds, there's a risk of fraud, But it doesn't really have to be the mint and then, you know, profits and contracts oftentimes, I think, solve most issues.  </p>
<p>01:07:34:14 - 01:08:00:00<br>Marty<br>But yeah, interesting sort of an end user trying to think of how there's two ways I could see this going. And user takes Bitcoin goes to the federation. It's handling the custody, puts the Bitcoin in there, they take the bitcoin, give it to the mint, get e cash tokens in return. The mint has the bitcoin for doing that service or you can just have the user go straight to the mint and say, Hey, I want this many cash tokens in this mint.  </p>
<p>01:08:00:00 - 01:08:04:08<br>Marty<br>And they just mint them and send it to custody. That could be.  </p>
<p>01:08:04:08 - 01:08:20:16<br>Eric<br>Fascinating, right? Yeah, Yeah. I mean, it's so different than right, like major, you know, it's like the financial service providers in the industry today who use like you use like trying to trust or, you know, any of these other third party custodial providers give you something similar to that.  </p>
<p>01:08:20:18 - 01:08:27:23<br>Marty<br>Yeah, Fascinating. It's a brave new world. Eric Dix What do you think about all this ETF stuff?  </p>
<p>01:08:27:26 - 01:08:54:08<br>Eric<br>Noise No, I mean, look, I'm just I'm contrarian, right? Like, I think that the benefits need to necessarily be spoken to of the ETF. Like, you know, I think that there's obviously a ton of indirect benefits. I did a thread this summer when it was first popping up just basically trying to walk through the idea of like we, I, I, I don't know.  </p>
<p>01:08:54:09 - 01:09:17:20<br>Eric<br>My take is I'm not sure that there is I'm not sure like some people that are very excited about it. I'm not sure that it isn't something that could become this big scary problem within a few years I think depending on how rapidly capital starts flowing into these vehicles. Like, I think we could get to a material influential point in the market.  </p>
<p>01:09:17:20 - 01:09:47:08<br>Eric<br>And like at the end of the day, I think influencing Bitcoin is it's just the purely social consensus or not social, but it's a purely consensus based. And there's all these different layers of consensus. You know, there's investor developer, miner, social, there's all these things that exist. And as really big players enter, the community in a rapid way that also hold the keys to freedom in other aspects, right?  </p>
<p>01:09:47:09 - 01:10:11:27<br>Eric<br>Like BlackRock is a very influential company. It's one of the most influential companies in the world, having them become a major stakeholder within the ecosystem in a variety of different forms, I think is I think it's a scary proposition and I don't know where that could lead, but I think that something like, Oh, it's fine if it's goodbye, our bags and all that, I don't think it's that simple.  </p>
<p>01:10:11:27 - 01:10:45:13<br>Eric<br>I think there are legitimate concerns and like this goes back to the point around we like building out the self sovereign peer to peer system. It needs to happen. It's happening. But I think that like we really need to be prioritizing it more and more. I think that we're kind of getting to this inflection point in growth and I am concerned about what that could do to the undermining freedom, enabling properties of Bitcoin if Wall Street gets pretty influential.  </p>
<p>01:10:45:15 - 01:10:54:24<br>Marty<br>Agree? I completely agree there. That's why I'm happy we're talking about this today in the midst of all this ETF madness. This is where the signal is in my mind.  </p>
<p>01:10:54:27 - 01:11:17:27<br>Eric<br>Yeah. And it's like, yeah, I don't know. But I mean it's it's awesome man like it's, it's kind of it's pretty surreal. I remember when I first got into all this and like, it was cool to me that the Winklevoss twins were on CNBC talking this. I remember like, Oh shit, like, this is awesome for Bitcoin. They're on CNBC and now it's like we're we're in everything all the time.  </p>
<p>01:11:17:27 - 01:11:19:19<br>Eric<br>I mean, even you get.  </p>
<p>01:11:19:22 - 01:11:22:14<br>Marty<br>CNBC like a Bitcoin podcast network these days.  </p>
<p>01:11:22:14 - 01:11:24:23<br>Eric<br>Yeah, I know. It's crazy.  </p>
<p>01:11:24:25 - 01:11:37:07<br>Marty<br>It's, it's a no, it is funny, like thinking back to when I got in, like, I think my big like, oh shit, we made it mom. It was like Coinbase on their debit card and if you like, use.  </p>
<p>01:11:37:09 - 01:11:37:21<br>Eric<br>Bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:11:37:21 - 01:11:49:25<br>Marty<br>Back debit card to buy stuff. I was like, Oh, we made It's here. That's the thing. I've been I've been around Bitcoin for ten years now. That's one thing I've come to like it's and it's a long journey.  </p>
<p>01:11:49:27 - 01:11:52:04<br>Eric<br>Damn, ten years. That's sweet, man.  </p>
<p>01:11:52:07 - 01:12:05:27<br>Marty<br>We've come a long way. We're, uh, 15 years. And now it's going to happen. It's going to take longer than you originally expect, but it's going to happen much quicker than most people expect as well.  </p>
<p>01:12:06:00 - 01:12:30:04<br>Eric<br>Yeah, exactly. I think that's everything since I got into this industry, I feel like everything I've expected has happened drastically more quickly and I feel like all we are is a press release away from some sort of crazy news thing happening. And yeah, it's also funny too, because, you know, I, I jumped into all this basically. I started writing my book in 2020.  </p>
<p>01:12:30:07 - 01:12:53:22<br>Eric<br>I really started like talking to a lot of people in the industry in like 2021. A lot of kind of like a last cycle guy, and I'm just like a noob, but like, it's kind of funny because I'm starting to like make my first news cycle with a bunch of people coming and I'm like starting to see all the parallels and everything and like, you know, I was following things from a distance back in 2017.  </p>
<p>01:12:53:24 - 01:12:57:28<br>Eric<br>So this is like it's very different being involved in, the industry and having that perspective.  </p>
<p>01:12:58:00 - 01:13:00:03<br>Marty<br>What were you doing before?  </p>
<p>01:13:00:05 - 01:13:28:21<br>Eric<br>So I was working for a private equity fund and so I was so before that I was at FTI Consulting and I actually was a few years before Parker was there using the exact same group I was in Boston I worked for at my private equity fund was in Parker's class at our last company, their friends. But it was funny when I got into this and then I was talking to one guy at our group, he's like, Oh, like you should talk to Parker Lewis.  </p>
<p>01:13:28:24 - 01:13:50:10<br>Eric<br>And so funny. Yeah, Parker directed me to the Bitcoin standard and everything because like back then I was definitely a lot more like, I wasn't like I definitely saw the value in Bitcoin, but I was like way more open minded to the rest of crypto. And it was. Parker kind of pushing me Bitcoin standard direction that really helped me like be like, Oh, I see.  </p>
<p>01:13:50:10 - 01:13:53:24<br>Eric<br>Okay, it's not, it's not all the narratives being told.  </p>
<p>01:13:53:26 - 01:14:11:08<br>Marty<br>No money will converge to one. He just gave that presentation today at the Commons. Yeah. And that's fascinating how quickly in these cycles come in it's I've got pattern recognition. I think there's a third or fourth cycle now. It's like, holy shit, it's all happening.  </p>
<p>01:14:11:11 - 01:14:12:25<br>Eric<br>Yeah, that's wild, man.  </p>
<p>01:14:12:28 - 01:14:36:18<br>Marty<br>Another thing about the ETF and like the whole I agree with your your long term worries about the influence of BlackRock and others can have on Bitcoin's consensus layer the social consensus specifically and try to use their ability to throw around capital to try to force Bitcoin to do things. But I do also think this week was an incredible advertisement for bitcoin.  </p>
<p>01:14:36:18 - 01:15:04:26<br>Marty<br>Like you had the SCC, so you had the SEC fumbled the announcement like three times and then like apparently behind the scenes, I'm not sure if you're hearing this, but it's complete chaos behind the scenes. In terms of the APIs, obviously you have Vanguard not allowing people to buy the the SEC fuck up as a complete, uh, validation of the fact that the government's completely incompetent and you shouldn't be trusting them.  </p>
<p>01:15:04:26 - 01:15:22:17<br>Marty<br>And who are they to regulate all this stuff and tell us what to do and what money we can use and what financial products we can get access to. And then the launch today and the the stark reminder of trusted third party risk. People like Vanguard saying like, no, you can't buy these ETFs. It's not in. Yeah, yeah.  </p>
<p>01:15:22:19 - 01:15:24:20<br>Marty<br>It's like, oh, that's poetic.  </p>
<p>01:15:24:22 - 01:15:45:06<br>Eric<br>It's poetic and it is cool. I was like, I was hanging out with a friend and I was just like, I, I can't believe it always is like this too. It's like this is just it's like the movie is unfolding and I like, tweeted. I was like, Gensler, it looks like such a joke. Now. They're definitely going to have like, some absurd character play him in the movie.  </p>
<p>01:15:45:06 - 01:15:56:15<br>Eric<br>It's going to be like Will Ferrell or something. He's just going to act like a crazy asshole or something and like, Yeah, it's wild, man. I couldn't believe it. What I thought was so bad ass was Esther Pierce's statement. Yeah, that led complete.  </p>
<p>01:15:56:15 - 01:15:59:10<br>Marty<br>Counter signal immediately after his letter.  </p>
<p>01:15:59:13 - 01:16:19:23<br>Eric<br>Yeah, that. That was really cool. And just like we have this divided house for the securities regulator of the largest capital markets in the world, and that it's such a canary in the coal mine for the reality of what's happening within fiat world. Think a lot of people are actually starting to see and it's becoming mainstream.  </p>
<p>01:16:19:25 - 01:16:50:28<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I mean, you have that rolling into an election cycle and one of the like I've been making, I have been thinking about Rome a lot lately. My wife asked me any day over the last month, Yes, I've been thinking about Romani, but the one thing like whether it's like the house divided at the FCC or this other signal, obviously inflation's high, but the one that really stuck in my mind for the last month is this all trend of active duty military members like going on tick tock.  </p>
<p>01:16:50:28 - 01:17:07:26<br>Marty<br>There was like a tick tock trend of these military members basically on duty somewhere in the world, like telling others like don't join the army, the money's not worth it. And that's like the one thing that led to the sacking of Rome was like when they couldn't pay their overextended military, they'd pay them. It wasn't bunkum at all.  </p>
<p>01:17:07:26 - 01:17:24:21<br>Marty<br>But today, fast forward thousands of years and we're having the same problem here in America. And again, it's a canary in, the coal mine that not many people have picked up on. When your military servicemen and women are actively telling others not to join because the pay isn't worth it, like the not worth it.  </p>
<p>01:17:24:21 - 01:17:28:09<br>Eric<br>That's that's wild. I hadn't heard about that. That's interesting.  </p>
<p>01:17:28:11 - 01:17:31:14<br>Marty<br>Yeah. It's a lot of canaries out there.  </p>
<p>01:17:31:16 - 01:18:04:06<br>Eric<br>Well, makes sense, too. I mean, like, I'm not an expert. Well, I guess, like, all my family is military, but like, in terms of, like, the way that it works today, I'm not as familiar with, like, I thought that there's some sort of with all of the like, school the education promise from is, you know, military compensation that they basically have all these restrictions on it so that you can pretty much only do these like bullshit online universities that don't really get you anywhere or I don't know if that's actually the case, but I was getting that impression.  </p>
<p>01:18:04:08 - 01:18:35:08<br>Marty<br>Yeah. Yeah. Um, it's, it's and then like, you look at the stat I ran last week doing a like retrospective on the first 15 years, focused on the financial system, like to see the ratio of national debt to M to 29 when Bitcoin launch was 1.26 we were at 8.7 trillion and M two and 10.7 in national debt today forward to January 2024.  </p>
<p>01:18:35:08 - 01:18:48:04<br>Marty<br>That ratio is 1.68. We're at 21 trillion in M2 and 34 trillion in debt. And so just thinking of something, that ratio needs to revert to the mean back towards 1.26.  </p>
<p>01:18:48:04 - 01:18:49:02<br>Eric<br>The.  </p>
<p>01:18:49:05 - 01:19:01:04<br>Marty<br>Monetary base is going to expand. It's inflation problem is not going away. No matter how much the Biden administration would like you to believe that this.  </p>
<p>01:19:01:07 - 01:19:07:07<br>Eric<br>Yeah, it's going to be it's going to be wild, man. But I'm ready, man. It's going to be a good year.  </p>
<p>01:19:07:09 - 01:19:17:05<br>Marty<br>Excited and is going to be a good year. Eric Long time coming. I'm happy we waited, though, because I think this is a fascinating topic. We'll have to do it more. You have to come it in person. Well, to figure it out.  </p>
<p>01:19:17:07 - 01:19:21:21<br>Eric<br>Man, I do plan on getting that to us. And at some point, like I think first half of this year.  </p>
<p>01:19:21:21 - 01:19:38:22<br>Marty<br>So definitely come through the comments. It's a good vibe here, great vibes today where, I mean, we're going to link to this piece in the show notes will link to your book as well. What else do you want the first to know before we wrap up here, any final thoughts? Anywhere you want to send people.  </p>
<p>01:19:38:23 - 01:19:52:25<br>Eric<br>Just Twitter for me. Yeah, I mean, that's kind of where I run my life out of the DM's on Twitter for the most part. So yeah it is it me up there, it's just my name and yeah and so.  </p>
<p>01:19:52:27 - 01:19:59:16<br>Marty<br>We'll link to that as well. Eric Keep crushing it. We're going to win. Crazy time to be alive.  </p>
<p>01:19:59:19 - 01:20:01:19<br>Eric<br>I tell you. Thanks, man.  </p>
<p>01:20:01:22 - 01:20:03:00<br>Marty<br>Peace and love for you.</p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:image href="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/473-Eric-Yakes.png"/>
      </item>
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Amos Miller And The Encroachment Of The Nanny State with Chris Hume]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[This episode dives into the pressing issue of food security with Chris Hume from the Lancaster Patriot. The conversation revolves around the recent raid on Amos Miller's organic farm by Pennsylvania state troopers and the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture.]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode dives into the pressing issue of food security with Chris Hume from the Lancaster Patriot. The conversation revolves around the recent raid on Amos Miller's organic farm by Pennsylvania state troopers and the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture.]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2024 17:28:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-ioamos-miller-persecution/</link>
      <comments>https://scrib-brugeman.npub.pro/post/https-tftc-ioamos-miller-persecution/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qq5xsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7ctddaej6mtfd3kx2u3dwpjhyum9vd6hg6t0dchsygpgy34wakm8efaj2qwtvkqdcqktz2cze2kw68mjnwmpjhgx9vgg45psgqqqw4rsl5axhj</guid>
      <category>TFTC Podcast</category>
      
        <media:content url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/472-Chris-Hume.png" medium="image"/>
        <enclosure 
          url="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/472-Chris-Hume.png" length="0" 
          type="image/png" 
        />
      <noteId>naddr1qq5xsar5wpen5te0w3n8gcewd9hj7ctddaej6mtfd3kx2u3dwpjhyum9vd6hg6t0dchsygpgy34wakm8efaj2qwtvkqdcqktz2cze2kw68mjnwmpjhgx9vgg45psgqqqw4rsl5axhj</noteId>
      <npub>npub19qjx4mkmvl98kfgpedjcphqzevftqt92emglw2dmvx2aqc43pzksn4zc3g</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrib]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/amos-miller-persecution/">Read original post</a></p>
<h3><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h3>
<p>This episode dives into the pressing issue of food security with Chris Hume from the Lancaster Patriot. The conversation revolves around the recent raid on Amos Miller's organic farm by Pennsylvania state troopers and the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Miller has been selling meat directly to his community, which led to the raid based on a search warrant citing incidents dating back to 2016, where individuals allegedly became sick after consuming his products. The warrant also highlighted that Miller had not complied with state licensing and registration requirements.</p>
<p>The discussion highlights the broader implications of the state's intervention in the food industry, particularly affecting small-scale and organic farmers like Miller, who is Amish. The Amish community has historically been successful in maintaining a degree of separation from the heavily regulated food industry. However, the recent raid suggests a concerning trend of the state attempting to force compliance with regulations that favor large, centralized food producers.</p>
<p>Chris Hume emphasizes the need for food freedom and the right to choose what we consume as a fundamental aspect of liberty. He also discusses the role of the state in enforcing regulations, often at the expense of small businesses and individual rights. The conversation touches upon the importance of opposing unjust laws and the potential for civil disobedience to protect freedoms.</p>
<p>[</p>
<p>State Agents Execute Search Warrant at Amos Miller’s Organic Farm in Lancaster County</p>
<p>The details surrounding the search warrant and the reasons for this government intervention at Miller’s farm remain unclear. However, such actions are not unprecedented; Miller has previously faced scrutiny for selling organic meat without adhering to certain regulatory procedures.</p>
<p><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/size/w256h256/2023/12/TFTC_02_Black-2--1-.png" alt="">TFTC – Truth for the CommonerStaff</p>
<p><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/size/w1200/2024/01/humble_farmer_state_troopers_midjourney.png" alt=""></p>
<p>](<np-embed url="https://tftc.io/amos-miller-raid/"><a href="https://tftc.io/amos-miller-raid/">https://tftc.io/amos-miller-raid/</a></np-embed>)</p>
<h3><strong>Best Quotes</strong></h3>
<ol>
<li>"If we don't have the freedom to choose what we eat, what freedom do we have?" – Chris Hume</li>
<li>"The government doesn't care about our health and safety. What they want is control and they want compliant subjects." – Chris Hume</li>
<li>"If we continue to roll over here and let the government tell us what we can and can't eat. We're not going to have a society left to even offer these products." – Chris Hume</li>
<li>"Woe to those who decree iniquitous decrees and the writers who keep writing oppression." – Chris Hume, quoting the prophet Isaiah</li>
<li>"If the law is unjust, it is your duty to disobey." – Marty, paraphrasing Thomas Jefferson</li>
</ol>
<h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3>
<p>The conversation between Marty and Chris Hume serves as a clarion call for the preservation of food freedom and the right to self-determination in the face of increasing state intervention. The raid on Amos Miller's farm is not just an isolated incident but a symbol of the broader struggle between small-scale, traditional food producers and the regulatory state that favors industrialized agriculture.</p>
<p>The key takeaway from this discussion is the importance of standing up for individual liberties and supporting those who resist unjust laws. As the conversation suggests, the fight for food freedom is deeply intertwined with the principles of justice, self-governance, and opposition to tyranny. It is a reminder that complacency in the face of government overreach can lead to the erosion of fundamental freedoms, not just in the realm of food production but across all aspects of life.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the conversation underscores the need for a collective awakening to the dangers of statism and the importance of reclaiming the rights endowed by our Creator, rather than those dictated by the state. It is a call to action for individuals to take responsibility for their choices and to support those who courageously defend our inalienable rights.</p>
<h3>Links</h3>
<p>Follow Chris on <a href="https://twitter.com/chrishume1689?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>Follow The Lancaster Patriot on <a href="https://twitter.com/TheLanPatriot?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>Check out The Lancaster Patriot <a href="https://www.thelancasterpatriot.com/?ref=tftc.io">website</a></p>
<h3>Sponsors</h3>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<h3><strong>Timestamps</strong></h3>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>6:17 - Amos Miller raided<br>10:42 - State dislikes independent communities<br>14:28 - The problem of positive law<br>19:01 - The state removes your choices<br>24:59 - “Raw” milk and choosing for yourself<br>29:00 - Forgoing convenience<br>32:01 - Those who enable tyranny<br>40:02 - Money printing gives the state leverage<br>48:47 - Statism vs Christianity<br>1:00:52 - Pushing back<br>1:04:45 - Wrapping up</p>
<h3>Transcript</h3>
<p>00:00:03:10 - 00:00:31:24<br>Marty<br>Welcome back to TFT. I'm sitting down with Chris HUME from the Lancaster Patriot to talk about a topic that we've covered loosely over the last few years, which is food security. Last week, Amos Miller had Pennsylvania State troopers come and raid his farm because of the fact that he was selling meat directly to his community. Chris, you were on site covering the situation.  </p>
<p>00:00:31:24 - 00:00:37:00<br>Marty<br>What went on that day, I believe, was Wednesday or Thursday of last week.  </p>
<p>00:00:37:02 - 00:00:57:04<br>Chris<br>Yeah, thanks for having me on, Marty. Yeah, it was Thursday morning. I received a phone call from someone letting me know that Amos was being raided yet again. This is not the first time this has happened to Amos. I got the phone call. State troopers are there. So when I got there, I don't know how long the state troopers had already been on site.  </p>
<p>00:00:57:04 - 00:01:19:20<br>Chris<br>And there were as well as state troopers. There were employees of the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. And so the state troopers are really just providing security, quote unquote. So these employees of the state Department of Agriculture obtained a search warrant to enter Amos Miller's farm and search his products. So they were inside the building there. They would not let me in.  </p>
<p>00:01:19:20 - 00:01:36:18<br>Chris<br>They turned me away. From what I understand, they wouldn't even allow Amos Miller, the owner of the farm, inside his own buildings while they were conducting the search warrant. So we don't know exactly what they did in there. I mean, and sometimes it can be difficult to get police body cam footage. So it's hard to say. You know what?  </p>
<p>00:01:36:18 - 00:01:56:28<br>Chris<br>They tracked in with them. They took out some of Amos products, but they were in there ostensibly testing his products and confiscating seizing some of his property and then leaving a detainment order saying that I don't believe it's all of his products, but a lot of his products cannot be used. They're sold or it can't even be disposed of.  </p>
<p>00:01:57:00 - 00:02:09:18<br>Chris<br>But that was the initial the initial scene, about five vehicles there, two state trooper vehicles, three state trooper individuals there. And preventing entrance into the into the farm store.  </p>
<p>00:02:09:20 - 00:02:12:27<br>Marty<br>What was the justification of the search warrant?  </p>
<p>00:02:12:29 - 00:02:41:16<br>Chris<br>So the search warrant there was an interesting search warrant. This was from an employee, I believe is Sherry Morris within the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. The search warrant cited incidents going all the way back to 2016, which is interesting. So basically, Amos Miller, just for your listeners, that might not be aware, Amos Miller has been conducting his organic farm operations here in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, I'd say for at least two decades.  </p>
<p>00:02:41:16 - 00:03:06:03<br>Chris<br>I think he took over from his father and he's continued to improve his operations, and he has customers all over the nation. And the search warrant cited some different incidences dating back to 2016 where apparently someone I believe it was in California, someone allegedly got sick and they allegedly consumed some of Amos products. All of this is very vague.  </p>
<p>00:03:06:05 - 00:03:35:09<br>Chris<br>There's really not a direct link to Amos Miller, I think, in many of this stuff. But so they listed several incidents saying, well, someone got sick and they had Amos products. And so the search warrant kind of listed different years, different incidents. And then the latest thing was in December of 2023. So just this past month, apparently an individual in New York and another individual in Michigan, I believe, got sick, went to the hospital.  </p>
<p>00:03:35:12 - 00:04:04:04<br>Chris<br>And allegedly, those people were they had E coli. They got sick for me coli. And once again, they had consumed or potentially consumed or purchased products from Amos Miller Store. All of this is kind of vague, but in the end, the real justification on the search warrant, all of those things as far as, oh, someone may have potentially gotten sick, all of that was directed towards I think it's the last paragraph of the search warrant for Amos Miller is not licensed.  </p>
<p>00:04:04:06 - 00:04:24:25<br>Chris<br>He's not registered. He has not jumped through the bureaucratic hoops that the state has sworn him to. And so that's really what this is about at the end. I think the claims of sickness are just a pretense to shut down Amos Miller, because at the end of the day, the search warrant says, you know, he is not licensed, he's not registered, he didn't follow our mandates.  </p>
<p>00:04:25:02 - 00:04:28:05<br>Chris<br>And that's why I want to be allowed in there.  </p>
<p>00:04:28:07 - 00:04:44:15<br>Marty<br>In this particular case, between the state of Pennsylvania and Amos and previously the federal government in Amos is very interesting because Amos, if I'm correct, is Amish, correct. He's part of the Amish community, Lancaster County.  </p>
<p>00:04:44:16 - 00:04:45:04<br>Chris<br>Right.  </p>
<p>00:04:45:07 - 00:05:14:18<br>Marty<br>Now. Growing up in Philadelphia, we had Redding Terminal in Philadelphia, and that was one of the best sections of writing Terminal was the Amish section. They would come in from Lancaster, sell their baked goods, their meat, and everybody loved it. And the Amish have done a particularly good job sort of bifurcating and inoculating themselves from the rest of society, the modernized, industrialized, digitized society here in the United States.  </p>
<p>00:05:14:18 - 00:05:38:01<br>Marty<br>And they've done a very good job of running successful businesses and living in their own community, particularly in Lancaster County and other parts of the country, obviously parts of Appalachia as well. And I think this is a big point in the history of the Amish in the United States. They've sort of had their ability to run their operations.  </p>
<p>00:05:38:01 - 00:05:58:00<br>Marty<br>They do it very well. People love it again. People in Philadelphia love the the Amish section of running terminal. And the state seems to want a cattle herd, everybody towards these hyper regulated parts of the food industry, which is dominated by very few players in the Amish for a long time. So we're not going to play that game.  </p>
<p>00:05:58:03 - 00:06:08:10<br>Marty<br>We make good food, we do it in a good way. We rejoin the farm, we take care of our animals, we take care of our customers. And it seems like the state does not like that.  </p>
<p>00:06:08:12 - 00:06:29:12<br>Chris<br>Right. And I think this is, you know, maybe something of a boiling point. I'm not sure. In one sense. I hope it does galvanize not just the Amish, but Americans in general to stand up for food freedom. You know, if we don't have the freedom to choose what we eat, what freedom do we have? But I think there's a challenge here and there's a lot of directions we could go with this, Marty.  </p>
<p>00:06:29:12 - 00:06:51:13<br>Chris<br>But but the Amish, you know, in the 1960s, I believe they really took a stand against government education. And they said, we do not want to send our children to the state to be educated. And that was a big deal because generally speaking, the Amish, you know, a Baptist background, they don't really want to stir things up. They want to be left to themselves, but they did take a stand with government education.  </p>
<p>00:06:51:13 - 00:07:14:10<br>Chris<br>And I believe some people even went to jail over that. Some Amish men even went to jail because of their defiance of the government. In that case, which again, is is somewhat out of character for the typical Amish mindset. And I think what Amos Miller is up against here is not only up against the statists in the federal government and in this case, the state government.  </p>
<p>00:07:14:12 - 00:07:37:04<br>Chris<br>He's also up against a general mindset. First of all, I'd say in the American mind that we need the government to regulate these things to keep us safe. That's a big problem in America. But he's also, I think, up against somewhat within the Amish community itself. Will the Amish community as a whole get behind Amos or will they say, you know what, we just got to follow these regulations?  </p>
<p>00:07:37:06 - 00:07:58:05<br>Chris<br>And as it stands now, my understanding here being here in Lancaster County, I think there's some hesitancy for the community as a whole, the Amish community, to really get behind what Amos is doing. And I hope that this situation and I hope we don't have to have more like this, will galvanize them to say, you know what, we need to make a stand like we did in the sixties over government education.  </p>
<p>00:07:58:07 - 00:08:15:08<br>Chris<br>If if we continue to roll over here and let the government tell us what we can and can't eat, you know, we're not going to have a society left to even offer these products. You know, the Amish way of life will end, and not to mention freedom for many other people.  </p>
<p>00:08:15:10 - 00:08:49:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I recall seeing you interview a pastor, I believe it was Friday or Thursday afternoon. And when we get back to first principles and essentially what Amazon and other Amish farmers are doing, they're essentially trying to provide a good service to their community, raise animals, raise crops, deliver that high quality food to consumers, consumers making an educated decision, hey, I think this guy is doing a good job running his farm.  </p>
<p>00:08:49:15 - 00:09:11:07<br>Marty<br>I think his food tastes good. I think it's healthy. I want to purchase that food from him. If a peer to peer interaction there, the state feels compelled to interject themselves into at any given point in time. And I thought that interview you had with the priest was pretty illuminating because you get back to like biblical sort of the biblical stance on this.  </p>
<p>00:09:11:10 - 00:09:29:27<br>Marty<br>Like if there's no harm done, there shouldn't be any crime and there shouldn't be any persecute action on behalf of or towards the person providing the service. Could you elaborate on what what the pastor said during that brief interview with him?  </p>
<p>00:09:30:00 - 00:09:54:09<br>Chris<br>Yeah, that was Pastor Joel saying he's a pastor here in Lancaster County of Independence, Reformed Bible Church, RBC Dot Church. If you want more information on Pastor Joel. And one of the things I really appreciate about Pastor Joel is that from the pulpit and also just throughout the week, he is engaging in the public with with the law, word of God, and explaining how the Bible applies to all of life.  </p>
<p>00:09:54:11 - 00:10:25:12<br>Chris<br>And that's one of the things in it's very sad in America where we've where we're at right now, where we are, we we have such a a tradition, a history of Christian thought and Bible based ethics, and we've abandoned that. And one of the important things that Pastor Joel brought up in that interaction was this idea of administrative law and the government, you know, interjecting itself in in interactions between people.  </p>
<p>00:10:25:12 - 00:10:49:21<br>Chris<br>So if you if you look at the Bible to look at biblical law, it's it's ensuring that justice is done between a man and his neighbor. So those those are the two parties in the in the interaction, if you will. It's me and my neighbor. It's me and someone else. And if I wrong someone, then that person can can go to the magistrate and say, hey, I've been wronged by this person, here's my case.  </p>
<p>00:10:49:24 - 00:11:11:27<br>Chris<br>And that's that's you know, there's much more we can get into there, Marty. But in a nutshell, that's the biblical idea of justice. Now, there's some more things we could cover, but the point is, the state coming in, we've created a status system in America where the civil government now is proactively trying to, quote unquote, protect and manage our affairs.  </p>
<p>00:11:12:00 - 00:11:33:24<br>Chris<br>And R.J. Rushdoony years ago said once, once the law becomes positive in the sense that that the government can make laws that say, hey, we're going to make all these laws in order to protect the health of the people. Once that becomes the M.O. of a society, tyranny is inevitable because the government will now say it is in our interests to protect you.  </p>
<p>00:11:33:25 - 00:11:51:16<br>Chris<br>So now every law we make, we have authority to do this because it's in your best interest. Biblical law says, look, if someone has wronged you, now, you go to the magistrate. And of course, in Amos's case, you know, and people can have complaints about a business and we could talk about that as well, you know, willing seller, willing buyer.  </p>
<p>00:11:51:23 - 00:12:18:20<br>Chris<br>But I don't have a problem with people saying, Hey, I got a complaint about this product or that product. But as far as saying that he has he's done evil, That's we don't see that in this case. Nothing Amos has done violates the law of God. Nothing Amos has done is immoral. Amos has simply run afoul of a statist government, saying, You have to follow our regulations if you want to serve your neighbor.  </p>
<p>00:12:18:22 - 00:12:42:21<br>Chris<br>And this is really the bane of manmade law in America. We elect these officials. And I think one of the worst things we do, whether we vote Democrat or Republican, is we assume and we continue this idea that they can just make law and they have the authority to tell us, you know, if we made a law. So therefore, now you have to follow this regulation.  </p>
<p>00:12:42:23 - 00:12:48:11<br>Chris<br>And that's that's an affront, a violation of biblical law.  </p>
<p>00:12:48:13 - 00:13:16:25<br>Marty<br>And not only is an affront to biblical law, but the state's interjection between these peer to peer transactions with willing participants is completely counterproductive, because you look at the state, particularly the agricultural industry in the United States, it's hyper centralized. The end product is frankly unhealthy for people. We have diabetes rates at all time highs with childhood diabetes rates at all time highs.  </p>
<p>00:13:16:27 - 00:13:47:21<br>Marty<br>Life expectancy is falling here in the United States. Heart disease is leading killer, one of the top three leading killers. Now it's Vietnam, I believe, but heart disease is still up there in the States. Interjection in this market has not produced a positive outcome for all of society, yet they keep doubling, tripling, quadrupling, down to the point where, again, they're attacking an Amish community that is sort of had this unwritten agreement with the rest of society in the United States, like, Hey, leave us alone, we're going to do our thing.  </p>
<p>00:13:47:21 - 00:14:10:18<br>Marty<br>And that's been going pretty well and good for many decades now. And now they seem to be grasping for more here. And again, the outcome has been completely counterproductive and a net negative for society overall. We need more decentralized, distributed regenerative farmers in the world, particularly in the U.S. And the government is directly attacking that right now.  </p>
<p>00:14:10:20 - 00:14:30:22<br>Chris<br>Right. Yeah. And there's a passage in the Bible. It says the fallow ground of the poor would yield much food, but it is swept away through injustice. So you have this idea of and, you know, somebody might say, well, Amos Miller, he's not a really tiny, tiny farmer, but in the grand scheme of things, he's a small farmer compared to the huge industrial commercial producers.  </p>
<p>00:14:30:25 - 00:14:51:17<br>Chris<br>I would say he's probably one of the the bigger of the small farmers. So he's the target of the government because if they can shut him down now, then they can go next. I mean, and if you think, you know, you got to even smaller operation than Amos Miller's and you think you're safe, you're not. Unless the people oppose this and resist this tyranny.  </p>
<p>00:14:51:19 - 00:15:16:27<br>Chris<br>And you're right, it's completely counterproductive. And that's why the scripture over and over again talks about how when, when when tyrants oppress the poor and they exact taxes on the grain, it hurts. It hurts everybody. And, you know, it's just very interesting to hear, you know, overwhelmingly I'm hearing a ton of support for Amos. But there are people that are still out there saying, you know, you just got to it's got to follow the government regulations here.  </p>
<p>00:15:17:00 - 00:15:50:24<br>Chris<br>And that's another problem that people think the government actually cares about. Our safety actually cares about our health when we have, you know, not not to mention the vaccine that was pushed by by government bureaucrats, not to mention that millions of babies are murdered via abortion, you know, with the approving nod of government officials, all the commercial products with all the the additives and the chemicals they have no problem with any of that stuff, because at the end of the day, you know, those companies are lobbying them, they're paying their corporate taxes, they're benefiting.  </p>
<p>00:15:50:27 - 00:16:14:20<br>Chris<br>The government doesn't care about our health and our safety. What they want is control and they want compliant subjects. And Amos Miller represents the antithesis of that. He represents the antithesis of the nanny state. The nanny state wants us to basically have no other option but to buy the slop that the government mandates. It's the same as education, actually, my pastor Joel was talking about this.  </p>
<p>00:16:14:22 - 00:16:36:09<br>Chris<br>It's the same thing with education. The government wants you to have no other option than to send your kids to the government schools. They want that to be the only choice you have and your children to consume that ideological slop in the government classrooms. It's the same thing they want with the food. They want you to have no choice but to go to a government, approved a food producer and eat that slop.  </p>
<p>00:16:36:10 - 00:16:54:03<br>Chris<br>And many Americans, thankfully, are still are not willing to give that up. But I'm concerned, Marty, that many Americans are and that I'm just not sure where we're at as a nation and where this is going to go. And if we can't if we don't have the freedom to eat and choose what we eat, we really don't have freedom less.  </p>
<p>00:16:54:03 - 00:16:58:23<br>Chris<br>This is not in many ways, this is no longer the land of the free.  </p>
<p>00:16:58:25 - 00:17:20:04<br>Marty<br>I mean, choosing what you eat. I mean, energy is the basis of life, and food provides that energy to humans to allow us to go toil and work throughout the economy. And if we're not allowed to choose the energy that we're putting into our bodies, what autonomy do we have, if anything? Like everything you just mentioned there, like the government is a well-oiled machine.  </p>
<p>00:17:20:04 - 00:17:44:14<br>Marty<br>You get the education, the food industry and the farm industry, particularly in this triangle, I would say, that are tightly knitted. You have the education and the education system feeding you the food pyramid, which is actively just complete B.S. It's here learning you got to eat ten servings of grain a day. Don't eat meat, don't eat butter. You know, all these saturated fats.  </p>
<p>00:17:44:16 - 00:18:02:07<br>Marty<br>You're learning that in school and then you're going to the shopping center and you've got all this industrial sludge, the soy slop, if you will. And then on the back end, when that waste slop gets you nice and sick and off you go to the health care system with big pharma behind it to feed you all these pills that never really make you better.  </p>
<p>00:18:02:07 - 00:18:29:09<br>Marty<br>They just maintain and keep you a client in all of this, as you alluded to, is filled by the donors that are that are donating to the politicians to get elected. And so this is really tight knit operation, well-oiled machine fueled by a lot of money on the back end with special interests that is leading America as a society astray.  </p>
<p>00:18:29:12 - 00:18:45:10<br>Marty<br>We're dumber than ever or unhealthier than ever, and Big Pharma is reaping the benefits by pushing these pills and these shots that really don't do anything but make people customers for life at the end of the day.  </p>
<p>00:18:45:12 - 00:19:04:28<br>Chris<br>Right, Right. Yeah. And there's a lot of different things we could talk about here, Marty, that come up with this case. I mean, and maybe I'll start with a few of them here or start with one of them. The idea that, you know, consuming raw milk or other raw products is dangerous. You know, you can have your opinions on that.  </p>
<p>00:19:04:28 - 00:19:13:02<br>Chris<br>I've been drinking raw. I've been drinking raw milk for over ten years now. My children have been drinking raw milk. We've been interjecting milk.  </p>
<p>00:19:13:05 - 00:19:44:12<br>Marty<br>Can I interject for one second? The whole this is a Hegelian dialectic. The whole concept of even calling it raw milk in the first place is a propaganda technique. It was just milk until about a century ago, when I believe, as Rockefeller sort of dictated, that you need to pasteurized milk and then milk that was milk for millennia turn into raw milk and you put this label on it that has this negative connotation that scares people away from it.  </p>
<p>00:19:44:12 - 00:19:46:06<br>Marty<br>It's just milk.  </p>
<p>00:19:46:08 - 00:20:02:07<br>Chris<br>That's a that's a great point. I had never thought of that. Of course, I had often made the argument that we'd been drinking raw milk for thousands of years, but to your point, it wasn't called raw milk because that was all there was. I'd never heard of put like that. And that's that's, that's a great way to put it.  </p>
<p>00:20:02:10 - 00:20:22:26<br>Chris<br>And in the end, any time you consume any product, there is there's a level of risk. And again, the government you see I mean, there's hundreds and thousands of cases of food poisoning, if you will, different illnesses and, you know, I'm not making light of anybody getting sick, but I've made some food choices before where, you know, it really upset my stomach.  </p>
<p>00:20:22:26 - 00:20:45:21<br>Chris<br>I got pretty sick. But that was my choice. And I think there might have been some benefits to that. You have different philosophies on food and nutrition and microbes and bacteria and how you can develop nuanced immunity to different things. And if we want to be free, we need the freedom to make those choices. But I've been drinking milk, put it like that the natural way for ten years.  </p>
<p>00:20:45:24 - 00:21:16:02<br>Chris<br>And it has not made me sick. You know, my children have been drinking it. And but people out there that are opposed to this sort of thing, they have given up their responsibility. They have given up their self-government. And it was William Penn, actually the founder of Pennsylvania, where all this is happening. You know, I'm here in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and William Penn said, you know, if we won't be governed, I'm going to paraphrase this, If we won't be governed by God, will be ruled by tyrants, something to that effect.  </p>
<p>00:21:16:05 - 00:21:42:25<br>Chris<br>You know, if we won't be self-governed under the law of God, we are going to be ruled by tyrants. And for many Americans, they do not want the responsibility of making their own food choices. They want the government to tell them this is safe, this is unsafe. And what's even perhaps more concerning is that they trust the government to make those choices for them, that people still I mean, you know, you're probably like me, Marty.  </p>
<p>00:21:42:25 - 00:22:07:29<br>Chris<br>I mean, I didn't trust the government years before 2020 because years ago they were telling me it's not safe to drink milk the way my ancestors had for thousands of years. But people still, I think for many people, 2020 has just increased their utter compliance and really acceptance of a slave state where the state has become God. And that's really what this is.  </p>
<p>00:22:07:29 - 00:22:27:04<br>Chris<br>Here is the state. God does whatever the state says go, or is there a higher standard that we have a recourse to? And I would argue, and I'm not sure the perspective that you have on the show, but I would argue that in the end here, we have to go to something even higher than the American tradition and the Constitution.  </p>
<p>00:22:27:08 - 00:22:46:18<br>Chris<br>We have created the system. I'd argue with all these bureaucracy, all these departments, all this manmade law. And in the end, we have to say, look, this what the government is doing here, they must. MILLER It is evil defined by the eternal word of God, and we need to oppose it. And that's where we need to be really spending a lot of time thinking right now.  </p>
<p>00:22:46:20 - 00:23:11:15<br>Marty<br>And paraphrase one of the founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson. Like, if a law is unjust, it is your duty to disobey. I think we are we are at that point here in the United States particularly. It's really disheartening, too, because you replace God, actual God with the state as your God. The is not really an inspiring God at the end of the day at all.  </p>
<p>00:23:11:18 - 00:23:16:19<br>Marty<br>It's very and they don't do anything right. They waste money.  </p>
<p>00:23:16:22 - 00:23:36:23<br>Chris<br>The state wants to the state wants to make you a slave and take your children and sacrifice them on the altar of convenience. States like like Mo, like the ancient deities that, you know, the Israelites were tempted to worship these pagan nations. Give us your children, give us your money, give us your obedience, and we'll make your life miserable.  </p>
<p>00:23:37:00 - 00:23:39:23<br>Chris<br>And that's what that's what the state does.  </p>
<p>00:23:39:26 - 00:24:00:07<br>Marty<br>You know, you mentioned one thing there, convenience. I think that's really the biggest hurdle that we have here, is that life today seems convenient. It's very easy to pick up your phone, get on the Internet, interact with people on Twitter, you know, the shopping center, you know, the grocery store. You have all this food there. You don't have to go to the farm or, you know, to go to the farmer's market.  </p>
<p>00:24:00:07 - 00:24:21:00<br>Marty<br>You have everything you perceive you could want in the many aisles in a grocery store with money, you have access to a bank account and apps like Venmo and PayPal, and you can send and receive money as long as you're not doing particular things on social media and get on YouTube, you can get on Twitter, you can broadcast your thoughts out to the world.  </p>
<p>00:24:21:00 - 00:24:44:04<br>Marty<br>Unless there are certain thoughts doing right, doing things the hard way. I think one thing we've we've had a Texas slim Cobalt who runs K and C cattle ranch down here in Austin. We've had them on a bunch of times. And what they're really working on is a thing called the Beef initiative. And their their motto is get out and shake a rancher's hand.  </p>
<p>00:24:44:08 - 00:25:12:20<br>Marty<br>It's really overcome that convenience of going to Whole Foods or going to the grocery store to buy your beef and to go the extra mile, meet your local rancher, shake his hand and buy beef directly from him. But the sort of crux of that is foregoing that convenience that exists, and that's one thing that Americans who are dumb, fat and happy, quote unquote happy, think they're happy right now, sort of anchor to is the convenience of the modern world.  </p>
<p>00:25:12:22 - 00:25:39:03<br>Marty<br>I think that's the big hurdle we have to get over. How do we engender people to develop a sense of agency and good will to go the extra mile to figure out the convenience, to do the right thing, to get the healthy food, to get the good education, to get proper preventative health care. I think that it's not a question, but just a statement about the state of the United States of America right now.  </p>
<p>00:25:39:06 - 00:26:12:07<br>Chris<br>Yeah, yeah, we have we have a lot of work to do. I'm sure you there's a lot other things you could mention as well. But there's another part of this that to me is probably even more discouraging than the fact that we have created this manmade system, this status system, where every year, whether it's Harrisburg, the capital of Pennsylvania or Washington, D.C., the capital of the nation, we just have hundreds and hundreds of more laws being created over and over again, just tightening the grip of tyranny.  </p>
<p>00:26:12:09 - 00:26:38:27<br>Chris<br>That's concerning enough. But all of that is enabled or the tyranny that ensues from that is enabled not by the legislators, not by the governors, not by, you know, anybody up there at these high levels that we elect. And then we talk about, well, here's the important thing. You know, we got to elect someone else. All of this is enabled by ordinary people like you might have seen in those videos I shared.  </p>
<p>00:26:39:02 - 00:27:07:21<br>Chris<br>You know, there's about ten people there inside Amos Miller's farm. None of those people, from my understanding, were elected officials. None of them are high ranking people. There's three state troopers and seven employees of the Department of AG, if I understand it. You know, probably just people with families, you know, just ordinary men and women who, you know, maybe maybe went to college for some sort of environmental degree biology, got a job at the Department of Agriculture or the state troopers.  </p>
<p>00:27:07:21 - 00:27:30:10<br>Chris<br>You know, we don't want to go out there and make a difference or just get a paycheck. Those are the people that are enforcing tyranny in our nation. Those are the people. And this is this is the concern we have in our nation. We have the churches used to lead the way. You go back to, you know, the Black Robe Regiment and the American War for Independence.  </p>
<p>00:27:30:12 - 00:27:50:24<br>Chris<br>You had this idea that pastors would be out there calling on people to apply the Bible to to all of life. Did we do it perfectly? No, but we've completely lost that. And now you have these people that many of them probably you know, Lancaster County is a very rich has a rich tradition of Christianity, churches on every corner.  </p>
<p>00:27:50:27 - 00:28:21:05<br>Chris<br>Many of those people I go to church Sunday morning and then during the week, they're rating Amish farmers. And there's just this disconnect in their mind between the truth of the word of God and justice in society and in practice. They are practical statists and the state is their God, and they do whatever the state tells them. So if it's Monday morning and the state says you need to go raid this Amish man's farm, take his food, lock up the rest of his food, they say, Yes, I'll do it.  </p>
<p>00:28:21:08 - 00:28:38:22<br>Chris<br>And as long as we have Americans who are willing to enforce these mandates, these directives, we really have no hope. But we but there is hope if we can change the hearts and minds of the people. But that's where it needs to start. And so much of this, the focus is on all we get. You know, the presidential elections coming up.  </p>
<p>00:28:39:00 - 00:29:00:25<br>Chris<br>That's going to change everything. It's not going to change anything if Americans are still willing to be slaves and enslave others. You know, I'm sure people get offended if I use any analogies like this, but I don't really care. You talk about the African slave trade and you had, you know, Africans enslaving their fellow Africans to sell them into slavery.  </p>
<p>00:29:00:27 - 00:29:20:03<br>Chris<br>And the whole system is corrupt. And we have that in America. We have Americans like these state troopers and Department of AG employees who are basically selling out their neighbors in service of the state. And we get Americans willing to stand up and say, no, you know what? I'm not going to follow this order. There's a higher standard.  </p>
<p>00:29:20:07 - 00:29:25:02<br>Chris<br>We will have tyranny is what the Nazis said. I'm just following orders. And that's what these state troopers will say.  </p>
<p>00:29:25:05 - 00:29:49:16<br>Marty<br>Yeah, yeah. The Army of Karens in in our midst, that will all enslave their fellow American at the at the direction of their state leaders. But I think that's something important to really dig into. Like how much of the Karen Army going out there and taking orders is driven by fear, which is rooted in the belief that the state is all powerful.  </p>
<p>00:29:49:16 - 00:30:12:23<br>Marty<br>And if you do not listen, you will face retribution. And is there actual power behind that or is it all a big projection game? Like do we have the ability to push back against the state? I think that's what a lot of Americans, again, driven by fear. They don't think that we have any recourse to push back against the state.  </p>
<p>00:30:12:26 - 00:30:30:16<br>Chris<br>Right. Well, yeah, you mentioned a couple of things there. I mean, one, you mentioned earlier about this idea of complacency. And of course, you had the concept of bread and circuses. You know, in the Roman Empire where you keep the people entertained and fed and they'll be compliant. And we see something of that, from what I understand in China.  </p>
<p>00:30:30:16 - 00:30:58:08<br>Chris<br>I mean, just just keep the people numb, give them all the entertainment. Given the pornography. And, you know, they'll be they'll be willing slaves to the state. The only way this is going to change, I'm convinced, is is if you have and maybe it's a small group of people and a lot of things start small, but you have people who are living for something more than their own satisfaction, their own convenience, and I believe that can only happen through the gospel of Jesus Christ.  </p>
<p>00:30:58:10 - 00:31:31:15<br>Chris<br>You're going to have people who say, Look, my greatest purpose, my purpose in life is not to be at ease. My purpose in life is to honor Christ. And that includes loving my neighbor. And if I love my neighbor, you know, an Amos Miller, in a sense, the proverbial neighbor, even though he's not across the street from me, if I love my neighbor, not only Amos, but also the thousands of customers who buy their food from him because they want to be healthy if I love my neighbors, if I love if I love them and want to see justice is done, then I have to oppose injustice.  </p>
<p>00:31:31:17 - 00:31:53:26<br>Chris<br>And that's what we're missing in modern Christianity, in modern America. This idea that, well, I'm just going to go about my business and my you know, my religion is just private to me. That's not how the Old Testament prophets talk. That's not how the New Testament speaks. We are to see that justice is done. And if we care about our neighbors, we are going to want to see justice established.  </p>
<p>00:31:53:29 - 00:32:17:23<br>Chris<br>But to your other point about the fear, the thing is, at the end of the day, tyrants only have power if they have people willing to enforce their mandates. And we need I think we need a group of Americans who, one, are willing to to resist and practice civil disobedience, to say, you know, we're not following these mandates.  </p>
<p>00:32:17:25 - 00:32:39:19<br>Chris<br>And if you want to arrest Amos Miller, you're going to have to arrest all of us. But there is there is a sense there is a risk here. I mean, because you have enough you call them Karens and I call them, you know, slaves of the state or, you know, robotically going in there. Those people, as long as to them, what's more important to them is their own security.  </p>
<p>00:32:39:21 - 00:33:13:11<br>Chris<br>If that's more important than justice and righteousness, then those of us who do want to oppose this stuff, there is a risk that we are going to be locked up in prison. And there's no point in in hiding that. But as long it but that can change if the America if Americans say we're not going to to follow and enforce these mandates, if enough people like see, Amos Miller's been sticking his neck out for decades, if enough people were willing to do that, I don't think the state would even have the wherewithal and the capacity to, you know, shut it down.  </p>
<p>00:33:13:14 - 00:33:32:02<br>Chris<br>But in many ways. Amos Miller, there's other farmers like him, but in Lancaster County, I'd say he's the biggest one doing this because there are other farmers who are following all the regulations. And some of them, you know, would would, would disapprove of what Amos was doing. But I think they're missing the point that, you know, they have they have given the state an inch.  </p>
<p>00:33:32:05 - 00:33:34:04<br>Chris<br>The state's not going to be satisfied with that.  </p>
<p>00:33:34:08 - 00:34:04:17<br>Marty<br>So they give him an inch. They want another inch and they want a mile. They want everything, right. It's they never stop. It's a it's a machine with a lot of momentum behind it. And to your point of civil disobedience and the the security of the enslavers who are paid by the state, I think, again, going back to that security, it's held in that paycheck, too.  </p>
<p>00:34:04:19 - 00:34:33:27<br>Marty<br>I think this is a particularly interesting inflection point because the economic situation in the United States is systemically fragile. As we know, inflation has really affected the economy pretty acutely over the last two years. And that's what I worry about, is that you have inflation in a pretty bad spot, economic situations in a pretty bad spot. And so the state has all the leverage for the state employees, which is like, Hey, do you want this paycheck?  </p>
<p>00:34:33:27 - 00:34:58:13<br>Marty<br>Do you want to be able to buy groceries week in and week out? And that will sort of embolden them to go obey the states orders and lock up their neighbors. And that's again, and I'm not sure how familiar with Bitcoin, but that's why this started out as Bitcoin podcasts is why I work in the Bitcoin space and passionate about it, because I think the money is that the root of all of this?  </p>
<p>00:34:58:13 - 00:35:37:09<br>Marty<br>You can only fund the stupid education that teaches you the pyramid scheme of the the food pyramid. You can only fund all the pharma stuff, you can only fund all the big ag stuff with money that's printed ex nihilo. And if you have the dollar, that's the only currency that you're working for. I'm sort of beholden to that whole monetary policy and that whole monetary system, whereas Bitcoin allows you to sort of take yourself out of that and operate within a monetary system that cannot be controlled by the state or any centralized third party for that matter.  </p>
<p>00:35:37:13 - 00:36:09:21<br>Marty<br>And that's one thing I know I personally and other Bitcoiners are hoping as we transition towards 2030s, more and more people, particularly people who need it like the Amish and people want to stand up against the state and their encroachment on civil liberties. They notice Bitcoin as this way to fight back and it can provide you the security that the paycheck that the government is paying you to lock up your neighbor and over time, long enough time period period will actually provide you better security.  </p>
<p>00:36:09:21 - 00:36:30:26<br>Marty<br>And so that's the hope that people recognize this and adopt Bitcoin and that taking that action, many individuals taking that action collectively is enough of a impetus to begin standing up against the state and saying, hey, we don't need your money, we don't need your paycheck. We've got this this money over here in Bitcoin right now.  </p>
<p>00:36:30:26 - 00:36:59:07<br>Chris<br>I'm not familiar enough to make any comments on Bitcoin, but I will say as as it relates to, you know, the fiat currency, the money that the government just continues to print, another example of an unbiblical practice that leads to inflation, that leads to really theft of the next generation. And so of course, this is just another layer of tyranny where the government comes in and says we're going to control the money supply and we're going to regulate that and basically debase the currency.  </p>
<p>00:36:59:10 - 00:37:21:24<br>Chris<br>But you mentioned as well, you know, these state employees, you know, just another thing that if Americans this goes back to to the people, I really believe that Americans at this point I would have a hard time justifying, you know, someone working for the state unless they were they said, you know what, I refuse to enforce these things.  </p>
<p>00:37:21:24 - 00:37:45:15<br>Chris<br>But I think people we need to take a long, hard look. If you are employed by the state government, if you're considering it, think about what you're doing. You know, I'm not going to make a blanket statement, but it's I certainly could not work for the state and have a clean conscience. What they are doing is enforcing man made, unjust evil laws.  </p>
<p>00:37:45:15 - 00:38:07:19<br>Chris<br>The prophet Isaiah says woe to those who decree iniquitous decrees and the writers who keep writing oppression. That's what our state governments are doing. Even then, even in the reddest state, they are enforcing, they are writing man made laws and they're paying people to enforce them. And as long as Americans want that and are willing to enforce that, we're going to have a hard time at this.  </p>
<p>00:38:07:19 - 00:38:31:00<br>Chris<br>But if enough Americans are awakened and maybe through shows like yours and say, you know what, we do not want this. We want to be selfish, sponsor evil and stop working for the state. The state has no power. So that goes back to your original question. There's a fear there. Yes. But it's this vicious cycle where where the state says, we're going to we're going to take care of you.  </p>
<p>00:38:31:03 - 00:38:45:04<br>Chris<br>If you take care of us and go after your neighbors. And until we break that cycle and we're willing to pay something and give up something, our neighbors are going to keep oppressing the righteous.  </p>
<p>00:38:45:07 - 00:39:17:23<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And it's implodes on itself eventually. We've seen this throughout history. I think we're in a late stage empire situation. And similar to the Roman Empire, I mean, the parallels to the Roman Empire particularly are pretty stark and startling, specifically that the military, like Rome, the base, their currency, added a bunch of bulk metals to their coinage to the denarius slowly over time, and they expanded their military empire and take over most of the world.  </p>
<p>00:39:17:23 - 00:39:41:27<br>Marty<br>And then it got to a point where they debase their money so much that they were paying their soldiers wasn't worth anything, and they all quit and allowed the barbarians to come in and sack Rome. We had a similar situation here where we're debasing the money. I've read a newsletter about this a week ago. It startled me. First time I've run the numbers in some time, but the United States been around for 248 years.  </p>
<p>00:39:42:00 - 00:40:09:29<br>Marty<br>68% of the national debt has been accrued in the last 15 years. So 6% of the country's lifetime we've accrued 68% of the debt ballooned from 10.7 trillion in 2008, sitting at 34 trillion today, which is pretty insane. So we've debasing the currency. And if you look around the global geopolitical situation right now, we're expanding our military pretty aggressively.  </p>
<p>00:40:09:29 - 00:40:31:13<br>Marty<br>We've had some bad losses, particularly in Afghanistan. With the pull out there is pretty pretty embarrassing. And an interesting trend that I picked up on the last couple of months is military members, active military members on an on duty station across the world on TikTok like warning others do not do not join the military because the pay isn't worth it.  </p>
<p>00:40:31:13 - 00:40:57:10<br>Marty<br>I'm not making enough money. So you're having that direct parallel with the Roman army back in the day where the money, it debased it so much that it's not even worth it. You actively have active duty military members taking the tock to say don't join the army, your paycheck isn't worth it. And I think again, this is why I focus on Bitcoin, particularly because I think money is at the root of all of this.  </p>
<p>00:40:57:12 - 00:41:19:18<br>Marty<br>The the that is why Jesus went and flipped the tables at the Temple of the moneychangers because they were doing something that is probably one of the worst things you can do as a human. It's probably one of the worst things you can do because it's very sly and imperceptible. It happens slowly over time, and one day you wake up and you have 10% inflation.  </p>
<p>00:41:19:21 - 00:41:49:28<br>Marty<br>It's impossible to buy a house. The possible to buy a few bags of groceries. And you're like, How did this happen? It's like slowly but surely over time, the government and the central banks kept printing money and debasing you away. And that's what worries me. And going back to the call to action to Americans, particularly, not to obey the government, to go work for the government of a work for the state, number one, the paychecks not going to be worth it, even though they can provide you a consistent one because they can keep printing money to pay your paycheck.  </p>
<p>00:41:50:01 - 00:42:08:19<br>Marty<br>But it's extremely immoral at the end of the day, because I think it's blatantly clear that the amount of laws has been thrust. The encroachment of the state on civil liberties has gotten to a point where it is a moral situation. It is clearly immoral, at least to me. I think you would agree.  </p>
<p>00:42:08:21 - 00:42:34:09<br>Chris<br>Yeah. There's no question to me that the system that's been set up by by these government officials is evil. And we find ourselves in it. You know, we find ourselves born into this nation. And and how do we dig out of it? Out of it? So, you know, I understand people right now using the money and saying, but we need to start thinking, you know, time has passed to start thinking about how do we get out of this?  </p>
<p>00:42:34:09 - 00:42:57:23<br>Chris<br>What do we do? You know, in the meantime, of course, when people live under tyranny, they are subjected to that tyranny. And many Americans, you know, have been working for decades and and everything, all their savings, all their retirement is based on this government dollar that has been debased. And hopefully there are ways around that, not something you work on.  </p>
<p>00:42:57:26 - 00:43:22:18<br>Chris<br>But yeah, we need to change the hearts and minds of the people because at the core there needs to be an appeal to something higher than the state and. Statism is rampant in America, it's rampant in the churches. And I would define statism as as the civil government, basically claiming for itself that which Christ has given it no authority to do.  </p>
<p>00:43:22:21 - 00:43:43:02<br>Chris<br>And unless you break that in the American mind, we're really going to get nowhere, because at the end, this is a religious issue. Who's God, who's in charge, who tells us what's right and wrong? If it's a state, if there's no one above a state that says what's right and wrong, if whatever the state says goes, then the state is our God.  </p>
<p>00:43:43:05 - 00:44:06:17<br>Chris<br>And so, yeah, I was in I served in the military for and my father's in the military. But at this point, I mean, I would counsel anybody or anybody who asks me, I would say, you know what, I wouldn't join the military. In fact, even when I was in, it was very early on as I started to think through these things and civil government and biblical law, and I became very uncomfortable, you know, what are we promoting as a nation?  </p>
<p>00:44:06:23 - 00:44:30:18<br>Chris<br>You know, we endorse the slaughter of children at abortion mills. You know, we endorse homosexuality, sodomy. We debasing our currency. We are no longer a city on a hill. And until we repent, we are just we are going the way of the Roman Empire. I think it'll be a very you know, it'll be a much shorter arc for America than the Roman Empire.  </p>
<p>00:44:30:20 - 00:44:49:12<br>Marty<br>And so I think what worries people in getting go makes the convenience of the state and the convenience of life as it stands today or the perceived convenience. I would argue it's over the long run, very inconvenient certainty to the fact that you wound up enslaving yourself. What is.  </p>
<p>00:44:49:12 - 00:44:50:22<br>Chris<br>The.  </p>
<p>00:44:50:24 - 00:45:21:20<br>Marty<br>Optimistic case for getting away from the state? Like when people see this and like, oh, the government, yeah, it's it's terrible. But like, what are we going to do? It's so big. It's very entrenched in our everyday lives. Like if it were just to go away tomorrow, it seems like we'd have chaos. Is this true? What is the optimistic vision for a future in which more people stand up disobey, disengage from pushing The states wishes?  </p>
<p>00:45:21:22 - 00:45:24:27<br>Marty<br>What's the optimistic path forward?  </p>
<p>00:45:24:29 - 00:45:52:07<br>Chris<br>Yeah, well, believe it or not, I'm very optimistic. I don't know about what's going to happen in my lifetime. But again, at the core of this, for me, at the heart of this, I should say, is the guaranteed victory of the Church of Jesus Christ in the world. And I think any talk about justice, any talk about freedom, any talk about liberty, any talk about righteousness, absent the Christian worldview, is going to crumble completely.  </p>
<p>00:45:52:07 - 00:46:21:12<br>Chris<br>It is probably going to make us worse off than we are now. And so at the core is we need to, as a people, repent of our sin, you know, individually and corporately for our rejection of Christ in his word. And I think that started long ago in America, even in the 1700s. We need to repent of that because the hope is that these enemy, these are enemies, people who are who are debasing the currency, people who are raiding, you know, Amish farms, those who are supporting abortion.  </p>
<p>00:46:21:14 - 00:46:48:09<br>Chris<br>These are enemies of Christ. We need we need to revive perhaps, you know, the Christian idea of there are enemies out there. And the Bible says Christ is defeating his enemies in history. First Corinthians 15. So are are we have to start there if we are going to have any optimism about anything changing for the better? Because if we simply replace the state as our God with another manmade God is probably going to be ten times worse.  </p>
<p>00:46:48:11 - 00:47:11:18<br>Chris<br>But there is great hope in the message of the gospel. And it's not just for me personally, you know, some artistic message. It changes the culture, it changes the world. And we've seen of that over the past 2000 years. We're going through a dark, dark time right now in Western civilization, precisely because we have abandoned the gospel and the law of God.  </p>
<p>00:47:11:21 - 00:47:39:07<br>Chris<br>Now, what can we do? Small things now to get started? Well, again, I mean, I'm going to overemphasize this. People might say it's not not that important, but the churches in America need to lead the way. If you're in a church where your pastor refuses to address these issues, refuses to apply the Bible to the issue of abortion, to the issue of currency, to the issue of food freedom, you got to get out of there because we are not salt in this world.  </p>
<p>00:47:39:07 - 00:47:58:15<br>Chris<br>If we're not applying the truth of God's word to these areas, we're not loving our neighbor. So start there, but also start taking responsibility for your own life. My goodness, if you're if you're sending your kids to the government school, start right there. I mean, get them out of there and start teaching them. And you might not think you're qualified.  </p>
<p>00:47:58:15 - 00:48:22:03<br>Chris<br>I'll tell you what, you're way more qualified than some statists working for, you know, the government. They have an agenda there. They want to indoctrinate your children, educate your own children. Get get in a church where the law of God is applied to society and start you know what? Start making some risks. I know not all of us can go out right away and be like, Hey, I'm going to defy every man made mandate.  </p>
<p>00:48:22:06 - 00:48:44:12<br>Chris<br>But you know what? We can start small and this is just as important. We can support those people that are defying them. Amos Miller I think what's this? His case is going to hinge on whether or not the community local here and even nationwide gets behind him more than just donating, which is important. You can go to the links to Patriot dot com slash help.  </p>
<p>00:48:44:12 - 00:49:01:21<br>Chris<br>Amos for more information on that. But because they want to shut him down, they want his business closed. But are we willing to take any risks? Amos has taken a lot of risks over the years. Are we willing to to stand by these people and say, you know what, If you're going to arrest them, you're going to arrest me, too?  </p>
<p>00:49:01:24 - 00:49:18:21<br>Chris<br>These are things we got to think about. It's going to be small, but but a lot of these things, you know, I don't know how many people were involved in the Boston Tea Party. I don't think it was, you know, thousands of people. Things, you know, sparks that change a nation and change a culture can start with a small group of people.  </p>
<p>00:49:18:23 - 00:49:48:14<br>Chris<br>But we need to have the foundation of where we're coming from. And that's one concern I have, Marty. I mean that I see I see a lot of discouragement, unrest, frustration, and rightfully so, you know, with the left, for example. But the solution is just is as bad as the problem. It's just more manmade law, more tyranny. And unless we have freedom as defined by God's word, we will have no way of knowing what you know, left from right here.  </p>
<p>00:49:48:14 - 00:49:53:03<br>Chris<br>And we'll just be digging ourself into a deeper and deeper pit.  </p>
<p>00:49:53:05 - 00:50:21:25<br>Marty<br>Yeah, Small acts doesn't take much. I believe that was 2%, maybe 3% of the population upwards. Estimates of 10% of the individuals living in the colonies during the time of the American Revolution were the ones that actually brought forth the revolution. A very small minority, the intolerant minority, can have an outsized effect. And I would echo that like we need to, the state should not be our guide.  </p>
<p>00:50:22:01 - 00:50:54:05<br>Marty<br>I think we have these God given inalienable rights that people have completely forgotten about and just thrown to the wayside. And again, it astonishes me that today people are willing to let the state come in, dictate their lives, make more rules. I mean, as we're hyper focused on this and Bitcoin or an example like Elizabeth Warren and all these politicians trying to demonize Bitcoin and its many people backing them like, yeah, shut it down.  </p>
<p>00:50:54:05 - 00:51:24:00<br>Marty<br>And for me personally, it's like kidding me, like I as an individual can't have the agency to look at the the market for monetary goods and decide what I think is best for me. The state needs to tell me what what money I can use and the money that they tell me is the only money I can use is being consistently debased and they're taking out ungodly amounts of debt and then using that money to funnel it into education.  </p>
<p>00:51:24:00 - 00:51:49:12<br>Marty<br>That's making people stupider, more docile into food, that's making us unhealthier, into health care that really doesn't help our health at the end of the day, and most importantly, into endless wars that lead to mass deaths and suffering in other parts of the world. And I don't want that done in my name and in the state and the people cheering the state or saying, no, like Bitcoin is bad.  </p>
<p>00:51:49:15 - 00:52:19:05<br>Marty<br>You're forced to use this this cookbook, this this petrodollar, this war dollar, if you will. It's insanity. It's literally insane when you get back to first principles and you do wonder, like, does anybody the most people out there even think that they have the potential for agency at the end of the day or where they bought into a system where they think the first principle and sort of fact of life is that the state tells you what to do long remember there.  </p>
<p>00:52:19:05 - 00:52:21:06<br>Marty<br>But I think no, I mean.  </p>
<p>00:52:21:09 - 00:52:47:12<br>Chris<br>Yeah, that's where we're at. That's that that's at the heart of it. And I think the reason one of the reasons we are here as a people in America is because long ago we abandoned this idea that the law of God is supreme. And we've said, you know, what our system we've created has become the the most the most important thing.  </p>
<p>00:52:47:12 - 00:53:09:22<br>Chris<br>I mean, if you went out and talked to people on the streets and said, you know what? What's especially you start talking about politics or government, you know, what's the most important document ever written? They're going to say the US Constitution. And that's a big problem for me because the US Constitution, as great as it was and still is in some ways is not perfect.  </p>
<p>00:53:09:22 - 00:53:41:02<br>Chris<br>It's not inherent. Only the Word of God is. And when we have generations of people being taught that, you know what, we can't question what the government does because they are they are supreme. Whatever they say is the supreme law of the land, you know, then we're never going to get anywhere. We have to come back to the point where we say the standard above all people, including the US Constitution, is the law, Word of God.  </p>
<p>00:53:41:08 - 00:54:14:24<br>Chris<br>If it's not, Marty, I would debate anybody that would say, you know what, now we can have justice if we have another standard, we can't. There's no other way unless people submit to the ultimate authority, which is Christ. If not, it's going to be chaos. It always is every time. And you can't you know, if you go the status route and you go even the Republican route, they're going to oppose true freedom because their ultimate standard is not the law of liberty found in scripture.  </p>
<p>00:54:14:27 - 00:54:30:23<br>Chris<br>It is manmade law. And that is a cruel taskmaster. You know, and and whatever, you know, freedom choices with the food, with money, Bitcoin or anything else, it's going to be opposed because it doesn't serve the interests of the man made government.  </p>
<p>00:54:30:26 - 00:54:36:21<br>Marty<br>No. And the piles of money behind it in special interest rates.  </p>
<p>00:54:36:21 - 00:54:38:23<br>Chris<br>Uh, they want the money.  </p>
<p>00:54:38:25 - 00:55:03:01<br>Marty<br>But again, I think it's a I think it's doomed to implode on itself. I think, as you mentioned, the Bible says God always wins in the end. And hopefully between now and the inevitable implosion of the government, more people can wake up to this is that's what I worry about is if you have a complete implosion and and chaos, if you will, could be bad.  </p>
<p>00:55:03:03 - 00:55:21:28<br>Marty<br>But hopefully there's a middle ground where people can wake up, notice the government actually isn't as strong as it projects itself to be. You have more power as an individual here, more agency as an individual just takes the courage to speak up, to stand up, to push back. It's really not that hard. It's been done many times throughout history.  </p>
<p>00:55:22:00 - 00:55:40:21<br>Marty<br>And I think today particularly, we actually had the best opportunity to do this due to the telecommunications, technology and social media. It's a double edged sword. Yeah, it's pretty terrible in lots of ways, but it's also very good in lots of ways because it allows people to instill confidence in each other. Like, Hey, I'm thinking this too. I know you're thinking this.  </p>
<p>00:55:40:24 - 00:55:56:07<br>Marty<br>It's like the silent majority being like, are you saying this? Or you think, Yes, we're all thinking this. Let's stand up, let's push back. It's time the government has gotten too big, too hubristic, and you're leading everybody astray, making everybody's life worse off. So.  </p>
<p>00:55:56:10 - 00:56:06:27<br>Chris<br>Yeah, silver lining. Perhaps people will, you know, things like this and where we're at will. Cause, you know, the average American, the the commoner, I think is part of the title of your podcast. Right.  </p>
<p>00:56:06:29 - 00:56:07:24<br>Marty<br>Truth for the Commoner.  </p>
<p>00:56:07:24 - 00:56:25:10<br>Chris<br>Yes, Truth for the commoner. I mean, we'll start to wake up. I know there is a period of my life where I really started to say, wait a minute, what's going on here? Is it is it a loving neighbor to to regulate raw milk to to prevent when we had we have five children, at least two of them when they were born.  </p>
<p>00:56:25:10 - 00:56:47:11<br>Chris<br>The midwife who helped deliver our children was breaking the law. I think she was committing a felony. A felony, I should say, when she was doing that, because the state we were in at the time did not recognize her as a midwife. Meanwhile, babies can be aborted at the Planned Parenthood down the road. So until Americans wait a minute, something's wrong here.  </p>
<p>00:56:47:13 - 00:57:09:07<br>Chris<br>Love of neighbor is now criminalized and hatred of neighbor is authorized. Something is wrong here. Something's wrong with the money issue. Something's wrong with the food. Something's wrong with the issue of life. We can no longer blindly and we should never have. But we can no longer blindly submit to the state and say, Well, whatever the state says, they're God.  </p>
<p>00:57:09:07 - 00:57:30:13<br>Chris<br>That's it. It is leading us into a horrible place. So hope, you know, this can help. You know, the work you're doing, the situation with Amos Miller, that that we can have something of a change in the American mind because if not, the tyranny will only increase for our children. And that's the thing people really need to think about.  </p>
<p>00:57:30:16 - 00:57:49:21<br>Chris<br>If they say, well, yeah, this is bad, but I don't really want to resist that, you're just leaving it for your children, then, you know, if we're not willing to take risks now and oppose this stuff, we're going to make it that much harder for our children to do it. And if we're not setting the example for our children, you know, we're we're failing them.  </p>
<p>00:57:49:21 - 00:58:10:05<br>Chris<br>And I've talked to I've spoken with people who said, you know, their parents generation, they're part of the problem that got us here. They were complacent. They were at ease. They said, well, we're not going to try to apply the principles of justice and righteousness from the Bible in the civil sphere. We don't want to do that. And now look where we are.  </p>
<p>00:58:10:08 - 00:58:17:27<br>Chris<br>So we need to start taking action, even if it costs us because it's going to cost our children even more.  </p>
<p>00:58:18:00 - 00:58:44:15<br>Marty<br>Completely agree. Two young boys myself, I'm thinking that's when I do what I do and don't want them to grow up in a digital slavery because that's what they're trying to push us towards. Chris, thank you for the work that you're doing. The on the ground coverage is very important. I think it's crazy what you can do in the middle of Lancaster County, running right, running your own publication and then it can get out to the world.  </p>
<p>00:58:44:15 - 00:59:02:22<br>Marty<br>You have Tom Massey tweeting about it. That is, again, the beauty of social media and the beauty of taking agency and put taking the effort to actually get out there and report this as it's going on because we need more eyes on this. So, Chris, thank you for the work that you're doing. Where can anybody who's listening to this find out more about your work?  </p>
<p>00:59:02:28 - 00:59:15:12<br>Marty<br>How can they follow along with the Atlas Miller Pace and what can they do? I know you mentioned donate, but and we've talked about getting out there to so big, but anything else that we didn't mention that people should be aware of.  </p>
<p>00:59:15:14 - 00:59:33:02<br>Chris<br>Well yeah I would recommend go to the links or patriot dot com sign up for our email updates. Follow us on Twitter or x Facebook gab. I think there's going to be some more stuff happening very soon that I'm hoping will get even more reach than the initial raid. As unfortunate as that was, it was able to be.  </p>
<p>00:59:33:04 - 00:59:52:13<br>Chris<br>It was shared with a lot of people. I think something else big is coming up. I think it's going to be exciting. It's going to be an opportunity to resist, to show, you know, the state that people are behind. Amos Miller So make sure you're you're following our accounts, whether it's Twitter or Facebook or just sign up for email updates.  </p>
<p>00:59:52:16 - 01:00:11:20<br>Chris<br>And this we're not going to stop with this because if we roll over on this, the state keeps going. If they're if they're resisted, then they've really got to think twice before. If it's just Amos Miller they're up against, you know, they might be able to win. But if it's the American people, it's going to be a bit more of a problem.  </p>
<p>01:00:11:20 - 01:00:19:11<br>Chris<br>So go the extra Patriot dot com and follow us and hopefully we'll have more information, more coverage as we go here.  </p>
<p>01:00:19:14 - 01:00:26:23<br>Marty<br>Keep crushing across. I think we're going to win. We're going to win slowly but surely if someone gets it. That's all we got today for peace and love. Okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[Scrib]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>This post was originally published on <np-embed url="https://tftc.io"><a href="https://tftc.io">https://tftc.io</a></np-embed> by Marty Bent.</p>
<p><a href="https://tftc.io/amos-miller-persecution/">Read original post</a></p>
<h3><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h3>
<p>This episode dives into the pressing issue of food security with Chris Hume from the Lancaster Patriot. The conversation revolves around the recent raid on Amos Miller's organic farm by Pennsylvania state troopers and the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Miller has been selling meat directly to his community, which led to the raid based on a search warrant citing incidents dating back to 2016, where individuals allegedly became sick after consuming his products. The warrant also highlighted that Miller had not complied with state licensing and registration requirements.</p>
<p>The discussion highlights the broader implications of the state's intervention in the food industry, particularly affecting small-scale and organic farmers like Miller, who is Amish. The Amish community has historically been successful in maintaining a degree of separation from the heavily regulated food industry. However, the recent raid suggests a concerning trend of the state attempting to force compliance with regulations that favor large, centralized food producers.</p>
<p>Chris Hume emphasizes the need for food freedom and the right to choose what we consume as a fundamental aspect of liberty. He also discusses the role of the state in enforcing regulations, often at the expense of small businesses and individual rights. The conversation touches upon the importance of opposing unjust laws and the potential for civil disobedience to protect freedoms.</p>
<p>[</p>
<p>State Agents Execute Search Warrant at Amos Miller’s Organic Farm in Lancaster County</p>
<p>The details surrounding the search warrant and the reasons for this government intervention at Miller’s farm remain unclear. However, such actions are not unprecedented; Miller has previously faced scrutiny for selling organic meat without adhering to certain regulatory procedures.</p>
<p><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/size/w256h256/2023/12/TFTC_02_Black-2--1-.png" alt="">TFTC – Truth for the CommonerStaff</p>
<p><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/size/w1200/2024/01/humble_farmer_state_troopers_midjourney.png" alt=""></p>
<p>](<np-embed url="https://tftc.io/amos-miller-raid/"><a href="https://tftc.io/amos-miller-raid/">https://tftc.io/amos-miller-raid/</a></np-embed>)</p>
<h3><strong>Best Quotes</strong></h3>
<ol>
<li>"If we don't have the freedom to choose what we eat, what freedom do we have?" – Chris Hume</li>
<li>"The government doesn't care about our health and safety. What they want is control and they want compliant subjects." – Chris Hume</li>
<li>"If we continue to roll over here and let the government tell us what we can and can't eat. We're not going to have a society left to even offer these products." – Chris Hume</li>
<li>"Woe to those who decree iniquitous decrees and the writers who keep writing oppression." – Chris Hume, quoting the prophet Isaiah</li>
<li>"If the law is unjust, it is your duty to disobey." – Marty, paraphrasing Thomas Jefferson</li>
</ol>
<h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3>
<p>The conversation between Marty and Chris Hume serves as a clarion call for the preservation of food freedom and the right to self-determination in the face of increasing state intervention. The raid on Amos Miller's farm is not just an isolated incident but a symbol of the broader struggle between small-scale, traditional food producers and the regulatory state that favors industrialized agriculture.</p>
<p>The key takeaway from this discussion is the importance of standing up for individual liberties and supporting those who resist unjust laws. As the conversation suggests, the fight for food freedom is deeply intertwined with the principles of justice, self-governance, and opposition to tyranny. It is a reminder that complacency in the face of government overreach can lead to the erosion of fundamental freedoms, not just in the realm of food production but across all aspects of life.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the conversation underscores the need for a collective awakening to the dangers of statism and the importance of reclaiming the rights endowed by our Creator, rather than those dictated by the state. It is a call to action for individuals to take responsibility for their choices and to support those who courageously defend our inalienable rights.</p>
<h3>Links</h3>
<p>Follow Chris on <a href="https://twitter.com/chrishume1689?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>Follow The Lancaster Patriot on <a href="https://twitter.com/TheLanPatriot?ref=tftc.io">Twitter</a></p>
<p>Check out The Lancaster Patriot <a href="https://www.thelancasterpatriot.com/?ref=tftc.io">website</a></p>
<h3>Sponsors</h3>
<p><a href="https://river.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/product2--1--2.gif" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://unchnd.co/tftc?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/09/image.png" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://joincrowdhealth.com/tftc?ref=tftc.io"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/11/2023-11-01-00.29.50.jpg" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bitcointalent.co/?ref=tftc"><img src="https://tftc.io/content/images/2023/05/Frame-58.png" alt=""></a></p>
<h3><strong>Timestamps</strong></h3>
<p>0:00 - Intro<br>6:17 - Amos Miller raided<br>10:42 - State dislikes independent communities<br>14:28 - The problem of positive law<br>19:01 - The state removes your choices<br>24:59 - “Raw” milk and choosing for yourself<br>29:00 - Forgoing convenience<br>32:01 - Those who enable tyranny<br>40:02 - Money printing gives the state leverage<br>48:47 - Statism vs Christianity<br>1:00:52 - Pushing back<br>1:04:45 - Wrapping up</p>
<h3>Transcript</h3>
<p>00:00:03:10 - 00:00:31:24<br>Marty<br>Welcome back to TFT. I'm sitting down with Chris HUME from the Lancaster Patriot to talk about a topic that we've covered loosely over the last few years, which is food security. Last week, Amos Miller had Pennsylvania State troopers come and raid his farm because of the fact that he was selling meat directly to his community. Chris, you were on site covering the situation.  </p>
<p>00:00:31:24 - 00:00:37:00<br>Marty<br>What went on that day, I believe, was Wednesday or Thursday of last week.  </p>
<p>00:00:37:02 - 00:00:57:04<br>Chris<br>Yeah, thanks for having me on, Marty. Yeah, it was Thursday morning. I received a phone call from someone letting me know that Amos was being raided yet again. This is not the first time this has happened to Amos. I got the phone call. State troopers are there. So when I got there, I don't know how long the state troopers had already been on site.  </p>
<p>00:00:57:04 - 00:01:19:20<br>Chris<br>And there were as well as state troopers. There were employees of the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. And so the state troopers are really just providing security, quote unquote. So these employees of the state Department of Agriculture obtained a search warrant to enter Amos Miller's farm and search his products. So they were inside the building there. They would not let me in.  </p>
<p>00:01:19:20 - 00:01:36:18<br>Chris<br>They turned me away. From what I understand, they wouldn't even allow Amos Miller, the owner of the farm, inside his own buildings while they were conducting the search warrant. So we don't know exactly what they did in there. I mean, and sometimes it can be difficult to get police body cam footage. So it's hard to say. You know what?  </p>
<p>00:01:36:18 - 00:01:56:28<br>Chris<br>They tracked in with them. They took out some of Amos products, but they were in there ostensibly testing his products and confiscating seizing some of his property and then leaving a detainment order saying that I don't believe it's all of his products, but a lot of his products cannot be used. They're sold or it can't even be disposed of.  </p>
<p>00:01:57:00 - 00:02:09:18<br>Chris<br>But that was the initial the initial scene, about five vehicles there, two state trooper vehicles, three state trooper individuals there. And preventing entrance into the into the farm store.  </p>
<p>00:02:09:20 - 00:02:12:27<br>Marty<br>What was the justification of the search warrant?  </p>
<p>00:02:12:29 - 00:02:41:16<br>Chris<br>So the search warrant there was an interesting search warrant. This was from an employee, I believe is Sherry Morris within the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. The search warrant cited incidents going all the way back to 2016, which is interesting. So basically, Amos Miller, just for your listeners, that might not be aware, Amos Miller has been conducting his organic farm operations here in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, I'd say for at least two decades.  </p>
<p>00:02:41:16 - 00:03:06:03<br>Chris<br>I think he took over from his father and he's continued to improve his operations, and he has customers all over the nation. And the search warrant cited some different incidences dating back to 2016 where apparently someone I believe it was in California, someone allegedly got sick and they allegedly consumed some of Amos products. All of this is very vague.  </p>
<p>00:03:06:05 - 00:03:35:09<br>Chris<br>There's really not a direct link to Amos Miller, I think, in many of this stuff. But so they listed several incidents saying, well, someone got sick and they had Amos products. And so the search warrant kind of listed different years, different incidents. And then the latest thing was in December of 2023. So just this past month, apparently an individual in New York and another individual in Michigan, I believe, got sick, went to the hospital.  </p>
<p>00:03:35:12 - 00:04:04:04<br>Chris<br>And allegedly, those people were they had E coli. They got sick for me coli. And once again, they had consumed or potentially consumed or purchased products from Amos Miller Store. All of this is kind of vague, but in the end, the real justification on the search warrant, all of those things as far as, oh, someone may have potentially gotten sick, all of that was directed towards I think it's the last paragraph of the search warrant for Amos Miller is not licensed.  </p>
<p>00:04:04:06 - 00:04:24:25<br>Chris<br>He's not registered. He has not jumped through the bureaucratic hoops that the state has sworn him to. And so that's really what this is about at the end. I think the claims of sickness are just a pretense to shut down Amos Miller, because at the end of the day, the search warrant says, you know, he is not licensed, he's not registered, he didn't follow our mandates.  </p>
<p>00:04:25:02 - 00:04:28:05<br>Chris<br>And that's why I want to be allowed in there.  </p>
<p>00:04:28:07 - 00:04:44:15<br>Marty<br>In this particular case, between the state of Pennsylvania and Amos and previously the federal government in Amos is very interesting because Amos, if I'm correct, is Amish, correct. He's part of the Amish community, Lancaster County.  </p>
<p>00:04:44:16 - 00:04:45:04<br>Chris<br>Right.  </p>
<p>00:04:45:07 - 00:05:14:18<br>Marty<br>Now. Growing up in Philadelphia, we had Redding Terminal in Philadelphia, and that was one of the best sections of writing Terminal was the Amish section. They would come in from Lancaster, sell their baked goods, their meat, and everybody loved it. And the Amish have done a particularly good job sort of bifurcating and inoculating themselves from the rest of society, the modernized, industrialized, digitized society here in the United States.  </p>
<p>00:05:14:18 - 00:05:38:01<br>Marty<br>And they've done a very good job of running successful businesses and living in their own community, particularly in Lancaster County and other parts of the country, obviously parts of Appalachia as well. And I think this is a big point in the history of the Amish in the United States. They've sort of had their ability to run their operations.  </p>
<p>00:05:38:01 - 00:05:58:00<br>Marty<br>They do it very well. People love it again. People in Philadelphia love the the Amish section of running terminal. And the state seems to want a cattle herd, everybody towards these hyper regulated parts of the food industry, which is dominated by very few players in the Amish for a long time. So we're not going to play that game.  </p>
<p>00:05:58:03 - 00:06:08:10<br>Marty<br>We make good food, we do it in a good way. We rejoin the farm, we take care of our animals, we take care of our customers. And it seems like the state does not like that.  </p>
<p>00:06:08:12 - 00:06:29:12<br>Chris<br>Right. And I think this is, you know, maybe something of a boiling point. I'm not sure. In one sense. I hope it does galvanize not just the Amish, but Americans in general to stand up for food freedom. You know, if we don't have the freedom to choose what we eat, what freedom do we have? But I think there's a challenge here and there's a lot of directions we could go with this, Marty.  </p>
<p>00:06:29:12 - 00:06:51:13<br>Chris<br>But but the Amish, you know, in the 1960s, I believe they really took a stand against government education. And they said, we do not want to send our children to the state to be educated. And that was a big deal because generally speaking, the Amish, you know, a Baptist background, they don't really want to stir things up. They want to be left to themselves, but they did take a stand with government education.  </p>
<p>00:06:51:13 - 00:07:14:10<br>Chris<br>And I believe some people even went to jail over that. Some Amish men even went to jail because of their defiance of the government. In that case, which again, is is somewhat out of character for the typical Amish mindset. And I think what Amos Miller is up against here is not only up against the statists in the federal government and in this case, the state government.  </p>
<p>00:07:14:12 - 00:07:37:04<br>Chris<br>He's also up against a general mindset. First of all, I'd say in the American mind that we need the government to regulate these things to keep us safe. That's a big problem in America. But he's also, I think, up against somewhat within the Amish community itself. Will the Amish community as a whole get behind Amos or will they say, you know what, we just got to follow these regulations?  </p>
<p>00:07:37:06 - 00:07:58:05<br>Chris<br>And as it stands now, my understanding here being here in Lancaster County, I think there's some hesitancy for the community as a whole, the Amish community, to really get behind what Amos is doing. And I hope that this situation and I hope we don't have to have more like this, will galvanize them to say, you know what, we need to make a stand like we did in the sixties over government education.  </p>
<p>00:07:58:07 - 00:08:15:08<br>Chris<br>If if we continue to roll over here and let the government tell us what we can and can't eat, you know, we're not going to have a society left to even offer these products. You know, the Amish way of life will end, and not to mention freedom for many other people.  </p>
<p>00:08:15:10 - 00:08:49:15<br>Marty<br>Yeah, I recall seeing you interview a pastor, I believe it was Friday or Thursday afternoon. And when we get back to first principles and essentially what Amazon and other Amish farmers are doing, they're essentially trying to provide a good service to their community, raise animals, raise crops, deliver that high quality food to consumers, consumers making an educated decision, hey, I think this guy is doing a good job running his farm.  </p>
<p>00:08:49:15 - 00:09:11:07<br>Marty<br>I think his food tastes good. I think it's healthy. I want to purchase that food from him. If a peer to peer interaction there, the state feels compelled to interject themselves into at any given point in time. And I thought that interview you had with the priest was pretty illuminating because you get back to like biblical sort of the biblical stance on this.  </p>
<p>00:09:11:10 - 00:09:29:27<br>Marty<br>Like if there's no harm done, there shouldn't be any crime and there shouldn't be any persecute action on behalf of or towards the person providing the service. Could you elaborate on what what the pastor said during that brief interview with him?  </p>
<p>00:09:30:00 - 00:09:54:09<br>Chris<br>Yeah, that was Pastor Joel saying he's a pastor here in Lancaster County of Independence, Reformed Bible Church, RBC Dot Church. If you want more information on Pastor Joel. And one of the things I really appreciate about Pastor Joel is that from the pulpit and also just throughout the week, he is engaging in the public with with the law, word of God, and explaining how the Bible applies to all of life.  </p>
<p>00:09:54:11 - 00:10:25:12<br>Chris<br>And that's one of the things in it's very sad in America where we've where we're at right now, where we are, we we have such a a tradition, a history of Christian thought and Bible based ethics, and we've abandoned that. And one of the important things that Pastor Joel brought up in that interaction was this idea of administrative law and the government, you know, interjecting itself in in interactions between people.  </p>
<p>00:10:25:12 - 00:10:49:21<br>Chris<br>So if you if you look at the Bible to look at biblical law, it's it's ensuring that justice is done between a man and his neighbor. So those those are the two parties in the in the interaction, if you will. It's me and my neighbor. It's me and someone else. And if I wrong someone, then that person can can go to the magistrate and say, hey, I've been wronged by this person, here's my case.  </p>
<p>00:10:49:24 - 00:11:11:27<br>Chris<br>And that's that's you know, there's much more we can get into there, Marty. But in a nutshell, that's the biblical idea of justice. Now, there's some more things we could cover, but the point is, the state coming in, we've created a status system in America where the civil government now is proactively trying to, quote unquote, protect and manage our affairs.  </p>
<p>00:11:12:00 - 00:11:33:24<br>Chris<br>And R.J. Rushdoony years ago said once, once the law becomes positive in the sense that that the government can make laws that say, hey, we're going to make all these laws in order to protect the health of the people. Once that becomes the M.O. of a society, tyranny is inevitable because the government will now say it is in our interests to protect you.  </p>
<p>00:11:33:25 - 00:11:51:16<br>Chris<br>So now every law we make, we have authority to do this because it's in your best interest. Biblical law says, look, if someone has wronged you, now, you go to the magistrate. And of course, in Amos's case, you know, and people can have complaints about a business and we could talk about that as well, you know, willing seller, willing buyer.  </p>
<p>00:11:51:23 - 00:12:18:20<br>Chris<br>But I don't have a problem with people saying, Hey, I got a complaint about this product or that product. But as far as saying that he has he's done evil, That's we don't see that in this case. Nothing Amos has done violates the law of God. Nothing Amos has done is immoral. Amos has simply run afoul of a statist government, saying, You have to follow our regulations if you want to serve your neighbor.  </p>
<p>00:12:18:22 - 00:12:42:21<br>Chris<br>And this is really the bane of manmade law in America. We elect these officials. And I think one of the worst things we do, whether we vote Democrat or Republican, is we assume and we continue this idea that they can just make law and they have the authority to tell us, you know, if we made a law. So therefore, now you have to follow this regulation.  </p>
<p>00:12:42:23 - 00:12:48:11<br>Chris<br>And that's that's an affront, a violation of biblical law.  </p>
<p>00:12:48:13 - 00:13:16:25<br>Marty<br>And not only is an affront to biblical law, but the state's interjection between these peer to peer transactions with willing participants is completely counterproductive, because you look at the state, particularly the agricultural industry in the United States, it's hyper centralized. The end product is frankly unhealthy for people. We have diabetes rates at all time highs with childhood diabetes rates at all time highs.  </p>
<p>00:13:16:27 - 00:13:47:21<br>Marty<br>Life expectancy is falling here in the United States. Heart disease is leading killer, one of the top three leading killers. Now it's Vietnam, I believe, but heart disease is still up there in the States. Interjection in this market has not produced a positive outcome for all of society, yet they keep doubling, tripling, quadrupling, down to the point where, again, they're attacking an Amish community that is sort of had this unwritten agreement with the rest of society in the United States, like, Hey, leave us alone, we're going to do our thing.  </p>
<p>00:13:47:21 - 00:14:10:18<br>Marty<br>And that's been going pretty well and good for many decades now. And now they seem to be grasping for more here. And again, the outcome has been completely counterproductive and a net negative for society overall. We need more decentralized, distributed regenerative farmers in the world, particularly in the U.S. And the government is directly attacking that right now.  </p>
<p>00:14:10:20 - 00:14:30:22<br>Chris<br>Right. Yeah. And there's a passage in the Bible. It says the fallow ground of the poor would yield much food, but it is swept away through injustice. So you have this idea of and, you know, somebody might say, well, Amos Miller, he's not a really tiny, tiny farmer, but in the grand scheme of things, he's a small farmer compared to the huge industrial commercial producers.  </p>
<p>00:14:30:25 - 00:14:51:17<br>Chris<br>I would say he's probably one of the the bigger of the small farmers. So he's the target of the government because if they can shut him down now, then they can go next. I mean, and if you think, you know, you got to even smaller operation than Amos Miller's and you think you're safe, you're not. Unless the people oppose this and resist this tyranny.  </p>
<p>00:14:51:19 - 00:15:16:27<br>Chris<br>And you're right, it's completely counterproductive. And that's why the scripture over and over again talks about how when, when when tyrants oppress the poor and they exact taxes on the grain, it hurts. It hurts everybody. And, you know, it's just very interesting to hear, you know, overwhelmingly I'm hearing a ton of support for Amos. But there are people that are still out there saying, you know, you just got to it's got to follow the government regulations here.  </p>
<p>00:15:17:00 - 00:15:50:24<br>Chris<br>And that's another problem that people think the government actually cares about. Our safety actually cares about our health when we have, you know, not not to mention the vaccine that was pushed by by government bureaucrats, not to mention that millions of babies are murdered via abortion, you know, with the approving nod of government officials, all the commercial products with all the the additives and the chemicals they have no problem with any of that stuff, because at the end of the day, you know, those companies are lobbying them, they're paying their corporate taxes, they're benefiting.  </p>
<p>00:15:50:27 - 00:16:14:20<br>Chris<br>The government doesn't care about our health and our safety. What they want is control and they want compliant subjects. And Amos Miller represents the antithesis of that. He represents the antithesis of the nanny state. The nanny state wants us to basically have no other option but to buy the slop that the government mandates. It's the same as education, actually, my pastor Joel was talking about this.  </p>
<p>00:16:14:22 - 00:16:36:09<br>Chris<br>It's the same thing with education. The government wants you to have no other option than to send your kids to the government schools. They want that to be the only choice you have and your children to consume that ideological slop in the government classrooms. It's the same thing they want with the food. They want you to have no choice but to go to a government, approved a food producer and eat that slop.  </p>
<p>00:16:36:10 - 00:16:54:03<br>Chris<br>And many Americans, thankfully, are still are not willing to give that up. But I'm concerned, Marty, that many Americans are and that I'm just not sure where we're at as a nation and where this is going to go. And if we can't if we don't have the freedom to eat and choose what we eat, we really don't have freedom less.  </p>
<p>00:16:54:03 - 00:16:58:23<br>Chris<br>This is not in many ways, this is no longer the land of the free.  </p>
<p>00:16:58:25 - 00:17:20:04<br>Marty<br>I mean, choosing what you eat. I mean, energy is the basis of life, and food provides that energy to humans to allow us to go toil and work throughout the economy. And if we're not allowed to choose the energy that we're putting into our bodies, what autonomy do we have, if anything? Like everything you just mentioned there, like the government is a well-oiled machine.  </p>
<p>00:17:20:04 - 00:17:44:14<br>Marty<br>You get the education, the food industry and the farm industry, particularly in this triangle, I would say, that are tightly knitted. You have the education and the education system feeding you the food pyramid, which is actively just complete B.S. It's here learning you got to eat ten servings of grain a day. Don't eat meat, don't eat butter. You know, all these saturated fats.  </p>
<p>00:17:44:16 - 00:18:02:07<br>Marty<br>You're learning that in school and then you're going to the shopping center and you've got all this industrial sludge, the soy slop, if you will. And then on the back end, when that waste slop gets you nice and sick and off you go to the health care system with big pharma behind it to feed you all these pills that never really make you better.  </p>
<p>00:18:02:07 - 00:18:29:09<br>Marty<br>They just maintain and keep you a client in all of this, as you alluded to, is filled by the donors that are that are donating to the politicians to get elected. And so this is really tight knit operation, well-oiled machine fueled by a lot of money on the back end with special interests that is leading America as a society astray.  </p>
<p>00:18:29:12 - 00:18:45:10<br>Marty<br>We're dumber than ever or unhealthier than ever, and Big Pharma is reaping the benefits by pushing these pills and these shots that really don't do anything but make people customers for life at the end of the day.  </p>
<p>00:18:45:12 - 00:19:04:28<br>Chris<br>Right, Right. Yeah. And there's a lot of different things we could talk about here, Marty, that come up with this case. I mean, and maybe I'll start with a few of them here or start with one of them. The idea that, you know, consuming raw milk or other raw products is dangerous. You know, you can have your opinions on that.  </p>
<p>00:19:04:28 - 00:19:13:02<br>Chris<br>I've been drinking raw. I've been drinking raw milk for over ten years now. My children have been drinking raw milk. We've been interjecting milk.  </p>
<p>00:19:13:05 - 00:19:44:12<br>Marty<br>Can I interject for one second? The whole this is a Hegelian dialectic. The whole concept of even calling it raw milk in the first place is a propaganda technique. It was just milk until about a century ago, when I believe, as Rockefeller sort of dictated, that you need to pasteurized milk and then milk that was milk for millennia turn into raw milk and you put this label on it that has this negative connotation that scares people away from it.  </p>
<p>00:19:44:12 - 00:19:46:06<br>Marty<br>It's just milk.  </p>
<p>00:19:46:08 - 00:20:02:07<br>Chris<br>That's a that's a great point. I had never thought of that. Of course, I had often made the argument that we'd been drinking raw milk for thousands of years, but to your point, it wasn't called raw milk because that was all there was. I'd never heard of put like that. And that's that's, that's a great way to put it.  </p>
<p>00:20:02:10 - 00:20:22:26<br>Chris<br>And in the end, any time you consume any product, there is there's a level of risk. And again, the government you see I mean, there's hundreds and thousands of cases of food poisoning, if you will, different illnesses and, you know, I'm not making light of anybody getting sick, but I've made some food choices before where, you know, it really upset my stomach.  </p>
<p>00:20:22:26 - 00:20:45:21<br>Chris<br>I got pretty sick. But that was my choice. And I think there might have been some benefits to that. You have different philosophies on food and nutrition and microbes and bacteria and how you can develop nuanced immunity to different things. And if we want to be free, we need the freedom to make those choices. But I've been drinking milk, put it like that the natural way for ten years.  </p>
<p>00:20:45:24 - 00:21:16:02<br>Chris<br>And it has not made me sick. You know, my children have been drinking it. And but people out there that are opposed to this sort of thing, they have given up their responsibility. They have given up their self-government. And it was William Penn, actually the founder of Pennsylvania, where all this is happening. You know, I'm here in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and William Penn said, you know, if we won't be governed, I'm going to paraphrase this, If we won't be governed by God, will be ruled by tyrants, something to that effect.  </p>
<p>00:21:16:05 - 00:21:42:25<br>Chris<br>You know, if we won't be self-governed under the law of God, we are going to be ruled by tyrants. And for many Americans, they do not want the responsibility of making their own food choices. They want the government to tell them this is safe, this is unsafe. And what's even perhaps more concerning is that they trust the government to make those choices for them, that people still I mean, you know, you're probably like me, Marty.  </p>
<p>00:21:42:25 - 00:22:07:29<br>Chris<br>I mean, I didn't trust the government years before 2020 because years ago they were telling me it's not safe to drink milk the way my ancestors had for thousands of years. But people still, I think for many people, 2020 has just increased their utter compliance and really acceptance of a slave state where the state has become God. And that's really what this is.  </p>
<p>00:22:07:29 - 00:22:27:04<br>Chris<br>Here is the state. God does whatever the state says go, or is there a higher standard that we have a recourse to? And I would argue, and I'm not sure the perspective that you have on the show, but I would argue that in the end here, we have to go to something even higher than the American tradition and the Constitution.  </p>
<p>00:22:27:08 - 00:22:46:18<br>Chris<br>We have created the system. I'd argue with all these bureaucracy, all these departments, all this manmade law. And in the end, we have to say, look, this what the government is doing here, they must. MILLER It is evil defined by the eternal word of God, and we need to oppose it. And that's where we need to be really spending a lot of time thinking right now.  </p>
<p>00:22:46:20 - 00:23:11:15<br>Marty<br>And paraphrase one of the founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson. Like, if a law is unjust, it is your duty to disobey. I think we are we are at that point here in the United States particularly. It's really disheartening, too, because you replace God, actual God with the state as your God. The is not really an inspiring God at the end of the day at all.  </p>
<p>00:23:11:18 - 00:23:16:19<br>Marty<br>It's very and they don't do anything right. They waste money.  </p>
<p>00:23:16:22 - 00:23:36:23<br>Chris<br>The state wants to the state wants to make you a slave and take your children and sacrifice them on the altar of convenience. States like like Mo, like the ancient deities that, you know, the Israelites were tempted to worship these pagan nations. Give us your children, give us your money, give us your obedience, and we'll make your life miserable.  </p>
<p>00:23:37:00 - 00:23:39:23<br>Chris<br>And that's what that's what the state does.  </p>
<p>00:23:39:26 - 00:24:00:07<br>Marty<br>You know, you mentioned one thing there, convenience. I think that's really the biggest hurdle that we have here, is that life today seems convenient. It's very easy to pick up your phone, get on the Internet, interact with people on Twitter, you know, the shopping center, you know, the grocery store. You have all this food there. You don't have to go to the farm or, you know, to go to the farmer's market.  </p>
<p>00:24:00:07 - 00:24:21:00<br>Marty<br>You have everything you perceive you could want in the many aisles in a grocery store with money, you have access to a bank account and apps like Venmo and PayPal, and you can send and receive money as long as you're not doing particular things on social media and get on YouTube, you can get on Twitter, you can broadcast your thoughts out to the world.  </p>
<p>00:24:21:00 - 00:24:44:04<br>Marty<br>Unless there are certain thoughts doing right, doing things the hard way. I think one thing we've we've had a Texas slim Cobalt who runs K and C cattle ranch down here in Austin. We've had them on a bunch of times. And what they're really working on is a thing called the Beef initiative. And their their motto is get out and shake a rancher's hand.  </p>
<p>00:24:44:08 - 00:25:12:20<br>Marty<br>It's really overcome that convenience of going to Whole Foods or going to the grocery store to buy your beef and to go the extra mile, meet your local rancher, shake his hand and buy beef directly from him. But the sort of crux of that is foregoing that convenience that exists, and that's one thing that Americans who are dumb, fat and happy, quote unquote happy, think they're happy right now, sort of anchor to is the convenience of the modern world.  </p>
<p>00:25:12:22 - 00:25:39:03<br>Marty<br>I think that's the big hurdle we have to get over. How do we engender people to develop a sense of agency and good will to go the extra mile to figure out the convenience, to do the right thing, to get the healthy food, to get the good education, to get proper preventative health care. I think that it's not a question, but just a statement about the state of the United States of America right now.  </p>
<p>00:25:39:06 - 00:26:12:07<br>Chris<br>Yeah, yeah, we have we have a lot of work to do. I'm sure you there's a lot other things you could mention as well. But there's another part of this that to me is probably even more discouraging than the fact that we have created this manmade system, this status system, where every year, whether it's Harrisburg, the capital of Pennsylvania or Washington, D.C., the capital of the nation, we just have hundreds and hundreds of more laws being created over and over again, just tightening the grip of tyranny.  </p>
<p>00:26:12:09 - 00:26:38:27<br>Chris<br>That's concerning enough. But all of that is enabled or the tyranny that ensues from that is enabled not by the legislators, not by the governors, not by, you know, anybody up there at these high levels that we elect. And then we talk about, well, here's the important thing. You know, we got to elect someone else. All of this is enabled by ordinary people like you might have seen in those videos I shared.  </p>
<p>00:26:39:02 - 00:27:07:21<br>Chris<br>You know, there's about ten people there inside Amos Miller's farm. None of those people, from my understanding, were elected officials. None of them are high ranking people. There's three state troopers and seven employees of the Department of AG, if I understand it. You know, probably just people with families, you know, just ordinary men and women who, you know, maybe maybe went to college for some sort of environmental degree biology, got a job at the Department of Agriculture or the state troopers.  </p>
<p>00:27:07:21 - 00:27:30:10<br>Chris<br>You know, we don't want to go out there and make a difference or just get a paycheck. Those are the people that are enforcing tyranny in our nation. Those are the people. And this is this is the concern we have in our nation. We have the churches used to lead the way. You go back to, you know, the Black Robe Regiment and the American War for Independence.  </p>
<p>00:27:30:12 - 00:27:50:24<br>Chris<br>You had this idea that pastors would be out there calling on people to apply the Bible to to all of life. Did we do it perfectly? No, but we've completely lost that. And now you have these people that many of them probably you know, Lancaster County is a very rich has a rich tradition of Christianity, churches on every corner.  </p>
<p>00:27:50:27 - 00:28:21:05<br>Chris<br>Many of those people I go to church Sunday morning and then during the week, they're rating Amish farmers. And there's just this disconnect in their mind between the truth of the word of God and justice in society and in practice. They are practical statists and the state is their God, and they do whatever the state tells them. So if it's Monday morning and the state says you need to go raid this Amish man's farm, take his food, lock up the rest of his food, they say, Yes, I'll do it.  </p>
<p>00:28:21:08 - 00:28:38:22<br>Chris<br>And as long as we have Americans who are willing to enforce these mandates, these directives, we really have no hope. But we but there is hope if we can change the hearts and minds of the people. But that's where it needs to start. And so much of this, the focus is on all we get. You know, the presidential elections coming up.  </p>
<p>00:28:39:00 - 00:29:00:25<br>Chris<br>That's going to change everything. It's not going to change anything if Americans are still willing to be slaves and enslave others. You know, I'm sure people get offended if I use any analogies like this, but I don't really care. You talk about the African slave trade and you had, you know, Africans enslaving their fellow Africans to sell them into slavery.  </p>
<p>00:29:00:27 - 00:29:20:03<br>Chris<br>And the whole system is corrupt. And we have that in America. We have Americans like these state troopers and Department of AG employees who are basically selling out their neighbors in service of the state. And we get Americans willing to stand up and say, no, you know what? I'm not going to follow this order. There's a higher standard.  </p>
<p>00:29:20:07 - 00:29:25:02<br>Chris<br>We will have tyranny is what the Nazis said. I'm just following orders. And that's what these state troopers will say.  </p>
<p>00:29:25:05 - 00:29:49:16<br>Marty<br>Yeah, yeah. The Army of Karens in in our midst, that will all enslave their fellow American at the at the direction of their state leaders. But I think that's something important to really dig into. Like how much of the Karen Army going out there and taking orders is driven by fear, which is rooted in the belief that the state is all powerful.  </p>
<p>00:29:49:16 - 00:30:12:23<br>Marty<br>And if you do not listen, you will face retribution. And is there actual power behind that or is it all a big projection game? Like do we have the ability to push back against the state? I think that's what a lot of Americans, again, driven by fear. They don't think that we have any recourse to push back against the state.  </p>
<p>00:30:12:26 - 00:30:30:16<br>Chris<br>Right. Well, yeah, you mentioned a couple of things there. I mean, one, you mentioned earlier about this idea of complacency. And of course, you had the concept of bread and circuses. You know, in the Roman Empire where you keep the people entertained and fed and they'll be compliant. And we see something of that, from what I understand in China.  </p>
<p>00:30:30:16 - 00:30:58:08<br>Chris<br>I mean, just just keep the people numb, give them all the entertainment. Given the pornography. And, you know, they'll be they'll be willing slaves to the state. The only way this is going to change, I'm convinced, is is if you have and maybe it's a small group of people and a lot of things start small, but you have people who are living for something more than their own satisfaction, their own convenience, and I believe that can only happen through the gospel of Jesus Christ.  </p>
<p>00:30:58:10 - 00:31:31:15<br>Chris<br>You're going to have people who say, Look, my greatest purpose, my purpose in life is not to be at ease. My purpose in life is to honor Christ. And that includes loving my neighbor. And if I love my neighbor, you know, an Amos Miller, in a sense, the proverbial neighbor, even though he's not across the street from me, if I love my neighbor, not only Amos, but also the thousands of customers who buy their food from him because they want to be healthy if I love my neighbors, if I love if I love them and want to see justice is done, then I have to oppose injustice.  </p>
<p>00:31:31:17 - 00:31:53:26<br>Chris<br>And that's what we're missing in modern Christianity, in modern America. This idea that, well, I'm just going to go about my business and my you know, my religion is just private to me. That's not how the Old Testament prophets talk. That's not how the New Testament speaks. We are to see that justice is done. And if we care about our neighbors, we are going to want to see justice established.  </p>
<p>00:31:53:29 - 00:32:17:23<br>Chris<br>But to your other point about the fear, the thing is, at the end of the day, tyrants only have power if they have people willing to enforce their mandates. And we need I think we need a group of Americans who, one, are willing to to resist and practice civil disobedience, to say, you know, we're not following these mandates.  </p>
<p>00:32:17:25 - 00:32:39:19<br>Chris<br>And if you want to arrest Amos Miller, you're going to have to arrest all of us. But there is there is a sense there is a risk here. I mean, because you have enough you call them Karens and I call them, you know, slaves of the state or, you know, robotically going in there. Those people, as long as to them, what's more important to them is their own security.  </p>
<p>00:32:39:21 - 00:33:13:11<br>Chris<br>If that's more important than justice and righteousness, then those of us who do want to oppose this stuff, there is a risk that we are going to be locked up in prison. And there's no point in in hiding that. But as long it but that can change if the America if Americans say we're not going to to follow and enforce these mandates, if enough people like see, Amos Miller's been sticking his neck out for decades, if enough people were willing to do that, I don't think the state would even have the wherewithal and the capacity to, you know, shut it down.  </p>
<p>00:33:13:14 - 00:33:32:02<br>Chris<br>But in many ways. Amos Miller, there's other farmers like him, but in Lancaster County, I'd say he's the biggest one doing this because there are other farmers who are following all the regulations. And some of them, you know, would would, would disapprove of what Amos was doing. But I think they're missing the point that, you know, they have they have given the state an inch.  </p>
<p>00:33:32:05 - 00:33:34:04<br>Chris<br>The state's not going to be satisfied with that.  </p>
<p>00:33:34:08 - 00:34:04:17<br>Marty<br>So they give him an inch. They want another inch and they want a mile. They want everything, right. It's they never stop. It's a it's a machine with a lot of momentum behind it. And to your point of civil disobedience and the the security of the enslavers who are paid by the state, I think, again, going back to that security, it's held in that paycheck, too.  </p>
<p>00:34:04:19 - 00:34:33:27<br>Marty<br>I think this is a particularly interesting inflection point because the economic situation in the United States is systemically fragile. As we know, inflation has really affected the economy pretty acutely over the last two years. And that's what I worry about, is that you have inflation in a pretty bad spot, economic situations in a pretty bad spot. And so the state has all the leverage for the state employees, which is like, Hey, do you want this paycheck?  </p>
<p>00:34:33:27 - 00:34:58:13<br>Marty<br>Do you want to be able to buy groceries week in and week out? And that will sort of embolden them to go obey the states orders and lock up their neighbors. And that's again, and I'm not sure how familiar with Bitcoin, but that's why this started out as Bitcoin podcasts is why I work in the Bitcoin space and passionate about it, because I think the money is that the root of all of this?  </p>
<p>00:34:58:13 - 00:35:37:09<br>Marty<br>You can only fund the stupid education that teaches you the pyramid scheme of the the food pyramid. You can only fund all the pharma stuff, you can only fund all the big ag stuff with money that's printed ex nihilo. And if you have the dollar, that's the only currency that you're working for. I'm sort of beholden to that whole monetary policy and that whole monetary system, whereas Bitcoin allows you to sort of take yourself out of that and operate within a monetary system that cannot be controlled by the state or any centralized third party for that matter.  </p>
<p>00:35:37:13 - 00:36:09:21<br>Marty<br>And that's one thing I know I personally and other Bitcoiners are hoping as we transition towards 2030s, more and more people, particularly people who need it like the Amish and people want to stand up against the state and their encroachment on civil liberties. They notice Bitcoin as this way to fight back and it can provide you the security that the paycheck that the government is paying you to lock up your neighbor and over time, long enough time period period will actually provide you better security.  </p>
<p>00:36:09:21 - 00:36:30:26<br>Marty<br>And so that's the hope that people recognize this and adopt Bitcoin and that taking that action, many individuals taking that action collectively is enough of a impetus to begin standing up against the state and saying, hey, we don't need your money, we don't need your paycheck. We've got this this money over here in Bitcoin right now.  </p>
<p>00:36:30:26 - 00:36:59:07<br>Chris<br>I'm not familiar enough to make any comments on Bitcoin, but I will say as as it relates to, you know, the fiat currency, the money that the government just continues to print, another example of an unbiblical practice that leads to inflation, that leads to really theft of the next generation. And so of course, this is just another layer of tyranny where the government comes in and says we're going to control the money supply and we're going to regulate that and basically debase the currency.  </p>
<p>00:36:59:10 - 00:37:21:24<br>Chris<br>But you mentioned as well, you know, these state employees, you know, just another thing that if Americans this goes back to to the people, I really believe that Americans at this point I would have a hard time justifying, you know, someone working for the state unless they were they said, you know what, I refuse to enforce these things.  </p>
<p>00:37:21:24 - 00:37:45:15<br>Chris<br>But I think people we need to take a long, hard look. If you are employed by the state government, if you're considering it, think about what you're doing. You know, I'm not going to make a blanket statement, but it's I certainly could not work for the state and have a clean conscience. What they are doing is enforcing man made, unjust evil laws.  </p>
<p>00:37:45:15 - 00:38:07:19<br>Chris<br>The prophet Isaiah says woe to those who decree iniquitous decrees and the writers who keep writing oppression. That's what our state governments are doing. Even then, even in the reddest state, they are enforcing, they are writing man made laws and they're paying people to enforce them. And as long as Americans want that and are willing to enforce that, we're going to have a hard time at this.  </p>
<p>00:38:07:19 - 00:38:31:00<br>Chris<br>But if enough Americans are awakened and maybe through shows like yours and say, you know what, we do not want this. We want to be selfish, sponsor evil and stop working for the state. The state has no power. So that goes back to your original question. There's a fear there. Yes. But it's this vicious cycle where where the state says, we're going to we're going to take care of you.  </p>
<p>00:38:31:03 - 00:38:45:04<br>Chris<br>If you take care of us and go after your neighbors. And until we break that cycle and we're willing to pay something and give up something, our neighbors are going to keep oppressing the righteous.  </p>
<p>00:38:45:07 - 00:39:17:23<br>Marty<br>Yeah. And it's implodes on itself eventually. We've seen this throughout history. I think we're in a late stage empire situation. And similar to the Roman Empire, I mean, the parallels to the Roman Empire particularly are pretty stark and startling, specifically that the military, like Rome, the base, their currency, added a bunch of bulk metals to their coinage to the denarius slowly over time, and they expanded their military empire and take over most of the world.  </p>
<p>00:39:17:23 - 00:39:41:27<br>Marty<br>And then it got to a point where they debase their money so much that they were paying their soldiers wasn't worth anything, and they all quit and allowed the barbarians to come in and sack Rome. We had a similar situation here where we're debasing the money. I've read a newsletter about this a week ago. It startled me. First time I've run the numbers in some time, but the United States been around for 248 years.  </p>
<p>00:39:42:00 - 00:40:09:29<br>Marty<br>68% of the national debt has been accrued in the last 15 years. So 6% of the country's lifetime we've accrued 68% of the debt ballooned from 10.7 trillion in 2008, sitting at 34 trillion today, which is pretty insane. So we've debasing the currency. And if you look around the global geopolitical situation right now, we're expanding our military pretty aggressively.  </p>
<p>00:40:09:29 - 00:40:31:13<br>Marty<br>We've had some bad losses, particularly in Afghanistan. With the pull out there is pretty pretty embarrassing. And an interesting trend that I picked up on the last couple of months is military members, active military members on an on duty station across the world on TikTok like warning others do not do not join the military because the pay isn't worth it.  </p>
<p>00:40:31:13 - 00:40:57:10<br>Marty<br>I'm not making enough money. So you're having that direct parallel with the Roman army back in the day where the money, it debased it so much that it's not even worth it. You actively have active duty military members taking the tock to say don't join the army, your paycheck isn't worth it. And I think again, this is why I focus on Bitcoin, particularly because I think money is at the root of all of this.  </p>
<p>00:40:57:12 - 00:41:19:18<br>Marty<br>The the that is why Jesus went and flipped the tables at the Temple of the moneychangers because they were doing something that is probably one of the worst things you can do as a human. It's probably one of the worst things you can do because it's very sly and imperceptible. It happens slowly over time, and one day you wake up and you have 10% inflation.  </p>
<p>00:41:19:21 - 00:41:49:28<br>Marty<br>It's impossible to buy a house. The possible to buy a few bags of groceries. And you're like, How did this happen? It's like slowly but surely over time, the government and the central banks kept printing money and debasing you away. And that's what worries me. And going back to the call to action to Americans, particularly, not to obey the government, to go work for the government of a work for the state, number one, the paychecks not going to be worth it, even though they can provide you a consistent one because they can keep printing money to pay your paycheck.  </p>
<p>00:41:50:01 - 00:42:08:19<br>Marty<br>But it's extremely immoral at the end of the day, because I think it's blatantly clear that the amount of laws has been thrust. The encroachment of the state on civil liberties has gotten to a point where it is a moral situation. It is clearly immoral, at least to me. I think you would agree.  </p>
<p>00:42:08:21 - 00:42:34:09<br>Chris<br>Yeah. There's no question to me that the system that's been set up by by these government officials is evil. And we find ourselves in it. You know, we find ourselves born into this nation. And and how do we dig out of it? Out of it? So, you know, I understand people right now using the money and saying, but we need to start thinking, you know, time has passed to start thinking about how do we get out of this?  </p>
<p>00:42:34:09 - 00:42:57:23<br>Chris<br>What do we do? You know, in the meantime, of course, when people live under tyranny, they are subjected to that tyranny. And many Americans, you know, have been working for decades and and everything, all their savings, all their retirement is based on this government dollar that has been debased. And hopefully there are ways around that, not something you work on.  </p>
<p>00:42:57:26 - 00:43:22:18<br>Chris<br>But yeah, we need to change the hearts and minds of the people because at the core there needs to be an appeal to something higher than the state and. Statism is rampant in America, it's rampant in the churches. And I would define statism as as the civil government, basically claiming for itself that which Christ has given it no authority to do.  </p>
<p>00:43:22:21 - 00:43:43:02<br>Chris<br>And unless you break that in the American mind, we're really going to get nowhere, because at the end, this is a religious issue. Who's God, who's in charge, who tells us what's right and wrong? If it's a state, if there's no one above a state that says what's right and wrong, if whatever the state says goes, then the state is our God.  </p>
<p>00:43:43:05 - 00:44:06:17<br>Chris<br>And so, yeah, I was in I served in the military for and my father's in the military. But at this point, I mean, I would counsel anybody or anybody who asks me, I would say, you know what, I wouldn't join the military. In fact, even when I was in, it was very early on as I started to think through these things and civil government and biblical law, and I became very uncomfortable, you know, what are we promoting as a nation?  </p>
<p>00:44:06:23 - 00:44:30:18<br>Chris<br>You know, we endorse the slaughter of children at abortion mills. You know, we endorse homosexuality, sodomy. We debasing our currency. We are no longer a city on a hill. And until we repent, we are just we are going the way of the Roman Empire. I think it'll be a very you know, it'll be a much shorter arc for America than the Roman Empire.  </p>
<p>00:44:30:20 - 00:44:49:12<br>Marty<br>And so I think what worries people in getting go makes the convenience of the state and the convenience of life as it stands today or the perceived convenience. I would argue it's over the long run, very inconvenient certainty to the fact that you wound up enslaving yourself. What is.  </p>
<p>00:44:49:12 - 00:44:50:22<br>Chris<br>The.  </p>
<p>00:44:50:24 - 00:45:21:20<br>Marty<br>Optimistic case for getting away from the state? Like when people see this and like, oh, the government, yeah, it's it's terrible. But like, what are we going to do? It's so big. It's very entrenched in our everyday lives. Like if it were just to go away tomorrow, it seems like we'd have chaos. Is this true? What is the optimistic vision for a future in which more people stand up disobey, disengage from pushing The states wishes?  </p>
<p>00:45:21:22 - 00:45:24:27<br>Marty<br>What's the optimistic path forward?  </p>
<p>00:45:24:29 - 00:45:52:07<br>Chris<br>Yeah, well, believe it or not, I'm very optimistic. I don't know about what's going to happen in my lifetime. But again, at the core of this, for me, at the heart of this, I should say, is the guaranteed victory of the Church of Jesus Christ in the world. And I think any talk about justice, any talk about freedom, any talk about liberty, any talk about righteousness, absent the Christian worldview, is going to crumble completely.  </p>
<p>00:45:52:07 - 00:46:21:12<br>Chris<br>It is probably going to make us worse off than we are now. And so at the core is we need to, as a people, repent of our sin, you know, individually and corporately for our rejection of Christ in his word. And I think that started long ago in America, even in the 1700s. We need to repent of that because the hope is that these enemy, these are enemies, people who are who are debasing the currency, people who are raiding, you know, Amish farms, those who are supporting abortion.  </p>
<p>00:46:21:14 - 00:46:48:09<br>Chris<br>These are enemies of Christ. We need we need to revive perhaps, you know, the Christian idea of there are enemies out there. And the Bible says Christ is defeating his enemies in history. First Corinthians 15. So are are we have to start there if we are going to have any optimism about anything changing for the better? Because if we simply replace the state as our God with another manmade God is probably going to be ten times worse.  </p>
<p>00:46:48:11 - 00:47:11:18<br>Chris<br>But there is great hope in the message of the gospel. And it's not just for me personally, you know, some artistic message. It changes the culture, it changes the world. And we've seen of that over the past 2000 years. We're going through a dark, dark time right now in Western civilization, precisely because we have abandoned the gospel and the law of God.  </p>
<p>00:47:11:21 - 00:47:39:07<br>Chris<br>Now, what can we do? Small things now to get started? Well, again, I mean, I'm going to overemphasize this. People might say it's not not that important, but the churches in America need to lead the way. If you're in a church where your pastor refuses to address these issues, refuses to apply the Bible to the issue of abortion, to the issue of currency, to the issue of food freedom, you got to get out of there because we are not salt in this world.  </p>
<p>00:47:39:07 - 00:47:58:15<br>Chris<br>If we're not applying the truth of God's word to these areas, we're not loving our neighbor. So start there, but also start taking responsibility for your own life. My goodness, if you're if you're sending your kids to the government school, start right there. I mean, get them out of there and start teaching them. And you might not think you're qualified.  </p>
<p>00:47:58:15 - 00:48:22:03<br>Chris<br>I'll tell you what, you're way more qualified than some statists working for, you know, the government. They have an agenda there. They want to indoctrinate your children, educate your own children. Get get in a church where the law of God is applied to society and start you know what? Start making some risks. I know not all of us can go out right away and be like, Hey, I'm going to defy every man made mandate.  </p>
<p>00:48:22:06 - 00:48:44:12<br>Chris<br>But you know what? We can start small and this is just as important. We can support those people that are defying them. Amos Miller I think what's this? His case is going to hinge on whether or not the community local here and even nationwide gets behind him more than just donating, which is important. You can go to the links to Patriot dot com slash help.  </p>
<p>00:48:44:12 - 00:49:01:21<br>Chris<br>Amos for more information on that. But because they want to shut him down, they want his business closed. But are we willing to take any risks? Amos has taken a lot of risks over the years. Are we willing to to stand by these people and say, you know what, If you're going to arrest them, you're going to arrest me, too?  </p>
<p>00:49:01:24 - 00:49:18:21<br>Chris<br>These are things we got to think about. It's going to be small, but but a lot of these things, you know, I don't know how many people were involved in the Boston Tea Party. I don't think it was, you know, thousands of people. Things, you know, sparks that change a nation and change a culture can start with a small group of people.  </p>
<p>00:49:18:23 - 00:49:48:14<br>Chris<br>But we need to have the foundation of where we're coming from. And that's one concern I have, Marty. I mean that I see I see a lot of discouragement, unrest, frustration, and rightfully so, you know, with the left, for example. But the solution is just is as bad as the problem. It's just more manmade law, more tyranny. And unless we have freedom as defined by God's word, we will have no way of knowing what you know, left from right here.  </p>
<p>00:49:48:14 - 00:49:53:03<br>Chris<br>And we'll just be digging ourself into a deeper and deeper pit.  </p>
<p>00:49:53:05 - 00:50:21:25<br>Marty<br>Yeah, Small acts doesn't take much. I believe that was 2%, maybe 3% of the population upwards. Estimates of 10% of the individuals living in the colonies during the time of the American Revolution were the ones that actually brought forth the revolution. A very small minority, the intolerant minority, can have an outsized effect. And I would echo that like we need to, the state should not be our guide.  </p>
<p>00:50:22:01 - 00:50:54:05<br>Marty<br>I think we have these God given inalienable rights that people have completely forgotten about and just thrown to the wayside. And again, it astonishes me that today people are willing to let the state come in, dictate their lives, make more rules. I mean, as we're hyper focused on this and Bitcoin or an example like Elizabeth Warren and all these politicians trying to demonize Bitcoin and its many people backing them like, yeah, shut it down.  </p>
<p>00:50:54:05 - 00:51:24:00<br>Marty<br>And for me personally, it's like kidding me, like I as an individual can't have the agency to look at the the market for monetary goods and decide what I think is best for me. The state needs to tell me what what money I can use and the money that they tell me is the only money I can use is being consistently debased and they're taking out ungodly amounts of debt and then using that money to funnel it into education.  </p>
<p>00:51:24:00 - 00:51:49:12<br>Marty<br>That's making people stupider, more docile into food, that's making us unhealthier, into health care that really doesn't help our health at the end of the day, and most importantly, into endless wars that lead to mass deaths and suffering in other parts of the world. And I don't want that done in my name and in the state and the people cheering the state or saying, no, like Bitcoin is bad.  </p>
<p>00:51:49:15 - 00:52:19:05<br>Marty<br>You're forced to use this this cookbook, this this petrodollar, this war dollar, if you will. It's insanity. It's literally insane when you get back to first principles and you do wonder, like, does anybody the most people out there even think that they have the potential for agency at the end of the day or where they bought into a system where they think the first principle and sort of fact of life is that the state tells you what to do long remember there.  </p>
<p>00:52:19:05 - 00:52:21:06<br>Marty<br>But I think no, I mean.  </p>
<p>00:52:21:09 - 00:52:47:12<br>Chris<br>Yeah, that's where we're at. That's that that's at the heart of it. And I think the reason one of the reasons we are here as a people in America is because long ago we abandoned this idea that the law of God is supreme. And we've said, you know, what our system we've created has become the the most the most important thing.  </p>
<p>00:52:47:12 - 00:53:09:22<br>Chris<br>I mean, if you went out and talked to people on the streets and said, you know what? What's especially you start talking about politics or government, you know, what's the most important document ever written? They're going to say the US Constitution. And that's a big problem for me because the US Constitution, as great as it was and still is in some ways is not perfect.  </p>
<p>00:53:09:22 - 00:53:41:02<br>Chris<br>It's not inherent. Only the Word of God is. And when we have generations of people being taught that, you know what, we can't question what the government does because they are they are supreme. Whatever they say is the supreme law of the land, you know, then we're never going to get anywhere. We have to come back to the point where we say the standard above all people, including the US Constitution, is the law, Word of God.  </p>
<p>00:53:41:08 - 00:54:14:24<br>Chris<br>If it's not, Marty, I would debate anybody that would say, you know what, now we can have justice if we have another standard, we can't. There's no other way unless people submit to the ultimate authority, which is Christ. If not, it's going to be chaos. It always is every time. And you can't you know, if you go the status route and you go even the Republican route, they're going to oppose true freedom because their ultimate standard is not the law of liberty found in scripture.  </p>
<p>00:54:14:27 - 00:54:30:23<br>Chris<br>It is manmade law. And that is a cruel taskmaster. You know, and and whatever, you know, freedom choices with the food, with money, Bitcoin or anything else, it's going to be opposed because it doesn't serve the interests of the man made government.  </p>
<p>00:54:30:26 - 00:54:36:21<br>Marty<br>No. And the piles of money behind it in special interest rates.  </p>
<p>00:54:36:21 - 00:54:38:23<br>Chris<br>Uh, they want the money.  </p>
<p>00:54:38:25 - 00:55:03:01<br>Marty<br>But again, I think it's a I think it's doomed to implode on itself. I think, as you mentioned, the Bible says God always wins in the end. And hopefully between now and the inevitable implosion of the government, more people can wake up to this is that's what I worry about is if you have a complete implosion and and chaos, if you will, could be bad.  </p>
<p>00:55:03:03 - 00:55:21:28<br>Marty<br>But hopefully there's a middle ground where people can wake up, notice the government actually isn't as strong as it projects itself to be. You have more power as an individual here, more agency as an individual just takes the courage to speak up, to stand up, to push back. It's really not that hard. It's been done many times throughout history.  </p>
<p>00:55:22:00 - 00:55:40:21<br>Marty<br>And I think today particularly, we actually had the best opportunity to do this due to the telecommunications, technology and social media. It's a double edged sword. Yeah, it's pretty terrible in lots of ways, but it's also very good in lots of ways because it allows people to instill confidence in each other. Like, Hey, I'm thinking this too. I know you're thinking this.  </p>
<p>00:55:40:24 - 00:55:56:07<br>Marty<br>It's like the silent majority being like, are you saying this? Or you think, Yes, we're all thinking this. Let's stand up, let's push back. It's time the government has gotten too big, too hubristic, and you're leading everybody astray, making everybody's life worse off. So.  </p>
<p>00:55:56:10 - 00:56:06:27<br>Chris<br>Yeah, silver lining. Perhaps people will, you know, things like this and where we're at will. Cause, you know, the average American, the the commoner, I think is part of the title of your podcast. Right.  </p>
<p>00:56:06:29 - 00:56:07:24<br>Marty<br>Truth for the Commoner.  </p>
<p>00:56:07:24 - 00:56:25:10<br>Chris<br>Yes, Truth for the commoner. I mean, we'll start to wake up. I know there is a period of my life where I really started to say, wait a minute, what's going on here? Is it is it a loving neighbor to to regulate raw milk to to prevent when we had we have five children, at least two of them when they were born.  </p>
<p>00:56:25:10 - 00:56:47:11<br>Chris<br>The midwife who helped deliver our children was breaking the law. I think she was committing a felony. A felony, I should say, when she was doing that, because the state we were in at the time did not recognize her as a midwife. Meanwhile, babies can be aborted at the Planned Parenthood down the road. So until Americans wait a minute, something's wrong here.  </p>
<p>00:56:47:13 - 00:57:09:07<br>Chris<br>Love of neighbor is now criminalized and hatred of neighbor is authorized. Something is wrong here. Something's wrong with the money issue. Something's wrong with the food. Something's wrong with the issue of life. We can no longer blindly and we should never have. But we can no longer blindly submit to the state and say, Well, whatever the state says, they're God.  </p>
<p>00:57:09:07 - 00:57:30:13<br>Chris<br>That's it. It is leading us into a horrible place. So hope, you know, this can help. You know, the work you're doing, the situation with Amos Miller, that that we can have something of a change in the American mind because if not, the tyranny will only increase for our children. And that's the thing people really need to think about.  </p>
<p>00:57:30:16 - 00:57:49:21<br>Chris<br>If they say, well, yeah, this is bad, but I don't really want to resist that, you're just leaving it for your children, then, you know, if we're not willing to take risks now and oppose this stuff, we're going to make it that much harder for our children to do it. And if we're not setting the example for our children, you know, we're we're failing them.  </p>
<p>00:57:49:21 - 00:58:10:05<br>Chris<br>And I've talked to I've spoken with people who said, you know, their parents generation, they're part of the problem that got us here. They were complacent. They were at ease. They said, well, we're not going to try to apply the principles of justice and righteousness from the Bible in the civil sphere. We don't want to do that. And now look where we are.  </p>
<p>00:58:10:08 - 00:58:17:27<br>Chris<br>So we need to start taking action, even if it costs us because it's going to cost our children even more.  </p>
<p>00:58:18:00 - 00:58:44:15<br>Marty<br>Completely agree. Two young boys myself, I'm thinking that's when I do what I do and don't want them to grow up in a digital slavery because that's what they're trying to push us towards. Chris, thank you for the work that you're doing. The on the ground coverage is very important. I think it's crazy what you can do in the middle of Lancaster County, running right, running your own publication and then it can get out to the world.  </p>
<p>00:58:44:15 - 00:59:02:22<br>Marty<br>You have Tom Massey tweeting about it. That is, again, the beauty of social media and the beauty of taking agency and put taking the effort to actually get out there and report this as it's going on because we need more eyes on this. So, Chris, thank you for the work that you're doing. Where can anybody who's listening to this find out more about your work?  </p>
<p>00:59:02:28 - 00:59:15:12<br>Marty<br>How can they follow along with the Atlas Miller Pace and what can they do? I know you mentioned donate, but and we've talked about getting out there to so big, but anything else that we didn't mention that people should be aware of.  </p>
<p>00:59:15:14 - 00:59:33:02<br>Chris<br>Well yeah I would recommend go to the links or patriot dot com sign up for our email updates. Follow us on Twitter or x Facebook gab. I think there's going to be some more stuff happening very soon that I'm hoping will get even more reach than the initial raid. As unfortunate as that was, it was able to be.  </p>
<p>00:59:33:04 - 00:59:52:13<br>Chris<br>It was shared with a lot of people. I think something else big is coming up. I think it's going to be exciting. It's going to be an opportunity to resist, to show, you know, the state that people are behind. Amos Miller So make sure you're you're following our accounts, whether it's Twitter or Facebook or just sign up for email updates.  </p>
<p>00:59:52:16 - 01:00:11:20<br>Chris<br>And this we're not going to stop with this because if we roll over on this, the state keeps going. If they're if they're resisted, then they've really got to think twice before. If it's just Amos Miller they're up against, you know, they might be able to win. But if it's the American people, it's going to be a bit more of a problem.  </p>
<p>01:00:11:20 - 01:00:19:11<br>Chris<br>So go the extra Patriot dot com and follow us and hopefully we'll have more information, more coverage as we go here.  </p>
<p>01:00:19:14 - 01:00:26:23<br>Marty<br>Keep crushing across. I think we're going to win. We're going to win slowly but surely if someone gets it. That's all we got today for peace and love. Okay.</p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:image href="https://tftc.io/content/images/2024/01/472-Chris-Hume.png"/>
      </item>
      
      </channel>
      </rss>
    